1 |
21 |
dgisselq |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
2 |
|
|
%%
|
3 |
|
|
%% Filename: spec.tex
|
4 |
|
|
%%
|
5 |
|
|
%% Project: Zip CPU -- a small, lightweight, RISC CPU soft core
|
6 |
|
|
%%
|
7 |
|
|
%% Purpose: This LaTeX file contains all of the documentation/description
|
8 |
33 |
dgisselq |
%% currently provided with this Zip CPU soft core. It supersedes
|
9 |
21 |
dgisselq |
%% any information about the instruction set or CPUs found
|
10 |
|
|
%% elsewhere. It's not nearly as interesting, though, as the PDF
|
11 |
|
|
%% file it creates, so I'd recommend reading that before diving
|
12 |
|
|
%% into this file. You should be able to find the PDF file in
|
13 |
|
|
%% the SVN distribution together with this PDF file and a copy of
|
14 |
|
|
%% the GPL-3.0 license this file is distributed under. If not,
|
15 |
|
|
%% just type 'make' in the doc directory and it (should) build
|
16 |
|
|
%% without a problem.
|
17 |
|
|
%%
|
18 |
|
|
%%
|
19 |
|
|
%% Creator: Dan Gisselquist
|
20 |
|
|
%% Gisselquist Technology, LLC
|
21 |
|
|
%%
|
22 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
23 |
|
|
%%
|
24 |
|
|
%% Copyright (C) 2015, Gisselquist Technology, LLC
|
25 |
|
|
%%
|
26 |
|
|
%% This program is free software (firmware): you can redistribute it and/or
|
27 |
|
|
%% modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published
|
28 |
|
|
%% by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at
|
29 |
|
|
%% your option) any later version.
|
30 |
|
|
%%
|
31 |
|
|
%% This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
32 |
|
|
%% ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTIBILITY or
|
33 |
|
|
%% FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
34 |
|
|
%% for more details.
|
35 |
|
|
%%
|
36 |
|
|
%% You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
|
37 |
|
|
%% with this program. (It's in the $(ROOT)/doc directory, run make with no
|
38 |
|
|
%% target there if the PDF file isn't present.) If not, see
|
39 |
|
|
%% <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/> for a copy.
|
40 |
|
|
%%
|
41 |
|
|
%% License: GPL, v3, as defined and found on www.gnu.org,
|
42 |
|
|
%% http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
|
43 |
|
|
%%
|
44 |
|
|
%%
|
45 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
46 |
|
|
\documentclass{gqtekspec}
|
47 |
|
|
\project{Zip CPU}
|
48 |
|
|
\title{Specification}
|
49 |
|
|
\author{Dan Gisselquist, Ph.D.}
|
50 |
|
|
\email{dgisselq (at) opencores.org}
|
51 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\revision{Rev.~0.5}
|
52 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\definecolor{webred}{rgb}{0.2,0,0}
|
53 |
|
|
\definecolor{webgreen}{rgb}{0,0.2,0}
|
54 |
|
|
\usepackage[dvips,ps2pdf,colorlinks=true,
|
55 |
|
|
anchorcolor=black,pagecolor=webgreen,pdfpagelabels,hypertexnames,
|
56 |
|
|
pdfauthor={Dan Gisselquist},
|
57 |
|
|
pdfsubject={Zip CPU}]{hyperref}
|
58 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\begin{document}
|
59 |
|
|
\pagestyle{gqtekspecplain}
|
60 |
|
|
\titlepage
|
61 |
|
|
\begin{license}
|
62 |
|
|
Copyright (C) \theyear\today, Gisselquist Technology, LLC
|
63 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
This project is free software (firmware): you can redistribute it and/or
|
65 |
|
|
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published
|
66 |
|
|
by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at
|
67 |
|
|
your option) any later version.
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
70 |
|
|
ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTIBILITY or
|
71 |
|
|
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
72 |
|
|
for more details.
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
|
75 |
|
|
with this program. If not, see \hbox{<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>} for a
|
76 |
|
|
copy.
|
77 |
|
|
\end{license}
|
78 |
|
|
\begin{revisionhistory}
|
79 |
39 |
dgisselq |
0.5 & 9/29/2015 & Gisselquist & Added pipelined memory access discussion.\\\hline
|
80 |
36 |
dgisselq |
0.4 & 9/19/2015 & Gisselquist & Added DMA controller, improved stall information, and self--assessment info.\\\hline
|
81 |
33 |
dgisselq |
0.3 & 8/22/2015 & Gisselquist & First completed draft\\\hline
|
82 |
24 |
dgisselq |
0.2 & 8/19/2015 & Gisselquist & Still Draft, more complete \\\hline
|
83 |
21 |
dgisselq |
0.1 & 8/17/2015 & Gisselquist & Incomplete First Draft \\\hline
|
84 |
|
|
\end{revisionhistory}
|
85 |
|
|
% Revision History
|
86 |
|
|
% Table of Contents, named Contents
|
87 |
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
88 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\listoffigures
|
89 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\listoftables
|
90 |
|
|
\begin{preface}
|
91 |
|
|
Many people have asked me why I am building the Zip CPU. ARM processors are
|
92 |
|
|
good and effective. Xilinx makes and markets Microblaze, Altera Nios, and both
|
93 |
|
|
have better toolsets than the Zip CPU will ever have. OpenRISC is also
|
94 |
24 |
dgisselq |
available, RISC--V may be replacing it. Why build a new processor?
|
95 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
96 |
|
|
The easiest, most obvious answer is the simple one: Because I can.
|
97 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
There's more to it, though. There's a lot that I would like to do with a
|
99 |
|
|
processor, and I want to be able to do it in a vendor independent fashion.
|
100 |
36 |
dgisselq |
First, I would like to be able to place this processor inside an FPGA. Without
|
101 |
|
|
paying royalties, ARM is out of the question. I would then like to be able to
|
102 |
|
|
generate Verilog code, both for the processor and the system it sits within,
|
103 |
|
|
that can run equivalently on both Xilinx and Altera chips, and that can be
|
104 |
|
|
easily ported from one manufacturer's chipsets to another. Even more, before
|
105 |
|
|
purchasing a chip or a board, I would like to know that my soft core works. I
|
106 |
|
|
would like to build a test bench to test components with, and Verilator is my
|
107 |
|
|
chosen test bench. This forces me to use all Verilog, and it prevents me from
|
108 |
|
|
using any proprietary cores. For this reason, Microblaze and Nios are out of
|
109 |
|
|
the question.
|
110 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
111 |
|
|
Why not OpenRISC? That's a hard question. The OpenRISC team has done some
|
112 |
|
|
wonderful work on an amazing processor, and I'll have to admit that I am
|
113 |
|
|
envious of what they've accomplished. I would like to port binutils to the
|
114 |
|
|
Zip CPU, as I would like to port GCC and GDB. They are way ahead of me. The
|
115 |
|
|
OpenRISC processor, however, is complex and hefty at about 4,500 LUTs. It has
|
116 |
|
|
a lot of features of modern CPUs within it that ... well, let's just say it's
|
117 |
|
|
not the little guy on the block. The Zip CPU is lighter weight, costing only
|
118 |
32 |
dgisselq |
about 2,300 LUTs with no peripherals, and 3,200 LUTs with some very basic
|
119 |
21 |
dgisselq |
peripherals.
