1 |
706 |
jeremybenn |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 |
|
|
-- --
|
3 |
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
4 |
|
|
-- --
|
5 |
|
|
-- S E M --
|
6 |
|
|
-- --
|
7 |
|
|
-- S p e c --
|
8 |
|
|
-- --
|
9 |
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2011, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
10 |
|
|
-- --
|
11 |
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
12 |
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
13 |
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
14 |
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
15 |
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
16 |
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
17 |
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
18 |
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
19 |
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
20 |
|
|
-- --
|
21 |
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
22 |
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
23 |
|
|
-- --
|
24 |
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
27 |
|
|
-- Semantic Analysis: General Model --
|
28 |
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
-- Semantic processing involves 3 phases which are highly intertwined
|
31 |
|
|
-- (i.e. mutually recursive):
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
-- Analysis implements the bulk of semantic analysis such as
|
34 |
|
|
-- name analysis and type resolution for declarations,
|
35 |
|
|
-- instructions and expressions. The main routine
|
36 |
|
|
-- driving this process is procedure Analyze given below.
|
37 |
|
|
-- This analysis phase is really a bottom up pass that is
|
38 |
|
|
-- achieved during the recursive traversal performed by the
|
39 |
|
|
-- Analyze_... procedures implemented in the sem_* packages.
|
40 |
|
|
-- For expressions this phase determines unambiguous types
|
41 |
|
|
-- and collects sets of possible types where the
|
42 |
|
|
-- interpretation is potentially ambiguous.
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
-- Resolution is carried out only for expressions to finish type
|
45 |
|
|
-- resolution that was initiated but not necessarily
|
46 |
|
|
-- completed during analysis (because of overloading
|
47 |
|
|
-- ambiguities). Specifically, after completing the bottom
|
48 |
|
|
-- up pass carried out during analysis for expressions, the
|
49 |
|
|
-- Resolve routine (see the spec of sem_res for more info)
|
50 |
|
|
-- is called to perform a top down resolution with
|
51 |
|
|
-- recursive calls to itself to resolve operands.
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
-- Expansion if we are not generating code this phase is a no-op.
|
54 |
|
|
-- otherwise this phase expands, i.e. transforms, original
|
55 |
|
|
-- declaration, expressions or instructions into simpler
|
56 |
|
|
-- structures that can be handled by the back-end. This
|
57 |
|
|
-- phase is also in charge of generating code which is
|
58 |
|
|
-- implicit in the original source (for instance for
|
59 |
|
|
-- default initializations, controlled types, etc.)
|
60 |
|
|
-- There are two separate instances where expansion is
|
61 |
|
|
-- invoked. For declarations and instructions, expansion is
|
62 |
|
|
-- invoked just after analysis since no resolution needs
|
63 |
|
|
-- to be performed. For expressions, expansion is done just
|
64 |
|
|
-- after resolution. In both cases expansion is done from the
|
65 |
|
|
-- bottom up just before the end of Analyze for instructions
|
66 |
|
|
-- and declarations or the call to Resolve for expressions.
|
67 |
|
|
-- The main routine driving expansion is Expand.
|
68 |
|
|
-- See the spec of Expander for more details.
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
-- To summarize, in normal code generation mode we recursively traverse the
|
71 |
|
|
-- abstract syntax tree top-down performing semantic analysis bottom
|
72 |
|
|
-- up. For instructions and declarations, before the call to the Analyze
|
73 |
|
|
-- routine completes we perform expansion since at that point we have all
|
74 |
|
|
-- semantic information needed. For expression nodes, after the call to
|
75 |
|
|
-- Analysis terminates we invoke the Resolve routine to transmit top-down
|
76 |
|
|
-- the type that was gathered by Analyze which will resolve possible
|
77 |
|
|
-- ambiguities in the expression. Just before the call to Resolve
|
78 |
|
|
-- terminates, the expression can be expanded since all the semantic
|
79 |
|
|
-- information is available at that point.
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
-- If we are not generating code then the expansion phase is a no-op
|
82 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
-- When generating code there are a number of exceptions to the basic
|
84 |
|
|
-- Analysis-Resolution-Expansion model for expressions. The most prominent
|
85 |
|
|
-- examples are the handling of default expressions and aggregates.
