1 |
281 |
jeremybenn |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 |
|
|
-- --
|
3 |
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
4 |
|
|
-- --
|
5 |
|
|
-- S E M _ C H 1 1 --
|
6 |
|
|
-- --
|
7 |
|
|
-- B o d y --
|
8 |
|
|
-- --
|
9 |
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2009, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
10 |
|
|
-- --
|
11 |
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
12 |
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
13 |
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
14 |
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
15 |
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
16 |
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
17 |
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
18 |
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
19 |
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
20 |
|
|
-- --
|
21 |
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
22 |
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
23 |
|
|
-- --
|
24 |
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
with Atree; use Atree;
|
27 |
|
|
with Checks; use Checks;
|
28 |
|
|
with Einfo; use Einfo;
|
29 |
|
|
with Errout; use Errout;
|
30 |
|
|
with Lib; use Lib;
|
31 |
|
|
with Lib.Xref; use Lib.Xref;
|
32 |
|
|
with Namet; use Namet;
|
33 |
|
|
with Nlists; use Nlists;
|
34 |
|
|
with Nmake; use Nmake;
|
35 |
|
|
with Opt; use Opt;
|
36 |
|
|
with Restrict; use Restrict;
|
37 |
|
|
with Rident; use Rident;
|
38 |
|
|
with Rtsfind; use Rtsfind;
|
39 |
|
|
with Sem; use Sem;
|
40 |
|
|
with Sem_Ch5; use Sem_Ch5;
|
41 |
|
|
with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
|
42 |
|
|
with Sem_Res; use Sem_Res;
|
43 |
|
|
with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
|
44 |
|
|
with Sem_Warn; use Sem_Warn;
|
45 |
|
|
with Sinfo; use Sinfo;
|
46 |
|
|
with Stand; use Stand;
|
47 |
|
|
with Uintp; use Uintp;
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
package body Sem_Ch11 is
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
52 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Exception_Declaration --
|
53 |
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Exception_Declaration (N : Node_Id) is
|
56 |
|
|
Id : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Identifier (N);
|
57 |
|
|
PF : constant Boolean := Is_Pure (Current_Scope);
|
58 |
|
|
begin
|
59 |
|
|
Generate_Definition (Id);
|
60 |
|
|
Enter_Name (Id);
|
61 |
|
|
Set_Ekind (Id, E_Exception);
|
62 |
|
|
Set_Exception_Code (Id, Uint_0);
|
63 |
|
|
Set_Etype (Id, Standard_Exception_Type);
|
64 |
|
|
Set_Is_Statically_Allocated (Id);
|
65 |
|
|
Set_Is_Pure (Id, PF);
|
66 |
|
|
end Analyze_Exception_Declaration;
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
--------------------------------
|
69 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Exception_Handlers --
|
70 |
|
|
--------------------------------
|
71 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Exception_Handlers (L : List_Id) is
|
73 |
|
|
Handler : Node_Id;
|
74 |
|
|
Choice : Entity_Id;
|
75 |
|
|
Id : Node_Id;
|
76 |
|
|
H_Scope : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
77 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
procedure Check_Duplication (Id : Node_Id);
|
79 |
|
|
-- Iterate through the identifiers in each handler to find duplicates
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
function Others_Present return Boolean;
|
82 |
|
|
-- Returns True if others handler is present
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
-----------------------
|
85 |
|
|
-- Check_Duplication --
|
86 |
|
|
-----------------------
|
87 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
procedure Check_Duplication (Id : Node_Id) is
|
89 |
|
|
Handler : Node_Id;
|
90 |
|
|
Id1 : Node_Id;
|
91 |
|
|
Id_Entity : Entity_Id := Entity (Id);
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
begin
|
94 |
|
|
if Present (Renamed_Entity (Id_Entity)) then
|
95 |
|
|
Id_Entity := Renamed_Entity (Id_Entity);
|
96 |
|
|
end if;
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Handler := First_Non_Pragma (L);
|
99 |
|
|
while Present (Handler) loop
|
100 |
|
|
Id1 := First (Exception_Choices (Handler));
|
101 |
|
|
while Present (Id1) loop
|
102 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
-- Only check against the exception choices which precede
|
104 |
|
|
-- Id in the handler, since the ones that follow Id have not
|
105 |
|
|
-- been analyzed yet and will be checked in a subsequent call.