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
My final reason is that I'm building the Zip CPU as a learning experience. The
|
122 |
|
|
Zip CPU has allowed me to learn a lot about how CPUs work on a very micro
|
123 |
|
|
level. For the first time, I am beginning to understand many of the Computer
|
124 |
|
|
Architecture lessons from years ago.
|
125 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
To summarize: Because I can, because it is open source, because it is light
|
127 |
|
|
weight, and as an exercise in learning.
|
128 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
\end{preface}
|
130 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
\chapter{Introduction}
|
132 |
|
|
\pagenumbering{arabic}
|
133 |
|
|
\setcounter{page}{1}
|
134 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
136 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The original goal of the Zip CPU was to be a very simple CPU. You might
|
137 |
21 |
dgisselq |
think of it as a poor man's alternative to the OpenRISC architecture.
|
138 |
|
|
For this reason, all instructions have been designed to be as simple as
|
139 |
|
|
possible, and are all designed to be executed in one instruction cycle per
|
140 |
|
|
instruction, barring pipeline stalls. Indeed, even the bus has been simplified
|
141 |
|
|
to a constant 32-bit width, with no option for more or less. This has
|
142 |
|
|
resulted in the choice to drop push and pop instructions, pre-increment and
|
143 |
|
|
post-decrement addressing modes, and more.
|
144 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
For those who like buzz words, the Zip CPU is:
|
146 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
147 |
|
|
\item A 32-bit CPU: All registers are 32-bits, addresses are 32-bits,
|
148 |
|
|
instructions are 32-bits wide, etc.
|
149 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\item A RISC CPU. There is no microcode for executing instructions. All
|
150 |
|
|
instructions are designed to be completed in one clock cycle.
|
151 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item A Load/Store architecture. (Only load and store instructions
|
152 |
|
|
can access memory.)
|
153 |
|
|
\item Wishbone compliant. All peripherals are accessed just like
|
154 |
|
|
memory across this bus.
|
155 |
|
|
\item A Von-Neumann architecture. (The instructions and data share a
|
156 |
|
|
common bus.)
|
157 |
|
|
\item A pipelined architecture, having stages for {\bf Prefetch},
|
158 |
|
|
{\bf Decode}, {\bf Read-Operand}, the {\bf ALU/Memory}
|
159 |
24 |
dgisselq |
unit, and {\bf Write-back}. See Fig.~\ref{fig:cpu}
|
160 |
|
|
\begin{figure}\begin{center}
|
161 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{../gfx/cpu.eps}
|
162 |
|
|
\caption{Zip CPU internal pipeline architecture}\label{fig:cpu}
|
163 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{figure}
|
164 |
|
|
for a diagram of this structure.
|
165 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item Completely open source, licensed under the GPL.\footnote{Should you
|
166 |
|
|
need a copy of the Zip CPU licensed under other terms, please
|
167 |
|
|
contact me.}
|
168 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
169 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Now, however, that I've worked on the Zip CPU for a while, it is not nearly
|
171 |
|
|
as simple as I originally hoped. Worse, I've had to adjust to create
|
172 |
|
|
capabilities that I was never expecting to need. These include:
|
173 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
174 |
33 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf External Debug:} Once placed upon an FPGA, some external means is
|
175 |
21 |
dgisselq |
still necessary to debug this CPU. That means that there needs to be
|
176 |
|
|
an external register that can control the CPU: reset it, halt it, step
|
177 |
24 |
dgisselq |
it, and tell whether it is running or not. My chosen interface
|
178 |
|
|
includes a second register similar to this control register. This
|
179 |
|
|
second register allows the external controller or debugger to examine
|
180 |
21 |
dgisselq |
registers internal to the CPU.
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
\item {\bf Internal Debug:} Being able to run a debugger from within
|
183 |
|
|
a user process requires an ability to step a user process from
|
184 |
|
|
within a debugger. It also requires a break instruction that can
|
185 |
|
|
be substituted for any other instruction, and substituted back.
|
186 |
|
|
The break is actually difficult: the break instruction cannot be
|
187 |
|
|
allowed to execute. That way, upon a break, the debugger should
|
188 |
|
|
be able to jump back into the user process to step the instruction
|
189 |
|
|
that would've been at the break point initially, and then to
|
190 |
|
|
replace the break after passing it.
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Incidentally, this break messes with the prefetch cache and the
|
193 |
|
|
pipeline: if you change an instruction partially through the pipeline,
|
194 |
|
|
the whole pipeline needs to be cleansed. Likewise if you change
|
195 |
|
|
an instruction in memory, you need to make sure the cache is reloaded
|
196 |
|
|
with the new instruction.
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf Prefetch Cache:} My original implementation had a very
|
199 |
|
|
simple prefetch stage. Any time the PC changed the prefetch would go
|
200 |
|
|
and fetch the new instruction. While this was perhaps this simplest
|
201 |
|
|
approach, it cost roughly five clocks for every instruction. This
|
202 |
|
|
was deemed unacceptable, as I wanted a CPU that could execute
|
203 |
|
|
instructions in one cycle. I therefore have a prefetch cache that
|
204 |
|
|
issues pipelined wishbone accesses to memory and then pushes
|
205 |
|
|
instructions at the CPU. Sadly, this accounts for about 20\% of the
|
206 |
|
|
logic in the entire CPU, or 15\% of the logic in the entire system.
|
207 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
\item {\bf Operating System:} In order to support an operating system,
|
210 |
|
|
interrupts and so forth, the CPU needs to support supervisor and
|
211 |
|
|
user modes, as well as a means of switching between them. For example,
|
212 |
|
|
the user needs a means of executing a system call. This is the
|
213 |
|
|
purpose of the {\bf `trap'} instruction. This instruction needs to
|
214 |
|
|
place the CPU into supervisor mode (here equivalent to disabling
|
215 |
|
|
interrupts), as well as handing it a parameter such as identifying
|
216 |
|
|
which O/S function was called.
|
217 |
|
|
|
218 |
24 |
dgisselq |
My initial approach to building a trap instruction was to create an external
|
219 |
|
|
peripheral which, when written to, would generate an interrupt and could
|
220 |
|
|
return the last value written to it. In practice, this approach didn't work
|
221 |
|
|
at all: the CPU executed two instructions while waiting for the
|
222 |
|
|
trap interrupt to take place. Since then, I've decided to keep the rest of
|
223 |
|
|
the CC register for that purpose so that a write to the CC register, with the
|
224 |
|
|
GIE bit cleared, could be used to execute a trap. This has other problems,
|
225 |
|
|
though, primarily in the limitation of the uses of the CC register. In
|
226 |
|
|
particular, the CC register is the best place to put CPU state information and
|
227 |
|
|
to ``announce'' special CPU features (floating point, etc). So the trap
|
228 |
|
|
instruction still switches to interrupt mode, but the CC register is not
|
229 |
|
|
nearly as useful for telling the supervisor mode processor what trap is being
|
230 |
|
|
executed.
|
231 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
232 |
|
|
Modern timesharing systems also depend upon a {\bf Timer} interrupt
|
233 |
24 |
dgisselq |
to handle task swapping. For the Zip CPU, this interrupt is handled
|
234 |
|
|
external to the CPU as part of the CPU System, found in {\tt zipsystem.v}.
|
235 |
|
|
The timer module itself is found in {\tt ziptimer.v}.
