OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_me/openrisc_me/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc_me

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-src/] [gdb-7.2/] [gdb/] [testsuite/] [gdb.cp/] [psmang.exp] - Blame information for rev 330

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 330 jeremybenn
# Copyright 2002, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
2
 
3
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
6
# (at your option) any later version.
7
#
8
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
11
# GNU General Public License for more details.
12
#
13
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14
# along with this program.  If not, see .
15
 
16
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite
17
 
18
# Looking up methods by name, in programs with multiple compilation units.
19
 
20
# ====== PLEASE BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN CHANGING THIS TEST. =====
21
#
22
# The bug we're testing for (circa October 2002) is very sensitive to
23
# various conditions that are hard to control directly in the test
24
# suite.  If you change the test, please revert this change, and make
25
# sure the test still fails:
26
#
27
# 2002-08-29  Jim Blandy  
28
#
29
#       * symtab.c (lookup_symbol_aux): In the cases where we find a
30
#       minimal symbol of an appropriate name and use its address to
31
#       select a symtab to read and search, use `name' (as passed to us)
32
#       as the demangled name when searching the symtab's global and
33
#       static blocks, not the minsym's name.
34
#
35
# The original bug was that you'd try to set a breakpoint on a method
36
# (e.g., `break s::method1'), and you'd get an error, but if you
37
# repeated the command, it would work the second time:
38
#
39
#   (gdb) break s::method1
40
#   the class s does not have any method named method1
41
#   Hint: try 's::method1 or 's::method1
42
#   (Note leading single quote.)
43
#   (gdb) break s::method1
44
#   Breakpoint 1 at 0x804841b: file psmang1.cc, line 13.
45
#   (gdb)
46
#
47
# We observed this bug first using Stabs, and then using Dwarf 2.
48
#
49
# The problem was in lookup_symbol_aux: when looking up s::method1, it
50
# would fail to find it in any symtabs, find the minsym with the
51
# corresponding mangled name (say, `_ZN1S7method1Ev'), pass the
52
# minsym's address to find_pc_sect_symtab to look up the symtab
53
# (causing the compilation unit's full symbols to be read in), and
54
# then look up the symbol in that symtab's global block.  All that is
55
# correct.  However, it would pass the minsym's name as the NAME
56
# argument to lookup_block_symbol; a minsym's name is mangled, whereas
57
# lookup_block_symbol's NAME argument should be demangled.
58
#
59
# This is a pretty simple bug, but it turns out to be a bear to
60
# construct a test for.  That's why this test case is so delicate.  If
61
# you can see how to make it less so, please contribute a patch.
62
#
63
# Here are the twists:
64
#
65
# The bug only manifests itself when we call lookup_symbol to look up
66
# a method name (like "s::method1" or "s::method2"), and that method's
67
# definition is in a compilation unit for which we have read partial
68
# symbols, but not full symbols.  The partial->full conversion must be
69
# caused by that specific lookup.  (If we already have full symbols
70
# for the method's compilation unit, we won't need to look up the
71
# minsym, find the symtab for the minsym's address, and then call
72
# lookup_block_symbol; it's that last call where things go awry.)
73
#
74
# Now, when asked to set a breakpoint at `s::method1', GDB will first
75
# look up `s' to see if that is, in fact, the name of a class, and
76
# then look up 's::method1'.  So we have to make sure that looking up
77
# `s' doesn't cause full symbols to be read for the compilation unit
78
# containing the definition of `s::method1'.
79
#
80
# The partial symbol tables for `psmang1.cc' and `psmang2.cc' will
81
# both have entries for `s'; GDB will read full symbols for whichever
82
# compilation unit's partial symbol table appears first in the
83
# objfile's list.  The order in which compilation units appear in the
84
# partial symbol table list depends on how the program is linked, and
85
# how the debug info reader does the partial symbol scan.  Ideally,
86
# the test shouldn't rely on them appearing in any particular order.
87
#
88
# So, since we don't know which compilation unit's full symbols are
89
# going to get read, we simply try looking up one method from each of
90
# the two compilation units.  One of them has to come after the other
91
# in the partial symbol table list, so whichever comes later will
92
# still need its partial symbols read by the time we go to look up
93
# 's::methodX'.
94
#
95
# Second twist: don't move the common definition of `struct s' into a
96
# header file.  If the compiler emits identical stabs for the
97
# #inclusion of that header file into psmang1.cc and into psmang2.cc,
98
# then the linker will do stabs compression, and replace one of the
99
# BINCL/EINCL regions with an EXCL stab, pointing to the other
100
# BINCL/EINCL region.  GDB will read this, and record that the
101
# compilation unit that got the EXCL depends on the compilation unit
102
# that kept the BINCL/EINCL.  Then, when it decides it needs to read
103
# full symbols for the former, it'll also read full symbols for the
104
# latter.  Now, if it just so happens that the compilation unit that
105
# got the EXCL is also the first one with a definition of `s' in the
106
# partial symbol table list, then that first probe for `s' will cause
107
