1 |
26 |
unneback |
//{{{ Banner
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
4 |
|
|
//
|
5 |
|
|
// infer.cxx
|
6 |
|
|
//
|
7 |
|
|
// Inference for common conflicts.
|
8 |
|
|
//
|
9 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
10 |
|
|
//####COPYRIGHTBEGIN####
|
11 |
|
|
//
|
12 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
13 |
|
|
// Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001 Red Hat, Inc.
|
14 |
|
|
//
|
15 |
|
|
// This file is part of the eCos host tools.
|
16 |
|
|
//
|
17 |
|
|
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
18 |
|
|
// under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
|
19 |
|
|
// Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
|
20 |
|
|
// any later version.
|
21 |
|
|
//
|
22 |
|
|
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
23 |
|
|
// ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
24 |
|
|
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
25 |
|
|
// more details.
|
26 |
|
|
//
|
27 |
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
28 |
|
|
// this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
|
29 |
|
|
// 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
|
30 |
|
|
//
|
31 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
32 |
|
|
//
|
33 |
|
|
//####COPYRIGHTEND####
|
34 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
35 |
|
|
//#####DESCRIPTIONBEGIN####
|
36 |
|
|
//
|
37 |
|
|
// Author(s): bartv
|
38 |
|
|
// Contact(s): bartv
|
39 |
|
|
// Date: 1999/11/1
|
40 |
|
|
// Version: 0.01
|
41 |
|
|
//
|
42 |
|
|
//####DESCRIPTIONEND####
|
43 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
//}}}
|
46 |
|
|
//{{{ #include's
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
49 |
|
|
#include "cdlconfig.h"
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
// Get the infrastructure types, assertions, tracing and similar
|
52 |
|
|
// facilities.
|
53 |
|
|
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_ass.h>
|
54 |
|
|
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_trac.h>
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
// <cdlcore.hxx> defines everything implemented in this module.
|
57 |
|
|
// It implicitly supplies <string>, <vector> and <map> because
|
58 |
|
|
// the class definitions rely on these headers.
|
59 |
|
|
#include <cdlcore.hxx>
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
//}}}
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer class
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
//{{{ Description
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
68 |
|
|
// The following functions provide the main entry points for inference.
|
69 |
|
|
//
|
70 |
|
|
// 1) bool CdlInfer::make_active(CdlTransaction, CdlValuable, level)
|
71 |
|
|
// Do whatever it takes to make the valuable active in
|
72 |
|
|
// a clean sub-transaction, if possible.
|
73 |
|
|
// 2) bool CdlInfer::make_inactive(CdlTransaction, CdlValuable, level)
|
74 |
|
|
// Do whatever it takes to make the valuable inactive.
|
75 |
|
|
// 3) bool CdlInfer::set_valuable_value(CdlTransaction, CdlValuable, CdlSimpleValue&, level)
|
76 |
|
|
// Try to set the valuable to the specified value, taking into
|
77 |
|
|
// account the different flavors.
|
78 |
|
|
// 4) bool CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(CdlTransaction, CdlValuable, bool, level)
|
79 |
|
|
// Similar to (3) but deals with the boolean aspect of the valuable
|
80 |
|
|
// rather than the data part.
|
81 |
|
|
// 5) bool CdlInfer::subexpr(CdlTransaction, CdlExpression, int index, CdlSimpleValue& goal, level)
|
82 |
|
|
// Process a sub-expression and try to make it evaluate to the
|
83 |
|
|
// goal.
|
84 |
|
|
// 6) bool CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(CdlTransaction, CdlExpression, int index, bool goal, level)
|
85 |
|
|
// Ditto but only deal with boolean goals. If the expression starts to
|
86 |
|
|
// involve arithmetic etc. then we need to move to CdlInfer::subexpr()
|
87 |
|
|
//
|
88 |
|
|
// As might be expected, the sub-expression handlers contain a big
|
89 |
|
|
// switch statement and calls into various auxiliary functions when
|
90 |
|
|
// necessary.
|
91 |
|
|
//
|
92 |
|
|
// For convenience the various entry points check whether or not the
|
93 |
|
|
// desired condition is already satisfied.
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
//}}}
|
96 |
|
|
//{{{ Forward declarations
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
static bool infer_handle_interface_value(CdlTransaction, CdlInterface, CdlSimpleValue&, int);
|
101 |
|
|
static bool infer_handle_reference_bool(CdlTransaction, CdlValuable, bool, int);
|
102 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
//}}}
|
104 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::make_active()
|
105 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
107 |
|
|
// Making a node active. This requires the following conditions to be
|
108 |
|
|
// satisfied:
|
109 |
|
|
// 1) the parent must be made active
|
110 |
|
|
// 2) if the parent has flavor bool or booldata, it must be enabled
|
111 |
|
|
// 3) any active_if properties
|
112 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
bool
|
114 |
|
|
CdlInfer::make_active(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlNode node, int level)
|
115 |
|
|
{
|
116 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::make_active", "result %d");
|
117 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(transaction, node, level);
|
118 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
119 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(node);
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
122 |
|
|
if (transaction->is_active(node)) {
|
123 |
|
|
result = true;
|
124 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
125 |
|
|
return result;
|
126 |
|
|
}
|
127 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
CdlContainer parent = node->get_parent();
|
129 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERT_CLASSC(parent);
|
130 |
|
|
if (!transaction->is_active(parent)) {
|
131 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::make_active(transaction, parent, level)) {
|
132 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
133 |
|
|
return result;
|
134 |
|
|
}
|
135 |
|
|
}
|
136 |
|
|
// The parent is now active. Does it have to be enabled as well?
|
137 |
|
|
CdlValuable parent_valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(static_cast<CdlNode>(parent));
|
138 |
|
|
if (0 != parent_valuable) {
|
139 |
|
|
CdlValueFlavor flavor = parent_valuable->get_flavor();
|
140 |
|
|
if (((CdlValueFlavor_Bool == flavor) || (CdlValueFlavor_BoolData == flavor)) &&
|
141 |
|
|
!parent_valuable->is_enabled(transaction)) {
|
142 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(transaction, parent_valuable, true, level)) {
|
143 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
144 |
|
|
return result;
|
145 |
|
|
}
|
146 |
|
|
}
|
147 |
|
|
}
|
148 |
|
|
// The parent is now active and enabled. Are there any active_if properties to worry about?
|
149 |
|
|
CdlValuable valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(node);
|
150 |
|
|
if (0 != valuable) {
|
151 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlProperty_GoalExpression> active_if_goals;
|
152 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlProperty_GoalExpression>::iterator goal_i;
|
153 |
|
|
valuable->get_active_if_conditions(active_if_goals);
|
154 |
|
|
for (goal_i = active_if_goals.begin(); goal_i != active_if_goals.end(); goal_i++) {
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
CdlEvalContext context(transaction, valuable, *goal_i);
|
157 |
|
|
try {
|
158 |
|
|
if (!(*goal_i)->eval(context)) {
|
159 |
|
|
CdlExpression expr = (*goal_i)->get_expression();
|
160 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(transaction, expr, expr->first_subexpression, true, level)) {
|
161 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
162 |
|
|
return result;
|
163 |
|
|
}
|
164 |
|
|
}
|
165 |
|
|
} catch(...) {
|
166 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
167 |
|
|
return result;
|
168 |
|
|
}
|
169 |
|
|
}
|
170 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
}
|
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
result = transaction->is_active(node);
|
174 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
175 |
|
|
return result;
|
176 |
|
|
}
|
177 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
//}}}
|
179 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::make_inactive()
|
180 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
182 |
|
|
// Making a node inactive can be done in three ways:
|
183 |
|
|
// 1) if the parent is boolean, try disabling it
|
184 |
|
|
// 2) otherwise if the parent can be made inactive, that will do
|
185 |
|
|
// fine.
|
186 |
|
|
// 3) if there are any active_if properties, they could be considered
|
187 |
|
|
// as well. For now this possibility is ignored.
