OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc/openrisc/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-dev/] [or1k-gcc/] [gcc/] [ada/] [binde.adb] - Blame information for rev 866

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 706 jeremybenn
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
--                                                                          --
3
--                         GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS                         --
4
--                                                                          --
5
--                                B I N D E                                 --
6
--                                                                          --
7
--                                 B o d y                                  --
8
--                                                                          --
9
--          Copyright (C) 1992-2010, Free Software Foundation, Inc.         --
10
--                                                                          --
11
-- GNAT is free software;  you can  redistribute it  and/or modify it under --
12
-- terms of the  GNU General Public License as published  by the Free Soft- --
13
-- ware  Foundation;  either version 3,  or (at your option) any later ver- --
14
-- sion.  GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the  implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License --
17
-- for  more details.  You should have  received  a copy of the GNU General --
18
-- Public License  distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3.  If not, go to --
19
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license.          --
20
--                                                                          --
21
-- GNAT was originally developed  by the GNAT team at  New York University. --
22
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc.      --
23
--                                                                          --
24
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25
 
26
with Binderr;  use Binderr;
27
with Butil;    use Butil;
28
with Debug;    use Debug;
29
with Fname;    use Fname;
30
with Namet;    use Namet;
31
with Opt;      use Opt;
32
with Osint;
33
with Output;   use Output;
34
with Targparm; use Targparm;
35
 
36
with System.Case_Util; use System.Case_Util;
37
 
38
package body Binde is
39
 
40
   --  The following data structures are used to represent the graph that is
41
   --  used to determine the elaboration order (using a topological sort).
42
 
43
   --  The following structures are used to record successors. If A is a
44
   --  successor of B in this table, it means that A must be elaborated
45
   --  before B is elaborated.
46
 
47
   type Successor_Id is new Nat;
48
   --  Identification of single successor entry
49
 
50
   No_Successor : constant Successor_Id := 0;
51
   --  Used to indicate end of list of successors
52
 
53
   type Elab_All_Id is new Nat;
54
   --  Identification of Elab_All entry link
55
 
56
   No_Elab_All_Link : constant Elab_All_Id := 0;
57
   --  Used to indicate end of list
58
 
59
   --  Succ_Reason indicates the reason for a particular elaboration link
60
 
61
   type Succ_Reason is
62
     (Withed,
63
      --  After directly with's Before, so the spec of Before must be
64
      --  elaborated before After is elaborated.
65
 
66
      Elab,
67
      --  After directly mentions Before in a pragma Elaborate, so the
68
      --  body of Before must be elaborate before After is elaborated.
69
 
70
      Elab_All,
71
      --  After either mentions Before directly in a pragma Elaborate_All,
72
      --  or mentions a third unit, X, which itself requires that Before be
73
      --  elaborated before unit X is elaborated. The Elab_All_Link list
74
      --  traces the dependencies in the latter case.
75
 
76
      Elab_All_Desirable,
77
      --  This is just like Elab_All, except that the elaborate all was not
78
      --  explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
79
      --  front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
80
 
81
      Elab_Desirable,
82
      --  This is just like Elab, except that the elaborate was not
83
      --  explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
84
      --  front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
85
 
86
      Spec_First);
87
      --  After is a body, and Before is the corresponding spec
88
 
89
   --  Successor_Link contains the information for one link
90
 
91
   type Successor_Link is record
92
      Before : Unit_Id;
93
      --  Predecessor unit
94
 
95
      After : Unit_Id;
96
      --  Successor unit
97
 
98
      Next : Successor_Id;
99
      --  Next successor on this list
100
 
101
      Reason : Succ_Reason;
102
      --  Reason for this link
103
 
104
      Elab_Body : Boolean;
105
      --  Set True if this link is needed for the special Elaborate_Body
106
      --  processing described below.
107
 
108
      Reason_Unit : Unit_Id;
109
      --  For Reason = Elab, or Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, records the unit
110
      --  containing the pragma leading to the link.
111
 
112
      Elab_All_Link : Elab_All_Id;
113
      --  If Reason = Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, then this points to the
114
      --  first elment in a list of Elab_All entries that record the with
115
      --  chain leading resulting in this particular dependency.
116
 
117
   end record;
118
 
119
   --  Note on handling of Elaborate_Body. Basically, if we have a pragma
120
   --  Elaborate_Body in a unit, it means that the spec and body have to
121
   --  be handled as a single entity from the point of view of determining
122
   --  an elaboration order. What we do is to essentially remove the body
123
   --  from consideration completely, and transfer all its links (other
124
   --  than the spec link) to the spec. Then when then the spec gets chosen,
125
   --  we choose the body right afterwards. We mark the links that get moved
126
   --  from the body to the spec by setting their Elab_Body flag True, so
127
   --  that we can understand what is going on!
128
 
129
   Succ_First : constant := 1;
130
 
131
   package Succ is new Table.Table (
132
     Table_Component_Type => Successor_Link,
133
     Table_Index_Type     => Successor_Id,
134
     Table_Low_Bound      => Succ_First,
135
     Table_Initial        => 500,
136
     Table_Increment      => 200,
137
     Table_Name           => "Succ");
138
 
139
   --  For the case of Elaborate_All, the following table is used to record
140
   --  chains of with relationships that lead to the Elab_All link. These
141
   --  are used solely for diagnostic purposes
142
 
143
   type Elab_All_Entry is record
144
      Needed_By : Unit_Name_Type;
145
      --  Name of unit from which referencing unit was with'ed or otherwise
146
      --  needed as a result of Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable.
147
 
148
      Next_Elab : Elab_All_Id;
149
      --  Link to next entry on chain (No_Elab_All_Link marks end of list)
150
   end record;
151
 
152
   package Elab_All_Entries is new Table.Table (
153
     Table_Component_Type => Elab_All_Entry,
154
     Table_Index_Type     => Elab_All_Id,
155
     Table_Low_Bound      => 1,
156
     Table_Initial        => 2000,
157
     Table_Increment      => 200,
158
     Table_Name           => "Elab_All_Entries");
159
 
160
   --  A Unit_Node record is built for each active unit
161
 
162
   type Unit_Node_Record is record
163
 
164
      Successors : Successor_Id;
165
      --  Pointer to list of links for successor nodes
166
 
167
      Num_Pred : Int;
168
      --  Number of predecessors for this unit. Normally non-negative, but
169
      --  can go negative in the case of units chosen by the diagnose error
170
      --  procedure (when cycles are being removed from the graph).
171
 
172
      Nextnp : Unit_Id;
173
      --  Forward pointer for list of units with no predecessors
174
 
175
      Elab_Order : Nat;
176
      --  Position in elaboration order (zero = not placed yet)
177
 
178
      Visited : Boolean;
179
      --  Used in computing transitive closure for elaborate all and
180
      --  also in locating cycles and paths in the diagnose routines.
181
 
