OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/scarts/scarts/trunk

Subversion Repositories scarts

[/] [scarts/] [trunk/] [toolchain/] [scarts-gcc/] [gcc-4.1.1/] [gcc/] [ada/] [par-endh.adb] - Blame information for rev 16

Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | View Log

Line No. Rev Author Line
1 12 jlechner
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
--                                                                          --
3
--                         GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS                         --
4
--                                                                          --
5
--                             P A R . E N D H                              --
6
--                                                                          --
7
--                                 B o d y                                  --
8
--                                                                          --
9
--          Copyright (C) 1992-2005, Free Software Foundation, Inc.         --
10
--                                                                          --
11
-- GNAT is free software;  you can  redistribute it  and/or modify it under --
12
-- terms of the  GNU General Public License as published  by the Free Soft- --
13
-- ware  Foundation;  either version 2,  or (at your option) any later ver- --
14
-- sion.  GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the  implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License --
17
-- for  more details.  You should have  received  a copy of the GNU General --
18
-- Public License  distributed with GNAT;  see file COPYING.  If not, write --
19
-- to  the  Free Software Foundation,  51  Franklin  Street,  Fifth  Floor, --
20
-- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.                                              --
21
--                                                                          --
22
-- GNAT was originally developed  by the GNAT team at  New York University. --
23
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc.      --
24
--                                                                          --
25
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26
 
27
with Stringt; use Stringt;
28
with Uintp;   use Uintp;
29
 
30
with GNAT.Spelling_Checker; use GNAT.Spelling_Checker;
31
 
32
separate (Par)
33
package body Endh is
34
 
35
   ----------------
36
   -- Local Data --
37
   ----------------
38
 
39
   type End_Action_Type is (
40
   --  Type used to describe the result of the Pop_End_Context call
41
 
42
      Accept_As_Scanned,
43
      --  Current end sequence is entirely c correct. In this case Token and
44
      --  the scan pointer are left pointing past the end sequence (i.e. they
45
      --  are unchanged from the values set on entry to Pop_End_Context).
46
 
47
      Insert_And_Accept,
48
      --  Current end sequence is to be left in place to satisfy some outer
49
      --  scope. Token and the scan pointer are set to point to the end
50
      --  token, and should be left there. A message has been generated
51
      --  indicating a missing end sequence. This status is also used for
52
      --  the case when no end token is present.
53
 
54
      Skip_And_Accept,
55
      --  The end sequence is incorrect (and an error message has been
56
      --  posted), but it will still be accepted. In this case Token and
57
      --  the scan pointer point back to the end token, and the caller
58
      --  should skip past the end sequence before proceeding.
59
 
60
      Skip_And_Reject);
61
      --  The end sequence is judged to belong to an unrecognized inner
62
      --  scope. An appropriate message has been issued and the caller
63
      --  should skip past the end sequence and then proceed as though
64
      --  no end sequence had been encountered.
65
 
66
   End_Action : End_Action_Type;
67
   --  The variable set by Pop_End_Context call showing which of the four
68
   --  decisions described above is judged the best.
69
 
70
   End_Sloc : Source_Ptr;
71
   --  Source location of END token
72
 
73
   End_OK : Boolean;
74
   --  Set False if error is found in END line
75
 
76
   End_Column : Column_Number;
77
   --  Column of END line
78
 
79
   End_Type : SS_End_Type;
80
   --  Type of END expected. The special value E_Dummy is set to indicate that
81
   --  no END token was present (so a missing END inserted message is needed)
82
 
83
   End_Labl : Node_Id;
84
   --  Node_Id value for explicit name on END line, or for compiler supplied
85
   --  name in the case where an optional name is not given. Empty if no name
86
   --  appears. If non-empty, then it is either an N_Designator node for a
87
   --  child unit or a node with a Chars field identifying the actual label.
88
 
89
   End_Labl_Present : Boolean;
90
   --  Indicates that the value in End_Labl was for an explicit label
91
 
92
   Syntax_OK : Boolean;
93
   --  Set True if the entry is syntactically correct
94
 
95
   Token_OK : Boolean;
96
   --  Set True if the keyword in the END sequence matches, or if neither
97
   --  the END sequence nor the END stack entry has a keyword.
98
 
99
   Label_OK : Boolean;
100
   --  Set True if both the END sequence and the END stack entry contained
101
   --  labels (other than No_Name or Error_Name) and the labels matched.
102
   --  This is a stronger condition than SYNTAX_OK, since it means that a
103
   --  label was present, even in a case where it was optional. Note that
104
   --  the case of no label required, and no label present does NOT set
105
   --  Label_OK to True, it is True only if a positive label match is found.
106
 
107
   Column_OK : Boolean;
108
   --  Column_OK is set True if the END sequence appears in the expected column
109
 
110
   Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
111
   --  Save state at start of END sequence, in case we decide not to eat it up
112
 
113
   -----------------------
114
   -- Local Subprograms --
115
   -----------------------
116
 
117
   procedure Evaluate_End_Entry (SS_Index : Nat);
118
   --  Compare scanned END entry (as recorded by a prior call to P_End_Scan)
119
   --  with a specified entry in the scope stack (the single parameter is the
120
   --  entry index in the scope stack). Note that Scan is not called. The above
121
   --  variables xxx_OK are set to indicate the result of the evaluation.
122
 
123
   function Explicit_Start_Label (SS_Index : Nat) return Boolean;
124
   --  Determines whether the specified entry in the scope stack has an
125
   --  explicit start label (i.e. one other than one that was created by
126
   --  the parser when no explicit label was present)
127
 
128
   procedure Output_End_Deleted;
129
   --  Output a message complaining that the current END structure does not
130
   --  match anything and is being deleted.
131
 
