1 |
706 |
jeremybenn |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 |
|
|
-- --
|
3 |
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
4 |
|
|
-- --
|
5 |
|
|
-- S E M _ E L A B --
|
6 |
|
|
-- --
|
7 |
|
|
-- S p e c --
|
8 |
|
|
-- --
|
9 |
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1997-2011, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
10 |
|
|
-- --
|
11 |
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
12 |
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
13 |
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
14 |
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
15 |
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
16 |
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
17 |
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
18 |
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
19 |
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
20 |
|
|
-- --
|
21 |
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
22 |
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
23 |
|
|
-- --
|
24 |
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
-- This package contains the routines used to deal with issuing warnings
|
27 |
|
|
-- for cases of calls that may require warnings about possible access
|
28 |
|
|
-- before elaboration.
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
with Types; use Types;
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
package Sem_Elab is
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
35 |
|
|
-- Description of Approach --
|
36 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
-- Every non-static call that is encountered by Sem_Res results in
|
39 |
|
|
-- a call to Check_Elab_Call, with N being the call node, and Outer
|
40 |
|
|
-- set to its default value of True.
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
-- The goal of Check_Elab_Call is to determine whether or not the
|
43 |
|
|
-- call in question can generate an access before elaboration
|
44 |
|
|
-- error (raising Program_Error) either by directly calling a
|
45 |
|
|
-- subprogram whose body has not yet been elaborated, or indirectly,
|
46 |
|
|
-- by calling a subprogram whose body has been elaborated, but which
|
47 |
|
|
-- contains a call to such a subprogram.
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
-- The only calls that we need to look at at the outer level are
|
50 |
|
|
-- calls that occur in elaboration code. There are two cases. The
|
51 |
|
|
-- call can be at the outer level of elaboration code, or it can
|
52 |
|
|
-- be within another unit, e.g. the elaboration code of a subprogram.
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
-- In the case of an elaboration call at the outer level, we must
|
55 |
|
|
-- trace all calls to outer level routines either within the current
|
56 |
|
|
-- unit or to other units that are with'ed. For calls within the
|
57 |
|
|
-- current unit, we can determine if the body has been elaborated
|
58 |
|
|
-- or not, and if it has not, then a warning is generated.
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
-- Note that there are two subcases. If the original call directly
|
61 |
|
|
-- calls a subprogram whose body has not been elaborated, then we
|
62 |
|
|
-- know that an ABE will take place, and we replace the call by
|
63 |
|
|
-- a raise of Program_Error. If the call is indirect, then we don't
|
64 |
|
|
-- know that the PE will be raised, since the call might be guarded
|
65 |
|
|
-- by a conditional. In this case we set Do_Elab_Check on the call
|
66 |
|
|
-- so that a dynamic check is generated, and output a warning.
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
-- For calls to a subprogram in a with'ed unit, we require that
|
69 |
|
|
-- a pragma Elaborate_All or pragma Elaborate be present, or that
|
70 |
|
|
-- the referenced unit have a pragma Preelaborate, pragma Pure, or
|
71 |
|
|
-- pragma Elaborate_Body. If none of these conditions is met, then
|
72 |
|
|
-- a warning is generated that a pragma Elaborate_All may be needed.
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
-- For the case of an elaboration call at some inner level, we are
|
75 |
|
|
-- interested in tracing only calls to subprograms at the same level,
|
76 |
|
|
-- i.e. those that can be called during elaboration. Any calls to
|
77 |
|
|
-- outer level routines cannot cause ABE's as a result of the original
|
78 |
|
|
-- call (there might be an outer level call to the subprogram from
|
79 |
|
|
-- outside that causes the ABE, but that gets analyzed separately).
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
-- Note that we never trace calls to inner level subprograms, since
|
82 |
|
|
-- these cannot result in ABE's unless there is an elaboration problem
|
83 |
|
|
-- at a lower level, which will be separately detected.
|
84 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
-- Note on pragma Elaborate. The checking here assumes that a pragma
|
86 |
|
|
-- Elaborate on a with'ed unit guarantees that subprograms within the
|
87 |
|
|
-- unit can be called without causing an ABE. This is not in fact the
|
88 |
|
|
-- case since pragma Elaborate does not guarantee the transitive
|
89 |
|
|
-- coverage guaranteed by Elaborate_All. However, we leave this issue
|
90 |
|
|
-- up to the binder, which has generates warnings if there are possible
|
91 |
|
|
-- problems in the use of pragma Elaborate.
