1 |
706 |
jeremybenn |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 |
|
|
-- --
|
3 |
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
4 |
|
|
-- --
|
5 |
|
|
-- B I N D E --
|
6 |
|
|
-- --
|
7 |
|
|
-- B o d y --
|
8 |
|
|
-- --
|
9 |
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2010, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
10 |
|
|
-- --
|
11 |
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
12 |
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
13 |
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
14 |
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
15 |
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
16 |
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
17 |
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
18 |
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
19 |
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
20 |
|
|
-- --
|
21 |
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
22 |
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
23 |
|
|
-- --
|
24 |
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
with Binderr; use Binderr;
|
27 |
|
|
with Butil; use Butil;
|
28 |
|
|
with Debug; use Debug;
|
29 |
|
|
with Fname; use Fname;
|
30 |
|
|
with Namet; use Namet;
|
31 |
|
|
with Opt; use Opt;
|
32 |
|
|
with Osint;
|
33 |
|
|
with Output; use Output;
|
34 |
|
|
with Targparm; use Targparm;
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
with System.Case_Util; use System.Case_Util;
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
package body Binde is
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
-- The following data structures are used to represent the graph that is
|
41 |
|
|
-- used to determine the elaboration order (using a topological sort).
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
-- The following structures are used to record successors. If A is a
|
44 |
|
|
-- successor of B in this table, it means that A must be elaborated
|
45 |
|
|
-- before B is elaborated.
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
type Successor_Id is new Nat;
|
48 |
|
|
-- Identification of single successor entry
|
49 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
No_Successor : constant Successor_Id := 0;
|
51 |
|
|
-- Used to indicate end of list of successors
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
type Elab_All_Id is new Nat;
|
54 |
|
|
-- Identification of Elab_All entry link
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
No_Elab_All_Link : constant Elab_All_Id := 0;
|
57 |
|
|
-- Used to indicate end of list
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
-- Succ_Reason indicates the reason for a particular elaboration link
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
type Succ_Reason is
|
62 |
|
|
(Withed,
|
63 |
|
|
-- After directly with's Before, so the spec of Before must be
|
64 |
|
|
-- elaborated before After is elaborated.
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Elab,
|
67 |
|
|
-- After directly mentions Before in a pragma Elaborate, so the
|
68 |
|
|
-- body of Before must be elaborate before After is elaborated.
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Elab_All,
|
71 |
|
|
-- After either mentions Before directly in a pragma Elaborate_All,
|
72 |
|
|
-- or mentions a third unit, X, which itself requires that Before be
|
73 |
|
|
-- elaborated before unit X is elaborated. The Elab_All_Link list
|
74 |
|
|
-- traces the dependencies in the latter case.
|
75 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Elab_All_Desirable,
|
77 |
|
|
-- This is just like Elab_All, except that the elaborate all was not
|
78 |
|
|
-- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
|
79 |
|
|
-- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Elab_Desirable,
|
82 |
|
|
-- This is just like Elab, except that the elaborate was not
|
83 |
|
|
-- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
|
84 |
|
|
-- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
|
85 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Spec_First);
|
87 |
|
|
-- After is a body, and Before is the corresponding spec
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
-- Successor_Link contains the information for one link
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
type Successor_Link is record
|
92 |
|
|
Before : Unit_Id;
|
93 |
|
|
-- Predecessor unit
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
After : Unit_Id;
|
96 |
|
|
-- Successor unit
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Next : Successor_Id;
|
99 |
|
|
-- Next successor on this list
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Reason : Succ_Reason;
|
102 |
|
|
-- Reason for this link
|
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
Elab_Body : Boolean;
|
105 |
|
|
-- Set True if this link is needed for the special Elaborate_Body
|
106 |
|
|
-- processing described below.
|
107 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
Reason_Unit : Unit_Id;
|
109 |
|
|
-- For Reason = Elab, or Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, records the unit
|
110 |
|
|
-- containing the pragma leading to the link.
|
111 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
Elab_All_Link : Elab_All_Id;
|
113 |
|
|
-- If Reason = Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, then this points to the
|
114 |
|
|
-- first elment in a list of Elab_All entries that record the with
|
115 |
|
|
-- chain leading resulting in this particular dependency.
|
116 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
end record;
|
118 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
-- Note on handling of Elaborate_Body. Basically, if we have a pragma
|
120 |
|
|
-- Elaborate_Body in a unit, it means that the spec and body have to
|
121 |
|
|
-- be handled as a single entity from the point of view of determining
|
122 |
|
|
-- an elaboration order. What we do is to essentially remove the body
|
123 |
|
|
-- from consideration completely, and transfer all its links (other
|
124 |
|
|
-- than the spec link) to the spec. Then when then the spec gets chosen,
|
125 |
|
|
-- we choose the body right afterwards. We mark the links that get moved
|
126 |
|
|
-- from the body to the spec by setting their Elab_Body flag True, so
|
127 |
|
|
-- that we can understand what is going on!
|
128 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
Succ_First : constant := 1;
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
package Succ is new Table.Table (
|
132 |
|
|
Table_Component_Type => Successor_Link,
|
133 |
|
|
Table_Index_Type => Successor_Id,
|
134 |
|
|
Table_Low_Bound => Succ_First,
|
135 |
|
|
Table_Initial => 500,
|
136 |
|
|
Table_Increment => 200,
|
137 |
|
|
Table_Name => "Succ");
|
138 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
-- For the case of Elaborate_All, the following table is used to record
|
140 |
|
|
-- chains of with relationships that lead to the Elab_All link. These
|
141 |
|
|
-- are used solely for diagnostic purposes
|
142 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
type Elab_All_Entry is record
|
144 |
|
|
Needed_By : Unit_Name_Type;
|
145 |
|
|
-- Name of unit from which referencing unit was with'ed or otherwise
|
146 |
|
|
-- needed as a result of Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable.
|
147 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Next_Elab : Elab_All_Id;
|
149 |
|
|
-- Link to next entry on chain (No_Elab_All_Link marks end of list)
|
150 |
|
|
end record;
|
151 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
package Elab_All_Entries is new Table.Table (
|
153 |
|
|
Table_Component_Type => Elab_All_Entry,
|
154 |
|
|
Table_Index_Type => Elab_All_Id,
|
155 |
|
|
Table_Low_Bound => 1,
|
156 |
|
|
Table_Initial => 2000,
|
157 |
|
|
Table_Increment => 200,
|
158 |
|
|
Table_Name => "Elab_All_Entries");
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
-- A Unit_Node record is built for each active unit
|
161 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
type Unit_Node_Record is record
|
163 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
Successors : Successor_Id;
|
165 |
|
|
-- Pointer to list of links for successor nodes
|
166 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
Num_Pred : Int;
|
168 |
|
|
-- Number of predecessors for this unit. Normally non-negative, but
|
169 |
|
|
-- can go negative in the case of units chosen by the diagnose error
|
170 |
|
|
-- procedure (when cycles are being removed from the graph).
|
171 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Nextnp : Unit_Id;
|
173 |
|
|
-- Forward pointer for list of units with no predecessors
|
174 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
Elab_Order : Nat;
|
176 |
|
|
-- Position in elaboration order (zero = not placed yet)
|
177 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
Visited : Boolean;
|
179 |
|
|
-- Used in computing transitive closure for elaborate all and
|
180 |
|
|
-- also in locating cycles and paths in the diagnose routines.
