Subversion Repositories openrisc

// The hack for PR c++/44909 breaks this testcase.  We need feedback

// from the C++ committee to know how to proceed.

// { dg-options -std=c++0x }

struct A

{

  A();

  A(A&);

};

struct B;

struct BP

{

  BP(const B&);

};

struct B

{

  B();

  B(B&&);

  B(const BP&);

};

// If B(B&&) suppresses the B copy constructor, then copying the B

// subobject of C should use B(const BP&).  But we ignore that constructor

// in order to break the cycle in 44909.  Perhaps the move ctor shouldn't

// suppress the copy ctor?

// As of DR 1082, it doesn't suppress it.

struct C: A, B { };             // { dg-error "use of deleted" }

C c;

C c2(c);                        // { dg-error "deleted" }