1 |
281 |
jeremybenn |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 |
|
|
-- --
|
3 |
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
4 |
|
|
-- --
|
5 |
|
|
-- S E M _ R E S --
|
6 |
|
|
-- --
|
7 |
|
|
-- S p e c --
|
8 |
|
|
-- --
|
9 |
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2008, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
10 |
|
|
-- --
|
11 |
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
12 |
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
13 |
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
14 |
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
15 |
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
16 |
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
17 |
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
18 |
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
19 |
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
20 |
|
|
-- --
|
21 |
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
22 |
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
23 |
|
|
-- --
|
24 |
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
-- Resolution processing for all subexpression nodes. Note that the separate
|
27 |
|
|
-- package Sem_Aggr contains the actual resolution routines for aggregates,
|
28 |
|
|
-- which are separated off since aggregate processing is complex.
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
with Types; use Types;
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
package Sem_Res is
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
-- As described in Sem_Ch4, the type resolution proceeds in two phases.
|
35 |
|
|
-- The first phase is a bottom up pass that is achieved during the
|
36 |
|
|
-- recursive traversal performed by the Analyze procedures. This phase
|
37 |
|
|
-- determines unambiguous types, and collects sets of possible types
|
38 |
|
|
-- where the interpretation is potentially ambiguous.
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
-- On completing this bottom up pass, which corresponds to a call to
|
41 |
|
|
-- Analyze on a complete context, the Resolve routine is called which
|
42 |
|
|
-- performs a top down resolution with recursive calls to itself to
|
43 |
|
|
-- resolve operands.
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
-- Since in practice a lot of semantic analysis has to be postponed until
|
46 |
|
|
-- types are known (e.g. static folding, setting of suppress flags), the
|
47 |
|
|
-- Resolve routines also complete the semantic analysis, and call the
|
48 |
|
|
-- expander for possibly expansion of the completely type resolved node.
|
49 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
procedure Resolve (N : Node_Id; Typ : Entity_Id);
|
51 |
|
|
procedure Resolve (N : Node_Id; Typ : Entity_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
|
52 |
|
|
-- Top level type-checking procedure, called in a complete context. The
|
53 |
|
|
-- construct N, which is a subexpression, has already been analyzed, and
|
54 |
|
|
-- is required to be of type Typ given the analysis of the context (which
|
55 |
|
|
-- uses the information gathered on the bottom up phase in Analyze). The
|
56 |
|
|
-- resolve routines do various other processing, e.g. static evaluation.
|
57 |
|
|
-- If a Suppress argument is present, then the resolution is done with the
|
58 |
|
|
-- specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
procedure Resolve (N : Node_Id);
|
61 |
|
|
-- A version of Resolve where the type to be used for resolution is
|
62 |
|
|
-- taken from the Etype (N). This is commonly used in cases where the
|
63 |
|
|
-- context does not add anything and the first pass of analysis found
|
64 |
|
|
-- the correct expected type.
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
procedure Resolve_Discrete_Subtype_Indication
|
67 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
68 |
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id);
|
69 |
|
|
-- Resolve subtype indications in choices (case statements and
|
70 |
|
|
-- aggregates) and in index constraints. Note that the resulting Etype
|
71 |
|
|
-- of the subtype indication node is set to the Etype of the contained
|
72 |
|
|
-- range (i.e. an Itype is not constructed for the actual subtype).
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
procedure Resolve_Entry (Entry_Name : Node_Id);
|
75 |
|
|
-- Find name of entry being called, and resolve prefix of name with its
|
76 |
|
|
-- own type. For now we assume that the prefix cannot be overloaded and
|
77 |
|
|
-- the name of the entry plays no role in the resolution.
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_And_Resolve (N : Node_Id);
|
80 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_And_Resolve (N : Node_Id; Typ : Entity_Id);
|
81 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_And_Resolve
|
82 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
83 |
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id;
|
84 |
|
|
Suppress : Check_Id);
|
85 |
|
|
procedure Analyze_And_Resolve
|
86 |
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
87 |
|
|
Suppress : Check_Id);
|
88 |
|
|
-- These routines combine the effect of Analyze and Resolve. If a Suppress
|
89 |
|
|
-- argument is present, then the analysis is done with the specified check
|
90 |
|
|
-- suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks). These checks are
|
91 |
|
|
-- suppressed for both the analysis and resolution. If the type argument
|
92 |
|
|
-- is not present, then the Etype of the expression after the Analyze
|
93 |
|
|
-- call is used for the Resolve.
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
procedure Ambiguous_Character (C : Node_Id);
|
96 |
|
|
-- Give list of candidate interpretations when a character literal cannot
|
97 |
|
|
-- be resolved, for example in a (useless) comparison such as 'A' = 'B'.
|
98 |
|
|
-- In Ada95 the literals in question can be of type Character or Wide_
|
99 |
|
|
-- Character. In Ada2005 Wide_Wide_Character is also a candidate. The
|
100 |
|
|
-- node may also be overloaded with user-defined character types.
|
101 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
procedure Check_Parameterless_Call (N : Node_Id);
|
103 |
|
|
-- Several forms of names can denote calls to entities without para-
|
104 |
|
|
-- meters. The context determines whether the name denotes the entity
|
105 |
|
|
-- or a call to it. When it is a call, the node must be rebuilt
|
106 |
|
|
-- accordingly and reanalyzed to obtain possible interpretations.
|
107 |
|
|
--
|
108 |
|
|
-- The name may be that of an overloadable construct, or it can be an
|
109 |
|
|
-- explicit dereference of a prefix that denotes an access to subprogram.
|
110 |
|
|
-- In that case, we want to convert the name into a call only if the
|
111 |
|
|
-- context requires the return type of the subprogram. Finally, a
|
112 |
|
|
-- parameterless protected subprogram appears as a selected component.
|
113 |
|
|
--
|
114 |
|
|
-- The parameter T is the Typ for the corresponding resolve call.
|
115 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
procedure Preanalyze_And_Resolve (N : Node_Id; T : Entity_Id);
|
117 |
|
|
-- Performs a pre-analysis of expression node N. During pre-analysis,
|
118 |
|
|
-- N is analyzed and then resolved against type T, but no expansion
|
119 |
|
|
-- is carried out for N or its children. For more info on pre-analysis
|
120 |
|
|
-- read the spec of Sem.
|
121 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
procedure Preanalyze_And_Resolve (N : Node_Id);
|
123 |
|
|
-- Same, but use type of node because context does not impose a single type
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
private
|
126 |
|
|
procedure Resolve_Implicit_Type (N : Node_Id) renames Resolve;
|
127 |
|
|
pragma Inline (Resolve_Implicit_Type);
|
128 |
|
|
-- We use this renaming to make the application of Inline very explicit
|
129 |
|
|
-- to this version, since other versions of Resolve are not inlined.
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
end Sem_Res;
|