Subversion Repositories openrisc_me

This is doc/cppinternals.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.8 from

/scratch/mitchell/gcc-releases/gcc-4.2.2/gcc-4.2.2/gcc/doc/cppinternals.texi.

INFO-DIR-SECTION Software development

START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY

* Cpplib: (cppinternals).      Cpplib internals.

END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY

   This file documents the internals of the GNU C Preprocessor.

   Copyright 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

   Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this

manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are

preserved on all copies.

   Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of

this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also

that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms

of a permission notice identical to this one.

   Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this

manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified

versions.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Top,  Next: Conventions,  Up: (dir)

The GNU C Preprocessor Internals

********************************

1 Cpplib--the GNU C Preprocessor

********************************

The GNU C preprocessor is implemented as a library, "cpplib", so it can

be easily shared between a stand-alone preprocessor, and a preprocessor

integrated with the C, C++ and Objective-C front ends.  It is also

available for use by other programs, though this is not recommended as

its exposed interface has not yet reached a point of reasonable

stability.

   The library has been written to be re-entrant, so that it can be used

to preprocess many files simultaneously if necessary.  It has also been

written with the preprocessing token as the fundamental unit; the

preprocessor in previous versions of GCC would operate on text strings

as the fundamental unit.

   This brief manual documents the internals of cpplib, and explains

some of the tricky issues.  It is intended that, along with the

comments in the source code, a reasonably competent C programmer should

be able to figure out what the code is doing, and why things have been

implemented the way they have.

* Menu:

* Conventions::         Conventions used in the code.

* Lexer::               The combined C, C++ and Objective-C Lexer.

* Hash Nodes::          All identifiers are entered into a hash table.

* Macro Expansion::     Macro expansion algorithm.

* Token Spacing::       Spacing and paste avoidance issues.

* Line Numbering::      Tracking location within files.

* Guard Macros::        Optimizing header files with guard macros.

* Files::               File handling.

* Concept Index::       Index.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Conventions,  Next: Lexer,  Prev: Top,  Up: Top

Conventions

***********

cpplib has two interfaces--one is exposed internally only, and the

other is for both internal and external use.

   The convention is that functions and types that are exposed to

multiple files internally are prefixed with `_cpp_', and are to be

found in the file `internal.h'.  Functions and types exposed to external

clients are in `cpplib.h', and prefixed with `cpp_'.  For historical

reasons this is no longer quite true, but we should strive to stick to

it.

   We are striving to reduce the information exposed in `cpplib.h' to

the bare minimum necessary, and then to keep it there.  This makes clear

exactly what external clients are entitled to assume, and allows us to

change internals in the future without worrying whether library clients

are perhaps relying on some kind of undocumented implementation-specific

behavior.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Lexer,  Next: Hash Nodes,  Prev: Conventions,  Up: Top

The Lexer

*********

Overview

========

The lexer is contained in the file `lex.c'.  It is a hand-coded lexer,

and not implemented as a state machine.  It can understand C, C++ and

Objective-C source code, and has been extended to allow reasonably

successful preprocessing of assembly language.  The lexer does not make

an initial pass to strip out trigraphs and escaped newlines, but handles

them as they are encountered in a single pass of the input file.  It

returns preprocessing tokens individually, not a line at a time.

   It is mostly transparent to users of the library, since the library's

interface for obtaining the next token, `cpp_get_token', takes care of

lexing new tokens, handling directives, and expanding macros as

necessary.  However, the lexer does expose some functionality so that

clients of the library can easily spell a given token, such as

`cpp_spell_token' and `cpp_token_len'.  These functions are useful when

generating diagnostics, and for emitting the preprocessed output.

Lexing a token

==============

Lexing of an individual token is handled by `_cpp_lex_direct' and its

subroutines.  In its current form the code is quite complicated, with

read ahead characters and such-like, since it strives to not step back

in the character stream in preparation for handling non-ASCII file

encodings.  The current plan is to convert any such files to UTF-8

before processing them.  This complexity is therefore unnecessary and

will be removed, so I'll not discuss it further here.

   The job of `_cpp_lex_direct' is simply to lex a token.  It is not

responsible for issues like directive handling, returning lookahead

tokens directly, multiple-include optimization, or conditional block

skipping.  It necessarily has a minor ro^le to play in memory

management of lexed lines.  I discuss these issues in a separate section

(*note Lexing a line::).

   The lexer places the token it lexes into storage pointed to by the

variable `cur_token', and then increments it.  This variable is

important for correct diagnostic positioning.  Unless a specific line

and column are passed to the diagnostic routines, they will examine the

`line' and `col' values of the token just before the location that

`cur_token' points to, and use that location to report the diagnostic.

