1 |
330 |
jeremybenn |
# Copyright 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
|
2 |
|
|
# 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
5 |
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
6 |
|
|
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
7 |
|
|
# (at your option) any later version.
|
8 |
|
|
#
|
9 |
|
|
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
10 |
|
|
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
11 |
|
|
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
12 |
|
|
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
13 |
|
|
#
|
14 |
|
|
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
15 |
|
|
# along with this program. If not, see .
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
# This file was written by Fred Fish. (fnf@cygnus.com)
|
18 |
|
|
# And rewritten by Michael Chastain .
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
set nl "\[\r\n\]+"
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
if $tracelevel then {
|
23 |
|
|
strace $tracelevel
|
24 |
|
|
}
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
load_lib "cp-support.exp"
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
set testfile "classes"
|
31 |
|
|
set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
|
32 |
|
|
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
|
35 |
|
|
untested classes.exp
|
36 |
|
|
return -1
|
37 |
|
|
}
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
# Test ptype of class objects.
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
proc test_ptype_class_objects {} {
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
# Simple type.
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
46 |
|
|
"ptype struct default_public_struct" "" "struct" "default_public_struct" \
|
47 |
|
|
{
|
48 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
49 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
50 |
|
|
}
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
55 |
|
|
"ptype struct explicit_public_struct" "" "struct" "explicit_public_struct" \
|
56 |
|
|
{
|
57 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
58 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
59 |
|
|
}
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
64 |
|
|
"ptype struct protected_struct" "" "struct" "protected_struct" \
|
65 |
|
|
{
|
66 |
|
|
{ field protected "int a;" }
|
67 |
|
|
{ field protected "int b;" }
|
68 |
|
|
}
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
71 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
73 |
|
|
"ptype struct private_struct" "" "struct" "private_struct" \
|
74 |
|
|
{
|
75 |
|
|
{ field private "int a;" }
|
76 |
|
|
{ field private "int b;" }
|
77 |
|
|
}
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
# A bigger type.
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
82 |
|
|
"ptype struct mixed_protection_struct" "" "struct" "mixed_protection_struct" \
|
83 |
|
|
{
|
84 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
85 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
86 |
|
|
{ field private "int c;" }
|
87 |
|
|
{ field private "int d;" }
|
88 |
|
|
{ field protected "int e;" }
|
89 |
|
|
{ field protected "int f;" }
|
90 |
|
|
{ field public "int g;" }
|
91 |
|
|
{ field private "int h;" }
|
92 |
|
|
{ field protected "int i;" }
|
93 |
|
|
}
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
# All that again with "class" instead of "struct".
|
96 |
|
|
# gdb does not care about the difference anyways.
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
99 |
|
|
"ptype class public_class" "" "class" "public_class" \
|
100 |
|
|
{
|
101 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
102 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
103 |
|
|
}
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
108 |
|
|
"ptype class protected_class" "" "class" "protected_class" \
|
109 |
|
|
{
|
110 |
|
|
{ field protected "int a;" }
|
111 |
|
|
{ field protected "int b;" }
|
112 |
|
|
}
|
113 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
115 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
117 |
|
|
"ptype class default_private_class" "" "class" "default_private_class" \
|
118 |
|
|
{
|
119 |
|
|
{ field private "int a;" }
|
120 |
|
|
{ field private "int b;" }
|
121 |
|
|
}
|
122 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
# Another simple type.
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
126 |
|
|
"ptype class explicit_private_class" "" "class" "explicit_private_class" \
|
127 |
|
|
{
|
128 |
|
|
{ field private "int a;" }
|
129 |
|
|
{ field private "int b;" }
|
130 |
|
|
}
|
131 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
# A bigger type.
|
133 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
