OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/scarts/scarts/trunk

Subversion Repositories scarts

[/] [scarts/] [trunk/] [toolchain/] [scarts-gcc/] [gcc-4.1.1/] [gcc/] [README.Portability] - Blame information for rev 12

Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 12 jlechner
Copyright (C) 2000, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
2
 
3
This file is intended to contain a few notes about writing C code
4
within GCC so that it compiles without error on the full range of
5
compilers GCC needs to be able to compile on.
6
 
7
The problem is that many ISO-standard constructs are not accepted by
8
either old or buggy compilers, and we keep getting bitten by them.
9
This knowledge until know has been sparsely spread around, so I
10
thought I'd collect it in one useful place.  Please add and correct
11
any problems as you come across them.
12
 
13
I'm going to start from a base of the ISO C90 standard, since that is
14
probably what most people code to naturally.  Obviously using
15
constructs introduced after that is not a good idea.
16
 
17
For the complete coding style conventions used in GCC, please read
18
http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html
19
 
20
 
21
String literals
22
---------------
23
 
24
Irix6 "cc -n32" and OSF4 "cc" have problems with constant string
25
initializers with parens around it, e.g.
26
 
27
const char string[] = ("A string");
28
 
29
This is unfortunate since this is what the GNU gettext macro N_
30
produces.  You need to find a different way to code it.
31
 
32
Some compilers like MSVC++ have fairly low limits on the maximum
33
length of a string literal; 509 is the lowest we've come across.  You
34
may need to break up a long printf statement into many smaller ones.
35
 
36
 
37
Empty macro arguments
38
---------------------
39
 
40
ISO C (6.8.3 in the 1990 standard) specifies the following:
41
 
42
If (before argument substitution) any argument consists of no
43
preprocessing tokens, the behavior is undefined.
44
 
45
This was relaxed by ISO C99, but some older compilers emit an error,
46
so code like
47
 
48
#define foo(x, y) x y
49
foo (bar, )
50
 
51
needs to be coded in some other way.
52
 
53
 
54
free and realloc
55
----------------
56
 
57
Some implementations crash upon attempts to free or realloc the null
58
pointer.  Thus if mem might be null, you need to write
59
 
60
  if (mem)
61
    free (mem);
62
 
63
 
64
Trigraphs
65
---------
66
 
67
You weren't going to use them anyway, but some otherwise ISO C
68
compliant compilers do not accept trigraphs.
69
 
70
 
71
Suffixes on Integer Constants
72
-----------------------------
73
 
74
You should never use a 'l' suffix on integer constants ('L' is fine),
75
since it can easily be confused with the number '1'.
76
 
77
 
78
                        Common Coding Pitfalls
79
                        ======================
80
 
81
errno
82
-----
83
 
84
errno might be declared as a macro.
85
 
86
 
87
Implicit int
88
------------
89
 
90
In C, the 'int' keyword can often be omitted from type declarations.
91
For instance, you can write
92
 
93
  unsigned variable;
94
 
95
as shorthand for
96
 
97
  unsigned int variable;
98
 
99
There are several places where this can cause trouble.  First, suppose
100
'variable' is a long; then you might think
101
 
102
  (unsigned) variable
103
 
104
would convert it to unsigned long.  It does not.  It converts to
105
unsigned int.  This mostly causes problems on 64-bit platforms, where
106
long and int are not the same size.
107
 
108
Second, if you write a function definition with no return type at
109
all:
110
 
111
  operate (int a, int b)
112
  {
113
    ...
114
  }
115
 
116
that function is expected to return int, *not* void.  GCC will warn
117
about this.
118
 
119
Implicit function declarations always have return type int.  So if you
120
correct the above definition to
121
 
122
  void
123
  operate (int a, int b)
124
  ...
125
 
126
but operate() is called above its definition, you will get an error
127
about a "type mismatch with previous implicit declaration".  The cure
128
is to prototype all functions at the top of the file, or in an
129
appropriate header.
130
 
131
Char vs unsigned char vs int
132
----------------------------
133
 
134
In C, unqualified 'char' may be either signed or unsigned; it is the
135
implementation's choice.  When you are processing 7-bit ASCII, it does
136
not matter.  But when your program must handle arbitrary binary data,
137
or fully 8-bit character sets, you have a problem.  The most obvious
138
issue is if you have a look-up table indexed by characters.
139
 
140
For instance, the character '\341' in ISO Latin 1 is SMALL LETTER A
141
WITH ACUTE ACCENT.  In the proper locale, isalpha('\341') will be
142
true.  But if you read '\341' from a file and store it in a plain
143
char, isalpha(c) may look up character 225, or it may look up
144
character -31.  And the ctype table has no entry at offset -31, so
145
your program will crash.  (If you're lucky.)
146
 
147
It is wise to use unsigned char everywhere you possibly can.  This
148
avoids all these problems.  Unfortunately, the routines in 
149
take plain char arguments, so you have to remember to cast them back
150
and forth - or avoid the use of strxxx() functions, which is probably
151
a good idea anyway.
152
 
153
Another common mistake is to use either char or unsigned char to
154
receive the result of getc() or related stdio functions.  They may
155
return EOF, which is outside the range of values representable by
156
char.  If you use char, some legal character value may be confused
157
with EOF, such as '\377' (SMALL LETTER Y WITH UMLAUT, in Latin-1).
158
The correct choice is int.
159
 
160
A more subtle version of the same mistake might look like this:
161
 
162
  unsigned char pushback[NPUSHBACK];
163
  int pbidx;
164
  #define unget(c) (assert(pbidx < NPUSHBACK), pushback[pbidx++] = (c))
165
  #define get(c) (pbidx ? pushback[--pbidx] : getchar())
166
  ...
167
  unget(EOF);
168
 
169
which will mysteriously turn a pushed-back EOF into a SMALL LETTER Y
170
WITH UMLAUT.
171
 
172
 
173
Other common pitfalls
174
---------------------
175
 
176
o Expecting 'plain' char to be either sign or unsigned extending.
177
 
178
o Shifting an item by a negative amount or by greater than or equal to
179
  the number of bits in a type (expecting shifts by 32 to be sensible
180
  has caused quite a number of bugs at least in the early days).
181
 
182
o Expecting ints shifted right to be sign extended.
183
 
184
o Modifying the same value twice within one sequence point.
185
 
186
o Host vs. target floating point representation, including emitting NaNs
187
  and Infinities in a form that the assembler handles.
188
 
189
o qsort being an unstable sort function (unstable in the sense that
190
  multiple items that sort the same may be sorted in different orders
191
  by different qsort functions).
192
 
193
o Passing incorrect types to fprintf and friends.
194
 
195
o Adding a function declaration for a module declared in another file to
196
  a .c file instead of to a .h file.
197
 

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.