OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/open8_urisc/open8_urisc/trunk

Subversion Repositories open8_urisc

[/] [open8_urisc/] [trunk/] [gnu/] [binutils/] [gprof/] [gprof.texi] - Blame information for rev 53

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 25 khays
\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2
@setfilename gprof.info
3
@c Copyright 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
4
@c 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009
5
@c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
6
@settitle GNU gprof
7
@setchapternewpage odd
8
 
9
@c man begin INCLUDE
10
@include bfdver.texi
11
@c man end
12
 
13
@ifnottex
14
@c This is a dir.info fragment to support semi-automated addition of
15
@c manuals to an info tree.  zoo@cygnus.com is developing this facility.
16
@dircategory Software development
17
@direntry
18
* gprof: (gprof).                Profiling your program's execution
19
@end direntry
20
@end ifnottex
21
 
22
@copying
23
This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system.
24
 
25
@c man begin COPYRIGHT
26
Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003,
27
2007, 2008, 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
28
 
29
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
30
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
31
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
32
with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
33
Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the
34
section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
35
 
36
@c man end
37
@end copying
38
 
39
@finalout
40
@smallbook
41
 
42
@titlepage
43
@title GNU gprof
44
@subtitle The @sc{gnu} Profiler
45
@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
46
@subtitle @value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
47
@end ifset
48
@subtitle Version @value{VERSION}
49
@author Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman
50
 
51
@page
52
 
53
This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
54
can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
55
execution time.  We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
56
execute programs.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
57
Eric S. Raymond made some minor corrections and additions in 2003.
58
 
59
@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
60
Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2008,
61
2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
62
 
63
      Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
64
      under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
65
      or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
66
      with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
67
      Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the
68
      section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
69
 
70
@end titlepage
71
@contents
72
 
73
@ifnottex
74
@node Top
75
@top Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time?
76
 
77
This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
78
can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
79
execution time.  We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
80
execute programs.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
81
 
82
This manual is for @code{gprof}
83
@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
84
@value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
85
@end ifset
86
version @value{VERSION}.
87
 
88
This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free
89
Documentation License version 1.3.  A copy of the license is included
90
in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
91
 
92
@menu
93
* Introduction::        What profiling means, and why it is useful.
94
 
95
* Compiling::           How to compile your program for profiling.
96
* Executing::           Executing your program to generate profile data
97
* Invoking::            How to run @code{gprof}, and its options
98
 
99
* Output::              Interpreting @code{gprof}'s output
100
 
101
* Inaccuracy::          Potential problems you should be aware of
102
* How do I?::           Answers to common questions
103
* Incompatibilities::   (between @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Unix @code{gprof}.)
104
* Details::             Details of how profiling is done
105
* GNU Free Documentation License::  GNU Free Documentation License
106
@end menu
107
@end ifnottex
108
 
109
@node Introduction
110
@chapter Introduction to Profiling
111
 
112
@ifset man
113
@c man title gprof display call graph profile data
114
 
115
@smallexample
116
@c man begin SYNOPSIS
117
gprof [ -[abcDhilLrsTvwxyz] ] [ -[ACeEfFJnNOpPqQZ][@var{name}] ]
118
 [ -I @var{dirs} ] [ -d[@var{num}] ] [ -k @var{from/to} ]
119
 [ -m @var{min-count} ] [ -R @var{map_file} ] [ -t @var{table-length} ]
120
 [ --[no-]annotated-source[=@var{name}] ]
121
 [ --[no-]exec-counts[=@var{name}] ]
122
 [ --[no-]flat-profile[=@var{name}] ] [ --[no-]graph[=@var{name}] ]
123
 [ --[no-]time=@var{name}] [ --all-lines ] [ --brief ]
124
 [ --debug[=@var{level}] ] [ --function-ordering ]
125
 [ --file-ordering @var{map_file} ] [ --directory-path=@var{dirs} ]
126
 [ --display-unused-functions ] [ --file-format=@var{name} ]
127
 [ --file-info ] [ --help ] [ --line ] [ --min-count=@var{n} ]
128
 [ --no-static ] [ --print-path ] [ --separate-files ]
129
 [ --static-call-graph ] [ --sum ] [ --table-length=@var{len} ]
130
 [ --traditional ] [ --version ] [ --width=@var{n} ]
131
 [ --ignore-non-functions ] [ --demangle[=@var{STYLE}] ]
132
 [ --no-demangle ] [--external-symbol-table=name]
133
 [ @var{image-file} ] [ @var{profile-file} @dots{} ]
134
@c man end
135
@end smallexample
136
 
137
@c man begin DESCRIPTION
138
@code{gprof} produces an execution profile of C, Pascal, or Fortran77
139
programs.  The effect of called routines is incorporated in the profile
140
of each caller.  The profile data is taken from the call graph profile file
141
(@file{gmon.out} default) which is created by programs
142
that are compiled with the @samp{-pg} option of
143
@code{cc}, @code{pc}, and @code{f77}.
144
The @samp{-pg} option also links in versions of the library routines
145
that are compiled for profiling.  @code{Gprof} reads the given object
146
file (the default is @code{a.out}) and establishes the relation between
147
its symbol table and the call graph profile from @file{gmon.out}.
148
If more than one profile file is specified, the @code{gprof}
149
output shows the sum of the profile information in the given profile files.
150
 
151
@code{Gprof} calculates the amount of time spent in each routine.
152
Next, these times are propagated along the edges of the call graph.
153
Cycles are discovered, and calls into a cycle are made to share the time
154
of the cycle.
155
 
156
@c man end
157
 
158
@c man begin BUGS
159
The granularity of the sampling is shown, but remains
160
statistical at best.
161
We assume that the time for each execution of a function
162
can be expressed by the total time for the function divided
163
by the number of times the function is called.
164
Thus the time propagated along the call graph arcs to the function's
165
parents is directly proportional to the number of times that
166
arc is traversed.
167
 
168
Parents that are not themselves profiled will have the time of
169
their profiled children propagated to them, but they will appear
170
to be spontaneously invoked in the call graph listing, and will
171
not have their time propagated further.
172
Similarly, signal catchers, even though profiled, will appear
173
to be spontaneous (although for more obscure reasons).
174
Any profiled children of signal catchers should have their times
175
propagated properly, unless the signal catcher was invoked during
176
the execution of the profiling routine, in which case all is lost.
177
 
178
The profiled program must call @code{exit}(2)
179
or return normally for the profiling information to be saved
180
in the @file{gmon.out} file.
181
@c man end
182
 
183
@c man begin FILES
184
@table @code
185
@item @file{a.out}
186
the namelist and text space.
187
@item @file{gmon.out}
188
dynamic call graph and profile.
189
@item @file{gmon.sum}
190
summarized dynamic call graph and profile.
191
@end table
192
@c man end
193
 
194
@c man begin SEEALSO
195
monitor(3), profil(2), cc(1), prof(1), and the Info entry for @file{gprof}.
196
 
197
``An Execution Profiler for Modular Programs'',
198
by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
199
Software - Practice and Experience,
200
Vol. 13, pp. 671-685, 1983.
201
 
202
``gprof: A Call Graph Execution Profiler'',
203
by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
204
Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '82 Symposium on Compiler Construction,
205
SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 17, No  6, pp. 120-126, June 1982.
206
@c man end
207
@end ifset
208
 
209
Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and which
210
functions called which other functions while it was executing.  This
211
information can show you which pieces of your program are slower than you
212
expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your program
213
execute faster.  It can also tell you which functions are being called more
214
or less often than you expected.  This may help you spot bugs that had
215
otherwise been unnoticed.
216
 
217
Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual execution
218
of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large or too
219
complex to analyze by reading the source.  However, how your program is run
220
will affect the information that shows up in the profile data.  If you
221
don't use some feature of your program while it is being profiled, no
222
profile information will be generated for that feature.
223
 
224
Profiling has several steps:
225
 
226
@itemize @bullet
227
@item
228
You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled.
229
@xref{Compiling, ,Compiling a Program for Profiling}.
230
 
231
@item
232
You must execute your program to generate a profile data file.
233
@xref{Executing, ,Executing the Program}.
234
 
235
@item
236
You must run @code{gprof} to analyze the profile data.
237
@xref{Invoking, ,@code{gprof} Command Summary}.
238
@end itemize
239
 
240
The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail.
241
 
242
@c man begin DESCRIPTION
243
 
244
Several forms of output are available from the analysis.
245
 
246
The @dfn{flat profile} shows how much time your program spent in each function,
247
and how many times that function was called.  If you simply want to know
248
which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated concisely here.
249
@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
250
 
251
The @dfn{call graph} shows, for each function, which functions called it, which
252
other functions it called, and how many times.  There is also an estimate
253
of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function.  This can
254
suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls that use a
255
lot of time.  @xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
256
 
257
The @dfn{annotated source} listing is a copy of the program's
258
source code, labeled with the number of times each line of the
259
program was executed.  @xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source
260
Listing}.
261
@c man end
262
 
263
To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read
264
a description of its implementation.
265
@xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
266
 
267
@node Compiling
268
@chapter Compiling a Program for Profiling
269
 
270
The first step in generating profile information for your program is
271
to compile and link it with profiling enabled.
272
 
273
To compile a source file for profiling, specify the @samp{-pg} option when
274
you run the compiler.  (This is in addition to the options you normally
275
use.)
276
 
277
To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as @code{cc}
278
to do the linking, simply specify @samp{-pg} in addition to your usual
279
options.  The same option, @samp{-pg}, alters either compilation or linking
280
to do what is necessary for profiling.  Here are examples:
281
 
282
@example
283
cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg
284
cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg
285
@end example
286
 
287
The @samp{-pg} option also works with a command that both compiles and links:
288
 
289
@example
290
cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg
291
@end example
292
 