   The lexer does not consider whitespace to be a token in its own

right.  If whitespace (other than a new line) precedes a token, it sets

the `PREV_WHITE' bit in the token's flags.  Each token has its `line'

and `col' variables set to the line and column of the first character

of the token.  This line number is the line number in the translation

unit, and can be converted to a source (file, line) pair using the line

map code.

   The first token on a logical, i.e. unescaped, line has the flag

`BOL' set for beginning-of-line.  This flag is intended for internal

use, both to distinguish a `#' that begins a directive from one that

doesn't, and to generate a call-back to clients that want to be

notified about the start of every non-directive line with tokens on it.

Clients cannot reliably determine this for themselves: the first token

might be a macro, and the tokens of a macro expansion do not have the

`BOL' flag set.  The macro expansion may even be empty, and the next

token on the line certainly won't have the `BOL' flag set.

   New lines are treated specially; exactly how the lexer handles them

is context-dependent.  The C standard mandates that directives are

terminated by the first unescaped newline character, even if it appears

in the middle of a macro expansion.  Therefore, if the state variable

`in_directive' is set, the lexer returns a `CPP_EOF' token, which is

normally used to indicate end-of-file, to indicate end-of-directive.

In a directive a `CPP_EOF' token never means end-of-file.

Conveniently, if the caller was `collect_args', it already handles

`CPP_EOF' as if it were end-of-file, and reports an error about an

unterminated macro argument list.

   The C standard also specifies that a new line in the middle of the

arguments to a macro is treated as whitespace.  This white space is

important in case the macro argument is stringified.  The state variable

`parsing_args' is nonzero when the preprocessor is collecting the

arguments to a macro call.  It is set to 1 when looking for the opening

parenthesis to a function-like macro, and 2 when collecting the actual

arguments up to the closing parenthesis, since these two cases need to

be distinguished sometimes.  One such time is here: the lexer sets the

`PREV_WHITE' flag of a token if it meets a new line when `parsing_args'

is set to 2.  It doesn't set it if it meets a new line when

`parsing_args' is 1, since then code like

     #define foo() bar

     foo

     baz

would be output with an erroneous space before `baz':

     foo

      baz

   This is a good example of the subtlety of getting token spacing

correct in the preprocessor; there are plenty of tests in the testsuite

for corner cases like this.

   The lexer is written to treat each of `\r', `\n', `\r\n' and `\n\r'

as a single new line indicator.  This allows it to transparently

preprocess MS-DOS, Macintosh and Unix files without their needing to

pass through a special filter beforehand.

   We also decided to treat a backslash, either `\' or the trigraph

`??/', separated from one of the above newline indicators by

non-comment whitespace only, as intending to escape the newline.  It

tends to be a typing mistake, and cannot reasonably be mistaken for

anything else in any of the C-family grammars.  Since handling it this

way is not strictly conforming to the ISO standard, the library issues a

warning wherever it encounters it.

   Handling newlines like this is made simpler by doing it in one place

only.  The function `handle_newline' takes care of all newline

characters, and `skip_escaped_newlines' takes care of arbitrarily long

sequences of escaped newlines, deferring to `handle_newline' to handle

the newlines themselves.

   The most painful aspect of lexing ISO-standard C and C++ is handling

trigraphs and backlash-escaped newlines.  Trigraphs are processed before

any interpretation of the meaning of a character is made, and

unfortunately there is a trigraph representation for a backslash, so it

is possible for the trigraph `??/' to introduce an escaped newline.

   Escaped newlines are tedious because theoretically they can occur

anywhere--between the `+' and `=' of the `+=' token, within the

characters of an identifier, and even between the `*' and `/' that

terminates a comment.  Moreover, you cannot be sure there is just

one--there might be an arbitrarily long sequence of them.

   So, for example, the routine that lexes a number, `parse_number',

cannot assume that it can scan forwards until the first non-number

character and be done with it, because this could be the `\'

introducing an escaped newline, or the `?' introducing the trigraph

sequence that represents the `\' of an escaped newline.  If it

encounters a `?' or `\', it calls `skip_escaped_newlines' to skip over

any potential escaped newlines before checking whether the number has

been finished.

   Similarly code in the main body of `_cpp_lex_direct' cannot simply

check for a `=' after a `+' character to determine whether it has a

`+=' token; it needs to be prepared for an escaped newline of some

sort.  Such cases use the function `get_effective_char', which returns

the first character after any intervening escaped newlines.

   The lexer needs to keep track of the correct column position,

including counting tabs as specified by the `-ftabstop=' option.  This

should be done even within C-style comments; they can appear in the

middle of a line, and we want to report diagnostics in the correct

position for text appearing after the end of the comment.

