OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_2011-10-31/openrisc_2011-10-31/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc_2011-10-31

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [rtos/] [ecos-2.0/] [tools/] [src/] [libcdl/] [testsuite/] [libcdl/] [cdl2.cxx] - Blame information for rev 248

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 26 unneback
//==========================================================================
2
//
3
//      cdl2.cxx
4
//
5
//      Tests for the CdlHandle class.
6
//
7
//==========================================================================
8
//####COPYRIGHTBEGIN####
9
//                                                                          
10
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
// Copyright (C) 1999, 2000 Red Hat, Inc.
12
//
13
// This file is part of the eCos host tools.
14
//
15
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it 
16
// under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free 
17
// Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) 
18
// any later version.
19
// 
20
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT 
21
// ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or 
22
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for 
23
// more details.
24
// 
25
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
26
// this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 
27
// 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307, USA.
28
//
29
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
30
//                                                                          
31
//####COPYRIGHTEND####
32
//==========================================================================
33
//#####DESCRIPTIONBEGIN####                                             
34
//
35
// Author(s):           bartv
36
// Contributors:        bartv
37
// Date:                1999-01-12
38
// Description:         Large parts of libcdl are implemented using a
39
//                      CdlHandle template and a CdlRefcountSupport class.
40
//                      This tests check that these both work as expected.
41
//
42
//####DESCRIPTIONEND####
43
//==========================================================================
44
 
45
#include <cstdio>
46
#include <cdlconfig.h>
47
#include <cdl.hxx>
48
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_ass.h>
49
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_trac.h>
50
#include <cyg/infra/testcase.h>
51
#include <cstdlib>
52
 
53
#ifndef CYGBLD_LIBCDL_USE_SMART_POINTERS
54
int
55
main(int argc, char** argv)
56
{
57
    CYG_TEST_FAIL_FINISH("Smart pointers not yet enabled - waiting for a working version of Visual C++");
58
    return EXIT_FAILURE;
59
}
60
#else // CYGBLD_LIBCDL_USE_SMART_POINTERS
61
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
62
// Miscellaneous statics.
63
 
64
// This routine controls the return value of a class1_body check_this()
65
// operation, allowing test code to make sure that using check_this()
66
// on a smart pointer works as expected.
67
static bool check_this_ok = true;
68
 
69
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
70
// This test case makes use of three implementation classes. It is necessary
71
// to have forward declarations of these, and then it is possible to define
72
// handle classes for each one.
73
class class01_body;
74
class class02_body;
75
class derived_body;
76
 
77
typedef CdlHandle<class01_body> class01;
78
typedef CdlHandle<class02_body> class02;
79
typedef CdlHandle<derived_body> derived;
80
 
81
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
82
// This test needs three additional classes which are reference-counted and
83
// which are accessed via CdlHandle smart pointers. It is necessary to start 
84
 
85
class class01_body : public CdlRefcountSupport {
86
 
87
    friend class CdlTest;
88
 
89
  public:
90
 
91
    static int class01_objects;
92
    class01_body() : CdlRefcountSupport() {
93
        class01_objects++;
94
        object_number = class01_objects;
95
        modifiable    = 0;
96
        class01_body_cookie = class01_body_magic;
97
    }
98
    ~class01_body() {
99
        class01_objects--;
100
        class01_body_cookie = class01_body_invalid;
101
    }
102
    int
103
    get_number(void) {
104
        return object_number;
105
    }
106
    void
107
    modify(void) {
108
        modifiable++;
109
    }
110
    bool check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const {
111
        CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(cyg_assert_class_zeal, zeal);
112
        if (class01_body_magic != class01_body_cookie) {
113
            return false;
114
        }
115
        return check_this_ok;
116
    }
117
 
118
  private:
119
    // Which object is this?
120
    int object_number;
121
    int modifiable;
122
 
123
    class01_body(const class01_body&);
124
    class01_body& operator=(const class01_body&);
125
    enum {
126
        class01_body_invalid     = 0,
127
        class01_body_magic       = 0x015b19d6
128
    } class01_body_cookie;
129
};
130
 
131
class class02_body : public CdlRefcountSupport {
132
 
133
    friend class CdlTest;
134
 
135
  public:
136
    static int class02_objects;
137
    class02_body() : CdlRefcountSupport() {
138
        class02_objects++;
139
        class02_body_cookie = class02_body_magic;
140
    }
141
    ~class02_body() {
142
        class02_objects--;
143
        class02_body_cookie = class02_body_invalid;
144
    }
145
 
146
    bool check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const {
147
        CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(cyg_assert_class_zeal, zeal);
148
        return class02_body_magic == class02_body_cookie;
149
    }
150
 
151
  private:
152
    class02_body(const class02_body&);
153
    class02_body& operator=(const class02_body&);
154
    enum {
155
        class02_body_invalid     = 0,
156
        class02_body_magic       = 0x3225c96c
157
    } class02_body_cookie;
158
};
159
 
