OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc/openrisc/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-old/] [gcc-4.2.2/] [gcc/] [doc/] [include/] [funding.texi] - Blame information for rev 867

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 38 julius
@ignore
2
@c Set file name and title for man page.
3
@setfilename fsf-funding
4
@settitle Funding Free Software
5
@c man begin SEEALSO
6
gpl(7), gfdl(7).
7
@c man end
8
@end ignore
9
@node Funding
10
@c man begin DESCRIPTION
11
@unnumbered Funding Free Software
12
 
13
If you want to have more free software a few years from now, it makes
14
sense for you to help encourage people to contribute funds for its
15
development.  The most effective approach known is to encourage
16
commercial redistributors to donate.
17
 
18
Users of free software systems can boost the pace of development by
19
encouraging for-a-fee distributors to donate part of their selling price
20
to free software developers---the Free Software Foundation, and others.
21
 
22
The way to convince distributors to do this is to demand it and expect
23
it from them.  So when you compare distributors, judge them partly by
24
how much they give to free software development.  Show distributors
25
they must compete to be the one who gives the most.
26
 
27
To make this approach work, you must insist on numbers that you can
28
compare, such as, ``We will donate ten dollars to the Frobnitz project
29
for each disk sold.''  Don't be satisfied with a vague promise, such as
30
``A portion of the profits are donated,'' since it doesn't give a basis
31
for comparison.
32
 
33
Even a precise fraction ``of the profits from this disk'' is not very
34
meaningful, since creative accounting and unrelated business decisions
35
can greatly alter what fraction of the sales price counts as profit.
36
If the price you pay is $50, ten percent of the profit is probably
37
less than a dollar; it might be a few cents, or nothing at all.
38
 
39
Some redistributors do development work themselves.  This is useful too;
40
but to keep everyone honest, you need to inquire how much they do, and
41
what kind.  Some kinds of development make much more long-term
42
difference than others.  For example, maintaining a separate version of
43
a program contributes very little; maintaining the standard version of a
44
program for the whole community contributes much.  Easy new ports
45
contribute little, since someone else would surely do them; difficult
46
ports such as adding a new CPU to the GNU Compiler Collection contribute more;
47
major new features or packages contribute the most.
48
 
49
By establishing the idea that supporting further development is ``the
50
proper thing to do'' when distributing free software for a fee, we can
51
assure a steady flow of resources into making more free software.
52
@c man end
53
 
54
@display
55
@c man begin COPYRIGHT
56
Copyright @copyright{} 1994 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
57
Verbatim copying and redistribution of this section is permitted
58
without royalty; alteration is not permitted.
59
@c man end
60
@end display

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.