|
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
if Id = Id1 then
|
108 |
|
|
return;
|
109 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
elsif Nkind (Id1) /= N_Others_Choice
|
111 |
|
|
and then
|
112 |
|
|
(Id_Entity = Entity (Id1)
|
113 |
|
|
or else (Id_Entity = Renamed_Entity (Entity (Id1))))
|
114 |
|
|
then
|
115 |
|
|
if Handler /= Parent (Id) then
|
116 |
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Id1);
|
117 |
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
118 |
|
|
("exception choice duplicates &#", Id, Id1);
|
119 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
else
|
121 |
|
|
if Ada_Version = Ada_83
|
122 |
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Id)
|
123 |
|
|
then
|
124 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
125 |
|
|
("(Ada 83): duplicate exception choice&", Id);
|
126 |
|
|
end if;
|
127 |
|
|
end if;
|
128 |
|
|
end if;
|
129 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (Id1);
|
131 |
|
|
end loop;
|
132 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
Next (Handler);
|
134 |
|
|
end loop;
|
135 |
|
|
end Check_Duplication;
|
136 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
--------------------
|
138 |
|
|
-- Others_Present --
|
139 |
|
|
--------------------
|
140 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
function Others_Present return Boolean is
|
142 |
|
|
H : Node_Id;
|
143 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
begin
|
145 |
|
|
H := First (L);
|
146 |
|
|
while Present (H) loop
|
147 |
|
|
if Nkind (H) /= N_Pragma
|
148 |
|
|
and then Nkind (First (Exception_Choices (H))) = N_Others_Choice
|
149 |
|
|
then
|
150 |
|
|
return True;
|
151 |
|
|
end if;
|
152 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
Next (H);
|
154 |
|
|
end loop;
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
return False;
|
157 |
|
|
end Others_Present;
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Exception_Handlers
|
160 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
begin
|
162 |
|
|
Handler := First (L);
|
163 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Exceptions, Handler);
|
164 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Exception_Handlers, Handler);
|
165 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
-- Kill current remembered values, since we don't know where we were
|
167 |
|
|
-- when the exception was raised.
|
168 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Kill_Current_Values;
|
170 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
-- Loop through handlers (which can include pragmas)
|
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
while Present (Handler) loop
|
174 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
-- If pragma just analyze it
|
176 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
if Nkind (Handler) = N_Pragma then
|
178 |
|
|
Analyze (Handler);
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
-- Otherwise we have a real exception handler
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
else
|
183 |
|
|
-- Deal with choice parameter. The exception handler is a
|
184 |
|
|
-- declarative part for the choice parameter, so it constitutes a
|
185 |
|
|
-- scope for visibility purposes. We create an entity to denote
|
186 |
|
|
-- the whole exception part, and use it as the scope of all the
|
187 |
|
|
-- choices, which may even have the same name without conflict.
|
188 |
|
|
-- This scope plays no other role in expansion or code generation.
|
189 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Choice := Choice_Parameter (Handler);
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
if Present (Choice) then
|
193 |
|
|
Set_Local_Raise_Not_OK (Handler);
|
194 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Choice) then
|
196 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Exception_Propagation, Choice);
|
197 |
|
|
end if;
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
if No (H_Scope) then
|
200 |
|
|
H_Scope :=
|
201 |
|
|
New_Internal_Entity
|
202 |
|
|
(E_Block, Current_Scope, Sloc (Choice), 'E');
|
203 |
|
|
end if;
|
204 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
Push_Scope (H_Scope);
|
206 |
|
|
Set_Etype (H_Scope, Standard_Void_Type);
|
207 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
-- Set the Finalization Chain entity to Error means that it
|
209 |
|
|
-- should not be used at that level but the parent one should
|
210 |
|
|
-- be used instead.
|
211 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
-- ??? this usage needs documenting in Einfo/Exp_Ch7 ???
|
213 |
|
|
-- ??? using Error for this non-error condition is nasty ???
|
214 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Set_Finalization_Chain_Entity (H_Scope, Error);
|
216 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
Enter_Name (Choice);
|
218 |
|
|
Set_Ekind (Choice, E_Variable);
|
219 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
if RTE_Available (RE_Exception_Occurrence) then
|
221 |
|
|
Set_Etype (Choice, RTE (RE_Exception_Occurrence));
|
222 |
|
|
end if;
|
223 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
Generate_Definition (Choice);
|
225 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
-- Indicate that choice has an initial value, since in effect
|
227 |
|
|
-- this field is assigned an initial value by the exception.
|
228 |
|
|
-- We also consider that it is modified in the source.
