OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_2011-10-31/openrisc_2011-10-31/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc_2011-10-31

[/] [openrisc/] [tags/] [gnu-src/] [gcc-4.5.1/] [gcc-4.5.1-or32-1.0rc2/] [gcc/] [testsuite/] [gcc.dg/] [tree-ssa/] [loop-4.c] - Blame information for rev 384

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 298 jeremybenn
/* A test for strength reduction and induction variable elimination.  */
2
 
3
/* { dg-do compile } */
4
/* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
5
/* { dg-require-effective-target size32plus } */
6
 
7
/* Size of this structure should be sufficiently weird so that no memory
8
   addressing mode applies.  */
9
 
10
struct bla
11
{
12
  char x[187];
13
  int y;
14
  char z[253];
15
} arr_base[100];
16
 
17
int foo(void);
18
 
19
void xxx(void)
20
{
21
  int iter;
22
 
23
  for (iter = 0; iter < 100; iter++)
24
    arr_base[iter].y = foo ();
25
}
26
 
27
/* Access to arr_base[iter].y should be strength reduced.  Depending on
28
   whether we have an addressing mode of type [base + offset], one of the
29
   following forms might get chosen:
30
 
31
   -- induction variable with base &arr_base[0].y, the memory access of
32
      form *iv = ...
33
   -- induction variable with base 0, the memory access of form
34
      *(iv + &arr_base[0].y) = ...
35
 
36
   In any case, we should not have any multiplication.  */
37
 
38
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\* \[^\\n\\r\]*=" 0 "optimized" } } */
39
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\[^\\n\\r\]*= \\* " 0 "optimized" } } */
40
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MEM" 1 "optimized" } } */
41
 
42
/* And the original induction variable should be eliminated.  */
43
 
44
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "iter" 0 "optimized" } } */
45
 
46
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.