1 |
786 |
skrzyp |
//{{{ Banner
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
4 |
|
|
//
|
5 |
|
|
// conflict.cxx
|
6 |
|
|
//
|
7 |
|
|
// The CdlConflict class
|
8 |
|
|
//
|
9 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
10 |
|
|
// ####ECOSHOSTGPLCOPYRIGHTBEGIN####
|
11 |
|
|
// -------------------------------------------
|
12 |
|
|
// This file is part of the eCos host tools.
|
13 |
|
|
// Copyright (C) 1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
14 |
|
|
//
|
15 |
|
|
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
16 |
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
17 |
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 or (at your option) any
|
18 |
|
|
// later version.
|
19 |
|
|
//
|
20 |
|
|
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
|
21 |
|
|
// WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
22 |
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
23 |
|
|
// General Public License for more details.
|
24 |
|
|
//
|
25 |
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
26 |
|
|
// along with this program; if not, write to the
|
27 |
|
|
// Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street,
|
28 |
|
|
// Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
|
29 |
|
|
// -------------------------------------------
|
30 |
|
|
// ####ECOSHOSTGPLCOPYRIGHTEND####
|
31 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
32 |
|
|
//#####DESCRIPTIONBEGIN####
|
33 |
|
|
//
|
34 |
|
|
// Author(s): bartv
|
35 |
|
|
// Contact(s): bartv
|
36 |
|
|
// Date: 1999/01/28
|
37 |
|
|
// Version: 0.02
|
38 |
|
|
//
|
39 |
|
|
//####DESCRIPTIONEND####
|
40 |
|
|
//============================================================================
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
//}}}
|
43 |
|
|
//{{{ #include's
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
46 |
|
|
#include "cdlconfig.h"
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
// Get the infrastructure types, assertions, tracing and similar
|
49 |
|
|
// facilities.
|
50 |
|
|
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_ass.h>
|
51 |
|
|
#include <cyg/infra/cyg_trac.h>
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
// <cdlcore.hxx> defines everything implemented in this module.
|
54 |
|
|
// It implicitly supplies <string>, <vector> and <map> because
|
55 |
|
|
// the class definitions rely on these headers. It also brings
|
56 |
|
|
// in <tcl.h>
|
57 |
|
|
#include <cdlcore.hxx>
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
//}}}
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
//{{{ Statics
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
64 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflictBody);
|
65 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody);
|
66 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody);
|
67 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody);
|
68 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflict_RequiresBody);
|
69 |
|
|
CYGDBG_DEFINE_MEMLEAK_COUNTER(CdlConflict_DataBody);
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
//}}}
|
72 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
//{{{ Creation and destruction
|
75 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
77 |
|
|
// The basic conflicts. Conflicts are created in the context of a transaction.
|
78 |
|
|
// If the transaction gets committed then they are transferred to a toplevel.
|
79 |
|
|
// If the transaction gets cancelled then they just disappear.
|
80 |
|
|
//
|
81 |
|
|
// A conflict that is only part of a transaction may go away as that
|
82 |
|
|
// transaction proceeds, in which case it can be deleted immediately.
|
83 |
|
|
// A conflict that is already part of the toplevel cannot be
|
84 |
|
|
// destroyed, instead it gets marked in the transaction object. Only
|
85 |
|
|
// when the transaction is committed does the object get deleted.
|
86 |
|
|
// In addition within the context of a transaction old conflicts
|
87 |
|
|
// may hang around for a while.
|
88 |
|
|
//
|
89 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::CdlConflictBody(CdlTransaction trans_arg, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty property_arg, bool structural_arg)
|
91 |
|
|
{
|
92 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict:: constructor");
|
93 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG4XV(this, trans_arg, node_arg, property_arg);
|
94 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(trans_arg);
|
95 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(node_arg);
|
96 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(property_arg);
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
node = node_arg;
|
99 |
|
|
property = property_arg;
|
100 |
|
|
transaction = trans_arg;
|
101 |
|
|
structural = structural_arg;
|
102 |
|
|
no_solution = false;
|
103 |
|
|
// The vectors take care of themselves
|
104 |
|
|
enabled = true;
|
105 |
|
|
reason = "";
|
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
transaction->dirty = true;
|
108 |
|
|
if (structural_arg) {
|
109 |
|
|
transaction->new_structural_conflicts.push_back(this);
|
110 |
|
|
} else {
|
111 |
|
|
transaction->new_conflicts.push_back(this);
|
112 |
|
|
}
|
113 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
cdlconflictbody_cookie = CdlConflictBody_Magic;
|
115 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
116 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
118 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
119 |
|
|
}
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
123 |
|
|
// The destructor can get invoked during a transaction commit, in the
|
124 |
|
|
// case of a global conflict, or from inside clear() for a per-transaction
|
125 |
|
|
// conflict. In all cases the calling code is responsible for removing
|
126 |
|
|
// the conflict from any STL containers.