132
   procedure Output_End_Expected (Ins : Boolean);
133
   --  Output a message at the start of the current token which is always an
134
   --  END, complaining that the END is not of the right form. The message
135
   --  indicates the expected form. The information for the message is taken
136
   --  from the top entry in the scope stack. The Ins parameter is True if
137
   --  an end is being inserted, and false if an existing end is being
138
   --  replaced. Note that in the case of a suspicious IS for the Ins case,
139
   --  we do not output the message, but instead simply mark the scope stack
140
   --  entry as being a case of a bad IS.
141
 
142
   procedure Output_End_Missing;
143
   --  Output a message just before the current token, complaining that the
144
   --  END is not of the right form. The message indicates the expected form.
145
   --  The information for the message is taken from the top entry in the
146
   --  scope stack. Note that in the case of a suspicious IS, we do not output
147
   --  the message, but instead simply mark the scope stack entry as a bad IS.
148
 
149
   procedure Pop_End_Context;
150
   --  Pop_End_Context is called after processing a construct, to pop the
151
   --  top entry off the end stack. It decides on the appropriate action to
152
   --  to take, signalling the result by setting End_Action as described in
153
   --  the global variable section.
154
 
155
   function Same_Label (Label1, Label2 : Node_Id) return Boolean;
156
   --  This function compares the two names associated with the given nodes.
157
   --  If they are both simple (i.e. have Chars fields), then they have to
158
   --  be the same name. Otherwise they must both be N_Selected_Component
159
   --  nodes, referring to the same set of names, or Label1 is an N_Designator
160
   --  referring to the same set of names as the N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name
161
   --  in Label2. Any other combination returns False. This routine is used
162
   --  to compare the End_Labl scanned from the End line with the saved label
163
   --  value in the scope stack.
164
 
165
   ---------------
166
   -- Check_End --
167
   ---------------
168
 
169
   function Check_End return Boolean is
170
      Name_On_Separate_Line : Boolean;
171
      --  Set True if the name on an END line is on a separate source line
172
      --  from the END. This is highly suspicious, but is allowed. The point
173
      --  is that we want to make sure that we don't just have a missing
174
      --  semicolon misleading us into swallowing an identifier from the
175
      --  following line.
176
 
177
      Name_Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
178
      --  Save state at start of name if Name_On_Separate_Line is TRUE
179
 
180
      Span_Node : constant Node_Id := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Node;
181
 
182
   begin
183
      End_Labl_Present := False;
184
      End_Labl := Empty;
185
 
186
      --  Our first task is to scan out the END sequence if one is present.
187
      --  If none is present, signal by setting End_Type to E_Dummy.
188
 
189
      if Token /= Tok_End then
190
         End_Type := E_Dummy;
191
 
192
      else
193
         Save_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- at END
194
         End_Sloc := Token_Ptr;
195
         End_Column := Start_Column;
196
         End_OK := True;
197
         Scan; -- past END
198
 
199
         --  Set End_Span if expected. note that this will be useless
200
         --  if we do not have the right ending keyword, but in this
201
         --  case we have a malformed program anyway, and the setting
202
         --  of End_Span will simply be unreliable in this case anyway.
203
 
204
         if Present (Span_Node) then
205
            Set_End_Location (Span_Node, Token_Ptr);
206
         end if;
207
 
208
         --  Cases of keywords where no label is allowed
209
 
210
         if Token = Tok_Case then
211
            End_Type := E_Case;
212
            Scan; -- past CASE
213
 
214
         elsif Token = Tok_If then
215
            End_Type := E_If;
216
            Scan; -- past IF
217
 
218
         elsif Token = Tok_Record then
219
            End_Type := E_Record;
220
            Scan; -- past RECORD
221
 
222
         elsif Token = Tok_Select then
223
            End_Type := E_Select;
224
            Scan; -- past SELECT
225
 
226
         --  Cases which do allow labels
227
 
228
         else
229
            --  LOOP
230
 
231
            if Token = Tok_Loop then
232
               Scan; -- past LOOP
233
               End_Type := E_Loop;
234
 
235
            --  FOR or WHILE allowed (signalling error) to substitute for LOOP
236
            --  if on the same line as the END
237
 
238
            elsif (Token = Tok_For or else Token = Tok_While)
239
              and then not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
240
            then
241
               Scan; -- past FOR or WHILE
242
               End_Type := E_Loop;
243
               End_OK := False;
244
 
245
            --  Cases with no keyword
246
 
247
            else
248
               End_Type := E_Name;
249
            end if;
250
 
251
            --  Now see if a name is present
252
 
253
            if Token = Tok_Identifier or else
254
               Token = Tok_String_Literal or else
255
               Token = Tok_Operator_Symbol
256
            then
257
               if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
258
                  Name_On_Separate_Line := True;
259
                  Save_Scan_State (Name_Scan_State);
260
               else
261
                  Name_On_Separate_Line := False;
262
               end if;
263
 
264
               End_Labl := P_Designator;
265
               End_Labl_Present := True;
266
 
267
               --  We have now scanned out a name. Here is where we do a check
268
               --  to catch the cases like:
269
               --
270
               --    end loop
271
               --    X := 3;
272
               --
273
               --  where the missing semicolon might make us swallow up the X
274
               --  as a bogus end label. In a situation like this, where the
275
               --  apparent name is on a separate line, we accept it only if
276
               --  it matches the label and is followed by a semicolon.
277
 
278
               if Name_On_Separate_Line then
279
                  if Token /= Tok_Semicolon or else
280
                    not Same_Label (End_Labl, Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl)
281
                  then
282
                     Restore_Scan_State (Name_Scan_State);
283
                     End_Labl := Empty;
284
                     End_Labl_Present := False;
285
                  end if;
286
               end if;
287
 