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
Set_Has_Initial_Value (Choice, True);
|
231 |
|
|
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (Choice, False);
|
232 |
|
|
end if;
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
Id := First (Exception_Choices (Handler));
|
235 |
|
|
while Present (Id) loop
|
236 |
|
|
if Nkind (Id) = N_Others_Choice then
|
237 |
|
|
if Present (Next (Id))
|
238 |
|
|
or else Present (Next (Handler))
|
239 |
|
|
or else Present (Prev (Id))
|
240 |
|
|
then
|
241 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("OTHERS must appear alone and last", Id);
|
242 |
|
|
end if;
|
243 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
else
|
245 |
|
|
Analyze (Id);
|
246 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
-- In most cases the choice has already been analyzed in
|
248 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Handled_Statement_Sequence, in order to expand
|
249 |
|
|
-- local handlers. This advance analysis does not take into
|
250 |
|
|
-- account the case in which a choice has the same name as
|
251 |
|
|
-- the choice parameter of the handler, which may hide an
|
252 |
|
|
-- outer exception. This pathological case appears in ACATS
|
253 |
|
|
-- B80001_3.adb, and requires an explicit check to verify
|
254 |
|
|
-- that the id is not hidden.
|
255 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
if not Is_Entity_Name (Id)
|
257 |
|
|
or else Ekind (Entity (Id)) /= E_Exception
|
258 |
|
|
or else
|
259 |
|
|
(Nkind (Id) = N_Identifier
|
260 |
|
|
and then Chars (Id) = Chars (Choice))
|
261 |
|
|
then
|
262 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("exception name expected", Id);
|
263 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
else
|
265 |
|
|
-- Emit a warning at the declaration level when a local
|
266 |
|
|
-- exception is never raised explicitly.
|
267 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
if Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs
|
269 |
|
|
and then not Is_Raised (Entity (Id))
|
270 |
|
|
and then Scope (Entity (Id)) = Current_Scope
|
271 |
|
|
then
|
272 |
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
273 |
|
|
("?exception & is never raised", Entity (Id), Id);
|
274 |
|
|
end if;
|
275 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
if Present (Renamed_Entity (Entity (Id))) then
|
277 |
|
|
if Entity (Id) = Standard_Numeric_Error then
|
278 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Obsolescent_Features, Id);
|
279 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
if Warn_On_Obsolescent_Feature then
|
281 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
282 |
|
|
("Numeric_Error is an " &
|
283 |
|
|
"obsolescent feature (RM J.6(1))?", Id);
|
284 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
285 |
|
|
("\use Constraint_Error instead?", Id);
|
286 |
|
|
end if;
|
287 |
|
|
end if;
|
288 |
|
|
end if;
|
289 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
Check_Duplication (Id);
|
291 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
-- Check for exception declared within generic formal
|
293 |
|
|
-- package (which is illegal, see RM 11.2(8))
|
294 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
declare
|
296 |
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id := Entity (Id);
|
297 |
|
|
Scop : Entity_Id;
|
298 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
begin
|
300 |
|
|
if Present (Renamed_Entity (Ent)) then
|
301 |
|
|
Ent := Renamed_Entity (Ent);
|
302 |
|
|
end if;
|
303 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
Scop := Scope (Ent);
|
305 |
|
|
while Scop /= Standard_Standard
|
306 |
|
|
and then Ekind (Scop) = E_Package
|
307 |
|
|
loop
|
308 |
|
|
if Nkind (Declaration_Node (Scop)) =
|
309 |
|
|
N_Package_Specification
|
310 |
|
|
and then
|
311 |
|
|
Nkind (Original_Node (Parent
|
312 |
|
|
(Declaration_Node (Scop)))) =
|
313 |
|
|
N_Formal_Package_Declaration
|
314 |
|
|
then
|
315 |
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
316 |
|
|
("exception& is declared in " &
|
317 |
|
|
"generic formal package", Id, Ent);
|
318 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
319 |
|
|
("\and therefore cannot appear in " &
|
320 |
|
|
"handler (RM 11.2(8))", Id);
|
321 |
|
|
exit;
|
322 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
-- If the exception is declared in an inner
|
324 |
|
|
-- instance, nothing else to check.