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
88 |
|
|
-- Handling of Default and Per-Object Expressions (Spec-Expressions) --
|
89 |
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
-- The default expressions in component declarations and in procedure
|
92 |
|
|
-- specifications (but not the ones in object declarations) are quite tricky
|
93 |
|
|
-- to handle. The problem is that some processing is required at the point
|
94 |
|
|
-- where the expression appears:
|
95 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
-- visibility analysis (including user defined operators)
|
97 |
|
|
-- freezing of static expressions
|
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
-- but other processing must be deferred until the enclosing entity (record or
|
100 |
|
|
-- procedure specification) is frozen:
|
101 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
-- freezing of any other types in the expression expansion
|
103 |
|
|
-- generation of code
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
-- A similar situation occurs with the argument of priority and interrupt
|
106 |
|
|
-- priority pragmas that appear in task and protected definition specs and
|
107 |
|
|
-- other cases of per-object expressions (see RM 3.8(18)).
|
108 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
-- Another similar case is the conditions in precondition and postcondition
|
110 |
|
|
-- pragmas that appear with subprogram specifications rather than in the body.
|
111 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
-- Collectively we call these Spec_Expressions. The routine that performs the
|
113 |
|
|
-- special analysis is called Analyze_Spec_Expression.
|
114 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
-- Expansion has to be deferred since you can't generate code for expressions
|
116 |
|
|
-- that reference types that have not been frozen yet. As an example, consider
|
117 |
|
|
-- the following:
|
118 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
-- type x is delta 0.5 range -10.0 .. +10.0;
|
120 |
|
|
-- ...
|
121 |
|
|
-- type q is record
|
122 |
|
|
-- xx : x := y * z;
|
123 |
|
|
-- end record;
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
-- for x'small use 0.25
|
126 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
-- The expander is in charge of dealing with fixed-point, and of course the
|
128 |
|
|
-- small declaration, which is not too late, since the declaration of type q
|
129 |
|
|
-- does *not* freeze type x, definitely affects the expanded code.
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
-- Another reason that we cannot expand early is that expansion can generate
|
132 |
|
|
-- range checks. These range checks need to be inserted not at the point of
|
133 |
|
|
-- definition but at the point of use. The whole point here is that the value
|
134 |
|
|
-- of the expression cannot be obtained at the point of declaration, only at
|
135 |
|
|
-- the point of use.
|
136 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
-- Generally our model is to combine analysis resolution and expansion, but
|
138 |
|
|
-- this is the one case where this model falls down. Here is how we patch
|
139 |
|
|
-- it up without causing too much distortion to our basic model.
|
140 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
-- A switch (In_Spec_Expression) is set to show that we are in the initial
|
142 |
|
|
-- occurrence of a default expression. The analyzer is then called on this
|
143 |
|
|
-- expression with the switch set true. Analysis and resolution proceed almost
|
144 |
|
|
-- as usual, except that Freeze_Expression will not freeze non-static
|
145 |
|
|
-- expressions if this switch is set, and the call to Expand at the end of
|
146 |
|
|
-- resolution is skipped. This also skips the code that normally sets the
|
147 |
|
|
-- Analyzed flag to True. The result is that when we are done the tree is
|
148 |
|
|
-- still marked as unanalyzed, but all types for static expressions are frozen
|
149 |
|
|
-- as required, and all entities of variables have been recorded. We then turn
|
150 |
|
|
-- off the switch, and later on reanalyze the expression with the switch off.
|
151 |
|
|
-- The effect is that this second analysis freezes the rest of the types as
|
152 |
|
|
-- required, and generates code but visibility analysis is not repeated since
|
153 |
|
|
-- all the entities are marked.
|
154 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
-- The second analysis (the one that generates code) is in the context
|
156 |
|
|
-- where the code is required. For a record field default, this is in the
|
157 |
|
|
-- initialization procedure for the record and for a subprogram default
|
158 |
|
|
-- parameter, it is at the point the subprogram is frozen. For a priority or
|
159 |
|
|
-- storage size pragma it is in the context of the Init_Proc for the task or
|
160 |
|
|
-- protected object. For a pre/postcondition pragma it is in the body when
|
161 |
|
|
-- code for the pragma is generated.
|
162 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
------------------
|
164 |
|
|
-- Pre-Analysis --
|
165 |
|
|
------------------
|
166 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
-- For certain kind of expressions, such as aggregates, we need to defer
|
168 |
|
|
-- expansion of the aggregate and its inner expressions after the whole
|
169 |
|
|
-- set of expressions appearing inside the aggregate have been analyzed.
|
170 |
|
|
-- Consider, for instance the following example:
|
171 |
|
|
--
|
172 |
|
|
-- (1 .. 100 => new Thing (Function_Call))
|
173 |
|
|
--
|
174 |
|
|
-- The normal Analysis-Resolution-Expansion mechanism where expansion of the
|
175 |
|
|
-- children is performed before expansion of the parent does not work if the
|
176 |
|
|
-- code generated for the children by the expander needs to be evaluated
|
177 |
|
|
-- repeatedly (for instance in the above aggregate "new Thing (Function_Call)"
|
178 |
|
|
-- needs to be called 100 times.)