   Some identifiers, such as `__VA_ARGS__' and poisoned identifiers,

may be invalid and require a diagnostic.  However, if they appear in a

macro expansion we don't want to complain with each use of the macro.

It is therefore best to catch them during the lexing stage, in

`parse_identifier'.  In both cases, whether a diagnostic is needed or

not is dependent upon the lexer's state.  For example, we don't want to

issue a diagnostic for re-poisoning a poisoned identifier, or for using

`__VA_ARGS__' in the expansion of a variable-argument macro.  Therefore

`parse_identifier' makes use of state flags to determine whether a

diagnostic is appropriate.  Since we change state on a per-token basis,

and don't lex whole lines at a time, this is not a problem.

   Another place where state flags are used to change behavior is whilst

lexing header names.  Normally, a `<' would be lexed as a single token.

After a `#include' directive, though, it should be lexed as a single

token as far as the nearest `>' character.  Note that we don't allow

the terminators of header names to be escaped; the first `"' or `>'

terminates the header name.

   Interpretation of some character sequences depends upon whether we

are lexing C, C++ or Objective-C, and on the revision of the standard in

force.  For example, `::' is a single token in C++, but in C it is two

separate `:' tokens and almost certainly a syntax error.  Such cases

are handled by `_cpp_lex_direct' based upon command-line flags stored

in the `cpp_options' structure.

   Once a token has been lexed, it leads an independent existence.  The

spelling of numbers, identifiers and strings is copied to permanent

storage from the original input buffer, so a token remains valid and

correct even if its source buffer is freed with `_cpp_pop_buffer'.  The

storage holding the spellings of such tokens remains until the client

program calls cpp_destroy, probably at the end of the translation unit.

Lexing a line

=============

When the preprocessor was changed to return pointers to tokens, one

feature I wanted was some sort of guarantee regarding how long a

returned pointer remains valid.  This is important to the stand-alone

preprocessor, the future direction of the C family front ends, and even

to cpplib itself internally.

   Occasionally the preprocessor wants to be able to peek ahead in the

token stream.  For example, after the name of a function-like macro, it

wants to check the next token to see if it is an opening parenthesis.

Another example is that, after reading the first few tokens of a

`#pragma' directive and not recognizing it as a registered pragma, it

wants to backtrack and allow the user-defined handler for unknown

pragmas to access the full `#pragma' token stream.  The stand-alone

preprocessor wants to be able to test the current token with the

previous one to see if a space needs to be inserted to preserve their

separate tokenization upon re-lexing (paste avoidance), so it needs to

be sure the pointer to the previous token is still valid.  The

recursive-descent C++ parser wants to be able to perform tentative

parsing arbitrarily far ahead in the token stream, and then to be able

to jump back to a prior position in that stream if necessary.

   The rule I chose, which is fairly natural, is to arrange that the

preprocessor lex all tokens on a line consecutively into a token buffer,

which I call a "token run", and when meeting an unescaped new line

(newlines within comments do not count either), to start lexing back at

the beginning of the run.  Note that we do _not_ lex a line of tokens

at once; if we did that `parse_identifier' would not have state flags

available to warn about invalid identifiers (*note Invalid

identifiers::).

   In other words, accessing tokens that appeared earlier in the current

line is valid, but since each logical line overwrites the tokens of the

previous line, tokens from prior lines are unavailable.  In particular,

since a directive only occupies a single logical line, this means that

the directive handlers like the `#pragma' handler can jump around in

the directive's tokens if necessary.

   Two issues remain: what about tokens that arise from macro

expansions, and what happens when we have a long line that overflows

the token run?

   Since we promise clients that we preserve the validity of pointers

that we have already returned for tokens that appeared earlier in the

line, we cannot reallocate the run.  Instead, on overflow it is

expanded by chaining a new token run on to the end of the existing one.

   The tokens forming a macro's replacement list are collected by the

`#define' handler, and placed in storage that is only freed by

`cpp_destroy'.  So if a macro is expanded in the line of tokens, the

pointers to the tokens of its expansion that are returned will always

remain valid.  However, macros are a little trickier than that, since

they give rise to three sources of fresh tokens.  They are the built-in

macros like `__LINE__', and the `#' and `##' operators for

stringification and token pasting.  I handled this by allocating space

for these tokens from the lexer's token run chain.  This means they

automatically receive the same lifetime guarantees as lexed tokens, and

we don't need to concern ourselves with freeing them.