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
bool
|
190 |
|
|
CdlInfer::make_inactive(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlNode node, int level)
|
191 |
|
|
{
|
192 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::make_inactive", "result %d");
|
193 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(transaction, node, level);
|
194 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
195 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(node);
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
198 |
|
|
if (!transaction->is_active(node)) {
|
199 |
|
|
result = true;
|
200 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
201 |
|
|
return result;
|
202 |
|
|
}
|
203 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
CdlContainer parent = node->get_parent();
|
205 |
|
|
if (0 == parent) {
|
206 |
|
|
// No point in trying to disable the entire configuration.
|
207 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
208 |
|
|
return result;
|
209 |
|
|
}
|
210 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
CdlValuable parent_valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(parent);
|
212 |
|
|
if (0 != parent_valuable) {
|
213 |
|
|
CdlValueFlavor flavor = parent_valuable->get_flavor();
|
214 |
|
|
if ((CdlValueFlavor_Bool == flavor) || (CdlValueFlavor_BoolData == flavor)) {
|
215 |
|
|
// Since the current node is active the parent must currently be enabled.
|
216 |
|
|
// A sub-transaction is needed because an alternative approach is
|
217 |
|
|
// possible later on.
|
218 |
|
|
CdlTransaction subtransaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
219 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(subtransaction, parent_valuable, false, level)) {
|
220 |
|
|
subtransaction->commit();
|
221 |
|
|
delete subtransaction;
|
222 |
|
|
result = true;
|
223 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
224 |
|
|
return result;
|
225 |
|
|
} else {
|
226 |
|
|
subtransaction->cancel();
|
227 |
|
|
delete subtransaction;
|
228 |
|
|
}
|
229 |
|
|
}
|
230 |
|
|
}
|
231 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
// It is not possible to disable the parent. How about making it inactive?
|
233 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::make_inactive(transaction, parent, level)) {
|
234 |
|
|
result = true;
|
235 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
236 |
|
|
return result;
|
237 |
|
|
}
|
238 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
// For now do not try to mess about with active_if conditions.
|
240 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
242 |
|
|
return result;
|
243 |
|
|
}
|
244 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
//}}}
|
246 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::set_valuable_value()
|
247 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
249 |
|
|
// Deal with the value part of a valuable. The valuable is known to exist
|
250 |
|
|
// and be active, so this code only deals with the actual value part.
|
251 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
bool
|
253 |
|
|
CdlInfer::set_valuable_value(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlValuable valuable, CdlSimpleValue& goal, int level)
|
254 |
|
|
{
|
255 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::set_valuable_value", "result %d");
|
256 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(transaction, valuable, level);
|
257 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
258 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(valuable);
|
259 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(transaction->is_active(valuable));
|
260 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
262 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
const CdlValue& current_value = transaction->get_whole_value(valuable);
|
264 |
|
|
CdlValueFlavor flavor = current_value.get_flavor();
|
265 |
|
|
bool bool_goal = goal.get_bool_value();
|
266 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
switch(flavor) {
|
268 |
|
|
default :
|
269 |
|
|
case CdlValueFlavor_None :
|
270 |
|
|
break;
|
271 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
case CdlValueFlavor_Bool :
|
273 |
|
|
if (bool_goal == current_value.is_enabled()) {
|
274 |
|
|
result = true;
|
275 |
|
|
} else {
|
276 |
|
|
if (valuable->is_modifiable() &&
|
277 |
|
|
(0 == dynamic_cast<CdlLoadable>(valuable)) &&
|
278 |
|
|
!transaction->changed_by_user(valuable)) {
|
279 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
valuable->set_enabled(transaction, bool_goal, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
281 |
|
|
valuable->set_source(transaction, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
282 |
|
|
result = transaction->resolve_recursion(level);
|
283 |
|
|
}
|
284 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
}
|
286 |
|
|
break;
|
287 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
case CdlValueFlavor_BoolData :
|
289 |
|
|
if (!bool_goal && !current_value.is_enabled()) {
|
290 |
|
|
result = true;
|
291 |
|
|
} else if (bool_goal && current_value.is_enabled() && (goal == current_value.get_simple_value())) {
|
292 |
|
|
result = true;
|
293 |
|
|
} else {
|
294 |
|
|
if (valuable->is_modifiable() &&
|
295 |
|
|
(0 == dynamic_cast<CdlLoadable>(valuable)) &&
|
296 |
|
|
!transaction->changed_by_user(valuable)) {
|
297 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
if (!bool_goal) {
|
299 |
|
|
valuable->disable(transaction, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
300 |
|
|
} else {
|
301 |
|
|
valuable->enable_and_set_value(transaction, goal, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
302 |
|
|
}
|
303 |
|
|
valuable->set_source(transaction, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
304 |
|
|
result = transaction->resolve_recursion(level);
|
305 |
|
|
} else if (0 != dynamic_cast<CdlInterface>(valuable)) {
|
306 |
|
|
// Interfaces are not directly modifiable, but their implementors are.
|
307 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_interface_value(transaction, dynamic_cast<CdlInterface>(valuable), goal, level);
|
308 |
|
|
}
|
309 |
|
|
}
|
310 |
|
|
break;
|
311 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
case CdlValueFlavor_Data:
|
313 |
|
|
// Now check whether or not the valuable already has the desired value
|
314 |
|
|
if (goal == current_value.get_simple_value()) {
|
315 |
|
|
result = true;
|
316 |
|
|
} else {
|
317 |
|
|
if (valuable->is_modifiable() &&
|
318 |
|
|
(0 == dynamic_cast<CdlLoadable>(valuable)) &&
|
319 |
|
|
!transaction->changed_by_user(valuable)) {
|
320 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
// Make the change, propagate, and perform further resolution.
|
322 |
|
|
valuable->set_value(transaction, goal, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
323 |
|
|
valuable->set_source(transaction, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
324 |
|
|
result = transaction->resolve_recursion(level);
|
325 |
|
|
} else if (0 != dynamic_cast<CdlInterface>(valuable)) {
|
326 |
|
|
// Interfaces are not directly modifiable, but their implementors are.
|
327 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_interface_value(transaction, dynamic_cast<CdlInterface>(valuable), goal, level);
|
328 |
|
|
}
|
329 |
|
|
}
|
330 |
|
|
break;
|
331 |
|
|
}
|
332 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
334 |
|
|
return result;
|
335 |
|
|
}
|
336 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
//}}}
|
338 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool()
|
339 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
341 |
|
|
// Deal with the boolean part of a valuable. It is assumed that active vs.
|
342 |
|
|
// inactive is dealt with elsewhere so this code only needs to worry
|
343 |
|
|
// about the valuable itself.
|
344 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
bool
|
346 |
|
|
CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlValuable valuable, bool goal, int level)
|
347 |
|
|
{
|
348 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool", "result %d");
|
349 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, valuable, goal, level);
|
350 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
351 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(valuable);
|
352 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
354 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
// Examine the current flavor. If None or Data then the valuable
|
356 |
|
|
// is always enabled. If BoolData or Boolean then the condition
|
357 |
|
|
// may be satisfied already, otherwise an attempt must be made
|
358 |
|
|
// to change the value and see what happens.
|
359 |
|
|
CdlValueFlavor flavor = valuable->get_flavor();
|
360 |
|
|
if (CdlValueFlavor_None == flavor) {
|
361 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
362 |
|
|
result = true;
|
363 |
|
|
}
|
364 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
365 |
|
|
return result;
|
366 |
|
|
}
|
367 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
if (CdlValueFlavor_Data == flavor) {
|
369 |
|
|
std::string value = valuable->get_value(transaction);
|
370 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
371 |
|
|
if (("" != value) && ("0" != value)) {
|
372 |
|
|
result = true;
|
373 |
|
|
}
|
374 |
|
|
} else {
|
375 |
|
|
if (("" == value) || ("0" == value)) {
|
376 |
|
|
result = true;
|
377 |
|
|
}
|
378 |
|
|
}
|
379 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
380 |
|
|
return result;
|
381 |
|
|
}
|
382 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERTC((CdlValueFlavor_Bool == flavor) || (CdlValueFlavor_BoolData == flavor));
|
384 |
|
|
bool enabled = valuable->is_enabled(transaction);
|
385 |
|
|
if (enabled == goal) {
|
386 |
|
|
result = true;
|
387 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
388 |
|
|
return result;
|
389 |
|
|
}
|
390 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
// enabled != goal, and we have a boolean or booldata item.
|
392 |
|
|
// Before we actually try making any changes, is this sensible?
|
393 |
|
|
if (!valuable->is_modifiable() ||
|
394 |
|
|
(0 != dynamic_cast<CdlLoadable>(valuable)) ||
|
395 |
|
|
transaction->changed_by_user(valuable)) {
|
396 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
398 |
|
|
return result;
|
399 |
|
|
}
|
400 |
|
|
// If we are about to disable a container, better check that this would
|
401 |
|
|
// not annoy the user either
|
402 |
|
|
if (!goal) {
|
403 |
|
|
CdlContainer container = dynamic_cast<CdlContainer>(valuable);
|
404 |
|
|
if ((0 != container) && transaction->subnode_changed_by_user(container)) {
|
405 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
406 |
|
|
return result;
|
407 |
|
|
}
|
408 |
|
|
}
|
409 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
// Try to change the state, propagate, and perform further resolution.