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
-- The reason why this mechanism does not work is that, the expanded code for
|
181 |
|
|
-- the children is typically inserted above the parent and thus when the
|
182 |
|
|
-- father gets expanded no re-evaluation takes place. For instance in the case
|
183 |
|
|
-- of aggregates if "new Thing (Function_Call)" is expanded before of the
|
184 |
|
|
-- aggregate the expanded code will be placed outside of the aggregate and
|
185 |
|
|
-- when expanding the aggregate the loop from 1 to 100 will not surround the
|
186 |
|
|
-- expanded code for "new Thing (Function_Call)".
|
187 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
-- To remedy this situation we introduce a new flag which signals whether we
|
189 |
|
|
-- want a full analysis (i.e. expansion is enabled) or a pre-analysis which
|
190 |
|
|
-- performs Analysis and Resolution but no expansion.
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
-- After the complete pre-analysis of an expression has been carried out we
|
193 |
|
|
-- can transform the expression and then carry out the full three stage
|
194 |
|
|
-- (Analyze-Resolve-Expand) cycle on the transformed expression top-down so
|
195 |
|
|
-- that the expansion of inner expressions happens inside the newly generated
|
196 |
|
|
-- node for the parent expression.
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
-- Note that the difference between processing of default expressions and
|
199 |
|
|
-- pre-analysis of other expressions is that we do carry out freezing in
|
200 |
|
|
-- the latter but not in the former (except for static scalar expressions).
|
201 |
|
|
-- The routine that performs preanalysis and corresponding resolution is
|
202 |
|
|
-- called Preanalyze_And_Resolve and is in Sem_Res.
|
203 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
with Alloc;
|
205 |
|
|
with Einfo; use Einfo;
|
206 |
|
|
with Opt; use Opt;
|
207 |
|
|
with Table;
|
208 |
|
|
with Types; use Types;
|
209 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
package Sem is
|
211 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
New_Nodes_OK : Int := 1;
|
213 |
|
|
-- Temporary flag for use in checking out HLO. Set non-zero if it is
|
214 |
|
|
-- OK to generate new nodes.
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
217 |
|
|
-- Semantic Analysis Flags --
|
218 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
219 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
Full_Analysis : Boolean := True;
|
221 |
|
|
-- Switch to indicate if we are doing a full analysis or a pre-analysis.
|
222 |
|
|
-- In normal analysis mode (Analysis-Expansion for instructions or
|
223 |
|
|
-- declarations) or (Analysis-Resolution-Expansion for expressions) this
|
224 |
|
|
-- flag is set. Note that if we are not generating code the expansion phase
|
225 |
|
|
-- merely sets the Analyzed flag to True in this case. If we are in
|
226 |
|
|
-- Pre-Analysis mode (see above) this flag is set to False then the
|
227 |
|
|
-- expansion phase is skipped.
|
228 |
|
|
--
|
229 |
|
|
-- When this flag is False the flag Expander_Active is also False (the
|
230 |
|
|
-- Expander_Active flag defined in the spec of package Expander tells you
|
231 |
|
|
-- whether expansion is currently enabled). You should really regard this
|
232 |
|
|
-- as a read only flag.
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
In_Spec_Expression : Boolean := False;
|
235 |
|
|
-- Switch to indicate that we are in a spec-expression, as described
|
236 |
|
|
-- above. Note that this must be recursively saved on a Semantics call
|
237 |
|
|
-- since it is possible for the analysis of an expression to result in a
|
238 |
|
|
-- recursive call (e.g. to get the entity for System.Address as part of the
|
239 |
|
|
-- processing of an Address attribute reference). When this switch is True
|
240 |
|
|
-- then Full_Analysis above must be False. You should really regard this as
|
241 |
|
|
-- a read only flag.
|
242 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
In_Deleted_Code : Boolean := False;
|
244 |
|
|
-- If the condition in an if-statement is statically known, the branch
|
245 |
|
|
-- that is not taken is analyzed with expansion disabled, and the tree
|
246 |
|
|
-- is deleted after analysis. Itypes generated in deleted code must be
|
247 |
|
|
-- frozen from start, because the tree on which they depend will not
|
248 |
|
|
-- be available at the freeze point.
|
249 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
In_Inlined_Body : Boolean := False;
|
251 |
|
|
-- Switch to indicate that we are analyzing and resolving an inlined body.
|
252 |
|
|
-- Type checking is disabled in this context, because types are known to be
|
253 |
|
|
-- compatible. This avoids problems with private types whose full view is
|
254 |
|
|
-- derived from private types.
|
255 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
Inside_A_Generic : Boolean := False;
|
257 |
|
|
-- This flag is set if we are processing a generic specification, generic
|
258 |
|
|
-- definition, or generic body. When this flag is True the Expander_Active
|
259 |
|
|
-- flag is False to disable any code expansion (see package Expander). Only
|
260 |
|
|
-- the generic processing can modify the status of this flag, any other
|
261 |
|
|
-- client should regard it as read-only.
|
262 |
|
|
-- Probably should be called Inside_A_Generic_Template ???