|
236 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
237 |
|
|
\item {\bf Pipeline Stalls:} My original plan was to not support pipeline
|
238 |
|
|
stalls at all, but rather to require the compiler to properly schedule
|
239 |
24 |
dgisselq |
all instructions so that stalls would never be necessary. After trying
|
240 |
21 |
dgisselq |
to build such an architecture, I gave up, having learned some things:
|
241 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
For example, in order to facilitate interrupt handling and debug
|
243 |
|
|
stepping, the CPU needs to know what instructions have finished, and
|
244 |
|
|
which have not. In other words, it needs to know where it can restart
|
245 |
|
|
the pipeline from. Once restarted, it must act as though it had
|
246 |
24 |
dgisselq |
never stopped. This killed my idea of delayed branching, since what
|
247 |
|
|
would be the appropriate program counter to restart at? The one the
|
248 |
|
|
CPU was going to branch to, or the ones in the delay slots? This
|
249 |
|
|
also makes the idea of compressed instruction codes difficult, since,
|
250 |
|
|
again, where do you restart on interrupt?
|
251 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
252 |
|
|
So I switched to a model of discrete execution: Once an instruction
|
253 |
|
|
enters into either the ALU or memory unit, the instruction is
|
254 |
|
|
guaranteed to complete. If the logic recognizes a branch or a
|
255 |
|
|
condition that would render the instruction entering into this stage
|
256 |
33 |
dgisselq |
possibly inappropriate (i.e. a conditional branch preceding a store
|
257 |
21 |
dgisselq |
instruction for example), then the pipeline stalls for one cycle
|
258 |
|
|
until the conditional branch completes. Then, if it generates a new
|
259 |
33 |
dgisselq |
PC address, the stages preceding are all wiped clean.
|
260 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
261 |
|
|
The discrete execution model allows such things as sleeping: if the
|
262 |
24 |
dgisselq |
CPU is put to ``sleep,'' the ALU and memory stages stall and back up
|
263 |
21 |
dgisselq |
everything before them. Likewise, anything that has entered the ALU
|
264 |
|
|
or memory stage when the CPU is placed to sleep continues to completion.
|
265 |
|
|
To handle this logic, each pipeline stage has three control signals:
|
266 |
|
|
a valid signal, a stall signal, and a clock enable signal. In
|
267 |
|
|
general, a stage stalls if it's contents are valid and the next step
|
268 |
|
|
is stalled. This allows the pipeline to fill any time a later stage
|
269 |
|
|
stalls.
|
270 |
|
|
|
271 |
24 |
dgisselq |
This approach is also different from other pipeline approaches. Instead
|
272 |
|
|
of keeping the entire pipeline filled, each stage is treated
|
273 |
|
|
independently. Therefore, individual stages may move forward as long
|
274 |
|
|
as the subsequent stage is available, regardless of whether the stage
|
275 |
|
|
behind it is filled.
|
276 |
|
|
|
277 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf Verilog Modules:} When examining how other processors worked
|
278 |
|
|
here on open cores, many of them had one separate module per pipeline
|
279 |
|
|
stage. While this appeared to me to be a fascinating and commendable
|
280 |
|
|
idea, my own implementation didn't work out quite so nicely.
|
281 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
As an example, the decode module produces a {\em lot} of
|
283 |
|
|
control wires and registers. Creating a module out of this, with
|
284 |
|
|
only the simplest of logic within it, seemed to be more a lesson
|
285 |
|
|
in passing wires around, rather than encapsulating logic.
|
286 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
Another example was the register writeback section. I would love
|
288 |
|
|
this section to be a module in its own right, and many have made them
|
289 |
|
|
such. However, other modules depend upon writeback results other
|
290 |
|
|
than just what's placed in the register (i.e., the control wires).
|
291 |
|
|
For these reasons, I didn't manage to fit this section into it's
|
292 |
|
|
own module.
|
293 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
The result is that the majority of the CPU code can be found in
|
295 |
|
|
the {\tt zipcpu.v} file.
|
296 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
297 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
With that introduction out of the way, let's move on to the instruction
|
299 |
|
|
set.
|
300 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
\chapter{CPU Architecture}\label{chap:arch}
|
302 |
|
|
|
303 |
24 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU supports a set of two operand instructions, where the second operand
|
304 |
21 |
dgisselq |
(always a register) is the result. The only exception is the store instruction,
|
305 |
|
|
where the first operand (always a register) is the source of the data to be
|
306 |
|
|
stored.
|
307 |
|
|
|
308 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\section{Simplified Bus}
|
309 |
|
|
The bus architecture of the Zip CPU is that of a simplified WISHBONE bus.
|
310 |
|
|
It has been simplified in this fashion: all operations are 32--bit operations.
|
311 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The bus is neither little endian nor big endian. For this reason, all words
|
312 |
24 |
dgisselq |
are 32--bits. All instructions are also 32--bits wide. Everything has been
|
313 |
|
|
built around the 32--bit word.
|
314 |
|
|
|
315 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Register Set}
|
316 |
|
|
The Zip CPU supports two sets of sixteen 32-bit registers, a supervisor
|
317 |
24 |
dgisselq |
and a user set as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:regset}.
|
318 |
|
|
\begin{figure}\begin{center}
|
319 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{../gfx/regset.eps}
|
320 |
|
|
\caption{Zip CPU Register File}\label{fig:regset}
|
321 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{figure}
|
322 |
|
|
The supervisor set is used in interrupt mode when interrupts are disabled,
|
323 |
|
|
whereas the user set is used otherwise. Of this register set, the Program
|
324 |
|
|
Counter (PC) is register 15, whereas the status register (SR) or condition
|
325 |
|
|
code register
|
326 |
21 |
dgisselq |
(CC) is register 14. By convention, the stack pointer will be register 13 and
|
327 |
24 |
dgisselq |
noted as (SP)--although there is nothing special about this register other
|
328 |
|
|
than this convention.
|
329 |
21 |
dgisselq |
The CPU can access both register sets via move instructions from the
|
330 |
|
|
supervisor state, whereas the user state can only access the user registers.
|
331 |
|
|
|
332 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The status register is special, and bears further mention. As shown in
|
333 |
|
|
Fig.~\ref{tbl:cc-register},
|
334 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
335 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
336 |
|
|
31\ldots 11 & R/W & Reserved for future uses\\\hline
|
337 |
|
|
10 & R & (Reserved for) Bus-Error Flag\\\hline
|
338 |
|
|
9 & R & Trap, or user interrupt, Flag. Cleared on return to userspace.\\\hline
|
339 |
|
|
8 & R & (Reserved for) Illegal Instruction Flag\\\hline
|
340 |
|
|
7 & R/W & Break--Enable\\\hline
|
341 |
|
|
6 & R/W & Step\\\hline
|
342 |
|
|
5 & R/W & Global Interrupt Enable (GIE)\\\hline
|
343 |
|
|
4 & R/W & Sleep. When GIE is also set, the CPU waits for an interrupt.\\\hline
|
344 |
|
|
3 & R/W & Overflow\\\hline
|
345 |
|
|
2 & R/W & Negative. The sign bit was set as a result of the last ALU instruction.\\\hline
|
346 |
|
|
1 & R/W & Carry\\\hline
|
347 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
349 |
|
|
\caption{Condition Code Register Bit Assignment}\label{tbl:cc-register}
|
350 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
351 |
|
|
the lower 11~bits of the status register form
|
352 |
|
|
a set of CPU state and condition codes. Writes to other bits of this register
|
353 |
|
|
are preserved.