|
411 |
|
|
valuable->set_enabled(transaction, goal, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
412 |
|
|
valuable->set_source(transaction, CdlValueSource_Inferred);
|
413 |
|
|
result = transaction->resolve_recursion(level);
|
414 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
416 |
|
|
return result;
|
417 |
|
|
}
|
418 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
//}}}
|
420 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_choose()
|
421 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
423 |
|
|
// Given two sub-transactions which may or may not have succeeded, pick the
|
424 |
|
|
// preferred one. This happens for many binary operators.
|
425 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
static bool
|
427 |
|
|
infer_lhs_preferable(CdlTransaction lhs_transaction, bool lhs_result, CdlTransaction rhs_transaction, bool rhs_result)
|
428 |
|
|
{
|
429 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_choose2", "result %d");
|
430 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
431 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs_result || rhs_result);
|
432 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
bool result = true;
|
434 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
if (lhs_result && !rhs_result) {
|
436 |
|
|
// Only the lhs succeeded.
|
437 |
|
|
result = true;
|
438 |
|
|
} else if (!lhs_result && rhs_result) {
|
439 |
|
|
// Only the rhs succeeded.
|
440 |
|
|
result = false;
|
441 |
|
|
} else if (lhs_result && rhs_result) {
|
442 |
|
|
// Both sides succeeded. Next check for user_confirmation.
|
443 |
|
|
bool lhs_confirm_needed = lhs_transaction->user_confirmation_required();
|
444 |
|
|
bool rhs_confirm_needed = rhs_transaction->user_confirmation_required();
|
445 |
|
|
if (lhs_confirm_needed && !rhs_confirm_needed) {
|
446 |
|
|
result = false;
|
447 |
|
|
} else if (!lhs_confirm_needed && rhs_confirm_needed) {
|
448 |
|
|
result = true;
|
449 |
|
|
} else {
|
450 |
|
|
// Neither or both of the two sides need user confirmation, so they
|
451 |
|
|
// are equal in that respect
|
452 |
|
|
if (lhs_transaction->is_preferable_to(rhs_transaction)) {
|
453 |
|
|
result = true;
|
454 |
|
|
} else {
|
455 |
|
|
result = false;
|
456 |
|
|
}
|
457 |
|
|
}
|
458 |
|
|
}
|
459 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
461 |
|
|
return result;
|
462 |
|
|
}
|
463 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
// A variant which will actually do the commits and cancels. This is
|
465 |
|
|
// commonly required when doing inferences of binary operators.
|
466 |
|
|
static bool
|
467 |
|
|
infer_choose2(CdlTransaction lhs_transaction, bool lhs_result, CdlTransaction rhs_transaction, bool rhs_result)
|
468 |
|
|
{
|
469 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_choose2", "result %d");
|
470 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
471 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
472 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
if (lhs_result || rhs_result) {
|
474 |
|
|
bool lhs_preferable = infer_lhs_preferable(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
475 |
|
|
if (lhs_preferable) {
|
476 |
|
|
rhs_transaction->cancel();
|
477 |
|
|
lhs_transaction->commit();
|
478 |
|
|
} else {
|
479 |
|
|
lhs_transaction->cancel();
|
480 |
|
|
rhs_transaction->commit();
|
481 |
|
|
}
|
482 |
|
|
result = true;
|
483 |
|
|
} else {
|
484 |
|
|
// Neither side succeeded.
|
485 |
|
|
lhs_transaction->cancel();
|
486 |
|
|
rhs_transaction->cancel();
|
487 |
|
|
}
|
488 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
// Zero or one of these transactions will have been committed,
|
490 |
|
|
// neither is still necessary.
|
491 |
|
|
delete lhs_transaction;
|
492 |
|
|
delete rhs_transaction;
|
493 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
495 |
|
|
return result;
|
496 |
|
|
}
|
497 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
//}}}
|
499 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_interface()
|
500 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
502 |
|
|
// Set an interface to a specific value, which should be some number n.
|
503 |
|
|
// If (n == 0) then all implementers must be disabled or made inactive.
|
504 |
|
|
// If (n == 1) then exactly one of the implementers must be active and enabled.
|
505 |
|
|
// Other combinations are not considered here, they could lead to an
|
506 |
|
|
// exponential explosion.
|
507 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
static bool
|
509 |
|
|
infer_handle_interface_value(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlInterface interface, CdlSimpleValue& goal, int level)
|
510 |
|
|
{
|
511 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_reference_bool", "result %d");
|
512 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, interface, &goal, level);
|
513 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
514 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
if (goal.has_integer_value()) {
|
516 |
|
|
cdl_int real_goal = goal.get_integer_value();
|
517 |
|
|
if (real_goal == interface->get_integer_value(transaction)) {
|
518 |
|
|
result = true;
|
519 |
|
|
} else if (0 == real_goal) {
|
520 |
|
|
// All implementers must be disabled or made inactive. This
|
521 |
|
|
// can be achieved by creating a sub-transaction and calling
|
522 |
|
|
// infer_handle_reference_bool() on all of the implementers.
|
523 |
|
|
//
|
524 |
|
|
// However there are no guarantees that the result is what
|
525 |
|
|
// is intended. Updating a later implementer may as a side
|
526 |
|
|
// effect cause an earlier one to become active again. Also
|
527 |
|
|
// there may be confusion with valuables with the data
|
528 |
|
|
// flavor being given a value of 0. Hence a final check is
|
529 |
|
|
// needed that the new interface value really is the desired goal.
|
530 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub_transaction;
|
531 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlValuable> implementers;
|
532 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlValuable>::const_iterator impl_i;
|
533 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
sub_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
535 |
|
|
try {
|
536 |
|
|
interface->get_implementers(implementers);
|
537 |
|
|
for (impl_i = implementers.begin(); impl_i != implementers.end(); impl_i++) {
|
538 |
|
|
(void) infer_handle_reference_bool(sub_transaction, *impl_i, false, level);
|
539 |
|
|
}
|
540 |
|
|
if (0 == interface->get_integer_value(sub_transaction)) {
|
541 |
|
|
sub_transaction->commit();
|
542 |
|
|
result = true;
|
543 |
|
|
} else {
|
544 |
|
|
sub_transaction->cancel();
|
545 |
|
|
}
|
546 |
|
|
} catch (...) {
|
547 |
|
|
delete sub_transaction;
|
548 |
|
|
throw;
|
549 |
|
|
}
|
550 |
|
|
delete sub_transaction;
|
551 |
|
|
sub_transaction = 0;
|
552 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
} else if (1 == real_goal) {
|
554 |
|
|
// This is a bit trickier than the above. We need n
|
555 |
|
|
// sub-transactions, one per implementer. In each
|
556 |
|
|
// sub-transaction we try to set exactly one of the
|
557 |
|
|
// implementers to enabled and the rest to disabled.
|
558 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlValuable> implementers;
|
559 |
|
|
unsigned int impl_count;
|
560 |
|
|
unsigned int i, j;
|
561 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
interface->get_implementers(implementers);
|
563 |
|
|
impl_count = implementers.size();
|
564 |
|
|
std::vector<CdlTransaction> sub_transactions;
|
565 |
|
|
std::vector<bool> results;
|
566 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
try {
|
568 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < impl_count; i++) {
|
569 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
570 |
|
|
sub_transactions.push_back(sub_transaction);
|
571 |
|
|
results.push_back(false);
|
572 |
|
|
results[i] = false;
|
573 |
|
|
}
|
574 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < impl_count; i++) {
|
575 |
|
|
for (j = 0; j < impl_count; j++) {
|
576 |
|
|
(void) infer_handle_reference_bool(sub_transactions[i], implementers[j], (i == j), level);
|
577 |
|
|
}
|
578 |
|
|
if (1 == interface->get_integer_value(sub_transactions[i])) {
|
579 |
|
|
results[i] = true;
|
580 |
|
|
}
|
581 |
|
|
}
|
582 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
// At this point we may have some combination of successful and unsucessful
|
584 |
|
|
// sub-transactions, and it is time to choose the best one.
|
585 |
|
|
CdlTransaction preferred = 0;
|
586 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < impl_count; i++) {
|
587 |
|
|
if (results[i]) {
|
588 |
|
|
preferred = sub_transactions[i];
|
589 |
|
|
break;
|
590 |
|
|
}
|
591 |
|
|
}
|
592 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
for (j = i + 1; j < impl_count; j++) {
|
594 |
|
|
if (results[j]) {
|
595 |
|
|
if (!infer_lhs_preferable(preferred, true, sub_transactions[j], true)) {
|
596 |
|
|
preferred = sub_transactions[j];
|
597 |
|
|
}
|
598 |
|
|
}
|
599 |
|
|
}
|
600 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
// Now either preferred == 0, i.e. all
|
602 |
|
|
// sub-transactions failed and we want to cancel them
|
603 |
|
|
// all. Or we have a viable sub-transaction.
