OpenCores
First Prev 2/2 no use no use
a few questions
by Unknown on Mar 10, 2004
Not available!
Trust me, I think might be easier to change the official value ;-) Anyway you can change the manual if you want. You take it fro mthe CVS, change the value and put it back in the cvs. regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johan Rydberg" jrydberg@night.trouble.net> To: "List about OpenRISC project" openrisc@opencores.org> Cc: lampret@opencores.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:44 PM Subject: Re: [openrisc] a few questions
"Damjan Lampret" lampret@opencores.org> wrote: : > well i'm not sure which one is really official. does anyone know : > of offical registry or something. anyway if you 'change' it to 92 let

me
: > know to fix it in uclinux & linux or they woun't work anymore.
: > also all existing binaries will need to be recompiled...
:
: And don't forget the openrisc arch manual. It also says describes the

ELF.
: Use whatever is in the manual. I hate to keep changing the manual. I

think
: the manual uses Johan's number but not sure. No, it uses 0x8472. Isn't it better to use the official value and change the manual? If you hate it so much I could do the changes (provided that OpenOffice can write valid MS Word files.) -- Johan Rydberg, Free Software Developer, Sweden http://rtmk.sf.net | http://www.nongnu.org/guss/ Playing Incubus - 11am




a few questions
by Unknown on Mar 10, 2004
Not available!
Matjaz Breskvar phoenix@opencores.org> wrote: : > >From include/elf/common.h: : > : > #define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */ : > : > A few lines below that: : > : > /* (Deprecated) Temporary number for the OpenRISC processor. */ : > #define EM_OR32 0x8472 : well i'm not sure which one is really official. does anyone know : of offical registry or something. anyway if you 'change' it to 92 let me : know to fix it in uclinux & linux or they woun't work anymore. : also all existing binaries will need to be recompiled... The official value should be 92 since I registered it with Caldera. Ther is a comment in the file: /* If it is necessary to assign new unofficial EM_* values, please pick large random numbers (0x8523, 0xa7f2, etc.) to minimize the chances of collision with official or non-GNU unofficial values. [...] Normally, each entity or maintainer responsible for a machine with an unofficial e_machine number should eventually ask registry@caldera.com for an officially blessed number to be added to the list above. */ And 0x8472 seem very random to me :) -- Johan Rydberg, Free Software Developer, Sweden http://rtmk.sf.net | http://www.nongnu.org/guss/ Playing Frost - Alphabet
a few questions
by Unknown on Mar 10, 2004
Not available!
"Damjan Lampret" lampret@opencores.org> wrote: : > well i'm not sure which one is really official. does anyone know : > of offical registry or something. anyway if you 'change' it to 92 let me : > know to fix it in uclinux & linux or they woun't work anymore. : > also all existing binaries will need to be recompiled... : : And don't forget the openrisc arch manual. It also says describes the ELF. : Use whatever is in the manual. I hate to keep changing the manual. I think : the manual uses Johan's number but not sure. No, it uses 0x8472. Isn't it better to use the official value and change the manual? If you hate it so much I could do the changes (provided that OpenOffice can write valid MS Word files.) -- Johan Rydberg, Free Software Developer, Sweden http://rtmk.sf.net | http://www.nongnu.org/guss/ Playing Incubus - 11am
First Prev 2/2 no use no use
© copyright 1999-2025 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.