288
            --  Here for case of name allowed, but no name present. We will
289
            --  supply an implicit matching name, with source location set
290
            --  to the scan location past the END token.
291
 
292
            else
293
               End_Labl := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl;
294
 
295
               if End_Labl > Empty_Or_Error then
296
 
297
                  --  The task here is to construct a designator from the
298
                  --  opening label, with the components all marked as not
299
                  --  from source, and Is_End_Label set in the identifier
300
                  --  or operator symbol. The location for all components
301
                  --  is the curent token location.
302
 
303
                  --  Case of child unit name
304
 
305
                  if Nkind (End_Labl) = N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name then
306
                     Child_End : declare
307
                        Eref : constant Node_Id :=
308
                                 Make_Identifier (Token_Ptr,
309
                                   Chars =>
310
                                     Chars (Defining_Identifier (End_Labl)));
311
 
312
                        function Copy_Name (N : Node_Id) return Node_Id;
313
                        --  Copies a selected component or identifier
314
 
315
                        ---------------
316
                        -- Copy_Name --
317
                        ---------------
318
 
319
                        function Copy_Name (N : Node_Id) return Node_Id is
320
                           R : Node_Id;
321
 
322
                        begin
323
                           if Nkind (N) = N_Selected_Component then
324
                              return
325
                                Make_Selected_Component (Token_Ptr,
326
                                  Prefix        =>
327
                                    Copy_Name (Prefix (N)),
328
                                  Selector_Name =>
329
                                    Copy_Name (Selector_Name (N)));
330
 
331
                           else
332
                              R :=
333
                                Make_Identifier (Token_Ptr,
334
                                  Chars => Chars (N));
335
                              Set_Comes_From_Source (N, False);
336
                              return R;
337
                           end if;
338
                        end Copy_Name;
339
 
340
                     --  Start of processing for Child_End
341
 
342
                     begin
343
                        Set_Comes_From_Source (Eref, False);
344
 
345
                        End_Labl :=
346
                          Make_Designator (Token_Ptr,
347
                            Name       => Copy_Name (Name (End_Labl)),
348
                            Identifier => Eref);
349
                     end Child_End;
350
 
351
                  --  Simple identifier case
352
 
353
                  elsif Nkind (End_Labl) = N_Defining_Identifier
354
                    or else Nkind (End_Labl) = N_Identifier
355
                  then
356
                     End_Labl :=
357
                       Make_Identifier (Token_Ptr,
358
                         Chars => Chars (End_Labl));
359
 
360
                  elsif Nkind (End_Labl) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
361
                    or else Nkind (End_Labl) = N_Operator_Symbol
362
                  then
363
                     Get_Decoded_Name_String (Chars (End_Labl));
364
 
365
                     End_Labl :=
366
                       Make_Operator_Symbol (Token_Ptr,
367
                         Chars  => Chars (End_Labl),
368
                         Strval => String_From_Name_Buffer);
369
                  end if;
370
 
371
                  Set_Comes_From_Source (End_Labl, False);
372
                  End_Labl_Present := False;
373
 
374
                  --  Do style check for missing label
375
 
376
                  if Style_Check
377
                    and then End_Type = E_Name
378
                    and then Explicit_Start_Label (Scope.Last)
379
                  then
380
                     Style.No_End_Name (Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl);
381
                  end if;
382
               end if;
383
            end if;
384
         end if;
385
 
386
         --  Except in case of END RECORD, semicolon must follow. For END
387
         --  RECORD, a semicolon does follow, but it is part of a higher level
388
         --  construct. In any case, a missing semicolon is not serious enough
389
         --  to consider the END statement to be bad in the sense that we
390
         --  are dealing with (i.e. to be suspicious that it is not in fact
391
         --  the END statement we are looking for!)
392
 
393
         if End_Type /= E_Record then
394
            if Token = Tok_Semicolon then
395
               T_Semicolon;
396
 
397
            --  Semicolon is missing. If the missing semicolon is at the end
398
            --  of the line, i.e. we are at the start of the line now, then
399
            --  a missing semicolon gets flagged, but is not serious enough
400
            --  to consider the END statement to be bad in the sense that we
401
            --  are dealing with (i.e. to be suspicious that this END is not
402
            --  the END statement we are looking for).
403
 
404
            --  Similarly, if we are at a colon, we flag it but a colon for
405
            --  a semicolon is not serious enough to consider the END to be
406
            --  incorrect. Same thing for a period in place of a semicolon.
407
 
408
            elsif Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
409
              or else Token = Tok_Colon
410
              or else Token = Tok_Dot
411
            then
412
               T_Semicolon;
413
 
414
            --  If the missing semicolon is not at the start of the line,
415
            --  then we do consider the END line to be dubious in this sense.
416
 
417
            else
418
               End_OK := False;
419
            end if;
420
         end if;
421
      end if;
422
 
423
      --  Now we call the Pop_End_Context routine to get a recommendation
424
      --  as to what should be done with the END sequence we have scanned.
425
 
426
      Pop_End_Context;
427
 
428
      --  Remaining action depends on End_Action set by Pop_End_Context
429
 
430
      case End_Action is
431
 
432
         --  Accept_As_Scanned. In this case, Pop_End_Context left Token
433
         --  pointing past the last token of a syntactically correct END
434
 
435
         when Accept_As_Scanned =>
436
 
437
            --  Syntactically correct included the possibility of a missing
438
            --  semicolon. If we do have a missing semicolon, then we have
439
            --  already given a message, but now we scan out possible rubbish
440
            --  on the same line as the END
441
 