# both compilation units' full symbols to be read --- again defeating
108
# the test.
109
#
110
# We could work around this by having three compilation units, or by
111
# ensuring that the header file produces different stabs each time
112
# it's #included, but it seems simplest just to avoid compilation unit
113
# dependencies altogether, drop the header file, and duplicate the
114
# (pretty trivial) struct definition.
115
#
116
# Note that #including any header file at all into both compilation
117
# units --- say,  --- could create this sort of dependency.
118
#
119
# This is the aspect of the test which the debug format is most likely
120
# to affect, I think.  The different formats create different kinds of
121
# inter-CU dependencies, which could mask the bug.  It might be
122
# possible for the test to check that at least one of the partial
123
# symtabs remains unread, and fail otherwise --- the failure
124
# indicating that the test itself isn't going to catch the bug it was
125
# meant to, not that GDB is misbehaving.
126
#
127
# Third twist: given the way lookup_block_symbol is written, it's
128
# possible to find the symbol even when it gets passed a mangled name
129
# for its NAME parameter.  There are three ways lookup_block_symbol
130
# might search a block, depending on how it was constructed:
131
#
132
# linear search.  In this case, this bug will never manifest itself,
133
# since we check every symbol against NAME using SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME.
134
# Since that macro checks its second argument (NAME) against both the
135
# mangled and demangled names of the symbol, this will always find the
136
# symbol successfully, so, no bug.
137
#
138
# hash table.  If both the mangled and demangled names hash to the
139
# same bucket, then you'll again find the symbol "by accident", since
140
# we search the entire bucket using SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME.  Since GDB
141
# chooses the number of buckets based on the number of symbols, small
142
# compilation units may have only one hash bucket; in this case, the
143
# search always succeeds, even though we hashed on the wrong name.
144
# This test works around that by having a lot of dummy variables,
145
# making it less likely that the mangled and demangled names fall in
146
# the same bucket.
147
#
148
# binary search.  (GDB 5.2 produced these sorts of blocks, and this
149
# test tries to detect the bug there, but subsequent versions of GDB
150
# almost never build them, and they may soon be removed entirely.)  In
151
# this case, the symbols in the block are sorted by their
152
# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (whose behavior depends on the current demangling
153
# setting, so that's wrong, but let's try to stay focussed).
154
# lookup_block_symbol does a binary search comparing NAME with
155
# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME until the range has been narrowed down to only a
156
# few symbols; then it starts a linear search forward from the lower
157
# end of that range, until it reaches a symbol whose
158
# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME follows NAME in lexicographic order.  This means
159
# that, if you're doing a binary search for a mangled name in a block
160
# sorted by SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME, you might find the symbol `by
161
# accident' if the mangled and demangled names happen to fall near
162
# each other in the ordering.  The initial version of this patch used
163
# a class called `S'; all the other symbols in the compilation unit
164
# started with lower-case letters, so the demangled name `S::method1'
165
# sorted at the same place as the mangled name `_ZN1S7method1Ev': at
166
# the very beginning.  Using a lower-case 's' as the name ensures that
167
# the demangled name falls after all the dummy symbols introduced for
168
# the hash table, as described above.
169
#
170
# This is all so tortured, someone will probably come up with still
171
# other ways this test could fail to do its job.  If you need to make
172
# revisions, please be very careful.
173
 
174
if $tracelevel then {
175
    strace $tracelevel
176
}
177
 
178
#
179
# test running programs
180
#
181
 
182
 
183
if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
184
 
185
set testfile "psmang"
186
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
187
 
188
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
189
    return -1;
190
}
191
 
192
if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc" "${testfile}1.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
193
     untested psmang.exp
194
     return -1
195
}
196
 
197
if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc" "${testfile}2.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
198
     untested psmang.exp
199
     return -1
200
}
201
 
202
if  { [gdb_compile "${testfile}1.o ${testfile}2.o" ${binfile} executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
203
     untested psmang.exp
204
     return -1
205
}
206
 
207
 
208
gdb_exit
209
gdb_start
210
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
211
gdb_load ${binfile}
212
 
213
gdb_test "break s::method1" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang1.cc.*"
214
 
215
# We have to exit and restart GDB here, to make sure that all the
216
# compilation units are psymtabs again.
217
 
218
gdb_exit
219
gdb_start
220
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
221
gdb_load ${binfile}
222
 
223
gdb_test "break s::method2" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang2.cc.*"

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.