|
127 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::~CdlConflictBody()
|
129 |
|
|
{
|
130 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict:: destructor");
|
131 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
132 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
133 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
cdlconflictbody_cookie = CdlConflictBody_Invalid;
|
135 |
|
|
reason = "";
|
136 |
|
|
enabled = false;
|
137 |
|
|
no_solution = false;
|
138 |
|
|
solution.clear();
|
139 |
|
|
solution_references.clear();
|
140 |
|
|
structural = false;
|
141 |
|
|
transaction = 0;
|
142 |
|
|
property = 0;
|
143 |
|
|
node = 0;
|
144 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
145 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
147 |
|
|
}
|
148 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
//}}}
|
150 |
|
|
//{{{ Solution support
|
151 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
153 |
|
|
bool
|
154 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::has_known_solution() const
|
155 |
|
|
{
|
156 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::has_solution", "result %d");
|
157 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
158 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
bool result = (0 != solution.size());
|
161 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
163 |
|
|
return result;
|
164 |
|
|
}
|
165 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
bool
|
167 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::has_no_solution() const
|
168 |
|
|
{
|
169 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::has_no_solution", "result %d");
|
170 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
171 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
172 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
bool result = no_solution;
|
174 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
176 |
|
|
return result;
|
177 |
|
|
}
|
178 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
const std::vector<std::pair<CdlValuable, CdlValue> >&
|
180 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_solution() const
|
181 |
|
|
{
|
182 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::get_solution");
|
183 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
184 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
185 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
187 |
|
|
return solution;
|
188 |
|
|
}
|
189 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
const std::set<CdlValuable>&
|
191 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_solution_references() const
|
192 |
|
|
{
|
193 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::get_solution_references");
|
194 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
195 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
198 |
|
|
return solution_references;
|
199 |
|
|
}
|
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
202 |
|
|
// Try to resolve a conflict. If the conflict was created in a transaction,
|
203 |
|
|
// use that transaction. More commonly the conflict will be global and
|
204 |
|
|
// a new transaction will have to be created specially for it. Either
|
205 |
|
|
// way the conflict may cease to exist.
|
206 |
|
|
void
|
207 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::resolve()
|
208 |
|
|
{
|
209 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::resolve");
|
210 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
211 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
212 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(0 == transaction);
|
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
if (this->resolution_implemented()) {
|
215 |
|
|
CdlTransaction transact = CdlTransactionBody::make(this->get_node()->get_toplevel());
|
216 |
|
|
transact->resolve(this);
|
217 |
|
|
transact->body();
|
218 |
|
|
delete transact;
|
219 |
|
|
}
|
220 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
222 |
|
|
}
|
223 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
225 |
|
|
// A valuable has just been changed. If this value was relevant to the
|
226 |
|
|
// current solution (or lack thereof) then an update is necessary.
|
227 |
|
|
void
|
228 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::update_solution_validity(CdlValuable valuable)
|
229 |
|
|
{
|
230 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::update_solution_validity");
|
231 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG2XV(this, valuable);
|
232 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
if (solution_references.find(valuable) != solution_references.end()) {
|
235 |
|
|
no_solution = false;
|
236 |
|
|
solution.clear();
|
237 |
|
|
solution_references.clear();
|
238 |
|
|
}
|
239 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
241 |
|
|
}
|
242 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
244 |
|
|
// Default implementations of the inference engine do not do a lot...
|
245 |
|
|
bool
|
246 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::inner_resolve(CdlTransaction trans_arg, int level)
|
247 |
|
|
{
|
248 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::inner_resolve", "result false");
|
249 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG3XV(this, trans_arg, level);
|
250 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
251 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(trans_arg);
|
252 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
// Setting the no_solution flag while keeping a clear
|
254 |
|
|
// solution_accessed vector means that the no_solution flag should
|
255 |
|
|
// always remain set, and hence no further inference attempts will be made.