293
Note: The @samp{-pg} option must be part of your compilation options
294
as well as your link options.  If it is not then no call-graph data
295
will be gathered and when you run @code{gprof} you will get an error
296
message like this:
297
 
298
@example
299
gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
300
@end example
301
 
302
If you add the @samp{-Q} switch to suppress the printing of the call
303
graph data you will still be able to see the time samples:
304
 
305
@example
306
Flat profile:
307
 
308
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
309
  %   cumulative   self              self     total
310
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  Ts/call  Ts/call  name
311
 44.12      0.07     0.07                             zazLoop
312
 35.29      0.14     0.06                             main
313
 20.59      0.17     0.04                             bazMillion
314
@end example
315
 
316
If you run the linker @code{ld} directly instead of through a compiler
317
such as @code{cc}, you may have to specify a profiling startup file
318
@file{gcrt0.o} as the first input file instead of the usual startup
319
file @file{crt0.o}.  In addition, you would probably want to
320
specify the profiling C library, @file{libc_p.a}, by writing
321
@samp{-lc_p} instead of the usual @samp{-lc}.  This is not absolutely
322
necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls information for
323
standard library functions such as @code{read} and @code{open}.  For
324
example:
325
 
326
@example
327
ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p
328
@end example
329
 
330
If you are running the program on a system which supports shared
331
libraries you may run into problems with the profiling support code in
332
a shared library being called before that library has been fully
333
initialised.  This is usually detected by the program encountering a
334
segmentation fault as soon as it is run.  The solution is to link
335
against a static version of the library containing the profiling
336
support code, which for @code{gcc} users can be done via the
337
@samp{-static} or @samp{-static-libgcc} command line option.  For
338
example:
339
 
340
@example
341
gcc -g -pg -static-libgcc myprog.c utils.c -o myprog
342
@end example
343
 
344
If you compile only some of the modules of the program with @samp{-pg}, you
345
can still profile the program, but you won't get complete information about
346
the modules that were compiled without @samp{-pg}.  The only information
347
you get for the functions in those modules is the total time spent in them;
348
there is no record of how many times they were called, or from where.  This
349
will not affect the flat profile (except that the @code{calls} field for
350
the functions will be blank), but will greatly reduce the usefulness of the
351
call graph.
352
 
353
If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling you should use the
354
@code{gcov} tool instead of @code{gprof}.  See that tool's manual or
355
info pages for more details of how to do this.
356
 
357
Note, older versions of @code{gcc} produce line-by-line profiling
358
information that works with @code{gprof} rather than @code{gcov} so
359
there is still support for displaying this kind of information in
360
@code{gprof}. @xref{Line-by-line, ,Line-by-line Profiling}.
361
 
362
It also worth noting that @code{gcc} implements a
363
@samp{-finstrument-functions} command line option which will insert
364
calls to special user supplied instrumentation routines at the entry
365
and exit of every function in their program.  This can be used to
366
implement an alternative profiling scheme.
367
 
368
@node Executing
369
@chapter Executing the Program
370
 
371
Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to
372
generate the information that @code{gprof} needs.  Simply run the program
373
as usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc.  The program should
374
run normally, producing the same output as usual.  It will, however, run
375
somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and
376
writing the profile data.
377
 
378
The way you run the program---the arguments and input that you give
379
it---may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows.  The
380
profile data will describe the parts of the program that were activated for
381
the particular input you use.  For example, if the first command you give
382
to your program is to quit, the profile data will show the time used in
383
initialization and in cleanup, but not much else.
384
 
385
Your program will write the profile data into a file called @file{gmon.out}
386
just before exiting.  If there is already a file called @file{gmon.out},
387
its contents are overwritten.  There is currently no way to tell the
388
program to write the profile data under a different name, but you can rename
389
the file afterwards if you are concerned that it may be overwritten.
390
 
391
In order to write the @file{gmon.out} file properly, your program must exit
392
normally: by returning from @code{main} or by calling @code{exit}.  Calling
393
the low-level function @code{_exit} does not write the profile data, and
394
neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal.
395
 
396
The @file{gmon.out} file is written in the program's @emph{current working
397
directory} at the time it exits.  This means that if your program calls
398
@code{chdir}, the @file{gmon.out} file will be left in the last directory
399
your program @code{chdir}'d to.  If you don't have permission to write in
400
this directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message.
401
 
402
Older versions of the @sc{gnu} profiling library may also write a file
403
called @file{bb.out}.  This file, if present, contains an human-readable
404
listing of the basic-block execution counts.  Unfortunately, the
405
appearance of a human-readable @file{bb.out} means the basic-block
406
counts didn't get written into @file{gmon.out}.
407
The Perl script @code{bbconv.pl}, included with the @code{gprof}
408
source distribution, will convert a @file{bb.out} file into
409
a format readable by @code{gprof}.  Invoke it like this:
410
 
411
@smallexample
412
bbconv.pl < bb.out > @var{bh-data}
413
@end smallexample
414
 
415
This translates the information in @file{bb.out} into a form that
416
@code{gprof} can understand.  But you still need to tell @code{gprof}
417
about the existence of this translated information.  To do that, include
418
@var{bb-data} on the @code{gprof} command line, @emph{along with
419
@file{gmon.out}}, like this:
420
 
421
@smallexample
422
gprof @var{options} @var{executable-file} gmon.out @var{bb-data} [@var{yet-more-profile-data-files}@dots{}] [> @var{outfile}]
423
@end smallexample
424
 
425
@node Invoking
426
@chapter @code{gprof} Command Summary
427
 
428
After you have a profile data file @file{gmon.out}, you can run @code{gprof}
429
to interpret the information in it.  The @code{gprof} program prints a
430
flat profile and a call graph on standard output.  Typically you would
431
redirect the output of @code{gprof} into a file with @samp{>}.
432
 
433
You run @code{gprof} like this:
434
 
435
@smallexample
436
gprof @var{options} [@var{executable-file} [@var{profile-data-files}@dots{}]] [> @var{outfile}]
437
@end smallexample
438
 
439
@noindent
440
Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments.
441
 
442
If you omit the executable file name, the file @file{a.out} is used.  If
443
you give no profile data file name, the file @file{gmon.out} is used.  If
444
any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not
445
appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed.
446
 
447
You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their names
448
after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the data files
449
are summed together.
450
 
451
The order of these options does not matter.
452
 
453
@menu
454
* Output Options::      Controlling @code{gprof}'s output style
455
* Analysis Options::    Controlling how @code{gprof} analyzes its data
456
* Miscellaneous Options::
457
* Deprecated Options::  Options you no longer need to use, but which
458
                            have been retained for compatibility
459
* Symspecs::            Specifying functions to include or exclude
460
@end menu
461
 
462
@node Output Options
463
@section Output Options
464
 
465
@c man begin OPTIONS
466
These options specify which of several output formats
467
@code{gprof} should produce.
468
 
469
Many of these options take an optional @dfn{symspec} to specify
470
functions to be included or excluded.  These options can be
471
specified multiple times, with different symspecs, to include
472
or exclude sets of symbols.  @xref{Symspecs, ,Symspecs}.
473
 
474
Specifying any of these options overrides the default (@samp{-p -q}),
475
which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis
476
for all functions.
477
 
478
@table @code
479
 
480
@item -A[@var{symspec}]
481
@itemx --annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
482
The @samp{-A} option causes @code{gprof} to print annotated source code.
483
If @var{symspec} is specified, print output only for matching symbols.
484
@xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source Listing}.
485
 
486
@item -b
487
@itemx --brief
488
If the @samp{-b} option is given, @code{gprof} doesn't print the
489
verbose blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in
490
the tables.  This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or
491
are tired of seeing the blurbs.
492
 
493
@item -C[@var{symspec}]
494
@itemx --exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
495
The @samp{-C} option causes @code{gprof} to
496
print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
497
If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally only for matching symbols.
498
 
499
If the profile data file contains basic-block count records, specifying
500
the @samp{-l} option, along with @samp{-C}, will cause basic-block
501
execution counts to be tallied and displayed.
502
 
503
@item -i
504
@itemx --file-info
505
The @samp{-i} option causes @code{gprof} to display summary information
506
about the profile data file(s) and then exit.  The number of histogram,
507
call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed.
508
 
509
@item -I @var{dirs}
510
@itemx --directory-path=@var{dirs}
511
The @samp{-I} option specifies a list of search directories in
512
which to find source files.  Environment variable @var{GPROF_PATH}
513
can also be used to convey this information.
514
Used mostly for annotated source output.
515
 
516
@item -J[@var{symspec}]
517
@itemx --no-annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
518
The @samp{-J} option causes @code{gprof} not to
519
print annotated source code.
520
If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints annotated source,
521
but excludes matching symbols.
522
 
523
@item -L
524
@itemx --print-path
525
Normally, source filenames are printed with the path
526
component suppressed.  The @samp{-L} option causes @code{gprof}
527
to print the full pathname of
528
source filenames, which is determined
529
from symbolic debugging information in the image file
530
and is relative to the directory in which the compiler
531
was invoked.
532
 
533
@item -p[@var{symspec}]
534
@itemx --flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
535
The @samp{-p} option causes @code{gprof} to print a flat profile.
536
If @var{symspec} is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols.
537
@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
538
 
539
@item -P[@var{symspec}]
540
@itemx --no-flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
541
The @samp{-P} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing a flat profile.
542
If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a flat profile,
543
but excludes matching symbols.
544
 
545
@item -q[@var{symspec}]
546
@itemx --graph[=@var{symspec}]
547
The @samp{-q} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis.
548
If @var{symspec} is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols
549
and their children.
550
@xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
551
 
552
@item -Q[@var{symspec}]
553
@itemx --no-graph[=@var{symspec}]
554
The @samp{-Q} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing the
555
call graph.
556
If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a call graph,
557
but excludes matching symbols.
558
 