   Lexing into a line of tokens solves some of the token memory

management issues, but not all.  The opening parenthesis after a

function-like macro name might lie on a different line, and the front

ends definitely want the ability to look ahead past the end of the

current line.  So cpplib only moves back to the start of the token run

at the end of a line if the variable `keep_tokens' is zero.

Line-buffering is quite natural for the preprocessor, and as a result

the only time cpplib needs to increment this variable is whilst looking

for the opening parenthesis to, and reading the arguments of, a

function-like macro.  In the near future cpplib will export an

interface to increment and decrement this variable, so that clients can

share full control over the lifetime of token pointers too.

   The routine `_cpp_lex_token' handles moving to new token runs,

calling `_cpp_lex_direct' to lex new tokens, or returning

previously-lexed tokens if we stepped back in the token stream.  It also

checks each token for the `BOL' flag, which might indicate a directive

that needs to be handled, or require a start-of-line call-back to be

made.  `_cpp_lex_token' also handles skipping over tokens in failed

conditional blocks, and invalidates the control macro of the

multiple-include optimization if a token was successfully lexed outside

a directive.  In other words, its callers do not need to concern

themselves with such issues.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Hash Nodes,  Next: Macro Expansion,  Prev: Lexer,  Up: Top

Hash Nodes

**********

When cpplib encounters an "identifier", it generates a hash code for it

and stores it in the hash table.  By "identifier" we mean tokens with

type `CPP_NAME'; this includes identifiers in the usual C sense, as

well as keywords, directive names, macro names and so on.  For example,

all of `pragma', `int', `foo' and `__GNUC__' are identifiers and hashed

when lexed.

   Each node in the hash table contain various information about the

identifier it represents.  For example, its length and type.  At any one

time, each identifier falls into exactly one of three categories:

   * Macros

     These have been declared to be macros, either on the command line

     or with `#define'.  A few, such as `__TIME__' are built-ins

     entered in the hash table during initialization.  The hash node

     for a normal macro points to a structure with more information

     about the macro, such as whether it is function-like, how many

     arguments it takes, and its expansion.  Built-in macros are

     flagged as special, and instead contain an enum indicating which

     of the various built-in macros it is.

   * Assertions

     Assertions are in a separate namespace to macros.  To enforce

     this, cpp actually prepends a `#' character before hashing and

     entering it in the hash table.  An assertion's node points to a

     chain of answers to that assertion.

   * Void

     Everything else falls into this category--an identifier that is not

     currently a macro, or a macro that has since been undefined with

     `#undef'.

     When preprocessing C++, this category also includes the named

     operators, such as `xor'.  In expressions these behave like the

     operators they represent, but in contexts where the spelling of a

     token matters they are spelt differently.  This spelling

     distinction is relevant when they are operands of the stringizing

     and pasting macro operators `#' and `##'.  Named operator hash

     nodes are flagged, both to catch the spelling distinction and to

     prevent them from being defined as macros.

   The same identifiers share the same hash node.  Since each identifier

token, after lexing, contains a pointer to its hash node, this is used

to provide rapid lookup of various information.  For example, when

parsing a `#define' statement, CPP flags each argument's identifier

hash node with the index of that argument.  This makes duplicated

argument checking an O(1) operation for each argument.  Similarly, for

each identifier in the macro's expansion, lookup to see if it is an

argument, and which argument it is, is also an O(1) operation.  Further,

each directive name, such as `endif', has an associated directive enum

stored in its hash node, so that directive lookup is also O(1).

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Macro Expansion,  Next: Token Spacing,  Prev: Hash Nodes,  Up: Top

Macro Expansion Algorithm

*************************

Macro expansion is a tricky operation, fraught with nasty corner cases

and situations that render what you thought was a nifty way to optimize

the preprocessor's expansion algorithm wrong in quite subtle ways.

   I strongly recommend you have a good grasp of how the C and C++

standards require macros to be expanded before diving into this

section, let alone the code!.  If you don't have a clear mental picture

of how things like nested macro expansion, stringification and token

pasting are supposed to work, damage to your sanity can quickly result.

Internal representation of macros

=================================

The preprocessor stores macro expansions in tokenized form.  This saves

repeated lexing passes during expansion, at the cost of a small

increase in memory consumption on average.  The tokens are stored

contiguously in memory, so a pointer to the first one and a token count

is all you need to get the replacement list of a macro.

   If the macro is a function-like macro the preprocessor also stores

its parameters, in the form of an ordered list of pointers to the hash

table entry of each parameter's identifier.  Further, in the macro's

stored expansion each occurrence of a parameter is replaced with a

special token of type `CPP_MACRO_ARG'.  Each such token holds the index

of the parameter it represents in the parameter list, which allows

rapid replacement of parameters with their arguments during expansion.