|
604 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < impl_count; i++) {
|
605 |
|
|
if (preferred == sub_transactions[i]) {
|
606 |
|
|
sub_transactions[i]->commit();
|
607 |
|
|
result = true;
|
608 |
|
|
} else {
|
609 |
|
|
sub_transactions[i]->cancel();
|
610 |
|
|
}
|
611 |
|
|
delete sub_transactions[i];
|
612 |
|
|
sub_transactions[i] = 0;
|
613 |
|
|
}
|
614 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
} catch(...) {
|
616 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < sub_transactions.size(); i++) {
|
617 |
|
|
if (0 != sub_transactions[i]) {
|
618 |
|
|
sub_transactions[i]->cancel();
|
619 |
|
|
delete sub_transactions[i];
|
620 |
|
|
sub_transactions[i] = 0;
|
621 |
|
|
}
|
622 |
|
|
}
|
623 |
|
|
}
|
624 |
|
|
}
|
625 |
|
|
}
|
626 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
628 |
|
|
return result;
|
629 |
|
|
}
|
630 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
//}}}
|
632 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_reference()
|
633 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
635 |
|
|
// We are processing an expression and have reached a point where we
|
636 |
|
|
// need <reference>, !<reference> or <reference>==<value>. The
|
637 |
|
|
// reference may currently be unbound, in which case 0 is the only
|
638 |
|
|
// goal that can be satisfied. If the reference is bound then it may
|
639 |
|
|
// be possible to satisfy the goal by setting the value. In addition
|
640 |
|
|
// it is necessary to worry about active vs. inactive state.
|
641 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
static bool
|
643 |
|
|
infer_handle_reference_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlValuable valuable, bool goal, int level)
|
644 |
|
|
{
|
645 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_reference_bool", "result %d");
|
646 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, valuable, goal, level);
|
647 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
649 |
|
|
if (0 == valuable) {
|
650 |
|
|
if (!goal) {
|
651 |
|
|
result = true;
|
652 |
|
|
}
|
653 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
654 |
|
|
return result;
|
655 |
|
|
}
|
656 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
// If the valuable should evaluate to true then it must be both active
|
658 |
|
|
// and be either enabled or have a non-zero value.
|
659 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
660 |
|
|
if (!transaction->is_active(valuable)) {
|
661 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::make_active(transaction, valuable, level)) {
|
662 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
663 |
|
|
return result;
|
664 |
|
|
}
|
665 |
|
|
}
|
666 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(transaction, valuable, true, level)) {
|
667 |
|
|
result = true;
|
668 |
|
|
}
|
669 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
} else {
|
671 |
|
|
// If the valuable should evaluate to false then it must be either
|
672 |
|
|
// inactive or it must be disabled or have a zero value.
|
673 |
|
|
if (!transaction->is_active(valuable)) {
|
674 |
|
|
// The goal is already satisfied, no need to proceed
|
675 |
|
|
result = true;
|
676 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
677 |
|
|
return result;
|
678 |
|
|
}
|
679 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
// There is a choice to be made so two sub-transactions are
|
681 |
|
|
// needed. Disabling is generally preferred to making inactive.
|
682 |
|
|
CdlTransaction value_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
683 |
|
|
CdlTransaction inactive_transaction = 0;
|
684 |
|
|
bool value_result = CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(value_transaction, valuable, false, level);
|
685 |
|
|
if (value_result && !value_transaction->user_confirmation_required()) {
|
686 |
|
|
value_transaction->commit();
|
687 |
|
|
delete value_transaction;
|
688 |
|
|
value_transaction = 0;
|
689 |
|
|
result = true;
|
690 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
691 |
|
|
return result;
|
692 |
|
|
}
|
693 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
695 |
|
|
bool inactive_result = CdlInfer::make_inactive(inactive_transaction, valuable, level);
|
696 |
|
|
if (!inactive_result) {
|
697 |
|
|
if (value_result) {
|
698 |
|
|
// Changing the value is the only solution.
|
699 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->cancel();
|
700 |
|
|
value_transaction->commit();
|
701 |
|
|
result = true;
|
702 |
|
|
} else {
|
703 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->cancel();
|
704 |
|
|
value_transaction->cancel();
|
705 |
|
|
result = false;
|
706 |
|
|
}
|
707 |
|
|
} else {
|
708 |
|
|
if (!value_result) {
|
709 |
|
|
// Making the valuable inactive is the only solution.
|
710 |
|
|
value_transaction->cancel();
|
711 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->commit();
|
712 |
|
|
result = true;
|
713 |
|
|
} else if (!inactive_transaction->user_confirmation_required()) {
|
714 |
|
|
// Disabling the valuable would require user confirmation, making it inactive does not
|
715 |
|
|
value_transaction->cancel();
|
716 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->commit();
|
717 |
|
|
result = true;
|
718 |
|
|
} else {
|
719 |
|
|
// Both approaches are valid but would require user confirmation.
|
720 |
|
|
// Pick the preferred one.
|
721 |
|
|
if (value_transaction->is_preferable_to(inactive_transaction)) {
|
722 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->cancel();
|
723 |
|
|
value_transaction->commit();
|
724 |
|
|
result = true;
|
725 |
|
|
} else {
|
726 |
|
|
value_transaction->cancel();
|
727 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->commit();
|
728 |
|
|
result = true;
|
729 |
|
|
}
|
730 |
|
|
}
|
731 |
|
|
}
|
732 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
delete value_transaction;
|
734 |
|
|
delete inactive_transaction;
|
735 |
|
|
value_transaction = 0;
|
736 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = 0;
|
737 |
|
|
}
|
738 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
740 |
|
|
return result;
|
741 |
|
|
}
|
742 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
744 |
|
|
// Try to set a valuable to a particular value. Of course the reference
|
745 |
|
|
// may not be bound yet.
|
746 |
|
|
//
|
747 |
|
|
// First check whether or not the valuable is currently active. If it is
|
748 |
|
|
// inactive and the goal is 0 then we have succeeded. If it is active and
|
749 |
|
|
// the goal is 0 then we could try to make the valuable inactive, but
|
750 |
|
|
// this possibility is ignored for now in case it leads to unexpected
|
751 |
|
|
// behaviour. If it is active then we try to set the value, using
|
752 |
|
|
// CdlInfer::set_valuable_value().
|
753 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
static bool
|
755 |
|
|
infer_handle_reference_value(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlValuable valuable, CdlSimpleValue& goal, int level)
|
756 |
|
|
{
|
757 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_reference", "result %d");
|
758 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(transaction, valuable, level);
|
759 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
761 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
if (0 == valuable) {
|
763 |
|
|
if (goal == (cdl_int) 0) {
|
764 |
|
|
result = true;
|
765 |
|
|
}
|
766 |
|
|
} else {
|
767 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
bool active = transaction->is_active(valuable);
|
769 |
|
|
if (!active) {
|
770 |
|
|
if (goal == (cdl_int) 0) {
|
771 |
|
|
result = true;
|
772 |
|
|
}
|
773 |
|
|
} else {
|
774 |
|
|
result = CdlInfer::set_valuable_value(transaction, valuable, goal, level);
|
775 |
|
|
}
|
776 |
|
|
}
|
777 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
779 |
|
|
return result;
|
780 |
|
|
}
|
781 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
//}}}
|
783 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_xxx_constant()
|
784 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
786 |
|
|
// Somewhere in the expression processing we have encountered a string
|
787 |
|
|
// constant. The expression cannot be changed, so either the goal matches
|
788 |
|
|
// the constant or it does not.
|
789 |
|
|
static bool
|
790 |
|
|
infer_handle_string_constant_bool(CdlSimpleValue& constant, bool goal)
|
791 |
|
|
{
|
792 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_string_constant_bool", "result %d");
|
793 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
794 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
796 |
|
|
if (("" != constant.get_value()) && ("0" != constant.get_value())) {
|
797 |
|
|
result = true;
|
798 |
|
|
}
|
799 |
|
|
} else {
|
800 |
|
|
if (("" == constant.get_value()) || ("0" == constant.get_value())) {
|
801 |
|
|
result = true;
|
802 |
|
|
}
|
803 |
|
|
}
|
804 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
806 |
|
|
return result;
|
807 |
|
|
}
|
808 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
static bool
|
810 |
|
|
infer_handle_string_constant_value(CdlSimpleValue& constant, CdlSimpleValue& goal)
|
811 |
|
|
{
|
812 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_string_constant_value", "result %d");
|
813 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
814 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
if (constant.get_value() == goal.get_value()) {
|
816 |
|
|
result = true;
|
817 |
|
|
}
|
818 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
820 |
|
|
return result;
|
821 |
|
|
}
|
822 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
824 |
|
|
// Integers are also fairly straightforward.
