| 1 |
15 |
khays |
========= Binutils Maintainers =========
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
|
| 4 |
|
|
of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
|
| 5 |
|
|
the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
|
| 6 |
|
|
programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
|
| 7 |
|
|
opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
|
| 8 |
|
|
GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
|
| 9 |
|
|
shared amoungst the projects.
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
The home page for binutils is:
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
and patches should be sent to:
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
binutils@sourceware.org
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
|
| 20 |
|
|
top level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
|
| 21 |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
|
and not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top level
|
| 25 |
|
|
configure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) should
|
| 26 |
|
|
be sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdb
|
| 27 |
|
|
lists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and
|
| 28 |
|
|
gdb-patches@sourceware.org).
|
| 29 |
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
|
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
|
| 31 |
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
|
The following people have permission to check patches into the
|
| 33 |
|
|
repository without obtaining approval first:
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
|
Nick Clifton (head maintainer)
|
| 36 |
|
|
Richard Henderson
|
| 37 |
|
|
Ian Lance Taylor
|
| 38 |
|
|
Jeff Law
|
| 39 |
|
|
Jim Wilson
|
| 40 |
|
|
DJ Delorie
|
| 41 |
|
|
Alan Modra
|
| 42 |
|
|
Michael Meissner
|
| 43 |
|
|
Daniel Jacobowitz
|
| 44 |
|
|
Richard Sandiford
|
| 45 |
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
|
--------- Maintainers ---------
|
| 47 |
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
|
Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
|
| 49 |
|
|
permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
|
| 50 |
|
|
that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
|
| 51 |
|
|
the immediate domain that they maintain.
|
| 52 |
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
|
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
|
| 54 |
|
|
falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
|
| 55 |
|
|
maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
|
| 56 |
|
|
maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
|
| 57 |
|
|
responsibility among the other maintainers.
|
| 58 |
|
|
|
| 59 |
|
|
ALPHA Richard Henderson
|
| 60 |
|
|
ARM Nick Clifton
|
| 61 |
|
|
ARM Richard Earnshaw
|
| 62 |
|
|
ARM Paul Brook
|
| 63 |
|
|
ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell
|
| 64 |
|
|
AVR Denis Chertykov
|
| 65 |
|
|
AVR Marek Michalkiewicz
|
| 66 |
|
|
BFIN Jie Zhang
|
| 67 |
|
|
BFIN Bernd Schmidt
|
| 68 |
|
|
BFIN Mike Frysinger
|
| 69 |
|
|
BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz
|
| 70 |
|
|
CR16 M R Swami Reddy
|
| 71 |
|
|
CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson
|
| 72 |
|
|
CRX M R Swami Reddy
|
| 73 |
|
|
DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias
|
| 74 |
|
|
DWARF2 Jason Merrill
|
| 75 |
|
|
DWARF2 Jakub Jelinek
|
| 76 |
|
|
FR30 Dave Brolley
|
| 77 |
|
|
FRV Dave Brolley
|
| 78 |
|
|
FRV Alexandre Oliva
|
| 79 |
|
|
H8300 Prafulla Thakare
|
| 80 |
|
|
HPPA Dave Anglin
|
| 81 |
|
|
HPPA elf32 Alan Modra
|
| 82 |
|
|
HPPA elf64 Jeff Law [Basic maintainance only]
|
| 83 |
|
|
IA-64 Jim Wilson
|
| 84 |
|
|
IQ2000 Stan Cox
|
| 85 |
|
|
i860 Jason Eckhardt
|
| 86 |
|
|
ix86 H.J. Lu
|
| 87 |
|
|
ix86 PE Christopher Faylor
|
| 88 |
|
|
ix86 COFF DJ Delorie
|
| 89 |
|
|
ix86 PE/COFF Dave Korn
|
| 90 |
|
|
ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich
|
| 91 |
|
|
LM32 Jon Beniston
|
| 92 |
|
|
M32R Doug Evans
|
| 93 |
|
|
M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez
|
| 94 |
|
|
M88k Mark Kettenis
|
| 95 |
|
|
MACH-O Tristan Gingold
|
| 96 |
|
|
MAXQ Inderpreet Singh
|
