1 |
2 |
jamieiles |
// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
|
2 |
|
|
// All rights reserved.
|
3 |
|
|
//
|
4 |
|
|
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
5 |
|
|
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
|
6 |
|
|
// met:
|
7 |
|
|
//
|
8 |
|
|
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
9 |
|
|
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
10 |
|
|
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
|
11 |
|
|
// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
|
12 |
|
|
// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
|
13 |
|
|
// distribution.
|
14 |
|
|
// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
|
15 |
|
|
// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
|
16 |
|
|
// this software without specific prior written permission.
|
17 |
|
|
//
|
18 |
|
|
// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
19 |
|
|
// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
20 |
|
|
// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
|
21 |
|
|
// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
|
22 |
|
|
// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
|
23 |
|
|
// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
24 |
|
|
// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
|
25 |
|
|
// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
|
26 |
|
|
// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
27 |
|
|
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
|
28 |
|
|
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
29 |
|
|
//
|
30 |
|
|
// The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under
|
31 |
|
|
// various conditions. The output will then be verified by
|
32 |
|
|
// gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the
|
33 |
|
|
// desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO
|
34 |
|
|
// FAIL.
|
35 |
|
|
//
|
36 |
|
|
// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
|
39 |
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
|
42 |
|
|
// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
|
43 |
|
|
// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to
|
44 |
|
|
// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
|
45 |
|
|
// his code.
|
46 |
|
|
#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
|
47 |
|
|
#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
|
48 |
|
|
#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
|
49 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
53 |
|
|
using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
|
54 |
|
|
using testing::TestPartResultArray;
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
using testing::internal::Notification;
|
57 |
|
|
using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
|
58 |
|
|
#endif
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
// Tests catching fatal failures.
|
63 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
// A subroutine used by the following test.
|
65 |
|
|
void TestEq1(int x) {
|
66 |
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
|
67 |
|
|
}
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
|
70 |
|
|
// generates, and then returns early.
|
71 |
|
|
void TryTestSubroutine() {
|
72 |
|
|
// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
73 |
|
|
TestEq1(2);
|
74 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
76 |
|
|
//
|
77 |
|
|
// The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
|
78 |
|
|
// HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
|
79 |
|
|
if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
// If we get here, something is wrong.
|
82 |
|
|
FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
83 |
|
|
}
|
84 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
|
86 |
|
|
}
|
87 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
|
89 |
|
|
}
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
|
92 |
|
|
// failing test summary.
|
93 |
|
|
class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
|
96 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
|
97 |
|
|
}
|
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
|
100 |
|
|
// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
|
101 |
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
|
102 |
|
|
FailingParamTest,
|
103 |
|
|
testing::Values(2));
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2";
|
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) {
|
108 |
|
|
std::string actual = "actual \"string\"";
|
109 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual);
|
110 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
const char* golden = kGoldenString;
|
112 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual);
|
113 |
|
|
}
|
114 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, DiffForLongStrings) {
|
116 |
|
|
std::string golden_str(kGoldenString, sizeof(kGoldenString) - 1);
|
117 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(golden_str, "Line 2");
|
118 |
|
|
}
|
119 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
|
121 |
|
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
122 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
TryTestSubroutine();
|
125 |
|
|
}
|
126 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
|
128 |
|
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
|
129 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
|
132 |
|
|
TryTestSubroutine();
|
133 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
|
135 |
|
|
//
|
136 |
|
|
// When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
|
137 |
|
|
// fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
|
138 |
|
|
if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
|
139 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
// If we get here, something is wrong.
|
141 |
|
|
FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
|
142 |
|
|
}
|
143 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
|
145 |
|
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
|
146 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
|
147 |
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure
|
148 |
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed.
