1 |
207 |
jeremybenn |
/* Run-time exception support */
|
2 |
|
|
#if !defined(__thumb2__)
|
3 |
|
|
#include "swi.h"
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
/* .text is used instead of .section .text so it works with arm-aout too. */
|
6 |
|
|
.text
|
7 |
|
|
.align 0
|
8 |
|
|
.global __rt_stkovf_split_big
|
9 |
|
|
.global __rt_stkovf_split_small
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
/* The following functions are provided for software stack checking.
|
12 |
|
|
If hardware stack-checking is being used then the code can be
|
13 |
|
|
compiled without the PCS entry checks, and simply rely on VM
|
14 |
|
|
management to extend the stack for a thread.
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
The stack extension event occurs when the PCS function entry code
|
17 |
|
|
would result in a stack-pointer beneath the stack-limit register
|
18 |
|
|
value. The system relies on the following map:
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
+-----------------------------------+ <-- end of stack block
|
21 |
|
|
| ... |
|
22 |
|
|
| ... |
|
23 |
|
|
| active stack |
|
24 |
|
|
| ... | <-- sp (stack-pointer) somewhere in here
|
25 |
|
|
| ... |
|
26 |
|
|
+-----------------------------------+ <-- sl (stack-limit)
|
27 |
|
|
| stack-extension handler workspace |
|
28 |
|
|
+-----------------------------------+ <-- base of stack block
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
The "stack-extension handler workspace" is an amount of memory in
|
31 |
|
|
which the stack overflow support code must execute. It must be
|
32 |
|
|
large enough to deal with the worst case path through the extension
|
33 |
|
|
code. At the moment the compiler expects this to be AT LEAST
|
34 |
|
|
256bytes. It uses this fact to code functions with small local
|
35 |
|
|
data usage within the overflow space.
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
In a true target environment We may need to increase the space
|
38 |
|
|
between sl and the true limit to allow for the stack extension
|
39 |
|
|
code, SWI handlers and for undefined instruction handlers of the
|
40 |
|
|
target environment. */
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
__rt_stkovf_split_small:
|
43 |
|
|
mov ip,sp @ Ensure we can calculate the stack required
|
44 |
|
|
@ and fall through to...
|
45 |
|
|
__rt_stkovf_split_big:
|
46 |
|
|
@ in: sp = current stack-pointer (beneath stack-limit)
|
47 |
|
|
@ sl = current stack-limit
|
48 |
|
|
@ ip = low stack point we require for the current function
|
49 |
|
|
@ lr = return address into the current function
|
50 |
|
|
@ fp = frame-pointer
|
51 |
|
|
@ original sp --> +----------------------------------+
|
52 |
|
|
@ | pc (12 ahead of PCS entry store) |
|
53 |
|
|
@ current fp ---> +----------------------------------+
|
54 |
|
|
@ | lr (on entry) pc (on exit) |
|
55 |
|
|
@ +----------------------------------+
|
56 |
|
|
@ | sp ("original sp" on entry) |
|
57 |
|
|
@ +----------------------------------+
|
58 |
|
|
@ | fp (on entry to function) |
|
59 |
|
|
@ +----------------------------------+
|
60 |
|
|
@ | |
|
61 |
|
|
@ | ..argument and work registers.. |
|
62 |
|
|
@ | |
|
63 |
|
|
@ current sp ---> +----------------------------------+
|
64 |
|
|
@
|
65 |
|
|
@ The "current sl" is somewhere between "original sp" and "current sp"
|
66 |
|
|
@ but above "true sl". The "current sl" should be at least 256bytes
|
67 |
|
|
@ above the "true sl". The 256byte stack guard should be large enough
|
68 |
|
|
@ to deal with the worst case function entry stacking (160bytes) plus
|
69 |
|
|
@ the stack overflow handler stacking requirements, plus the stack
|
70 |
|
|
@ required for the memory allocation routines.
|
71 |
|
|
@
|
72 |
|
|
@ Normal PCS entry (before stack overflow check) can stack 16
|
73 |
|
|
@ standard registers (64bytes) and 8 floating point registers
|
74 |
|
|
@ (96bytes). This gives a minimum stack guard of 160bytes (excluding
|
75 |
|
|
@ the stack required for the code). (Actually only a maximum of
|
76 |
|
|
@ 14standard registers are ever stacked on entry to a function).
|
77 |
|
|
@
|
78 |
|
|
@ NOTE: Structure returns are performed by the caller allocating a
|
79 |
|
|
@ dummy space on the stack and passing in a "phantom" arg1 into
|
80 |
|
|
@ the function. This means that we do not need to worry about
|
81 |
|
|
@ preserving the stack under "sp" even on function return.
|
82 |
|
|
@
|
83 |
|
|
@ Code should never poke values beneath sp. The sp register
|
84 |
|
|
@ should always be "dropped" first to cover the data. This
|
85 |
|
|
@ protects the data against any events that may try and use
|
86 |
|
|
@ the stack.
|
87 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
SUB ip, sp, ip @ extra stack required for function
|
89 |
|
|
@ Add stack extension code here. If desired a new stack chunk
|
90 |
|
|
@ can be allocated, and the register state updated suitably.
|
91 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
@ We now know how much extra stack the function requires.
|
93 |
|
|
@ Terminate the program for the moment:
|
94 |
|
|
swi SWI_Exit
|
95 |
|
|
#endif
|