182
      Elab_Position : Natural;
183
      --  Initialized to zero. Set non-zero when a unit is chosen and
184
      --  placed in the elaboration order. The value represents the
185
      --  ordinal position in the elaboration order.
186
 
187
   end record;
188
 
189
   package UNR is new Table.Table (
190
     Table_Component_Type => Unit_Node_Record,
191
     Table_Index_Type     => Unit_Id,
192
     Table_Low_Bound      => First_Unit_Entry,
193
     Table_Initial        => 500,
194
     Table_Increment      => 200,
195
     Table_Name           => "UNR");
196
 
197
   No_Pred : Unit_Id;
198
   --  Head of list of items with no predecessors
199
 
200
   Num_Left : Int;
201
   --  Number of entries not yet dealt with
202
 
203
   Cur_Unit : Unit_Id;
204
   --  Current unit, set by Gather_Dependencies, and picked up in Build_Link
205
   --  to set the Reason_Unit field of the created dependency link.
206
 
207
   Num_Chosen : Natural := 0;
208
   --  Number of units chosen in the elaboration order so far
209
 
210
   -----------------------
211
   -- Local Subprograms --
212
   -----------------------
213
 
214
   function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
215
   --  U1 and U2 are both permitted candidates for selection as the next unit
216
   --  to be elaborated. This function determines whether U1 is a better choice
217
   --  than U2, i.e. should be elaborated in preference to U2, based on a set
218
   --  of heuristics that establish a friendly and predictable order (see body
219
   --  for details). The result is True if U1 is a better choice than U2, and
220
   --  False if it is a worse choice, or there is no preference between them.
221
 
222
   procedure Build_Link
223
     (Before : Unit_Id;
224
      After  : Unit_Id;
225
      R      : Succ_Reason;
226
      Ea_Id  : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link);
227
   --  Establish a successor link, Before must be elaborated before After, and
228
   --  the reason for the link is R. Ea_Id is the contents to be placed in the
229
   --  Elab_All_Link of the entry.
230
 
231
   procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id);
232
   --  Chosen is the next entry chosen in the elaboration order. This procedure
233
   --  updates all data structures appropriately.
234
 
235
   function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
236
   pragma Inline (Corresponding_Body);
237
   --  Given a unit which is a spec for which there is a separate body, return
238
   --  the unit id of the body. It is an error to call this routine with a unit
239
   --  that is not a spec, or which does not have a separate body.
240
 
241
   function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
242
   pragma Inline (Corresponding_Spec);
243
   --  Given a unit which is a body for which there is a separate spec, return
244
   --  the unit id of the spec. It is an error to call this routine with a unit
245
   --  that is not a body, or which does not have a separate spec.
246
 
247
   procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
248
   --  Called when no elaboration order can be found. Outputs an appropriate
249
   --  diagnosis of the problem, and then abandons the bind.
250
 
251
   procedure Elab_All_Links
252
     (Before : Unit_Id;
253
      After  : Unit_Id;
254
      Reason : Succ_Reason;
255
      Link   : Elab_All_Id);
256
   --  Used to compute the transitive closure of elaboration links for an
257
   --  Elaborate_All pragma (Reason = Elab_All) or for an indication of
258
   --  Elaborate_All_Desirable (Reason = Elab_All_Desirable). Unit After has
259
   --  a pragma Elaborate_All or the front end has determined that a reference
260
   --  probably requires Elaborate_All is required, and unit Before must be
261
   --  previously elaborated. First a link is built making sure that unit
262
   --  Before is elaborated before After, then a recursive call ensures that
263
   --  we also build links for any units needed by Before (i.e. these units
264
   --  must/should also be elaborated before After). Link is used to build
265
   --  a chain of Elab_All_Entries to explain the reason for a link. The
266
   --  value passed is the chain so far.
267
 
268
   procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id);
269
   --  Given a successor link, outputs an error message of the form
270
   --  "$ must be elaborated before $ ..." where ... is the reason.
271
 
272
   procedure Gather_Dependencies;
273
   --  Compute dependencies, building the Succ and UNR tables
274
 
275
   function Is_Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
276
   pragma Inline (Is_Body_Unit);
277
   --  Determines if given unit is a body
278
 
279
   function Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
280
   --  Returns True if corresponding unit is Pure or Preelaborate. Includes
281
   --  dealing with testing flags on spec if it is given a body.
282
 
283
   function Is_Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
284
   pragma Inline (Is_Waiting_Body);
285
   --  Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
286
   --  not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
287
 
288
   function Make_Elab_Entry
289
     (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
290
      Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id;
291
   --  Make an Elab_All_Entries table entry with the given Unam and Link
292
 
293
   function Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
294
   --  This is like Better_Choice, and has the same interface, but returns
295
   --  true if U1 is a worse choice than U2 in the sense of the -p (pessimistic
296
   --  elaboration order) switch. We still have to obey Ada rules, so it is
297
   --  not quite the direct inverse of Better_Choice.
298
 
299
   function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id;
300
   --  This function uses the Info field set in the names table to obtain
301
   --  the unit Id of a unit, given its name id value.
302
 
303
   procedure Write_Dependencies;
304
   --  Write out dependencies (called only if appropriate option is set)
305
 
306
   procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id);
307
   --  If the reason for the link S is Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable,
308
   --  then this routine will output the "needed by" explanation chain.
309
 
310
   -------------------
311
   -- Better_Choice --
312
   -------------------
313
 
314
   function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
315
      UT1 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U1);
316
      UT2 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U2);
317
 
318
   begin
319
      if Debug_Flag_B then
320
         Write_Str ("Better_Choice (");
321
         Write_Unit_Name (UT1.Uname);
322
         Write_Str (", ");
323
         Write_Unit_Name (UT2.Uname);
324
         Write_Line (")");
325
      end if;
326
 
327
      --  Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
328
      --  significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
329
 
330
      --  Prefer a waiting body to one that is not a waiting body
331
 
332
      if Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
333
         if Debug_Flag_B then
334
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is waiting body, u2 is not");
335
         end if;
336
 
337
         return True;
338
 
339
      elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U2) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U1) then
340
         if Debug_Flag_B then
341
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is waiting body, u1 is not");
342
         end if;
343
 
344
         return False;
345
 
346
      --  Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
347
 
348
      elsif UT1.Predefined and then not UT2.Predefined then
349
         if Debug_Flag_B then
350
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is predefined, u2 is not");
351
         end if;
352
 
353
         return True;
354
 
355
      elsif UT2.Predefined and then not UT1.Predefined then
356
         if Debug_Flag_B then
357
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is predefined, u1 is not");
358
         end if;
359
 
360
         return False;
361
 
362
      --  Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
363
 
364
      elsif UT1.Internal and then not UT2.Internal then
365
         if Debug_Flag_B then
366
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is internal, u2 is not");
367
         end if;
368
         return True;
369
 