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
Elab_Position : Natural;
|
183 |
|
|
-- Initialized to zero. Set non-zero when a unit is chosen and
|
184 |
|
|
-- placed in the elaboration order. The value represents the
|
185 |
|
|
-- ordinal position in the elaboration order.
|
186 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
end record;
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
package UNR is new Table.Table (
|
190 |
|
|
Table_Component_Type => Unit_Node_Record,
|
191 |
|
|
Table_Index_Type => Unit_Id,
|
192 |
|
|
Table_Low_Bound => First_Unit_Entry,
|
193 |
|
|
Table_Initial => 500,
|
194 |
|
|
Table_Increment => 200,
|
195 |
|
|
Table_Name => "UNR");
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
No_Pred : Unit_Id;
|
198 |
|
|
-- Head of list of items with no predecessors
|
199 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Num_Left : Int;
|
201 |
|
|
-- Number of entries not yet dealt with
|
202 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
Cur_Unit : Unit_Id;
|
204 |
|
|
-- Current unit, set by Gather_Dependencies, and picked up in Build_Link
|
205 |
|
|
-- to set the Reason_Unit field of the created dependency link.
|
206 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
Num_Chosen : Natural := 0;
|
208 |
|
|
-- Number of units chosen in the elaboration order so far
|
209 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
-----------------------
|
211 |
|
|
-- Local Subprograms --
|
212 |
|
|
-----------------------
|
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
|
215 |
|
|
-- U1 and U2 are both permitted candidates for selection as the next unit
|
216 |
|
|
-- to be elaborated. This function determines whether U1 is a better choice
|
217 |
|
|
-- than U2, i.e. should be elaborated in preference to U2, based on a set
|
218 |
|
|
-- of heuristics that establish a friendly and predictable order (see body
|
219 |
|
|
-- for details). The result is True if U1 is a better choice than U2, and
|
220 |
|
|
-- False if it is a worse choice, or there is no preference between them.
|
221 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
procedure Build_Link
|
223 |
|
|
(Before : Unit_Id;
|
224 |
|
|
After : Unit_Id;
|
225 |
|
|
R : Succ_Reason;
|
226 |
|
|
Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link);
|
227 |
|
|
-- Establish a successor link, Before must be elaborated before After, and
|
228 |
|
|
-- the reason for the link is R. Ea_Id is the contents to be placed in the
|
229 |
|
|
-- Elab_All_Link of the entry.
|
230 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id);
|
232 |
|
|
-- Chosen is the next entry chosen in the elaboration order. This procedure
|
233 |
|
|
-- updates all data structures appropriately.
|
234 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
|
236 |
|
|
pragma Inline (Corresponding_Body);
|
237 |
|
|
-- Given a unit which is a spec for which there is a separate body, return
|
238 |
|
|
-- the unit id of the body. It is an error to call this routine with a unit
|
239 |
|
|
-- that is not a spec, or which does not have a separate body.
|
240 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
|
242 |
|
|
pragma Inline (Corresponding_Spec);
|
243 |
|
|
-- Given a unit which is a body for which there is a separate spec, return
|
244 |
|
|
-- the unit id of the spec. It is an error to call this routine with a unit
|
245 |
|
|
-- that is not a body, or which does not have a separate spec.
|
246 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
|
248 |
|
|
-- Called when no elaboration order can be found. Outputs an appropriate
|
249 |
|
|
-- diagnosis of the problem, and then abandons the bind.
|
250 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
procedure Elab_All_Links
|
252 |
|
|
(Before : Unit_Id;
|
253 |
|
|
After : Unit_Id;
|
254 |
|
|
Reason : Succ_Reason;
|
255 |
|
|
Link : Elab_All_Id);
|
256 |
|
|
-- Used to compute the transitive closure of elaboration links for an
|
257 |
|
|
-- Elaborate_All pragma (Reason = Elab_All) or for an indication of
|
258 |
|
|
-- Elaborate_All_Desirable (Reason = Elab_All_Desirable). Unit After has
|
259 |
|
|
-- a pragma Elaborate_All or the front end has determined that a reference
|
260 |
|
|
-- probably requires Elaborate_All is required, and unit Before must be
|
261 |
|
|
-- previously elaborated. First a link is built making sure that unit
|
262 |
|
|
-- Before is elaborated before After, then a recursive call ensures that
|
263 |
|
|
-- we also build links for any units needed by Before (i.e. these units
|
264 |
|
|
-- must/should also be elaborated before After). Link is used to build
|
265 |
|
|
-- a chain of Elab_All_Entries to explain the reason for a link. The
|
266 |
|
|
-- value passed is the chain so far.
|
267 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id);
|
269 |
|
|
-- Given a successor link, outputs an error message of the form
|
270 |
|
|
-- "$ must be elaborated before $ ..." where ... is the reason.
|
271 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
procedure Gather_Dependencies;
|
273 |
|
|
-- Compute dependencies, building the Succ and UNR tables
|
274 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
function Is_Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
|
276 |
|
|
pragma Inline (Is_Body_Unit);
|
277 |
|
|
-- Determines if given unit is a body
|
278 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
function Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
|
280 |
|
|
-- Returns True if corresponding unit is Pure or Preelaborate. Includes
|
281 |
|
|
-- dealing with testing flags on spec if it is given a body.
|
282 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
function Is_Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
|
284 |
|
|
pragma Inline (Is_Waiting_Body);
|
285 |
|
|
-- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
|
286 |
|
|
-- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
|
287 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
function Make_Elab_Entry
|
289 |
|
|
(Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
|
290 |
|
|
Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id;
|
291 |
|
|
-- Make an Elab_All_Entries table entry with the given Unam and Link
|
292 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
function Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
|
294 |
|
|
-- This is like Better_Choice, and has the same interface, but returns
|
295 |
|
|
-- true if U1 is a worse choice than U2 in the sense of the -p (pessimistic
|
296 |
|
|
-- elaboration order) switch. We still have to obey Ada rules, so it is
|
297 |
|
|
-- not quite the direct inverse of Better_Choice.
|
298 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id;
|
300 |
|
|
-- This function uses the Info field set in the names table to obtain
|
301 |
|
|
-- the unit Id of a unit, given its name id value.
|
302 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
procedure Write_Dependencies;
|
304 |
|
|
-- Write out dependencies (called only if appropriate option is set)
|
305 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id);
|
307 |
|
|
-- If the reason for the link S is Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable,
|
308 |
|
|
-- then this routine will output the "needed by" explanation chain.
|
309 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
-------------------
|
311 |
|
|
-- Better_Choice --
|
312 |
|
|
-------------------
|
313 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
|
315 |
|
|
UT1 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U1);
|
316 |
|
|
UT2 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U2);
|
317 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
begin
|
319 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
320 |
|
|
Write_Str ("Better_Choice (");
|
321 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (UT1.Uname);
|
322 |
|
|
Write_Str (", ");
|
323 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (UT2.Uname);
|
324 |
|
|
Write_Line (")");
|
325 |
|
|
end if;
|
326 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
-- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
|
328 |
|
|
-- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
|
329 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
-- Prefer a waiting body to one that is not a waiting body
|
331 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
if Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
|
333 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
334 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is waiting body, u2 is not");
|
335 |
|
|
end if;
|
336 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
return True;
|
338 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U2) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U1) then
|
340 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
341 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is waiting body, u1 is not");
|
342 |
|
|
end if;
|
343 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
return False;
|
345 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
-- Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
|
347 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
elsif UT1.Predefined and then not UT2.Predefined then
|
349 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
350 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is predefined, u2 is not");
|
351 |
|
|
end if;
|
352 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
return True;
|
354 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
elsif UT2.Predefined and then not UT1.Predefined then
|
356 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
357 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is predefined, u1 is not");
|
358 |
|
|
end if;
|
359 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
return False;
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
-- Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
|
363 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
elsif UT1.Internal and then not UT2.Internal then
|
365 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
366 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is internal, u2 is not");
|
367 |
|
|
end if;
|
368 |
|
|
return True;
|
369 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
elsif UT2.Internal and then not UT1.Internal then
|
371 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
372 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is internal, u1 is not");
|
373 |
|
|
end if;
|
374 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
return False;
|
376 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
-- Prefer a pure or preelaborable unit to one that is not
|
378 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
|
380 |
|
|
and then not
|
381 |
|
|
Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
|
382 |
|
|
then
|
383 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
384 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is pure/preelab, u2 is not");
|
385 |
|
|
end if;
|
386 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
return True;
|
388 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
|
390 |
|
|
and then not
|
391 |
|
|
Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
|
392 |
|
|
then
|
393 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
394 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is pure/preelab, u1 is not");
|
395 |
|
|
end if;
|
396 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
return False;
|
398 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
-- Prefer a body to a spec
|
400 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
elsif Is_Body_Unit (U1) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U2) then
|
402 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
403 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is body, u2 is not");
|
404 |
|
|
end if;
|
405 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
return True;
|
407 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
elsif Is_Body_Unit (U2) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U1) then
|
409 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
410 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is body, u1 is not");
|
411 |
|
|
end if;
|
412 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
return False;
|
414 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
-- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
|
416 |
|
|
-- more recently elaborated. Consider the following:
|
417 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
-- spec of A
|
419 |
|
|
-- spec of B
|
420 |
|
|
-- body of A or B?
|
421 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
-- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
|
423 |
|
|
-- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
|
424 |
|
|
-- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
|
425 |
|
|
-- to put the body of B first.