442
            while not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
443
              and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Record
444
              and then Prev_Token /= Tok_Semicolon
445
              and then Token /= Tok_End
446
              and then Token /= Tok_EOF
447
            loop
448
               Scan; -- past junk
449
            end loop;
450
 
451
            return True;
452
 
453
         --  Insert_And_Accept. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
454
         --  to point to the start of the END sequence, and recommends that it
455
         --  be left in place to satisfy an outer scope level END. This means
456
         --  that we proceed as though an END were present, and leave the scan
457
         --  pointer unchanged.
458
 
459
         when Insert_And_Accept =>
460
            return True;
461
 
462
         --  Skip_And_Accept. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
463
         --  to point to the start of the END sequence. This END sequence is
464
         --  syntactically incorrect, and an appropriate error message has
465
         --  already been posted. Pop_End_Context recommends accepting the
466
         --  END sequence as the one we want, so we skip past it and then
467
         --  proceed as though an END were present.
468
 
469
         when Skip_And_Accept =>
470
            End_Skip;
471
            return True;
472
 
473
         --  Skip_And_Reject. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
474
         --  to point to the start of the END sequence. This END sequence is
475
         --  syntactically incorrect, and an appropriate error message has
476
         --  already been posted. Pop_End_Context recommends entirely ignoring
477
         --  this END sequence, so we skip past it and then return False, since
478
         --  as far as the caller is concerned, no END sequence is present.
479
 
480
         when Skip_And_Reject =>
481
            End_Skip;
482
            return False;
483
      end case;
484
   end Check_End;
485
 
486
   --------------
487
   -- End Skip --
488
   --------------
489
 
490
   --  This procedure skips past an END sequence. On entry Token contains
491
   --  Tok_End, and we know that the END sequence is syntactically incorrect,
492
   --  and that an appropriate error message has already been posted. The
493
   --  mission is simply to position the scan pointer to be the best guess of
494
   --  the position after the END sequence. We do not issue any additional
495
   --  error messages while carrying this out.
496
 
497
   --  Error recovery: does not raise Error_Resync
498
 
499
   procedure End_Skip is
500
   begin
501
      Scan; -- past END
502
 
503
      --  If the scan past the END leaves us on the next line, that's probably
504
      --  where we should quit the scan, since it is likely that what we have
505
      --  is a missing semicolon. Consider the following:
506
 
507
      --       END
508
      --       Process_Input;
509
 
510
      --  This will have looked like a syntactically valid END sequence to the
511
      --  initial scan of the END, but subsequent checking will have determined
512
      --  that the label Process_Input is not an appropriate label. The real
513
      --  error is a missing semicolon after the END, and by leaving the scan
514
      --  pointer just past the END, we will improve the error recovery.
515
 
516
      if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
517
         return;
518
      end if;
519
 
520
      --  If there is a semicolon after the END, scan it out and we are done
521
 
522
      if Token = Tok_Semicolon then
523
         T_Semicolon;
524
         return;
525
      end if;
526
 
527
      --  Otherwise skip past a token after the END on the same line. Note
528
      --  that we do not eat a token on the following line since it seems
529
      --  very unlikely in any case that the END gets separated from its
530
      --  token, and we do not want to swallow up a keyword that starts a
531
      --  legitimate construct following the bad END.
532
 
533
      if not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
534
        and then
535
 
536
         --  Cases of normal tokens following an END
537
 
538
          (Token = Tok_Case   or else
539
           Token = Tok_For    or else
540
           Token = Tok_If     or else
541
           Token = Tok_Loop   or else
542
           Token = Tok_Record or else
543
           Token = Tok_Select or else
544
 
545
         --  Cases of bogus keywords ending loops
546
 
547
           Token = Tok_For    or else
548
           Token = Tok_While  or else
549
 
550
         --  Cases of operator symbol names without quotes
551
 
552
           Token = Tok_Abs    or else
553
           Token = Tok_And    or else
554
           Token = Tok_Mod    or else
555
           Token = Tok_Not    or else
556
           Token = Tok_Or     or else
557
           Token = Tok_Xor)
558
 
559
      then
560
         Scan; -- past token after END
561
 
562
         --  If that leaves us on the next line, then we are done. This is the
563
         --  same principle described above for the case of END at line end
564
 
565
         if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
566
            return;
567
 
568
         --  If we just scanned out record, then we are done, since the
569
         --  semicolon after END RECORD is not part of the END sequence
570
 
571
         elsif Prev_Token = Tok_Record then
572
            return;
573
 
574
         --  If we have a semicolon, scan it out and we are done
575
 
576
         elsif Token = Tok_Semicolon then
577
            T_Semicolon;
578
            return;
579
         end if;
580
      end if;
581
 
582
      --  Check for a label present on the same line
583
 
584
      loop
585
         if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
586
            return;
587
         end if;
588
 
589
         if Token /= Tok_Identifier
590
           and then Token /= Tok_Operator_Symbol
591
           and then Token /= Tok_String_Literal
592
         then
593
            exit;
594
         end if;
595
 
596
         Scan; -- past identifier, operator symbol or string literal
597
 
598
         if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line then
599
            return;
600
         elsif Token = Tok_Dot then
601
            Scan; -- past dot
602
         end if;
603
      end loop;
604
 
605
      --  Skip final semicolon
606
 
607
      if Token = Tok_Semicolon then
608
         T_Semicolon;
609
 
610
      --  If we don't have a final semicolon, skip until we either encounter
611
      --  an END token, or a semicolon or the start of the next line. This
612
      --  allows general junk to follow the end line (normally it is hard to
613
      --  think that anyone will put anything deliberate here, and remember
614
      --  that we know there is a missing semicolon in any case). We also
615
      --  quite on an EOF (or else we would get stuck in an infinite loop
616
      --  if there is no line end at the end of the last line of the file)
617
 