370
      elsif UT2.Internal and then not UT1.Internal then
371
         if Debug_Flag_B then
372
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is internal, u1 is not");
373
         end if;
374
 
375
         return False;
376
 
377
      --  Prefer a pure or preelaborable unit to one that is not
378
 
379
      elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
380
              and then not
381
            Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
382
      then
383
         if Debug_Flag_B then
384
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is pure/preelab, u2 is not");
385
         end if;
386
 
387
         return True;
388
 
389
      elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
390
              and then not
391
            Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
392
      then
393
         if Debug_Flag_B then
394
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is pure/preelab, u1 is not");
395
         end if;
396
 
397
         return False;
398
 
399
      --  Prefer a body to a spec
400
 
401
      elsif Is_Body_Unit (U1) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U2) then
402
         if Debug_Flag_B then
403
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is body, u2 is not");
404
         end if;
405
 
406
         return True;
407
 
408
      elsif Is_Body_Unit (U2) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U1) then
409
         if Debug_Flag_B then
410
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is body, u1 is not");
411
         end if;
412
 
413
         return False;
414
 
415
      --  If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
416
      --  more recently elaborated. Consider the following:
417
 
418
      --     spec of A
419
      --     spec of B
420
      --     body of A or B?
421
 
422
      --  The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
423
      --  A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
424
      --  must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
425
      --  to put the body of B first.
426
 
427
      elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
428
         declare
429
            Result : constant Boolean :=
430
                       UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position >
431
                       UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
432
         begin
433
            if Debug_Flag_B then
434
               if Result then
435
                  Write_Line ("  True: based on waiting body elab positions");
436
               else
437
                  Write_Line ("  False: based on waiting body elab positions");
438
               end if;
439
            end if;
440
 
441
            return Result;
442
         end;
443
      end if;
444
 
445
      --  Remaining choice rules are disabled by Debug flag -do
446
 
447
      if not Debug_Flag_O then
448
 
449
         --  The following deal with the case of specs which have been marked
450
         --  as Elaborate_Body_Desirable. We generally want to delay these
451
         --  specs as long as possible, so that the bodies have a better chance
452
         --  of being elaborated closer to the specs.
453
 
454
         --  If we have two units, one of which is a spec for which this flag
455
         --  is set, and the other is not, we prefer to delay the spec for
456
         --  which the flag is set.
457
 
458
         if not UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
459
           and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
460
         then
461
            if Debug_Flag_B then
462
               Write_Line ("  True: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
463
            end if;
464
 
465
            return True;
466
 
467
         elsif not UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
468
           and then UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
469
         then
470
            if Debug_Flag_B then
471
               Write_Line ("  False: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
472
            end if;
473
 
474
            return False;
475
 
476
            --  If we have two specs that are both marked as Elaborate_Body
477
            --  desirable, we prefer the one whose body is nearer to being able
478
            --  to be elaborated, based on the Num_Pred count. This helps to
479
            --  ensure bodies are as close to specs as possible.
480
 
481
         elsif UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
482
           and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
483
         then
484
            declare
485
               Result : constant Boolean :=
486
                          UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U1)).Num_Pred <
487
                          UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U2)).Num_Pred;
488
            begin
489
               if Debug_Flag_B then
490
                  if Result then
491
                     Write_Line ("  True based on Num_Pred compare");
492
                  else
493
                     Write_Line ("  False based on Num_Pred compare");
494
                  end if;
495
               end if;
496
 
497
               return Result;
498
            end;
499
         end if;
500
      end if;
501
 
502
      --  If we fall through, it means that no preference rule applies, so we
503
      --  use alphabetical order to at least give a deterministic result.
504
 
505
      if Debug_Flag_B then
506
         Write_Line ("  choose on alpha order");
507
      end if;
508
 
509
      return Uname_Less (UT1.Uname, UT2.Uname);
510
   end Better_Choice;
511
 
512
   ----------------
513
   -- Build_Link --
514
   ----------------
515
 
516
   procedure Build_Link
517
     (Before : Unit_Id;
518
      After  : Unit_Id;
519
      R      : Succ_Reason;
520
      Ea_Id  : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link)
521
   is
522
      Cspec : Unit_Id;
523
 
524
   begin
525
      Succ.Increment_Last;
526
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Before          := Before;
527
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Next            := UNR.Table (Before).Successors;
528
      UNR.Table (Before).Successors          := Succ.Last;
529
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason          := R;
530
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason_Unit     := Cur_Unit;
531
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_All_Link   := Ea_Id;
532
 
533
      --  Deal with special Elab_Body case. If the After of this link is
534
      --  a body whose spec has Elaborate_All set, and this is not the link
535
      --  directly from the body to the spec, then we make the After of the
536
      --  link reference its spec instead, marking the link appropriately.
537
 
538
      if Units.Table (After).Utype = Is_Body then
539
         Cspec := Corresponding_Spec (After);
540
 
541
         if Units.Table (Cspec).Elaborate_Body
542
           and then Cspec /= Before
543
         then
544
            Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After     := Cspec;
545
            Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := True;
546
            UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred       := UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred + 1;
547
            return;
548
         end if;
549
      end if;
550
 
551
      --  Fall through on normal case
552
 
553
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After           := After;
554
      Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body       := False;
555
      UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred             := UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred + 1;
556
   end Build_Link;
557
 
558
   ------------
559
   -- Choose --
560
   ------------
561
 
562
   procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id) is
563
      S : Successor_Id;
564
      U : Unit_Id;
565
 
566
   begin
567
      if Debug_Flag_C then
568
         Write_Str ("Choosing Unit ");
569
         Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (Chosen).Uname);
570
         Write_Eol;
571
      end if;
572
 
573
      --  Add to elaboration order. Note that units having no elaboration
574
      --  code are not treated specially yet. The special casing of this
575
      --  is in Bindgen, where Gen_Elab_Calls skips over them. Meanwhile
576
      --  we need them here, because the object file list is also driven
577
      --  by the contents of the Elab_Order table.
578
 
579
      Elab_Order.Increment_Last;
580
      Elab_Order.Table (Elab_Order.Last) := Chosen;
581
 
582
      --  Remove from No_Pred list. This is a little inefficient and may
583
      --  be we should doubly link the list, but it will do for now!
584
 
585
      if No_Pred = Chosen then
586
         No_Pred := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
587
 
588
      else
589
         --  Note that we just ignore the situation where it does not
590
         --  appear in the No_Pred list, this happens in calls from the
591
         --  Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem routine, where cycles are being
592
         --  removed arbitrarily from the graph.
593
 
594
         U := No_Pred;
595
         while U /= No_Unit_Id loop
596
            if UNR.Table (U).Nextnp = Chosen then
597
               UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
598
               exit;
599
            end if;
600
 
601
            U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
602
         end loop;
603
      end if;
604
 
605
      --  For all successors, decrement the number of predecessors, and
606
      --  if it becomes zero, then add to no predecessor list.
607
 