Despite this optimization it is still necessary to store the original

parameters to the macro, both for dumping with e.g., `-dD', and to warn

about non-trivial macro redefinitions when the parameter names have

changed.

Macro expansion overview

========================

The preprocessor maintains a "context stack", implemented as a linked

list of `cpp_context' structures, which together represent the macro

expansion state at any one time.  The `struct cpp_reader' member

variable `context' points to the current top of this stack.  The top

normally holds the unexpanded replacement list of the innermost macro

under expansion, except when cpplib is about to pre-expand an argument,

in which case it holds that argument's unexpanded tokens.

   When there are no macros under expansion, cpplib is in "base

context".  All contexts other than the base context contain a

contiguous list of tokens delimited by a starting and ending token.

When not in base context, cpplib obtains the next token from the list

of the top context.  If there are no tokens left in the list, it pops

that context off the stack, and subsequent ones if necessary, until an

unexhausted context is found or it returns to base context.  In base

context, cpplib reads tokens directly from the lexer.

   If it encounters an identifier that is both a macro and enabled for

expansion, cpplib prepares to push a new context for that macro on the

stack by calling the routine `enter_macro_context'.  When this routine

returns, the new context will contain the unexpanded tokens of the

replacement list of that macro.  In the case of function-like macros,

`enter_macro_context' also replaces any parameters in the replacement

list, stored as `CPP_MACRO_ARG' tokens, with the appropriate macro

argument.  If the standard requires that the parameter be replaced with

its expanded argument, the argument will have been fully macro expanded

first.

   `enter_macro_context' also handles special macros like `__LINE__'.

Although these macros expand to a single token which cannot contain any

further macros, for reasons of token spacing (*note Token Spacing::)

and simplicity of implementation, cpplib handles these special macros

by pushing a context containing just that one token.

   The final thing that `enter_macro_context' does before returning is

to mark the macro disabled for expansion (except for special macros

like `__TIME__').  The macro is re-enabled when its context is later

popped from the context stack, as described above.  This strict

ordering ensures that a macro is disabled whilst its expansion is being

scanned, but that it is _not_ disabled whilst any arguments to it are

being expanded.

Scanning the replacement list for macros to expand

==================================================

The C standard states that, after any parameters have been replaced

with their possibly-expanded arguments, the replacement list is scanned

for nested macros.  Further, any identifiers in the replacement list

that are not expanded during this scan are never again eligible for

expansion in the future, if the reason they were not expanded is that

the macro in question was disabled.

   Clearly this latter condition can only apply to tokens resulting from

argument pre-expansion.  Other tokens never have an opportunity to be

re-tested for expansion.  It is possible for identifiers that are

function-like macros to not expand initially but to expand during a

later scan.  This occurs when the identifier is the last token of an

argument (and therefore originally followed by a comma or a closing

parenthesis in its macro's argument list), and when it replaces its

parameter in the macro's replacement list, the subsequent token happens

to be an opening parenthesis (itself possibly the first token of an

argument).

   It is important to note that when cpplib reads the last token of a

given context, that context still remains on the stack.  Only when

looking for the _next_ token do we pop it off the stack and drop to a

lower context.  This makes backing up by one token easy, but more

importantly ensures that the macro corresponding to the current context

is still disabled when we are considering the last token of its

replacement list for expansion (or indeed expanding it).  As an

example, which illustrates many of the points above, consider

     #define foo(x) bar x

     foo(foo) (2)

which fully expands to `bar foo (2)'.  During pre-expansion of the

argument, `foo' does not expand even though the macro is enabled, since

it has no following parenthesis [pre-expansion of an argument only uses

tokens from that argument; it cannot take tokens from whatever follows

the macro invocation].  This still leaves the argument token `foo'

eligible for future expansion.  Then, when re-scanning after argument

replacement, the token `foo' is rejected for expansion, and marked

ineligible for future expansion, since the macro is now disabled.  It

is disabled because the replacement list `bar foo' of the macro is

still on the context stack.

   If instead the algorithm looked for an opening parenthesis first and

then tested whether the macro were disabled it would be subtly wrong.

In the example above, the replacement list of `foo' would be popped in

the process of finding the parenthesis, re-enabling `foo' and expanding

it a second time.

Looking for a function-like macro's opening parenthesis

=======================================================

Function-like macros only expand when immediately followed by a

parenthesis.  To do this cpplib needs to temporarily disable macros and

read the next token.  Unfortunately, because of spacing issues (*note

Token Spacing::), there can be fake padding tokens in-between, and if

the next real token is not a parenthesis cpplib needs to be able to

back up that one token as well as retain the information in any

intervening padding tokens.

