1 |
38 |
julius |
========= Binutils Maintainers =========
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
|
4 |
|
|
of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
|
5 |
|
|
the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
|
6 |
|
|
programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
|
7 |
|
|
opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
|
8 |
|
|
GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
|
9 |
|
|
shared amoungst the projects.
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
The home page for binutils is:
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
and patches should be sent to:
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
binutils@sourceware.org
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
|
20 |
|
|
top level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
and not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top level
|
25 |
|
|
configure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) should
|
26 |
|
|
be sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdb
|
27 |
|
|
lists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and
|
28 |
|
|
gdb-patches@sourceware.org).
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
The following people have permission to check patches into the
|
33 |
|
|
repository without obtaining approval first:
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Nick Clifton (head maintainer)
|
36 |
|
|
Richard Henderson
|
37 |
|
|
Ian Lance Taylor
|
38 |
|
|
Jeff Law
|
39 |
|
|
Jim Wilson
|
40 |
|
|
DJ Delorie
|
41 |
|
|
Alan Modra
|
42 |
|
|
Michael Meissner
|
43 |
|
|
Daniel Jacobowitz
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
--------- Maintainers ---------
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
|
48 |
|
|
permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
|
49 |
|
|
that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
|
50 |
|
|
the immediate domain that they maintain.
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
|
53 |
|
|
falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
|
54 |
|
|
maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
|
55 |
|
|
maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
|
56 |
|
|
responsibility among the other maintainers.
|
57 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
ALPHA Richard Henderson
|
59 |
|
|
ARM Nick Clifton
|
60 |
|
|
ARM Richard Earnshaw
|
61 |
|
|
ARM Paul Brook
|
62 |
|
|
ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell
|
63 |
|
|
AVR Denis Chertykov
|
64 |
|
|
AVR Marek Michalkiewicz
|
65 |
|
|
BFIN Jie Zhang
|
66 |
|
|
BFIN Bernd Schmidt
|
67 |
|
|
BUILD SYSTEM Ben Elliston
|
68 |
|
|
BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz
|
69 |
|
|
CR16 M R Swami Reddy
|
70 |
|
|
CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson
|
71 |
|
|
CRX M R Swami Reddy
|
72 |
|
|
DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias
|
73 |
|
|
DWARF2 Jason Merrill
|
74 |
|
|
FR30 Dave Brolley
|
75 |
|
|
FRV Dave Brolley
|
76 |
|
|
FRV Alexandre Oliva
|
77 |
|
|
H8300 Anil Paranjpe
|
78 |
|
|
HPPA Dave Anglin
|
79 |
|
|
HPPA elf32 Alan Modra
|
80 |
|
|
HPPA elf64 Jeff Law [Basic maintainance only]
|
81 |
|
|
IA-64 Jim Wilson
|
82 |
|
|
IQ2000 Stan Cox
|
83 |
|
|
i860 Jason Eckhardt
|
84 |
|
|
ix86 H.J. Lu
|
85 |
|
|
ix86 PE Christopher Faylor
|
86 |
|
|
ix86 COFF DJ Delorie
|
87 |
|
|
ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich
|
88 |
|
|
M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez
|
89 |
|
|
M68k Ben Elliston
|
90 |
|
|
M88k Mark Kettenis
|
91 |
|
|
MAXQ Inderpreet Singh
|
92 |
|
|
MEP Dave Brolley
|
93 |
|
|
MIPS Eric Christopher
|
94 |
|
|
MIPS Thiemo Seufer
|
95 |
|
|
MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson
|
96 |
|
|
MN10300 Eric Christopher
|
97 |
|
|
MN10300 Alexandre Oliva
|
98 |
|
|
MSP430 Dmitry Diky
|
99 |
|
|
NetBSD support Matt Thomas
|
100 |
|
|
PPC Geoff Keating
|
101 |
|
|
PPC Alan Modra
|
102 |
|
|
PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez
|
103 |
|
|
s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky
|
104 |
|
|
SCORE Mei Ligang
|
105 |
|
|
SH Alexandre Oliva
|
106 |
|
|
SH Kaz Kojima
|
107 |
|
|
SPARC Jakub Jelinek
|
108 |
|
|
SPU Alan Modra
|
109 |
|
|
TESTSUITES Ben Elliston
|
110 |
|
|
TIC4X Svein Seldal
|
111 |
|
|
TIC54X Timothy Wall
|
112 |
|
|
VAX Matt Thomas
|
113 |
|
|
VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw
|
114 |
|
|
x86_64 Jan Hubicka
|
115 |
|
|
x86_64 Andreas Jaeger
|
116 |
|
|
x86_64 H.J. Lu
|
117 |
|
|
Xtensa Bob Wilson
|
118 |
|
|
z80 Arnold Metselaar
|
119 |
|
|
z8k Christian Groessler
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
|
123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
|
125 |
|
|
disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
|
126 |
|
|
It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
|
127 |
|
|
is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
|
128 |
|
|
CGEN and the files that it creates.