|
263 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
Inside_Freezing_Actions : Nat := 0;
|
265 |
|
|
-- Flag indicating whether we are within a call to Expand_N_Freeze_Actions.
|
266 |
|
|
-- Non-zero means we are inside (it is actually a level counter to deal
|
267 |
|
|
-- with nested calls). Used to avoid traversing the tree each time a
|
268 |
|
|
-- subprogram call is processed to know if we must not clear all constant
|
269 |
|
|
-- indications from entities in the current scope. Only the expansion of
|
270 |
|
|
-- freezing nodes can modify the status of this flag, any other client
|
271 |
|
|
-- should regard it as read-only.
|
272 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
Unloaded_Subunits : Boolean := False;
|
274 |
|
|
-- This flag is set True if we have subunits that are not loaded. This
|
275 |
|
|
-- occurs when the main unit is a subunit, and contains lower level
|
276 |
|
|
-- subunits that are not loaded. We use this flag to suppress warnings
|
277 |
|
|
-- about unused variables, since these warnings are unreliable in this
|
278 |
|
|
-- case. We could perhaps do a more accurate job and retain some of the
|
279 |
|
|
-- warnings, but it is quite a tricky job.
|
280 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
282 |
|
|
-- Handling of Check Suppression --
|
283 |
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
284 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
-- There are two kinds of suppress checks: scope based suppress checks,
|
286 |
|
|
-- and entity based suppress checks.
|
287 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
-- Scope based suppress checks for the predefined checks (from initial
|
289 |
|
|
-- command line arguments, or from Suppress pragmas not including an entity
|
290 |
|
|
-- entity name) are recorded in the Sem.Suppress variable, and all that is
|
291 |
|
|
-- necessary is to save the state of this variable on scope entry, and
|
292 |
|
|
-- restore it on scope exit. This mechanism allows for fast checking of
|
293 |
|
|
-- the scope suppress state without needing complex data structures.
|
294 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
-- Entity based checks, from Suppress/Unsuppress pragmas giving an
|
296 |
|
|
-- Entity_Id and scope based checks for non-predefined checks (introduced
|
297 |
|
|
-- using pragma Check_Name), are handled as follows. If a suppress or
|
298 |
|
|
-- unsuppress pragma is encountered for a given entity, then the flag
|
299 |
|
|
-- Checks_May_Be_Suppressed is set in the entity and an entry is made in
|
300 |
|
|
-- either the Local_Entity_Suppress stack (case of pragma that appears in
|
301 |
|
|
-- other than a package spec), or in the Global_Entity_Suppress stack (case
|
302 |
|
|
-- of pragma that appears in a package spec, which is by the rule of RM
|
303 |
|
|
-- 11.5(7) applicable throughout the life of the entity). Similarly, a
|
304 |
|
|
-- Suppress/Unsuppress pragma for a non-predefined check which does not
|
305 |
|
|
-- specify an entity is also stored in one of these stacks.
|
306 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
-- If the Checks_May_Be_Suppressed flag is set in an entity then the
|
308 |
|
|
-- procedure is to search first the local and then the global suppress
|
309 |
|
|
-- stacks (we search these in reverse order, top element first). The only
|
310 |
|
|
-- other point is that we have to make sure that we have proper nested
|
311 |
|
|
-- interaction between such specific pragmas and locally applied general
|
312 |
|
|
-- pragmas applying to all entities. This is achieved by including in the
|
313 |
|
|
-- Local_Entity_Suppress table dummy entries with an empty Entity field
|
314 |
|
|
-- that are applicable to all entities. A similar search is needed for any
|
315 |
|
|
-- non-predefined check even if no specific entity is involved.
|
316 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
Scope_Suppress : Suppress_Array := Suppress_Options;
|
318 |
|
|
-- This array contains the current scope based settings of the suppress
|
319 |
|
|
-- switches. It is initialized from the options as shown, and then modified
|
320 |
|
|
-- by pragma Suppress. On entry to each scope, the current setting is saved
|
321 |
|
|
-- the scope stack, and then restored on exit from the scope. This record
|
322 |
|
|
-- may be rapidly checked to determine the current status of a check if
|
323 |
|
|
-- no specific entity is involved or if the specific entity involved is
|
324 |
|
|
-- one for which no specific Suppress/Unsuppress pragma has been set (as
|
325 |
|
|
-- indicated by the Checks_May_Be_Suppressed flag being set).
|
326 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
-- This scheme is a little complex, but serves the purpose of enabling
|
328 |
|
|
-- a very rapid check in the common case where no entity specific pragma
|
329 |
|
|
-- applies, and gives the right result when such pragmas are used even
|
330 |
|
|
-- in complex cases of nested Suppress and Unsuppress pragmas.
|
331 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
-- The Local_Entity_Suppress and Global_Entity_Suppress stacks are handled
|
333 |
|
|
-- using dynamic allocation and linked lists. We do not often use this
|
334 |
|
|
-- approach in the compiler (preferring to use extensible tables instead).