|
825 |
|
|
static bool
|
826 |
|
|
infer_handle_integer_constant_bool(CdlSimpleValue& constant, bool goal)
|
827 |
|
|
{
|
828 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_integer_constant_bool", "result %d");
|
829 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(constant.has_integer_value());
|
830 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
831 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
833 |
|
|
if (0 != constant.get_integer_value()) {
|
834 |
|
|
result = true;
|
835 |
|
|
}
|
836 |
|
|
} else {
|
837 |
|
|
if (0 == constant.get_integer_value()) {
|
838 |
|
|
result = true;
|
839 |
|
|
}
|
840 |
|
|
}
|
841 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
843 |
|
|
return result;
|
844 |
|
|
}
|
845 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
static bool
|
847 |
|
|
infer_handle_integer_constant_value(CdlSimpleValue& constant, CdlSimpleValue& goal)
|
848 |
|
|
{
|
849 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_integer_constant_value", "result %d");
|
850 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(constant.has_integer_value());
|
851 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
852 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
if (goal.has_integer_value() && (constant.get_integer_value() == goal.get_integer_value())) {
|
854 |
|
|
result = true;
|
855 |
|
|
}
|
856 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
858 |
|
|
return result;
|
859 |
|
|
}
|
860 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
862 |
|
|
// Doubles are also straightforward, except than an exact comparision may
|
863 |
|
|
// be too strict. There is not a lot that can be done about this right now.
|
864 |
|
|
// Future enhancements to CDL may support tolerances.
|
865 |
|
|
static bool
|
866 |
|
|
infer_handle_double_constant_bool(CdlSimpleValue& constant, bool goal)
|
867 |
|
|
{
|
868 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_double_constant_bool", "result %d");
|
869 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(constant.has_double_value());
|
870 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
871 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
873 |
|
|
if (0.0 != constant.get_double_value()) {
|
874 |
|
|
result = true;
|
875 |
|
|
}
|
876 |
|
|
} else {
|
877 |
|
|
if (0.0 == constant.get_double_value()) {
|
878 |
|
|
result = true;
|
879 |
|
|
}
|
880 |
|
|
}
|
881 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
883 |
|
|
return result;
|
884 |
|
|
}
|
885 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
static bool
|
887 |
|
|
infer_handle_double_constant_value(CdlSimpleValue& constant, CdlSimpleValue& goal)
|
888 |
|
|
{
|
889 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_double_constant_value", "result %d");
|
890 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(constant.has_double_value());
|
891 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
892 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
if (goal.has_double_value() && (constant.get_double_value() == goal.get_double_value())) {
|
894 |
|
|
result = true;
|
895 |
|
|
}
|
896 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
898 |
|
|
return result;
|
899 |
|
|
}
|
900 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
//}}}
|
902 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_logical_xxx()
|
903 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
905 |
|
|
// Logical not simply involves inverting the goal and then trying to infer
|
906 |
|
|
// the rest of the sub-expression. There is little point in touching
|
907 |
|
|
// the other arguments.
|
908 |
|
|
static bool
|
909 |
|
|
infer_handle_logical_NOT_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int index, bool goal, int level)
|
910 |
|
|
{
|
911 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_logical_NOT_bool", "result %d");
|
912 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
bool result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(transaction, expr, index, !goal, level);
|
914 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
915 |
|
|
return result;
|
916 |
|
|
}
|
917 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
919 |
|
|
// Depending on the goal, we want either both sides of the AND to evaluate to
|
920 |
|
|
// true, or we want one of the sides to evaluate to false.
|
921 |
|
|
static bool
|
922 |
|
|
infer_handle_AND_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs,
|
923 |
|
|
bool goal, int level)
|
924 |
|
|
{
|
925 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_AND_bool", "result %d");
|
926 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
927 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
928 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
929 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
930 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
932 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
934 |
|
|
// Both sides must be true in the same transaction, in case
|
935 |
|
|
// the solutions overlap in conflicting ways. A sub-transaction
|
936 |
|
|
// is still used to avoid polluting current values if the lhs
|
937 |
|
|
// can be inferred but not the rhs.
|
938 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
939 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
940 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, rhs, true, level)) {
|
941 |
|
|
sub_transaction->commit();
|
942 |
|
|
result = true;
|
943 |
|
|
} else {
|
944 |
|
|
sub_transaction->cancel();
|
945 |
|
|
}
|
946 |
|
|
delete sub_transaction;
|
947 |
|
|
} else {
|
948 |
|
|
// We need to try out both sides of the OR and see which one is preferable.
|
949 |
|
|
// An optimization would be to only try the LHS, but trying both allows
|
950 |
|
|
// for a more informed choice.
|
951 |
|
|
CdlTransaction lhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
952 |
|
|
CdlTransaction rhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
953 |
|
|
bool lhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(lhs_transaction, expr, lhs, false, level);
|
954 |
|
|
bool rhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(rhs_transaction, expr, rhs, false, level);
|
955 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
957 |
|
|
}
|
958 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
960 |
|
|
return result;
|
961 |
|
|
}
|
962 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
964 |
|
|
// The support for the other logical operations involves basically minor
|
965 |
|
|
// variants of the above.
|
966 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
static bool
|
968 |
|
|
infer_handle_OR_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs,
|
969 |
|
|
bool goal, int level)
|
970 |
|
|
{
|
971 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_OR_bool", "result %d");
|
972 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
973 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
974 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
975 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
976 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
979 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
981 |
|
|
// We need to try out both sides of the OR and see which one is preferable.
|
982 |
|
|
// An optimization would be to only try the LHS, but trying both allows
|
983 |
|
|
// for a more informed choice.
|
984 |
|
|
CdlTransaction lhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
985 |
|
|
CdlTransaction rhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
986 |
|
|
bool lhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(lhs_transaction, expr, lhs, true, level);
|
987 |
|
|
bool rhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(rhs_transaction, expr, rhs, true, level);
|
988 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
990 |
|
|
} else {
|
991 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
// !(A || B) -> !A && !B
|
993 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
994 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, lhs, false, level) &&
|
995 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, rhs, false, level)) {
|
996 |
|
|
sub_transaction->commit();
|
997 |
|
|
result = true;
|
998 |
|
|
} else {
|
999 |
|
|
sub_transaction->cancel();
|
1000 |
|
|
}
|
1001 |
|
|
delete sub_transaction;
|
1002 |
|
|
}
|
1003 |
|
|
|
1004 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1005 |
|
|
return result;
|
1006 |
|
|
}
|
1007 |
|
|
|
1008 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1009 |
|
|
|
1010 |
|
|
static bool
|
1011 |
|
|
infer_handle_IMPLIES_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs,
|
1012 |
|
|
bool goal, int level)
|
1013 |
|
|
{
|
1014 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_implies_bool", "result %d");
|
1015 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
1016 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1017 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1018 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
1019 |
|
|
|
1020 |
|
|
|
1021 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1022 |
|
|
|
1023 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1024 |
|
|
// A implies B -> !A || B
|
1025 |
|
|
// Given a choice between !A or B, arguably the "implies"
|
1026 |
|
|
// operator has the connotation that B is preferred. All other
|
1027 |
|
|
// things being equal, infer_choose2() will prefer the rhs
|
1028 |
|
|
// over the lhs so this is achieved automagically.