608
      S := UNR.Table (Chosen).Successors;
609
      while S /= No_Successor loop
610
         U := Succ.Table (S).After;
611
         UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred - 1;
612
 
613
         if Debug_Flag_N then
614
            Write_Str ("  decrementing Num_Pred for unit ");
615
            Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
616
            Write_Str (" new value = ");
617
            Write_Int (UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred);
618
            Write_Eol;
619
         end if;
620
 
621
         if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
622
            UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
623
            No_Pred := U;
624
         end if;
625
 
626
         S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
627
      end loop;
628
 
629
      --  All done, adjust number of units left count and set elaboration pos
630
 
631
      Num_Left := Num_Left - 1;
632
      Num_Chosen := Num_Chosen + 1;
633
      UNR.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
634
      Units.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
635
 
636
      --  If we just chose a spec with Elaborate_Body set, then we
637
      --  must immediately elaborate the body, before any other units.
638
 
639
      if Units.Table (Chosen).Elaborate_Body then
640
 
641
         --  If the unit is a spec only, then there is no body. This is a bit
642
         --  odd given that Elaborate_Body is here, but it is valid in an
643
         --  RCI unit, where we only have the interface in the stub bind.
644
 
645
         if Units.Table (Chosen).Utype = Is_Spec_Only
646
           and then Units.Table (Chosen).RCI
647
         then
648
            null;
649
         else
650
            Choose (Corresponding_Body (Chosen));
651
         end if;
652
      end if;
653
   end Choose;
654
 
655
   ------------------------
656
   -- Corresponding_Body --
657
   ------------------------
658
 
659
   --  Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
660
   --  two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
661
   --  first and the spec appearing second.
662
 
663
   function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
664
   begin
665
      pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Spec);
666
      return U - 1;
667
   end Corresponding_Body;
668
 
669
   ------------------------
670
   -- Corresponding_Spec --
671
   ------------------------
672
 
673
   --  Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
674
   --  two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
675
   --  first and the spec appearing second.
676
 
677
   function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
678
   begin
679
      pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body);
680
      return U + 1;
681
   end Corresponding_Spec;
682
 
683
   ----------------------------------
684
   -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem --
685
   ----------------------------------
686
 
687
   procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem is
688
 
689
      function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean;
690
      --  Recursive routine used to find a path from node Ufrom to node Uto.
691
      --  If a path exists, returns True and outputs an appropriate set of
692
      --  error messages giving the path. Also calls Choose for each of the
693
      --  nodes so that they get removed from the remaining set. There are
694
      --  two cases of calls, either Ufrom = Uto for an attempt to find a
695
      --  cycle, or Ufrom is a spec and Uto the corresponding body for the
696
      --  case of an unsatisfiable Elaborate_Body pragma. ML is the minimum
697
      --  acceptable length for a path.
698
 
699
      ---------------
700
      -- Find_Path --
701
      ---------------
702
 
703
      function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean is
704
 
705
         function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean;
706
         --  This is the inner recursive routine, it determines if a path
707
         --  exists from U to Uto, and if so returns True and outputs the
708
         --  appropriate set of error messages. PL is the path length
709
 
710
         ---------------
711
         -- Find_Link --
712
         ---------------
713
 
714
         function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean is
715
            S : Successor_Id;
716
 
717
         begin
718
            --  Recursion ends if we are at terminating node and the path
719
            --  is sufficiently long, generate error message and return True.
720
 
721
            if U = Uto and then PL >= ML then
722
               Choose (U);
723
               return True;
724
 
725
            --  All done if already visited, otherwise mark as visited
726
 
727
            elsif UNR.Table (U).Visited then
728
               return False;
729
 
730
            --  Otherwise mark as visited and look at all successors
731
 
732
            else
733
               UNR.Table (U).Visited := True;
734
 
735
               S := UNR.Table (U).Successors;
736
               while S /= No_Successor loop
737
                  if Find_Link (Succ.Table (S).After, PL + 1) then
738
                     Elab_Error_Msg (S);
739
                     Choose (U);
740
                     return True;
741
                  end if;
742
 
743
                  S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
744
               end loop;
745
 
746
               --  Falling through means this does not lead to a path
747
 
748
               return False;
749
            end if;
750
         end Find_Link;
751
 
752
      --  Start of processing for Find_Path
753
 
754
      begin
755
         --  Initialize all non-chosen nodes to not visisted yet
756
 
757
         for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
758
            UNR.Table (U).Visited := UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position /= 0;
759
         end loop;
760
 
761
         --  Now try to find the path
762
 
763
         return Find_Link (Ufrom, 0);
764
      end Find_Path;
765
 
766
   --  Start of processing for Diagnose_Elaboration_Error
767
 
768
   begin
769
      Set_Standard_Error;
770
 
771
      --  Output state of things if debug flag N set
772
 
773
      if Debug_Flag_N then
774
         declare
775
            NP : Int;
776
 
777
         begin
778
            Write_Eol;
779
            Write_Eol;
780
            Write_Str ("Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem called");
781
            Write_Eol;
782
            Write_Str ("List of remaining unchosen units and predecessors");
783
            Write_Eol;
784
 
785
            for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
786
               if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
787
                  NP := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred;
788
                  Write_Eol;
789
                  Write_Str ("  Unchosen unit: #");
790
                  Write_Int (Int (U));
791
                  Write_Str ("  ");
792
                  Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
793
                  Write_Str (" (Num_Pred = ");
794
                  Write_Int (NP);
795
                  Write_Char (')');
796
                  Write_Eol;
797
 
798
                  if NP = 0 then
799
                     if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
800
                        Write_Str
801
                          ("    (not chosen because of Elaborate_Body)");
802
                        Write_Eol;
803
                     else
804
                        Write_Str ("  ****************** why not chosen?");
805
                        Write_Eol;
806
                     end if;
807
                  end if;
808
 
809
                  --  Search links list to find unchosen predecessors
810
 
811
                  for S in Succ.First .. Succ.Last loop
812
                     declare
813
                        SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
814
 
815
                     begin
816
                        if SL.After = U
817
                          and then UNR.Table (SL.Before).Elab_Position = 0
818
                        then
819
                           Write_Str ("    unchosen predecessor: #");
820
                           Write_Int (Int (SL.Before));
821
                           Write_Str ("  ");
822
                           Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname);
823
                           Write_Eol;
824
                           NP := NP - 1;
825
                        end if;
826
                     end;
827
                  end loop;
828
 
829
                  if NP /= 0 then
830
                     Write_Str ("  **************** Num_Pred value wrong!");
831
                     Write_Eol;
832
                  end if;
833
               end if;
834
            end loop;
835
         end;
836
      end if;
837
 
838
      --  Output the header for the error, and manually increment the
839
      --  error count. We are using Error_Msg_Output rather than Error_Msg
840
      --  here for two reasons:
841
 
842
      --    This is really only one error, not one for each line
843
      --    We want this output on standard output since it is voluminous
844
 