|
354 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
355 |
33 |
dgisselq |
Of the condition codes, the bottom four bits are the current flags:
|
356 |
21 |
dgisselq |
Zero (Z),
|
357 |
|
|
Carry (C),
|
358 |
|
|
Negative (N),
|
359 |
|
|
and Overflow (V).
|
360 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
The next bit is a clock enable (0 to enable) or sleep bit (1 to put
|
362 |
|
|
the CPU to sleep). Setting this bit will cause the CPU to
|
363 |
|
|
wait for an interrupt (if interrupts are enabled), or to
|
364 |
|
|
completely halt (if interrupts are disabled).
|
365 |
33 |
dgisselq |
|
366 |
21 |
dgisselq |
The sixth bit is a global interrupt enable bit (GIE). When this
|
367 |
32 |
dgisselq |
sixth bit is a `1' interrupts will be enabled, else disabled. When
|
368 |
21 |
dgisselq |
interrupts are disabled, the CPU will be in supervisor mode, otherwise
|
369 |
|
|
it is in user mode. Thus, to execute a context switch, one only
|
370 |
|
|
need enable or disable interrupts. (When an interrupt line goes
|
371 |
|
|
high, interrupts will automatically be disabled, as the CPU goes
|
372 |
32 |
dgisselq |
and deals with its context switch.) Special logic has been added to
|
373 |
|
|
keep the user mode from setting the sleep register and clearing the
|
374 |
|
|
GIE register at the same time, with clearing the GIE register taking
|
375 |
|
|
precedence.
|
376 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
377 |
|
|
The seventh bit is a step bit. This bit can be
|
378 |
|
|
set from supervisor mode only. After setting this bit, should
|
379 |
|
|
the supervisor mode process switch to user mode, it would then
|
380 |
|
|
accomplish one instruction in user mode before returning to supervisor
|
381 |
|
|
mode. Then, upon return to supervisor mode, this bit will
|
382 |
|
|
be automatically cleared. This bit has no effect on the CPU while in
|
383 |
|
|
supervisor mode.
|
384 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
This functionality was added to enable a userspace debugger
|
386 |
|
|
functionality on a user process, working through supervisor mode
|
387 |
|
|
of course.
|
388 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
390 |
24 |
dgisselq |
The eighth bit is a break enable bit. This controls whether a break
|
391 |
|
|
instruction in user mode will halt the processor for an external debugger
|
392 |
|
|
(break enabled), or whether the break instruction will simply send send the
|
393 |
|
|
CPU into interrupt mode. Encountering a break in supervisor mode will
|
394 |
|
|
halt the CPU independent of the break enable bit. This bit can only be set
|
395 |
|
|
within supervisor mode.
|
396 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
397 |
32 |
dgisselq |
% Should break enable be a supervisor mode bit, while the break enable bit
|
398 |
|
|
% in user mode is a break has taken place bit?
|
399 |
|
|
%
|
400 |
|
|
|
401 |
21 |
dgisselq |
This functionality was added to enable an external debugger to
|
402 |
|
|
set and manage breakpoints.
|
403 |
|
|
|
404 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The ninth bit is reserved for an illegal instruction bit. When the CPU
|
405 |
|
|
tries to execute either a non-existant instruction, or an instruction from
|
406 |
|
|
an address that produces a bus error, the CPU will (once implemented) switch
|
407 |
|
|
to supervisor mode while setting this bit. The bit will automatically be
|
408 |
|
|
cleared upon any return to user mode.
|
409 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
410 |
|
|
The tenth bit is a trap bit. It is set whenever the user requests a soft
|
411 |
|
|
interrupt, and cleared on any return to userspace command. This allows the
|
412 |
|
|
supervisor, in supervisor mode, to determine whether it got to supervisor
|
413 |
|
|
mode from a trap or from an external interrupt or both.
|
414 |
|
|
|
415 |
39 |
dgisselq |
These status register bits are summarized in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:ccbits}.
|
416 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
417 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
418 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
|
419 |
|
|
Bit & Meaning \\\hline
|
420 |
|
|
9 & Soft trap, set on a trap from user mode, cleared when returning to user mode\\\hline
|
421 |
|
|
8 & (Reserved for) Floating point enable \\\hline
|
422 |
|
|
7 & Halt on break, to support an external debugger \\\hline
|
423 |
|
|
6 & Step, single step the CPU in user mode\\\hline
|
424 |
|
|
5 & GIE, or Global Interrupt Enable \\\hline
|
425 |
|
|
4 & Sleep \\\hline
|
426 |
|
|
3 & V, or overflow bit.\\\hline
|
427 |
|
|
2 & N, or negative bit.\\\hline
|
428 |
|
|
1 & C, or carry bit.\\\hline
|
429 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
431 |
|
|
\caption{Condition Code / Status Register Bits}\label{tbl:ccbits}
|
432 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
433 |
|
|
|
434 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Conditional Instructions}
|
435 |
36 |
dgisselq |
Most, although not quite all, instructions may be conditionally executed. From
|
436 |
21 |
dgisselq |
the four condition code flags, eight conditions are defined. These are shown
|
437 |
|
|
in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:conditions}.
|
438 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
439 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
440 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l}
|
441 |
|
|
Code & Mneumonic & Condition \\\hline
|
442 |
|
|
3'h0 & None & Always execute the instruction \\
|
443 |
|
|
3'h1 & {\tt .Z} & Only execute when 'Z' is set \\
|
444 |
|
|
3'h2 & {\tt .NE} & Only execute when 'Z' is not set \\
|
445 |
|
|
3'h3 & {\tt .GE} & Greater than or equal ('N' not set, 'Z' irrelevant) \\
|
446 |
|
|
3'h4 & {\tt .GT} & Greater than ('N' not set, 'Z' not set) \\
|
447 |
24 |
dgisselq |
3'h5 & {\tt .LT} & Less than ('N' set) \\
|
448 |
21 |
dgisselq |
3'h6 & {\tt .C} & Carry set\\
|
449 |
|
|
3'h7 & {\tt .V} & Overflow set\\
|
450 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
451 |
|
|
\caption{Conditions for conditional operand execution}\label{tbl:conditions}
|
452 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
453 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
454 |
24 |
dgisselq |
There is no condition code for less than or equal, not C or not V. Sorry,
|
455 |
36 |
dgisselq |
I ran out of space in 3--bits. Conditioning on a non--supported condition
|
456 |
|
|
is still possible, but it will take an extra instruction and a pipeline stall. (Ex: \hbox{\em (Stall)}; \hbox{\tt TST \$4,CC;} \hbox{\tt STO.NZ R0,(R1)})
|
457 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
458 |
36 |
dgisselq |
Conditionally executed ALU instructions will not further adjust the
|
459 |
|
|
condition codes.
|
460 |
|
|
|
461 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Operand B}
|
462 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Many instruction forms have a 21-bit source ``Operand B'' associated with them.
|
463 |
21 |
dgisselq |
This Operand B is either equal to a register plus a signed immediate offset,
|
464 |
|
|
or an immediate offset by itself. This value is encoded as shown in
|
465 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:opb}.
|
466 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
467 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}\hline
|
468 |
|
|
Bit 20 & 19 \ldots 16 & 15 \ldots 0 \\\hline
|
469 |
24 |
dgisselq |
1'b0 & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{20--bit Signed Immediate value} \\\hline
|
470 |
|
|
1'b1 & 4-bit Register & 16--bit Signed immediate offset \\\hline
|
471 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{tabular}
|
472 |
|
|
\caption{Bit allocation for Operand B}\label{tbl:opb}
|
473 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
474 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
475 |
33 |
dgisselq |
Sixteen and twenty bit immediate values don't make sense for all instructions.