|
335 |
|
|
-- The reason we do it here is that scope stack entries save a pointer to
|
336 |
|
|
-- the current local stack top, which is also saved and restored on scope
|
337 |
|
|
-- exit. Furthermore for processing of generics we save pointers to the
|
338 |
|
|
-- top of the stack, so that the local stack is actually a tree of stacks
|
339 |
|
|
-- rather than a single stack, a structure that is easy to represent using
|
340 |
|
|
-- linked lists, but impossible to represent using a single table. Note
|
341 |
|
|
-- that because of the generic issue, we never release entries in these
|
342 |
|
|
-- stacks, but that's no big deal, since we are unlikely to have a huge
|
343 |
|
|
-- number of Suppress/Unsuppress entries in a single compilation.
|
344 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
type Suppress_Stack_Entry;
|
346 |
|
|
type Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr is access all Suppress_Stack_Entry;
|
347 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
type Suppress_Stack_Entry is record
|
349 |
|
|
Entity : Entity_Id;
|
350 |
|
|
-- Entity to which the check applies, or Empty for a check that has
|
351 |
|
|
-- no entity name (and thus applies to all entities).
|
352 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
Check : Check_Id;
|
354 |
|
|
-- Check which is set (can be All_Checks for the All_Checks case)
|
355 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
Suppress : Boolean;
|
357 |
|
|
-- Set True for Suppress, and False for Unsuppress
|
358 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
Prev : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr;
|
360 |
|
|
-- Pointer to previous entry on stack
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
Next : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr;
|
363 |
|
|
-- All allocated Suppress_Stack_Entry records are chained together in
|
364 |
|
|
-- a linked list whose head is Suppress_Stack_Entries, and the Next
|
365 |
|
|
-- field is used as a forward pointer (null ends the list). This is
|
366 |
|
|
-- used to free all entries in Sem.Init (which will be important if
|
367 |
|
|
-- we ever setup the compiler to be reused).
|
368 |
|
|
end record;
|
369 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
Suppress_Stack_Entries : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr := null;
|
371 |
|
|
-- Pointer to linked list of records (see comments for Next above)
|
372 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
Local_Suppress_Stack_Top : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr;
|
374 |
|
|
-- Pointer to top element of local suppress stack. This is the entry that
|
375 |
|
|
-- is saved and restored in the scope stack, and also saved for generic
|
376 |
|
|
-- body expansion.
|
377 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
Global_Suppress_Stack_Top : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr;
|
379 |
|
|
-- Pointer to top element of global suppress stack
|
380 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
procedure Push_Local_Suppress_Stack_Entry
|
382 |
|
|
(Entity : Entity_Id;
|
383 |
|
|
Check : Check_Id;
|
384 |
|
|
Suppress : Boolean);
|
385 |
|
|
-- Push a new entry on to the top of the local suppress stack, updating
|
386 |
|
|
-- the value in Local_Suppress_Stack_Top;
|
387 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
procedure Push_Global_Suppress_Stack_Entry
|
389 |
|
|
(Entity : Entity_Id;
|
390 |
|
|
Check : Check_Id;
|
391 |
|
|
Suppress : Boolean);
|
392 |
|
|
-- Push a new entry on to the top of the global suppress stack, updating
|
393 |
|
|
-- the value in Global_Suppress_Stack_Top;
|
394 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
-----------------
|
396 |
|
|
-- Scope Stack --
|
397 |
|
|
-----------------
|
398 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
-- The scope stack indicates the declarative regions that are currently
|
400 |
|
|
-- being processed (analyzed and/or expanded). The scope stack is one of
|
401 |
|
|
-- the basic visibility structures in the compiler: entities that are
|
402 |
|
|
-- declared in a scope that is currently on the scope stack are immediately
|
403 |
|
|
-- visible (leaving aside issues of hiding and overloading).
|
404 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
-- Initially, the scope stack only contains an entry for package Standard.
|
406 |
|
|
-- When a compilation unit, subprogram unit, block or declarative region
|
407 |
|
|
-- is being processed, the corresponding entity is pushed on the scope
|
408 |
|
|
-- stack. It is removed after the processing step is completed. A given
|
409 |
|
|
-- entity can be placed several times on the scope stack, for example
|
410 |
|
|
-- when processing derived type declarations, freeze nodes, etc. The top
|
411 |
|
|
-- of the scope stack is the innermost scope currently being processed.
|
412 |
|
|
-- It is obtained through function Current_Scope. After a compilation unit
|
413 |
|
|
-- has been processed, the scope stack must contain only Standard.
|
414 |
|
|
-- The predicate In_Open_Scopes specifies whether a scope is currently
|
415 |
|
|
-- on the scope stack.