135 |
|
|
"ptype class mixed_protection_class" "" "class" "mixed_protection_class" \
|
136 |
|
|
{
|
137 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
139 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
140 |
|
|
{ field private "int c;" }
|
141 |
|
|
{ field private "int d;" }
|
142 |
|
|
{ field protected "int e;" }
|
143 |
|
|
{ field protected "int f;" }
|
144 |
|
|
{ field public "int g;" }
|
145 |
|
|
{ field private "int h;" }
|
146 |
|
|
{ field protected "int i;" }
|
147 |
|
|
}
|
148 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
# Here are some classes with inheritance.
|
150 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
# Base class.
|
152 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
154 |
|
|
"ptype class A" "" "class" "A" \
|
155 |
|
|
{
|
156 |
|
|
{ field public "int a;" }
|
157 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
158 |
|
|
}
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
# Derived class.
|
161 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
163 |
|
|
"ptype class B" "" "class" "B" \
|
164 |
|
|
{
|
165 |
|
|
{ base "public A" }
|
166 |
|
|
{ field public "int b;" }
|
167 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
168 |
|
|
}
|
169 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
# Derived class.
|
171 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
173 |
|
|
"ptype class C" "" "class" "C" \
|
174 |
|
|
{
|
175 |
|
|
{ base "public A" }
|
176 |
|
|
{ field public "int c;" }
|
177 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
178 |
|
|
}
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
# Derived class, multiple inheritance.
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
183 |
|
|
"ptype class D" "" "class" "D" \
|
184 |
|
|
{
|
185 |
|
|
{ base "public B" }
|
186 |
|
|
{ base "public C" }
|
187 |
|
|
{ field public "int d;" }
|
188 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
189 |
|
|
}
|
190 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
# Derived class.
|
192 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
194 |
|
|
"ptype class E" "" "class" "E" \
|
195 |
|
|
{
|
196 |
|
|
{ base "public D" }
|
197 |
|
|
{ field public "int e;" }
|
198 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
199 |
|
|
}
|
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
# This is a break from inheritance tests.
|
202 |
|
|
#
|
203 |
|
|
# gcc 2.X with stabs (stabs or stabs+?) used to have a problem with
|
204 |
|
|
# static methods whose name is the same as their argument mangling.
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
207 |
|
|
"ptype class Static" "" "class" "Static" \
|
208 |
|
|
{
|
209 |
|
|
{ method public "static void ii(int, int);" }
|
210 |
|
|
}
|
211 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
# Here are some virtual inheritance tests.
|
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
# A virtual base class.
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
217 |
|
|
"ptype class vA" "" "class" "vA" \
|
218 |
|
|
{
|
219 |
|
|
{ field public "int va;" }
|
220 |
|
|
{ field public "int vx;" }
|
221 |
|
|
}
|
222 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
# A derived class with a virtual base.
|
224 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
226 |
|
|
"ptype class vB" "" "class" "vB" \
|
227 |
|
|
{
|
228 |
|
|
{ base "public virtual vA" }
|
229 |
|
|
{ vbase "vA" }
|
230 |
|
|
{ field public "int vb;" }
|
231 |
|
|
{ field public "int vx;" }
|
232 |
|
|
}
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
# Another derived class with a virtual base.
|
235 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
237 |
|
|
"ptype class vC" "" "class" "vC" \
|
238 |
|
|
{
|
239 |
|
|
{ base "public virtual vA" }
|
240 |
|
|
{ vbase "vA" }
|
241 |
|
|
{ field public "int vc;" }
|
242 |
|
|
{ field public "int vx;" }
|
243 |
|
|
}
|
244 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
# A classic diamond class.
|
246 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
248 |
|
|
"ptype class vD" "" "class" "vD" \
|
249 |
|
|
{
|
250 |
|
|
{ base "public virtual vB" }
|
251 |
|
|
{ base "public virtual vC" }
|
252 |
|
|
{ vbase "vC" }
|
253 |
|
|
{ vbase "vB" }
|
254 |
|
|
{ field public "int vd;" }
|
255 |
|
|
{ field public "int vx;" }
|
256 |
|
|
}
|
257 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
# A class derived from a diamond class.
|
259 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
261 |
|
|
"ptype class vE" "" "class" "vE" \
|
262 |
|
|
{
|
263 |
|
|
{ base "public virtual vD" }
|
264 |
|
|
{ vbase "vD" }
|
265 |
|
|
{ field public "int ve;" }
|
266 |
|
|
{ field public "int vx;" }
|
267 |
|
|
}
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