   Backing up more than one token when macros are involved is not

permitted by cpplib, because in general it might involve issues like

restoring popped contexts onto the context stack, which are too hard.

Instead, searching for the parenthesis is handled by a special

function, `funlike_invocation_p', which remembers padding information

as it reads tokens.  If the next real token is not an opening

parenthesis, it backs up that one token, and then pushes an extra

context just containing the padding information if necessary.

Marking tokens ineligible for future expansion

==============================================

As discussed above, cpplib needs a way of marking tokens as

unexpandable.  Since the tokens cpplib handles are read-only once they

have been lexed, it instead makes a copy of the token and adds the flag

`NO_EXPAND' to the copy.

   For efficiency and to simplify memory management by avoiding having

to remember to free these tokens, they are allocated as temporary tokens

from the lexer's current token run (*note Lexing a line::) using the

function `_cpp_temp_token'.  The tokens are then re-used once the

current line of tokens has been read in.

   This might sound unsafe.  However, tokens runs are not re-used at the

end of a line if it happens to be in the middle of a macro argument

list, and cpplib only wants to back-up more than one lexer token in

situations where no macro expansion is involved, so the optimization is

safe.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Token Spacing,  Next: Line Numbering,  Prev: Macro Expansion,  Up: Top

Token Spacing

*************

First, consider an issue that only concerns the stand-alone

preprocessor: there needs to be a guarantee that re-reading its

preprocessed output results in an identical token stream.  Without

taking special measures, this might not be the case because of macro

substitution.  For example:

     #define PLUS +

     #define EMPTY

     #define f(x) =x=

     +PLUS -EMPTY- PLUS+ f(=)

             ==> + + - - + + = = =

     _not_

             ==> ++ -- ++ ===

   One solution would be to simply insert a space between all adjacent

tokens.  However, we would like to keep space insertion to a minimum,

both for aesthetic reasons and because it causes problems for people who

still try to abuse the preprocessor for things like Fortran source and

Makefiles.

   For now, just notice that when tokens are added (or removed, as

shown by the `EMPTY' example) from the original lexed token stream, we

need to check for accidental token pasting.  We call this "paste

avoidance".  Token addition and removal can only occur because of macro

expansion, but accidental pasting can occur in many places: both before

and after each macro replacement, each argument replacement, and

additionally each token created by the `#' and `##' operators.

   Look at how the preprocessor gets whitespace output correct

normally.  The `cpp_token' structure contains a flags byte, and one of

those flags is `PREV_WHITE'.  This is flagged by the lexer, and

indicates that the token was preceded by whitespace of some form other

than a new line.  The stand-alone preprocessor can use this flag to

decide whether to insert a space between tokens in the output.

   Now consider the result of the following macro expansion:

     #define add(x, y, z) x + y +z;

     sum = add (1,2, 3);

             ==> sum = 1 + 2 +3;

   The interesting thing here is that the tokens `1' and `2' are output

with a preceding space, and `3' is output without a preceding space,

but when lexed none of these tokens had that property.  Careful

consideration reveals that `1' gets its preceding whitespace from the

space preceding `add' in the macro invocation, _not_ replacement list.

`2' gets its whitespace from the space preceding the parameter `y' in

the macro replacement list, and `3' has no preceding space because

parameter `z' has none in the replacement list.

   Once lexed, tokens are effectively fixed and cannot be altered, since

pointers to them might be held in many places, in particular by

in-progress macro expansions.  So instead of modifying the two tokens

above, the preprocessor inserts a special token, which I call a

"padding token", into the token stream to indicate that spacing of the

subsequent token is special.  The preprocessor inserts padding tokens

in front of every macro expansion and expanded macro argument.  These

point to a "source token" from which the subsequent real token should

inherit its spacing.  In the above example, the source tokens are `add'

in the macro invocation, and `y' and `z' in the macro replacement list,

respectively.

   It is quite easy to get multiple padding tokens in a row, for

example if a macro's first replacement token expands straight into

another macro.

     #define foo bar

     #define bar baz

     [foo]

             ==> [baz]

   Here, two padding tokens are generated with sources the `foo' token

between the brackets, and the `bar' token from foo's replacement list,

respectively.  Clearly the first padding token is the one to use, so

the output code should contain a rule that the first padding token in a

sequence is the one that matters.

   But what if a macro expansion is left?  Adjusting the above example

slightly:

     #define foo bar

     #define bar EMPTY baz

     #define EMPTY

     [foo] EMPTY;

             ==> [ baz] ;

   As shown, now there should be a space before `baz' and the semicolon

in the output.

