1 |
1625 |
jcastillo |
|
2 |
|
|
[ This is a mail-message in response to a query on IO mapping, thus the
|
3 |
|
|
strange format for a "document" ]
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
The aha1542 is a bus-master device, and your patch makes the driver give the
|
6 |
|
|
controller the physical address of the buffers, which is correct on x86
|
7 |
|
|
(because all bus master devices see the physical memory mappings directly).
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
However, on many setups, there are actually _three_ different ways of looking
|
10 |
|
|
at memory addresses, and in this case we actually want the third, the
|
11 |
|
|
so-called "bus address".
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Essentially, the three ways of addressing memory are (this is "real memory",
|
14 |
|
|
ie normal RAM, see later about other details):
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
- CPU untranslated. This is the "physical" address, ie physical address
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
- CPU translated address. This is the "virtual" address, and is
|
20 |
|
|
completely internal to the CPU itself with the CPU doing the appropriate
|
21 |
|
|
translations into "CPU untranslated".
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
- bus address. This is the address of memory as seen by OTHER devices,
|
24 |
|
|
not the CPU. Now, in theory there could be many different bus
|
25 |
|
|
addresses, with each device seeing memory in some device-specific way, but
|
26 |
|
|
happily most hardware designers aren't actually actively trying to make
|
27 |
|
|
things any more complex than necessary, so you can assume that all
|
28 |
|
|
external hardware sees the memory the same way.
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Now, on normal PC's the bus address is exactly the same as the physical
|
31 |
|
|
address, and things are very simple indeed. However, they are that simple
|
32 |
|
|
because the memory and the devices share the same address space, and that is
|
33 |
|
|
not generally necessarily true on other PCI/ISA setups.
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Now, just as an example, on the PReP (PowerPC Reference Platform), the
|
36 |
|
|
CPU sees a memory map something like this (this is from memory):
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
0-2GB "real memory"
|
39 |
|
|
2GB-3GB "system IO" (ie inb/out type accesses on x86)
|
40 |
|
|
3GB-4GB "IO memory" (ie shared memory over the IO bus)
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Now, that looks simple enough. However, when you look at the same thing from
|
43 |
|
|
the viewpoint of the devices, you have the reverse, and the physical memory
|
44 |
|
|
address 0 actually shows up as address 2GB for any IO master.
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
So when the CPU wants any bus master to write to physical memory 0, it
|
47 |
|
|
has to give the master address 0x80000000 as the memory address.
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
So, for example, depending on how the kernel is actually mapped on the
|
50 |
|
|
PPC, you can end up with a setup like this:
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
physical address: 0
|
53 |
|
|
virtual address: 0xC0000000
|
54 |
|
|
bus address: 0x80000000
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
where all the addresses actually point to the same thing, it's just seen
|
57 |
|
|
through different translations..
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Similarly, on the Alpha, the normal translation is
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
physical address: 0
|
62 |
|
|
virtual address: 0xfffffc0000000000
|
63 |
|
|
bus address: 0x40000000
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
(but there are also Alphas where the physical address and the bus address
|
66 |
|
|
are the same).
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Anyway, the way to look up all these translations, you do
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
#include
|
71 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
phys_addr = virt_to_phys(virt_addr);
|
73 |
|
|
virt_addr = phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
|
74 |
|
|
bus_addr = virt_to_bus(virt_addr);
|
75 |
|
|
virt_addr = bus_to_virt(bus_addr);
|
76 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Now, when do you need these?
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
You want the _virtual_ address when you are actually going to access that
|
80 |
|
|
pointer from the kernel. So you can have something like this:
|
81 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
/*
|
83 |
|
|
* this is the hardware "mailbox" we use to communicate with
|
84 |
|
|
* the controller. The controller sees this directly.
|
85 |
|
|
*/
|
86 |
|
|
struct mailbox {
|
87 |
|
|
__u32 status;
|
88 |
|
|
__u32 bufstart;
|
89 |
|
|
__u32 buflen;
|
90 |
|
|
..
|
91 |
|
|
} mbox;
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
unsigned char * retbuffer;
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
/* get the address from the controller */
|
96 |
|
|
retbuffer = bus_to_virt(mbox.bufstart);
|
97 |
|
|
switch (retbuffer[0]) {
|
98 |
|
|
case STATUS_OK:
|
99 |
|
|
...