|
416 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
-- This model is complicated by the need to compile units on the fly, in
|
418 |
|
|
-- the middle of the compilation of other units. This arises when compiling
|
419 |
|
|
-- instantiations, and when compiling run-time packages obtained through
|
420 |
|
|
-- rtsfind. Given that the scope stack is a single static and global
|
421 |
|
|
-- structure (not originally designed for the recursive processing required
|
422 |
|
|
-- by rtsfind for example) additional machinery is needed to indicate what
|
423 |
|
|
-- is currently being compiled. As a result, the scope stack holds several
|
424 |
|
|
-- contiguous sections that correspond to the compilation of a given
|
425 |
|
|
-- compilation unit. These sections are separated by distinct occurrences
|
426 |
|
|
-- of package Standard. The currently active section of the scope stack
|
427 |
|
|
-- goes from the current scope to the first (innermost) occurrence of
|
428 |
|
|
-- Standard, which is additionally marked with the flag
|
429 |
|
|
-- Is_Active_Stack_Base. The basic visibility routine (Find_Direct_Name, in
|
430 |
|
|
-- Sem_Ch8) uses this contiguous section of the scope stack to determine
|
431 |
|
|
-- whether a given entity is or is not visible at a point. In_Open_Scopes
|
432 |
|
|
-- only examines the currently active section of the scope stack.
|
433 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
-- Similar complications arise when processing child instances. These
|
435 |
|
|
-- must be compiled in the context of parent instances, and therefore the
|
436 |
|
|
-- parents must be pushed on the stack before compiling the child, and
|
437 |
|
|
-- removed afterwards. Routines Save_Scope_Stack and Restore_Scope_Stack
|
438 |
|
|
-- are used to set/reset the visibility of entities declared in scopes
|
439 |
|
|
-- that are currently on the scope stack, and are used when compiling
|
440 |
|
|
-- instance bodies on the fly.
|
441 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
-- It is clear in retrospect that all semantic processing and visibility
|
443 |
|
|
-- structures should have been fully recursive. The rtsfind mechanism,
|
444 |
|
|
-- and the complexities brought about by subunits and by generic child
|
445 |
|
|
-- units and their instantiations, have led to a hybrid model that carries
|
446 |
|
|
-- more state than one would wish.
|
447 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
type Scope_Stack_Entry is record
|
449 |
|
|
Entity : Entity_Id;
|
450 |
|
|
-- Entity representing the scope
|
451 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
Last_Subprogram_Name : String_Ptr;
|
453 |
|
|
-- Pointer to name of last subprogram body in this scope. Used for
|
454 |
|
|
-- testing proper alpha ordering of subprogram bodies in scope.
|
455 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
Save_Scope_Suppress : Suppress_Array;
|
457 |
|
|
-- Save contents of Scope_Suppress on entry
|
458 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
Save_Local_Suppress_Stack_Top : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr;
|
460 |
|
|
-- Save contents of Local_Suppress_Stack on entry to restore on exit
|
461 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
Save_Check_Policy_List : Node_Id;
|
463 |
|
|
-- Save contents of Check_Policy_List on entry to restore on exit
|
464 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
Save_Default_Storage_Pool : Node_Id;
|
466 |
|
|
-- Save contents of Default_Storage_Pool on entry to restore on exit
|
467 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
Is_Transient : Boolean;
|
469 |
|
|
-- Marks transient scopes (see Exp_Ch7 body for details)
|
470 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
Previous_Visibility : Boolean;
|
472 |
|
|
-- Used when installing the parent(s) of the current compilation unit.
|
473 |
|
|
-- The parent may already be visible because of an ongoing compilation,
|
474 |
|
|
-- and the proper visibility must be restored on exit. The flag is
|
475 |
|
|
-- typically needed when the context of a child unit requires
|
476 |
|
|
-- compilation of a sibling. In other cases the flag is set to False.
|
477 |
|
|
-- See Sem_Ch10 (Install_Parents, Remove_Parents).
|
478 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
Node_To_Be_Wrapped : Node_Id;
|
480 |
|
|
-- Only used in transient scopes. Records the node which will
|
481 |
|
|
-- be wrapped by the transient block.
|
482 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
Actions_To_Be_Wrapped_Before : List_Id;
|
484 |
|
|
Actions_To_Be_Wrapped_After : List_Id;
|
485 |
|
|
-- Actions that have to be inserted at the start or at the end of a
|
486 |
|
|
-- transient block. Used to temporarily hold these actions until the
|
487 |
|
|
-- block is created, at which time the actions are moved to the block.
|
488 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
Pending_Freeze_Actions : List_Id;
|
490 |
|
|
-- Used to collect freeze entity nodes and associated actions that are
|
491 |
|
|
-- generated in an inner context but need to be analyzed outside, such
|
492 |
|
|
-- as records and initialization procedures. On exit from the scope,
|
493 |
|
|
-- this list of actions is inserted before the scope construct and
|
494 |
|
|
-- analyzed to generate the corresponding freeze processing and
|
495 |
|
|
-- elaboration of other associated actions.