618
      else
619
         while Token /= Tok_End
620
           and then Token /= Tok_EOF
621
           and then Token /= Tok_Semicolon
622
           and then not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
623
         loop
624
            Scan; -- past junk token on same line
625
         end loop;
626
      end if;
627
 
628
      return;
629
   end End_Skip;
630
 
631
   --------------------
632
   -- End Statements --
633
   --------------------
634
 
635
   --  This procedure is called when END is required or expected to terminate
636
   --  a sequence of statements. The caller has already made an appropriate
637
   --  entry on the scope stack to describe the expected form of the END.
638
   --  End_Statements should only be used in cases where the only appropriate
639
   --  terminator is END.
640
 
641
   --  Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync;
642
 
643
   procedure End_Statements (Parent : Node_Id := Empty) is
644
   begin
645
      --  This loop runs more than once in the case where Check_End rejects
646
      --  the END sequence, as indicated by Check_End returning False.
647
 
648
      loop
649
         if Check_End then
650
            if Present (Parent) then
651
               Set_End_Label (Parent, End_Labl);
652
            end if;
653
 
654
            return;
655
         end if;
656
 
657
         --  Extra statements past the bogus END are discarded. This is not
658
         --  ideal for maximum error recovery, but it's too much trouble to
659
         --  find an appropriate place to put them!
660
 
661
         Discard_Junk_List (P_Sequence_Of_Statements (SS_None));
662
      end loop;
663
   end End_Statements;
664
 
665
   ------------------------
666
   -- Evaluate End Entry --
667
   ------------------------
668
 
669
   procedure Evaluate_End_Entry (SS_Index : Nat) is
670
   begin
671
      Column_OK := (End_Column = Scope.Table (SS_Index).Ecol);
672
 
673
      Token_OK  := (End_Type = Scope.Table (SS_Index).Etyp or else
674
                     (End_Type = E_Name and then
675
                       Scope.Table (SS_Index).Etyp >= E_Name));
676
 
677
      Label_OK := End_Labl_Present
678
                    and then
679
                      (Same_Label (End_Labl, Scope.Table (SS_Index).Labl)
680
                        or else Scope.Table (SS_Index).Labl = Error);
681
 
682
      --  Compute setting of Syntax_OK. We definitely have a syntax error
683
      --  if the Token does not match properly or if P_End_Scan detected
684
      --  a syntax error such as a missing semicolon.
685
 
686
      if not Token_OK or not End_OK then
687
         Syntax_OK := False;
688
 
689
      --  Final check is that label is OK. Certainly it is OK if there
690
      --  was an exact match on the label (the END label = the stack label)
691
 
692
      elsif Label_OK then
693
         Syntax_OK := True;
694
 
695
      --  Case of label present
696
 
697
      elsif End_Labl_Present then
698
 
699
         --  If probably misspelling, then complain, and pretend it is OK
700
 
701
         declare
702
            Nam : constant Node_Or_Entity_Id := Scope.Table (SS_Index).Labl;
703
 
704
         begin
705
            if Nkind (End_Labl) in N_Has_Chars
706
              and then Comes_From_Source (Nam)
707
              and then Nkind (Nam) in N_Has_Chars
708
              and then Chars (End_Labl) > Error_Name
709
              and then Chars (Nam) > Error_Name
710
            then
711
               Get_Name_String (Chars (End_Labl));
712
               Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (Nam);
713
 
714
               if Error_Msg_Name_1 > Error_Name then
715
                  declare
716
                     S : constant String (1 .. Name_Len) :=
717
                           Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len);
718
 
719
                  begin
720
                     Get_Name_String (Error_Msg_Name_1);
721
 
722
                     if Is_Bad_Spelling_Of
723
                         (Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len), S)
724
                     then
725
                        Error_Msg_N ("misspelling of %", End_Labl);
726
                        Syntax_OK := True;
727
                        return;
728
                     end if;
729
                  end;
730
               end if;
731
            end if;
732
         end;
733
 
734
         Syntax_OK := False;
735
 
736
      --  Otherwise we have cases of no label on the END line. For the loop
737
      --  case, this is acceptable only if the loop is unlabeled.
738
 
739
      elsif End_Type = E_Loop then
740
         Syntax_OK := not Explicit_Start_Label (SS_Index);
741
 
742
      --  Cases where a label is definitely allowed on the END line
743
 
744
      elsif End_Type = E_Name then
745
         Syntax_OK := (not Explicit_Start_Label (SS_Index))
746
                         or else
747
                      (not Scope.Table (SS_Index).Lreq);
748
 
749
      --  Otherwise we have cases which don't allow labels anyway, so we
750
      --  certainly accept an END which does not have a label.
751
 
752
      else
753
         Syntax_OK := True;
754
      end if;
755
   end Evaluate_End_Entry;
756
 
757
   --------------------------
758
   -- Explicit_Start_Label --
759
   --------------------------
760
 
761
   function Explicit_Start_Label (SS_Index : Nat) return Boolean is
762
      L : constant Node_Id := Scope.Table (SS_Index).Labl;
763
 
764
   begin
765
      if No (L) then
766
         return False;
767
      elsif Comes_From_Source (L) then
768
         return True;
769
      else
770
         return False;
771
      end if;
772
   end Explicit_Start_Label;
773
 
774
   ------------------------
775
   -- Output End Deleted --
776
   ------------------------
777
 