|
256 |
|
|
no_solution = true;
|
257 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
259 |
|
|
return false;
|
260 |
|
|
}
|
261 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
bool
|
263 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::resolution_implemented() const
|
264 |
|
|
{
|
265 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::resolution_implemented", "result %d");
|
266 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
267 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(false);
|
270 |
|
|
return false;
|
271 |
|
|
}
|
272 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
274 |
|
|
// Clearing a solution. This is needed if the inference engine has
|
275 |
|
|
// failed to find a complete solution, because in attempting this the
|
276 |
|
|
// solution_references vector will have been filled in anyway. It may
|
277 |
|
|
// have some other uses as well.
|
278 |
|
|
void
|
279 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::clear_solution()
|
280 |
|
|
{
|
281 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::clear_solution");
|
282 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
283 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
284 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
no_solution = false;
|
286 |
|
|
solution.clear();
|
287 |
|
|
solution_references.clear();
|
288 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
290 |
|
|
}
|
291 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
//}}}
|
293 |
|
|
//{{{ Basics
|
294 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
296 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
CdlNode
|
298 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_node() const
|
299 |
|
|
{
|
300 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::get_node", "result %p");
|
301 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
302 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
303 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
CdlNode result = node;
|
305 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
306 |
|
|
return result;
|
307 |
|
|
}
|
308 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
CdlProperty
|
310 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_property() const
|
311 |
|
|
{
|
312 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::get_property", "result %p");
|
313 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
314 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
315 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
CdlProperty result = property;
|
317 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
318 |
|
|
return result;
|
319 |
|
|
}
|
320 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
bool
|
322 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::is_structural() const
|
323 |
|
|
{
|
324 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::is_structural", "result %d");
|
325 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
326 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
327 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
bool result = structural;
|
329 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
330 |
|
|
return result;
|
331 |
|
|
}
|
332 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
CdlTransaction
|
334 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_transaction() const
|
335 |
|
|
{
|
336 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::get_transaction", "result %p");
|
337 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
338 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
339 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
CdlTransaction result = transaction;
|
341 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
342 |
|
|
return result;
|
343 |
|
|
}
|
344 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
// FIXME: these are not currently implemented. It would be necessary
|
346 |
|
|
// to store the information in the savefile, which requires an
|
347 |
|
|
// unambiguous way of identifying a conflict that is likely to
|
348 |
|
|
// survice package version changes.
|
349 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
bool
|
351 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::is_enabled() const
|
352 |
|
|
{
|
353 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict::is_enabled", "result %d");
|
354 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
355 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
356 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
bool result = enabled;
|
358 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
359 |
|
|
return result;
|
360 |
|
|
}
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
std::string
|
363 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::get_disabled_reason() const
|
364 |
|
|
{
|
365 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::get_disabled_reason");
|
366 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
367 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
368 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
// Possibly there should be a check that the conflict is currently
|
370 |
|
|
// disabled, but it might be useful.
|
371 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
372 |
|
|
return reason;
|
373 |
|
|
}
|
374 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
void
|
376 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::disable(std::string reason_arg)
|
377 |
|
|
{
|
378 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::disable");
|
379 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
380 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
381 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
reason = reason_arg;
|
383 |
|
|
enabled = false;
|
384 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
386 |
|
|
}
|
387 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
void
|
389 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::enable()
|
390 |
|
|
{
|
391 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::enable");
|
392 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
393 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
394 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
enabled = true;
|
396 |
|
|
// Leave "reason" alone, it may still be useful
|
397 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
399 |
|
|
}
|
400 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
//}}}
|
402 |
|
|
//{{{ check_this()
|
403 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
405 |
|
|
bool
|
406 |
|
|
CdlConflictBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
407 |
|
|
{
|
408 |
|
|
if (CdlConflictBody_Magic != cdlconflictbody_cookie) {
|
409 |
|
|
return false;
|
410 |
|
|
}
|
411 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
412 |
|
|
if ((0 == node) || (0 == property)) {
|
413 |
|
|
return false;
|
414 |
|
|
}
|
415 |
|
|
switch(zeal) {
|
416 |
|
|
case cyg_system_test :
|
417 |
|
|
case cyg_extreme :
|
418 |
|
|
{
|
419 |
|
|
if (!node->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
|
420 |
|
|
return false;
|
421 |
|
|
}
|
422 |
|
|
// Accessing the properties would involve a function call.