|
1029 |
|
|
|
1030 |
|
|
CdlTransaction lhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1031 |
|
|
CdlTransaction rhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1032 |
|
|
bool lhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(lhs_transaction, expr, lhs, false, level);
|
1033 |
|
|
bool rhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(rhs_transaction, expr, rhs, true, level);
|
1034 |
|
|
|
1035 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
1036 |
|
|
|
1037 |
|
|
} else {
|
1038 |
|
|
|
1039 |
|
|
// !(A implies B) -> !(!A || B) -> (A && !B)
|
1040 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1041 |
|
|
if (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
1042 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub_transaction, expr, rhs, false, level)) {
|
1043 |
|
|
sub_transaction->commit();
|
1044 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1045 |
|
|
} else {
|
1046 |
|
|
sub_transaction->cancel();
|
1047 |
|
|
}
|
1048 |
|
|
delete sub_transaction;
|
1049 |
|
|
}
|
1050 |
|
|
|
1051 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1052 |
|
|
return result;
|
1053 |
|
|
}
|
1054 |
|
|
|
1055 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1056 |
|
|
|
1057 |
|
|
static bool
|
1058 |
|
|
infer_handle_XOR_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs,
|
1059 |
|
|
bool goal, int level)
|
1060 |
|
|
{
|
1061 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_XOR_bool", "result %d");
|
1062 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
1063 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1064 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1065 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
1066 |
|
|
|
1067 |
|
|
|
1068 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1069 |
|
|
|
1070 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1071 |
|
|
// (A xor B) -> (A && !B) || (!A && B)
|
1072 |
|
|
|
1073 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub1 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1074 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub2 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1075 |
|
|
bool result1 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
1076 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, rhs, false, level));
|
1077 |
|
|
bool result2 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, lhs, false, level) &&
|
1078 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, rhs, true, level));
|
1079 |
|
|
|
1080 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(sub1, result1, sub2, result2);
|
1081 |
|
|
|
1082 |
|
|
} else {
|
1083 |
|
|
|
1084 |
|
|
// !(A xor B) -> (!A && !B) || (A && B)
|
1085 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub1 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1086 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub2 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1087 |
|
|
bool result1 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, lhs, false, level) &&
|
1088 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, rhs, false, level));
|
1089 |
|
|
bool result2 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
1090 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, rhs, true, level));
|
1091 |
|
|
|
1092 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(sub1, result1, sub2, result2);
|
1093 |
|
|
}
|
1094 |
|
|
|
1095 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1096 |
|
|
return result;
|
1097 |
|
|
}
|
1098 |
|
|
|
1099 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1100 |
|
|
|
1101 |
|
|
static bool
|
1102 |
|
|
infer_handle_EQV_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs,
|
1103 |
|
|
bool goal, int level)
|
1104 |
|
|
{
|
1105 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_EQV_bool", "result %d");
|
1106 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
1107 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1108 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1109 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
1110 |
|
|
|
1111 |
|
|
|
1112 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1113 |
|
|
|
1114 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1115 |
|
|
// (A eqv B) -> (A && B) || (!A && !B)
|
1116 |
|
|
|
1117 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub1 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1118 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub2 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1119 |
|
|
bool result1 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
1120 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, rhs, true, level));
|
1121 |
|
|
bool result2 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, lhs, false, level) &&
|
1122 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, rhs, false, level));
|
1123 |
|
|
|
1124 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(sub1, result1, sub2, result2);
|
1125 |
|
|
} else {
|
1126 |
|
|
// !(A eqv B) -> (A && !B) || (!A && B)
|
1127 |
|
|
|
1128 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub1 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1129 |
|
|
CdlTransaction sub2 = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1130 |
|
|
bool result1 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, lhs, true, level) &&
|
1131 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub1, expr, rhs, false, level));
|
1132 |
|
|
bool result2 = (CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, lhs, false, level) &&
|
1133 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(sub2, expr, rhs, true, level));
|
1134 |
|
|
|
1135 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(sub1, result1, sub2, result2);
|
1136 |
|
|
}
|
1137 |
|
|
|
1138 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1139 |
|
|
return result;
|
1140 |
|
|
}
|
1141 |
|
|
|
1142 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1143 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_Equal()
|
1144 |
|
|
|
1145 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1146 |
|
|
// Handle expressions of the form A == B. This can be achieved either by
|
1147 |
|
|
// evaluating B and trying to assign the result to A, or vice versa. There
|
1148 |
|
|
// is a problem if assigning to one side has a side effect on the other, e.g.
|
1149 |
|
|
//
|
1150 |
|
|
// requires { xyzzy == (xyzzy + 3) }
|
1151 |
|
|
//
|
1152 |
|
|
// This has to be guarded against by reevaluating the expression.
|
1153 |
|
|
//
|
1154 |
|
|
// At present this code only copes with equality, not inequality.
|
1155 |
|
|
|
1156 |
|
|
static bool
|
1157 |
|
|
infer_handle_equal_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs, bool goal, int level)
|
1158 |
|
|
{
|
1159 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_equal_bool", "result %d");
|
1160 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
1161 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1162 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1163 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
1164 |
|
|
|
1165 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1166 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1167 |
|
|
|
1168 |
|
|
// We need two sub-transactions, The lhs_transaction is for evaluating the lhs
|
1169 |
|
|
// and trying to update the rhs.
|
1170 |
|
|
CdlTransaction lhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1171 |
|
|
bool lhs_result = false;
|
1172 |
|
|
try {
|
1173 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue lhs_value;
|
1174 |
|
|
CdlEvalContext lhs_context(lhs_transaction);
|
1175 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(lhs_context, lhs, lhs_value);
|
1176 |
|
|
lhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_value(lhs_transaction, expr, rhs, lhs_value, level);
|
1177 |
|
|
if (lhs_result) {
|
1178 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue check;
|
1179 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(lhs_context, lhs, check);
|
1180 |
|
|
if (lhs_value != check) {
|
1181 |
|
|
lhs_result = false;
|
1182 |
|
|
}
|
1183 |
|
|
}
|
1184 |
|
|
} catch (...) {
|
1185 |
|
|
lhs_result = false;
|
1186 |
|
|
}
|
1187 |
|
|
|
1188 |
|
|
CdlTransaction rhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1189 |
|
|
bool rhs_result = false;
|
1190 |
|
|
try {
|
1191 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue rhs_value;
|
1192 |
|
|
CdlEvalContext rhs_context(rhs_transaction);
|
1193 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(rhs_context, rhs, rhs_value);
|
1194 |
|
|
rhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_value(rhs_transaction, expr, lhs, rhs_value, level);
|
1195 |
|
|
if (rhs_result) {
|
1196 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue check;
|
1197 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(rhs_context, rhs, check);
|
1198 |
|
|
if (rhs_value != check) {
|
1199 |
|
|
rhs_result = false;
|
1200 |
|
|
}
|
1201 |
|
|
}
|
1202 |
|
|
} catch (...) {
|
1203 |
|
|
rhs_result = false;
|
1204 |
|
|
}
|
1205 |
|
|
|
1206 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
1207 |
|
|
}
|
1208 |
|
|
|
1209 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1210 |
|
|
return result;
|
1211 |
|
|
}
|
1212 |
|
|
|
1213 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1214 |
|
|
//{{{ infer_handle_numerical_equal()
|
1215 |
|
|
|
1216 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1217 |
|
|
// Handle expressions of the form A == B, where the comparison has to be
|
1218 |
|
|
// numerical in basis. This is used primarily for operators like <=
|
1219 |
|
|
// and >.
|
1220 |
|
|
|
1221 |
|
|
static bool
|
1222 |
|
|
infer_handle_numerical_equal_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int lhs, unsigned int rhs, bool goal, int level)
|
1223 |
|
|
{
|
1224 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("infer_handle_numerical_equal_bool", "result %d");
|
1225 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, lhs, rhs);
|
1226 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1227 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1228 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(lhs != rhs);
|
1229 |
|
|
|
1230 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1231 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1232 |
|
|
|
1233 |
|
|
// We need two sub-transactions, The lhs_transaction is for evaluating the lhs
|
1234 |
|
|
// and trying to update the rhs.
|
1235 |
|
|
CdlTransaction lhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1236 |
|
|
bool lhs_result = false;
|
1237 |
|
|
try {
|
1238 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue lhs_value;
|
1239 |
|
|
CdlEvalContext lhs_context(lhs_transaction);
|
1240 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(lhs_context, lhs, lhs_value);
|
1241 |
|
|
if (lhs_value.has_integer_value() || lhs_value.has_double_value()) {
|
1242 |
|
|
lhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_value(lhs_transaction, expr, rhs, lhs_value, level);
|
1243 |
|
|
if (lhs_result) {
|
1244 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue check;
|
1245 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(lhs_context, lhs, check);
|
1246 |
|
|
if (lhs_value != check) {
|
1247 |
|
|
lhs_result = false;
|
1248 |
|
|
}
|
1249 |
|
|
}
|
1250 |
|
|
}
|
1251 |
|
|
} catch (...) {
|
1252 |
|
|
lhs_result = false;
|
1253 |
|
|
}
|
1254 |
|
|
|
1255 |
|
|
CdlTransaction rhs_transaction = transaction->make(transaction->get_conflict());
|
1256 |
|
|
bool rhs_result = false;
|
1257 |
|
|
try {
|
1258 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue rhs_value;
|
1259 |
|
|
CdlEvalContext rhs_context(rhs_transaction);
|
1260 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(rhs_context, rhs, rhs_value);
|
1261 |
|
|
if (rhs_value.has_integer_value() || rhs_value.has_double_value()) {
|
1262 |
|
|
rhs_result = CdlInfer::subexpr_value(rhs_transaction, expr, lhs, rhs_value, level);
|
1263 |
|
|
if (rhs_result) {
|
1264 |
|
|
CdlSimpleValue check;
|
1265 |
|
|
expr->eval_subexpression(rhs_context, rhs, check);
|
1266 |
|
|
if (rhs_value != check) {
|
1267 |
|
|
rhs_result = false;
|
1268 |
|
|
}
|
1269 |
|
|
}
|
1270 |
|
|
}
|
1271 |
|
|
} catch (...) {
|
1272 |
|
|
rhs_result = false;
|
1273 |
|
|
}
|
1274 |
|
|
|
1275 |
|
|
result = infer_choose2(lhs_transaction, lhs_result, rhs_transaction, rhs_result);
|
1276 |
|
|
}
|
1277 |
|
|
|
1278 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1279 |
|
|
return result;
|
1280 |
|
|
}
|
1281 |
|
|
|
1282 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1283 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::subexpr_bool()
|
1284 |
|
|
|
1285 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1286 |
|
|
bool
|
1287 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int index, bool goal, int level)
|
1288 |
|
|
{
|
1289 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::subexpr_bool", "result %d");
|
1290 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG5XV(transaction, expr, index, goal, level);
|
1291 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1292 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1293 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC((0 <= index) && (index < expr->sub_expressions.size()));
|
1294 |
|
|
|
1295 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1296 |
|
|
CdlSubexpression& subexpr = expr->sub_expressions[index];
|
1297 |
|
|
|
1298 |
|
|
switch(subexpr.op) {
|
1299 |
|
|
|
1300 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Reference :
|
1301 |
|
|
// The most common case. Follow the reference, and call the appropriate function.