|
325 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
elsif Is_Generic_Instance (Scop) then
|
327 |
|
|
exit;
|
328 |
|
|
end if;
|
329 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
Scop := Scope (Scop);
|
331 |
|
|
end loop;
|
332 |
|
|
end;
|
333 |
|
|
end if;
|
334 |
|
|
end if;
|
335 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
Next (Id);
|
337 |
|
|
end loop;
|
338 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
-- Check for redundant handler (has only raise statement) and is
|
340 |
|
|
-- either an others handler, or is a specific handler when no
|
341 |
|
|
-- others handler is present.
|
342 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
if Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs
|
344 |
|
|
and then List_Length (Statements (Handler)) = 1
|
345 |
|
|
and then Nkind (First (Statements (Handler))) = N_Raise_Statement
|
346 |
|
|
and then No (Name (First (Statements (Handler))))
|
347 |
|
|
and then (not Others_Present
|
348 |
|
|
or else Nkind (First (Exception_Choices (Handler))) =
|
349 |
|
|
N_Others_Choice)
|
350 |
|
|
then
|
351 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
352 |
|
|
("useless handler contains only a reraise statement?",
|
353 |
|
|
Handler);
|
354 |
|
|
end if;
|
355 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
-- Now analyze the statements of this handler
|
357 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
Analyze_Statements (Statements (Handler));
|
359 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
-- If a choice was present, we created a special scope for it,
|
361 |
|
|
-- so this is where we pop that special scope to get rid of it.
|
362 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
if Present (Choice) then
|
364 |
|
|
End_Scope;
|
365 |
|
|
end if;
|
366 |
|
|
end if;
|
367 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
Next (Handler);
|
369 |
|
|
end loop;
|
370 |
|
|
end Analyze_Exception_Handlers;
|
371 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
--------------------------------
|
373 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Handled_Statements --
|
374 |
|
|
--------------------------------
|
375 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Handled_Statements (N : Node_Id) is
|
377 |
|
|
Handlers : constant List_Id := Exception_Handlers (N);
|
378 |
|
|
Handler : Node_Id;
|
379 |
|
|
Choice : Node_Id;
|
380 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
begin
|
382 |
|
|
if Present (Handlers) then
|
383 |
|
|
Kill_All_Checks;
|
384 |
|
|
end if;
|
385 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
-- We are now going to analyze the statements and then the exception
|
387 |
|
|
-- handlers. We certainly need to do things in this order to get the
|
388 |
|
|
-- proper sequential semantics for various warnings.
|
389 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
-- However, there is a glitch. When we process raise statements, an
|
391 |
|
|
-- optimization is to look for local handlers and specialize the code
|
392 |
|
|
-- in this case.
|
393 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
-- In order to detect if a handler is matching, we must have at least
|
395 |
|
|
-- analyzed the choices in the proper scope so that proper visibility
|
396 |
|
|
-- analysis is performed. Hence we analyze just the choices first,
|
397 |
|
|
-- before we analyze the statement sequence.
|
398 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
Handler := First_Non_Pragma (Handlers);
|
400 |
|
|
while Present (Handler) loop
|
401 |
|
|
Choice := First_Non_Pragma (Exception_Choices (Handler));
|
402 |
|
|
while Present (Choice) loop
|
403 |
|
|
Analyze (Choice);
|
404 |
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (Choice);
|
405 |
|
|
end loop;
|
406 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (Handler);
|
408 |
|
|
end loop;
|
409 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
-- Analyze statements in sequence
|
411 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
Analyze_Statements (Statements (N));
|
413 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
-- If the current scope is a subprogram, then this is the right place to
|
415 |
|
|
-- check for hanging useless assignments from the statement sequence of
|
416 |
|
|
-- the subprogram body.