# Another inheritance series.
|
270 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
# A base class.
|
272 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
274 |
|
|
"ptype class Base1" "" "class" "Base1" \
|
275 |
|
|
{
|
276 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
277 |
|
|
{ method public "Base1(int);" }
|
278 |
|
|
}
|
279 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
# Another base class.
|
281 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
283 |
|
|
"ptype class Foo" "" "class" "Foo" \
|
284 |
|
|
{
|
285 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
286 |
|
|
{ field public "int y;" }
|
287 |
|
|
{ field public "static int st;" }
|
288 |
|
|
{ method public "Foo(int, int);" }
|
289 |
|
|
{ method public "int operator!();" }
|
290 |
|
|
{ method public "operator int();" }
|
291 |
|
|
{ method public "int times(int);" }
|
292 |
|
|
} \
|
293 |
|
|
"" \
|
294 |
|
|
{
|
295 |
|
|
{
|
296 |
|
|
"operator int();"
|
297 |
|
|
"int operator int();"
|
298 |
|
|
{ setup_kfail "gdb/1497" "*-*-*" }
|
299 |
|
|
}
|
300 |
|
|
{
|
301 |
|
|
"operator int();"
|
302 |
|
|
"int operator int(void);"
|
303 |
|
|
{ setup_kfail "gdb/1497" "*-*-*" }
|
304 |
|
|
}
|
305 |
|
|
}
|
306 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
# A multiple inheritance derived class.
|
308 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
310 |
|
|
"ptype class Bar" "" "class" "Bar" \
|
311 |
|
|
{
|
312 |
|
|
{ base "public Base1" }
|
313 |
|
|
{ base "public Foo" }
|
314 |
|
|
{ field public "int z;" }
|
315 |
|
|
{ method public "Bar(int, int, int);" }
|
316 |
|
|
}
|
317 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
}
|
319 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
# Test simple access to class members.
|
321 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
proc test_non_inherited_member_access {} {
|
323 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
# Print non-inherited members of g_A.
|
325 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_A.a" ".* = 1"
|
326 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_A.x" ".* = 2"
|
327 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
# Print non-inherited members of g_B.
|
329 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_B.b" ".* = 5"
|
330 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_B.x" ".* = 6"
|
331 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
# Print non-inherited members of g_C.
|
333 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_C.c" ".* = 9"
|
334 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_C.x" ".* = 10"
|
335 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
# Print non-inherited members of g_D.
|
337 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_D.d" ".* = 19"
|
338 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_D.x" ".* = 20"
|
339 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
# Print non-inherited members of g_E.
|
341 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_E.e" ".* = 31"
|
342 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_E.x" ".* = 32"
|
343 |
|
|
}
|
344 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
# Test access to members of other classes.
|
346 |
|
|
# gdb should refuse to print them.
|
347 |
|
|
# (I feel old -- I remember when this was legal in C -- chastain).
|
348 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
proc test_wrong_class_members {} {
|
350 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_A.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b."
|
351 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_B.c" "There is no member( or method|) named c."
|
352 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_B.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d."
|
353 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_C.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b."
|
354 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_C.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d."
|
355 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_D.e" "There is no member( or method|) named e."
|
356 |
|
|
}
|
357 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
# Test access to names that are not members of any class.
|
359 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
proc test_nonexistent_members {} {
|
361 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_A.y" "There is no member( or method|) named y."
|
362 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_B.z" "There is no member( or method|) named z."
|
363 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_C.q" "There is no member( or method|) named q."
|
364 |
|
|
gdb_test "print g_D.p" "There is no member( or method|) named p."
