1 |
711 |
jeremybenn |
@c Copyright (C) 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
2 |
|
|
@c This is part of the GCC manual.
|
3 |
|
|
@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
@node Languages
|
6 |
|
|
@chapter Language Front Ends in GCC
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
The interface to front ends for languages in GCC, and in particular
|
9 |
|
|
the @code{tree} structure (@pxref{GENERIC}), was initially designed for
|
10 |
|
|
C, and many aspects of it are still somewhat biased towards C and
|
11 |
|
|
C-like languages. It is, however, reasonably well suited to other
|
12 |
|
|
procedural languages, and front ends for many such languages have been
|
13 |
|
|
written for GCC@.
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Writing a compiler as a front end for GCC, rather than compiling
|
16 |
|
|
directly to assembler or generating C code which is then compiled by
|
17 |
|
|
GCC, has several advantages:
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
20 |
|
|
@item GCC front ends benefit from the support for many different
|
21 |
|
|
target machines already present in GCC@.
|
22 |
|
|
@item GCC front ends benefit from all the optimizations in GCC@. Some
|
23 |
|
|
of these, such as alias analysis, may work better when GCC is
|
24 |
|
|
compiling directly from source code then when it is compiling from
|
25 |
|
|
generated C code.
|
26 |
|
|
@item Better debugging information is generated when compiling
|
27 |
|
|
directly from source code than when going via intermediate generated C
|
28 |
|
|
code.
|
29 |
|
|
@end itemize
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Because of the advantages of writing a compiler as a GCC front end,
|
32 |
|
|
GCC front ends have also been created for languages very different
|
33 |
|
|
from those for which GCC was designed, such as the declarative
|
34 |
|
|
logic/functional language Mercury. For these reasons, it may also be
|
35 |
|
|
useful to implement compilers created for specialized purposes (for
|
36 |
|
|
example, as part of a research project) as GCC front ends.
|