   The rules we decided above fail for `baz': we generate three padding

tokens, one per macro invocation, before the token `baz'.  We would

then have it take its spacing from the first of these, which carries

source token `foo' with no leading space.

   It is vital that cpplib get spacing correct in these examples since

any of these macro expansions could be stringified, where spacing

matters.

   So, this demonstrates that not just entering macro and argument

expansions, but leaving them requires special handling too.  I made

cpplib insert a padding token with a `NULL' source token when leaving

macro expansions, as well as after each replaced argument in a macro's

replacement list.  It also inserts appropriate padding tokens on either

side of tokens created by the `#' and `##' operators.  I expanded the

rule so that, if we see a padding token with a `NULL' source token,

_and_ that source token has no leading space, then we behave as if we

have seen no padding tokens at all.  A quick check shows this rule will

then get the above example correct as well.

   Now a relationship with paste avoidance is apparent: we have to be

careful about paste avoidance in exactly the same locations we have

padding tokens in order to get white space correct.  This makes

implementation of paste avoidance easy: wherever the stand-alone

preprocessor is fixing up spacing because of padding tokens, and it

turns out that no space is needed, it has to take the extra step to

check that a space is not needed after all to avoid an accidental paste.

The function `cpp_avoid_paste' advises whether a space is required

between two consecutive tokens.  To avoid excessive spacing, it tries

hard to only require a space if one is likely to be necessary, but for

reasons of efficiency it is slightly conservative and might recommend a

space where one is not strictly needed.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Line Numbering,  Next: Guard Macros,  Prev: Token Spacing,  Up: Top

Line numbering

**************

Just which line number anyway?

==============================

There are three reasonable requirements a cpplib client might have for

the line number of a token passed to it:

   * The source line it was lexed on.

   * The line it is output on.  This can be different to the line it was

     lexed on if, for example, there are intervening escaped newlines or

     C-style comments.  For example:

          foo /* A long

          comment */ bar \

          baz

          =>

          foo bar baz

   * If the token results from a macro expansion, the line of the macro

     name, or possibly the line of the closing parenthesis in the case

     of function-like macro expansion.

   The `cpp_token' structure contains `line' and `col' members.  The

lexer fills these in with the line and column of the first character of

the token.  Consequently, but maybe unexpectedly, a token from the

replacement list of a macro expansion carries the location of the token

within the `#define' directive, because cpplib expands a macro by

returning pointers to the tokens in its replacement list.  The current

implementation of cpplib assigns tokens created from built-in macros

and the `#' and `##' operators the location of the most recently lexed

token.  This is a because they are allocated from the lexer's token

runs, and because of the way the diagnostic routines infer the

appropriate location to report.

   The diagnostic routines in cpplib display the location of the most

recently _lexed_ token, unless they are passed a specific line and

column to report.  For diagnostics regarding tokens that arise from

macro expansions, it might also be helpful for the user to see the

original location in the macro definition that the token came from.

Since that is exactly the information each token carries, such an

enhancement could be made relatively easily in future.

   The stand-alone preprocessor faces a similar problem when determining

the correct line to output the token on: the position attached to a

token is fairly useless if the token came from a macro expansion.  All

tokens on a logical line should be output on its first physical line, so

the token's reported location is also wrong if it is part of a physical

line other than the first.

   To solve these issues, cpplib provides a callback that is generated

whenever it lexes a preprocessing token that starts a new logical line

other than a directive.  It passes this token (which may be a `CPP_EOF'

token indicating the end of the translation unit) to the callback

routine, which can then use the line and column of this token to

produce correct output.

Representation of line numbers

==============================

As mentioned above, cpplib stores with each token the line number that

it was lexed on.  In fact, this number is not the number of the line in

the source file, but instead bears more resemblance to the number of the

line in the translation unit.

   The preprocessor maintains a monotonic increasing line count, which

is incremented at every new line character (and also at the end of any

buffer that does not end in a new line).  Since a line number of zero is

useful to indicate certain special states and conditions, this variable

starts counting from one.

   This variable therefore uniquely enumerates each line in the

translation unit.  With some simple infrastructure, it is straight

forward to map from this to the original source file and line number

pair, saving space whenever line number information needs to be saved.

The code the implements this mapping lies in the files `line-map.c' and

`line-map.h'.

   Command-line macros and assertions are implemented by pushing a

buffer containing the right hand side of an equivalent `#define' or

`#assert' directive.  Some built-in macros are handled similarly.

Since these are all processed before the first line of the main input

file, it will typically have an assigned line closer to twenty than to

one.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Guard Macros,  Next: Files,  Prev: Line Numbering,  Up: Top

The Multiple-Include Optimization

*********************************

Header files are often of the form

     #ifndef FOO

     #define FOO

     ...