|
476 |
|
|
For example, what is the point of a 20--bit immediate when executing a 16--bit
|
477 |
24 |
dgisselq |
multiply? Likewise, why have a 16--bit immediate when adding to a logical
|
478 |
|
|
or arithmetic shift? In these cases, the extra bits are reserved for future
|
479 |
|
|
instruction possibilities.
|
480 |
|
|
|
481 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Address Modes}
|
482 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU supports two addressing modes: register plus immediate, and
|
483 |
21 |
dgisselq |
immediate address. Addresses are therefore encoded in the same fashion as
|
484 |
|
|
Operand B's, shown above.
|
485 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
A lot of long hard thought was put into whether to allow pre/post increment
|
487 |
|
|
and decrement addressing modes. Finding no way to use these operators without
|
488 |
32 |
dgisselq |
taking two or more clocks per instruction,\footnote{The two clocks figure
|
489 |
|
|
comes from the design of the register set, allowing only one write per clock.
|
490 |
|
|
That write is either from the memory unit or the ALU, but never both.} these
|
491 |
|
|
addressing modes have been
|
492 |
21 |
dgisselq |
removed from the realm of possibilities. This means that the Zip CPU has no
|
493 |
|
|
native way of executing push, pop, return, or jump to subroutine operations.
|
494 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Each of these instructions can be emulated with a set of instructions from the
|
495 |
|
|
existing set.
|
496 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
497 |
|
|
\section{Move Operands}
|
498 |
|
|
The previous set of operands would be perfect and complete, save only that
|
499 |
24 |
dgisselq |
the CPU needs access to non--supervisory registers while in supervisory mode.
|
500 |
|
|
Therefore, the MOV instruction is special and offers access to these registers
|
501 |
|
|
\ldots when in supervisory mode. To keep the compiler simple, the extra bits
|
502 |
|
|
are ignored in non-supervisory mode (as though they didn't exist), rather than
|
503 |
|
|
being mapped to new instructions or additional capabilities. The bits
|
504 |
|
|
indicating which register set each register lies within are the A-Usr and
|
505 |
|
|
B-Usr bits. When set to a one, these refer to a user mode register. When set
|
506 |
|
|
to a zero, these refer to a register in the current mode, whether user or
|
507 |
|
|
supervisor. Further, because a load immediate instruction exists, there is no
|
508 |
|
|
move capability between an immediate and a register: all moves come from either
|
509 |
|
|
a register or a register plus an offset.
|
510 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
511 |
24 |
dgisselq |
This actually leads to a bit of a problem: since the MOV instruction encodes
|
512 |
|
|
which register set each register is coming from or moving to, how shall a
|
513 |
|
|
compiler or assembler know how to compile a MOV instruction without knowing
|
514 |
|
|
the mode of the CPU at the time? For this reason, the compiler will assume
|
515 |
|
|
all MOV registers are supervisor registers, and display them as normal.
|
516 |
|
|
Anything with the user bit set will be treated as a user register. The CPU
|
517 |
|
|
will quietly ignore the supervisor bits while in user mode, and anything
|
518 |
36 |
dgisselq |
marked as a user register will always be valid.
|
519 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
520 |
|
|
\section{Multiply Operations}
|
521 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU supports two Multiply operations, a 16x16 bit signed multiply
|
522 |
|
|
({\tt MPYS}) and a 16x16 bit unsigned multiply ({\tt MPYU}). In both
|
523 |
21 |
dgisselq |
cases, the operand is a register plus a 16-bit immediate, subject to the
|
524 |
|
|
rule that the register cannot be the PC or CC registers. The PC register
|
525 |
|
|
field has been stolen to create a multiply by immediate instruction. The
|
526 |
|
|
CC register field is reserved.
|
527 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
\section{Floating Point}
|
529 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU does not (yet) support floating point operations. However, the
|
530 |
32 |
dgisselq |
instruction set reserves two possibilities for future floating point
|
531 |
|
|
operations.
|
532 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
533 |
32 |
dgisselq |
The first floating point operation hole in the instruction set involves
|
534 |
36 |
dgisselq |
setting a proposed (but non-existent) floating point bit in the CC register.
|
535 |
|
|
The next instruction
|
536 |
|
|
would then simply interpret its operands as floating point instructions.
|
537 |
32 |
dgisselq |
Not all instructions, however, have floating point equivalents. Further, the
|
538 |
|
|
immediate fields do not apply in floating point mode, and must be set to
|
539 |
|
|
zero. Not all instructions make sense as floating point operations.
|
540 |
|
|
Therefore, only the CMP, SUB, ADD, and MPY instructions may be issued as
|
541 |
|
|
floating point instructions. Other instructions allow the examining of the
|
542 |
|
|
floating point bit in the CC register. In all cases, the floating point bit
|
543 |
|
|
is cleared one instruction after it is set.
|
544 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
545 |
32 |
dgisselq |
The other possibility for floating point operations involves exploiting the
|
546 |
|
|
hole in the instruction set that the NOOP and BREAK instructions reside within.
|
547 |
36 |
dgisselq |
These two instructions use 24--bits of address space, when only a single bit
|
548 |
|
|
is necessary. A simple adjustment to this space could create instructions
|
549 |
|
|
with 4--bit register addresses for each register, a 3--bit field for
|
550 |
|
|
conditional execution, and a 2--bit field for which operation.
|
551 |
|
|
In this fashion, such a floating point capability would only fill 13--bits of
|
552 |
|
|
the 24--bit field, still leaving lots of room for expansion.
|
553 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
554 |
|
|
In both cases, the Zip CPU would support 32--bit single precision floats
|
555 |
36 |
dgisselq |
only, since other choices would complicate the pipeline.
|
556 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
557 |
|
|
The current architecture does not support a floating point not-implemented
|
558 |
|
|
interrupt. Any soft floating point emulation must be done deliberately.
|
559 |
|
|
|
560 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Native Instructions}
|
561 |
|
|
The instruction set for the Zip CPU is summarized in
|
562 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:zip-instructions}.