559
@item -t
560
@itemx --table-length=@var{num}
561
The @samp{-t} option causes the @var{num} most active source lines in
562
each source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled.  The
563
default is 10.
564
 
565
@item -y
566
@itemx --separate-files
567
This option affects annotated source output only.
568
Normally, @code{gprof} prints annotated source files
569
to standard-output.  If this option is specified,
570
annotated source for a file named @file{path/@var{filename}}
571
is generated in the file @file{@var{filename}-ann}.  If the underlying
572
file system would truncate @file{@var{filename}-ann} so that it
573
overwrites the original @file{@var{filename}}, @code{gprof} generates
574
annotated source in the file @file{@var{filename}.ann} instead (if the
575
original file name has an extension, that extension is @emph{replaced}
576
with @file{.ann}).
577
 
578
@item -Z[@var{symspec}]
579
@itemx --no-exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
580
The @samp{-Z} option causes @code{gprof} not to
581
print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
582
If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally, but exclude matching symbols.
583
 
584
@item -r
585
@itemx --function-ordering
586
The @samp{--function-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
587
suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling data.
588
This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
589
cache behavior for the program on systems which support arbitrary
590
ordering of functions in an executable.
591
 
592
The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions
593
in a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this
594
manual.
595
 
596
@item -R @var{map_file}
597
@itemx --file-ordering @var{map_file}
598
The @samp{--file-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
599
suggested .o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data.
600
This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
601
cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary
602
ordering of functions in an executable.
603
 
604
Use of the @samp{-a} argument is highly recommended with this option.
605
 
606
The @var{map_file} argument is a pathname to a file which provides
607
function name to object file mappings.  The format of the file is similar to
608
the output of the program @code{nm}.
609
 
610
@smallexample
611
@group
612
c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse
613
c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag
614
c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name
615
c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics
616
c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword
617
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier
618
c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type
619
@dots{}
620
 
621
@end group
622
@end smallexample
623
 
624
To create a @var{map_file} with @sc{gnu} @code{nm}, type a command like
625
@kbd{nm --extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name}.
626
 
627
@item -T
628
@itemx --traditional
629
The @samp{-T} option causes @code{gprof} to print its output in
630
``traditional'' BSD style.
631
 
632
@item -w @var{width}
633
@itemx --width=@var{width}
634
Sets width of output lines to @var{width}.
635
Currently only used when printing the function index at the bottom
636
of the call graph.
637
 
638
@item -x
639
@itemx --all-lines
640
This option affects annotated source output only.
641
By default, only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block
642
are annotated.  If this option is specified, every line in
643
a basic-block is annotated by repeating the annotation for the
644
first line.  This behavior is similar to @code{tcov}'s @samp{-a}.
645
 
646
@item --demangle[=@var{style}]
647
@itemx --no-demangle
648
These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled when
649
printing output.  The default is to demangle symbols.  The
650
@code{--no-demangle} option may be used to turn off demangling. Different
651
compilers have different mangling styles.  The optional demangling style
652
argument can be used to choose an appropriate demangling style for your
653
compiler.
654
@end table
655
 
656
@node Analysis Options
657
@section Analysis Options
658
 
659
@table @code
660
 
661
@item -a
662
@itemx --no-static
663
The @samp{-a} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress the printing of
664
statically declared (private) functions.  (These are functions whose
665
names are not listed as global, and which are not visible outside the
666
file/function/block where they were defined.)  Time spent in these
667
functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be attributed to the
668
function that was loaded directly before it in the executable file.
669
@c This is compatible with Unix @code{gprof}, but a bad idea.
670
This option affects both the flat profile and the call graph.
671
 
672
@item -c
673
@itemx --static-call-graph
674
The @samp{-c} option causes the call graph of the program to be
675
augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the object
676
file and identifies function calls in the binary machine code.
677
Since normal call graph records are only generated when functions are
678
entered, this option identifies children that could have been called,
679
but never were.  Calls to functions that were not compiled with
680
profiling enabled are also identified, but only if symbol table
681
entries are present for them.
682
Calls to dynamic library routines are typically @emph{not} found
683
by this option.
684
Parents or children identified via this heuristic
685
are indicated in the call graph with call counts of @samp{0}.
686
 
687
@item -D
688
@itemx --ignore-non-functions
689
The @samp{-D} option causes @code{gprof} to ignore symbols which
690
are not known to be functions.  This option will give more accurate
691
profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for
692
example).
693
 
694
@item -k @var{from}/@var{to}
695
The @samp{-k} option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs from
696
symbols matching symspec @var{from} to those matching symspec @var{to}.
697
 
698
@item -l
699
@itemx --line
700
The @samp{-l} option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes
701
histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines,
702
instead of functions.  This feature only works with programs compiled
703
by older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler.  Newer versions of
704
@code{gcc} are designed to work with the @code{gcov} tool instead.
705
 
706
If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled,
707
this option will also identify how many times each line of
708
code was executed.
709
While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function
710
a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases
711
the running time of @code{gprof}, and magnifies statistical
712
inaccuracies.
713
@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error}.
714
 
715
@item -m @var{num}
716
@itemx --min-count=@var{num}
717
This option affects execution count output only.
718
Symbols that are executed less than @var{num} times are suppressed.
719
 
720
@item -n@var{symspec}
721
@itemx --time=@var{symspec}
722
The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
723
to only propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
724
 
725
@item -N@var{symspec}
726
@itemx --no-time=@var{symspec}
727
The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
728
not to propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
729
 
730
@item -S@var{filename}
731
@itemx --external-symbol-table=@var{filename}
732
The @samp{-S} option causes @code{gprof} to read an external symbol table
733
file, such as @file{/proc/kallsyms}, rather than read the symbol table
734
from the given object file (the default is @code{a.out}). This is useful
735
for profiling kernel modules.
736
 
737
@item -z
738
@itemx --display-unused-functions
739
If you give the @samp{-z} option, @code{gprof} will mention all
740
functions in the flat profile, even those that were never called, and
741
that had no time spent in them.  This is useful in conjunction with the
742
@samp{-c} option for discovering which routines were never called.
743
 
744
@end table
745
 
746
@node Miscellaneous Options
747
@section Miscellaneous Options
748
 
749
@table @code
750
 
751
@item -d[@var{num}]
752
@itemx --debug[=@var{num}]
753
The @samp{-d @var{num}} option specifies debugging options.
754
If @var{num} is not specified, enable all debugging.
755
@xref{Debugging, ,Debugging @code{gprof}}.
756
 
757
@item -h
758
@itemx --help
759
The @samp{-h} option prints command line usage.
760
 
761
@item -O@var{name}
762
@itemx --file-format=@var{name}
763
Selects the format of the profile data files.  Recognized formats are
764
@samp{auto} (the default), @samp{bsd}, @samp{4.4bsd}, @samp{magic}, and
765
@samp{prof} (not yet supported).
766
 
767
@item -s
768
@itemx --sum
769
The @samp{-s} option causes @code{gprof} to summarize the information
770
in the profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data
771
file called @file{gmon.sum}, which contains all the information from
772
the profile data files that @code{gprof} read in.  The file @file{gmon.sum}
773
may be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to
774
merge the data in the other input files into @file{gmon.sum}.
775
 
776
Eventually you can run @code{gprof} again without @samp{-s} to analyze the
777
cumulative data in the file @file{gmon.sum}.
778
 
779
@item -v
780
@itemx --version
781
The @samp{-v} flag causes @code{gprof} to print the current version
782
number, and then exit.
783
 
784
@end table
785
 
786
@node Deprecated Options
787
@section Deprecated Options
788
 
789
These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs.
790
 
791
@table @code
792
 
793
@item -e @var{function_name}
794
The @samp{-e @var{function}} option tells @code{gprof} to not print
795
information about the function @var{function_name} (and its
796
children@dots{}) in the call graph.  The function will still be listed
797
as a child of any functions that call it, but its index number will be
798
shown as @samp{[not printed]}.  More than one @samp{-e} option may be
799
given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-e}
800
option.
801
 
802
@item -E @var{function_name}
803
The @code{-E @var{function}} option works like the @code{-e} option, but
804
time spent in the function (and children who were not called from
805
anywhere else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for
806
the call graph.  More than one @samp{-E} option may be given; only one
807
@var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-E} option.
808
 
809
@item -f @var{function_name}
810
The @samp{-f @var{function}} option causes @code{gprof} to limit the
811
call graph to the function @var{function_name} and its children (and
812
their children@dots{}).  More than one @samp{-f} option may be given;
813
only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-f}
814
option.
815
 
816
@item -F @var{function_name}
817
The @samp{-F @var{function}} option works like the @code{-f} option, but
818
only time spent in the function and its children (and their
819
children@dots{}) will be used to determine total-time and
820
percentages-of-time for the call graph.  More than one @samp{-F} option
821
may be given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each
822
@samp{-F} option.  The @samp{-F} option overrides the @samp{-E} option.
823
 
824
@end table
825
 
826
@c man end
827
 
828
Note that only one function can be specified with each @code{-e},
829
@code{-E}, @code{-f} or @code{-F} option.  To specify more than one
830
function, use multiple options.  For example, this command:
831
 
832
@example
833
gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output
834
@end example
835
 
836
@noindent
837
lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either
838
@code{foo} or @code{bar} and were not reachable from @code{boring}.
839
 
840
@node Symspecs
841
@section Symspecs
842
 
843
Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded
844
using @dfn{symspecs} (symbol specifications), which observe the
845
following syntax:
846
 
847
@example
848
  filename_containing_a_dot
849
| funcname_not_containing_a_dot
850
| linenumber
851
| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) )
852
@end example
853
 
854
Here are some sample symspecs:
855
 
856
@table @samp
857
@item main.c
858
Selects everything in file @file{main.c}---the
859
dot in the string tells @code{gprof} to interpret
860
the string as a filename, rather than as
861
a function name.  To select a file whose
862
name does not contain a dot, a trailing colon
863
should be specified.  For example, @samp{odd:} is
864
interpreted as the file named @file{odd}.
865
 