|
365 |
|
|
}
|
366 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
# Call a method that expects a base class parameter with base, inherited,
|
368 |
|
|
# and unrelated class arguments.
|
369 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
proc test_method_param_class {} {
|
371 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_A)" ".* = 1"
|
372 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_A)" ".* = 2"
|
373 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_B)" ".* = 3"
|
374 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_B)" ".* = 4"
|
375 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_A)" ".* = 1"
|
376 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_A)" ".* = 2"
|
377 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_B)" ".* = 3"
|
378 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_B)" ".* = 4"
|
379 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_A)" ".* = 1"
|
380 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_A)" ".* = 2"
|
381 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_B)" ".* = 3"
|
382 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_B)" ".* = 4"
|
383 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class *param"
|
385 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class ¶m"
|
386 |
|
|
gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class param"
|
387 |
|
|
}
|
388 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
# Examine a class with an enum field.
|
390 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
proc test_enums {} {
|
392 |
|
|
global gdb_prompt
|
393 |
|
|
global nl
|
394 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
# print the object
|
396 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
# We match the enum values with and without qualifiers. As of
|
398 |
|
|
# 2008-08-21 we can output the qualifiers for DWARF-2.
|
399 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
|
401 |
|
|
"\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = (ClassWithEnum::)?red, x = 0\}" \
|
402 |
|
|
"print obj_with_enum (1)"
|
403 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
# advance one line
|
405 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
gdb_test "next" ".*"
|
407 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
# print the object again
|
409 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
|
411 |
|
|
"\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = (ClassWithEnum::)?green, x = 0\}" \
|
412 |
|
|
"print obj_with_enum (2)"
|
413 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
# print the enum member
|
415 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
gdb_test "print obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = (ClassWithEnum::)?green"
|
417 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
# ptype on the enum member
|
419 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
gdb_test_multiple "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" {
|
421 |
|
|
-re "type = enum ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum \{ ?(ClassWithEnum::)?red, (ClassWithEnum::)?green, (ClassWithEnum::)?blue, (ClassWithEnum::)?yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
422 |
|
|
pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
|
423 |
|
|
}
|
424 |
|
|
-re "type = enum PrivEnum \{ ?(ClassWithEnum::)?red, (ClassWithEnum::)?green, (ClassWithEnum::)?blue, (ClassWithEnum::)?yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
