OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_me/openrisc_me/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc_me

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-src/] [gdb-6.8/] [gdb/] [testsuite/] [gdb.base/] [structs.exp] - Blame information for rev 321

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 24 jeremybenn
# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
 
3
# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008
4
# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5
 
6
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
8
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
9
# (at your option) any later version.
10
#
11
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
14
# GNU General Public License for more details.
15
#
16
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
17
# along with this program.  If not, see .
18
 
19
# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
20
# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
21
 
22
if $tracelevel then {
23
        strace $tracelevel
24
}
25
 
26
set prms_id 0
27
set bug_id 0
28
 
29
# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
30
# test.
31
 
32
if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
33
    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
34
    fail "This target can not call functions"
35
    continue
36
}
37
 
38
set testfile "structs"
39
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
40
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
41
 
42
# Create and source the file that provides information about the
43
# compiler used to compile the test case.
44
 
45
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
46
    return -1;
47
}
48
 
49
# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
50
# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
51
# the last TYPES field).  Run the compmiled program up to "main".
52
# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
53
 
54
proc start_structs_test { types } {
55
    global testfile
56
    global srcfile
57
    global binfile
58
    global objdir
59
    global subdir
60
    global srcdir
61
    global gdb_prompt
62
 
63
    # Create the additional flags
64
    set flags "debug"
65
    set testfile "structs"
66
    set n 0
67
    for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
68
        set m [I2A ${n}]
69
        set t [lindex ${types} $n]
70
        lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
71
        append testfile "-" "$t"
72
    }
73
 
74
    set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
75
    if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
76
        # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
77
        warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
78
        if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
79
            untested structs.exp
80
            return -1
81
        }
82
    }
83
 
84
    # Start with a fresh gdb.
85
    gdb_exit
86
    gdb_start
87
    gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
88
    gdb_load ${binfile}
89
 
90
    # Make certain that the output is consistent
91
    gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
92
            "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
93
    gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
94
            "set print address off; ${testfile}"
95
    gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
96
            "set width 0; ${testfile}"
97
 
98
    # Advance to main
99
    if { ![runto_main] } then {
100
        gdb_suppress_tests;
101
    }
102
 
103
    # Get the debug format
104
    get_debug_format
105
 
106
    # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
107
    set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
108
    for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
109
        append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
110
    }
111
    append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
112
    gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
113
            "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
114
}
115
 
116
# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}.  First element is
117
# empty to make indexing easier.  "foo" returns the modified value,
118
# "zed" returns the invalid value.
119
 
120
proc foo { n } {
121
    return [lindex {
122
        "{}"
123
        "{a = 49 '1'}"
124
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
125
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
126
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
127
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
128
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
129
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
130
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
131
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
132
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
133
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
134
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
135
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
136
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
137
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
138
        "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
139
        "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
140
    } $n]
141
}
142
 
143
proc zed { n } {
144
    return [lindex {
145
        "{}"
146
        "{a = 90 'Z'}"
147
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
148
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
149
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
150
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
151
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
152
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
153
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
154
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
155
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
156
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
157
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
158
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
159
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
160
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
161
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
162
        "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
163
    } $n]
164
}
165
 
166
proc any { n } {
167
    return [lindex {
168
        "{}"
169
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*}"
170
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*}"
171
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*}"
172
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*}"
173
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*}"
174
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*}"
175
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*}"
176
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*}"
177
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*}"
178
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*}"
179
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*}"
180
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*}"
181
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*}"
182
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*}"
183
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*}"
184
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*}"
185
        "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*, q = \[^,\}\]*}"
186
    } $n]
187
}
188
 
189
# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
190
# or upper case.  This is ment to be i18n proof.
191
 
192
proc i2a { n } {
193
    return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
194
}
195
 
196
proc I2A { n } {
197
    return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
198
}
199
 
200
 
201
# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
202
 
203
proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
204
    global testfile
205
    if [string match $file $testfile] {
206
        foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
207
    }
208
}
209
 