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
on the other hand, you want the bus address when you have a buffer that
|
102 |
|
|
you want to give to the controller:
|
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
/* ask the controller to read the sense status into "sense_buffer" */
|
105 |
|
|
mbox.bufstart = virt_to_bus(&sense_buffer);
|
106 |
|
|
mbox.buflen = sizeof(sense_buffer);
|
107 |
|
|
mbox.status = 0;
|
108 |
|
|
notify_controller(&mbox);
|
109 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
And you generally _never_ want to use the physical address, because you can't
|
111 |
|
|
use that from the CPU (the CPU only uses translated virtual addresses), and
|
112 |
|
|
you can't use it from the bus master.
|
113 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
So why do we care about the physical address at all? We do need the physical
|
115 |
|
|
address in some cases, it's just not very often in normal code. The physical
|
116 |
|
|
address is needed if you use memory mappings, for example, because the
|
117 |
|
|
"remap_page_range()" mm function wants the physical address of the memory to
|
118 |
|
|
be remapped (the memory management layer doesn't know about devices outside
|
119 |
|
|
the CPU, so it shouldn't need to know about "bus addresses" etc).
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
NOTE NOTE NOTE! The above is only one part of the whole equation. The above
|
122 |
|
|
only talks about "real memory", ie CPU memory, ie RAM.
|
123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
There is a completely different type of memory too, and that's the "shared
|
125 |
|
|
memory" on the PCI or ISA bus. That's generally not RAM (although in the case
|
126 |
|
|
of a video graphics card it can be normal DRAM that is just used for a frame
|
127 |
|
|
buffer), but can be things like a packet buffer in a network card etc.
|
128 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
This memory is called "PCI memory" or "shared memory" or "IO memory" or
|
130 |
|
|
whatever, and there is only one way to access it: the readb/writeb and
|
131 |
|
|
related functions. You should never take the address of such memory, because
|
132 |
|
|
there is really nothing you can do with such an address: it's not
|
133 |
|
|
conceptually in the same memory space as "real memory" at all, so you cannot
|
134 |
|
|
just dereference a pointer. (Sadly, on x86 it _is_ in the same memory space,
|
135 |
|
|
so on x86 it actually works to just deference a pointer, but it's not
|
136 |
|
|
portable).
|
137 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
For such memory, you can do things like
|
139 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
- reading:
|
141 |
|
|
/*
|
142 |
|
|
* read first 32 bits from ISA memory at 0xC0000, aka
|
143 |
|
|
* C000:0000 in DOS terms
|
144 |
|
|
*/
|
145 |
|
|
unsigned int signature = readl(0xC0000);
|
146 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
- remapping and writing:
|
148 |
|
|
/*
|
149 |
|
|
* remap framebuffer PCI memory area at 0xFC000000,
|
150 |
|
|
* size 1MB, so that we can access it: We can directly
|
151 |
|
|
* access only the 640k-1MB area, so anything else
|
152 |
|
|
* has to be remapped.
|
153 |
|
|
*/
|
154 |
|
|
char * baseptr = ioremap(0xFC000000, 1024*1024);
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
/* write a 'A' to the offset 10 of the area */
|
157 |
|
|
writeb('A',baseptr+10);
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
/* unmap when we unload the driver */
|
160 |
|
|
iounmap(baseptr);
|
161 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
- copying and clearing:
|
163 |
|
|
/* get the 6-byte ethernet address at ISA address E000:0040 */
|
164 |
|
|
memcpy_fromio(kernel_buffer, 0xE0040, 6);
|
165 |
|
|
/* write a packet to the driver */
|
166 |
|
|
memcpy_toio(0xE1000, skb->data, skb->len);
|
167 |
|
|
/* clear the frame buffer */
|
168 |
|
|
memset_io(0xA0000, 0, 0x10000);
|
169 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Ok, that just about covers the basics of accessing IO portably. Questions?
|
171 |
|
|
Comments? You may think that all the above is overly complex, but one day you
|
172 |
|
|
might find yourself with a 500 MHz Alpha in front of you, and then you'll be
|
173 |
|
|
happy that your driver works ;)
|
174 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
Note that kernel versions 2.0.x (and earlier) mistakenly called the
|
176 |
|
|
ioremap() function "vremap()". ioremap() is the proper name, but I
|
177 |
|
|
didn't think straight when I wrote it originally. People who have to
|
178 |
|
|
support both can do something like:
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
/* support old naming sillyness */
|
181 |
|
|
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < 0x020100
|
182 |
|
|
#define ioremap vremap
|
183 |
|
|
#define iounmap vfree
|
184 |
|
|
#endif
|
185 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
at the top of their source files, and then they can use the right names
|
187 |
|
|
even on 2.0.x systems.
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
And the above sounds worse than it really is. Most real drivers really
|
190 |
|
|
don't do all that complex things (or rather: the complexity is not so
|
191 |
|
|
much in the actual IO accesses as in error handling and timeouts etc).
|
192 |
|
|
It's generally not hard to fix drivers, and in many cases the code
|
193 |
|
|
actually looks better afterwards:
|
194 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
unsigned long signature = *(unsigned int *) 0xC0000;
|
196 |
|
|
vs
|
197 |
|
|
unsigned long signature = readl(0xC0000);
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
I think the second version actually is more readable, no?
|
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
Linus
|
202 |
|
|
|