|
417 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
if Is_Subprogram (Current_Scope) then
|
419 |
|
|
Warn_On_Useless_Assignments (Current_Scope);
|
420 |
|
|
end if;
|
421 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
-- Deal with handlers or AT END proc
|
423 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
if Present (Handlers) then
|
425 |
|
|
Analyze_Exception_Handlers (Handlers);
|
426 |
|
|
elsif Present (At_End_Proc (N)) then
|
427 |
|
|
Analyze (At_End_Proc (N));
|
428 |
|
|
end if;
|
429 |
|
|
end Analyze_Handled_Statements;
|
430 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
432 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Raise_Statement --
|
433 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
434 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Raise_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
436 |
|
|
Exception_Id : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
437 |
|
|
Exception_Name : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
438 |
|
|
P : Node_Id;
|
439 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
begin
|
441 |
|
|
Check_Unreachable_Code (N);
|
442 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
-- Check exception restrictions on the original source
|
444 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (N) then
|
446 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Exceptions, N);
|
447 |
|
|
end if;
|
448 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
-- Check for useless assignment to OUT or IN OUT scalar immediately
|
450 |
|
|
-- preceding the raise. Right now we only look at assignment statements,
|
451 |
|
|
-- we could do more.
|
452 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
if Is_List_Member (N) then
|
454 |
|
|
declare
|
455 |
|
|
P : Node_Id;
|
456 |
|
|
L : Node_Id;
|
457 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
begin
|
459 |
|
|
P := Prev (N);
|
460 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
if Present (P)
|
462 |
|
|
and then Nkind (P) = N_Assignment_Statement
|
463 |
|
|
then
|
464 |
|
|
L := Name (P);
|
465 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
if Is_Scalar_Type (Etype (L))
|
467 |
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (L)
|
468 |
|
|
and then Is_Formal (Entity (L))
|
469 |
|
|
then
|
470 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
471 |
|
|
("?assignment to pass-by-copy formal may have no effect",
|
472 |
|
|
P);
|
473 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
474 |
|
|
("\?RAISE statement may result in abnormal return" &
|
475 |
|
|
" (RM 6.4.1(17))", P);
|
476 |
|
|
end if;
|
477 |
|
|
end if;
|
478 |
|
|
end;
|
479 |
|
|
end if;
|
480 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
-- Reraise statement
|
482 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
if No (Exception_Id) then
|
484 |
|
|
P := Parent (N);
|
485 |
|
|
while not Nkind_In (P, N_Exception_Handler,
|
486 |
|
|
N_Subprogram_Body,
|
487 |
|
|
N_Package_Body,
|
488 |
|
|
N_Task_Body,
|
489 |
|
|
N_Entry_Body)
|
490 |
|
|
loop
|
491 |
|
|
P := Parent (P);
|
492 |
|
|
end loop;
|
493 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
if Nkind (P) /= N_Exception_Handler then
|
495 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
496 |
|
|
("reraise statement must appear directly in a handler", N);
|
497 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
-- If a handler has a reraise, it cannot be the target of a local
|
499 |
|
|
-- raise (goto optimization is impossible), and if the no exception
|
500 |
|
|
-- propagation restriction is set, this is a violation.
|
501 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
else
|
503 |
|
|
Set_Local_Raise_Not_OK (P);
|
504 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
-- Do not check the restriction if the reraise statement is part
|
506 |
|
|
-- of the code generated for an AT-END handler. That's because
|
507 |
|
|
-- if the restriction is actually active, we never generate this
|
508 |
|
|
-- raise anyway, so the apparent violation is bogus.
|
509 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
if not From_At_End (N) then
|
511 |
|
|
Check_Restriction (No_Exception_Propagation, N);
|
512 |
|
|
end if;
|
513 |
|
|
end if;
|
514 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
-- Normal case with exception id present
|
516 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
else
|
518 |
|
|
Analyze (Exception_Id);
|
519 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
if Is_Entity_Name (Exception_Id) then
|
521 |
|
|
Exception_Name := Entity (Exception_Id);
|
522 |
|
|
end if;
|
523 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
if No (Exception_Name)
|
525 |
|
|
or else Ekind (Exception_Name) /= E_Exception
|
526 |
|
|
then
|
527 |
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
528 |
|
|
("exception name expected in raise statement", Exception_Id);
|
529 |
|
|
else
|
530 |
|
|
Set_Is_Raised (Exception_Name);
|
531 |
|
|
end if;
|
532 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
-- Deal with RAISE WITH case
|
534 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
if Present (Expression (N)) then
|
536 |
|
|
Check_Compiler_Unit (Expression (N));
|
537 |
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Expression (N), Standard_String);
|
538 |
|
|
end if;
|
539 |
|
|
end if;
|
540 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
Kill_Current_Values (Last_Assignment_Only => True);
|
542 |
|
|
end Analyze_Raise_Statement;
|
543 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
545 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Raise_xxx_Error --
|
546 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
547 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
-- Normally, the Etype is already set (when this node is used within
|
549 |
|
|
-- an expression, since it is copied from the node which it rewrites).