866
@item main
867
Selects all functions named @samp{main}.
868
 
869
Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name
870
because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static).  Unless a
871
function name is unique in a program, you must use the colon notation
872
explained below to specify a function from a specific source file.
873
 
874
Sometimes, function names contain dots.  In such cases, it is necessary
875
to add a leading colon to the name.  For example, @samp{:.mul} selects
876
function @samp{.mul}.
877
 
878
In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore.
879
@code{gprof} will normally not print these underscores.  When you name a
880
symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as @code{gprof} prints
881
it in its output.  For example, if the compiler produces a symbol
882
@samp{_main} from your @code{main} function, @code{gprof} still prints
883
it as @samp{main} in its output, so you should use @samp{main} in
884
symspecs.
885
 
886
@item main.c:main
887
Selects function @samp{main} in file @file{main.c}.
888
 
889
@item main.c:134
890
Selects line 134 in file @file{main.c}.
891
@end table
892
 
893
@node Output
894
@chapter Interpreting @code{gprof}'s Output
895
 
896
@code{gprof} can produce several different output styles, the
897
most important of which are described below.  The simplest output
898
styles (file information, execution count, and function and file ordering)
899
are not described here, but are documented with the respective options
900
that trigger them.
901
@xref{Output Options, ,Output Options}.
902
 
903
@menu
904
* Flat Profile::        The flat profile shows how much time was spent
905
                            executing directly in each function.
906
* Call Graph::          The call graph shows which functions called which
907
                            others, and how much time each function used
908
                            when its subroutine calls are included.
909
* Line-by-line::        @code{gprof} can analyze individual source code lines
910
* Annotated Source::    The annotated source listing displays source code
911
                            labeled with execution counts
912
@end menu
913
 
914
 
915
@node Flat Profile
916
@section The Flat Profile
917
@cindex flat profile
918
 
919
The @dfn{flat profile} shows the total amount of time your program
920
spent executing each function.  Unless the @samp{-z} option is given,
921
functions with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls
922
to them, are not mentioned.  Note that if a function was not compiled
923
for profiling, and didn't run long enough to show up on the program
924
counter histogram, it will be indistinguishable from a function that
925
was never called.
926
 
927
This is part of a flat profile for a small program:
928
 
929
@smallexample
930
@group
931
Flat profile:
932
 
933
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
934
  %   cumulative   self              self     total
935
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  ms/call  ms/call  name
936
 33.34      0.02     0.02     7208     0.00     0.00  open
937
 16.67      0.03     0.01      244     0.04     0.12  offtime
938
 16.67      0.04     0.01        8     1.25     1.25  memccpy
939
 16.67      0.05     0.01        7     1.43     1.43  write
940
 16.67      0.06     0.01                             mcount
941
  0.00      0.06     0.00      236     0.00     0.00  tzset
942
  0.00      0.06     0.00      192     0.00     0.00  tolower
943
  0.00      0.06     0.00       47     0.00     0.00  strlen
944
  0.00      0.06     0.00       45     0.00     0.00  strchr
945
  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    50.00  main
946
  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  memcpy
947
  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    10.11  print
948
  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  profil
949
  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    50.00  report
950
@dots{}
951
@end group
952
@end smallexample
953
 
954
@noindent
955
The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them,
956
then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name.  The
957
functions @samp{mcount} and @samp{profil} are part of the profiling
958
apparatus and appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of
959
the amount of overhead due to profiling.
960
 
961
Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating
962
how much time each sample counted as.
963
This @dfn{sampling period} estimates the margin of error in each of the time
964
figures.  A time figure that is not much larger than this is not
965
reliable.  In this example, each sample counted as 0.01 seconds,
966
suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate.
967
The program's total execution time was 0.06
968
seconds, as indicated by the @samp{cumulative seconds} field.  Since
969
each sample counted for 0.01 seconds, this means only six samples
970
were taken during the run.  Two of the samples occurred while the
971
program was in the @samp{open} function, as indicated by the
972
@samp{self seconds} field.  Each of the other four samples
973
occurred one each in @samp{offtime}, @samp{memccpy}, @samp{write},
974
and @samp{mcount}.
975
Since only six samples were taken, none of these values can
976
be regarded as particularly reliable.
977
In another run,
978
the @samp{self seconds} field for
979
@samp{mcount} might well be @samp{0.00} or @samp{0.02}.
980
@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error},
981
for a complete discussion.
982
 
983
The remaining functions in the listing (those whose
984
@samp{self seconds} field is @samp{0.00}) didn't appear
985
in the histogram samples at all.  However, the call graph
986
indicated that they were called, so therefore they are listed,
987
sorted in decreasing order by the @samp{calls} field.
988
Clearly some time was spent executing these functions,
989
but the paucity of histogram samples prevents any
990
determination of how much time each took.
991
 
992
Here is what the fields in each line mean:
993
 
994
@table @code
995
@item % time
996
This is the percentage of the total execution time your program spent
997
in this function.  These should all add up to 100%.
998
 
999
@item cumulative seconds
1000
This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent
1001
executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions
1002
above this one in this table.
1003
 
1004
@item self seconds
1005
This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone.
1006
The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number.
1007
 
1008
@item calls
1009
This is the total number of times the function was called.  If the
1010
function was never called, or the number of times it was called cannot
1011
be determined (probably because the function was not compiled with
1012
profiling enabled), the @dfn{calls} field is blank.
1013
 
1014
@item self ms/call
1015
This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1016
function per call, if this function is profiled.  Otherwise, this field
1017
is blank for this function.
1018
 
1019
@item total ms/call
1020
This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1021
function and its descendants per call, if this function is profiled.
1022
Otherwise, this field is blank for this function.
1023
This is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph analysis.
1024
 
1025
@item name
1026
This is the name of the function.   The flat profile is sorted by this
1027
field alphabetically after the @dfn{self seconds} and @dfn{calls}
1028
fields are sorted.
1029
@end table
1030
 
1031
@node Call Graph
1032
@section The Call Graph
1033
@cindex call graph
1034
 
1035
The @dfn{call graph} shows how much time was spent in each function
1036
and its children.  From this information, you can find functions that,
1037
while they themselves may not have used much time, called other
1038
functions that did use unusual amounts of time.
1039
 
1040
Here is a sample call from a small program.  This call came from the
1041
same @code{gprof} run as the flat profile example in the previous
1042
section.
1043
 
1044
@smallexample
1045
@group
1046
granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds
1047
 
1048
index % time    self  children    called     name
1049
                                                 <spontaneous>
1050
[1]    100.0    0.00    0.05                 start [1]
1051
                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1052
                0.00    0.00       1/2           on_exit [28]
1053
                0.00    0.00       1/1           exit [59]
1054
-----------------------------------------------
1055
                0.00    0.05       1/1           start [1]
1056
[2]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         main [2]
1057
                0.00    0.05       1/1           report [3]
1058
-----------------------------------------------
1059
                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1060
[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1061
                0.00    0.03       8/8           timelocal [6]
1062
                0.00    0.01       1/1           print [9]
1063
                0.00    0.01       9/9           fgets [12]
1064
                0.00    0.00      12/34          strncmp <cycle 1> [40]
1065
                0.00    0.00       8/8           lookup [20]
1066
                0.00    0.00       1/1           fopen [21]
1067
                0.00    0.00       8/8           chewtime [24]
1068
                0.00    0.00       8/16          skipspace [44]
1069
-----------------------------------------------
1070
[4]     59.8    0.01        0.02       8+472     <cycle 2 as a whole> [4]
1071
                0.01        0.02     244+260         offtime <cycle 2> [7]
1072
                0.00        0.00     236+1           tzset <cycle 2> [26]
1073
-----------------------------------------------
1074
@end group
1075
@end smallexample
1076
 
1077
The lines full of dashes divide this table into @dfn{entries}, one for each
1078
function.  Each entry has one or more lines.
1079
 
1080
In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index number
1081
in square brackets.  The end of this line says which function the entry is
1082
for.  The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of this
1083
function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also called
1084
@dfn{children} when we speak of the call graph).
1085
 
1086
The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its subroutines.
1087
 
1088
The internal profiling function @code{mcount} (@pxref{Flat Profile, ,The
1089
Flat Profile}) is never mentioned in the call graph.
1090
 
1091
@menu
1092
* Primary::       Details of the primary line's contents.
1093
* Callers::       Details of caller-lines' contents.
1094
* Subroutines::   Details of subroutine-lines' contents.
1095
* Cycles::        When there are cycles of recursion,
1096
                   such as @code{a} calls @code{b} calls @code{a}@dots{}
1097
@end menu
1098
 
1099
@node Primary
1100
@subsection The Primary Line
1101
 
1102
The @dfn{primary line} in a call graph entry is the line that
1103
describes the function which the entry is about and gives the overall
1104
statistics for this function.
1105
 
1106
For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function
1107
@code{report} in our main example, together with the heading line that
1108
shows the names of the fields:
1109
 
1110
@smallexample
1111
@group
1112
index  % time    self  children called     name
1113
@dots{}
1114
[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1115
@end group
1116
@end smallexample
1117
 
1118
Here is what the fields in the primary line mean:
1119
 
1120
@table @code
1121
@item index
1122
Entries are numbered with consecutive integers.  Each function
1123
therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of its
1124
primary line.
1125
 
1126
Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of
1127
another, gives its index number as well as its name.  The index number
1128
guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that function.
1129
 
1130
@item % time
1131
This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this
1132
function, including time spent in subroutines called from this
1133
function.
1134
 
1135
The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of
1136
this function.  Therefore, adding up these percentages is meaningless.
1137
 