210
proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
211
    global testfile
212
    if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler]  && [test_debug_format $format]} {
213
        foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
214
    }
215
}
216
 
217
# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
218
# returning (or passing in a single structs.
219
 
220
# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
221
# for the test case.  FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
222
# this test.
223
 
224
#  start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
225
# specified combination of types for those elements.  To ensure
226
# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
227
 
228
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
229
# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
230
 
231
proc test_struct_calls { n } {
232
    global testfile
233
    global gdb_prompt
234
 
235
    # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
236
    # inferior function call.  Since GDB always knows the location of an
237
    # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
238
 
239
    # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
240
    # examining the return value printed by GDB.
241
 
242
    set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
243
 
244
    # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
245
    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
246
    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
247
    gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()"  "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun(); ${tests}"
248
 
249
    # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
250
    # This test can never fail.
251
 
252
    # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
253
    # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N".  GDB then
254
    # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
255
 
256
    gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun(foo); ${tests}"
257
    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
258
    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
259
    gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L; ${tests}"
260
}
261
 
262
# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
263
# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
264
# return-value.
265
 
266
# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
267
# values.  There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
268
# memory.  For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
269
# failure is "expected".  However GDB must still both return the
270
# function and display the final source and line information.
271
 
272
# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
273
# for the test case.  FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
274
# this test.
275
 
276
# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
277
# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
278
# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
279
# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location).  The test
280
# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
281
# are consistent.  GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
282
# other.
283
 
284
proc test_struct_returns { n } {
285
    global gdb_prompt
286
    global testfile
287
 
288
    set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
289
 
290
 
291
    # Check that "return" works.
292
 
293
    # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
294
    # a struct result.  Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
295
    # possible to store the return value in a register.
296
 
297
    # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()".  The test forces
298
    # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value.  Since that code
299
    # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
300
    # is tested by examining "L{n}".  This assumes that the
301
    # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
302
    # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged.  Also check for
303
    # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
304
 
305
    # Get into a call of fun${n}
306
    gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
307
            "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
308
            "advance to fun for return; ${tests}"
309
 
310
    # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
311
    gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L for return; ${tests}"
312
 
313
    # Force the "return".  This checks that the return is always
314
    # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
315
    # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
316
    # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
317
    # the frame ("No frame").
318
 
319
    # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
320
    # entire operation.  The value returned is checked further down.
321
    # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
322
    # the return value was located.
323
 
324
    set test "return foo; ${tests}"
325
    set return_value_known 1
326
    set return_value_unimplemented 0
327
    gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
328
        -re "The location" {
329
            # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
330
            set return_value_known 0
331
            exp_continue
332
        }
333
        -re "A structure or union" {
334
            # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
335
            set return_value_known 0
336
            # Double ulgh.  Architecture doesn't use return_value and
337
            # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
338
            set return_value_unimplemented 1
339
            exp_continue
340
        }
341
        -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
342
            gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
343
                -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
344
                    # Need to step off the function call
345
                    gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
346
                }
347
                -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
348
                    pass "${test}"
349
                }
350
            }
351
        }
352
    }
353
 
354
    # Check that the return-value is as expected.  At this stage we're
355
    # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
356
    # "return_value_known" set above.
357
    #
358
    # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
359
    # assumptions at all about the value L:
360
    #
361
    # - If the caller passed the address of L directly as fun's
362
    #   return value buffer, then L will be unchanged, because we
363
    #   forced fun to return before it could store anything in it.
364
    #
365
    # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
366
    #   fun, and then copied the buffer into L, then L will
367
    #   have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
368
    #   uninitialized buffer.
369
    #
370
    # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
371
    #   "right" value of foo in it, then L will, in fact, have
372
    #   the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
373
    #   This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
374
    #
375
    # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
376
    # true.
377
 