|
423 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
if (0 != transaction) {
|
425 |
|
|
if (!transaction->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
|
426 |
|
|
return false;
|
427 |
|
|
}
|
428 |
|
|
if (structural) {
|
429 |
|
|
// The conflict should exist in the new_structural_conflicts vector
|
430 |
|
|
// deleted_structural_conflicts is for toplevel ones.
|
431 |
|
|
if (std::find(transaction->new_structural_conflicts.begin(),
|
432 |
|
|
transaction->new_structural_conflicts.end(), this) ==
|
433 |
|
|
transaction->new_structural_conflicts.end()) {
|
434 |
|
|
return false;
|
435 |
|
|
}
|
436 |
|
|
} else {
|
437 |
|
|
// The conflict may appear on the new_conflicts list
|
438 |
|
|
// or in the resolved_conflicts vector.
|
439 |
|
|
if (std::find(transaction->new_conflicts.begin(), transaction->new_conflicts.end(), this) ==
|
440 |
|
|
transaction->new_conflicts.end()) {
|
441 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
if (std::find(transaction->resolved_conflicts.begin(), transaction->resolved_conflicts.end(), this) ==
|
443 |
|
|
transaction->resolved_conflicts.end()) {
|
444 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
return false;
|
446 |
|
|
}
|
447 |
|
|
}
|
448 |
|
|
}
|
449 |
|
|
}
|
450 |
|
|
// Checking the toplevel lists would be good, but involves a
|
451 |
|
|
// further function call and hence nested assertions.
|
452 |
|
|
}
|
453 |
|
|
case cyg_thorough :
|
454 |
|
|
{
|
455 |
|
|
if (!node->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
|
456 |
|
|
return false;
|
457 |
|
|
}
|
458 |
|
|
if (!property->check_this(cyg_quick)) {
|
459 |
|
|
return false;
|
460 |
|
|
}
|
461 |
|
|
}
|
462 |
|
|
case cyg_quick :
|
463 |
|
|
{
|
464 |
|
|
if (no_solution && (0 != solution.size())) {
|
465 |
|
|
return false;
|
466 |
|
|
}
|
467 |
|
|
}
|
468 |
|
|
case cyg_trivial :
|
469 |
|
|
case cyg_none :
|
470 |
|
|
default:
|
471 |
|
|
break;
|
472 |
|
|
}
|
473 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
return true;
|
475 |
|
|
}
|
476 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
//}}}
|
478 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
//}}}
|
480 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict_Unresolved
|
481 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
483 |
|
|
// Unresolved references. Usually unresolved references occur inside
|
484 |
|
|
// expressions, but other properties that may be affected are parent,
|
485 |
|
|
// dialog and wizard.
|
486 |
|
|
//
|
487 |
|
|
// It is possible for a single expression to have multiple unresolved
|
488 |
|
|
// references, each of which will result in a separate conflict
|
489 |
|
|
// object. It is also possible for an expression to refer to the same
|
490 |
|
|
// unknown entity twice or more, in which case there would also be
|
491 |
|
|
// separate conflict objects. Unresolved references may also result in
|
492 |
|
|
// eval exceptions and in failed requires statements. Trying to cope
|
493 |
|
|
// with the various combinations as a single conflict seems too
|
494 |
|
|
// error-prone.
|
495 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
void
|
497 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::make(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg, std::string name_arg)
|
498 |
|
|
{
|
499 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Unresolved tmp = new CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, name_arg);
|
500 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlConflict_Unresolved, tmp);
|
501 |
|
|
}
|
502 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody(CdlTransaction trans_arg, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg,
|
504 |
|
|
std::string target_name_arg)
|
505 |
|
|
: CdlConflictBody(trans_arg, node_arg, prop_arg, true)
|
506 |
|
|
{
|
507 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Unresolved:: constructor");
|
508 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
509 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC("" != target_name_arg);
|
510 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
target_name = target_name_arg;
|
512 |
|
|
cdlconflict_unresolvedbody_cookie = CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody_Magic;
|
513 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
514 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
516 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
517 |
|
|
}
|
518 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::~CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody()
|
520 |
|
|
{
|
521 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Unresolved:: destructor");
|
522 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
523 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
524 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
cdlconflict_unresolvedbody_cookie = CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody_Invalid;
|
526 |
|
|
target_name = "";
|
527 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
528 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
530 |
|
|
}
|
531 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
std::string
|
533 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::get_target_name() const
|
534 |
|
|
{
|
535 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Unresolved::get_target_name");
|
536 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
537 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
538 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
540 |
|
|
return target_name;
|
541 |
|
|
}
|
542 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
// For now, just report the node and property name, a brief text, and the
|
544 |
|
|
// entity being referenced.