1138
@item self
1139
This is the total amount of time spent in this function.  This
1140
should be identical to the number printed in the @code{seconds} field
1141
for this function in the flat profile.
1142
 
1143
@item children
1144
This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made by
1145
this function.  This should be equal to the sum of all the @code{self}
1146
and @code{children} entries of the children listed directly below this
1147
function.
1148
 
1149
@item called
1150
This is the number of times the function was called.
1151
 
1152
If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers,
1153
separated by a @samp{+}.  The first number counts non-recursive calls,
1154
and the second counts recursive calls.
1155
 
1156
In the example above, the function @code{report} was called once from
1157
@code{main}.
1158
 
1159
@item name
1160
This is the name of the current function.  The index number is
1161
repeated after it.
1162
 
1163
If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number is
1164
printed between the function's name and the index number
1165
(@pxref{Cycles, ,How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described}).
1166
For example, if function @code{gnurr} is part of
1167
cycle number one, and has index number twelve, its primary line would
1168
be end like this:
1169
 
1170
@example
1171
gnurr <cycle 1> [12]
1172
@end example
1173
@end table
1174
 
1175
@node Callers
1176
@subsection Lines for a Function's Callers
1177
 
1178
A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by.
1179
These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but
1180
their meanings are different because of the difference in context.
1181
 
1182
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1183
@code{report}, the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together
1184
with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1185
 
1186
@smallexample
1187
index  % time    self  children called     name
1188
@dots{}
1189
                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1190
[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1191
@end smallexample
1192
 
1193
Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for @code{report}
1194
called from @code{main}:
1195
 
1196
@table @code
1197
@item self
1198
An estimate of the amount of time spent in @code{report} itself when it was
1199
called from @code{main}.
1200
 
1201
@item children
1202
An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1203
when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1204
 
1205
The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1206
of the amount of time spent within calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1207
 
1208
@item called
1209
Two numbers: the number of times @code{report} was called from @code{main},
1210
followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report} from
1211
all its callers.
1212
 
1213
@item name and index number
1214
The name of the caller of @code{report} to which this line applies,
1215
followed by the caller's index number.
1216
 
1217
Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some
1218
options to @code{gprof} request the omission of certain functions.
1219
When a caller has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines
1220
in the entries of the functions it calls.
1221
 
1222
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1223
printed between the name and the index number.
1224
@end table
1225
 
1226
If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a
1227
dummy caller-line is printed which has @samp{<spontaneous>} as the
1228
``caller's name'' and all other fields blank.  This can happen for
1229
signal handlers.
1230
@c What if some calls have determinable callers' names but not all?
1231
@c FIXME - still relevant?
1232
 
1233
@node Subroutines
1234
@subsection Lines for a Function's Subroutines
1235
 
1236
A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines---in other
1237
words, a line for each other function that it called.  These lines'
1238
fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings
1239
are different because of the difference in context.
1240
 
1241
For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1242
@code{main}, the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together
1243
with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1244
 
1245
@smallexample
1246
index  % time    self  children called     name
1247
@dots{}
1248
[2]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         main [2]
1249
                0.00    0.05       1/1           report [3]
1250
@end smallexample
1251
 
1252
Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for @code{main}
1253
calling @code{report}:
1254
 
1255
@table @code
1256
@item self
1257
An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within @code{report}
1258
when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1259
 
1260
@item children
1261
An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1262
when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1263
 
1264
The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1265
of the total time spent in calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1266
 
1267
@item called
1268
Two numbers, the number of calls to @code{report} from @code{main}
1269
followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report}.
1270
This ratio is used to determine how much of @code{report}'s @code{self}
1271
and @code{children} time gets credited to @code{main}.
1272
@xref{Assumptions, ,Estimating @code{children} Times}.
1273
 
1274
@item name
1275
The name of the subroutine of @code{main} to which this line applies,
1276
followed by the subroutine's index number.
1277
 
1278
If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1279
printed between the name and the index number.
1280
@end table
1281
 
1282
@node Cycles
1283
@subsection How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described
1284
@cindex cycle
1285
@cindex recursion cycle
1286
 
1287
The graph may be complicated by the presence of @dfn{cycles of
1288
recursion} in the call graph.  A cycle exists if a function calls
1289
another function that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to
1290
call) the original function.  For example: if @code{a} calls @code{b},
1291
and @code{b} calls @code{a}, then @code{a} and @code{b} form a cycle.
1292
 
1293
Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions, they
1294
belong to the same cycle.  If @code{a} and @code{b} call each other and
1295
@code{b} and @code{c} call each other, all three make one cycle.  Note that
1296
even if @code{b} only calls @code{a} if it was not called from @code{a},
1297
@code{gprof} cannot determine this, so @code{a} and @code{b} are still
1298
considered a cycle.
1299
 
1300
The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers.  When a function
1301
belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call graph
1302
it is followed by @samp{<cycle @var{number}>}.
1303
 
1304
The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the call
1305
graph paradoxical.  The ``time spent in children'' of @code{a} should
1306
include the time spent in its subroutine @code{b} and in @code{b}'s
1307
subroutines---but one of @code{b}'s subroutines is @code{a}!  How much of
1308
@code{a}'s time should be included in the children of @code{a}, when
1309
@code{a} is indirectly recursive?
1310
 
1311
The way @code{gprof} resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry
1312
for the cycle as a whole.  The primary line of this entry describes the
1313
total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle.  The
1314
``subroutines'' of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle, and
1315
all other functions that were called directly by them.  The ``callers'' of
1316
the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called functions in
1317
the cycle.
1318
 
1319
Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle containing
1320
functions @code{a} and @code{b}.  The cycle was entered by a call to
1321
@code{a} from @code{main}; both @code{a} and @code{b} called @code{c}.
1322
 
1323
@smallexample
1324
index  % time    self  children called     name
1325
----------------------------------------
1326
                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1327
[3]     91.71    1.77        0    1+5    <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1328
                 1.02        0    3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1329
                 0.75        0    2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1330
----------------------------------------
1331
                                  3          a <cycle 1> [5]
1332
[4]     52.85    1.02        0    0      b <cycle 1> [4]
1333
                                  2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1334
 
1335
----------------------------------------
1336
                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1337
                                  2          b <cycle 1> [4]
1338
[5]     38.86    0.75        0    1      a <cycle 1> [5]
1339
                                  3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1340
 
1341
----------------------------------------
1342
@end smallexample
1343
 
1344
@noindent
1345
(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry for
1346
@code{main}, which calls @code{a}, and an entry for @code{c}, with callers
1347
@code{a} and @code{b}.)
1348
 
1349
@smallexample
1350
index  % time    self  children called     name
1351
                                             <spontaneous>
1352
[1]    100.00       0     1.93    0      start [1]
1353
                 0.16     1.77    1/1        main [2]
1354
----------------------------------------
1355
                 0.16     1.77    1/1        start [1]
1356
[2]    100.00    0.16     1.77    1      main [2]
1357
                 1.77        0    1/1        a <cycle 1> [5]
1358
----------------------------------------
1359
                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1360
[3]     91.71    1.77        0    1+5    <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1361
                 1.02        0    3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1362
                 0.75        0    2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1363
 
1364
----------------------------------------
1365
                                  3          a <cycle 1> [5]
1366
[4]     52.85    1.02        0    0      b <cycle 1> [4]
1367
                                  2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1368
 
1369
----------------------------------------
1370
                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1371
                                  2          b <cycle 1> [4]
1372
[5]     38.86    0.75        0    1      a <cycle 1> [5]
1373
                                  3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1374
 
1375
----------------------------------------
1376
 
1377
 
1378
[6]      0.00       0        0    6      c [6]
1379
----------------------------------------
1380
@end smallexample
1381
 
1382
The @code{self} field of the cycle's primary line is the total time
1383
spent in all the functions of the cycle.  It equals the sum of the
1384
@code{self} fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found
1385
in the entry in the subroutine lines for these functions.
1386
 
1387
The @code{children} fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine lines
1388
count only subroutines outside the cycle.  Even though @code{a} calls
1389
@code{b}, the time spent in those calls to @code{b} is not counted in
1390
@code{a}'s @code{children} time.  Thus, we do not encounter the problem of
1391
what to do when the time in those calls to @code{b} includes indirect
1392
recursive calls back to @code{a}.
1393
 
1394
The @code{children} field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates
1395
the amount of time spent @emph{in the whole cycle}, and its other
1396
subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the cycle.
1397
 
1398
The @code{called} field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers:
1399
first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by functions
1400
outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were called by
1401
functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the cycle calls
1402
itself).  This is a generalization of the usual split into non-recursive and
1403
recursive calls.
1404
 
1405
The @code{called} field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the
1406
cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions in
1407
the cycle.  The total of all these is the second number in the primary line's
1408
@code{called} field.
1409
 
1410
In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other functions in
1411
the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers.  These lines show
1412
how many times each function in the cycle called or was called from each other
1413
function in the cycle.  The @code{self} and @code{children} fields in these
1414
lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining meanings for them
1415
when recursion is going on.
1416
 
1417
@node Line-by-line
1418
@section Line-by-line Profiling
1419
 
1420
@code{gprof}'s @samp{-l} option causes the program to perform
1421
@dfn{line-by-line} profiling.  In this mode, histogram
1422
samples are assigned not to functions, but to individual
1423
lines of source code.  This only works with programs compiled with
1424
older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler.  Newer versions of @code{gcc}
1425
use a different program - @code{gcov} - to display line-by-line
1426
profiling information.
1427
 
1428
With the older versions of @code{gcc} the program usually has to be
1429
compiled with a @samp{-g} option, in addition to @samp{-pg}, in order
1430
to generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines.
1431
Note, in much older versions of @code{gcc} the program had to be
1432
compiled with the @samp{-a} command line option as well.
1433
 