|
1302 |
|
|
// Note that the reference may be unbound.
|
1303 |
|
|
{
|
1304 |
|
|
CdlNode node = expr->references[subexpr.reference_index].get_destination();
|
1305 |
|
|
CdlValuable valuable = 0;
|
1306 |
|
|
if (0 != node) {
|
1307 |
|
|
valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(node);
|
1308 |
|
|
}
|
1309 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_reference_bool(transaction, valuable, goal, level);
|
1310 |
|
|
break;
|
1311 |
|
|
}
|
1312 |
|
|
|
1313 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_StringConstant :
|
1314 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_string_constant_bool(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1315 |
|
|
break;
|
1316 |
|
|
|
1317 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_IntegerConstant :
|
1318 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_integer_constant_bool(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1319 |
|
|
break;
|
1320 |
|
|
|
1321 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_DoubleConstant :
|
1322 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_double_constant_bool(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1323 |
|
|
break;
|
1324 |
|
|
|
1325 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_LogicalNot :
|
1326 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_logical_NOT_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, goal, level);
|
1327 |
|
|
break;
|
1328 |
|
|
|
1329 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_And :
|
1330 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_AND_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1331 |
|
|
break;
|
1332 |
|
|
|
1333 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Or :
|
1334 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_OR_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1335 |
|
|
break;
|
1336 |
|
|
|
1337 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Implies :
|
1338 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_IMPLIES_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1339 |
|
|
break;
|
1340 |
|
|
|
1341 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Xor :
|
1342 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_XOR_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1343 |
|
|
break;
|
1344 |
|
|
|
1345 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Eqv :
|
1346 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_EQV_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1347 |
|
|
break;
|
1348 |
|
|
|
1349 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Equal :
|
1350 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_equal_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, goal, level);
|
1351 |
|
|
break;
|
1352 |
|
|
|
1353 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_NotEqual :
|
1354 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_equal_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, !goal, level);
|
1355 |
|
|
break;
|
1356 |
|
|
|
1357 |
|
|
// <= is satisfied by a numerical equality. However the inverse relation > cannot be handled that way
|
1358 |
|
|
// The other comparison operators are much the same.
|
1359 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_LessEqual :
|
1360 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_GreaterEqual :
|
1361 |
|
|
if (goal) {
|
1362 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_numerical_equal_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, true, level);
|
1363 |
|
|
}
|
1364 |
|
|
break;
|
1365 |
|
|
|
1366 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_LessThan :
|
1367 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_GreaterThan :
|
1368 |
|
|
if (!goal) {
|
1369 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_numerical_equal_bool(transaction, expr, subexpr.lhs_index, subexpr.rhs_index, true, level);
|
1370 |
|
|
}
|
1371 |
|
|
break;
|
1372 |
|
|
|
1373 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Function :
|
1374 |
|
|
result = CdlFunction::infer_bool(transaction, expr, index, goal, level);
|
1375 |
|
|
break;
|
1376 |
|
|
|
1377 |
|
|
default:
|
1378 |
|
|
// No other inferences are implemented at this stage.
|
1379 |
|
|
break;
|
1380 |
|
|
}
|
1381 |
|
|
|
1382 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1383 |
|
|
return result;
|
1384 |
|
|
}
|
1385 |
|
|
|
1386 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1387 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlInfer::subexpr_value()
|
1388 |
|
|
|
1389 |
|
|
bool
|
1390 |
|
|
CdlInfer::subexpr_value(CdlTransaction transaction, CdlExpression expr, unsigned int index, CdlSimpleValue& goal, int level)
|
1391 |
|
|
{
|
1392 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlInfer::subexpr_value", "result %d");
|
1393 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(transaction, expr, index, level);
|
1394 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1395 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(expr);
|
1396 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC((0 <= index) && (index < expr->sub_expressions.size()));
|
1397 |
|
|
|
1398 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1399 |
|
|
CdlSubexpression& subexpr = expr->sub_expressions[index];
|
1400 |
|
|
|
1401 |
|
|
switch(subexpr.op) {
|
1402 |
|
|
|
1403 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Reference :
|
1404 |
|
|
// The most common case. Follow the reference, and call the appropriate function.
|
1405 |
|
|
// Note that the reference may be unbound.
|
1406 |
|
|
{
|
1407 |
|
|
CdlNode node = expr->references[subexpr.reference_index].get_destination();
|
1408 |
|
|
CdlValuable valuable = 0;
|
1409 |
|
|
if (0 != node) {
|
1410 |
|
|
valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(node);
|
1411 |
|
|
}
|
1412 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_reference_value(transaction, valuable, goal, level);
|
1413 |
|
|
break;
|
1414 |
|
|
}
|
1415 |
|
|
|
1416 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_StringConstant :
|
1417 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_string_constant_value(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1418 |
|
|
break;
|
1419 |
|
|
|
1420 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_IntegerConstant :
|
1421 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_integer_constant_value(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1422 |
|
|
break;
|
1423 |
|
|
|
1424 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_DoubleConstant :
|
1425 |
|
|
result = infer_handle_double_constant_value(subexpr.constants, goal);
|
1426 |
|
|
break;
|
1427 |
|
|
|
1428 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_LogicalNot :
|
1429 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_And :
|
1430 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Or :
|
1431 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Implies :
|
1432 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Xor :
|
1433 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Eqv :
|
1434 |
|
|
{
|
1435 |
|
|
bool new_goal = true;
|
1436 |
|
|
if (("0" == goal.get_value()) || ("" == goal.get_value())) {
|
1437 |
|
|
new_goal = false;
|
1438 |
|
|
}
|
1439 |
|
|
result = CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(transaction, expr, index, new_goal, level);
|
1440 |
|
|
break;
|
1441 |
|
|
}
|
1442 |
|
|
|
1443 |
|
|
case CdlExprOp_Function :
|
1444 |
|
|
result = CdlFunction::infer_value(transaction, expr, index, goal, level);
|
1445 |
|
|
break;
|
1446 |
|
|
|
1447 |
|
|
default:
|
1448 |
|
|
// No other inferences are implemented at this stage.
|
1449 |
|
|
break;
|
1450 |
|
|
}
|
1451 |
|
|
|
1452 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1453 |
|
|
return result;
|
1454 |
|
|
}
|
1455 |
|
|
|
1456 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1457 |
|
|
|
1458 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1459 |
|
|
//{{{ Illegal value resolution
|
1460 |
|
|
|
1461 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1462 |
|
|
// This is not yet implemented.
|
1463 |
|
|
|
1464 |
|
|
bool
|
1465 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::inner_resolve(CdlTransaction transaction, int level)
|
1466 |
|
|
{
|
1467 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_IllegalValue::inner_resolve", "result %d");
|
1468 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(this, transaction, level);
|
1469 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
1470 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1471 |
|
|
|
1472 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlTransaction, transaction);
|
1473 |
|
|
|
1474 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(false);
|
1475 |
|
|
return false;
|
1476 |
|
|
}
|
1477 |
|
|
|
1478 |
|
|
//}}}
|
1479 |
|
|
//{{{ Requires resolution
|
1480 |
|
|
|
1481 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
1482 |
|
|
// The entry point for this code is
|
1483 |
|
|
// CdlConflict_RequiresBody::resolve(). "this" is a requires conflict
|
1484 |
|
|
// that needs to be resolved, if possible. There are twos argument: a
|
1485 |
|
|
// sub-transaction, which should be filled in with the solution if
|
1486 |
|
|
// possible; and a recursion level indicator, 0 if this is a top-level
|
1487 |
|
|
// inference engine invocation rather than a recursive one. There are
|
1488 |
|
|
// additional static parameters inference_recursion_limit and
|
1489 |
|
|
// inference_override which control details of the inference process.