|
545 |
|
|
//
|
546 |
|
|
// Eventually we can do clever things like looking up the name in a
|
547 |
|
|
// database.
|
548 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
std::string
|
550 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::get_explanation() const
|
551 |
|
|
{
|
552 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Unresolved::get_explanation");
|
553 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
554 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
555 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
std::string result;
|
557 |
|
|
result = node->get_name() + ", property " + property->get_property_name() +
|
558 |
|
|
":\nReference to unknown object " + target_name;
|
559 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
561 |
|
|
return result;
|
562 |
|
|
}
|
563 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
bool
|
565 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
566 |
|
|
{
|
567 |
|
|
if (CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody_Magic != cdlconflict_unresolvedbody_cookie) {
|
568 |
|
|
return false;
|
569 |
|
|
}
|
570 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
571 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
// There is not a lot of checking that can be done on the name.
|
573 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
return CdlConflictBody::check_this(zeal);
|
575 |
|
|
}
|
576 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
bool
|
578 |
|
|
CdlConflict_UnresolvedBody::test(CdlConflict conf)
|
579 |
|
|
{
|
580 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_Unresolved::test", "result %d");
|
581 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(conf);
|
582 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(conf);
|
583 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
585 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Unresolved tmp = dynamic_cast<CdlConflict_Unresolved>(conf);
|
586 |
|
|
if (0 != tmp) {
|
587 |
|
|
result = true;
|
588 |
|
|
}
|
589 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
591 |
|
|
return result;
|
592 |
|
|
}
|
593 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
//}}}
|
595 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict_IllegalValue
|
596 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
598 |
|
|
// A valuable object has an illegal value. This can happen because the
|
599 |
|
|
// current value is not within the legal_values list, or because of a
|
600 |
|
|
// failure of check_proc or entry_proc. In the latter two cases the
|
601 |
|
|
// Tcl code should supply an explanation as to why the value is illegal.
|
602 |
|
|
//
|
603 |
|
|
// Note: if future variants of CDL implement some concept of a value
|
604 |
|
|
// that does not match the CdlValuable class then that will need a
|
605 |
|
|
// separate CdlConflict derived class.
|
606 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
void
|
608 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::make(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg)
|
609 |
|
|
{
|
610 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValue tmp = new CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg);
|
611 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlConflict_IllegalValue, tmp);
|
612 |
|
|
}
|
613 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg)
|
615 |
|
|
: CdlConflictBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, false)
|
616 |
|
|
{
|
617 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_IllegalValue:: constructor");
|
618 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
619 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(0 != dynamic_cast<CdlValuable>(node_arg));
|
620 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
explanation = "";
|
622 |
|
|
cdlconflict_illegalvaluebody_cookie = CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody_Magic;
|
623 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
624 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
626 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
627 |
|
|
}
|
628 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::~CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody()
|
630 |
|
|
{
|
631 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_IllegalValue:: destructor");
|
632 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
633 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
634 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
cdlconflict_illegalvaluebody_cookie = CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody_Invalid;
|
636 |
|
|
explanation = "";
|
637 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
638 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
640 |
|
|
}
|
641 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
643 |
|
|
// If the property is legal_values then it should be a list expression
|
644 |
|
|
// property. Display the current value and the original expression.
|
645 |
|
|
//
|
646 |
|
|
// If the property is check_proc or entry_proc, the Tcl code should
|
647 |
|
|
// have produced an explanation string and stored it in the conflict
|
648 |
|
|
// object.