160
class derived_body : public class01_body {
161
 
162
    friend class CdlTest;
163
 
164
  public:
165
    static int derived_objects;
166
    derived_body() : class01_body() {
167
        derived_objects++;
168
        derived_body_cookie = derived_body_magic;
169
    }
170
    ~derived_body() {
171
        derived_objects--;
172
        derived_body_cookie = derived_body_invalid;
173
    }
174
    bool check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const {
175
        if (derived_body_magic != derived_body_cookie) {
176
            return false;
177
        }
178
        return class01_body::check_this(zeal);
179
    }
180
 
181
  private:
182
    derived_body(const derived_body&);
183
    derived_body& operator=(const derived_body&);
184
    enum {
185
        derived_body_invalid    = 0,
186
        derived_body_magic      = 0x7ed15350
187
    } derived_body_cookie;
188
};
189
 
190
int class01_body::class01_objects   = 0;
191
int class02_body::class02_objects   = 0;
192
int derived_body::derived_objects   = 0;
193
 
194
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
195
// The actual test code.
196
 
197
bool
198
check_const_arg(const class01 const_ptr)
199
{
200
    // Make sure that read-only access is allowed and goes to the right
201
    // object
202
    if (!const_ptr->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
203
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("check_this() on a constant pointer should be fine");
204
        return false;
205
    }
206
    check_this_ok = false;
207
    if (const_ptr->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
208
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("check_this() on a constant pointer should be fine");
209
        check_this_ok = true;
210
        return false;
211
    }
212
    check_this_ok = true;
213
    return true;
214
}
215
 
216
int
217
main(int argc, char** argv)
218
{
219
    bool ok = true;
220
 
221
    // Make sure that smart pointers do not impose any kind of overhead.
222
    if ((sizeof(void *) != sizeof(class01)) ||
223
        (sizeof(void *) != sizeof(class02)) ||
224
        (sizeof(void *) != sizeof(derived))) {
225
 
226
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("smart pointers are not the same size as dumb pointers");
227
    } else {
228
        CYG_TEST_PASS("smart pointers are the same size as dumb pointers");
229
    }
230
 
231
    // Start by creating a number of objects to be manipulated.
232
    class01_body *      class01_obj1    = new class01_body;
233
    class01_body *      class01_obj2    = new class01_body;
234
    class02_body *      class02_obj1    = new class02_body;
235
    derived_body *      derived_obj1    = new derived_body;
236
 
237
    // Quick sanity check
238
    if ((1 != derived_body::derived_objects) ||
239
        (1 != class02_body::class02_objects) ||
240
        (3 != class01_body::class01_objects)) {
241
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Testcase has created an invalid number of objects");
242
    }
243
 
244
    // Convert the basic objects to smart pointers. If this code compiles
245
    // then the test succeeds.
246
    class01     class01_ptr1    = class01(class01_obj1);
247
    class01     class01_ptr2    = class01(class01_obj2);
248
    class02     class02_ptr1    = class02(class02_obj1);
249
    derived     derived_ptr1    = derived(derived_obj1);
250
    CYG_TEST_PASS("conversion to smart pointers works");
251
 
252
    // Also create a couple of other smart pointers. These should be
253
    // initialised to 0.
254
    class01      class01_ptr3;
255
    class01      class01_ptr4     = 0;
256
    class01      class01_ptr5     = class01(0);
257
    CYG_TEST_PASS("smart pointers can have the value zero");
258
 
259
    // Try to dereference the smart pointers.
260
    if ((1 != class01_ptr1->get_number()) ||
261
        (2 != class01_ptr2->get_number()) ||
262
        (3 != derived_ptr1->get_number())) {
263
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("-> dereferencing operator broken");
264
    } else {
265
        CYG_TEST_PASS("-> dereferencing operator functional");
266
    }
267
    if ((1 != (*class01_ptr1).get_number()) ||
268
        (2 != (*class01_ptr2).get_number()) ||
269
        (3 != (*derived_ptr1).get_number())) {
270
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("* dereferencing operator broken");
271
    } else {
272
        CYG_TEST_PASS("* dereferencing operator functional");
273
    }
274
 
275
    // Also try to access the check_this() member functions
276
    if (!class01_ptr1->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
277
    }
278
 