425 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
|
426 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
|
427 |
|
|
pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
|
428 |
|
|
}
|
429 |
|
|
-re "type = enum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
430 |
|
|
# This case case is a little dubious, but it's not clear what
|
431 |
|
|
# ought to be required of a ptype on a private enum...
|
432 |
|
|
# -sts 19990324
|
433 |
|
|
#
|
434 |
|
|
# It bugs me that this happens with gcc 3.
|
435 |
|
|
# -- chastain 2003-12-30
|
436 |
|
|
#
|
437 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
|
438 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
|
439 |
|
|
# gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
|
440 |
|
|
pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
|
441 |
|
|
}
|
442 |
|
|
}
|
443 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
# ptype on the object
|
445 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
# NOTE: carlton/2003-02-28: One could certainly argue that plain
|
447 |
|
|
# "PrivEnum"
|
448 |
|
|
# is acceptable: PrivEnum is a member of ClassWithEnum, so
|
449 |
|
|
# there's no need to explicitly qualify its name with
|
450 |
|
|
# "ClassWithEnum::". The truth, though, is that GDB is simply
|
451 |
|
|
# forgetting that PrivEnum is a member of ClassWithEnum, so we do
|
452 |
|
|
# that output for a bad reason instead of a good reason. Under
|
453 |
|
|
# stabs, we probably can't get this right; under DWARF-2, we can.
|
454 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
cp_test_ptype_class \
|
456 |
|
|
"ptype obj_with_enum" "" "class" "ClassWithEnum" \
|
457 |
|
|
{
|
458 |
|
|
{ field public "ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;" }
|
459 |
|
|
{ field public "int x;" }
|
460 |
|
|
} \
|
461 |
|
|
"" \
|
462 |
|
|
{
|
463 |
|
|
{
|
464 |
|
|
"ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;"
|
465 |
|
|
"PrivEnum priv_enum;"
|
466 |
|
|
{ setup_kfail "gdb/57" "*-*-*" }
|
467 |
|
|
}
|
468 |
|
|
}
|
469 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
# I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
|
471 |
|
|
# See PR gdb/1588.
|
472 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
|
474 |
|
|
-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = (ClassWithEnum::)?yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
475 |
|
|
pass "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
|
476 |
|
|
}
|
477 |
|
|
-re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
478 |
|
|
# "parse error" is bison 1.35.
|
479 |
|
|
# "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
|
480 |
|
|
kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
|
481 |
|
|
}
|
482 |
|
|
}
|
483 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
gdb_test_multiple "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" {
|
485 |
|
|
-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = (ClassWithEnum::)?yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
486 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
|
487 |
|
|
# gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
|
488 |
|
|
pass "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
|
489 |
|
|
}
|
490 |
|
|
-re "No symbol \"ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum\" in current context.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
491 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
|
492 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
|
493 |
|
|
# gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
|
494 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
|
495 |
|
|
kfail "gdb/57" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
|
496 |
|
|
}
|
497 |
|
|
}
|
498 |
|
|
}
|
499 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
# Pointers to class members
|
501 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
proc test_pointers_to_class_members {} {
|
503 |
|
|
gdb_test "print Bar::z" "Cannot reference non-static field \"z\""
|
504 |
|
|
gdb_test "print &Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = &Foo::x"
|
505 |
|
|
gdb_test "print (int)&Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 0"
|
506 |
|
|
gdb_test "print (int)&Bar::y == 2*sizeof(int)" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = true"
|
507 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
gdb_test "ptype Bar::z" "type = int"
|
509 |
|
|
gdb_test "ptype &Bar::z" "type = int Bar::\\*"
|
510 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
# TODO: this is a bogus test. It's looking at a variable that
|
512 |
|
|
# has not even been declared yet, so it's accessing random junk
|
513 |
|
|
# on the stack and comparing that it's NOT equal to a specific
|
514 |
|
|
# value. It's been like this since gdb 4.10 in 1993!
|
515 |
|
|
# -- chastain 2004-01-01
|
516 |
|
|
gdb_test "print (int)pmi == sizeof(int)" ".* = false"
|
517 |
|
|
}
|
518 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
# Test static members.
|
520 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
proc test_static_members {} {
|
522 |
|
|
global hex
|
523 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
gdb_test "print Foo::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 100"
|
525 |
|
|
gdb_test_no_output "set foo.st = 200" ""
|
526 |
|
|
gdb_test "print bar.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"
|
527 |
|
|
gdb_test "print &foo.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
|
528 |
|
|
gdb_test "print &Bar::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
|
529 |
|
|
gdb_test "print *\$" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"
|
530 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
gdb_test_no_output "set print static-members off"
|
532 |
|
|
gdb_test "print csi" \
|
533 |
|
|
"{x = 10, y = 20}" \
|
534 |
|
|
"print csi without static members"
|
535 |
|
|
gdb_test "print cnsi" \
|
536 |
|
|
"{x = 30, y = 40}" \
|
537 |
|
|
"print cnsi without static members"
|
538 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
gdb_test_no_output "set print static-members on"
|
540 |
|
|
gdb_test "print csi" \
|
541 |
|
|
"{x = 10, y = 20, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = }}" \
|
542 |
|
|
"print csi with static members"
|
543 |
|
|
gdb_test "print cnsi" \
|
544 |
|
|
"{x = 30, y = 40, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = , static yy = {z = 5, static xx = {x = 1, y = 2, static null = , static yy = }}}, static yy = }" \
|
545 |
|
|
"print cnsi with static members"