| 97 |
|
|
MEP Dave Brolley
|
| 98 |
|
|
MICROBLAZE Michael Eager
|
| 99 |
|
|
MIPS Eric Christopher
|
| 100 |
|
|
MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson
|
| 101 |
|
|
MN10300 Eric Christopher
|
| 102 |
|
|
MN10300 Alexandre Oliva
|
| 103 |
|
|
Moxie Anthony Green
|
| 104 |
|
|
MSP430 Dmitry Diky
|
| 105 |
|
|
NetBSD support Matt Thomas
|
| 106 |
|
|
Open8 Kirk Hays
|
| 107 |
|
|
PPC Geoff Keating
|
| 108 |
|
|
PPC Alan Modra
|
| 109 |
|
|
PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez
|
| 110 |
|
|
RX DJ Delorie
|
| 111 |
|
|
RX Nick Clifton
|
| 112 |
|
|
s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky
|
| 113 |
|
|
SCORE Mei Ligang
|
| 114 |
|
|
SH Alexandre Oliva
|
| 115 |
|
|
SH Kaz Kojima
|
| 116 |
|
|
SPARC Jakub Jelinek
|
| 117 |
|
|
SPU Alan Modra
|
| 118 |
|
|
TIC4X Svein Seldal
|
| 119 |
|
|
TIC54X Timothy Wall
|
| 120 |
|
|
TIC6X Joseph Myers
|
| 121 |
|
|
VAX Matt Thomas
|
| 122 |
|
|
VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw
|
| 123 |
|
|
VMS Tristan Gingold
|
| 124 |
|
|
x86_64 Jan Hubicka
|
| 125 |
|
|
x86_64 Andreas Jaeger
|
| 126 |
|
|
x86_64 H.J. Lu
|
| 127 |
|
|
XCOFF Richard Sandiford
|
| 128 |
|
|
Xtensa Sterling Augustine
|
| 129 |
|
|
z80 Arnold Metselaar
|
| 130 |
|
|
z8k Christian Groessler
|
| 131 |
|
|
|
| 132 |
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
|
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
|
| 134 |
|
|
|
| 135 |
|
|
CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
|
| 136 |
|
|
disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
|
| 137 |
|
|
It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
|
| 138 |
|
|
is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
|
| 139 |
|
|
CGEN and the files that it creates.
|
| 140 |
|
|
|
| 141 |
|
|
If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
|
| 142 |
|
|
|
| 143 |
|
|
cgen@sourceware.org
|
| 144 |
|
|
|
| 145 |
|
|
The current CGEN maintainers are:
|
| 146 |
|
|
|
| 147 |
|
|
Doug Evans, Frank Eigler
|
| 148 |
|
|
|
| 149 |
|
|
--------- Write After Approval ---------
|
| 150 |
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
|
Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
|
| 152 |
|
|
changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
|
| 153 |
|
|
one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
|
| 154 |
|
|
|
| 155 |
|
|
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
| 156 |
|
|
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
|
| 157 |
|
|
remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
| 158 |
|
|
|
| 159 |
|
|
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
|
| 160 |
|
|
|
| 161 |
|
|
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
|
| 162 |
|
|
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
|
| 163 |
|
|
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
|
| 164 |
|
|
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
|
| 165 |
|
|
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
|
| 166 |
|
|
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
| 167 |
|
|
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
| 168 |
|
|
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
| 169 |
|
|
|
| 170 |
|
|
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
|
| 171 |
|
|
|
| 172 |
|
|
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
|
| 173 |
|
|
also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
|
| 174 |
|
|
only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
|
| 175 |
|
|
ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
|
| 176 |
|
|
burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
|
| 177 |
|
|
great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
|
| 178 |
|
|
the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
|
| 179 |
|
|
|
| 180 |
|
|
Tristan Gingold
|
| 181 |
|
|
|
| 182 |
|
|
-------- Testsuites ---------------
|
| 183 |
|
|
|
| 184 |
|
|
In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should be
|
| 185 |
|
|
considered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list for
|
| 186 |
|
|
approval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility the
|
| 187 |
|
|
relevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.