|
129 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
|
131 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
cgen@sourceware.org
|
133 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
The current CGEN maintainers are:
|
135 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
Doug Evans, Frank Eigler
|
137 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
--------- Write After Approval ---------
|
139 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
|
141 |
|
|
changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
|
142 |
|
|
one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
|
143 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
145 |
|
|
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
|
146 |
|
|
remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
147 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
|
149 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
|
151 |
|
|
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
|
152 |
|
|
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
|
153 |
|
|
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
|
154 |
|
|
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
|
155 |
|
|
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
156 |
|
|
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
157 |
|
|
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
|
160 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
|
162 |
|
|
also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
|
163 |
|
|
only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
|
164 |
|
|
ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
|
165 |
|
|
burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
|
166 |
|
|
great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
|
167 |
|
|
the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
|
168 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Daniel Jacobowitz
|
170 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
-------- Testsuites ---------------
|
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should be
|
174 |
|
|
considered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list for
|
175 |
|
|
approval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility the
|
176 |
|
|
relevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.
|
177 |
|
|
Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-priveleges
|
178 |
|
|
person.
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
-------- Configure patches ----------
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)
|
183 |
|
|
are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approved
|
184 |
|
|
by the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the config
|
185 |
|
|
maintainer at:
|
186 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
config-patches@gnu.org
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
--------- Creating Branches ---------
|
190 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branch
|
192 |
|
|
to use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSF
|
193 |
|
|
policies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from people
|
194 |
|
|
with appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legal
|
195 |
|
|
requirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equally
|
196 |
|
|
to contributions on a branch.
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch of
|
199 |
|
|
the form:
|
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
binutils--
|
202 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initials
|
204 |
|
|
if you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch created
|
205 |
|
|
by The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for
|
206 |
|
|
"org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choice
|
207 |
|
|
for "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so
|
208 |
|
|
"name" may contain additional hyphens.
|
209 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop a
|
211 |
|
|
port of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriate
|
212 |
|
|
choice of branch name would be:
|
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some
|
217 |
|
|
organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you
|
218 |
|
|
should follow these rules:
|
219 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.
|
221 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.
|
223 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
For example:
|
225 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
binutils-tgc-fm_20050101
|
227 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:
|
231 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
1. Check out binutils, so that you have a CVS checkout corresponding
|
233 |
|
|
to the initial state of your branch.
|
234 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
2. Create a tag:
|
236 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
cvs tag binutils---branchpoint
|
238 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
That tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what's
|
240 |
|
|
changed on the branch relative to the initial state.
|
241 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
3. Create the branch:
|
243 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
cvs rtag -b -r binutils---branchpoint \
|
245 |
|
|
binutils---branch
|
246 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
4. Document the branch:
|
248 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and check
|
250 |
|
|
that file in. All branch descriptions should be added to the
|
251 |
|
|
HEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modify
|
252 |
|
|
binutils/BRANCHES on a branch!
|
253 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not create
|
255 |
|
|
without the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
|