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
94 |
|
|
-- Instantiation Elaboration Errors --
|
95 |
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
96 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
-- A special case arises when an instantiation appears in a context
|
98 |
|
|
-- that is known to be before the body is elaborated, e.g.
|
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
-- generic package x is ...
|
101 |
|
|
-- ...
|
102 |
|
|
-- package xx is new x;
|
103 |
|
|
-- ...
|
104 |
|
|
-- package body x is ...
|
105 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
-- In this situation it is certain that an elaboration error will
|
107 |
|
|
-- occur, and an unconditional raise Program_Error statement is
|
108 |
|
|
-- inserted before the instantiation, and a warning generated.
|
109 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
-- The problem is that in this case we have no place to put the
|
111 |
|
|
-- body of the instantiation. We can't put it in the normal place,
|
112 |
|
|
-- because it is too early, and will cause errors to occur as a
|
113 |
|
|
-- result of referencing entities before they are declared.
|
114 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
-- Our approach in this case is simply to avoid creating the body
|
116 |
|
|
-- of the instantiation in such a case. The instantiation spec is
|
117 |
|
|
-- modified to include dummy bodies for all subprograms, so that
|
118 |
|
|
-- the resulting code does not contain subprogram specs with no
|
119 |
|
|
-- corresponding bodies.
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
procedure Check_Elab_Call
|
122 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
123 |
|
|
Outer_Scope : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
124 |
|
|
In_Init_Proc : Boolean := False);
|
125 |
|
|
-- Check a call for possible elaboration problems. The node N is either
|
126 |
|
|
-- an N_Function_Call or N_Procedure_Call_Statement node. The Outer_Scope
|
127 |
|
|
-- argument indicates whether this is an outer level call from Sem_Res
|
128 |
|
|
-- (Outer_Scope set to Empty), or an internal recursive call (Outer_Scope
|
129 |
|
|
-- set to entity of outermost call, see body). Flag In_Init_Proc should be
|
130 |
|
|
-- set whenever the current context is a type init proc.
|
131 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
procedure Check_Elab_Calls;
|
133 |
|
|
-- Not all the processing for Check_Elab_Call can be done at the time
|
134 |
|
|
-- of calls to Check_Elab_Call. This is because for internal calls, we
|
135 |
|
|
-- need to wait to complete the check until all generic bodies have been
|
136 |
|
|
-- instantiated. The Check_Elab_Calls procedure cleans up these waiting
|
137 |
|
|
-- checks. It is called once after the completion of instantiation.
|
138 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
procedure Check_Elab_Assign (N : Node_Id);
|
140 |
|
|
-- N is either the left side of an assignment, or a procedure argument for
|
141 |
|
|
-- a mode OUT or IN OUT formal. This procedure checks for a possible case
|
142 |
|
|
-- of access to an entity from elaboration code before the entity has been
|
143 |
|
|
-- initialized, and issues appropriate warnings.
|
144 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
procedure Check_Elab_Instantiation
|
146 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
147 |
|
|
Outer_Scope : Entity_Id := Empty);
|
148 |
|
|
-- Check an instantiation for possible elaboration problems. N is an
|
149 |
|
|
-- instantiation node (N_Package_Instantiation, N_Function_Instantiation,
|
150 |
|
|
-- or N_Procedure_Instantiation), and Outer_Scope indicates if this is
|
151 |
|
|
-- an outer level call from Sem_Ch12 (Outer_Scope set to Empty), or an
|
152 |
|
|
-- internal recursive call (Outer_Scope set to scope of outermost call,
|
153 |
|
|
-- see body for further details). The returned value is relevant only
|
154 |
|
|
-- for an outer level call, and is set to False if an elaboration error
|
155 |
|
|
-- is bound to occur on the instantiation, and True otherwise. This is
|
156 |
|
|
-- used by the caller to signal that the body of the instance should
|
157 |
|
|
-- not be generated (see detailed description in body).
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
procedure Check_Task_Activation (N : Node_Id);
|
160 |
|
|
-- at the point at which tasks are activated in a package body, check
|
161 |
|
|
-- that the bodies of the tasks are elaborated.
|
162 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
end Sem_Elab;
|