|
426 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
|
428 |
|
|
declare
|
429 |
|
|
Result : constant Boolean :=
|
430 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position >
|
431 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
|
432 |
|
|
begin
|
433 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
434 |
|
|
if Result then
|
435 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: based on waiting body elab positions");
|
436 |
|
|
else
|
437 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: based on waiting body elab positions");
|
438 |
|
|
end if;
|
439 |
|
|
end if;
|
440 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
return Result;
|
442 |
|
|
end;
|
443 |
|
|
end if;
|
444 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
-- Remaining choice rules are disabled by Debug flag -do
|
446 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
if not Debug_Flag_O then
|
448 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
-- The following deal with the case of specs which have been marked
|
450 |
|
|
-- as Elaborate_Body_Desirable. We generally want to delay these
|
451 |
|
|
-- specs as long as possible, so that the bodies have a better chance
|
452 |
|
|
-- of being elaborated closer to the specs.
|
453 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
-- If we have two units, one of which is a spec for which this flag
|
455 |
|
|
-- is set, and the other is not, we prefer to delay the spec for
|
456 |
|
|
-- which the flag is set.
|
457 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
if not UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
459 |
|
|
and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
460 |
|
|
then
|
461 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
462 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
|
463 |
|
|
end if;
|
464 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
return True;
|
466 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
elsif not UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
468 |
|
|
and then UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
469 |
|
|
then
|
470 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
471 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
|
472 |
|
|
end if;
|
473 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
return False;
|
475 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
-- If we have two specs that are both marked as Elaborate_Body
|
477 |
|
|
-- desirable, we prefer the one whose body is nearer to being able
|
478 |
|
|
-- to be elaborated, based on the Num_Pred count. This helps to
|
479 |
|
|
-- ensure bodies are as close to specs as possible.
|
480 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
elsif UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
482 |
|
|
and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
483 |
|
|
then
|
484 |
|
|
declare
|
485 |
|
|
Result : constant Boolean :=
|
486 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U1)).Num_Pred <
|
487 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U2)).Num_Pred;
|
488 |
|
|
begin
|
489 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
490 |
|
|
if Result then
|
491 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True based on Num_Pred compare");
|
492 |
|
|
else
|
493 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False based on Num_Pred compare");
|
494 |
|
|
end if;
|
495 |
|
|
end if;
|
496 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
return Result;
|
498 |
|
|
end;
|
499 |
|
|
end if;
|
500 |
|
|
end if;
|
501 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
-- If we fall through, it means that no preference rule applies, so we
|
503 |
|
|
-- use alphabetical order to at least give a deterministic result.
|
504 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
506 |
|
|
Write_Line (" choose on alpha order");
|
507 |
|
|
end if;
|
508 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
return Uname_Less (UT1.Uname, UT2.Uname);
|
510 |
|
|
end Better_Choice;
|
511 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
----------------
|
513 |
|
|
-- Build_Link --
|
514 |
|
|
----------------
|
515 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
procedure Build_Link
|
517 |
|
|
(Before : Unit_Id;
|
518 |
|
|
After : Unit_Id;
|
519 |
|
|
R : Succ_Reason;
|
520 |
|
|
Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link)
|
521 |
|
|
is
|
522 |
|
|
Cspec : Unit_Id;
|
523 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
begin
|
525 |
|
|
Succ.Increment_Last;
|
526 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Before := Before;
|
527 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Next := UNR.Table (Before).Successors;
|
528 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Before).Successors := Succ.Last;
|
529 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason := R;
|
530 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason_Unit := Cur_Unit;
|
531 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_All_Link := Ea_Id;
|
532 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
-- Deal with special Elab_Body case. If the After of this link is
|
534 |
|
|
-- a body whose spec has Elaborate_All set, and this is not the link
|
535 |
|
|
-- directly from the body to the spec, then we make the After of the
|
536 |
|
|
-- link reference its spec instead, marking the link appropriately.
|
537 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
if Units.Table (After).Utype = Is_Body then
|
539 |
|
|
Cspec := Corresponding_Spec (After);
|
540 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Cspec).Elaborate_Body
|
542 |
|
|
and then Cspec /= Before
|
543 |
|
|
then
|
544 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := Cspec;
|
545 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := True;
|
546 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred + 1;
|
547 |
|
|
return;
|
548 |
|
|
end if;
|
549 |
|
|
end if;
|
550 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
-- Fall through on normal case
|
552 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := After;
|
554 |
|
|
Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := False;
|
555 |
|
|
UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred + 1;
|
556 |
|
|
end Build_Link;
|
557 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
------------
|
559 |
|
|
-- Choose --
|
560 |
|
|
------------
|
561 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id) is
|
563 |
|
|
S : Successor_Id;
|
564 |
|
|
U : Unit_Id;
|
565 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
begin
|
567 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_C then
|
568 |
|
|
Write_Str ("Choosing Unit ");
|
569 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (Chosen).Uname);
|
570 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
571 |
|
|
end if;
|
572 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
-- Add to elaboration order. Note that units having no elaboration
|
574 |
|
|
-- code are not treated specially yet. The special casing of this
|
575 |
|
|
-- is in Bindgen, where Gen_Elab_Calls skips over them. Meanwhile
|
576 |
|
|
-- we need them here, because the object file list is also driven
|
577 |
|
|
-- by the contents of the Elab_Order table.
|
578 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
Elab_Order.Increment_Last;
|
580 |
|
|
Elab_Order.Table (Elab_Order.Last) := Chosen;
|
581 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
-- Remove from No_Pred list. This is a little inefficient and may
|
583 |
|
|
-- be we should doubly link the list, but it will do for now!
|
584 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
if No_Pred = Chosen then
|
586 |
|
|
No_Pred := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
|
587 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
else
|
589 |
|
|
-- Note that we just ignore the situation where it does not
|
590 |
|
|
-- appear in the No_Pred list, this happens in calls from the
|
591 |
|
|
-- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem routine, where cycles are being
|
592 |
|
|
-- removed arbitrarily from the graph.
|
593 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
U := No_Pred;
|
595 |
|
|
while U /= No_Unit_Id loop
|
596 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (U).Nextnp = Chosen then
|
597 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
|
598 |
|
|
exit;
|
599 |
|
|
end if;
|
600 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
|
602 |
|
|
end loop;
|
603 |
|
|
end if;
|
604 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
-- For all successors, decrement the number of predecessors, and
|
606 |
|
|
-- if it becomes zero, then add to no predecessor list.
|
607 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
S := UNR.Table (Chosen).Successors;
|
609 |
|
|
while S /= No_Successor loop
|
610 |
|
|
U := Succ.Table (S).After;
|
611 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred - 1;
|
612 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_N then
|
614 |
|
|
Write_Str (" decrementing Num_Pred for unit ");
|
615 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
|
616 |
|
|
Write_Str (" new value = ");
|
617 |
|
|
Write_Int (UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred);
|
618 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
619 |
|
|
end if;
|
620 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
|
622 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
|
623 |
|
|
No_Pred := U;
|
624 |
|
|
end if;
|
625 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
|
627 |
|
|
end loop;
|
628 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
-- All done, adjust number of units left count and set elaboration pos
|
630 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
Num_Left := Num_Left - 1;
|
632 |
|
|
Num_Chosen := Num_Chosen + 1;
|
633 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
|
634 |
|
|
Units.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
|
635 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
-- If we just chose a spec with Elaborate_Body set, then we
|
637 |
|
|
-- must immediately elaborate the body, before any other units.
|
638 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Chosen).Elaborate_Body then
|
640 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
-- If the unit is a spec only, then there is no body. This is a bit
|
642 |
|
|
-- odd given that Elaborate_Body is here, but it is valid in an
|
643 |
|
|
-- RCI unit, where we only have the interface in the stub bind.
|
644 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Chosen).Utype = Is_Spec_Only
|
646 |
|
|
and then Units.Table (Chosen).RCI
|
647 |
|
|
then
|
648 |
|
|
null;
|
649 |
|
|
else
|
650 |
|
|
Choose (Corresponding_Body (Chosen));
|
651 |
|
|
end if;
|
652 |
|
|
end if;
|
653 |
|
|
end Choose;
|
654 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
------------------------
|
656 |
|
|
-- Corresponding_Body --
|
657 |
|
|
------------------------
|
658 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
-- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
|
660 |
|
|
-- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
|
661 |
|
|
-- first and the spec appearing second.
|
662 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
|
664 |
|
|
begin
|
665 |
|
|
pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Spec);
|
666 |
|
|
return U - 1;
|
667 |
|
|
end Corresponding_Body;
|
668 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
------------------------
|
670 |
|
|
-- Corresponding_Spec --
|
671 |
|
|
------------------------
|
672 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
-- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
|
674 |
|
|
-- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
|
675 |
|
|
-- first and the spec appearing second.