778
   procedure Output_End_Deleted is
779
   begin
780
 
781
      if End_Type = E_Loop then
782
         Error_Msg_SC ("no LOOP for this `END LOOP`!");
783
 
784
      elsif End_Type = E_Case then
785
         Error_Msg_SC ("no CASE for this `END CASE`");
786
 
787
      elsif End_Type = E_If then
788
         Error_Msg_SC ("no IF for this `END IF`!");
789
 
790
      elsif End_Type = E_Record then
791
         Error_Msg_SC ("no RECORD for this `END RECORD`!");
792
 
793
      elsif End_Type = E_Select then
794
         Error_Msg_SC ("no SELECT for this `END SELECT`!");
795
 
796
      else
797
         Error_Msg_SC ("no BEGIN for this END!");
798
      end if;
799
   end Output_End_Deleted;
800
 
801
   -------------------------
802
   -- Output End Expected --
803
   -------------------------
804
 
805
   procedure Output_End_Expected (Ins : Boolean) is
806
      End_Type : SS_End_Type;
807
 
808
   begin
809
      --  Suppress message if this was a potentially junk entry (e.g. a
810
      --  record entry where no record keyword was present.
811
 
812
      if Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Junk then
813
         return;
814
      end if;
815
 
816
      End_Type := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp;
817
      Error_Msg_Col    := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol;
818
      Error_Msg_Sloc   := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc;
819
 
820
      if Explicit_Start_Label (Scope.Last) then
821
         Error_Msg_Node_1 := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl;
822
      else
823
         Error_Msg_Node_1 := Empty;
824
      end if;
825
 
826
      --  Suppress message if error was posted on opening label
827
 
828
      if Error_Msg_Node_1 > Empty_Or_Error
829
        and then Error_Posted (Error_Msg_Node_1)
830
      then
831
         return;
832
      end if;
833
 
834
      if End_Type = E_Case then
835
         Error_Msg_SC ("`END CASE;` expected@ for CASE#!");
836
 
837
      elsif End_Type = E_If then
838
         Error_Msg_SC ("`END IF;` expected@ for IF#!");
839
 
840
      elsif End_Type = E_Loop then
841
         if Error_Msg_Node_1 = Empty then
842
            Error_Msg_SC
843
              ("`END LOOP;` expected@ for LOOP#!");
844
         else
845
            Error_Msg_SC ("`END LOOP &;` expected@!");
846
         end if;
847
 
848
      elsif End_Type = E_Record then
849
         Error_Msg_SC
850
           ("`END RECORD;` expected@ for RECORD#!");
851
 
852
      elsif End_Type = E_Select then
853
         Error_Msg_SC
854
           ("`END SELECT;` expected@ for SELECT#!");
855
 
856
      --  All remaining cases are cases with a name (we do not treat
857
      --  the suspicious is cases specially for a replaced end, only
858
      --  for an inserted end).
859
 
860
      elsif End_Type = E_Name or else (not Ins) then
861
         if Error_Msg_Node_1 = Empty then
862
            Error_Msg_SC ("`END;` expected@ for BEGIN#!");
863
         else
864
            Error_Msg_SC ("`END &;` expected@!");
865
         end if;
866
 
867
      --  The other possibility is a missing END for a subprogram with a
868
      --  suspicious IS (that probably should have been a semicolon). The
869
      --  Missing IS confirms the suspicion!
870
 
871
      else -- End_Type = E_Suspicious_Is or E_Bad_Is
872
         Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Bad_Is;
873
      end if;
874
   end Output_End_Expected;
875
 
876
   ------------------------
877
   -- Output End Missing --
878
   ------------------------
879
 
880
   procedure Output_End_Missing is
881
      End_Type : SS_End_Type;
882
 
883
   begin
884
      --  Suppress message if this was a potentially junk entry (e.g. a
885
      --  record entry where no record keyword was present.
886
 
887
      if Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Junk then
888
         return;
889
      end if;
890
 
891
      End_Type := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp;
892
      Error_Msg_Sloc   := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc;
893
 
894
      if Explicit_Start_Label (Scope.Last) then
895
         Error_Msg_Node_1 := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Labl;
896
      else
897
         Error_Msg_Node_1 := Empty;
898
      end if;
899
 
900
      if End_Type = E_Case then
901
         Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END CASE;` for CASE#!");
902
 
903
      elsif End_Type = E_If then
904
         Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END IF;` for IF#!");
905
 
906
      elsif End_Type = E_Loop then
907
         if Error_Msg_Node_1 = Empty then
908
            Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END LOOP;` for LOOP#!");
909
         else
910
            Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END LOOP &;`!");
911
         end if;
912
 
913
      elsif End_Type = E_Record then
914
         Error_Msg_SC
915
           ("missing `END RECORD;` for RECORD#!");
916
 
917
      elsif End_Type = E_Select then
918
         Error_Msg_BC
919
           ("missing `END SELECT;` for SELECT#!");
920
 
921
      elsif End_Type = E_Name then
922
         if Error_Msg_Node_1 = Empty then
923
            Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END;` for BEGIN#!");
924
         else
925
            Error_Msg_BC ("missing `END &;`!");
926
         end if;
927
 
928
      else -- End_Type = E_Suspicious_Is or E_Bad_Is
929
         Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp := E_Bad_Is;
930
      end if;
931
   end Output_End_Missing;
932
 
933
   ---------------------
934
   -- Pop End Context --
935
   ---------------------
936
 
937
   procedure Pop_End_Context is
938
 
939
      Pretty_Good : Boolean;
940
      --  This flag is set True if the END sequence is syntactically incorrect,
941
      --  but is (from a heuristic point of view), pretty likely to be simply
942
      --  a misspelling of the intended END.
943
 