|
563 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
564 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|c|}\hline
|
565 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\rowcolor[gray]{0.85}
|
566 |
21 |
dgisselq |
Op Code & \multicolumn{8}{c|}{31\ldots24} & \multicolumn{8}{c|}{23\ldots 16}
|
567 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{8}{c|}{15\ldots 8} & \multicolumn{8}{c|}{7\ldots 0}
|
568 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& Sets CC? \\\hline\hline
|
569 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt CMP(Sub)} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h0}
|
570 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{D. Reg}
|
571 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
572 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
573 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
574 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt TST(And)} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h1}
|
575 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{D. Reg}
|
576 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
577 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
578 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
579 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt MOV} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h2}
|
580 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{D. Reg}
|
581 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
582 |
|
|
& A-Usr
|
583 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{B-Reg}
|
584 |
|
|
& B-Usr
|
585 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{15}{l|}{15'bit signed offset}
|
586 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
587 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LODI} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h3}
|
588 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
589 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{24}{l|}{24'bit Signed Immediate}
|
590 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
591 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt NOOP} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
592 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'he}
|
593 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{24}{l|}{24'h00}
|
594 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
595 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt BREAK} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
596 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'he}
|
597 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{24}{l|}{24'h01}
|
598 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
599 |
36 |
dgisselq |
{\em Reserved} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
600 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'he}
|
601 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{24}{l|}{24'bits, but not 0 or 1.}
|
602 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
603 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LODIHI }& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
604 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hf}
|
605 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
606 |
|
|
& 1'b1
|
607 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
608 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Immediate}
|
609 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
610 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LODILO} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
611 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hf}
|
612 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
613 |
|
|
& 1'b0
|
614 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
615 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Immediate}
|
616 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
617 |
39 |
dgisselq |
16-b {\tt MPYU} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
618 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
619 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
620 |
|
|
& 1'b0 & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{Reg}
|
621 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Offset}
|
622 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
623 |
39 |
dgisselq |
16-b {\tt MPYU}(I) & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
624 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
625 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
626 |
|
|
& 1'b0 & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hf}
|
627 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Offset}
|
628 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
629 |
39 |
dgisselq |
16-b {\tt MPYS} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
630 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
631 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
632 |
|
|
& 1'b1 & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{Reg}
|
633 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Offset}
|
634 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
635 |
39 |
dgisselq |
16-b {\tt MPYS}(I) & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h4}
|
636 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
637 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
638 |
|
|
& 1'b1 & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hf}
|
639 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{16}{l|}{16-bit Offset}
|
640 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
641 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt ROL} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h5}
|
642 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
643 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
644 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B, truncated to low order 5 bits}
|
645 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
646 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LOD} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h6}
|
647 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
648 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
649 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B address}
|
650 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
651 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt STO} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h7}
|
652 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{D. Reg}
|
653 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
654 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B address}
|
655 |
|
|
& \\\hline
|
656 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt SUB} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h8}
|
657 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
658 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
659 |
32 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
660 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Yes \\\hline
|
661 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt AND} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'h9}
|
662 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
663 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
664 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
665 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
666 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt ADD} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'ha}
|
667 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
668 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
669 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
670 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
671 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt OR} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hb}
|
672 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
673 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
674 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
675 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
676 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt XOR} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hc}
|
677 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
678 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
679 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B}
|
680 |
|
|
& Yes \\\hline
|
681 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LSL/ASL} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hd}
|
682 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
683 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
684 |
33 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B, imm. truncated to 6 bits}
|
685 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Yes \\\hline
|
686 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt ASR} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'he}
|
687 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
688 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
689 |
33 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B, imm. truncated to 6 bits}
|
690 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Yes \\\hline
|
691 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LSR} & \multicolumn{4}{l|}{4'hf}
|
692 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{4}{l|}{R. Reg}
|
693 |
|
|
& \multicolumn{3}{l|}{Cond.}
|
694 |
33 |
dgisselq |
& \multicolumn{21}{l|}{Operand B, imm. truncated to 6 bits}
|
695 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Yes \\\hline
|
696 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
697 |
|
|
\caption{Zip CPU Instruction Set}\label{tbl:zip-instructions}
|
698 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
699 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
As you can see, there's lots of room for instruction set expansion. The
|
701 |
24 |
dgisselq |
NOOP and BREAK instructions are the only instructions within one particular
|
702 |
36 |
dgisselq |
24--bit hole. The rest of this space is reserved for future enhancements.
|
703 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
704 |
|
|
\section{Derived Instructions}
|
705 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU supports many other common instructions, but not all of them
|
706 |
24 |
dgisselq |
are single cycle instructions. The derived instruction tables,
|
707 |
36 |
dgisselq |
Tbls.~\ref{tbl:derived-1}, \ref{tbl:derived-2}, \ref{tbl:derived-3}
|
708 |
|
|
and~\ref{tbl:derived-4},
|
709 |
21 |
dgisselq |
help to capture some of how these other instructions may be implemented on
|
710 |
36 |
dgisselq |
the Zip CPU. Many of these instructions will have assembly equivalents,
|
711 |
21 |
dgisselq |
such as the branch instructions, to facilitate working with the CPU.
|
712 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
713 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{p{1.4in}p{1.5in}p{3in}}\\\hline
|
714 |
|
|
Mapped & Actual & Notes \\\hline
|
715 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt ABS Rx}
|
716 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt TST -1,Rx\\NEG.LT Rx}
|
717 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& Absolute value, depends upon derived NEG.\\\hline
|
718 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\parbox[t]{1.4in}{\tt ADD Ra,Rx\\ADDC Rb,Ry}
|
719 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt Add Ra,Rx\\ADD.C \$1,Ry\\Add Rb,Ry}
|
720 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Add with carry \\\hline
|
721 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt BRA.Cond +/-\$Addr}
|
722 |
|
|
& \hbox{\tt MOV.cond \$Addr+PC,PC}
|
723 |
24 |
dgisselq |
& Branch or jump on condition. Works for 15--bit
|
724 |
|
|
signed address offsets.\\\hline
|
725 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt BRA.Cond +/-\$Addr}
|
726 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LDI \$Addr,Rx \\ ADD.cond Rx,PC}
|
727 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Branch/jump on condition. Works for
|
728 |
|
|
23 bit address offsets, but costs a register, an extra instruction,
|
729 |
33 |
dgisselq |
and sets the flags. \\\hline
|
730 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt BNC PC+\$Addr}
|
731 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt Test \$Carry,CC \\ MOV.Z PC+\$Addr,PC}
|
732 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Example of a branch on an unsupported
|
733 |
|
|
condition, in this case a branch on not carry \\\hline
|
734 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt BUSY } & {\tt MOV \$-1(PC),PC} & Execute an infinite loop \\\hline
|
735 |
|
|
{\tt CLRF.NZ Rx }
|
736 |
|
|
& {\tt XOR.NZ Rx,Rx}
|
737 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Clear Rx, and flags, if the Z-bit is not set \\\hline
|
738 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt CLR Rx }
|
739 |
|
|
& {\tt LDI \$0,Rx}
|
740 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Clears Rx, leaves flags untouched. This instruction cannot be
|
741 |
|
|
conditional. \\\hline
|
742 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt EXCH.W Rx }
|
743 |
|
|
& {\tt ROL \$16,Rx}
|
744 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Exchanges the top and bottom 16'bit words of Rx \\\hline
|
745 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt HALT }
|
746 |
|
|
& {\tt Or \$SLEEP,CC}
|
747 |
|
|
& This only works when issued in interrupt/supervisor mode. In user
|
748 |
|
|
mode this is simply a wait until interrupt instruction. \\\hline
|
749 |
|
|
{\tt INT } & {\tt LDI \$0,CC} & \\\hline
|
750 |
|
|
{\tt IRET}
|
751 |
|
|
& {\tt OR \$GIE,CC}
|
752 |
|
|
& Also known as an RTU instruction (Return to Userspace) \\\hline
|
753 |
|
|
{\tt JMP R6+\$Addr}
|
754 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV \$Addr(R6),PC}
|
755 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& \\\hline
|
756 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt JSR PC+\$Addr}
|
757 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt SUB \$1,SP \\\
|
758 |
21 |
dgisselq |
MOV \$3+PC,R0 \\
|
759 |
|
|
STO R0,1(SP) \\
|
760 |
|
|
MOV \$Addr+PC,PC \\
|
761 |
|
|
ADD \$1,SP}
|
762 |
24 |
dgisselq |
& Jump to Subroutine. Note the required cleanup instruction after
|
763 |
36 |
dgisselq |
returning. This could easily be turned into a three instruction
|
764 |
|
|
operand, removing the preliminary stack instruction before and
|
765 |
|
|
the cleanup after, by adjusting how any stack frame was built for
|
766 |
|
|
this routine to include space at the top of the stack for the PC.