|
| 188 |
|
|
Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-priveleges
|
| 189 |
|
|
person.
|
| 190 |
|
|
|
| 191 |
|
|
-------- Configure patches ----------
|
| 192 |
|
|
|
| 193 |
|
|
Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)
|
| 194 |
|
|
are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approved
|
| 195 |
|
|
by the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the config
|
| 196 |
|
|
maintainer at:
|
| 197 |
|
|
|
| 198 |
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
| 199 |
|
|
|
| 200 |
|
|
--------- Creating Branches ---------
|
| 201 |
|
|
|
| 202 |
|
|
Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branch
|
| 203 |
|
|
to use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSF
|
| 204 |
|
|
policies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from people
|
| 205 |
|
|
with appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legal
|
| 206 |
|
|
requirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equally
|
| 207 |
|
|
to contributions on a branch.
|
| 208 |
|
|
|
| 209 |
|
|
Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch of
|
| 210 |
|
|
the form:
|
| 211 |
|
|
|
| 212 |
|
|
binutils--
|
| 213 |
|
|
|
| 214 |
|
|
where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initials
|
| 215 |
|
|
if you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch created
|
| 216 |
|
|
by The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for
|
| 217 |
|
|
"org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choice
|
| 218 |
|
|
for "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so
|
| 219 |
|
|
"name" may contain additional hyphens.
|
| 220 |
|
|
|
| 221 |
|
|
Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop a
|
| 222 |
|
|
port of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriate
|
| 223 |
|
|
choice of branch name would be:
|
| 224 |
|
|
|
| 225 |
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm
|
| 226 |
|
|
|
| 227 |
|
|
A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some
|
| 228 |
|
|
organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you
|
| 229 |
|
|
should follow these rules:
|
| 230 |
|
|
|
| 231 |
|
|
1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.
|
| 232 |
|
|
|
| 233 |
|
|
2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.
|
| 234 |
|
|
|
| 235 |
|
|
For example:
|
| 236 |
|
|
|
| 237 |
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm_20050101
|
| 238 |
|
|
|
| 239 |
|
|
would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.
|
| 240 |
|
|
|
| 241 |
|
|
Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:
|
| 242 |
|
|
|
| 243 |
|
|
1. Check out binutils, so that you have a CVS checkout corresponding
|
| 244 |
|
|
to the initial state of your branch.
|
| 245 |
|
|
|
| 246 |
|
|
2. Create a tag:
|
| 247 |
|
|
|
| 248 |
|
|
cvs tag binutils---branchpoint
|
| 249 |
|
|
|
| 250 |
|
|
That tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what's
|
| 251 |
|
|
changed on the branch relative to the initial state.
|
| 252 |
|
|
|
| 253 |
|
|
3. Create the branch:
|
| 254 |
|
|
|
| 255 |
|
|
cvs rtag -b -r binutils---branchpoint \
|
| 256 |
|
|
binutils---branch
|
| 257 |
|
|
|
| 258 |
|
|
4. Document the branch:
|
| 259 |
|
|
|
| 260 |
|
|
Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and check
|
| 261 |
|
|
that file in. All branch descriptions should be added to the
|
| 262 |
|
|
HEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modify
|
| 263 |
|
|
binutils/BRANCHES on a branch!
|
| 264 |
|
|
|
| 265 |
|
|
Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not create
|
| 266 |
|
|
without the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
|