|
649 |
|
|
std::string
|
650 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::get_explanation() const
|
651 |
|
|
{
|
652 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_IllegalValue::get_explanation()");
|
653 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
654 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
655 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
CdlConstValuable valuable = dynamic_cast<CdlConstValuable>(node);
|
657 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERTC(0 != valuable);
|
658 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
std::string result = "";
|
660 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
// FIXME: analyse the current value and flavor a bit more
|
662 |
|
|
result += "Illegal current value " + valuable->get_value() + "\n";
|
663 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
if (CdlPropertyId_LegalValues == property->get_property_name()) {
|
665 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
CdlConstProperty_ListExpression expr = dynamic_cast<CdlConstProperty_ListExpression>(property);
|
667 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERTC(0 != expr);
|
668 |
|
|
result += "Legal values are: " + expr->get_original_string();
|
669 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
} else if (explanation != "") {
|
671 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
result += explanation;
|
673 |
|
|
} else {
|
674 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
CYG_FAIL("Inexplicable illegal value");
|
676 |
|
|
}
|
677 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
679 |
|
|
return result;
|
680 |
|
|
}
|
681 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
void
|
683 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::set_explanation(std::string explanation_arg)
|
684 |
|
|
{
|
685 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_IllegalValue::set_explanation");
|
686 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
687 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
688 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
explanation = explanation_arg;
|
690 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
692 |
|
|
}
|
693 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
695 |
|
|
// Inference is implemented. The actual inference code is in infer.cxx
|
696 |
|
|
bool
|
697 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::resolution_implemented() const
|
698 |
|
|
{
|
699 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_IllegalValue::resolution_implemented");
|
700 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
701 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
702 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
704 |
|
|
return true;
|
705 |
|
|
}
|
706 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
708 |
|
|
bool
|
709 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
710 |
|
|
{
|
711 |
|
|
if (CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody_Magic != cdlconflict_illegalvaluebody_cookie) {
|
712 |
|
|
return false;
|
713 |
|
|
}
|
714 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
715 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
return CdlConflictBody::check_this(zeal);
|
717 |
|
|
}
|
718 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
bool
|
720 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValueBody::test(CdlConflict conf)
|
721 |
|
|
{
|
722 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_IllegalValue::test", "result %d");
|
723 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(conf);
|
724 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(conf);
|
725 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
727 |
|
|
CdlConflict_IllegalValue tmp = dynamic_cast<CdlConflict_IllegalValue>(conf);
|
728 |
|
|
if (0 != tmp) {
|
729 |
|
|
result = true;
|
730 |
|
|
}
|
731 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
733 |
|
|
return result;
|
734 |
|
|
}
|
735 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
//}}}
|
737 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict_EvalException
|
738 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
740 |
|
|
// Run-time expression failures are possible because of division by
|
741 |
|
|
// zero, if for no other reason. The evaluation code should have
|
742 |
|
|
// stored a suitable diagnostic with the conflict. This is not part
|
743 |
|
|
// of the constructor, allowing the conflict object to be re-used
|
744 |
|
|
// if the detailed reason changes
|
745 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
void
|
747 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::make(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg, std::string msg_arg)
|
748 |
|
|
{
|
749 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalException tmp = new CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, msg_arg);
|
750 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlConflict_EvalException, tmp);
|
751 |
|
|
}
|
752 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg,
|
754 |
|
|
std::string msg_arg)
|
755 |
|
|
: CdlConflictBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, false)
|
756 |
|
|
{
|
757 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_EvalException");
|
758 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
759 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
explanation = msg_arg;
|
761 |
|
|
cdlconflict_evalexceptionbody_cookie = CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody_Magic;
|
762 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
763 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
765 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
766 |
|
|
}
|
767 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::~CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody()
|
769 |
|
|
{
|
770 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_EvalException");
|
771 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
772 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
773 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
cdlconflict_evalexceptionbody_cookie = CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody_Invalid;
|
775 |
|
|
explanation = "";
|
776 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
777 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
779 |
|
|
}
|
780 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
// If there has been an eval exception then the property must be an
|
782 |
|
|
// ordinary expression, a list expression, or a goal expression
|
783 |
|
|
std::string
|
784 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::get_explanation() const
|
785 |
|
|
{
|
786 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_EvalException::get_explanation");
|
787 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
788 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
789 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
std::string result = node->get_name() + ", property " + property->get_property_name() + "\n";
|
791 |
|
|
result += "Error while evaluating expression: ";
|
792 |
|
|
if ("" != explanation) {
|
793 |
|
|
result += explanation;
|
794 |
|
|
}
|
795 |
|
|
result += "\n";
|
796 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
if (CdlConstProperty_Expression expr = dynamic_cast<CdlConstProperty_Expression>(property)) {
|
798 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
result += "Expression: " + expr->get_original_string();
|
800 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