     #endif

to prevent the compiler from processing them more than once.  The

preprocessor notices such header files, so that if the header file

appears in a subsequent `#include' directive and `FOO' is defined, then

it is ignored and it doesn't preprocess or even re-open the file a

second time.  This is referred to as the "multiple include

optimization".

   Under what circumstances is such an optimization valid?  If the file

were included a second time, it can only be optimized away if that

inclusion would result in no tokens to return, and no relevant

directives to process.  Therefore the current implementation imposes

requirements and makes some allowances as follows:

  1. There must be no tokens outside the controlling `#if'-`#endif'

     pair, but whitespace and comments are permitted.

  2. There must be no directives outside the controlling directive

     pair, but the "null directive" (a line containing nothing other

     than a single `#' and possibly whitespace) is permitted.

  3. The opening directive must be of the form

          #ifndef FOO

     or

          #if !defined FOO     [equivalently, #if !defined(FOO)]

  4. In the second form above, the tokens forming the `#if' expression

     must have come directly from the source file--no macro expansion

     must have been involved.  This is because macro definitions can

     change, and tracking whether or not a relevant change has been

     made is not worth the implementation cost.

  5. There can be no `#else' or `#elif' directives at the outer

     conditional block level, because they would probably contain

     something of interest to a subsequent pass.

   First, when pushing a new file on the buffer stack,

`_stack_include_file' sets the controlling macro `mi_cmacro' to `NULL',

and sets `mi_valid' to `true'.  This indicates that the preprocessor

has not yet encountered anything that would invalidate the

multiple-include optimization.  As described in the next few

paragraphs, these two variables having these values effectively

indicates top-of-file.

   When about to return a token that is not part of a directive,

`_cpp_lex_token' sets `mi_valid' to `false'.  This enforces the

constraint that tokens outside the controlling conditional block

invalidate the optimization.

   The `do_if', when appropriate, and `do_ifndef' directive handlers

pass the controlling macro to the function `push_conditional'.  cpplib

maintains a stack of nested conditional blocks, and after processing

every opening conditional this function pushes an `if_stack' structure

onto the stack.  In this structure it records the controlling macro for

the block, provided there is one and we're at top-of-file (as described

above).  If an `#elif' or `#else' directive is encountered, the

controlling macro for that block is cleared to `NULL'.  Otherwise, it

survives until the `#endif' closing the block, upon which `do_endif'

sets `mi_valid' to true and stores the controlling macro in `mi_cmacro'.

   `_cpp_handle_directive' clears `mi_valid' when processing any

directive other than an opening conditional and the null directive.

With this, and requiring top-of-file to record a controlling macro, and

no `#else' or `#elif' for it to survive and be copied to `mi_cmacro' by

`do_endif', we have enforced the absence of directives outside the main

conditional block for the optimization to be on.

   Note that whilst we are inside the conditional block, `mi_valid' is

likely to be reset to `false', but this does not matter since the

closing `#endif' restores it to `true' if appropriate.

   Finally, since `_cpp_lex_direct' pops the file off the buffer stack

at `EOF' without returning a token, if the `#endif' directive was not

followed by any tokens, `mi_valid' is `true' and `_cpp_pop_file_buffer'

remembers the controlling macro associated with the file.  Subsequent

calls to `stack_include_file' result in no buffer being pushed if the

controlling macro is defined, effecting the optimization.

   A quick word on how we handle the

     #if !defined FOO

case.  `_cpp_parse_expr' and `parse_defined' take steps to see whether

the three stages `!', `defined-expression' and `end-of-directive' occur

in order in a `#if' expression.  If so, they return the guard macro to

`do_if' in the variable `mi_ind_cmacro', and otherwise set it to `NULL'.

`enter_macro_context' sets `mi_valid' to false, so if a macro was

expanded whilst parsing any part of the expression, then the

top-of-file test in `push_conditional' fails and the optimization is

turned off.

File: cppinternals.info,  Node: Files,  Next: Concept Index,  Prev: Guard Macros,  Up: Top

File Handling

*************

Fairly obviously, the file handling code of cpplib resides in the file

`files.c'.  It takes care of the details of file searching, opening,

reading and caching, for both the main source file and all the headers

it recursively includes.

   The basic strategy is to minimize the number of system calls.  On

many systems, the basic `open ()' and `fstat ()' system calls can be

quite expensive.  For every `#include'-d file, we need to try all the

directories in the search path until we find a match.  Some projects,

such as glibc, pass twenty or thirty include paths on the command line,

so this can rapidly become time consuming.

   For a header file we have not encountered before we have little

choice but to do this.  However, it is often the case that the same