845
      --  But we do need to deal with the error count manually in this case
846
 
847
      Errors_Detected := Errors_Detected + 1;
848
      Error_Msg_Output ("elaboration circularity detected", Info => False);
849
 
850
      --  Try to find cycles starting with any of the remaining nodes that have
851
      --  not yet been chosen. There must be at least one (there is some reason
852
      --  we are being called!)
853
 
854
      for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
855
         if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
856
            if Find_Path (U, U, 1) then
857
               raise Unrecoverable_Error;
858
            end if;
859
         end if;
860
      end loop;
861
 
862
      --  We should never get here, since we were called for some reason,
863
      --  and we should have found and eliminated at least one bad path.
864
 
865
      raise Program_Error;
866
   end Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
867
 
868
   --------------------
869
   -- Elab_All_Links --
870
   --------------------
871
 
872
   procedure Elab_All_Links
873
     (Before : Unit_Id;
874
      After  : Unit_Id;
875
      Reason : Succ_Reason;
876
      Link   : Elab_All_Id)
877
   is
878
   begin
879
      if UNR.Table (Before).Visited then
880
         return;
881
      end if;
882
 
883
      --  Build the direct link for Before
884
 
885
      UNR.Table (Before).Visited := True;
886
      Build_Link (Before, After, Reason, Link);
887
 
888
      --  Process all units with'ed by Before recursively
889
 
890
      for W in
891
        Units.Table (Before).First_With .. Units.Table (Before).Last_With
892
      loop
893
         --  Skip if this with is an interface to a stand-alone library.
894
         --  Skip also if no ALI file for this WITH, happens for language
895
         --  defined generics while bootstrapping the compiler (see body of
896
         --  Lib.Writ.Write_With_Lines). Finally, skip if it is a limited
897
         --  with clause, which does not impose an elaboration link.
898
 
899
         if not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface
900
           and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
901
           and then not Withs.Table (W).Limited_With
902
         then
903
            declare
904
               Info : constant Int :=
905
                        Get_Name_Table_Info
906
                          (Withs.Table (W).Uname);
907
 
908
            begin
909
               --  If the unit is unknown, for some unknown reason, fail
910
               --  graciously explaining that the unit is unknown. Without
911
               --  this check, gnatbind will crash in Unit_Id_Of.
912
 
913
               if Info = 0 or else Unit_Id (Info) = No_Unit_Id then
914
                  declare
915
                     Withed       : String :=
916
                                      Get_Name_String (Withs.Table (W).Uname);
917
                     Last_Withed  : Natural := Withed'Last;
918
                     Withing      : String :=
919
                                      Get_Name_String
920
                                        (Units.Table (Before).Uname);
921
                     Last_Withing : Natural := Withing'Last;
922
                     Spec_Body    : String  := " (Spec)";
923
 
924
                  begin
925
                     To_Mixed (Withed);
926
                     To_Mixed (Withing);
927
 
928
                     if Last_Withed > 2 and then
929
                       Withed (Last_Withed - 1) = '%'
930
                     then
931
                        Last_Withed := Last_Withed - 2;
932
                     end if;
933
 
934
                     if Last_Withing > 2 and then
935
                       Withing (Last_Withing - 1) = '%'
936
                     then
937
                        Last_Withing := Last_Withing - 2;
938
                     end if;
939
 
940
                     if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Body or else
941
                       Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Body_Only
942
                     then
943
                        Spec_Body := " (Body)";
944
                     end if;
945
 
946
                     Osint.Fail
947
                       ("could not find unit "
948
                        & Withed (Withed'First .. Last_Withed) & " needed by "
949
                        & Withing (Withing'First .. Last_Withing) & Spec_Body);
950
                  end;
951
               end if;
952
 
953
               Elab_All_Links
954
                 (Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname),
955
                  After,
956
                  Reason,
957
                  Make_Elab_Entry (Withs.Table (W).Uname, Link));
958
            end;
959
         end if;
960
      end loop;
961
 
962
      --  Process corresponding body, if there is one
963
 
964
      if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Spec then
965
         Elab_All_Links
966
           (Corresponding_Body (Before),
967
            After, Reason,
968
            Make_Elab_Entry
969
              (Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (Before)).Uname, Link));
970
      end if;
971
   end Elab_All_Links;
972
 
973
   --------------------
974
   -- Elab_Error_Msg --
975
   --------------------
976
 
977
   procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id) is
978
      SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
979
 
980
   begin
981
      --  Nothing to do if internal unit involved and no -da flag
982
 
983
      if not Debug_Flag_A
984
        and then
985
          (Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Sfile)
986
            or else
987
           Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.After).Sfile))
988
      then
989
         return;
990
      end if;
991
 
992
      --  Here we want to generate output
993
 
994
      Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
995
 
996
      if SL.Elab_Body then
997
         Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (SL.After)).Uname;
998
      else
999
         Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
1000
      end if;
1001
 
1002
      Error_Msg_Output ("  $ must be elaborated before $", Info => True);
1003
 
1004
      Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Reason_Unit).Uname;
1005
 
1006
      case SL.Reason is
1007
         when Withed =>
1008
            Error_Msg_Output
1009
              ("     reason: with clause",
1010
               Info => True);
1011
 
1012
         when Elab =>
1013
            Error_Msg_Output
1014
              ("     reason: pragma Elaborate in unit $",
1015
               Info => True);
1016
 
1017
         when Elab_All =>
1018
            Error_Msg_Output
1019
              ("     reason: pragma Elaborate_All in unit $",
1020
               Info => True);
1021
 
1022
         when Elab_All_Desirable =>
1023
            Error_Msg_Output
1024
              ("     reason: implicit Elaborate_All in unit $",
1025
               Info => True);
1026
 
1027
            Error_Msg_Output
1028
              ("     recompile $ with -gnatwl for full details",
1029
               Info => True);
1030
 
1031
         when Elab_Desirable =>
1032
            Error_Msg_Output
1033
              ("     reason: implicit Elaborate in unit $",
1034
               Info => True);
1035
 
1036
            Error_Msg_Output
1037
              ("     recompile $ with -gnatwl for full details",
1038
               Info => True);
1039
 
1040
         when Spec_First =>
1041
            Error_Msg_Output
1042
              ("     reason: spec always elaborated before body",
1043
               Info => True);
1044
      end case;
1045
 
1046
      Write_Elab_All_Chain (S);
1047
 
1048
      if SL.Elab_Body then
1049
         Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
1050
         Error_Msg_Unit_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
1051
         Error_Msg_Output
1052
           ("  $ must therefore be elaborated before $",
1053
            True);
1054
 
1055
         Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
1056
         Error_Msg_Output
1057
           ("     (because $ has a pragma Elaborate_Body)",
1058
            True);
1059
      end if;
1060
 
1061
      if not Zero_Formatting then
1062
         Write_Eol;
1063
      end if;
1064
   end Elab_Error_Msg;
1065
 