|
149 |
|
|
}
|
150 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
|
152 |
|
|
TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
|
153 |
|
|
static const int a[4] = {
|
154 |
|
|
3, 9, 2, 6
|
155 |
|
|
};
|
156 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
|
158 |
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
|
159 |
|
|
printf("i == %d\n", i);
|
160 |
|
|
EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
|
161 |
|
|
}
|
162 |
|
|
}
|
163 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
|
165 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
167 |
|
|
void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
|
168 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
|
169 |
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
|
170 |
|
|
}
|
171 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
|
173 |
|
|
void SubWithTrace(int n) {
|
174 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
|
175 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
SubWithoutTrace(n);
|
177 |
|
|
}
|
178 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
|
180 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
|
181 |
|
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
// There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
|
184 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
185 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
{
|
187 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
|
188 |
|
|
// After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
|
189 |
|
|
// the trace.
|
190 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
|
191 |
|
|
}
|
192 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
// Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
|
194 |
|
|
// should be no trace again.
|
195 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
|
196 |
|
|
}
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
|
199 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
|
200 |
|
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
201 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
|
203 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
|
204 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
SubWithoutTrace(i);
|
206 |
|
|
}
|
207 |
|
|
}
|
208 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
|
210 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
|
211 |
|
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
212 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
SubWithTrace(1);
|
214 |
|
|
SubWithTrace(2);
|
215 |
|
|
}
|
216 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
|
218 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
|
219 |
|
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
220 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message.
|
222 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
SubWithTrace(2);
|
224 |
|
|
}
|
225 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
|
227 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
|
228 |
|
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n");
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("A");
|
231 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
232 |
|
|
<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("B");
|
235 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
236 |
|
|
<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
|
237 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
{
|
239 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("C");
|
240 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
241 |
|
|
<< "contain trace point A, B, and C.";
|
242 |
|
|
}
|
243 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("D");
|
245 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
246 |
|
|
<< "contain trace point A, B, and D.";
|
247 |
|
|
}
|
248 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
250 |
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
|
251 |
|
|
// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by
|
252 |
|
|
// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
|
253 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
|
255 |
|
|
//
|
256 |
|
|
// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned)
|
257 |
|
|
// ===============================|================================
|
258 |
|
|
// spawns thread B |
|
259 |
|
|
// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
260 |
|
|
// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
261 |
|
|
// | generates failure #1
|
262 |
|
|
// | notifies n1
|
263 |
|
|
// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
264 |
|
|
// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2
|
265 |
|
|
// generates failure #2 |
|
266 |
|
|
// notifies n2 |
|
267 |
|
|
// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
268 |
|
|
// waits for n3 | generates failure #3
|
269 |
|
|
// | trace B dies
|
270 |
|
|
// | generates failure #4
|
271 |
|
|
// | notifies n3
|
272 |
|
|
// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
273 |
|
|
// generates failure #5 | finishes
|
274 |
|
|
// trace A dies |
|
275 |
|
|
// generates failure #6 |
|
276 |
|
|
// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
|
277 |
|
|
// waits for thread B to finish |
|
278 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
struct CheckPoints {
|
280 |
|
|
Notification n1;
|
281 |
|
|
Notification n2;
|
282 |
|
|
Notification n3;
|
283 |
|
|
};
|
284 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
|
286 |
|
|
{
|
287 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
|
288 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
289 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
|
290 |
|
|
check_points->n1.Notify();
|
291 |
|
|
check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
|
292 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
294 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
|
295 |
|
|
} // Trace B dies here.
|
296 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
297 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
|
298 |
|
|
check_points->n3.Notify();
|
299 |
|
|
}
|
300 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
|
302 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
|
303 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
CheckPoints check_points;
|
305 |
|
|
ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
|
306 |
|
|
&check_points,
|
307 |
|
|
NULL);
|
308 |
|
|
check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
|
309 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
{
|
311 |
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
|
312 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
313 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
|
314 |
|
|
check_points.n2.Notify();
|
315 |
|
|
check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
|
316 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
318 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
|
319 |
|
|
} // Trace A dies here.
|
320 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE()
|
321 |
|
|
<< "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
|
322 |
|
|
thread.Join();
|
323 |
|
|
}
|
324 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
325 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
|
327 |
|
|
DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
|
328 |
|
|
// This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for
|
329 |
|
|
// verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
|
330 |
|
|
// suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
|
331 |
|
|
// the test output.