|
546 |
|
|
}
|
547 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
proc do_tests {} {
|
549 |
|
|
global subdir
|
550 |
|
|
global objdir
|
551 |
|
|
global srcdir
|
552 |
|
|
global binfile
|
553 |
|
|
global gdb_prompt
|
554 |
|
|
global nl
|
555 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
# Start with a fresh gdb.
|
558 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
gdb_exit
|
560 |
|
|
gdb_start
|
561 |
|
|
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
|
562 |
|
|
gdb_load $binfile
|
563 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
gdb_test_no_output "set language c++" ""
|
565 |
|
|
gdb_test_no_output "set width 0" ""
|
566 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
if ![runto_main ] then {
|
568 |
|
|
perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
|
569 |
|
|
return
|
570 |
|
|
}
|
571 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
gdb_breakpoint inheritance2
|
573 |
|
|
gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* inheritance2.*" ""
|
574 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
test_ptype_class_objects
|
576 |
|
|
test_non_inherited_member_access
|
577 |
|
|
test_wrong_class_members
|
578 |
|
|
test_nonexistent_members
|
579 |
|
|
test_method_param_class
|
580 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
gdb_breakpoint enums2
|
582 |
|
|
gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* enums2.*" "continue to enums2(\\(\\)|)"
|
583 |
|
|
# Leave enums2. Make sure we reach the next line, in case there
|
584 |
|
|
# are any more instructions to finish the function call.
|
585 |
|
|
gdb_test_multiple "finish" "" {
|
586 |
|
|
-re "enums2 \\(\\);.*$gdb_prompt $" {
|
587 |
|
|
gdb_test "next" ".*" ""
|
588 |
|
|
}
|
589 |
|
|
-re "$gdb_prompt $" { }
|
590 |
|
|
}
|
591 |
|
|
test_enums
|
592 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
gdb_test "finish" ".*" ""
|
594 |
|
|
test_pointers_to_class_members
|
595 |
|
|
test_static_members
|
596 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
# Now some random tests that were just thrown in here.
|
598 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
gdb_breakpoint marker_reg1
|
600 |
|
|
gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* marker_reg1.*" ""
|
601 |
|
|
gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit from.*" "finish from marker_reg1"
|
602 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
# This class is so small that an instance of it can fit in a register.
|
604 |
|
|
# When gdb tries to call a method, it gets embarrassed about taking
|
605 |
|
|
# the address of a register.
|
606 |
|
|
#
|
607 |
|
|
# TODO: I think that message should be a PASS, not an XFAIL.
|
608 |
|
|
# gdb prints an informative message and declines to do something
|
609 |
|
|
# impossible.
|
610 |
|
|
#
|
611 |
|
|
# The method call actually succeeds if the compiler allocates very
|
612 |
|
|
# small classes in memory instead of registers. So this test does
|
613 |
|
|
# not tell us anything interesting if the call succeeds.
|
614 |
|
|
#
|
615 |
|
|
# -- chastain 2003-12-31
|
616 |
|
|
gdb_test_multiple "print v.method ()" "calling method for small class" {
|
617 |
|
|
-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 82$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
618 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
|
619 |
|
|
# gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
|
620 |
|
|
# gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
|
621 |
|
|
# gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
|
622 |
|
|
pass "calling method for small class"
|
623 |
|
|
}
|
624 |
|
|
-re "Address requested for identifier \"v\" which is in register .*$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
|
625 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
|
626 |
|
|
# gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
|
627 |
|
|
setup_xfail "*-*-*" 2972
|
628 |
|
|
fail "calling method for small class"
|
629 |
|
|
}
|
630 |
|
|
}
|
631 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
gdb_test "print base1::Base1" "<.*Base1.*>" "print ctor of typedef class"
|
633 |
|
|
gdb_test "print base1::~Base1" "<.*~Base1(\\(\\))?>" \
|
634 |
|
|
"print dtor of typedef class"
|
635 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
gdb_test "list ByAnyOtherName::times" ".*int Foo::times.*"
|
637 |
|
|
}
|
638 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
do_tests
|