1066
   ---------------------
1067
   -- Find_Elab_Order --
1068
   ---------------------
1069
 
1070
   procedure Find_Elab_Order is
1071
      U           : Unit_Id;
1072
      Best_So_Far : Unit_Id;
1073
 
1074
   begin
1075
      Succ.Init;
1076
      Num_Left := Int (Units.Last - Units.First + 1);
1077
 
1078
      --  Initialize unit table for elaboration control
1079
 
1080
      for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
1081
         UNR.Increment_Last;
1082
         UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Successors    := No_Successor;
1083
         UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Num_Pred      := 0;
1084
         UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Nextnp        := No_Unit_Id;
1085
         UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Order    := 0;
1086
         UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Position := 0;
1087
      end loop;
1088
 
1089
      --  Output warning if -p used with no -gnatE units
1090
 
1091
      if Pessimistic_Elab_Order
1092
        and not Dynamic_Elaboration_Checks_Specified
1093
      then
1094
         if OpenVMS_On_Target then
1095
            Error_Msg ("?use of /PESSIMISTIC_ELABORATION questionable");
1096
         else
1097
            Error_Msg ("?use of -p switch questionable");
1098
         end if;
1099
 
1100
         Error_Msg ("?since all units compiled with static elaboration model");
1101
      end if;
1102
 
1103
      --  Gather dependencies and output them if option set
1104
 
1105
      Gather_Dependencies;
1106
 
1107
      --  Output elaboration dependencies if option is set
1108
 
1109
      if Elab_Dependency_Output or Debug_Flag_E then
1110
         Write_Dependencies;
1111
      end if;
1112
 
1113
      --  Initialize the no predecessor list
1114
 
1115
      No_Pred := No_Unit_Id;
1116
 
1117
      for U in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1118
         if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
1119
            UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
1120
            No_Pred := U;
1121
         end if;
1122
      end loop;
1123
 
1124
      --  OK, now we determine the elaboration order proper. All we do is to
1125
      --  select the best choice from the no predecessor list until all the
1126
      --  nodes have been chosen.
1127
 
1128
      Outer : loop
1129
 
1130
         --  If there are no nodes with predecessors, then either we are
1131
         --  done, as indicated by Num_Left being set to zero, or we have
1132
         --  a circularity. In the latter case, diagnose the circularity,
1133
         --  removing it from the graph and continue
1134
 
1135
         Get_No_Pred : while No_Pred = No_Unit_Id loop
1136
            exit Outer when Num_Left < 1;
1137
            Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
1138
         end loop Get_No_Pred;
1139
 
1140
         U := No_Pred;
1141
         Best_So_Far := No_Unit_Id;
1142
 
1143
         --  Loop to choose best entry in No_Pred list
1144
 
1145
         No_Pred_Search : loop
1146
            if Debug_Flag_N then
1147
               Write_Str ("  considering choice of ");
1148
               Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
1149
               Write_Eol;
1150
 
1151
               if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
1152
                  Write_Str
1153
                    ("    Elaborate_Body = True, Num_Pred for body = ");
1154
                  Write_Int
1155
                    (UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U)).Num_Pred);
1156
               else
1157
                  Write_Str
1158
                    ("    Elaborate_Body = False");
1159
               end if;
1160
 
1161
               Write_Eol;
1162
            end if;
1163
 
1164
            --  This is a candididate to be considered for choice
1165
 
1166
            if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id
1167
              or else ((not Pessimistic_Elab_Order)
1168
                         and then Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
1169
              or else (Pessimistic_Elab_Order
1170
                         and then Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
1171
            then
1172
               if Debug_Flag_N then
1173
                  Write_Str ("    tentatively chosen (best so far)");
1174
                  Write_Eol;
1175
               end if;
1176
 
1177
               Best_So_Far := U;
1178
            end if;
1179
 
1180
            U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
1181
            exit No_Pred_Search when U = No_Unit_Id;
1182
         end loop No_Pred_Search;
1183
 
1184
         --  If no candididate chosen, it means that no unit has No_Pred = 0,
1185
         --  but there are units left, hence we have a circular dependency,
1186
         --  which we will get Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem to diagnose it.
1187
 
1188
         if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id then
1189
            Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
1190
 
1191
         --  Otherwise choose the best candidate found
1192
 
1193
         else
1194
            Choose (Best_So_Far);
1195
         end if;
1196
      end loop Outer;
1197
   end Find_Elab_Order;
1198
 
1199
   -------------------------
1200
   -- Gather_Dependencies --
1201
   -------------------------
1202
 
1203
   procedure Gather_Dependencies is
1204
      Withed_Unit : Unit_Id;
1205
 
1206
   begin
1207
      --  Loop through all units
1208
 
1209
      for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
1210
         Cur_Unit := U;
1211
 
1212
         --  If this is not an interface to a stand-alone library and
1213
         --  there is a body and a spec, then spec must be elaborated first
1214
         --  Note that the corresponding spec immediately follows the body
1215
 
1216
         if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface
1217
           and then Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1218
         then
1219
            Build_Link (Corresponding_Spec (U), U, Spec_First);
1220
         end if;
1221
 
1222
         --  If this unit is not an interface to a stand-alone library,
1223
         --  process WITH references for this unit ignoring generic units and
1224
         --  interfaces to stand-alone libraries.
1225
 
1226
         if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface then
1227
            for
1228
              W in Units.Table (U).First_With .. Units.Table (U).Last_With
1229
            loop
1230
               if Withs.Table (W).Sfile /= No_File
1231
                 and then (not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface)
1232
               then
1233
                  --  Check for special case of withing a unit that does not
1234
                  --  exist any more. If the unit was completely missing we
1235
                  --  would already have detected this, but a nasty case arises
1236
                  --  when we have a subprogram body with no spec, and some
1237
                  --  obsolete unit with's a previous (now disappeared) spec.
1238
 
1239
                  if Get_Name_Table_Info (Withs.Table (W).Uname) = 0 then
1240
                     Error_Msg_File_1 := Units.Table (U).Sfile;
1241
                     Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Withs.Table (W).Uname;
1242
                     Error_Msg ("{ depends on $ which no longer exists");
1243
                     goto Next_With;
1244
                  end if;
1245
 
1246
                  Withed_Unit := Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname);
1247
 
1248
                  --  Pragma Elaborate_All case, for this we use the recursive
1249
                  --  Elab_All_Links procedure to establish the links.
1250
 
1251
                  if Withs.Table (W).Elaborate_All then
1252
 
1253
                     --  Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1254
                     --  node.
1255
 
1256
                     for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1257
                        UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1258
                     end loop;
1259
 
1260
                     --  Now establish all the links we need
1261
 
1262
                     Elab_All_Links
1263
                       (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All,
1264
                        Make_Elab_Entry
1265
                          (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1266
 
1267
                  --  Elaborate_All_Desirable case, for this we establish the
1268
                  --  same links as above, but with a different reason.
1269
 
