1 |
284 |
jeremybenn |
@c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
|
2 |
|
|
@c 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
3 |
|
|
@c This is part of the GCC manual.
|
4 |
|
|
@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
@node Interface
|
7 |
|
|
@chapter Interfacing to GCC Output
|
8 |
|
|
@cindex interfacing to GCC output
|
9 |
|
|
@cindex run-time conventions
|
10 |
|
|
@cindex function call conventions
|
11 |
|
|
@cindex conventions, run-time
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
GCC is normally configured to use the same function calling convention
|
14 |
|
|
normally in use on the target system. This is done with the
|
15 |
|
|
machine-description macros described (@pxref{Target Macros}).
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
@cindex unions, returning
|
18 |
|
|
@cindex structures, returning
|
19 |
|
|
@cindex returning structures and unions
|
20 |
|
|
However, returning of structure and union values is done differently on
|
21 |
|
|
some target machines. As a result, functions compiled with PCC
|
22 |
|
|
returning such types cannot be called from code compiled with GCC,
|
23 |
|
|
and vice versa. This does not cause trouble often because few Unix
|
24 |
|
|
library routines return structures or unions.
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
GCC code returns structures and unions that are 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes
|
27 |
|
|
long in the same registers used for @code{int} or @code{double} return
|
28 |
|
|
values. (GCC typically allocates variables of such types in
|
29 |
|
|
registers also.) Structures and unions of other sizes are returned by
|
30 |
|
|
storing them into an address passed by the caller (usually in a
|
31 |
|
|
register). The target hook @code{TARGET_STRUCT_VALUE_RTX}
|
32 |
|
|
tells GCC where to pass this address.
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
By contrast, PCC on most target machines returns structures and unions
|
35 |
|
|
of any size by copying the data into an area of static storage, and then
|
36 |
|
|
returning the address of that storage as if it were a pointer value.
|
37 |
|
|
The caller must copy the data from that memory area to the place where
|
38 |
|
|
the value is wanted. This is slower than the method used by GCC, and
|
39 |
|
|
fails to be reentrant.
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
On some target machines, such as RISC machines and the 80386, the
|
42 |
|
|
standard system convention is to pass to the subroutine the address of
|
43 |
|
|
where to return the value. On these machines, GCC has been
|
44 |
|
|
configured to be compatible with the standard compiler, when this method
|
45 |
|
|
is used. It may not be compatible for structures of 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes.
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
@cindex argument passing
|
48 |
|
|
@cindex passing arguments
|
49 |
|
|
GCC uses the system's standard convention for passing arguments. On
|
50 |
|
|
some machines, the first few arguments are passed in registers; in
|
51 |
|
|
others, all are passed on the stack. It would be possible to use
|
52 |
|
|
registers for argument passing on any machine, and this would probably
|
53 |
|
|
result in a significant speedup. But the result would be complete
|
54 |
|
|
incompatibility with code that follows the standard convention. So this
|
55 |
|
|
change is practical only if you are switching to GCC as the sole C
|
56 |
|
|
compiler for the system. We may implement register argument passing on
|
57 |
|
|
certain machines once we have a complete GNU system so that we can
|
58 |
|
|
compile the libraries with GCC@.
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
On some machines (particularly the SPARC), certain types of arguments
|
61 |
|
|
are passed ``by invisible reference''. This means that the value is
|
62 |
|
|
stored in memory, and the address of the memory location is passed to
|
63 |
|
|
the subroutine.
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
@cindex @code{longjmp} and automatic variables
|
66 |
|
|
If you use @code{longjmp}, beware of automatic variables. ISO C says that
|
67 |
|
|
automatic variables that are not declared @code{volatile} have undefined
|
68 |
|
|
values after a @code{longjmp}. And this is all GCC promises to do,
|
69 |
|
|
because it is very difficult to restore register variables correctly, and
|
70 |
|
|
one of GCC's features is that it can put variables in registers without
|
71 |
|
|
your asking it to.
|