|
767 |
39 |
dgisselq |
Note also that jumping to a subroutine costs a copy register, {\tt R0}
|
768 |
|
|
in this case.
|
769 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\\\hline
|
770 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt JSR PC+\$Addr }
|
771 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt MOV \$3+PC,R12 \\ MOV \$addr+PC,PC}
|
772 |
21 |
dgisselq |
&This is the high speed
|
773 |
|
|
version of a subroutine call, necessitating a register to hold the
|
774 |
|
|
last PC address. In its favor, this method doesn't suffer the
|
775 |
|
|
mandatory memory access of the other approach. \\\hline
|
776 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LDI.l \$val,Rx }
|
777 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.8in}{\tt LDIHI (\$val$>>$16)\&0x0ffff, Rx \\
|
778 |
|
|
LDILO (\$val\&0x0ffff),Rx}
|
779 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Sadly, there's not enough instruction
|
780 |
|
|
space to load a complete immediate value into any register.
|
781 |
|
|
Therefore, fully loading any register takes two cycles.
|
782 |
|
|
The LDIHI (load immediate high) and LDILO (load immediate low)
|
783 |
|
|
instructions have been created to facilitate this. \\\hline
|
784 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
785 |
|
|
\caption{Derived Instructions}\label{tbl:derived-1}
|
786 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
787 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
788 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{p{1.4in}p{1.5in}p{3in}}\\\hline
|
789 |
|
|
Mapped & Actual & Notes \\\hline
|
790 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt LOD.b \$addr,Rx}
|
791 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt %
|
792 |
21 |
dgisselq |
LDI \$addr,Ra \\
|
793 |
|
|
LDI \$addr,Rb \\
|
794 |
|
|
LSR \$2,Ra \\
|
795 |
|
|
AND \$3,Rb \\
|
796 |
|
|
LOD (Ra),Rx \\
|
797 |
|
|
LSL \$3,Rb \\
|
798 |
|
|
SUB \$32,Rb \\
|
799 |
|
|
ROL Rb,Rx \\
|
800 |
|
|
AND \$0ffh,Rx}
|
801 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{3in}{This CPU is designed for 32'bit word
|
802 |
|
|
length instructions. Byte addressing is not supported by the CPU or
|
803 |
|
|
the bus, so it therefore takes more work to do.
|
804 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
Note also that in this example, \$Addr is a byte-wise address, where
|
806 |
24 |
dgisselq |
all other addresses in this document are 32-bit wordlength addresses.
|
807 |
|
|
For this reason,
|
808 |
21 |
dgisselq |
we needed to drop the bottom two bits. This also limits the address
|
809 |
|
|
space of character accesses using this method from 16 MB down to 4MB.}
|
810 |
|
|
\\\hline
|
811 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LSL \$1,Rx\\ LSLC \$1,Ry}
|
812 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LSL \$1,Ry \\
|
813 |
21 |
dgisselq |
LSL \$1,Rx \\
|
814 |
|
|
OR.C \$1,Ry}
|
815 |
|
|
& Logical shift left with carry. Note that the
|
816 |
|
|
instruction order is now backwards, to keep the conditions valid.
|
817 |
33 |
dgisselq |
That is, LSL sets the carry flag, so if we did this the other way
|
818 |
21 |
dgisselq |
with Rx before Ry, then the condition flag wouldn't have been right
|
819 |
|
|
for an OR correction at the end. \\\hline
|
820 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LSR \$1,Rx \\ LSRC \$1,Ry}
|
821 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt CLR Rz \\
|
822 |
21 |
dgisselq |
LSR \$1,Ry \\
|
823 |
|
|
LDIHI.C \$8000h,Rz \\
|
824 |
|
|
LSR \$1,Rx \\
|
825 |
|
|
OR Rz,Rx}
|
826 |
|
|
& Logical shift right with carry \\\hline
|
827 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt NEG Rx} & \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt XOR \$-1,Rx \\ ADD \$1,Rx} & \\\hline
|
828 |
|
|
{\tt NEG.C Rx} & \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt MOV.C \$-1+Rx,Rx\\XOR.C \$-1,Rx} & \\\hline
|
829 |
|
|
{\tt NOOP} & {\tt NOOP} & While there are many
|
830 |
21 |
dgisselq |
operations that do nothing, such as MOV Rx,Rx, or OR \$0,Rx, these
|
831 |
|
|
operations have consequences in that they might stall the bus if
|
832 |
|
|
Rx isn't ready yet. For this reason, we have a dedicated NOOP
|
833 |
|
|
instruction. \\\hline
|
834 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt NOT Rx } & {\tt XOR \$-1,Rx } & \\\hline
|
835 |
|
|
{\tt POP Rx }
|
836 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LOD \$1(SP),Rx \\ ADD \$1,SP}
|
837 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Note
|
838 |
|
|
that for interrupt purposes, one can never depend upon the value at
|
839 |
|
|
(SP). Hence you read from it, then increment it, lest having
|
840 |
33 |
dgisselq |
incremented it first something then comes along and writes to that
|
841 |
21 |
dgisselq |
value before you can read the result. \\\hline
|
842 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\end{tabular}
|
843 |
|
|
\caption{Derived Instructions, continued}\label{tbl:derived-2}
|
844 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
845 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
846 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{p{1.4in}p{1.5in}p{3in}}\\\hline
|
847 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt PUSH Rx}
|
848 |
33 |
dgisselq |
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{SUB \$1,SP \\
|
849 |
21 |
dgisselq |
STO Rx,\$1(SP)}
|
850 |
39 |
dgisselq |
& Note that for pipelined operation, it helps to coalesce all the
|
851 |
|
|
{\tt SUB}'s into one command, and place the {\tt STO}'s right
|
852 |
|
|
after each other.\\\hline
|
853 |
|
|
{\tt PUSH Rx-Ry}
|
854 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt SUB \$n,SP \\
|
855 |
36 |
dgisselq |
STO Rx,\$n(SP)
|
856 |
|
|
\ldots \\
|
857 |
|
|
STO Ry,\$1(SP)}
|
858 |
|
|
& Multiple pushes at once only need the single subtract from the
|
859 |
|
|
stack pointer. This derived instruction is analogous to a similar one
|
860 |
|
|
on the Motoroloa 68k architecture, although the Zip Assembler
|
861 |
39 |
dgisselq |
does not support this instruction (yet). This instruction
|
862 |
|
|
also supports pipelined memory access.\\\hline
|
863 |
|
|
{\tt RESET}
|
864 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1in}{\tt STO \$1,\$watchdog(R12)\\NOOP\\NOOP}
|
865 |
|
|
& This depends upon the peripheral base address being
|
866 |
21 |
dgisselq |
in R12.
|
867 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
Another opportunity might be to jump to the reset address from within
|
869 |
39 |
dgisselq |
supervisor mode.\\\hline
|
870 |
|
|
{\tt RET} & \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LOD \$1(SP),PC}
|
871 |
24 |
dgisselq |
& Note that this depends upon the calling context to clean up the
|
872 |
|
|
stack, as outlined for the JSR instruction. \\\hline
|
873 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt RET} & {\tt MOV R12,PC}
|
874 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& This is the high(er) speed version, that doesn't touch the stack.
|
875 |
|
|
As such, it doesn't suffer a stall on memory read/write to the stack.