1434
The flat profile is the most useful output table
1435
in line-by-line mode.
1436
The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since
1437
the current version of @code{gprof} does not propagate
1438
call graph arcs from source code lines to the enclosing function.
1439
The call graph does, however, show each line of code
1440
that called each function, along with a count.
1441
 
1442
Here is a section of @code{gprof}'s output, without line-by-line profiling.
1443
Note that @code{ct_init} accounted for four histogram hits, and
1444
13327 calls to @code{init_block}.
1445
 
1446
@smallexample
1447
Flat profile:
1448
 
1449
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1450
  %   cumulative   self              self     total
1451
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  us/call  us/call  name
1452
 30.77      0.13     0.04     6335     6.31     6.31  ct_init
1453
 
1454
 
1455
                     Call graph (explanation follows)
1456
 
1457
 
1458
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1459
 
1460
index % time    self  children    called     name
1461
 
1462
                0.00    0.00       1/13496       name_too_long
1463
                0.00    0.00      40/13496       deflate
1464
                0.00    0.00     128/13496       deflate_fast
1465
                0.00    0.00   13327/13496       ct_init
1466
[7]      0.0    0.00    0.00   13496         init_block
1467
 
1468
@end smallexample
1469
 
1470
Now let's look at some of @code{gprof}'s output from the same program run,
1471
this time with line-by-line profiling enabled.  Note that @code{ct_init}'s
1472
four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code---one hit
1473
occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385.  In the call graph,
1474
note how
1475
@code{ct_init}'s 13327 calls to @code{init_block} are broken down
1476
into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls
1477
from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387.
1478
 
1479
@smallexample
1480
Flat profile:
1481
 
1482
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1483
  %   cumulative   self
1484
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  name
1485
  7.69      0.10     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:349)
1486
  7.69      0.11     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:351)
1487
  7.69      0.12     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:382)
1488
  7.69      0.13     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:385)
1489
 
1490
 
1491
                     Call graph (explanation follows)
1492
 
1493
 
1494
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1495
 
1496
  % time    self  children    called     name
1497
 
1498
            0.00    0.00       1/13496       name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
1499
            0.00    0.00       1/13496       deflate (deflate.c:763)
1500
            0.00    0.00       1/13496       ct_init (trees.c:396)
1501
            0.00    0.00       2/13496       deflate (deflate.c:727)
1502
            0.00    0.00       4/13496       deflate (deflate.c:686)
1503
            0.00    0.00       5/13496       deflate (deflate.c:675)
1504
            0.00    0.00      12/13496       deflate (deflate.c:679)
1505
            0.00    0.00      16/13496       deflate (deflate.c:730)
1506
            0.00    0.00     128/13496       deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
1507
            0.00    0.00    3071/13496       ct_init (trees.c:384)
1508
            0.00    0.00    3730/13496       ct_init (trees.c:385)
1509
            0.00    0.00    6525/13496       ct_init (trees.c:387)
1510
[6]  0.0    0.00    0.00   13496         init_block (trees.c:408)
1511
 
1512
@end smallexample
1513
 
1514
 
1515
@node Annotated Source
1516
@section The Annotated Source Listing
1517
 
1518
@code{gprof}'s @samp{-A} option triggers an annotated source listing,
1519
which lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the
1520
number of times it was called.  You may also need to specify the
1521
@samp{-I} option, if @code{gprof} can't find the source code files.
1522
 
1523
With older versions of @code{gcc} compiling with @samp{gcc @dots{} -g
1524
-pg -a} augments your program with basic-block counting code, in
1525
addition to function counting code.  This enables @code{gprof} to
1526
determine how many times each line of code was executed.  With newer
1527
versions of @code{gcc} support for displaying basic-block counts is
1528
provided by the @code{gcov} program.
1529
 
1530
For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip,
1531
with line numbers added:
1532
 
1533
@smallexample
1534
 1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
1535
 2     uch *s;
1536
 3     unsigned n;
1537
 4 @{
1538
 5     register ulg c;
1539
 6
1540
 7     static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1541
 8
1542
 9     if (s == NULL) @{
1543
10         c = 0xffffffffL;
1544
11     @} else @{
1545
12         c = crc;
1546
13         if (n) do @{
1547
14             c = crc_32_tab[...];
1548
15         @} while (--n);
1549
16     @}
1550
17     crc = c;
1551
18     return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
1552
19 @}
1553
 
1554
@end smallexample
1555
 
1556
@code{updcrc} has at least five basic-blocks.
1557
One is the function itself.  The
1558
@code{if} statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one
1559
for each branch of the @code{if}.  A fourth basic-block results from
1560
the @code{if} on line 13, and the contents of the @code{do} loop form
1561
the fifth basic-block.  The compiler may also generate additional
1562
basic-blocks to handle various special cases.
1563
 
1564
A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with
1565
@samp{gprof -l -A}.
1566
The @samp{-x} option is also helpful,
1567
to ensure that each line of code is labeled at least once.
1568
Here is @code{updcrc}'s
1569
annotated source listing for a sample @code{gzip} run:
1570
 
1571
@smallexample
1572
                ulg updcrc(s, n)
1573
                    uch *s;
1574
                    unsigned n;
1575
            2 ->@{
1576
                    register ulg c;
1577
 
1578
                    static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1579
 
1580
            2 ->    if (s == NULL) @{
1581
            1 ->        c = 0xffffffffL;
1582
            1 ->    @} else @{
1583
            1 ->        c = crc;
1584
            1 ->        if (n) do @{
1585
        26312 ->            c = crc_32_tab[...];
1586
26312,1,26311 ->        @} while (--n);
1587
                    @}
1588
            2 ->    crc = c;
1589
            2 ->    return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
1590
            2 ->@}
1591
@end smallexample
1592
 
1593
In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
1594
each branch of the @code{if} statement.  The body of the @code{do}
1595
loop was executed a total of 26312 times.  Note how the @code{while}
1596
statement is annotated.  It began execution 26312 times, once for
1597
each iteration through the loop.  One of those times (the last time)
1598
it exited, while it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.
1599
 
1600
@node Inaccuracy
1601
@chapter Inaccuracy of @code{gprof} Output
1602
 
1603
@menu
1604
* Sampling Error::      Statistical margins of error
1605
* Assumptions::         Estimating children times
1606
@end menu
1607
 
1608
@node Sampling Error
1609
@section Statistical Sampling Error
1610
 
1611
The run-time figures that @code{gprof} gives you are based on a sampling
1612
process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy.  If a function runs
1613
only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling process
1614
ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a pretty good
1615
chance it will actually find that function zero times, or twice.
1616
 
1617
By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
1618
by counting, not sampling.  They are completely accurate and will not
1619
vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single
1620
threaded.  In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded
1621
applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are
1622
only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe.  (Note:
1623
beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is @emph{not}
1624
thread-safe).  @xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
1625
 
1626
The @dfn{sampling period} that is printed at the beginning of the flat
1627
profile says how often samples are taken.  The rule of thumb is that a
1628
run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the sampling
1629
period.
1630
 
1631
The actual amount of error can be predicted.
1632
For @var{n} samples, the @emph{expected} error
1633
is the square-root of @var{n}.  For example,
1634
if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{foo}'s run-time is 1 second,
1635
@var{n} is 100 samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(@var{n}) is 10 samples, so
1636
the expected error in @code{foo}'s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds),
1637
or ten percent of the observed value.
1638
Again, if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{bar}'s run-time is
1639
100 seconds, @var{n} is 10000 samples, sqrt(@var{n}) is 100 samples, so
1640
the expected error in @code{bar}'s run-time is 1 second,
1641
or one percent of the observed value.
1642
It is likely to
1643
vary this much @emph{on the average} from one profiling run to the next.
1644
(@emph{Sometimes} it will vary more.)
1645
 
1646
This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of information.
1647
If the program's @emph{total} run-time is large, a small run-time for one
1648
function does tell you that that function used an insignificant fraction of
1649
the whole program's time.  Usually this means it is not worth optimizing.
1650
 
1651
One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but similar)
1652
input data so it will take longer.  Another way is to combine the data from
1653
several runs, using the @samp{-s} option of @code{gprof}.  Here is how:
1654
 
1655
@enumerate
1656
@item
1657
Run your program once.
1658
 
1659
@item
1660
Issue the command @samp{mv gmon.out gmon.sum}.
1661
 
1662
@item
1663
Run your program again, the same as before.
1664
 
1665
@item
1666
Merge the new data in @file{gmon.out} into @file{gmon.sum} with this command:
1667
 
1668
@example
1669
gprof -s @var{executable-file} gmon.out gmon.sum
1670
@end example
1671
 
1672
@item
1673
Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
1674
 
1675
@item
1676
Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
1677
 
1678
@example
1679
gprof @var{executable-file} gmon.sum > @var{output-file}
1680
@end example
1681
@end enumerate
1682
 
1683
@node Assumptions
1684
@section Estimating @code{children} Times
1685
 
1686
Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates---for example, the
1687
@code{children} time values and all the time figures in caller and
1688
subroutine lines.
1689
 
1690
There is no direct information about these measurements in the profile
1691
data itself.  Instead, @code{gprof} estimates them by making an assumption
1692
about your program that might or might not be true.
1693
 
1694
The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to any
1695
function @code{foo} is not correlated with who called @code{foo}.  If
1696
@code{foo} used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to @code{foo} came
1697
from @code{a}, then @code{foo} contributes 2 seconds to @code{a}'s
1698
@code{children} time, by assumption.
1699
 
1700
This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is far
1701
from true.  Suppose that @code{foo} returns very quickly when its argument
1702
is zero; suppose that @code{a} always passes zero as an argument, while
1703
other callers of @code{foo} pass other arguments.  In this program, all the
1704
time spent in @code{foo} is in the calls from callers other than @code{a}.
1705
But @code{gprof} has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and
1706
incorrectly charge 2 seconds of time in @code{foo} to the children of
1707
@code{a}.
1708
 