} else if (CdlConstProperty_ListExpression lexpr = dynamic_cast<CdlConstProperty_ListExpression>(property)) {
|
802 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
result += "List expression: " + lexpr->get_original_string();
|
804 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
} else if (CdlConstProperty_GoalExpression gexpr = dynamic_cast<CdlConstProperty_GoalExpression>(property)) {
|
806 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
result += "Goal expression: " + gexpr->get_original_string();
|
808 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
} else {
|
810 |
|
|
CYG_FAIL("Unknown expression type");
|
811 |
|
|
}
|
812 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
814 |
|
|
return result;
|
815 |
|
|
}
|
816 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
void
|
818 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::set_explanation(std::string explanation_arg)
|
819 |
|
|
{
|
820 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_EvalException::set_explanation");
|
821 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
822 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
823 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
explanation = explanation_arg;
|
825 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
827 |
|
|
}
|
828 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
bool
|
830 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
831 |
|
|
{
|
832 |
|
|
if (CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody_Magic != cdlconflict_evalexceptionbody_cookie) {
|
833 |
|
|
return false;
|
834 |
|
|
}
|
835 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
836 |
|
|
return CdlConflictBody::check_this(zeal);
|
837 |
|
|
}
|
838 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
bool
|
840 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalExceptionBody::test(CdlConflict conf)
|
841 |
|
|
{
|
842 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_EvalException::test", "result %d");
|
843 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(conf);
|
844 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(conf);
|
845 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
847 |
|
|
CdlConflict_EvalException tmp = dynamic_cast<CdlConflict_EvalException>(conf);
|
848 |
|
|
if (0 != tmp) {
|
849 |
|
|
result = true;
|
850 |
|
|
}
|
851 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
853 |
|
|
return result;
|
854 |
|
|
}
|
855 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
//}}}
|
857 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict_Requires
|
858 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
860 |
|
|
// A requires constraint is not satisfied. Producing a decent diagnostic
|
861 |
|
|
// here requires a detailed understanding of goal expressions. For now
|
862 |
|
|
// there is no extra data associated with goal expressions.
|
863 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
void
|
865 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::make(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg)
|
866 |
|
|
{
|
867 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Requires tmp = new CdlConflict_RequiresBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg);
|
868 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlConflict_Requires, tmp);
|
869 |
|
|
}
|
870 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::CdlConflict_RequiresBody(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg)
|
872 |
|
|
: CdlConflictBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, false)
|
873 |
|
|
{
|
874 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Requires:: constructor");
|
875 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
876 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC(0 != dynamic_cast<CdlProperty_GoalExpression>(prop_arg));
|
877 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
cdlconflict_requiresbody_cookie = CdlConflict_RequiresBody_Magic;
|
879 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
880 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
882 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
883 |
|
|
}
|
884 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::~CdlConflict_RequiresBody()
|
886 |
|
|
{
|
887 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Requires:: destructor");
|
888 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
889 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
890 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
cdlconflict_requiresbody_cookie = CdlConflict_RequiresBody_Invalid;
|
892 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
893 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
895 |
|
|
}
|
896 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
// FIXME: implement properly
|
898 |
|
|
std::string
|
899 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::get_explanation() const
|
900 |
|
|
{
|
901 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict::get_explanation");
|
902 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
903 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
904 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
CdlConstProperty_GoalExpression gexpr = dynamic_cast<CdlConstProperty_GoalExpression>(property);
|
906 |
|
|
CYG_ASSERTC(0 != gexpr);
|
907 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
std::string result = "";
|
909 |
|
|
result += "\"requires\" constraint not satisfied: " + gexpr->get_original_string();
|
910 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
912 |
|
|
return result;
|
913 |
|
|
}
|
914 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
// Inference is implemented, see infer.cxx
|
916 |
|
|
bool
|
917 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::resolution_implemented() const
|
918 |
|
|
{
|
919 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Requires");
|
920 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
921 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
922 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
924 |
|
|
return true;
|
925 |
|
|
}
|
926 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
bool
|
928 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
929 |
|
|
{
|
930 |
|
|
if (CdlConflict_RequiresBody_Magic != cdlconflict_requiresbody_cookie) {
|
931 |
|
|
return false;
|
932 |
|
|
}
|
933 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
934 |
|
|
return CdlConflictBody::check_this(zeal);
|
935 |
|
|
}
|
936 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
bool
|
938 |
|
|
CdlConflict_RequiresBody::test(CdlConflict conf)
|
939 |
|
|
{
|
940 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_Requires::test", "result %d");
|
941 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(conf);
|
942 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(conf);
|
943 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
945 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Requires tmp = dynamic_cast<CdlConflict_Requires>(conf);
|
946 |
|
|
if (0 != tmp) {
|
947 |
|
|
result = true;
|
948 |
|
|
}
|
949 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
951 |
|
|
return result;
|
952 |
|
|
}
|
953 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
//}}}
|
955 |
|
|
//{{{ CdlConflict_Data
|
956 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
958 |
|
|
// There is some strange problem in the configuration data, for example
|
959 |
|
|
// a parent property that is resolved but the target is not a container.