|
676 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
|
678 |
|
|
begin
|
679 |
|
|
pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body);
|
680 |
|
|
return U + 1;
|
681 |
|
|
end Corresponding_Spec;
|
682 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
----------------------------------
|
684 |
|
|
-- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem --
|
685 |
|
|
----------------------------------
|
686 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem is
|
688 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean;
|
690 |
|
|
-- Recursive routine used to find a path from node Ufrom to node Uto.
|
691 |
|
|
-- If a path exists, returns True and outputs an appropriate set of
|
692 |
|
|
-- error messages giving the path. Also calls Choose for each of the
|
693 |
|
|
-- nodes so that they get removed from the remaining set. There are
|
694 |
|
|
-- two cases of calls, either Ufrom = Uto for an attempt to find a
|
695 |
|
|
-- cycle, or Ufrom is a spec and Uto the corresponding body for the
|
696 |
|
|
-- case of an unsatisfiable Elaborate_Body pragma. ML is the minimum
|
697 |
|
|
-- acceptable length for a path.
|
698 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
---------------
|
700 |
|
|
-- Find_Path --
|
701 |
|
|
---------------
|
702 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean is
|
704 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean;
|
706 |
|
|
-- This is the inner recursive routine, it determines if a path
|
707 |
|
|
-- exists from U to Uto, and if so returns True and outputs the
|
708 |
|
|
-- appropriate set of error messages. PL is the path length
|
709 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
---------------
|
711 |
|
|
-- Find_Link --
|
712 |
|
|
---------------
|
713 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean is
|
715 |
|
|
S : Successor_Id;
|
716 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
begin
|
718 |
|
|
-- Recursion ends if we are at terminating node and the path
|
719 |
|
|
-- is sufficiently long, generate error message and return True.
|
720 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
if U = Uto and then PL >= ML then
|
722 |
|
|
Choose (U);
|
723 |
|
|
return True;
|
724 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
-- All done if already visited, otherwise mark as visited
|
726 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
elsif UNR.Table (U).Visited then
|
728 |
|
|
return False;
|
729 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
-- Otherwise mark as visited and look at all successors
|
731 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
else
|
733 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Visited := True;
|
734 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
S := UNR.Table (U).Successors;
|
736 |
|
|
while S /= No_Successor loop
|
737 |
|
|
if Find_Link (Succ.Table (S).After, PL + 1) then
|
738 |
|
|
Elab_Error_Msg (S);
|
739 |
|
|
Choose (U);
|
740 |
|
|
return True;
|
741 |
|
|
end if;
|
742 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
|
744 |
|
|
end loop;
|
745 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
-- Falling through means this does not lead to a path
|
747 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
return False;
|
749 |
|
|
end if;
|
750 |
|
|
end Find_Link;
|
751 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
-- Start of processing for Find_Path
|
753 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
begin
|
755 |
|
|
-- Initialize all non-chosen nodes to not visisted yet
|
756 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
|
758 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Visited := UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position /= 0;
|
759 |
|
|
end loop;
|
760 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
-- Now try to find the path
|
762 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
return Find_Link (Ufrom, 0);
|
764 |
|
|
end Find_Path;
|
765 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
-- Start of processing for Diagnose_Elaboration_Error
|
767 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
begin
|
769 |
|
|
Set_Standard_Error;
|
770 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
-- Output state of things if debug flag N set
|
772 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_N then
|
774 |
|
|
declare
|
775 |
|
|
NP : Int;
|
776 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
begin
|
778 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
779 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
780 |
|
|
Write_Str ("Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem called");
|
781 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
782 |
|
|
Write_Str ("List of remaining unchosen units and predecessors");
|
783 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
784 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
|
786 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
|
787 |
|
|
NP := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred;
|
788 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
789 |
|
|
Write_Str (" Unchosen unit: #");
|
790 |
|
|
Write_Int (Int (U));
|
791 |
|
|
Write_Str (" ");
|
792 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
|
793 |
|
|
Write_Str (" (Num_Pred = ");
|
794 |
|
|
Write_Int (NP);
|
795 |
|
|
Write_Char (')');
|
796 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
797 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
if NP = 0 then
|
799 |
|
|
if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
|
800 |
|
|
Write_Str
|
801 |
|
|
(" (not chosen because of Elaborate_Body)");
|
802 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
803 |
|
|
else
|
804 |
|
|
Write_Str (" ****************** why not chosen?");
|
805 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
806 |
|
|
end if;
|
807 |
|
|
end if;
|
808 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
-- Search links list to find unchosen predecessors
|
810 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
for S in Succ.First .. Succ.Last loop
|
812 |
|
|
declare
|
813 |
|
|
SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
|
814 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
begin
|
816 |
|
|
if SL.After = U
|
817 |
|
|
and then UNR.Table (SL.Before).Elab_Position = 0
|
818 |
|
|
then
|
819 |
|
|
Write_Str (" unchosen predecessor: #");
|
820 |
|
|
Write_Int (Int (SL.Before));
|
821 |
|
|
Write_Str (" ");
|
822 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname);
|
823 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
824 |
|
|
NP := NP - 1;
|
825 |
|
|
end if;
|
826 |
|
|
end;
|
827 |
|
|
end loop;
|
828 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
if NP /= 0 then
|
830 |
|
|
Write_Str (" **************** Num_Pred value wrong!");
|
831 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
832 |
|
|
end if;
|
833 |
|
|
end if;
|
834 |
|
|
end loop;
|
835 |
|
|
end;
|
836 |
|
|
end if;
|
837 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
-- Output the header for the error, and manually increment the
|
839 |
|
|
-- error count. We are using Error_Msg_Output rather than Error_Msg
|
840 |
|
|
-- here for two reasons:
|
841 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
-- This is really only one error, not one for each line
|
843 |
|
|
-- We want this output on standard output since it is voluminous
|
844 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
-- But we do need to deal with the error count manually in this case
|
846 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
Errors_Detected := Errors_Detected + 1;
|
848 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output ("elaboration circularity detected", Info => False);
|
849 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
-- Try to find cycles starting with any of the remaining nodes that have
|
851 |
|
|
-- not yet been chosen. There must be at least one (there is some reason
|
852 |
|
|
-- we are being called!)
|
853 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
|
855 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
|
856 |
|
|
if Find_Path (U, U, 1) then
|
857 |
|
|
raise Unrecoverable_Error;
|
858 |
|
|
end if;
|
859 |
|
|
end if;
|
860 |
|
|
end loop;
|
861 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
-- We should never get here, since we were called for some reason,
|
863 |
|
|
-- and we should have found and eliminated at least one bad path.
|
864 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
866 |
|
|
end Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
|
867 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
--------------------
|
869 |
|
|
-- Elab_All_Links --
|
870 |
|
|
--------------------
|
871 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
procedure Elab_All_Links
|
873 |
|
|
(Before : Unit_Id;
|
874 |
|
|
After : Unit_Id;
|
875 |
|
|
Reason : Succ_Reason;
|
876 |
|
|
Link : Elab_All_Id)
|
877 |
|
|
is
|
878 |
|
|
begin
|
879 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (Before).Visited then
|
880 |
|
|
return;
|
881 |
|
|
end if;
|
882 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
-- Build the direct link for Before
|
884 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Before).Visited := True;
|
886 |
|
|
Build_Link (Before, After, Reason, Link);
|
887 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
-- Process all units with'ed by Before recursively
|
889 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
for W in
|
891 |
|
|
Units.Table (Before).First_With .. Units.Table (Before).Last_With
|
892 |
|
|
loop
|
893 |
|
|
-- Skip if this with is an interface to a stand-alone library.
|
894 |
|
|
-- Skip also if no ALI file for this WITH, happens for language
|
895 |
|
|
-- defined generics while bootstrapping the compiler (see body of
|
896 |
|
|
-- Lib.Writ.Write_With_Lines). Finally, skip if it is a limited
|
897 |
|
|
-- with clause, which does not impose an elaboration link.
|
898 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
if not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface
|
900 |
|
|
and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
|
901 |
|
|
and then not Withs.Table (W).Limited_With
|
902 |
|
|
then
|
903 |
|
|
declare
|
904 |
|
|
Info : constant Int :=
|
905 |
|
|
Get_Name_Table_Info
|
906 |
|
|
(Withs.Table (W).Uname);
|
907 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
begin
|
909 |
|
|
-- If the unit is unknown, for some unknown reason, fail
|
910 |
|
|
-- graciously explaining that the unit is unknown. Without
|
911 |
|
|
-- this check, gnatbind will crash in Unit_Id_Of.