1270
                  elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_All_Desirable then
1271
 
1272
                     --  Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1273
                     --  node.
1274
 
1275
                     for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1276
                        UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1277
                     end loop;
1278
 
1279
                     --  Now establish all the links we need
1280
 
1281
                     Elab_All_Links
1282
                       (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All_Desirable,
1283
                        Make_Elab_Entry
1284
                          (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1285
 
1286
                  --  Pragma Elaborate case. We must build a link for the
1287
                  --  withed unit itself, and also the corresponding body if
1288
                  --  there is one.
1289
 
1290
                  --  However, skip this processing if there is no ALI file for
1291
                  --  the WITH entry, because this means it is a generic (even
1292
                  --  when we fix the generics so that an ALI file is present,
1293
                  --  we probably still will have no ALI file for unchecked and
1294
                  --  other special cases).
1295
 
1296
                  elsif Withs.Table (W).Elaborate
1297
                    and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
1298
                  then
1299
                     Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1300
 
1301
                     if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
1302
                        Build_Link
1303
                          (Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit), U, Elab);
1304
                     end if;
1305
 
1306
                  --  Elaborate_Desirable case, for this we establish
1307
                  --  the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1308
 
1309
                  elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_Desirable then
1310
                     Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1311
 
1312
                     if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
1313
                        Build_Link
1314
                          (Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit),
1315
                           U, Elab_Desirable);
1316
                     end if;
1317
 
1318
                  --  A limited_with does not establish an elaboration
1319
                  --  dependence (that's the whole point!).
1320
 
1321
                  elsif Withs.Table (W).Limited_With then
1322
                     null;
1323
 
1324
                  --  Case of normal WITH with no elaboration pragmas, just
1325
                  --  build the single link to the directly referenced unit
1326
 
1327
                  else
1328
                     Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1329
                  end if;
1330
               end if;
1331
 
1332
               <<Next_With>>
1333
               null;
1334
            end loop;
1335
         end if;
1336
      end loop;
1337
   end Gather_Dependencies;
1338
 
1339
   ------------------
1340
   -- Is_Body_Unit --
1341
   ------------------
1342
 
1343
   function Is_Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1344
   begin
1345
      return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1346
        or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
1347
   end Is_Body_Unit;
1348
 
1349
   -----------------------------
1350
   -- Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit --
1351
   -----------------------------
1352
 
1353
   function Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1354
   begin
1355
      --  If we have a body with separate spec, test flags on the spec
1356
 
1357
      if Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body then
1358
         return Units.Table (U + 1).Preelab
1359
                  or else
1360
                Units.Table (U + 1).Pure;
1361
 
1362
      --  Otherwise we have a spec or body acting as spec, test flags on unit
1363
 
1364
      else
1365
         return Units.Table (U).Preelab
1366
                  or else
1367
                Units.Table (U).Pure;
1368
      end if;
1369
   end Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit;
1370
 
1371
   ---------------------
1372
   -- Is_Waiting_Body --
1373
   ---------------------
1374
 
1375
   function Is_Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1376
   begin
1377
      return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1378
        and then UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
1379
   end Is_Waiting_Body;
1380
 
1381
   ---------------------
1382
   -- Make_Elab_Entry --
1383
   ---------------------
1384
 
1385
   function Make_Elab_Entry
1386
     (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
1387
      Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id
1388
   is
1389
   begin
1390
      Elab_All_Entries.Increment_Last;
1391
      Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Needed_By := Unam;
1392
      Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Next_Elab := Link;
1393
      return Elab_All_Entries.Last;
1394
   end Make_Elab_Entry;
1395
 
1396
   -------------------------------
1397
   -- Pessimistic_Better_Choice --
1398
   -------------------------------
1399
 
1400
   function Pessimistic_Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1401
      UT1 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U1);
1402
      UT2 : Unit_Record renames Units.Table (U2);
1403
 
1404
   begin
1405
      if Debug_Flag_B then
1406
         Write_Str ("Pessimistic_Better_Choice (");
1407
         Write_Unit_Name (UT1.Uname);
1408
         Write_Str (", ");
1409
         Write_Unit_Name (UT2.Uname);
1410
         Write_Line (")");
1411
      end if;
1412
 
1413
      --  Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
1414
      --  significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
1415
 
1416
      --  If either unit is predefined or internal, then we use the normal
1417
      --  Better_Choice rule, since we don't want to disturb the elaboration
1418
      --  rules of the language with -p, same treatment for Pure/Preelab.
1419
 
1420
      --  Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
1421
 
1422
      if UT1.Predefined and then not UT2.Predefined then
1423
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1424
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is predefined, u2 is not");
1425
         end if;
1426
 
1427
         return True;
1428
 
1429
      elsif UT2.Predefined and then not UT1.Predefined then
1430
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1431
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is predefined, u1 is not");
1432
         end if;
1433
 
1434
         return False;
1435
 
1436
      --  Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
1437
 
1438
      elsif UT1.Internal and then not UT2.Internal then
1439
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1440
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is internal, u2 is not");
1441
         end if;
1442
 
1443
         return True;
1444
 
1445
      elsif UT2.Internal and then not UT1.Internal then
1446
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1447
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is internal, u1 is not");
1448
         end if;
1449
 
1450
         return False;
1451
 
1452
      --  Prefer a pure or preelaborable unit to one that is not
1453
 
1454
      elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
1455
              and then not
1456
            Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
1457
      then
1458
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1459
            Write_Line ("  True: u1 is pure/preelab, u2 is not");
1460
         end if;
1461
 
1462
         return True;
1463
 
1464
      elsif Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U2)
1465
              and then not
1466
            Is_Pure_Or_Preelab_Unit (U1)
1467
      then
1468
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1469
            Write_Line ("  False: u2 is pure/preelab, u1 is not");
1470
         end if;
1471
 
1472
         return False;
1473
 
1474
      --  Prefer anything else to a waiting body. We want to make bodies wait
1475
      --  as long as possible, till we are forced to choose them!
1476
 
1477
      elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
1478
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1479
            Write_Line ("  False: u1 is waiting body, u2 is not");
1480
         end if;
1481
 
1482
         return False;
1483
 
1484
      elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U2) and then not Is_Waiting_Body (U1) then
1485
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1486
            Write_Line ("  True: u2 is waiting body, u1 is not");
1487
         end if;
1488
 
1489
         return True;
1490
 
1491
      --  Prefer a spec to a body (!)
1492
 
1493
      elsif Is_Body_Unit (U1) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U2) then
1494
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1495
            Write_Line ("  False: u1 is body, u2 is not");
1496
         end if;
1497
 
1498
         return False;
1499
 
1500
      elsif Is_Body_Unit (U2) and then not Is_Body_Unit (U1) then
1501
         if Debug_Flag_B then
1502
            Write_Line ("  True: u2 is body, u1 is not");
1503
         end if;
1504
 