|
496 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
First_Use_Clause : Node_Id;
|
498 |
|
|
-- Head of list of Use_Clauses in current scope. The list is built when
|
499 |
|
|
-- the declarations in the scope are processed. The list is traversed
|
500 |
|
|
-- on scope exit to undo the effect of the use clauses.
|
501 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
Component_Alignment_Default : Component_Alignment_Kind;
|
503 |
|
|
-- Component alignment to be applied to any record or array types that
|
504 |
|
|
-- are declared for which a specific component alignment pragma does not
|
505 |
|
|
-- set the alignment.
|
506 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
Is_Active_Stack_Base : Boolean;
|
508 |
|
|
-- Set to true only when entering the scope for Standard_Standard from
|
509 |
|
|
-- from within procedure Semantics. Indicates the base of the current
|
510 |
|
|
-- active set of scopes. Needed by In_Open_Scopes to handle cases where
|
511 |
|
|
-- Standard_Standard can be pushed anew on the scope stack to start a
|
512 |
|
|
-- new active section (see comment above).
|
513 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
end record;
|
515 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
package Scope_Stack is new Table.Table (
|
517 |
|
|
Table_Component_Type => Scope_Stack_Entry,
|
518 |
|
|
Table_Index_Type => Int,
|
519 |
|
|
Table_Low_Bound => 0,
|
520 |
|
|
Table_Initial => Alloc.Scope_Stack_Initial,
|
521 |
|
|
Table_Increment => Alloc.Scope_Stack_Increment,
|
522 |
|
|
Table_Name => "Sem.Scope_Stack");
|
523 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
-----------------
|
525 |
|
|
-- Subprograms --
|
526 |
|
|
-----------------
|
527 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
procedure Initialize;
|
529 |
|
|
-- Initialize internal tables
|
530 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
procedure Lock;
|
532 |
|
|
-- Lock internal tables before calling back end
|
533 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
procedure Semantics (Comp_Unit : Node_Id);
|
535 |
|
|
-- This procedure is called to perform semantic analysis on the specified
|
536 |
|
|
-- node which is the N_Compilation_Unit node for the unit.
|
537 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id);
|
539 |
|
|
procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
540 |
|
|
-- This is the recursive procedure that is applied to individual nodes of
|
541 |
|
|
-- the tree, starting at the top level node (compilation unit node) and
|
542 |
|
|
-- then moving down the tree in a top down traversal. It calls individual
|
543 |
|
|
-- routines with names Analyze_xxx to analyze node xxx. Each of these
|
544 |
|
|
-- routines is responsible for calling Analyze on the components of the
|
545 |
|
|
-- subtree.
|
546 |
|
|
--
|
547 |
|
|
-- Note: In the case of expression components (nodes whose Nkind is in
|
548 |
|
|
-- N_Subexpr), the call to Analyze does not complete the semantic analysis
|
549 |
|
|
-- of the node, since the type resolution cannot be completed until the
|
550 |
|
|
-- complete context is analyzed. The completion of the type analysis occurs
|
551 |
|
|
-- in the corresponding Resolve routine (see Sem_Res).
|
552 |
|
|
--
|
553 |
|
|
-- Note: for integer and real literals, the analyzer sets the flag to
|
554 |
|
|
-- indicate that the result is a static expression. If the expander
|
555 |
|
|
-- generates a literal that does NOT correspond to a static expression,
|
556 |
|
|
-- e.g. by folding an expression whose value is known at compile-time,
|
557 |
|
|
-- but is not technically static, then the caller should reset the
|
558 |
|
|
-- Is_Static_Expression flag after analyzing but before resolving.
|
559 |
|
|
--
|
560 |
|
|
-- If the Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done
|
561 |
|
|
-- with the specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress
|
562 |
|
|
-- all checks).
|
563 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id);
|
565 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
566 |
|
|
-- Analyzes each element of a list. If the Suppress argument is present,
|
567 |
|
|
-- then the analysis is done with the specified check suppressed (can
|
568 |
|
|
-- be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
569 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
procedure Copy_Suppress_Status
|
571 |
|
|
(C : Check_Id;
|
572 |
|
|
From : Entity_Id;
|
573 |
|
|
To : Entity_Id);
|
574 |
|
|
-- If From is an entity for which check C is explicitly suppressed
|
575 |
|
|
-- then also explicitly suppress the corresponding check in To.