944
      Outer_Match : Boolean;
945
      --  This flag is set True if we decide that the current END sequence
946
      --  belongs to some outer level entry in the scope stack, and thus
947
      --  we will NOT eat it up in matching the current expected END.
948
 
949
   begin
950
      --  If not at END, then output END expected message
951
 
952
      if End_Type = E_Dummy then
953
         Output_End_Missing;
954
         Pop_Scope_Stack;
955
         End_Action := Insert_And_Accept;
956
         return;
957
 
958
      --  Otherwise we do have an END present
959
 
960
      else
961
         --  A special check. If we have END; followed by an end of file,
962
         --  WITH or SEPARATE, then if we are not at the outer level, then
963
         --  we have a sytax error. Consider the example:
964
 
965
         --   ...
966
         --      declare
967
         --         X : Integer;
968
         --      begin
969
         --         X := Father (A);
970
         --         Process (X, X);
971
         --   end;
972
         --   with Package1;
973
         --   ...
974
 
975
         --  Now the END; here is a syntactically correct closer for the
976
         --  declare block, but if we eat it up, then we obviously have
977
         --  a missing END for the outer context (since WITH can only appear
978
         --  at the outer level.
979
 
980
         --  In this situation, we always reserve the END; for the outer level,
981
         --  even if it is in the wrong column. This is because it's much more
982
         --  useful to have the error message point to the DECLARE than to the
983
         --  package header in this case.
984
 
985
         --  We also reserve an end with a name before the end of file if the
986
         --  name is the one we expect at the outer level.
987
 
988
         if (Token = Tok_EOF or else
989
             Token = Tok_With or else
990
             Token = Tok_Separate)
991
           and then End_Type >= E_Name
992
           and then (not End_Labl_Present
993
                      or else Same_Label (End_Labl, Scope.Table (1).Labl))
994
           and then Scope.Last > 1
995
         then
996
            Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- to END
997
            Output_End_Expected (Ins => True);
998
            Pop_Scope_Stack;
999
            End_Action := Insert_And_Accept;
1000
            return;
1001
         end if;
1002
 
1003
         --  Otherwise we go through the normal END evaluation procedure
1004
 
1005
         Evaluate_End_Entry (Scope.Last);
1006
 
1007
         --  If top entry in stack is syntactically correct, then we have
1008
         --  scanned it out and everything is fine. This is the required
1009
         --  action to properly process correct Ada programs.
1010
 
1011
         if Syntax_OK then
1012
 
1013
            --  Complain if checking columns and END is not in right column.
1014
            --  Right in this context means exactly right, or on the same
1015
            --  line as the opener.
1016
 
1017
            if Style.RM_Column_Check then
1018
               if End_Column /= Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
1019
                 and then Current_Line_Start > Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Sloc
1020
               then
1021
                  Error_Msg_Col := Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol;
1022
                  Error_Msg
1023
                    ("(style) END in wrong column, should be@", End_Sloc);
1024
               end if;
1025
            end if;
1026
 
1027
            --  One final check. If the end had a label, check for an exact
1028
            --  duplicate of this end sequence, and if so, skip it with an
1029
            --  appropriate message.
1030
 
1031
            if End_Labl_Present and then Token = Tok_End then
1032
               declare
1033
                  Scan_State : Saved_Scan_State;
1034
                  End_Loc    : constant Source_Ptr := Token_Ptr;
1035
                  Nxt_Labl   : Node_Id;
1036
                  Dup_Found  : Boolean := False;
1037
 
1038
               begin
1039
                  Save_Scan_State (Scan_State);
1040
 
1041
                  Scan; -- past END
1042
 
1043
                  if Token = Tok_Identifier
1044
                    or else Token = Tok_Operator_Symbol
1045
                  then
1046
                     Nxt_Labl := P_Designator;
1047
 
1048
                     --  We only consider it an error if the label is a match
1049
                     --  and would be wrong for the level one above us, and
1050
                     --  the indentation is the same.
1051
 
1052
                     if Token = Tok_Semicolon
1053
                       and then Same_Label (End_Labl, Nxt_Labl)
1054
                       and then End_Column = Start_Column
1055
                       and then
1056
                         (Scope.Last = 1
1057
                            or else
1058
                              (not Explicit_Start_Label (Scope.Last - 1))
1059
                                 or else
1060
                              (not Same_Label
1061
                                     (End_Labl,
1062
                                      Scope.Table (Scope.Last - 1).Labl)))
1063
                     then
1064
                        T_Semicolon;
1065
                        Error_Msg ("duplicate end line ignored", End_Loc);
1066
                        Dup_Found := True;
1067
                     end if;
1068
                  end if;
1069
 
1070
                  if not Dup_Found then
1071
                     Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State);
1072
                  end if;
1073
               end;
1074
            end if;
1075
 
1076
            --  All OK, so return to caller indicating END is OK
1077
 
1078
            Pop_Scope_Stack;
1079
            End_Action := Accept_As_Scanned;
1080
            return;
1081
         end if;
1082
 
1083
         --  If that check failed, then we definitely have an error. The issue
1084
         --  is how to choose among three possible courses of action:
1085
 
1086
         --   1. Ignore the current END text completely, scanning past it,
1087
         --      deciding that it belongs neither to the current context,
1088
         --      nor to any outer context.
1089
 
1090
         --   2. Accept the current END text, scanning past it, and issuing
1091
         --      an error message that it does not have the right form.
1092
 
1093
         --   3. Leave the current END text in place, NOT scanning past it,
1094
         --      issuing an error message indicating the END expected for the
1095
         --      current context. In this case, the END is available to match
1096
         --      some outer END context.
1097
 