|
912 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
if Info = 0 or else Unit_Id (Info) = No_Unit_Id then
|
914 |
|
|
declare
|
915 |
|
|
Withed : String :=
|
916 |
|
|
Get_Name_String (Withs.Table (W).Uname);
|
917 |
|
|
Last_Withed : Natural := Withed'Last;
|
918 |
|
|
Withing : String :=
|
919 |
|
|
Get_Name_String
|
920 |
|
|
(Units.Table (Before).Uname);
|
921 |
|
|
Last_Withing : Natural := Withing'Last;
|
922 |
|
|
Spec_Body : String := " (Spec)";
|
923 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
begin
|
925 |
|
|
To_Mixed (Withed);
|
926 |
|
|
To_Mixed (Withing);
|
927 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
if Last_Withed > 2 and then
|
929 |
|
|
Withed (Last_Withed - 1) = '%'
|
930 |
|
|
then
|
931 |
|
|
Last_Withed := Last_Withed - 2;
|
932 |
|
|
end if;
|
933 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
if Last_Withing > 2 and then
|
935 |
|
|
Withing (Last_Withing - 1) = '%'
|
936 |
|
|
then
|
937 |
|
|
Last_Withing := Last_Withing - 2;
|
938 |
|
|
end if;
|
939 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Body or else
|
941 |
|
|
Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Body_Only
|
942 |
|
|
then
|
943 |
|
|
Spec_Body := " (Body)";
|
944 |
|
|
end if;
|
945 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
Osint.Fail
|
947 |
|
|
("could not find unit "
|
948 |
|
|
& Withed (Withed'First .. Last_Withed) & " needed by "
|
949 |
|
|
& Withing (Withing'First .. Last_Withing) & Spec_Body);
|
950 |
|
|
end;
|
951 |
|
|
end if;
|
952 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
Elab_All_Links
|
954 |
|
|
(Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname),
|
955 |
|
|
After,
|
956 |
|
|
Reason,
|
957 |
|
|
Make_Elab_Entry (Withs.Table (W).Uname, Link));
|
958 |
|
|
end;
|
959 |
|
|
end if;
|
960 |
|
|
end loop;
|
961 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
-- Process corresponding body, if there is one
|
963 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Spec then
|
965 |
|
|
Elab_All_Links
|
966 |
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Before),
|
967 |
|
|
After, Reason,
|
968 |
|
|
Make_Elab_Entry
|
969 |
|
|
(Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (Before)).Uname, Link));
|
970 |
|
|
end if;
|
971 |
|
|
end Elab_All_Links;
|
972 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
--------------------
|
974 |
|
|
-- Elab_Error_Msg --
|
975 |
|
|
--------------------
|
976 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id) is
|
978 |
|
|
SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
|
979 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
begin
|
981 |
|
|
-- Nothing to do if internal unit involved and no -da flag
|
982 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
if not Debug_Flag_A
|
984 |
|
|
and then
|
985 |
|
|
(Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Sfile)
|
986 |
|
|
or else
|
987 |
|
|
Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.After).Sfile))
|
988 |
|
|
then
|
989 |
|
|
return;
|
990 |
|
|
end if;
|
991 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
-- Here we want to generate output
|
993 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
|
995 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
if SL.Elab_Body then
|
997 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (SL.After)).Uname;
|
998 |
|
|
else
|
999 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
|
1000 |
|
|
end if;
|
1001 |
|
|
|
1002 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output (" $ must be elaborated before $", Info => True);
|
1003 |
|
|
|
1004 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Reason_Unit).Uname;
|
1005 |
|
|
|
1006 |
|
|
case SL.Reason is
|
1007 |
|
|
when Withed =>
|
1008 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1009 |
|
|
(" reason: with clause",
|
1010 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1011 |
|
|
|
1012 |
|
|
when Elab =>
|
1013 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1014 |
|
|
(" reason: pragma Elaborate in unit $",
|
1015 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1016 |
|
|
|
1017 |
|
|
when Elab_All =>
|
1018 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1019 |
|
|
(" reason: pragma Elaborate_All in unit $",
|
1020 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1021 |
|
|
|
1022 |
|
|
when Elab_All_Desirable =>
|
1023 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1024 |
|
|
(" reason: implicit Elaborate_All in unit $",
|
1025 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1026 |
|
|
|
1027 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1028 |
|
|
(" recompile $ with -gnatwl for full details",
|
1029 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1030 |
|
|
|
1031 |
|
|
when Elab_Desirable =>
|
1032 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1033 |
|
|
(" reason: implicit Elaborate in unit $",
|
1034 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1035 |
|
|
|
1036 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1037 |
|
|
(" recompile $ with -gnatwl for full details",
|
1038 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1039 |
|
|
|
1040 |
|
|
when Spec_First =>
|
1041 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1042 |
|
|
(" reason: spec always elaborated before body",
|
1043 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1044 |
|
|
end case;
|
1045 |
|
|
|
1046 |
|
|
Write_Elab_All_Chain (S);
|
1047 |
|
|
|
1048 |
|
|
if SL.Elab_Body then
|
1049 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
|
1050 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
|
1051 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1052 |
|
|
(" $ must therefore be elaborated before $",
|
1053 |
|
|
True);
|
1054 |
|
|
|
1055 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
|
1056 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1057 |
|
|
(" (because $ has a pragma Elaborate_Body)",
|
1058 |
|
|
True);
|
1059 |
|
|
end if;
|
1060 |
|
|
|
1061 |
|
|
if not Zero_Formatting then
|
1062 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1063 |
|
|
end if;
|
1064 |
|
|
end Elab_Error_Msg;
|
1065 |
|
|
|
1066 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1067 |
|
|
-- Find_Elab_Order --
|
1068 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1069 |
|
|
|
1070 |
|
|
procedure Find_Elab_Order is
|
1071 |
|
|
U : Unit_Id;
|
1072 |
|
|
Best_So_Far : Unit_Id;
|
1073 |
|
|
|
1074 |
|
|
begin
|
1075 |
|
|
Succ.Init;
|
1076 |
|
|
Num_Left := Int (Units.Last - Units.First + 1);
|
1077 |
|
|
|
1078 |
|
|
-- Initialize unit table for elaboration control
|
1079 |
|
|
|
1080 |
|
|
for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
|
1081 |
|
|
UNR.Increment_Last;
|
1082 |
|
|
UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Successors := No_Successor;
|
1083 |
|
|
UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Num_Pred := 0;
|
1084 |
|
|
UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Nextnp := No_Unit_Id;
|
1085 |
|
|
UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Order := 0;
|
1086 |
|
|
UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Position := 0;
|
1087 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1088 |
|
|
|
1089 |
|
|
-- Output warning if -p used with no -gnatE units
|
1090 |
|
|
|
1091 |
|
|
if Pessimistic_Elab_Order
|
1092 |
|
|
and not Dynamic_Elaboration_Checks_Specified
|
1093 |
|
|
then
|
1094 |
|
|
if OpenVMS_On_Target then
|
1095 |
|
|
Error_Msg ("?use of /PESSIMISTIC_ELABORATION questionable");
|
1096 |
|
|
else
|
1097 |
|
|
Error_Msg ("?use of -p switch questionable");
|
1098 |
|
|
end if;
|
1099 |
|
|
|
1100 |
|
|
Error_Msg ("?since all units compiled with static elaboration model");
|
1101 |
|
|
end if;
|
1102 |
|
|
|
1103 |
|
|
-- Gather dependencies and output them if option set
|
1104 |
|
|
|
1105 |
|
|
Gather_Dependencies;
|
1106 |
|
|
|
1107 |
|
|
-- Output elaboration dependencies if option is set
|
1108 |
|
|
|
1109 |
|
|
if Elab_Dependency_Output or Debug_Flag_E then
|
1110 |
|
|
Write_Dependencies;
|
1111 |
|
|
end if;
|
1112 |
|
|
|
1113 |
|
|
-- Initialize the no predecessor list
|
1114 |
|
|
|
1115 |
|
|
No_Pred := No_Unit_Id;
|
1116 |
|
|
|
1117 |
|
|
for U in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
|
1118 |
|
|
if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
|
1119 |
|
|
UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
|
1120 |
|
|
No_Pred := U;
|
1121 |
|
|
end if;
|
1122 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1123 |
|
|
|
1124 |
|
|
-- OK, now we determine the elaboration order proper. All we do is to
|
1125 |
|
|
-- select the best choice from the no predecessor list until all the
|
1126 |
|
|
-- nodes have been chosen.