|
960 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
void
|
962 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::make(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg, std::string message_arg)
|
963 |
|
|
{
|
964 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Data tmp = new CdlConflict_DataBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, message_arg);
|
965 |
|
|
CYG_UNUSED_PARAM(CdlConflict_Data, tmp);
|
966 |
|
|
}
|
967 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::CdlConflict_DataBody(CdlTransaction trans, CdlNode node_arg, CdlProperty prop_arg,
|
969 |
|
|
std::string message_arg)
|
970 |
|
|
: CdlConflictBody(trans, node_arg, prop_arg, true)
|
971 |
|
|
{
|
972 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Data:: constructor");
|
973 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
974 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITIONC("" != message_arg);
|
975 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
message = message_arg;
|
977 |
|
|
cdlconflict_databody_cookie = CdlConflict_DataBody_Magic;
|
978 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CONSTRUCTOR();
|
979 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
CYG_POSTCONDITION_THISC();
|
981 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
982 |
|
|
}
|
983 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::~CdlConflict_DataBody()
|
985 |
|
|
{
|
986 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_ata: destructor");
|
987 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
988 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
989 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
cdlconflict_databody_cookie = CdlConflict_DataBody_Invalid;
|
991 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_DESTRUCTOR();
|
992 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
994 |
|
|
}
|
995 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
std::string
|
997 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::get_explanation() const
|
998 |
|
|
{
|
999 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAME("CdlConflict_Data::get_explanation");
|
1000 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(this);
|
1001 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_THISC();
|
1002 |
|
|
|
1003 |
|
|
std::string result = message;
|
1004 |
|
|
|
1005 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETURN();
|
1006 |
|
|
return result;
|
1007 |
|
|
}
|
1008 |
|
|
|
1009 |
|
|
bool
|
1010 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::check_this(cyg_assert_class_zeal zeal) const
|
1011 |
|
|
{
|
1012 |
|
|
if (CdlConflict_DataBody_Magic != cdlconflict_databody_cookie) {
|
1013 |
|
|
return false;
|
1014 |
|
|
}
|
1015 |
|
|
CYGDBG_MEMLEAK_CHECKTHIS();
|
1016 |
|
|
return CdlConflictBody::check_this(zeal);
|
1017 |
|
|
}
|
1018 |
|
|
|
1019 |
|
|
bool
|
1020 |
|
|
CdlConflict_DataBody::test(CdlConflict conf)
|
1021 |
|
|
{
|
1022 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCNAMETYPE("CdlConflict_Data::test", "result %d");
|
1023 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_FUNCARG1XV(conf);
|
1024 |
|
|
CYG_PRECONDITION_CLASSC(conf);
|
1025 |
|
|
|
1026 |
|
|
bool result = false;
|
1027 |
|
|
CdlConflict_Data tmp = dynamic_cast<CdlConflict_Data>(conf);
|
1028 |
|
|
if (0 != tmp) {
|
1029 |
|
|
result = true;
|
1030 |
|
|
}
|
1031 |
|
|
|
1032 |
|
|
CYG_REPORT_RETVAL(result);
|
1033 |
|
|
return result;
|
1034 |
|
|
}
|
1035 |
|
|
|
1036 |
|
|
//}}}
|