|
332 |
|
|
}
|
333 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
|
335 |
|
|
//
|
336 |
|
|
// This function creates two failures intentionally.
|
337 |
|
|
void AdHocTest() {
|
338 |
|
|
printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
|
339 |
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(false);
|
340 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
|
341 |
|
|
}
|
342 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
|
344 |
|
|
int RunAllTests() {
|
345 |
|
|
AdHocTest();
|
346 |
|
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
347 |
|
|
}
|
348 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
350 |
|
|
class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
351 |
|
|
protected:
|
352 |
|
|
NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
353 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
|
354 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
355 |
|
|
}
|
356 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
358 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
359 |
|
|
}
|
360 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
362 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
|
363 |
|
|
}
|
364 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
366 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
|
367 |
|
|
}
|
368 |
|
|
};
|
369 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
371 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
|
372 |
|
|
}
|
373 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
|
375 |
|
|
class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
|
376 |
|
|
protected:
|
377 |
|
|
FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
378 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
379 |
|
|
Init();
|
380 |
|
|
}
|
381 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
|
383 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
384 |
|
|
}
|
385 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
387 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). "
|
388 |
|
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
389 |
|
|
<< "had a fatal failure.";
|
390 |
|
|
}
|
391 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
393 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). "
|
394 |
|
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
395 |
|
|
<< "had a fatal failure.";
|
396 |
|
|
}
|
397 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
private:
|
399 |
|
|
void Init() {
|
400 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
|
401 |
|
|
}
|
402 |
|
|
};
|
403 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
|
405 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. "
|
406 |
|
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
|
407 |
|
|
<< "had a fatal failure.";
|
408 |
|
|
}
|
409 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
|
411 |
|
|
class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
412 |
|
|
protected:
|
413 |
|
|
virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
414 |
|
|
Deinit();
|
415 |
|
|
}
|
416 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
418 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
|
419 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
420 |
|
|
}
|
421 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
423 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
|
424 |
|
|
}
|
425 |
|
|
private:
|
426 |
|
|
void Deinit() {
|
427 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
428 |
|
|
}
|
429 |
|
|
};
|
430 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
432 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
|
433 |
|
|
}
|
434 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
|
436 |
|
|
class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
|
437 |
|
|
protected:
|
438 |
|
|
virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
|
439 |
|
|
Deinit();
|
440 |
|
|
}
|
441 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
443 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
|
444 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
|
445 |
|
|
}
|
446 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
448 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
|
449 |
|
|
}
|
450 |
|
|
private:
|
451 |
|
|
void Deinit() {
|
452 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
|
453 |
|
|
}
|
454 |
|
|
};
|
455 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
|
457 |
|
|
FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. "
|
458 |
|
|
<< "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
|
459 |
|
|
}
|
460 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
|
462 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
|
463 |
|
|
}
|
464 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
466 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
// A unary function that may die.
|
468 |
|
|
void DieIf(bool should_die) {
|
469 |
|
|
GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
|
470 |
|
|
}
|
471 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
|
473 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
|
475 |
|
|
struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
|
476 |
|
|
SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
|
477 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
Notification spawn_thread_started;
|
479 |
|
|
Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
|
480 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
private:
|
482 |
|
|
GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
|
483 |
|
|
};
|
484 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
|
486 |
|
|
// MultipleThreads test (below).
|
487 |
|
|
static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
|
488 |
|
|
// Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
|
489 |
|
|
notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
|
490 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
// Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
|
492 |
|
|
notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
|
493 |
|
|
}
|
494 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
|
496 |
|
|
// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later
|
497 |
|
|
// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
|
498 |
|
|
class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
|
499 |
|
|
protected:
|
500 |
|
|
// Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
|
501 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
502 |
|
|
thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
|
503 |
|
|
&ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL));
|
504 |
|
|
notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
|
505 |
|
|
}
|
506 |
|
|
// Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
|
507 |
|
|
// Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
|
508 |
|
|
// a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
|
509 |
|
|
// with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class
|
510 |
|
|
// cleans up after itself as best it can.