|
1127 |
|
|
|
1128 |
|
|
Outer : loop
|
1129 |
|
|
|
1130 |
|
|
-- If there are no nodes with predecessors, then either we are
|
1131 |
|
|
-- done, as indicated by Num_Left being set to zero, or we have
|
1132 |
|
|
-- a circularity. In the latter case, diagnose the circularity,
|
1133 |
|
|
-- removing it from the graph and continue
|
1134 |
|
|
|
1135 |
|
|
Get_No_Pred : while No_Pred = No_Unit_Id loop
|
1136 |
|
|
exit Outer when Num_Left < 1;
|
1137 |
|
|
Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
|
1138 |
|
|
end loop Get_No_Pred;
|
1139 |
|
|
|
1140 |
|
|
U := No_Pred;
|
1141 |
|
|
Best_So_Far := No_Unit_Id;
|
1142 |
|
|
|
1143 |
|
|
-- Loop to choose best entry in No_Pred list
|
1144 |
|
|
|
1145 |
|
|
No_Pred_Search : loop
|
1146 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_N then
|
1147 |
|
|
Write_Str (" considering choice of ");
|
1148 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
|
1149 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1150 |
|
|
|
1151 |
|
|
if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
|
1152 |
|
|
Write_Str
|
1153 |
|
|
(" Elaborate_Body = True, Num_Pred for body = ");
|
1154 |
|
|
Write_Int
|
1155 |
|
|
(UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U)).Num_Pred);
|
1156 |
|
|
else
|
1157 |
|
|
Write_Str
|
1158 |
|
|
(" Elaborate_Body = False");
|
1159 |
|
|
end if;
|
1160 |
|
|
|
1161 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1162 |
|
|
end if;
|
1163 |
|
|
|
1164 |
|
|
-- This is a candididate to be considered for choice
|
1165 |
|
|
|
1166 |
|
|
if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id
|
1167 |
|
|
or else ((not Pessimistic_Elab_Order)
|
1168 |
|
|
and then Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
|
1169 |
|
|
or else (Pessimistic_Elab_Order
|
1170 |
|
|
and then Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
|
1171 |
|
|
then
|
1172 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_N then
|
1173 |
|
|
Write_Str (" tentatively chosen (best so far)");
|
1174 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1175 |
|
|
end if;
|
1176 |
|
|
|
1177 |
|
|
Best_So_Far := U;
|
1178 |
|
|
end if;
|
1179 |
|
|
|
1180 |
|
|
U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
|
1181 |
|
|
exit No_Pred_Search when U = No_Unit_Id;
|
1182 |
|
|
end loop No_Pred_Search;
|
1183 |
|
|
|
1184 |
|
|
-- If no candididate chosen, it means that no unit has No_Pred = 0,
|
1185 |
|
|
-- but there are units left, hence we have a circular dependency,
|
1186 |
|
|
-- which we will get Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem to diagnose it.
|
1187 |
|
|
|
1188 |
|
|
if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id then
|
1189 |
|
|
Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
|
1190 |
|
|
|
1191 |
|
|
-- Otherwise choose the best candidate found
|
1192 |
|
|
|
1193 |
|
|
else
|
1194 |
|
|
Choose (Best_So_Far);
|
1195 |
|
|
end if;
|
1196 |
|
|
end loop Outer;
|
1197 |
|
|
end Find_Elab_Order;
|
1198 |
|
|
|
1199 |
|
|
-------------------------
|
1200 |
|
|
-- Gather_Dependencies --
|
1201 |
|
|
-------------------------
|
1202 |
|
|
|
1203 |
|
|
procedure Gather_Dependencies is
|
1204 |
|
|
Withed_Unit : Unit_Id;
|
1205 |
|
|
|
1206 |
|
|
begin
|
1207 |
|
|
-- Loop through all units
|
1208 |
|
|
|
1209 |
|
|
for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
|
1210 |
|
|
Cur_Unit := U;
|
1211 |
|
|
|
1212 |
|
|
-- If this is not an interface to a stand-alone library and
|
1213 |
|
|
-- there is a body and a spec, then spec must be elaborated first
|
1214 |
|
|
-- Note that the corresponding spec immediately follows the body
|
1215 |
|
|
|
1216 |
|
|
if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface
|
1217 |
|
|
and then Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
|
1218 |
|
|
then
|
1219 |
|
|
Build_Link (Corresponding_Spec (U), U, Spec_First);
|
1220 |
|
|
end if;
|
1221 |
|
|
|
1222 |
|
|
-- If this unit is not an interface to a stand-alone library,
|
1223 |
|
|
-- process WITH references for this unit ignoring generic units and
|
1224 |
|
|
-- interfaces to stand-alone libraries.
|
1225 |
|
|
|
1226 |
|
|
if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface then
|
1227 |
|
|
for
|
1228 |
|
|
W in Units.Table (U).First_With .. Units.Table (U).Last_With
|
1229 |
|
|
loop
|
1230 |
|
|
if Withs.Table (W).Sfile /= No_File
|
1231 |
|
|
and then (not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface)
|
1232 |
|
|
then
|
1233 |
|
|
-- Check for special case of withing a unit that does not
|
1234 |
|
|
-- exist any more. If the unit was completely missing we
|
1235 |
|
|
-- would already have detected this, but a nasty case arises
|
1236 |
|
|
-- when we have a subprogram body with no spec, and some
|
1237 |
|
|
-- obsolete unit with's a previous (now disappeared) spec.
|
1238 |
|
|
|
1239 |
|
|
if Get_Name_Table_Info (Withs.Table (W).Uname) = 0 then
|
1240 |
|
|
Error_Msg_File_1 := Units.Table (U).Sfile;
|
1241 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Withs.Table (W).Uname;
|
1242 |
|
|
Error_Msg ("{ depends on $ which no longer exists");
|
1243 |
|
|
goto Next_With;
|
1244 |
|
|
end if;
|
1245 |
|
|
|
1246 |
|
|
Withed_Unit := Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname);
|
1247 |
|
|
|
1248 |
|
|
-- Pragma Elaborate_All case, for this we use the recursive
|
1249 |
|
|
-- Elab_All_Links procedure to establish the links.
|
1250 |
|
|
|
1251 |
|
|
if Withs.Table (W).Elaborate_All then
|
1252 |
|
|
|
1253 |
|
|
-- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
|
1254 |
|
|
-- node.
|
1255 |
|
|
|
1256 |
|
|
for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
|
1257 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
|
1258 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1259 |
|
|
|
1260 |
|
|
-- Now establish all the links we need
|
1261 |
|
|
|
1262 |
|
|
Elab_All_Links
|
1263 |
|
|
(Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All,
|
1264 |
|
|
Make_Elab_Entry
|
1265 |
|
|
(Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
|
1266 |
|
|
|
1267 |
|
|
-- Elaborate_All_Desirable case, for this we establish the
|
1268 |
|
|
-- same links as above, but with a different reason.
|
1269 |
|
|
|
1270 |
|
|
elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_All_Desirable then
|
1271 |
|
|
|
1272 |
|
|
-- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
|
1273 |
|
|
-- node.
|
1274 |
|
|
|
1275 |
|
|
for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
|
1276 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
|
1277 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1278 |
|
|
|
1279 |
|
|
-- Now establish all the links we need
|
1280 |
|
|
|
1281 |
|
|
Elab_All_Links
|
1282 |
|
|
(Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All_Desirable,
|
1283 |
|
|
Make_Elab_Entry
|
1284 |
|
|
(Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
|
1285 |
|
|
|
1286 |
|
|
-- Pragma Elaborate case. We must build a link for the
|
1287 |
|
|
-- withed unit itself, and also the corresponding body if
|
1288 |
|
|
-- there is one.
|
1289 |
|
|
|
1290 |
|
|
-- However, skip this processing if there is no ALI file for
|
1291 |
|
|
-- the WITH entry, because this means it is a generic (even
|
1292 |
|
|
-- when we fix the generics so that an ALI file is present,
|
1293 |
|
|
-- we probably still will have no ALI file for unchecked and
|
1294 |
|
|
-- other special cases).
