Subversion Repositories openrisc_2011-10-31

c { dg-do compile }

* Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:12:51 +0200

* From: Jean-Paul Jeannot <jeannot@gx-tech.fr>

* Organization: GX Technology France

* To: egcs-bugs@cygnus.com

* Subject: identified bug in g77 on Alpha

*

* Dear Sir,

*

* You will find below the assembly code of a simple Fortran routine which

* crashes with segmentation fault when storing the first element

*       in( jT_f-hd_T     ) = Xsp

* whereas everything is fine when commenting this line.

*

* The assembly code (generated with

* -ffast-math -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-inline

* or with -O5)

* uses a zapnot instruction to copy an address.

* BUT the zapnot parameter is 15 (copuing 4 bytes) instead of 255 (to copy

* 8 bytes).

*

* I guess this is typically a 64 bit issue. As, from my understanding,

* zapnots are used a lot to copy registers, this may create problems

* elsewhere.

*

* Thanks for your help

*

* Jean-Paul Jeannot

*

      subroutine simul_trace( in, Xsp, Ysp, Xrcv, Yrcv )

c   Next declaration added on transfer to gfortran testsuite

      integer hd_S, hd_Z, hd_T

      common /Idim/ jT_f, jT_l, nT, nT_dim

      common /Idim/ jZ_f, jZ_l, nZ, nZ_dim

      common /Idim/ jZ2_f, jZ2_l, nZ2, nZ2_dim

      common /Idim/ jzs_f, jzs_l, nzs, nzs_dim, l_amp

      common /Idim/ hd_S, hd_Z, hd_T

      common /Idim/ nlay, nlayz

      common /Idim/ n_work

      common /Idim/ nb_calls

      real Xsp, Ysp, Xrcv, Yrcv

      real in( jT_f-hd_T : jT_l )

      in( jT_f-hd_T     ) = Xsp

      in( jT_f-hd_T + 1 ) = Ysp

      in( jT_f-hd_T + 2 ) = Xrcv

      in( jT_f-hd_T + 3 ) = Yrcv

      end