378
    set test "value foo returned; ${tests}"
379
    gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
380
        -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
381
            # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
382
            # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
383
            # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
384
            pass "${test}"
385
        }
386
        -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
387
            if $return_value_known {
388
                # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
389
                # the location of the return value.
390
                fail "${test}"
391
            } else {
392
                # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
393
                # answer is acceptable.
394
                pass "${test}"
395
            }
396
        }
397
        -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
398
            if $return_value_unimplemented {
399
                # What a suprize.  The architecture hasn't implemented
400
                # return_value, and hence has to fail.
401
                kfail "$test" gdb/1444
402
            } else {
403
                fail "$test"
404
            }
405
        }
406
    }
407
 
408
    # Check that a "finish" works.
409
 
410
    # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
411
    # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
412
 
413
    # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()".  The program is
414
    # advanced into a call to  "fun{n}" and then that function is
415
    # finished.  The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
416
    # "p/c", is checked.
417
 
418
    # Get into "fun${n}()".
419
    gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
420
            "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
421
            "advance to fun for finish; ${tests}"
422
 
423
    # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
424
    gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L for finish; ${tests}"
425
 
426
    # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
427
    # the return-value was found.
428
 
429
    set test "finish foo; ${tests}"
430
    set finish_value_known 1
431
    gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
432
        -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
433
            pass "${test}"
434
        }
435
        -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
436
            # Expected bad value.  For the moment this is ok.
437
            set finish_value_known 0
438
            pass "${test}"
439
        }
440
    }
441
 
442
    # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
443
    # "p/c".  If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
444
    # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
445
    set test "value foo finished; ${tests}"
446
    gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
447
        -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
448
            if $finish_value_known {
449
                pass "${test}"
450
            } else {
451
                # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
452
                # know the location of the return-value.
453
                fail "${test}"
454
            }
455
        }
456
        -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
457
            # The value didn't get found.  This is "expected".
458
            if $finish_value_known {
459
                # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
460
                # know the location of the return-value.
461
                fail "${test}"
462
            } else {
463
                pass "${test}"
464
            }
465
        }
466
    }
467
 
468
    # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
469
    # behavior.
470
 
471
    # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
472
    # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
473
    # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
474
    # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
475
    # reverse).
476
 
477
    set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
478
    if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
479
        kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
480
    } else {
481
        pass "${test}"
482
    }
483
}
484
 
485
# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
486
# randomly use register and/and structure conventions.  Check all
487
# possible sized char structs in that range.  But only a restricted
488
# range of the other types.
489
 
490
# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
491
 
492
# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory.  2 or more char
493
# structs go in memory.  Everything else is in a register!
494
 
495
# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size.  This is what the
496
# original "structs" test was doing.
497
 
498
start_structs_test { tc }
499
test_struct_calls 1
500
test_struct_calls 2
501
test_struct_calls 3
502
test_struct_calls 4
503
test_struct_calls 5
504
test_struct_calls 6
505
test_struct_calls 7
506
test_struct_calls 8
507
test_struct_calls 9
508
test_struct_calls 10
509
test_struct_calls 11
510
test_struct_calls 12
511
test_struct_calls 13
512
test_struct_calls 14
513
test_struct_calls 15
514
test_struct_calls 16
515
test_struct_calls 17
516
test_struct_returns 1
517
test_struct_returns 2
518
test_struct_returns 3
519
test_struct_returns 4
520
test_struct_returns 5
521
test_struct_returns 6
522
test_struct_returns 7
523
test_struct_returns 8
524
 
525
 
526
# Let the fun begin.
527
 
528
# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
529
# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct.  For
530
# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
531
# returns" test up to that boundary.
532
 
533
# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
534
# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
535
 
536
# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
537
# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
538
# naturally aligned.  Padding being added where needed.  Note that
539
# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
540
# tl=8.
541
 