1709
@c FIXME - has this been fixed?
1710
We hope some day to put more complete data into @file{gmon.out}, so that
1711
this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how.  For the
1712
novice, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading.
1713
 
1714
@node How do I?
1715
@chapter Answers to Common Questions
1716
 
1717
@table @asis
1718
@item How can I get more exact information about hot spots in my program?
1719
 
1720
Looking at the per-line call counts only tells part of the story.
1721
Because @code{gprof} can only report call times and counts by function,
1722
the best way to get finer-grained information on where the program
1723
is spending its time is to re-factor large functions into sequences
1724
of calls to smaller ones.  Beware however that this can introduce
1725
artificial hot spots since compiling with @samp{-pg} adds a significant
1726
overhead to function calls.  An alternative solution is to use a
1727
non-intrusive profiler, e.g.@: oprofile.
1728
 
1729
@item How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times?
1730
 
1731
Use the @code{gcov} program.
1732
 
1733
@item How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function?
1734
 
1735
Use @samp{gprof -l} and lookup the function in the call graph.
1736
The callers will be broken down by function and line number.
1737
 
1738
@item How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second?
1739
 
1740
Try using a shell script like this one:
1741
 
1742
@example
1743
for i in `seq 1 100`; do
1744
  fastprog
1745
  mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i
1746
done
1747
 
1748
gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.*
1749
 
1750
gprof fastprog gmon.sum
1751
@end example
1752
 
1753
If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts
1754
will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e., a function called once in
1755
each run will appear with a call count of 100).
1756
 
1757
@end table
1758
 
1759
@node Incompatibilities
1760
@chapter Incompatibilities with Unix @code{gprof}
1761
 
1762
@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Berkeley Unix @code{gprof} use the same data
1763
file @file{gmon.out}, and provide essentially the same information.  But
1764
there are a few differences.
1765
 
1766
@itemize @bullet
1767
@item
1768
@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new, generalized file format with support
1769
for basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms.  A magic
1770
cookie and version number allows @code{gprof} to easily identify
1771
new style files.  Old BSD-style files can still be read.
1772
@xref{File Format, ,Profiling Data File Format}.
1773
 
1774
@item
1775
For a recursive function, Unix @code{gprof} lists the function as a
1776
parent and as a child, with a @code{calls} field that lists the number
1777
of recursive calls.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} omits these lines and puts
1778
the number of recursive calls in the primary line.
1779
 
1780
@item
1781
When a function is suppressed from the call graph with @samp{-e}, @sc{gnu}
1782
@code{gprof} still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it.
1783
 
1784
@item
1785
@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} accepts the @samp{-k} with its argument
1786
in the form @samp{from/to}, instead of @samp{from to}.
1787
 
1788
@item
1789
In the annotated source listing,
1790
if there are multiple basic blocks on the same line,
1791
@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} prints all of their counts, separated by commas.
1792
 
1793
@ignore - it does this now
1794
@item
1795
The function names printed in @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} output do not include
1796
the leading underscores that are added internally to the front of all
1797
C identifiers on many operating systems.
1798
@end ignore
1799
 
1800
@item
1801
The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different.  @sc{gnu}
1802
@code{gprof} prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the
1803
tables without skipping the blurbs.
1804
@end itemize
1805
 
1806
@node Details
1807
@chapter Details of Profiling
1808
 
1809
@menu
1810
* Implementation::      How a program collects profiling information
1811
* File Format::         Format of @samp{gmon.out} files
1812
* Internals::           @code{gprof}'s internal operation
1813
* Debugging::           Using @code{gprof}'s @samp{-d} option
1814
@end menu
1815
 
1816
@node Implementation
1817
@section Implementation of Profiling
1818
 
1819
Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is compiled
1820
so that when it is called, it will stash away some information about where
1821
it was called from.  From this, the profiler can figure out what function
1822
called it, and can count how many times it was called.  This change is made
1823
by the compiler when your program is compiled with the @samp{-pg} option,
1824
which causes every function to call @code{mcount}
1825
(or @code{_mcount}, or @code{__mcount}, depending on the OS and compiler)
1826
as one of its first operations.
1827
 
1828
The @code{mcount} routine, included in the profiling library,
1829
is responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table
1830
both its parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent.  This is
1831
typically done by examining the stack frame to find both
1832
the address of the child, and the return address in the original parent.
1833
Since this is a very machine-dependent operation, @code{mcount}
1834
itself is typically a short assembly-language stub routine
1835
that extracts the required
1836
information, and then calls @code{__mcount_internal}
1837
(a normal C function) with two arguments---@code{frompc} and @code{selfpc}.
1838
@code{__mcount_internal} is responsible for maintaining
1839
the in-memory call graph, which records @code{frompc}, @code{selfpc},
1840
and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed.
1841
 
1842
GCC Version 2 provides a magical function (@code{__builtin_return_address}),
1843
which allows a generic @code{mcount} function to extract the
1844
required information from the stack frame.  However, on some
1845
architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be
1846
very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version
1847
of @code{mcount} is used for performance reasons.
1848
 
1849
Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by using a
1850
special version of the C library.  The programs in it are the same as in
1851
the usual C library, but they were compiled with @samp{-pg}.  If you
1852
link your program with @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg}, it automatically uses the
1853
profiling version of the library.
1854
 
1855
Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping a
1856
histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and then.
1857
Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per second of
1858
run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to system.
1859
 
1860
This is done is one of two ways.  Most UNIX-like operating systems
1861
provide a @code{profil()} system call, which registers a memory
1862
array with the kernel, along with a scale
1863
factor that determines how the program's address space maps
1864
into the array.
1865
Typical scaling values cause every 2 to 8 bytes of address space
1866
to map into a single array slot.
1867
On every tick of the system clock
1868
(assuming the profiled program is running), the value of the
1869
program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in
1870
the memory array is incremented.  Since this is done in the kernel,
1871
which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock
1872
interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required.
1873
 
1874
However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and earlier),
1875
do not provide a @code{profil()} system call.  On such a system,
1876
arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver
1877
a signal to the process (typically via @code{setitimer()}),
1878
which then performs the same operation of examining the
1879
program counter and incrementing a slot in the memory array.
1880
Since this method requires a signal to be delivered to
1881
user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably
1882
more overhead than kernel-based profiling.  Also, due to the
1883
added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is
1884
less accurate as well.
1885
 
1886
A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and
1887
either calls @code{profil()} or sets up
1888
a clock signal handler.
1889
This routine (@code{monstartup}) can be invoked in several ways.
1890
On Linux systems, a special profiling startup file @code{gcrt0.o},
1891
which invokes @code{monstartup} before @code{main},
1892
is used instead of the default @code{crt0.o}.
1893
Use of this special startup file is one of the effects
1894
of using @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg} to link.
1895
On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used.
1896
Rather, the @code{mcount} routine, when it is invoked for
1897
the first time (typically when @code{main} is called),
1898
calls @code{monstartup}.
1899
 
1900
If the compiler's @samp{-a} option was used, basic-block counting
1901
is also enabled.  Each object file is then compiled with a static array
1902
of counts, initially zero.
1903
In the executable code, every time a new basic-block begins
1904
(i.e., when an @code{if} statement appears), an extra instruction
1905
is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the array.
1906
At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded
1907
the starting address of each basic-block.  Taken together,
1908
the two arrays record the starting address of every basic-block,
1909
along with the number of times it was executed.
1910
 
1911
The profiling library also includes a function (@code{mcleanup}) which is
1912
typically registered using @code{atexit()} to be called as the
1913
program exits, and is responsible for writing the file @file{gmon.out}.
1914
Profiling is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram
1915
is written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts.
1916
 
1917
The output from @code{gprof} gives no indication of parts of your program that
1918
are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth.  This is because samples of the
1919
program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run time.
1920
Therefore, the
1921
time measurements in @code{gprof} output say nothing about time that your
1922
program was not running.  For example, a part of the program that creates
1923
so much data that it cannot all fit in physical memory at once may run very
1924
slowly due to thrashing, but @code{gprof} will say it uses little time.  On
1925
the other hand, sampling by run time has the advantage that the amount of
1926
load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get.
1927
 
1928
@node File Format
1929
@section Profiling Data File Format
1930
 
1931
The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a
1932
magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really is a
1933
@code{gprof} file.  Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus
1934
rendering changes to the file format almost impossible.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof}
1935
uses a new file format that provides these features.  For backward
1936
compatibility, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} continues to support the old BSD-derived
1937
format, but not all features are supported with it.  For example,
1938
basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file
1939
format.
1940
 
1941
The new file format is defined in header file @file{gmon_out.h}.  It
1942
consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number,
1943
as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions.  All data
1944
in a profile data file is in the native format of the target for which
1945
the profile was collected.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} adapts automatically
1946
to the byte-order in use.
1947
 
1948
In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of
1949
records.  Currently, there are three different record types: histogram
1950
records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count
1951
records.  Each file can contain any number of each record type.  When
1952
reading a file, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} will ensure records of the same type are
1953
compatible with each other and compute the union of all records.  For
1954
example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum
1955
of all execution counts for each basic-block.
1956
 
1957
@subsection Histogram Records
1958
 
1959
Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of
1960
bins.  The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram
1961
spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD
1962
format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the
1963
profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts
1964
represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate.  The
1965
physical dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15
1966
characters and a single character abbreviation.  For example, a
1967
histogram representing real-time would specify the long name as
1968
``seconds'' and the abbreviation as ``s''.  This feature is useful for
1969
architectures that support performance monitor hardware (which,
1970
fortunately, is becoming increasingly common).  For example, under DEC
1971
OSF/1, the ``uprofile'' command can be used to produce a histogram of,
1972
say, instruction cache misses.  In this case, the dimension in the
1973
histogram header could be set to ``i-cache misses'' and the abbreviation
1974
could be set to ``1'' (because it is simply a count, not a physical
1975
dimension).  Also, the profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in
1976
this case.
1977
 
