OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/or1k/or1k/trunk

Subversion Repositories or1k

[/] [or1k/] [trunk/] [rtems-20020807/] [doc/] [FAQ/] [endoftime.t] - Blame information for rev 1765

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 1026 ivang
@c
2
@c  COPYRIGHT (c) 1988-2002.
3
@c  On-Line Applications Research Corporation (OAR).
4
@c  All rights reserved.
5
@c
6
@c  endoftime.t,v 1.2 2002/01/17 21:47:44 joel Exp
7
@c
8
 
9
@chapter Date/Time Issues in Systems Using RTEMS
10
 
11
This section provides technical information regarding
12
date/time representation issues and RTEMS.  The Y2K problem has
13
lead numerous people to ask these questions.  The answer to
14
these questions are actually more complicated than most
15
people asking the question expect.  RTEMS supports multiple
16
standards and each of these standards has its own epoch and
17
time representation.  These standards include both programming
18
API and programming language standards.
19
 
20
In addition to the issues inside RTEMS
21
itself, there is the complicating factor that the Board
22
Support Package or application itself may interface with hardware
23
or software that has its own set of date/time representation
24
issues.
25
 
26
In conclusion, viewing date/time representation as "the Y2K problem"
27
is very short-sighted.  Date/time representation should be viewed as
28
a systems level issue for the system you are building.  Each software
29
and hardware component in the system as well as the systems being
30
connected to is a factor in the equation.
31
 
32
@section Hardware Issues
33
 
34
Numerous Real-Time Clock (RTC) controllers provide only a two-digit
35
Binary Coded Decimal (BCD) representation for the current year.  Without
36
software correction, these chips are a classic example of the Y2K problem.
37
When the RTC rolls the year register over from 99 to 00, the device
38
has no idea whether the year is 1900 or 2000.  It is the responsibility
39
of the device driver to recognize this condition and correct for it.
40
The most common technique used is to assume that all years prior
41
to either the existence of the board or RTEMS are past 2000.  The
42
starting year (epoch) for RTEMS is 1988.  Thus,
43
 
44
@itemize @bullet
45
@item Chip year values 88-99 are interpreted as years 1988-2002.
46
@item Chip year values 00-87 are interpreted as years 2000-2087.
47
@end itemize
48
 
49
Using this technique, a RTC using a
50
two-digit BCD representation of the current year will overflow on
51
January 1, 2088.
52
 
53
@section RTEMS Specific Issues
54
 
55
Internally, RTEMS uses an unsigned thirty-two bit integer to represent the
56
number of seconds since midnight January 1, 1988.  This counter will
57
overflow on February 5, 2124.
58
 
59
The time/date services in the Classic API will overflow when the
60
RTEMS internal date/time representation overflows.
61
 
62
The POSIX API uses the type @i{time_t} to represent the number of
63
seconds since January 1, 1970.  Many traditional UNIX systems as
64
well as RTEMS define @i{time_t} as a signed thirty-two bit integer.
65
This representation overflows on January 18, 2038.  The solution
66
usually proposed is to define @i{time_t} as a sixty-four bit
67
integer.  This solution is appropriate for for UNIX workstations
68
as many of them already support sixty-four bit integers natively.
69
At this time, this imposes a burden on embedded systems which are
70
still primarily using processors with native integers of thirty-two
71
bits or less.
72
 
73
@section Language Specific Issues
74
 
75
The Ada95 Language Reference Manual requires that the @i{Ada.Calendar}
76
package support years through the year 2099.  However, just as the
77
hardware is layered on top of hardware and may inherit its limits,
78
the Ada tasking and run-time support is layered on top of an operating
79
system.  Thus, if the operating system or underlying hardware fail
80
to correctly report dates after 2099, then it is possible for the
81
@i{Ada.Calendar} package to fail prior to 2099.
82
 
83
@section Date/Time Conclusion
84
 
85
Each embedded system could be impacted by a variety of date/time
86
representation issues.  Even whether a particular date/time
87
representation issue impacts a system is questionable.  A system
88
using only the RTEMS Classic API is not impacted by the
89
date/time representation issues in POSIX.  A system not using
90
date/time at all is not impacted by any of these issues.  Also
91
the planned end of life for a system may make these issues
92
moot.
93
 
94
The following is a timeline of the date/time representation
95
issues presented in this section:
96
 
97
@itemize @bullet
98
 
99
@item 2000 - Two BCD Digit Real-Time Clock Rollover
100
 
101
@item 2038 - POSIX @i{time_t} Rollover
102
 
103
@item 2088 - Correction for Two BCD Digit Real-Time Clock Rollover
104
 
105
@item 2099 - Ada95 @i{Ada.Calendar} Rollover
106
 
107
@item 2124 - RTEMS Internal Seconds Counter Rollover
108
 
109
@end itemize
110
 
111
 

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.