OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_me/openrisc_me/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc_me

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-src/] [gcc-4.5.1/] [libstdc++-v3/] [doc/] [html/] [manual/] [appendix_free.html] - Blame information for rev 424

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 424 jeremybenn
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
2
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>Appendix C.  Free Software Needs Free Documentation</title><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.75.2" /><meta name="keywords" content="&#10;      ISO C++&#10;    , &#10;      library&#10;    " /><link rel="home" href="../spine.html" title="The GNU C++ Library Documentation" /><link rel="up" href="spine.html" title="The GNU C++ Library" /><link rel="prev" href="backwards.html" title="Backwards Compatibility" /><link rel="next" href="appendix_gpl.html" title="Appendix D.  GNU General Public License version 3" /></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Appendix C. 
4
  Free Software Needs Free Documentation
5
 
6
</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="backwards.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">The GNU C++ Library</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="appendix_gpl.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="appendix" title="Appendix C.  Free Software Needs Free Documentation"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title"><a id="appendix.free"></a>Appendix C. 
7
  Free Software Needs Free Documentation
8
  <a id="id702684" class="indexterm"></a>
9
</h2></div></div></div><p>
10
The biggest deficiency in free operating systems is not in the
11
software--it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include in
12
these systems.  Many of our most important programs do not come with
13
full manuals.  Documentation is an essential part of any software
14
package; when an important free software package does not come with a
15
free manual, that is a major gap.  We have many such gaps today.
16
</p><p>
17
Once upon a time, many years ago, I thought I would learn Perl.  I got
18
a copy of a free manual, but I found it hard to read.  When I asked
19
Perl users about alternatives, they told me that there were better
20
introductory manuals--but those were not free.
21
</p><p>
22
Why was this?  The authors of the good manuals had written them for
23
O'Reilly Associates, which published them with restrictive terms--no
24
copying, no modification, source files not available--which exclude
25
them from the free software community.
26
</p><p>
27
That wasn't the first time this sort of thing has happened, and (to
28
our community's great loss) it was far from the last.  Proprietary
29
manual publishers have enticed a great many authors to restrict their
30
manuals since then.  Many times I have heard a GNU user eagerly tell
31
me about a manual that he is writing, with which he expects to help
32
the GNU project--and then had my hopes dashed, as he proceeded to
33
explain that he had signed a contract with a publisher that would
34
restrict it so that we cannot use it.
35
</p><p>
36
Given that writing good English is a rare skill among programmers, we
37
can ill afford to lose manuals this way.
38
</p><p>
39
  Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom,
40
not price.  The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
41
Associates charged a price for printed copies--that in itself is fine.
42
(The Free Software Foundation <a class="ulink" href="http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html" target="_top">sells printed copies</a> of
43
free GNU manuals, too.)  But GNU manuals are available in source code
44
form, while these manuals are available only on paper.  GNU manuals
45
come with permission to copy and modify; the Perl manuals do not.
46
These restrictions are the problems.
47
</p><p>
48
The criterion for a free manual is pretty much the same as for free
49
software: it is a matter of giving all users certain freedoms.
50
Redistribution (including commercial redistribution) must be
51
permitted, so that the manual can accompany every copy of the program,
52
on-line or on paper.  Permission for modification is crucial too.
53
</p><p>
54
As a general rule, I don't believe that it is essential for people to
55
have permission to modify all sorts of articles and books.  The issues
56
for writings are not necessarily the same as those for software.  For
57
example, I don't think you or I are obliged to give permission to
58
modify articles like this one, which describe our actions and our
59
views.
60
</p><p>
61
But there is a particular reason why the freedom to modify is crucial
62
for documentation for free software.  When people exercise their right
63
to modify the software, and add or change its features, if they are
64
conscientious they will change the manual too--so they can provide
65
accurate and usable documentation with the modified program.  A manual
66
which forbids programmers to be conscientious and finish the job, or
67
more precisely requires them to write a new manual from scratch if
68
they change the program, does not fill our community's needs.
69
</p><p>
70
While a blanket prohibition on modification is unacceptable, some
71
kinds of limits on the method of modification pose no problem.  For
72
example, requirements to preserve the original author's copyright
73
notice, the distribution terms, or the list of authors, are ok.  It is
74
also no problem to require modified versions to include notice that
75
they were modified, even to have entire sections that may not be
76
deleted or changed, as long as these sections deal with nontechnical
77
topics.  (Some GNU manuals have them.)
78
</p><p>
79
These kinds of restrictions are not a problem because, as a practical
80
matter, they don't stop the conscientious programmer from adapting the
81
manual to fit the modified program.  In other words, they don't block
82
the free software community from making full use of the manual.
83
</p><p>
84
However, it must be possible to modify all the <span class="emphasis"><em>technical</em></span>
85
content of the manual, and then distribute the result in all the usual
86
media, through all the usual channels; otherwise, the restrictions do
87
block the community, the manual is not free, and so we need another
88
manual.
89
</p><p>
90
Unfortunately, it is often hard to find someone to write another
91
manual when a proprietary manual exists.  The obstacle is that many
92
users think that a proprietary manual is good enough--so they don't
93
see the need to write a free manual.  They do not see that the free
94
operating system has a gap that needs filling.
95
</p><p>
96
Why do users think that proprietary manuals are good enough?  Some
97
have not considered the issue.  I hope this article will do something
98
to change that.
99
</p><p>
100
Other users consider proprietary manuals acceptable for the same
101
reason so many people consider proprietary software acceptable: they
102
judge in purely practical terms, not using freedom as a criterion.
103
These people are entitled to their opinions, but since those opinions
104
spring from values which do not include freedom, they are no guide for
105
those of us who do value freedom.
106
</p><p>
107
Please spread the word about this issue.  We continue to lose manuals
108
to proprietary publishing.  If we spread the word that proprietary
109
manuals are not sufficient, perhaps the next person who wants to help
110
GNU by writing documentation will realize, before it is too late, that
111
he must above all make it free.
112
</p><p>
113
We can also encourage commercial publishers to sell free, copylefted
114
manuals instead of proprietary ones.  One way you can help this is to
115
check the distribution terms of a manual before you buy it, and
116
prefer copylefted manuals to non-copylefted ones.
117
</p><p>
118
[Note: We now maintain a <a class="ulink" href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/doc/other-free-books.html" target="_top">web page
119
that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].
120
</p><p>Copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA</p><p>Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are
121
permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this
122
notice is preserved.</p><p>Report any problems or suggestions to <code class="email">&lt;<a class="email" href="mailto:webmaster@fsf.org">webmaster@fsf.org</a>&gt;</code>.</p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="backwards.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="spine.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="appendix_gpl.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Backwards Compatibility </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../spine.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Appendix D. 
123
    <acronym class="acronym">GNU</acronym> General Public License version 3
124
  </td></tr></table></div></body></html>

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.