|
576 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze
|
578 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; L : List_Id);
|
579 |
|
|
procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze
|
580 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
581 |
|
|
-- Inserts list L after node N using Nlists.Insert_List_After, and then,
|
582 |
|
|
-- after this insertion is complete, analyzes all the nodes in the list,
|
583 |
|
|
-- including any additional nodes generated by this analysis. If the list
|
584 |
|
|
-- is empty or No_List, the call has no effect. If the Suppress argument is
|
585 |
|
|
-- present, then the analysis is done with the specified check suppressed
|
586 |
|
|
-- (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
587 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze
|
589 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; L : List_Id);
|
590 |
|
|
procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze
|
591 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
592 |
|
|
-- Inserts list L before node N using Nlists.Insert_List_Before, and then,
|
593 |
|
|
-- after this insertion is complete, analyzes all the nodes in the list,
|
594 |
|
|
-- including any additional nodes generated by this analysis. If the list
|
595 |
|
|
-- is empty or No_List, the call has no effect. If the Suppress argument is
|
596 |
|
|
-- present, then the analysis is done with the specified check suppressed
|
597 |
|
|
-- (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
598 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze
|
600 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id);
|
601 |
|
|
procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze
|
602 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
603 |
|
|
-- Inserts node M after node N and then after the insertion is complete,
|
604 |
|
|
-- analyzes the inserted node and all nodes that are generated by
|
605 |
|
|
-- this analysis. If the node is empty, the call has no effect. If the
|
606 |
|
|
-- Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done with the
|
607 |
|
|
-- specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
608 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze
|
610 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id);
|
611 |
|
|
procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze
|
612 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
613 |
|
|
-- Inserts node M before node N and then after the insertion is complete,
|
614 |
|
|
-- analyzes the inserted node and all nodes that could be generated by
|
615 |
|
|
-- this analysis. If the node is empty, the call has no effect. If the
|
616 |
|
|
-- Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done with the
|
617 |
|
|
-- specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
618 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
function External_Ref_In_Generic (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
620 |
|
|
-- Return True if we are in the context of a generic and E is
|
621 |
|
|
-- external (more global) to it.
|
622 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
procedure Enter_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id);
|
624 |
|
|
-- Shall be called each time a Generic subprogram or package scope is
|
625 |
|
|
-- entered. S is the entity of the scope.
|
626 |
|
|
-- ??? At the moment, only called for package specs because this mechanism
|
627 |
|
|
-- is only used for avoiding freezing of external references in generics
|
628 |
|
|
-- and this can only be an issue if the outer generic scope is a package
|
629 |
|
|
-- spec (otherwise all external entities are already frozen)
|
630 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
procedure Exit_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id);
|
632 |
|
|
-- Shall be called each time a Generic subprogram or package scope is
|
633 |
|
|
-- exited. S is the entity of the scope.
|
634 |
|
|
-- ??? At the moment, only called for package specs exit.
|
635 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
function Explicit_Suppress (E : Entity_Id; C : Check_Id) return Boolean;
|
637 |
|
|
-- This function returns True if an explicit pragma Suppress for check C
|
638 |
|
|
-- is present in the package defining E.
|
639 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
function Is_Check_Suppressed (E : Entity_Id; C : Check_Id) return Boolean;
|
641 |
|
|
-- This function is called if Checks_May_Be_Suppressed (E) is True to
|
642 |
|
|
-- determine whether check C is suppressed either on the entity E or
|
643 |
|
|
-- as the result of a scope suppress pragma. If Checks_May_Be_Suppressed
|
644 |
|
|
-- is False, then the status of the check can be determined simply by
|
645 |
|
|
-- examining Scope_Checks (C), so this routine is not called in that case.
|
646 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
generic
|
648 |
|
|
with procedure Action (Item : Node_Id);
|
649 |
|
|
procedure Walk_Library_Items;
|
650 |
|
|
-- Primarily for use by SofCheck Inspector. Must be called after semantic
|
651 |
|
|
-- analysis (and expansion) are complete. Walks each relevant library item,
|
652 |
|
|
-- calling Action for each, in an order such that one will not run across
|
653 |
|
|
-- forward references. Each Item passed to Action is the declaration or
|
654 |
|
|
-- body of a library unit, including generics and renamings. The first item
|
655 |
|
|
-- is the N_Package_Declaration node for package Standard. Bodies are not
|
656 |
|
|
-- included, except for the main unit itself, which always comes last.
|
657 |
|
|
--
|
658 |
|
|
-- Item is never a subunit
|
659 |
|
|
--
|
660 |
|
|
-- Item is never an instantiation. Instead, the instance declaration is
|
661 |
|
|
-- passed, and (if the instantiation is the main unit), the instance body.
|
662 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
-- Debugging:
|
664 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
function ss (Index : Int) return Scope_Stack_Entry;
|
666 |
|
|
pragma Export (Ada, ss);
|
667 |
|
|
-- "ss" = "scope stack"; returns the Index'th entry in the Scope_Stack
|
668 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
function sst return Scope_Stack_Entry;
|
670 |
|
|
pragma Export (Ada, sst);
|
671 |
|
|
-- "sst" = "scope stack top"; same as ss(Scope_Stack.Last)
|
672 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
end Sem;
|