|
511 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
512 |
|
|
notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
|
513 |
|
|
}
|
514 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
private:
|
516 |
|
|
SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
|
517 |
|
|
testing::internal::scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> >
|
518 |
|
|
thread_;
|
519 |
|
|
};
|
520 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
522 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
|
524 |
|
|
// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
|
525 |
|
|
// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture
|
526 |
|
|
// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
|
527 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
|
529 |
|
|
// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
|
530 |
|
|
// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
|
531 |
|
|
// fail.
|
532 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
namespace foo {
|
534 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
536 |
|
|
};
|
537 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
539 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
|
540 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
542 |
|
|
};
|
543 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
545 |
|
|
TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
546 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
} // namespace foo
|
548 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
namespace bar {
|
550 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
|
552 |
|
|
};
|
553 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the
|
555 |
|
|
// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
|
556 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
|
557 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
|
558 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
|
560 |
|
|
};
|
561 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
563 |
|
|
// generates the right error message.
|
564 |
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
|
565 |
|
|
TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
|
566 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
} // namespace bar
|
568 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
|
570 |
|
|
// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first
|
571 |
|
|
// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
|
572 |
|
|
// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
|
573 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
575 |
|
|
};
|
576 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
|
578 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
580 |
|
|
// generates the right error message.
|
581 |
|
|
TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
|
582 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
|
584 |
|
|
};
|
585 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
|
587 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
|
589 |
|
|
// generates the right error message.
|
590 |
|
|
TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
|
591 |
|
|
}
|
592 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
|
594 |
|
|
int global_integer = 0;
|
595 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
597 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
598 |
|
|
global_integer = 0;
|
599 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
600 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
601 |
|
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
602 |
|
|
}
|
603 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
|
605 |
|
|
// (static or not).
|
606 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
|
607 |
|
|
int m = 0;
|
608 |
|
|
static int n;
|
609 |
|
|
n = 1;
|
610 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
611 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
612 |
|
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
613 |
|
|
}
|
614 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
616 |
|
|
// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
|
617 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
618 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
619 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
620 |
|
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
621 |
|
|
}
|
622 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
|
624 |
|
|
// non-fatal failure.
|
625 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
|
626 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
627 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
628 |
|
|
}, "");
|
629 |
|
|
}
|
630 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
632 |
|
|
// non-fatal failures.
|
633 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
|
634 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
635 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
636 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
|
637 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
|
638 |
|
|
}, "");
|
639 |
|
|
}
|
640 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
|
642 |
|
|
// failure.
|
643 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
644 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
645 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
646 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
647 |
|
|
}, "");
|
648 |
|
|
}
|
649 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
651 |
|
|
// tested returns.
|
652 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
653 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
654 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
655 |
|
|
return;
|
656 |
|
|
}, "");
|
657 |
|
|
}
|
658 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
660 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
662 |
|
|
// tested throws.
|
663 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
664 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
665 |
|
|
try {
|
666 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
667 |
|
|
throw 0;
|
668 |
|
|
}, "");
|
669 |
|
|
} catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
670 |
|
|
}
|
671 |
|
|
}
|
672 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
674 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
|
676 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
|
677 |
|
|
global_integer = 0;
|
678 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
679 |
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
680 |
|
|
}, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
681 |
|
|
}
|
682 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
|
684 |
|
|
// variables.
|
685 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
|
686 |
|
|
static int n;
|
687 |
|
|
n = 1;
|
688 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
689 |
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
690 |
|
|
}, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
691 |
|
|
}
|
692 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
|
694 |
|
|
// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
|
695 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
|
696 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
697 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
698 |
|
|
}, "Expected fatal failure.");
|
699 |
|
|
}
|
700 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
|
702 |
|
|
// failure.
|
703 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
|
704 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
705 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
706 |
|
|
}, "");
|
707 |
|
|
}
|
708 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
|
710 |
|
|
void FatalFailure() {
|
711 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
712 |
|
|
}
|
713 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
|
715 |
|
|
// fatal failures.