279
    // Do a couple of if's. This checks that the !operator is
280
    // functional. Some of the checks are there to make sure that the
281
    // compiler does the right thing.
282
    ok = true;
283
    if (!class01_ptr1) {
284
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("!(assigned smart pointer) is true");
285
        ok = false;
286
    }
287
    if (0 == class01_ptr1) {
288
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("0 == assigned smart pointer");
289
        ok = false;
290
    }
291
    if (0 != class01_ptr3) {
292
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("0 != unassigned smart pointer");
293
        ok = false;
294
    }
295
    if (class01_ptr1 == 0) {
296
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("0 == assigned smart pointer");
297
        ok = false;
298
    }
299
    if (class01_ptr3 != 0) {
300
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("0 != unassigned smart pointer");
301
        ok = false;
302
    }
303
    if (class01_ptr1 == class01_ptr2) {
304
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("comparing two different smart pointers succeeds");
305
        ok = false;
306
    }
307
    if (class01_ptr1 != class01_ptr2) {
308
        // Do nothing
309
    } else {
310
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("comparing two different smart pointers succeeds");
311
        ok = false;
312
    }
313
#if 0
314
    // Comparing base and derived smart pointers directly does not work yet.
315
    if (class01_ptr1 == derived_ptr1) {
316
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("comparing different base and derived pointers succeeds");
317
    }
318
#endif
319
    if (ok) {
320
        CYG_TEST_PASS("smart pointer comparisons work");
321
    }
322
 
323
    // Try some  assignment operators.
324
    class01_ptr3 = class01_ptr1;
325
    class01_ptr4 = derived_ptr1;
326
    class01_ptr5 = class01_ptr2;
327
 
328
    // After doing all of these assignments there should be no change in
329
    // the number of underlying objects.
330
    ok = true;
331
    if ((1 != derived_body::derived_objects) ||
332
        (1 != class02_body::class02_objects)   ||
333
        (3 != class01_body::class01_objects)) {
334
        ok = false;
335
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Assignment of smart pointers has changed the underlying number of objects");
336
    }
337
    if ((class01_ptr1 != class01_ptr3) ||
338
        (class01_ptr2 != class01_ptr5)) {
339
        ok = false;
340
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Assignment of smart pointers has not worked");
341
    }
342
    if (class01_ptr4.get_dumb_pointer() != derived_ptr1.get_dumb_pointer()) {
343
        ok = false;
344
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Assignment of derived to base smart pointer has not worked");
345
    }
346
    if ((2 != class01_ptr1->get_refcount()) ||
347
        (2 != class01_ptr2->get_refcount()) ||
348
        (2 != class01_ptr4->get_refcount()) ||
349
        (2 != derived_ptr1->get_refcount())) {
350
        ok = false;
351
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Reference counts after assignment operators do not match up");
352
    }
353
    if (ok) {
354
        CYG_TEST_PASS("Assignment of smart pointers");
355
    }
356
 
357
    // Now try assigning zero. Incidentally this is necessary if the underlying
358
    // objects are to be destroyed again at the end.
359
    class01_ptr3 = 0;
360
    class01_ptr4 = 0;
361
    class01_ptr5 = 0;
362
 
363
    ok = true;
364
    if (0 != class01_ptr3) {
365
        ok = false;
366
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("assigning 0 to a smart pointer does not work");
367
    }
368
    if ((1 != class01_ptr1->get_refcount()) ||
369
        (1 != class01_ptr2->get_refcount()) ||
370
        (1 != derived_ptr1->get_refcount())) {
371
        ok = false;
372
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("Reference counts after assignment operators do not match up");
373
    }
374
    if (ok) {
375
        CYG_TEST_PASS("Assigning zero to smart pointers");
376
    }
377
 
378
    // Make sure that implicit casts to const work. This is really
379
    // a compiler test.
380
    if (check_const_arg(class01_ptr1) &&
381
        check_const_arg(derived_ptr1)) {
382
        CYG_TEST_PASS("Implicit cast to const smart pointer");
383
    }
384
 
385
#if 0
386
    // All of this code should fail to compile.
387
    // Applying delete to a smart pointer does not work. Use destroy() instead.
388
    delete class01_ptr1;
389
#endif
390
#if 0
391
    // Attempts to do incompatible assignments should fail.
392
    class01_ptr1 = class02_ptr1;
393
#endif
394
#if 0    
395
    // Comparing completely different types should fail.
396
    if (class01_ptr1 == class02_ptr1) {
397
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("it should not be possible to compare objects of different types");
398
    }
399
#endif
400
#if 0
401
    {
402
        const class01 const_class01_ptr = class01_ptr1;
403
        const_class01_ptr->modify();
404
    }
405
#endif
406
#if 0
407
    {
408
        const class01 const_derived_ptr = derived_ptr1;
409
        const_derived_ptr->modify();
410
    }
411
#endif
412
 
413
    // Check that destroy() actually gets rid of the underlying objects.
414
    class01_ptr1.destroy();
415
    class01_ptr2.destroy();
416
    class02_ptr1.destroy();
417
    derived_ptr1.destroy();
418
    if ((0 != derived_body::derived_objects) ||
419
        (0 != class02_body::class02_objects)    ||
420
        (0 != class01_body::class01_objects)) {
421
        CYG_TEST_FAIL("There are still objects after the smart pointers have been destroyed");
422
    } else {
423
        CYG_TEST_PASS("Using destroy() on the smart pointers cleans up the underlying objects");
424
    }
425
 
426
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
427
}
428
#endif

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.