|
1295 |
|
|
|
1296 |
|
|
elsif Withs.Table (W).Elaborate
|
1297 |
|
|
and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
|
1298 |
|
|
then
|
1299 |
|
|
Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
|
1300 |
|
|
|
1301 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
|
1302 |
|
|
Build_Link
|
1303 |
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit), U, Elab);
|
1304 |
|
|
end if;
|
1305 |
|
|
|
1306 |
|
|
-- Elaborate_Desirable case, for this we establish
|
1307 |
|
|
-- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
|
1308 |
|
|
|
1309 |
|
|
elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_Desirable then
|
1310 |
|
|
Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
|
1311 |
|
|
|
1312 |
|
|
if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
|
1313 |
|
|
Build_Link
|
1314 |
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit),
|
1315 |
|
|
U, Elab_Desirable);
|
1316 |
|
|
end if;
|
1317 |
|
|
|
1318 |
|
|
-- A limited_with does not establish an elaboration
|
1319 |
|
|
-- dependence (that's the whole point!).
|
1320 |
|
|
|
1321 |
|
|
elsif Withs.Table (W).Limited_With then
|
1322 |
|
|
null;
|
1323 |
|
|
|
1324 |
|
|
-- Case of normal WITH with no elaboration pragmas, just
|
1325 |
|
|
-- build the single link to the directly referenced unit
|
1326 |
|
|
|
1327 |
|
|
else
|
1328 |
|
|
Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
|
1329 |
|
|
end if;
|
1330 |
|
|
end if;
|
1331 |
|
|
|
1332 |
|
|
<<Next_With>>
|
1333 |
|
|
null;
|
1334 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1335 |
|
|
end if;
|
1336 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1337 |
|
|
end Gather_Dependencies;
|
1338 |
|
|
|
1339 |
|
|
------------------
|
1340 |
|
|
-- Is_Body_Unit --
|
1341 |
|
|
------------------
|
1342 |
|
|
|
1343 |
|
|
function Is_Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
|
1344 |
|
|
begin
|
1345 |
|
|
return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
|
1346 |
|
|
or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
|
1347 |
|
|
end Is_Body_Unit;
|
1348 |
|
|
|
1349 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
1350 |
|
|
-- Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit --
|
1351 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
1352 |
|
|
|
1353 |
|
|
function Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
|
1354 |
|
|
begin
|
1355 |
|
|
-- If we have a body with separate spec, test flags on the spec
|
1356 |
|
|
|
1357 |
|
|
if Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body then
|
1358 |
|
|
return Units.Table (U + 1).Preelab
|
1359 |
|
|
or else
|
1360 |
|
|
Units.Table (U + 1).Pure;
|
1361 |
|
|
|
1362 |
|
|
-- Otherwise we have a spec or body acting as spec, test flags on unit
|
1363 |
|
|
|
1364 |
|
|
else
|
1365 |
|
|
return Units.Table (U).Preelab
|
1366 |
|
|
or else
|
1367 |
|
|
Units.Table (U).Pure;
|
1368 |
|
|
end if;
|
1369 |
|
|
end Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit;
|
1370 |
|
|
|
1371 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1372 |
|
|
-- Is_Waiting_Body --
|
1373 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1374 |
|
|
|
1375 |
|
|
function Is_Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
|
1376 |
|
|
begin
|
1377 |
|
|
return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
|
1378 |
|
|
and then UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
|
1379 |
|
|
end Is_Waiting_Body;
|
1380 |
|
|
|
1381 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1382 |
|
|
-- Make_Elab_Entry --
|
1383 |
|
|
---------------------
|
1384 |
|
|
|
1385 |
|
|
function Make_Elab_Entry
|
1386 |
|
|
(Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
|
1387 |
|
|
Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id
|
1388 |
|
|
is
|
1389 |
|
|
begin
|
1390 |
|
|
Elab_All_Entries.Increment_Last;
|
1391 |
|
|
Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Needed_By := Unam;
|
1392 |
|
|
Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Next_Elab := Link;
|
1393 |
|
|
return Elab_All_Entries.Last;
|
1394 |
|
|
end Make_Elab_Entry;
|
1395 |
|
|
|
1396 |
|
|
-------------------------------
|
1397 |
|
|
-- Pessimistic_Better_Choice --
|
1398 |
|
|
-------------------------------
|
1399 |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
function Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
|
1401 |
|
|
UT1 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U1);
|
1402 |
|
|
UT2 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U2);
|
1403 |
|
|
|
1404 |
|
|
begin
|
1405 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1406 |
|
|
Write_Str ("Pessimistic_Better_Choice (");
|
1407 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (UT1.Uname);
|
1408 |
|
|
Write_Str (", ");
|
1409 |
|
|
Write_Unit_Name (UT2.Uname);
|
1410 |
|
|
Write_Line (")");
|
1411 |
|
|
end if;
|
1412 |
|
|
|
1413 |
|
|
-- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
|
1414 |
|
|
-- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
|
1415 |
|
|
|
1416 |
|
|
-- If either unit is predefined or internal, then we use the normal
|
1417 |
|
|
-- Better_Choice rule, since we don't want to disturb the elaboration
|
1418 |
|
|
-- rules of the language with -p, same treatment for Pure/Preelab.
|
1419 |
|
|
|
1420 |
|
|
-- Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
|
1421 |
|
|
|
1422 |
|
|
if UT1.Predefined and then not UT2.Predefined then
|
1423 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1424 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is predefined, u2 is not");
|
1425 |
|
|
end if;
|
1426 |
|
|
|
1427 |
|
|
return True;
|
1428 |
|
|
|
1429 |
|
|
elsif UT2.Predefined and then not UT1.Predefined then
|
1430 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1431 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is predefined, u1 is not");
|
1432 |
|
|
end if;
|
1433 |
|
|
|
1434 |
|
|
return False;
|
1435 |
|
|
|
1436 |
|
|
-- Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
|
1437 |
|
|
|
1438 |
|
|
elsif UT1.Internal and then not UT2.Internal then
|
1439 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1440 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is internal, u2 is not");
|
1441 |
|
|
end if;
|
1442 |
|
|
|
1443 |
|
|
return True;
|
1444 |
|
|
|
1445 |
|
|
elsif UT2.Internal and then not UT1.Internal then
|
1446 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1447 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is internal, u1 is not");
|
1448 |
|
|
end if;
|
1449 |
|
|
|
1450 |
|
|
return False;
|
1451 |
|
|
|
1452 |
|
|
-- Prefer a pure or preelaborable unit to one that is not
|
1453 |
|
|
|
1454 |
|
|
elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
|
1455 |
|
|
and then not
|
1456 |
|
|
Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
|
1457 |
|
|
then
|
1458 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1459 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is pure/preelab, u2 is not");
|
1460 |
|
|
end if;
|
1461 |
|
|
|
1462 |
|
|
return True;
|
1463 |
|
|
|
1464 |
|
|
elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
|
1465 |
|
|
and then not
|
1466 |
|
|
Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
|
1467 |
|
|
then
|
1468 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1469 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u2 is pure/preelab, u1 is not");
|
1470 |
|
|
end if;
|
1471 |
|
|
|
1472 |
|
|
return False;
|
1473 |
|
|
|
1474 |
|
|
-- Prefer anything else to a waiting body. We want to make bodies wait
|
1475 |
|
|
-- as long as possible, till we are forced to choose them!
|
1476 |
|
|
|
1477 |
|
|
elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
|
1478 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1479 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u1 is waiting body, u2 is not");
|
1480 |
|
|
end if;
|
1481 |
|
|
|
1482 |
|
|
return False;
|
1483 |
|
|
|
1484 |
|
|
elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U2) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U1) then
|
1485 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1486 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u2 is waiting body, u1 is not");
|
1487 |
|
|
end if;
|
1488 |
|
|
|
1489 |
|
|
return True;
|
1490 |
|
|
|
1491 |
|
|
-- Prefer a spec to a body (!)
|
1492 |
|
|
|
1493 |
|
|
elsif Is_Body_Unit (U1) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U2) then
|
1494 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1495 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u1 is body, u2 is not");
|
1496 |
|
|
end if;
|
1497 |
|
|
|
1498 |
|
|
return False;
|
1499 |
|
|
|
1500 |
|
|
elsif Is_Body_Unit (U2) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U1) then
|
1501 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1502 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u2 is body, u1 is not");
|
1503 |
|
|
end if;
|
1504 |
|
|
|
1505 |
|
|
return True;
|
1506 |
|
|
|
1507 |
|
|
-- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
|
1508 |
|
|
-- less recently elaborated. Consider the following:
|
1509 |
|
|
|
1510 |
|
|
-- spec of A
|
1511 |
|
|
-- spec of B
|
1512 |
|
|
-- body of A or B?