1505
         return True;
1506
 
1507
      --  If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
1508
      --  less recently elaborated. Consider the following:
1509
 
1510
      --     spec of A
1511
      --     spec of B
1512
      --     body of A or B?
1513
 
1514
      --  The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
1515
      --  A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
1516
      --  must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
1517
      --  to put the body of B last so that if there is an elaboration order
1518
      --  problem, we will find it (that's what pessimistic order is about)
1519
 
1520
      elsif Is_Waiting_Body (U1) and then Is_Waiting_Body (U2) then
1521
         declare
1522
            Result : constant Boolean :=
1523
                       UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position <
1524
                       UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
1525
         begin
1526
            if Debug_Flag_B then
1527
               if Result then
1528
                  Write_Line ("  True: based on waiting body elab positions");
1529
               else
1530
                  Write_Line ("  False: based on waiting body elab positions");
1531
               end if;
1532
            end if;
1533
 
1534
            return Result;
1535
         end;
1536
      end if;
1537
 
1538
      --  Remaining choice rules are disabled by Debug flag -do
1539
 
1540
      if not Debug_Flag_O then
1541
 
1542
         --  The following deal with the case of specs which have been marked
1543
         --  as Elaborate_Body_Desirable. In the normal case, we generally want
1544
         --  to delay the elaboration of these specs as long as possible, so
1545
         --  that bodies have better chance of being elaborated closer to the
1546
         --  specs. Pessimistic_Better_Choice as usual wants to do the opposite
1547
         --  and elaborate such specs as early as possible.
1548
 
1549
         --  If we have two units, one of which is a spec for which this flag
1550
         --  is set, and the other is not, we normally prefer to delay the spec
1551
         --  for which the flag is set, so again Pessimistic_Better_Choice does
1552
         --  the opposite.
1553
 
1554
         if not UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1555
           and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1556
         then
1557
            if Debug_Flag_B then
1558
               Write_Line ("  False: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
1559
            end if;
1560
 
1561
            return False;
1562
 
1563
         elsif not UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1564
           and then UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1565
         then
1566
            if Debug_Flag_B then
1567
               Write_Line ("  True: u1 is elab body desirable, u2 is not");
1568
            end if;
1569
 
1570
            return True;
1571
 
1572
            --  If we have two specs that are both marked as Elaborate_Body
1573
            --  desirable, we normally prefer the one whose body is nearer to
1574
            --  being able to be elaborated, based on the Num_Pred count. This
1575
            --  helps to ensure bodies are as close to specs as possible. As
1576
            --  usual, Pessimistic_Better_Choice does the opposite.
1577
 
1578
         elsif UT1.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1579
           and then UT2.Elaborate_Body_Desirable
1580
         then
1581
            declare
1582
               Result : constant Boolean :=
1583
                          UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U1)).Num_Pred >=
1584
                          UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U2)).Num_Pred;
1585
            begin
1586
               if Debug_Flag_B then
1587
                  if Result then
1588
                     Write_Line ("  True based on Num_Pred compare");
1589
                  else
1590
                     Write_Line ("  False based on Num_Pred compare");
1591
                  end if;
1592
               end if;
1593
 
1594
               return Result;
1595
            end;
1596
         end if;
1597
      end if;
1598
 
1599
      --  If we fall through, it means that no preference rule applies, so we
1600
      --  use alphabetical order to at least give a deterministic result. Since
1601
      --  Pessimistic_Better_Choice is in the business of stirring up the
1602
      --  order, we will use reverse alphabetical ordering.
1603
 
1604
      if Debug_Flag_B then
1605
         Write_Line ("  choose on reverse alpha order");
1606
      end if;
1607
 
1608
      return Uname_Less (UT2.Uname, UT1.Uname);
1609
   end Pessimistic_Better_Choice;
1610
 
1611
   ----------------
1612
   -- Unit_Id_Of --
1613
   ----------------
1614
 
1615
   function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id is
1616
      Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Uname);
1617
   begin
1618
      pragma Assert (Info /= 0 and then Unit_Id (Info) /= No_Unit_Id);
1619
      return Unit_Id (Info);
1620
   end Unit_Id_Of;
1621
 
1622
   ------------------------
1623
   -- Write_Dependencies --
1624
   ------------------------
1625
 
1626
   procedure Write_Dependencies is
1627
   begin
1628
      if not Zero_Formatting then
1629
         Write_Eol;
1630
         Write_Str ("                 ELABORATION ORDER DEPENDENCIES");
1631
         Write_Eol;
1632
         Write_Eol;
1633
      end if;
1634
 
1635
      Info_Prefix_Suppress := True;
1636
 
1637
      for S in Succ_First .. Succ.Last loop
1638
         Elab_Error_Msg (S);
1639
      end loop;
1640
 
1641
      Info_Prefix_Suppress := False;
1642
 
1643
      if not Zero_Formatting then
1644
         Write_Eol;
1645
      end if;
1646
   end Write_Dependencies;
1647
 
1648
   --------------------------
1649
   -- Write_Elab_All_Chain --
1650
   --------------------------
1651
 
1652
   procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id) is
1653
      ST     : constant Successor_Link := Succ.Table (S);
1654
      After  : constant Unit_Name_Type := Units.Table (ST.After).Uname;
1655
 
1656
      L   : Elab_All_Id;
1657
      Nam : Unit_Name_Type;
1658
 
1659
      First_Name : Boolean := True;
1660
 
1661
   begin
1662
      if ST.Reason in Elab_All .. Elab_All_Desirable then
1663
         L := ST.Elab_All_Link;
1664
         while L /= No_Elab_All_Link loop
1665
            Nam := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Needed_By;
1666
            Error_Msg_Unit_1 := Nam;
1667
            Error_Msg_Output ("        $", Info => True);
1668
 
1669
            Get_Name_String (Nam);
1670
 
1671
            if Name_Buffer (Name_Len) = 'b' then
1672
               if First_Name then
1673
                  Error_Msg_Output
1674
                    ("           must be elaborated along with its spec:",
1675
                     Info => True);
1676
 
1677
               else
1678
                  Error_Msg_Output
1679
                    ("           which must be elaborated " &
1680
                     "along with its spec:",
1681
                     Info => True);
1682
               end if;
1683
 
1684
            else
1685
               if First_Name then
1686
                  Error_Msg_Output
1687
                    ("           is withed by:",
1688
                     Info => True);
1689
 
1690
               else
1691
                  Error_Msg_Output
1692
                    ("           which is withed by:",
1693
                     Info => True);
1694
               end if;
1695
            end if;
1696
 
1697
            First_Name := False;
1698
 
1699
            L := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Next_Elab;
1700
         end loop;
1701
 
1702
         Error_Msg_Unit_1 := After;
1703
         Error_Msg_Output ("        $", Info => True);
1704
      end if;
1705
   end Write_Elab_All_Chain;
1706
 
1707
end Binde;

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.