|
1490 |
|
|
//
|
1491 |
|
|
// As an example of what is involved in an inference, consider the
|
1492 |
|
|
// simple case of a "requires XXX" property. This constraint may not
|
1493 |
|
|
// be satisfied because XXX is disabled, because XXX is inactive,
|
1494 |
|
|
// or both.
|
1495 |
|
|
//
|
1496 |
|
|
// Assume for simplicity that XXX is already active. The inference
|
1497 |
|
|
// engine can now figure out that XXX must be enabled (it must be
|
1498 |
|
|
// of type bool or booldata, or else the conflict would not have
|
1499 |
|
|
// arisen). This is achieved by creating a sub-transaction,
|
1500 |
|
|
// enabling XXX in that sub-transaction, propagating the
|
1501 |
|
|
// sub-transaction and performing further inference. The inference
|
1502 |
|
|
// is successfull if no new conflicts are introduced.
|
1503 |
|
|
//
|
1504 |
|
|
// However, even if a solution is found it is not necessarily
|
1505 |
|
|
// acceptable without user confirmation, subject to
|
1506 |
|
|
// inference_override. This is handled in part by the transaction
|
1507 |
|
|
// class itself, in the resolve() and user_confirmation_required()
|
1508 |
|
|
// members. In cases where the inference engine can choose between
|
1509 |
|
|
// several alternatives it needs to consider this issue for each one.
|
1510 |
|
|
// Resolving a requires conflict. There are three ways of tackling
|
1511 |
|
|
// this problem, in order of preference:
|
1512 |
|
|
//
|
1513 |
|
|
// 1) change the terms in the expression to make it evaluate to
|
1514 |
|
|
// true.
|
1515 |
|
|
// 2) disable the source so that the requires property is no longer
|
1516 |
|
|
// relevant.
|
1517 |
|
|
// 3) make the source inactive, with the same effect.
|
1518 |
|
|
//
|
1519 |
|
|
// The first one should always be tried. If it is entirely successful
|
1520 |
|
|
// then there is no point in looking any further. If user confirmation
|
1521 |
|
|
// is required then the second approach should be tried. If that is
|
1522 |
|
|
// entirely successful then there is no point in looking further.
|
1523 |
|
|
// If user confirmation is required then the third approach should
|
1524 |
|
|
// be tried.
|
1525 |
|
|
|
1526 |
|
|
bool
|
1527 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::inner_resolve(CdlTransaction transaction, int level)
|
1528 |
|
|
{
|
1529 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Requires::inner_resolve");
|
1530 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(this, transaction, level);
|
1531 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
1532 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(transaction);
|
1533 |
|
|
|
1534 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1535 |
|
|
|
1536 |
|
|
CdlProperty_GoalExpression gexpr = dynamic_cast<CdlProperty_GoalExpression>(this->get_property());
|
1537 |
|
|
CdlExpression expr = gexpr->get_expression();
|
1538 |
|
|
|
1539 |
|
|
// Only create the sub-transactions when needed.
|
1540 |
|
|
CdlTransaction expr_transaction = 0;
|
1541 |
|
|
CdlTransaction disable_transaction = 0;
|
1542 |
|
|
CdlTransaction inactive_transaction = 0;
|
1543 |
|
|
|
1544 |
|
|
// Keep track of the preferred solution found to date.
|
1545 |
|
|
CdlTransaction preferred_transaction = 0;
|
1546 |
|
|
|
1547 |
|
|
expr_transaction = transaction->make(this);
|
1548 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::subexpr_bool(expr_transaction, expr, expr->first_subexpression, true, level)) {
|
1549 |
|
|
// No luck here.
|
1550 |
|
|
expr_transaction->cancel();
|
1551 |
|
|
delete expr_transaction;
|
1552 |
|
|
expr_transaction = 0;
|
1553 |
|
|
} else {
|
1554 |
|
|
// We have a possible solution. How acceptable is it?
|
1555 |
|
|
if (!expr_transaction->user_confirmation_required()) {
|
1556 |
|
|
// Whoopee.
|
1557 |
|
|
expr_transaction->commit();
|
1558 |
|
|
delete expr_transaction;
|
1559 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1560 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1561 |
|
|
return result;
|
1562 |
|
|
} else {
|
1563 |
|
|
// Maybe we can do better.
|
1564 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = expr_transaction;
|
1565 |
|
|
expr_transaction = 0;
|
1566 |
|
|
}
|
1567 |
|
|
}
|
1568 |
|
|
|
1569 |
|
|
// Disabling the source only makes sense if we have a bool or booldata item.
|
1570 |
|
|
CdlValuable valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(this->get_node());
|
1571 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERT_CLASSC(valuable);
|
1572 |
|
|
|
1573 |
|
|
if ((CdlValueFlavor_Bool == valuable->get_flavor()) || (CdlValueFlavor_BoolData == valuable->get_flavor())) {
|
1574 |
|
|
disable_transaction = transaction->make(this);
|
1575 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::set_valuable_bool(disable_transaction, valuable, false, level)) {
|
1576 |
|
|
// No luck here either.
|
1577 |
|
|
disable_transaction->cancel();
|
1578 |
|
|
delete disable_transaction;
|
1579 |
|
|
disable_transaction = 0;
|
1580 |
|
|
} else {
|
1581 |
|
|
if (!disable_transaction->user_confirmation_required()) {
|
1582 |
|
|
disable_transaction->commit();
|
1583 |
|
|
delete disable_transaction;
|
1584 |
|
|
if (0 != preferred_transaction) {
|
1585 |
|
|
preferred_transaction->cancel();
|
1586 |
|
|
delete preferred_transaction;
|
1587 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = 0;
|
1588 |
|
|
}
|
1589 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1590 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1591 |
|
|
return result;
|
1592 |
|
|
} else if (0 == preferred_transaction) {
|
1593 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = disable_transaction;
|
1594 |
|
|
} else if (!preferred_transaction->is_preferable_to(disable_transaction)) {
|
1595 |
|
|
preferred_transaction->cancel();
|
1596 |
|
|
delete preferred_transaction;
|
1597 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = disable_transaction;
|
1598 |
|
|
disable_transaction = 0;
|
1599 |
|
|
} else {
|
1600 |
|
|
disable_transaction->cancel();
|
1601 |
|
|
delete disable_transaction;
|
1602 |
|
|
disable_transaction = 0;
|
1603 |
|
|
}
|
1604 |
|
|
}
|
1605 |
|
|
}
|
1606 |
|
|
|
1607 |
|
|
// Now try for the inactive approach. This may work in cases where the disable
|
1608 |
|
|
// approach does not if e.g. there are dependencies between two nodes in the
|
1609 |
|
|
// same container, or if the source of the conflict is not boolean.
|
1610 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = transaction->make(this);
|
1611 |
|
|
if (!CdlInfer::make_inactive(inactive_transaction, valuable, level)) {
|
1612 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->cancel();
|
1613 |
|
|
delete inactive_transaction;
|
1614 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = 0;
|
1615 |
|
|
} else {
|
1616 |
|
|
if (!inactive_transaction->user_confirmation_required()) {
|
1617 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->commit();
|
1618 |
|
|
delete inactive_transaction;
|
1619 |
|
|
if (0 != preferred_transaction) {
|
1620 |
|
|
preferred_transaction->cancel();
|
1621 |
|
|
delete preferred_transaction;
|
1622 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = 0;
|
1623 |
|
|
}
|
1624 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1625 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1626 |
|
|
return result;
|
1627 |
|
|
} else if (0 == preferred_transaction) {
|
1628 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = inactive_transaction;
|
1629 |
|
|
} else if (!preferred_transaction->is_preferable_to(inactive_transaction)) {
|
1630 |
|
|
preferred_transaction->cancel();
|
1631 |
|
|
delete preferred_transaction;
|
1632 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = inactive_transaction;
|
1633 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = 0;
|
1634 |
|
|
} else {
|
1635 |
|
|
inactive_transaction->cancel();
|
1636 |
|
|
delete inactive_transaction;
|
1637 |
|
|
inactive_transaction = 0;
|
1638 |
|
|
}
|
1639 |
|
|
}
|
1640 |
|
|
|
1641 |
|
|
// Is there any solution at all? If so then use the currently-preferred one.
|
1642 |
|
|
if (0 != preferred_transaction) {
|
1643 |
|
|
preferred_transaction->commit();
|
1644 |
|
|
delete preferred_transaction;
|
1645 |
|
|
preferred_transaction = 0;
|
1646 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1647 |
|
|
}
|
1648 |
|
|
|
1649 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1650 |
|
|
return result;
|
1651 |
|
|
}
|
1652 |
|
|
|
1653 |
|
|
//}}}
|