1098
         --  From a correct functioning point of view, it does not make any
1099
         --  difference which of these three approaches we take, the program
1100
         --  will work correctly in any case. However, making an accurate
1101
         --  choice among these alternatives, i.e. choosing the one that
1102
         --  corresponds to what the programmer had in mind, does make a
1103
         --  significant difference in the quality of error recovery.
1104
 
1105
         Restore_Scan_State (Scan_State); -- to END
1106
 
1107
         --  First we see how good the current END entry is with respect to
1108
         --  what we expect. It is considered pretty good if the token is OK,
1109
         --  and either the label or the column matches. an END for RECORD is
1110
         --  always considered to be pretty good in the record case. This is
1111
         --  because not only does a record disallow a nested structure, but
1112
         --  also it is unlikely that such nesting could occur by accident.
1113
 
1114
         Pretty_Good := (Token_OK and (Column_OK or Label_OK))
1115
                          or else Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp = E_Record;
1116
 
1117
         --  Next check, if there is a deeper entry in the stack which
1118
         --  has a very high probability of being acceptable, then insert
1119
         --  the END entry we want, leaving the higher level entry for later
1120
 
1121
         for J in reverse 1 .. Scope.Last - 1 loop
1122
            Evaluate_End_Entry (J);
1123
 
1124
            --  To even consider the deeper entry to be immediately acceptable,
1125
            --  it must be syntactically correct. Furthermore it must either
1126
            --  have a correct label, or the correct column. If the current
1127
            --  entry was a close match (Pretty_Good set), then we are even
1128
            --  more strict in accepting the outer level one: even if it has
1129
            --  the right label, it must have the right column as well.
1130
 
1131
            if Syntax_OK then
1132
               if Pretty_Good then
1133
                  Outer_Match := Label_OK and Column_OK;
1134
               else
1135
                  Outer_Match := Label_OK or Column_OK;
1136
               end if;
1137
            else
1138
               Outer_Match := False;
1139
            end if;
1140
 
1141
            --  If the outer entry does convincingly match the END text, then
1142
            --  back up the scan to the start of the END sequence, issue an
1143
            --  error message indicating the END we expected, and return with
1144
            --  Token pointing to the END (case 3 from above discussion).
1145
 
1146
            if Outer_Match then
1147
               Output_End_Missing;
1148
               Pop_Scope_Stack;
1149
               End_Action := Insert_And_Accept;
1150
               return;
1151
            end if;
1152
         end loop;
1153
 
1154
         --  Here we have a situation in which the current END entry is
1155
         --  syntactically incorrect, but there is no deeper entry in the
1156
         --  END stack which convincingly matches it.
1157
 
1158
         --  If the END text was judged to be a Pretty_Good match for the
1159
         --  expected token or if it appears left of the expected column,
1160
         --  then we will accept it as the one we want, scanning past it, even
1161
         --  though it is not completely right (we issue a message showing what
1162
         --  we expected it to be). This is action 2 from the discussion above.
1163
         --  There is one other special case to consider: the LOOP case.
1164
         --  Consider the example:
1165
 
1166
         --     Lbl: loop
1167
         --             null;
1168
         --          end loop;
1169
 
1170
         --  Here the column lines up with Lbl, so END LOOP is to the right,
1171
         --  but it is still acceptable. LOOP is the one case where alignment
1172
         --  practices vary substantially in practice.
1173
 
1174
         if Pretty_Good
1175
            or else End_Column <= Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Ecol
1176
            or else (End_Type = Scope.Table (Scope.Last).Etyp
1177
                        and then End_Type = E_Loop)
1178
         then
1179
            Output_End_Expected (Ins => False);
1180
            Pop_Scope_Stack;
1181
            End_Action := Skip_And_Accept;
1182
            return;
1183
 
1184
         --  Here we have the case where the END is to the right of the
1185
         --  expected column and does not have a correct label to convince
1186
         --  us that it nevertheless belongs to the current scope. For this
1187
         --  we consider that it probably belongs not to the current context,
1188
         --  but to some inner context that was not properly recognized (due to
1189
         --  other syntax errors), and for which no proper scope stack entry
1190
         --  was made. The proper action in this case is to delete the END text
1191
         --  and return False to the caller as a signal to keep on looking for
1192
         --  an acceptable END. This is action 1 from the discussion above.
1193
 
1194
         else
1195
            Output_End_Deleted;
1196
            End_Action := Skip_And_Reject;
1197
            return;
1198
         end if;
1199
      end if;
1200
   end Pop_End_Context;
1201
 
1202
   ----------------
1203
   -- Same_Label --
1204
   ----------------
1205
 
1206
   function Same_Label (Label1, Label2 : Node_Id) return Boolean is
1207
   begin
1208
      if Nkind (Label1) in N_Has_Chars
1209
        and then Nkind (Label2) in N_Has_Chars
1210
      then
1211
         return Chars (Label1) = Chars (Label2);
1212
 
1213
      elsif Nkind (Label1) = N_Selected_Component
1214
        and then Nkind (Label2) = N_Selected_Component
1215
      then
1216
         return Same_Label (Prefix (Label1), Prefix (Label2)) and then
1217
           Same_Label (Selector_Name (Label1), Selector_Name (Label2));
1218
 
1219
      elsif Nkind (Label1) = N_Designator
1220
        and then Nkind (Label2) = N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name
1221
      then
1222
         return Same_Label (Name (Label1), Name (Label2)) and then
1223
           Same_Label (Identifier (Label1), Defining_Identifier (Label2));
1224
 
1225
      else
1226
         return False;
1227
      end if;
1228
   end Same_Label;
1229
 
1230
end Endh;

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.