1978
Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal
1979
amount of text-space.  For example, if the text-segment is one
1980
thousand bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each
1981
bin represents one hundred bytes.
1982
 
1983
 
1984
@subsection Call-Graph Records
1985
 
1986
Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in
1987
the BSD-derived file format.  It consists of an arc in the call graph
1988
and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed
1989
during program execution.  Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses:
1990
the first must be within caller's function and the second must be
1991
within the callee's function.  When performing profiling at the
1992
function level, these addresses can point anywhere within the
1993
respective function.  However, when profiling at the line-level, it is
1994
better if the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as
1995
possible.  This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to
1996
identify exactly which line of source code performed calls to a
1997
function.
1998
 
1999
@subsection Basic-Block Execution Count Records
2000
 
2001
Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a
2002
sequence of address/count pairs.  The header simply specifies the
2003
length of the sequence.  In an address/count pair, the address
2004
identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times
2005
that basic-block was executed.  Any address within the basic-address can
2006
be used.
2007
 
2008
@node Internals
2009
@section @code{gprof}'s Internal Operation
2010
 
2011
Like most programs, @code{gprof} begins by processing its options.
2012
During this stage, it may building its symspec list
2013
(@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_add}), if
2014
options are specified which use symspecs.
2015
@code{gprof} maintains a single linked list of symspecs,
2016
which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables,
2017
organized into six include/exclude pairs---one
2018
pair each for the flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT),
2019
the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS),
2020
printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH),
2021
timing propagation in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME),
2022
the annotated source listing (INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO),
2023
and the execution count listing (INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC).
2024
 
2025
After option processing, @code{gprof} finishes
2026
building the symspec list by adding all the symspecs in
2027
@code{default_excluded_list} to the exclude lists
2028
EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is specified,
2029
EXCL_FLAT as well.
2030
These default excludes are not added to EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC.
2031
 
2032
Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file,
2033
verify that it is an object file,
2034
and read its symbol table (@code{core.c:@-core_init}),
2035
using @code{bfd_canonicalize_symtab} after mallocing
2036
an appropriately sized array of symbols.  At this point,
2037
function mappings are read (if the @samp{--file-ordering} option
2038
has been specified), and the core text space is read into
2039
memory (if the @samp{-c} option was given).
2040
 
2041
@code{gprof}'s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures,
2042
is now built.
2043
This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending
2044
on whether line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option) has been
2045
enabled.
2046
For normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned.
2047
For line-by-line profiling, every
2048
text space address is examined, and a new symbol table entry
2049
gets created every time the line number changes.
2050
In either case, two passes are made through the symbol
2051
table---one to count the size of the symbol table required,
2052
and the other to actually read the symbols.  In between the
2053
two passes, a single array of type @code{Sym} is created of
2054
the appropriate length.
2055
Finally, @code{symtab.c:@-symtab_finalize}
2056
is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries
2057
(entries with the same memory address).
2058
 
2059
The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons.
2060
First, the @code{qsort} library function (which sorts an array)
2061
will be used to sort the symbol table.
2062
Also, the symbol lookup routine (@code{symtab.c:@-sym_lookup}),
2063
which finds symbols
2064
based on memory address, uses a binary search algorithm
2065
which requires the symbol table to be a sorted array.
2066
Function symbols are indicated with an @code{is_func} flag.
2067
Line number symbols have no special flags set.
2068
Additionally, a symbol can have an @code{is_static} flag
2069
to indicate that it is a local symbol.
2070
 
2071
With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated
2072
into Syms (@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_parse}).  Remember that a single
2073
symspec can match multiple symbols.
2074
An array of symbol tables
2075
(@code{syms}) is created, each entry of which is a symbol table
2076
of Syms to be included or excluded from a particular listing.
2077
The master symbol table and the symspecs are examined by nested
2078
loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is inserted
2079
into the appropriate syms table.  This is done twice, once to
2080
count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build
2081
the tables, which have been malloced between passes.
2082
From now on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include
2083
or exclude symspec list, @code{gprof} simply uses its
2084
standard symbol lookup routine on the appropriate table
2085
in the @code{syms} array.
2086
 
2087
Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read
2088
(@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_read}),
2089
first by checking for a new-style @samp{gmon.out} header,
2090
then assuming this is an old-style BSD @samp{gmon.out}
2091
if the magic number test failed.
2092
 
2093
New-style histogram records are read by @code{hist.c:@-hist_read_rec}.
2094
For the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold
2095
all the bins, and read them in.
2096
When multiple profile data files (or files with multiple histogram
2097
records) are read, the memory ranges of each pair of histogram records
2098
must be either equal, or non-overlapping.  For each pair of histogram
2099
records, the resolution (memory region size divided by the number of
2100
bins) must be the same.  The time unit must be the same for all
2101
histogram records. If the above containts are met, all histograms
2102
for the same memory range are merged.
2103
 
2104
As each call graph record is read (@code{call_graph.c:@-cg_read_rec}),
2105
the parent and child addresses
2106
are matched to symbol table entries, and a call graph arc is
2107
created by @code{cg_arcs.c:@-arc_add}, unless the arc fails a symspec
2108
check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS.  As each arc is added,
2109
a linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's
2110
parent arcs.
2111
Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are
2112
incremented by the record's call count.
2113
 
2114
Basic-block records are read (@code{basic_blocks.c:@-bb_read_rec}),
2115
but only if line-by-line profiling has been selected.
2116
Each basic-block address is matched to a corresponding line
2117
symbol in the symbol table, and an entry made in the symbol's
2118
bb_addr and bb_calls arrays.  Again, if multiple basic-block
2119
records are present for the same address, the call counts
2120
are cumulative.
2121
 
2122
A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_write}).
2123
 
2124
If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols
2125
(@code{hist.c:@-hist_assign_samples}) by iterating over all the sample
2126
bins and assigning them to symbols.  Since the symbol table
2127
is sorted in order of ascending memory addresses, we can
2128
simple follow along in the symbol table as we make our pass
2129
over the sample bins.
2130
This step includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT.
2131
Depending on the histogram
2132
scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols,
2133
in which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated
2134
to each symbol, proportional to the degree of overlap.
2135
This effect is rare for normal profiling, but overlaps
2136
are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can
2137
cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half
2138
a hit, for example.
2139
 
2140
If call graph data is present, @code{cg_arcs.c:@-cg_assemble} is called.
2141
First, if @samp{-c} was specified, a machine-dependent
2142
routine (@code{find_call}) scans through each symbol's machine code,
2143
looking for subroutine call instructions, and adding them
2144
to the call graph with a zero call count.
2145
A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering
2146
all the symbols (@code{cg_dfn.c:@-cg_dfn}), so that
2147
children are always numbered less than their parents,
2148
then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and sorting it into
2149
numerical order, which is reverse topological
2150
order (children appear before parents).
2151
Cycles are also detected at this point, all members
2152
of which are assigned the same topological number.
2153
Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers.
2154
The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children),
2155
computes the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent
2156
and a print flag.
2157
The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH,
2158
with a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property
2159
being propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear
2160
in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH.
2161
A second pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually
2162
propagates the timings along the call graph, subject
2163
to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME.
2164
With the print flag, fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol
2165
structures, the topological sort array is now discarded, and a
2166
new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted by propagated time.
2167
 
2168
Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now fairly
2169
straightforward.  The call graph (@code{cg_print.c:@-cg_print}) and
2170
flat profile (@code{hist.c:@-hist_print}) are regurgitations of values
2171
already computed.  The annotated source listing
2172
(@code{basic_blocks.c:@-print_annotated_source}) uses basic-block
2173
information, if present, to label each line of code with call counts,
2174
otherwise only the function call counts are presented.
2175
 
2176
The function ordering code is marginally well documented
2177
in the source code itself (@code{cg_print.c}).  Basically,
2178
the functions with the most use and the most parents are
2179
placed first, followed by other functions with the most use,
2180
followed by lower use functions, followed by unused functions
2181
at the end.
2182
 
2183
@node Debugging
2184
@section Debugging @code{gprof}
2185
 
2186
If @code{gprof} was compiled with debugging enabled,
2187
the @samp{-d} option triggers debugging output
2188
(to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its operation.
2189
The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of the following
2190
options:
2191
 
2192
@table @asis
2193
@item 2 - Topological sort
2194
Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis
2195
@item 4 - Cycles
2196
Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads
2197
@item 16 - Tallying
2198
As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how
2199
the total calls to each function are tallied
2200
@item 32 - Call graph arc sorting
2201
Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph entry
2202
@item 64 - Reading histogram and call graph records
2203
Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each
2204
call graph arc
2205
@item 128 - Symbol table
2206
Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object file.
2207
For line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option), also shows line numbers
2208
being assigned to memory addresses.
2209
@item 256 - Static call graph
2210
Trace operation of @samp{-c} option
2211
@item 512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups
2212
Detail operation of lookup routines
2213
@item 1024 - Call graph propagation
2214
Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph
2215
@item 2048 - Basic-blocks
2216
Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data
2217
(only meaningful with @samp{-l} option)
2218
@item 4096 - Symspecs
2219
Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation
2220
@item 8192 - Annotate source
2221
Tracks operation of @samp{-A} option
2222
@end table
2223
 
2224
@node GNU Free Documentation License
2225
@appendix GNU Free Documentation License
2226
@include fdl.texi
2227
 
2228
@bye
2229
 
2230
NEEDS AN INDEX
2231
 
2232
-T - "traditional BSD style": How is it different?  Should the
2233
differences be documented?
2234
 
2235
example flat file adds up to 100.01%...
2236
 
2237
note: time estimates now only go out to one decimal place (0.0), where
2238
they used to extend two (78.67).

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.