|
716 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
|
717 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
718 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
719 |
|
|
FatalFailure();
|
720 |
|
|
FatalFailure();
|
721 |
|
|
}, "");
|
722 |
|
|
}
|
723 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
|
725 |
|
|
// failure.
|
726 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
|
727 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
728 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
729 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
730 |
|
|
}, "");
|
731 |
|
|
}
|
732 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
734 |
|
|
// tested returns.
|
735 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
|
736 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
737 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
738 |
|
|
return;
|
739 |
|
|
}, "");
|
740 |
|
|
}
|
741 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
743 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
|
745 |
|
|
// tested throws.
|
746 |
|
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
|
747 |
|
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
|
748 |
|
|
try {
|
749 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
750 |
|
|
throw 0;
|
751 |
|
|
}, "");
|
752 |
|
|
} catch(int) { // NOLINT
|
753 |
|
|
}
|
754 |
|
|
}
|
755 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
757 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
// This #ifdef block tests the output of value-parameterized tests.
|
759 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST
|
761 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
std::string ParamNameFunc(const testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) {
|
763 |
|
|
return info.param;
|
764 |
|
|
}
|
765 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
class ParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<std::string> {
|
767 |
|
|
};
|
768 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
TEST_P(ParamTest, Success) {
|
770 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ("a", GetParam());
|
771 |
|
|
}
|
772 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
TEST_P(ParamTest, Failure) {
|
774 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ("b", GetParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
775 |
|
|
}
|
776 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingStrings,
|
778 |
|
|
ParamTest,
|
779 |
|
|
testing::Values(std::string("a")),
|
780 |
|
|
ParamNameFunc);
|
781 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST
|
783 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
|
785 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
786 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
template <typename T>
|
788 |
|
|
class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
|
789 |
|
|
};
|
790 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
|
792 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
|
794 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
|
795 |
|
|
}
|
796 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
|
798 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
799 |
|
|
}
|
800 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
802 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
|
804 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
805 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
template <typename T>
|
807 |
|
|
class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
|
808 |
|
|
};
|
809 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
|
811 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
|
813 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
|
814 |
|
|
}
|
815 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
|
817 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
|
818 |
|
|
}
|
819 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
|
821 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
|
823 |
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
|
824 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
826 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
828 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
|
830 |
|
|
// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
831 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
833 |
|
|
}
|
834 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
836 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
|
838 |
|
|
// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
839 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
template <typename T>
|
841 |
|
|
class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
842 |
|
|
};
|
843 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
|
845 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
846 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
848 |
|
|
}
|
849 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
851 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
853 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
|
856 |
|
|
// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
|
857 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
template <typename T>
|
859 |
|
|
class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
|
860 |
|
|
};
|
861 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
|
863 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
|
865 |
|
|
}
|
866 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
|
868 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
|
870 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
872 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
874 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
// Tests various failure conditions of
|
876 |
|
|
// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
877 |
|
|
class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
|
878 |
|
|
public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
|
879 |
|
|
enum FailureMode {
|
880 |
|
|
FATAL_FAILURE,
|
881 |
|
|
NONFATAL_FAILURE
|
882 |
|
|
};
|
883 |
|
|
static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
|
884 |
|
|
if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
|
885 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
886 |
|
|
} else {
|
887 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
888 |
|
|
}
|
889 |
|
|
}
|
890 |
|
|
};
|
891 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
893 |
|
|
// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
894 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
895 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
896 |
|
|
// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
897 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
898 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
|
899 |
|
|
"failure.");
|
900 |
|
|
// Wrong message.
|
901 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
902 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
|
903 |
|
|
"expected.");
|
904 |
|
|
}
|
905 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
907 |
|
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
908 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
909 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
910 |
|
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
911 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
912 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
913 |
|
|
// Wrong message.