542
# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
543
start_structs_test { ts }
544
test_struct_calls 1
545
test_struct_calls 2
546
test_struct_calls 3
547
test_struct_calls 4
548
test_struct_calls 5
549
test_struct_returns 1
550
test_struct_returns 2
551
test_struct_returns 3
552
test_struct_returns 4
553
 
554
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
555
start_structs_test { ti }
556
test_struct_calls 1
557
test_struct_calls 2
558
test_struct_calls 3
559
test_struct_returns 1
560
test_struct_returns 2
561
 
562
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
563
start_structs_test { tl }
564
test_struct_calls 1
565
test_struct_calls 2
566
test_struct_calls 3
567
test_struct_returns 1
568
test_struct_returns 2
569
 
570
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
571
start_structs_test { tll }
572
test_struct_calls 1
573
test_struct_calls 2
574
test_struct_returns 1
575
 
576
# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
577
start_structs_test { tf }
578
test_struct_calls 1
579
test_struct_calls 2
580
test_struct_calls 3
581
test_struct_returns 1
582
test_struct_returns 2
583
 
584
# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
585
start_structs_test { td }
586
test_struct_calls 1
587
test_struct_calls 2
588
test_struct_returns 1
589
 
590
# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
591
start_structs_test { tld }
592
test_struct_calls 1
593
test_struct_calls 2
594
test_struct_returns 1
595
 
596
# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
597
start_structs_test { ts tc }
598
test_struct_calls 2
599
test_struct_calls 3
600
test_struct_calls 4
601
test_struct_calls 5
602
test_struct_calls 6
603
test_struct_calls 7
604
test_struct_calls 8
605
test_struct_returns 2
606
 
607
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
608
start_structs_test { ti tc }
609
test_struct_calls 2
610
test_struct_calls 3
611
test_struct_calls 4
612
test_struct_calls 5
613
test_struct_calls 6
614
test_struct_returns 2
615
 
616
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
617
start_structs_test { tl tc }
618
test_struct_calls 2
619
test_struct_calls 3
620
test_struct_calls 4
621
test_struct_calls 5
622
test_struct_calls 6
623
test_struct_returns 2
624
 
625
# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
626
start_structs_test { tll tc }
627
test_struct_calls 2
628
 
629
# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
630
start_structs_test { tf tc }
631
test_struct_calls 2
632
test_struct_calls 3
633
test_struct_calls 4
634
test_struct_calls 5
635
test_struct_calls 6
636
test_struct_returns 2
637
 
638
# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
639
start_structs_test { td tc }
640
test_struct_calls 2
641
 
642
# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
643
start_structs_test { tld tc }
644
test_struct_calls 2
645
 
646
# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
647
start_structs_test { tc ts }
648
test_struct_calls 2
649
test_struct_calls 3
650
test_struct_calls 4
651
test_struct_calls 5
652
test_struct_calls 6
653
test_struct_returns 2
654
 
655
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
656
start_structs_test { tc ti }
657
test_struct_calls 2
658
test_struct_calls 3
659
test_struct_calls 4
660
test_struct_returns 2
661
 
662
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
663
start_structs_test { tc tl }
664
test_struct_calls 2
665
test_struct_calls 3
666
test_struct_calls 4
667
test_struct_returns 2
668
 
669
# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
670
start_structs_test { tc tll }
671
test_struct_calls 2
672
 
673
# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
674
start_structs_test { tc tf }
675
test_struct_calls 2
676
test_struct_calls 3
677
test_struct_calls 4
678
 
679
# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
680
start_structs_test { tc td }
681
test_struct_calls 2
682
 
683
# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
684
start_structs_test { tc tld }
685
test_struct_calls 2
686
 
687
# Some float combinations
688
 
689
# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
690
# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
691
start_structs_test { td tf }
692
test_struct_calls 2
693
test_struct_returns 2
694
 
695
# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
696
# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
697
start_structs_test { tf td }
698
test_struct_calls 2
699
test_struct_returns 2
700
 
701
return 0

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.