|
1513 |
|
|
|
1514 |
|
|
-- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
|
1515 |
|
|
-- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
|
1516 |
|
|
-- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
|
1517 |
|
|
-- to put the body of B last so that if there is an elaboration order
|
1518 |
|
|
-- problem, we will find it (that's what pessimistic order is about)
|
1519 |
|
|
|
1520 |
|
|
elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
|
1521 |
|
|
declare
|
1522 |
|
|
Result : constant Boolean :=
|
1523 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position <
|
1524 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
|
1525 |
|
|
begin
|
1526 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1527 |
|
|
if Result then
|
1528 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: based on waiting body elab positions");
|
1529 |
|
|
else
|
1530 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: based on waiting body elab positions");
|
1531 |
|
|
end if;
|
1532 |
|
|
end if;
|
1533 |
|
|
|
1534 |
|
|
return Result;
|
1535 |
|
|
end;
|
1536 |
|
|
end if;
|
1537 |
|
|
|
1538 |
|
|
-- Remaining choice rules are disabled by Debug flag -do
|
1539 |
|
|
|
1540 |
|
|
if not Debug_Flag_O then
|
1541 |
|
|
|
1542 |
|
|
-- The following deal with the case of specs which have been marked
|
1543 |
|
|
-- as Elaborate_Body_Desirable. In the normal case, we generally want
|
1544 |
|
|
-- to delay the elaboration of these specs as long as possible, so
|
1545 |
|
|
-- that bodies have better chance of being elaborated closer to the
|
1546 |
|
|
-- specs. Pessimistic_Better_Choice as usual wants to do the opposite
|
1547 |
|
|
-- and elaborate such specs as early as possible.
|
1548 |
|
|
|
1549 |
|
|
-- If we have two units, one of which is a spec for which this flag
|
1550 |
|
|
-- is set, and the other is not, we normally prefer to delay the spec
|
1551 |
|
|
-- for which the flag is set, so again Pessimistic_Better_Choice does
|
1552 |
|
|
-- the opposite.
|
1553 |
|
|
|
1554 |
|
|
if not UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1555 |
|
|
and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1556 |
|
|
then
|
1557 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1558 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
|
1559 |
|
|
end if;
|
1560 |
|
|
|
1561 |
|
|
return False;
|
1562 |
|
|
|
1563 |
|
|
elsif not UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1564 |
|
|
and then UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1565 |
|
|
then
|
1566 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1567 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
|
1568 |
|
|
end if;
|
1569 |
|
|
|
1570 |
|
|
return True;
|
1571 |
|
|
|
1572 |
|
|
-- If we have two specs that are both marked as Elaborate_Body
|
1573 |
|
|
-- desirable, we normally prefer the one whose body is nearer to
|
1574 |
|
|
-- being able to be elaborated, based on the Num_Pred count. This
|
1575 |
|
|
-- helps to ensure bodies are as close to specs as possible. As
|
1576 |
|
|
-- usual, Pessimistic_Better_Choice does the opposite.
|
1577 |
|
|
|
1578 |
|
|
elsif UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1579 |
|
|
and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
|
1580 |
|
|
then
|
1581 |
|
|
declare
|
1582 |
|
|
Result : constant Boolean :=
|
1583 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U1)).Num_Pred >=
|
1584 |
|
|
UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U2)).Num_Pred;
|
1585 |
|
|
begin
|
1586 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1587 |
|
|
if Result then
|
1588 |
|
|
Write_Line (" True based on Num_Pred compare");
|
1589 |
|
|
else
|
1590 |
|
|
Write_Line (" False based on Num_Pred compare");
|
1591 |
|
|
end if;
|
1592 |
|
|
end if;
|
1593 |
|
|
|
1594 |
|
|
return Result;
|
1595 |
|
|
end;
|
1596 |
|
|
end if;
|
1597 |
|
|
end if;
|
1598 |
|
|
|
1599 |
|
|
-- If we fall through, it means that no preference rule applies, so we
|
1600 |
|
|
-- use alphabetical order to at least give a deterministic result. Since
|
1601 |
|
|
-- Pessimistic_Better_Choice is in the business of stirring up the
|
1602 |
|
|
-- order, we will use reverse alphabetical ordering.
|
1603 |
|
|
|
1604 |
|
|
if Debug_Flag_B then
|
1605 |
|
|
Write_Line (" choose on reverse alpha order");
|
1606 |
|
|
end if;
|
1607 |
|
|
|
1608 |
|
|
return Uname_Less (UT2.Uname, UT1.Uname);
|
1609 |
|
|
end Pessimistic_Better_Choice;
|
1610 |
|
|
|
1611 |
|
|
----------------
|
1612 |
|
|
-- Unit_Id_Of --
|
1613 |
|
|
----------------
|
1614 |
|
|
|
1615 |
|
|
function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id is
|
1616 |
|
|
Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Uname);
|
1617 |
|
|
begin
|
1618 |
|
|
pragma Assert (Info /= 0 and then Unit_Id (Info) /= No_Unit_Id);
|
1619 |
|
|
return Unit_Id (Info);
|
1620 |
|
|
end Unit_Id_Of;
|
1621 |
|
|
|
1622 |
|
|
------------------------
|
1623 |
|
|
-- Write_Dependencies --
|
1624 |
|
|
------------------------
|
1625 |
|
|
|
1626 |
|
|
procedure Write_Dependencies is
|
1627 |
|
|
begin
|
1628 |
|
|
if not Zero_Formatting then
|
1629 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1630 |
|
|
Write_Str (" ELABORATION ORDER DEPENDENCIES");
|
1631 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1632 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1633 |
|
|
end if;
|
1634 |
|
|
|
1635 |
|
|
Info_Prefix_Suppress := True;
|
1636 |
|
|
|
1637 |
|
|
for S in Succ_First .. Succ.Last loop
|
1638 |
|
|
Elab_Error_Msg (S);
|
1639 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1640 |
|
|
|
1641 |
|
|
Info_Prefix_Suppress := False;
|
1642 |
|
|
|
1643 |
|
|
if not Zero_Formatting then
|
1644 |
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
1645 |
|
|
end if;
|
1646 |
|
|
end Write_Dependencies;
|
1647 |
|
|
|
1648 |
|
|
--------------------------
|
1649 |
|
|
-- Write_Elab_All_Chain --
|
1650 |
|
|
--------------------------
|
1651 |
|
|
|
1652 |
|
|
procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id) is
|
1653 |
|
|
ST : constant Successor_Link := Succ.Table (S);
|
1654 |
|
|
After : constant Unit_Name_Type := Units.Table (ST.After).Uname;
|
1655 |
|
|
|
1656 |
|
|
L : Elab_All_Id;
|
1657 |
|
|
Nam : Unit_Name_Type;
|
1658 |
|
|
|
1659 |
|
|
First_Name : Boolean := True;
|
1660 |
|
|
|
1661 |
|
|
begin
|
1662 |
|
|
if ST.Reason in Elab_All .. Elab_All_Desirable then
|
1663 |
|
|
L := ST.Elab_All_Link;
|
1664 |
|
|
while L /= No_Elab_All_Link loop
|
1665 |
|
|
Nam := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Needed_By;
|
1666 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Nam;
|
1667 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output (" $", Info => True);
|
1668 |
|
|
|
1669 |
|
|
Get_Name_String (Nam);
|
1670 |
|
|
|
1671 |
|
|
if Name_Buffer (Name_Len) = 'b' then
|
1672 |
|
|
if First_Name then
|
1673 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1674 |
|
|
(" must be elaborated along with its spec:",
|
1675 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1676 |
|
|
|
1677 |
|
|
else
|
1678 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1679 |
|
|
(" which must be elaborated " &
|
1680 |
|
|
"along with its spec:",
|
1681 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1682 |
|
|
end if;
|
1683 |
|
|
|
1684 |
|
|
else
|
1685 |
|
|
if First_Name then
|
1686 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1687 |
|
|
(" is withed by:",
|
1688 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1689 |
|
|
|
1690 |
|
|
else
|
1691 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output
|
1692 |
|
|
(" which is withed by:",
|
1693 |
|
|
Info => True);
|
1694 |
|
|
end if;
|
1695 |
|
|
end if;
|
1696 |
|
|
|
1697 |
|
|
First_Name := False;
|
1698 |
|
|
|
1699 |
|
|
L := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Next_Elab;
|
1700 |
|
|
end loop;
|
1701 |
|
|
|
1702 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Unit_1 := After;
|
1703 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Output (" $", Info => True);
|
1704 |
|
|
end if;
|
1705 |
|
|
end Write_Elab_All_Chain;
|
1706 |
|
|
|
1707 |
|
|
end Binde;
|