1 |
62 |
marcus.erl |
Linux Kernel patch submission checklist
|
2 |
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Here are some basic things that developers should do if they want to see their
|
5 |
|
|
kernel patch submissions accepted more quickly.
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
These are all above and beyond the documentation that is provided in
|
8 |
|
|
Documentation/SubmittingPatches and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux
|
9 |
|
|
kernel patches.
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
1: Builds cleanly with applicable or modified CONFIG options =y, =m, and
|
13 |
|
|
=n. No gcc warnings/errors, no linker warnings/errors.
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
2: Passes allnoconfig, allmodconfig
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
3: Builds on multiple CPU architectures by using local cross-compile tools
|
18 |
|
|
or something like PLM at OSDL.
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
4: ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it
|
21 |
|
|
tends to use `unsigned long' for 64-bit quantities.
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
5: Matches kernel coding style(!)
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
6: Any new or modified CONFIG options don't muck up the config menu.
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
7: All new Kconfig options have help text.
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
8: Has been carefully reviewed with respect to relevant Kconfig
|
30 |
|
|
combinations. This is very hard to get right with testing -- brainpower
|
31 |
|
|
pays off here.
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
9: Check cleanly with sparse.
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
10: Use 'make checkstack' and 'make namespacecheck' and fix any problems
|
36 |
|
|
that they find. Note: checkstack does not point out problems explicitly,
|
37 |
|
|
but any one function that uses more than 512 bytes on the stack is a
|
38 |
|
|
candidate for change.
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
11: Include kernel-doc to document global kernel APIs. (Not required for
|
41 |
|
|
static functions, but OK there also.) Use 'make htmldocs' or 'make
|
42 |
|
|
mandocs' to check the kernel-doc and fix any issues.
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
12: Has been tested with CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT,
|
45 |
|
|
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES,
|
46 |
|
|
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP all simultaneously
|
47 |
|
|
enabled.
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
13: Has been build- and runtime tested with and without CONFIG_SMP and
|
50 |
|
|
CONFIG_PREEMPT.
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
14: If the patch affects IO/Disk, etc: has been tested with and without
|
53 |
|
|
CONFIG_LBD.
|
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
15: All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled.
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
16: All new /proc entries are documented under Documentation/
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
17: All new kernel boot parameters are documented in
|
60 |
|
|
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
18: All new module parameters are documented with MODULE_PARM_DESC()
|
63 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
19: All new userspace interfaces are documented in Documentation/ABI/.
|
65 |
|
|
See Documentation/ABI/README for more information.
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
20: Check that it all passes `make headers_check'.
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
21: Has been checked with injection of at least slab and page-allocation
|
70 |
|
|
failures. See Documentation/fault-injection/.
|
71 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
If the new code is substantial, addition of subsystem-specific fault
|
73 |
|
|
injection might be appropriate.
|
74 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
22: Newly-added code has been compiled with `gcc -W' (use "make
|
76 |
|
|
EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W"). This will generate lots of noise, but is good for
|
77 |
|
|
finding bugs like "warning: comparison between signed and unsigned".
|
78 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
23: Tested after it has been merged into the -mm patchset to make sure
|
80 |
|
|
that it still works with all of the other queued patches and various
|
81 |
|
|
changes in the VM, VFS, and other subsystems.
|
82 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
24: Avoid whitespace damage such as indenting with spaces or whitespace
|
84 |
|
|
at the end of lines. You can test this by feeding the patch to
|
85 |
|
|
"git apply --check --whitespace=error-all"
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
25: Check your patch for general style as detailed in
|
88 |
|
|
Documentation/CodingStyle. Check for trivial violations with the
|
89 |
|
|
patch style checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl).
|
90 |
|
|
You should be able to justify all violations that remain in
|
91 |
|
|
your patch.
|