|
914 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
915 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
|
916 |
|
|
"failure.");
|
917 |
|
|
}
|
918 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
920 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
|
922 |
|
|
protected:
|
923 |
|
|
static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
|
924 |
|
|
ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
|
925 |
|
|
thread.Join();
|
926 |
|
|
}
|
927 |
|
|
};
|
928 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
|
930 |
|
|
// We only intercept the current thread.
|
931 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
932 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
933 |
|
|
"Expected fatal failure.");
|
934 |
|
|
}
|
935 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
937 |
|
|
// We only intercept the current thread.
|
938 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
939 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
940 |
|
|
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
941 |
|
|
}
|
942 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
|
944 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
|
946 |
|
|
// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
|
947 |
|
|
TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
|
948 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
|
949 |
|
|
TestPartResultArray results;
|
950 |
|
|
{
|
951 |
|
|
ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
|
952 |
|
|
ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
|
953 |
|
|
&results);
|
954 |
|
|
AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
|
955 |
|
|
AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
|
956 |
|
|
}
|
957 |
|
|
// The two failures should not have been intercepted.
|
958 |
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
|
959 |
|
|
}
|
960 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
962 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
964 |
|
|
// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
965 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
966 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
967 |
|
|
// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
|
968 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
969 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
970 |
|
|
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
971 |
|
|
// Wrong message.
|
972 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
973 |
|
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
974 |
|
|
"Some other fatal failure expected.");
|
975 |
|
|
}
|
976 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
978 |
|
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
|
979 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
980 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
|
981 |
|
|
"failure.");
|
982 |
|
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
|
983 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
984 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
985 |
|
|
"Expected fatal failure.");
|
986 |
|
|
// Wrong message.
|
987 |
|
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
|
988 |
|
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
989 |
|
|
"Some other non-fatal failure.");
|
990 |
|
|
}
|
991 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
|
994 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
996 |
|
|
public:
|
997 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
998 |
|
|
printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
999 |
|
|
}
|
1000 |
|
|
|
1001 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
1002 |
|
|
printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
1003 |
|
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
|
1004 |
|
|
}
|
1005 |
|
|
};
|
1006 |
|
|
|
1007 |
|
|
class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
1008 |
|
|
public:
|
1009 |
|
|
virtual void SetUp() {
|
1010 |
|
|
printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
|
1011 |
|
|
}
|
1012 |
|
|
|
1013 |
|
|
virtual void TearDown() {
|
1014 |
|
|
printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
|
1015 |
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
|
1016 |
|
|
}
|
1017 |
|
|
};
|
1018 |
|
|
|
1019 |
|
|
// The main function.
|
1020 |
|
|
//
|
1021 |
|
|
// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
|
1022 |
|
|
// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
|
1023 |
|
|
// with the "golden" file.
|
1024 |
|
|
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
1025 |
|
|
testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
|
1026 |
|
|
|
1027 |
|
|
// We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
|
1028 |
|
|
// We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
|
1029 |
|
|
// this program with the golden file.
|
1030 |
|
|
|
1031 |
|
|
// It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
|
1032 |
|
|
// global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test
|
1033 |
|
|
// for it.
|
1034 |
|
|
testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
1035 |
|
|
bool internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests =
|
1036 |
|
|
std::count(argv, argv + argc,
|
1037 |
|
|
std::string("internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")) > 0;
|
1038 |
|
|
|
1039 |
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
1040 |
|
|
if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
|
1041 |
|
|
// Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
|
1042 |
|
|
// process of an threadsafe-style death test.
|
1043 |
|
|
# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
1044 |
|
|
posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
|
1045 |
|
|
# else
|
1046 |
|
|
posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
|
1047 |
|
|
# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
1048 |
|
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
1049 |
|
|
}
|
1050 |
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
1051 |
|
|
|
1052 |
|
|
if (internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests)
|
1053 |
|
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
1054 |
|
|
|
1055 |
|
|
// Registers two global test environments.
|
1056 |
|
|
// The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
|
1057 |
|
|
// are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
|
1058 |
|
|
testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
|
1059 |
|
|
testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
|
1060 |
|
|
|
1061 |
|
|
return RunAllTests();
|
1062 |
|
|
}
|