Subversion Repositories openrisc

// { dg-do compile }

// { dg-options "-std=gnu++98" }

// Origin: 

// c++/9154: poor error message for ">>" vs "> >" in template argument list

/*

 * Test that the error message is issued properly

 */

template 

class A {};

A> blah;  // { dg-error "should be '> >' within" }

A> blah2; // { dg-error "spurious '>>'" }

/*

 * Test that a few valid constructs containing a ">>" token in a

 * template argument list are handled correctly.

 */

template 

void B(void) {}

int Btest()

{

  B<256 >> 4>();

}

template >4>

struct C {};

template       struct D {};

template  struct E {};

E>2 > > E1;

const int x = 0;

E>x > > E2;

template  struct F {

  typedef int I;

};

template >2 >::I>

struct G {};

/*

 * In this special case, a valid type-id (H() is a function type) is followed

 * by '>>', but the argument should still be parsed as an expression, which

 * will then be rejected as non-constant expression.

 */

struct H

{

  int operator >>(int);

};

template  struct L {};

L> 5> l;  // { dg-error "" "non-constant" }

/*

 * This case used to not emit the nice error message because of a typo

 *  in the code.

 */

template 

struct K {};

void KFunc(void);

A> k1;  // { dg-error "" }

K<&KFunc>> k2; // { dg-error "" }