OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/or1k/or1k/trunk

Subversion Repositories or1k

[/] [or1k/] [trunk/] [rtems-20020807/] [doc/] [TODO] - Blame information for rev 1765

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 1026 ivang
#
2
#  TODO,v 1.7 2002/01/17 21:47:44 joel Exp
3
#
4
 
5
This is a collection of things which need to be done to the various
6
manuals.
7
 
8
General Issues
9
==============
10
May need a Documentation Roadmap - for now, the "Where to
11
go from here" chapter in Getting Started is it.
12
 
13
Need a description of hello world and writing an application.
14
 
15
More automatic handling of version, date, revision, release, etc.
16
 
17
Eliminate use of gifs. [NOTE: ps, pdf, and dvi.gif are from
18
http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/images and the various arrow and
19
bookshelf icons came with texi2www.]
20
 
21
Redraw pictures as appropriate in open source tools.
22
 
23
 
24
Getting Started (C and Ada versions)
25
====================================
26
Switch back to using @url{} when pdf generation error is fixed.
27
 
28
Classic Users Guide
29
===================
30
May need to enhance descriptions in Primitive Data Types Chapter
31
 
32
POSIX User Notes
33
================
34
 
35
Add pages for network services.
36
 
37
Add timer() services if we have any.
38
 
39
 
40
Development Environment Guide
41
=============================
42
Either rename to "A Tour of the RTEMS Source Tree" or include
43
more information on the GNU tools.
44
 
45
The "C Suites" section is oddly named and the directory
46
tree included is wrong in that make is no longer under
47
the c directory.  I think the build-tools make have
48
moved as well.
49
 
50
All the paths should be provided as relative paths
51
from the top of the RTEMS source tree.  It wastes
52
valuable screen space to do otherwise.
53
 
54
The last paragraph of "C Suites" is vague and could
55
be written better.  It should include the subdirectory
56
names as part of the textual description.
57
 
58
Should this documentation even use the phrase "C Implementation"
59
any longer?
60
 
61
Directory names should be in @code -- not "quoted".
62
 
63
In "Support Library Source Directory", look for "which installed"
64
 
65
In the latter part of the "libbsp" paragraph in "Support
66
Library Source Directory", there is reference to the
67
stubdr directory which is no longer there.
68
 
69
Update this section to include discussion of the shared
70
subdirectory and its relationship to the BSPs.  Write this
71
in such a way that it can be passed on to Geoffroy Montel.
72
 
73
In the section, "Test Suite Source Directory", there is a
74
numeric count of the number of tests in each suite.  This
75
should be eliminated for maintenance purposes.
76
 
77
The psxtest directory is not mentioned.  Check that no others
78
have been forgotten.
79
 
80
There should probably be no reference to the Ada sample
81
applications.  This document used to cover both implementations.
82
This now seems inappropriate.
83
 
84
The hello world sample test discussion mentions that it provides
85
a rudiementary test of the BSP startup code and the "RTEMS
86
C Library".  This should be rewritten to tell mroe about what
87
this test shows (actually a lot).  It should mention that this
88
test tries to avoid using interrupts.
89
 
90
The ticker test should mention that in contrast to hello, it
91
does use interrupts. :)  It can be used to tune the clock
92
tick.
93
 
94
The ticker test documentation says it calls "tm_get" -- jeez
95
how old is this manual.

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.