|
550 |
|
|
-- If this node is used in a statement context, then we set the type
|
551 |
|
|
-- Standard_Void_Type. This is used both by Gigi and by the front end
|
552 |
|
|
-- to distinguish the statement use and the subexpression use.
|
553 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
-- The only other required processing is to take care of the Condition
|
555 |
|
|
-- field if one is present.
|
556 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Raise_xxx_Error (N : Node_Id) is
|
558 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
function Same_Expression (C1, C2 : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
560 |
|
|
-- It often occurs that two identical raise statements are generated in
|
561 |
|
|
-- succession (for example when dynamic elaboration checks take place on
|
562 |
|
|
-- separate expressions in a call). If the two statements are identical
|
563 |
|
|
-- according to the simple criterion that follows, the raise is
|
564 |
|
|
-- converted into a null statement.
|
565 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
---------------------
|
567 |
|
|
-- Same_Expression --
|
568 |
|
|
---------------------
|
569 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
function Same_Expression (C1, C2 : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
571 |
|
|
begin
|
572 |
|
|
if No (C1) and then No (C2) then
|
573 |
|
|
return True;
|
574 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (C1) and then Is_Entity_Name (C2) then
|
576 |
|
|
return Entity (C1) = Entity (C2);
|
577 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
elsif Nkind (C1) /= Nkind (C2) then
|
579 |
|
|
return False;
|
580 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
elsif Nkind (C1) in N_Unary_Op then
|
582 |
|
|
return Same_Expression (Right_Opnd (C1), Right_Opnd (C2));
|
583 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
elsif Nkind (C1) in N_Binary_Op then
|
585 |
|
|
return Same_Expression (Left_Opnd (C1), Left_Opnd (C2))
|
586 |
|
|
and then Same_Expression (Right_Opnd (C1), Right_Opnd (C2));
|
587 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
elsif Nkind (C1) = N_Null then
|
589 |
|
|
return True;
|
590 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
else
|
592 |
|
|
return False;
|
593 |
|
|
end if;
|
594 |
|
|
end Same_Expression;
|
595 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Raise_xxx_Error
|
597 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
begin
|
599 |
|
|
if No (Etype (N)) then
|
600 |
|
|
Set_Etype (N, Standard_Void_Type);
|
601 |
|
|
end if;
|
602 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
if Present (Condition (N)) then
|
604 |
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Condition (N), Standard_Boolean);
|
605 |
|
|
end if;
|
606 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
-- Deal with static cases in obvious manner
|
608 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
if Nkind (Condition (N)) = N_Identifier then
|
610 |
|
|
if Entity (Condition (N)) = Standard_True then
|
611 |
|
|
Set_Condition (N, Empty);
|
612 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
elsif Entity (Condition (N)) = Standard_False then
|
614 |
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Sloc (N)));
|
615 |
|
|
end if;
|
616 |
|
|
end if;
|
617 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
-- Remove duplicate raise statements. Note that the previous one may
|
619 |
|
|
-- already have been removed as well.
|
620 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
if not Comes_From_Source (N)
|
622 |
|
|
and then Nkind (N) /= N_Null_Statement
|
623 |
|
|
and then Is_List_Member (N)
|
624 |
|
|
and then Present (Prev (N))
|
625 |
|
|
and then Nkind (N) = Nkind (Original_Node (Prev (N)))
|
626 |
|
|
and then Same_Expression
|
627 |
|
|
(Condition (N), Condition (Original_Node (Prev (N))))
|
628 |
|
|
then
|
629 |
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Sloc (N)));
|
630 |
|
|
end if;
|
631 |
|
|
end Analyze_Raise_xxx_Error;
|
632 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
634 |
|
|
-- Analyze_Subprogram_Info --
|
635 |
|
|
-----------------------------
|
636 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_Subprogram_Info (N : Node_Id) is
|
638 |
|
|
begin
|
639 |
|
|
Set_Etype (N, RTE (RE_Code_Loc));
|
640 |
|
|
end Analyze_Subprogram_Info;
|
641 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
end Sem_Ch11;
|