|
876 |
|
|
\\\hline
|
877 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt STEP Rr,Rt}
|
878 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LSR \$1,Rr \\ XOR.C Rt,Rr}
|
879 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Step a Galois implementation of a Linear Feedback Shift Register, Rr,
|
880 |
|
|
using taps Rt \\\hline
|
881 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt STO.b Rx,\$addr}
|
882 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt %
|
883 |
21 |
dgisselq |
LDI \$addr,Ra \\
|
884 |
|
|
LDI \$addr,Rb \\
|
885 |
|
|
LSR \$2,Ra \\
|
886 |
|
|
AND \$3,Rb \\
|
887 |
|
|
SUB \$32,Rb \\
|
888 |
|
|
LOD (Ra),Ry \\
|
889 |
|
|
AND \$0ffh,Rx \\
|
890 |
39 |
dgisselq |
AND \~\$0ffh,Ry \\
|
891 |
21 |
dgisselq |
ROL Rb,Rx \\
|
892 |
|
|
OR Rx,Ry \\
|
893 |
|
|
STO Ry,(Ra) }
|
894 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{3in}{This CPU and it's bus are {\em not} optimized
|
895 |
|
|
for byte-wise operations.
|
896 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
Note that in this example, \$addr is a
|
898 |
|
|
byte-wise address, whereas in all of our other examples it is a
|
899 |
|
|
32-bit word address. This also limits the address space
|
900 |
|
|
of character accesses from 16 MB down to 4MB.F
|
901 |
|
|
Further, this instruction implies a byte ordering,
|
902 |
|
|
such as big or little endian.} \\\hline
|
903 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt SWAP Rx,Ry }
|
904 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt
|
905 |
21 |
dgisselq |
XOR Ry,Rx \\
|
906 |
|
|
XOR Rx,Ry \\
|
907 |
|
|
XOR Ry,Rx}
|
908 |
|
|
& While no extra registers are needed, this example
|
909 |
|
|
does take 3-clocks. \\\hline
|
910 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt TRAP \#X}
|
911 |
|
|
& \parbox[t]{1.5in}{\tt LDI \$x,R0 \\ AND \~\$GIE,CC }
|
912 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& This works because whenever a user lowers the \$GIE flag, it sets
|
913 |
|
|
a TRAP bit within the CC register. Therefore, upon entering the
|
914 |
|
|
supervisor state, the CPU only need check this bit to know that it
|
915 |
|
|
got there via a TRAP. The trap could be made conditional by making
|
916 |
|
|
the LDI and the AND conditional. In that case, the assembler would
|
917 |
|
|
quietly turn the LDI instruction into an LDILO and LDIHI pair,
|
918 |
37 |
dgisselq |
but the effect would be the same. \\\hline
|
919 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\end{tabular}
|
920 |
|
|
\caption{Derived Instructions, continued}\label{tbl:derived-3}
|
921 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
922 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
923 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{p{1.4in}p{1.5in}p{3in}}\\\hline
|
924 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt TST Rx}
|
925 |
|
|
& {\tt TST \$-1,Rx}
|
926 |
21 |
dgisselq |
& Set the condition codes based upon Rx. Could also do a CMP \$0,Rx,
|
927 |
|
|
ADD \$0,Rx, SUB \$0,Rx, etc, AND \$-1,Rx, etc. The TST and CMP
|
928 |
|
|
approaches won't stall future pipeline stages looking for the value
|
929 |
|
|
of Rx. \\\hline
|
930 |
39 |
dgisselq |
{\tt WAIT}
|
931 |
|
|
& {\tt Or \$GIE | \$SLEEP,CC}
|
932 |
|
|
& Wait until the next interrupt, then jump to supervisor/interrupt
|
933 |
|
|
mode.
|
934 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{tabular}
|
935 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\caption{Derived Instructions, continued}\label{tbl:derived-4}
|
936 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{center}\end{table}
|
937 |
|
|
\section{Pipeline Stages}
|
938 |
32 |
dgisselq |
As mentioned in the introduction, and highlighted in Fig.~\ref{fig:cpu},
|
939 |
|
|
the Zip CPU supports a five stage pipeline.
|
940 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\begin{enumerate}
|
941 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf Prefetch}: Reads instruction from memory and into a cache, if so
|
942 |
|
|
configured. This
|
943 |
21 |
dgisselq |
stage is actually pipelined itself, and so it will stall if the PC
|
944 |
|
|
ever changes. Stalls are also created here if the instruction isn't
|
945 |
|
|
in the prefetch cache.
|
946 |
36 |
dgisselq |
|
947 |
|
|
The Zip CPU supports one of two prefetch methods, depending upon a flag
|
948 |
|
|
set at build time within the {\tt zipcpu.v} file. The simplest is a
|
949 |
|
|
non--cached implementation of a prefetch. This implementation is
|
950 |
|
|
fairly small, and ideal for
|
951 |
|
|
users of the Zip CPU who need the extra space on the FPGA fabric.
|
952 |
|
|
However, because this non--cached version has no cache, the maximum
|
953 |
|
|
number of instructions per clock is limited to about one per five.
|
954 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
The second prefetch module is a pipelined prefetch with a cache. This
|
956 |
|
|
module tries to keep the instruction address within a window of valid
|
957 |
|
|
instruction addresses. While effective, it is not a traditional
|
958 |
|
|
cache implementation. One unique feature of this cache implementation,
|
959 |
|
|
however, is that it can be cleared in a single clock. A disappointing
|
960 |
|
|
feature, though, was that it needs an extra internal pipeline stage
|
961 |
|
|
to be implemented.
|
962 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
\item {\bf Decode}: Decodes an instruction into op code, register(s) to read,
|
964 |
|
|
and immediate offset. This stage also determines whether the flags will
|
965 |
32 |
dgisselq |
be set or whether the result will be written back.
|
966 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf Read Operands}: Read registers and apply any immediate values to
|
967 |
24 |
dgisselq |
them. There is no means of detecting or flagging arithmetic overflow
|
968 |
|
|
or carry when adding the immediate to the operand. This stage will
|
969 |
|
|
stall if any source operand is pending.
|
970 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\item Split into two tracks: An {\bf ALU} which will accomplish a simple
|
971 |
36 |
dgisselq |
instruction, and the {\bf MemOps} stage which handles {\tt LOD} (load)
|
972 |
|
|
and {\tt STO} (store) instructions.
|
973 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\begin{itemize}
|
974 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item Loads will stall the entire pipeline until complete.
|
975 |
|
|
\item Condition codes are available upon completion of the ALU stage
|
976 |
|
|
\item Issuing an instruction to the memory unit while the memory unit
|
977 |
|
|
is busy will stall the entire pipeline. If the bus deadlocks,
|
978 |
|
|
only a reset will release the CPU. (Watchdog timer, anyone?)
|
979 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\item The Zip CPU currently has no means of reading and acting on any
|
980 |
|
|
error conditions on the bus.
|
981 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{itemize}
|
982 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item {\bf Write-Back}: Conditionally write back the result to the register
|
983 |
36 |
dgisselq |
set, applying the condition. This routine is bi-entrant: either the
|
984 |
21 |
dgisselq |
memory or the simple instruction may request a register write.
|
985 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
986 |
|
|
|
987 |
24 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU does not support out of order execution. Therefore, if the memory
|
988 |
|
|
unit stalls, every other instruction stalls. Memory stores, however, can take
|
989 |
36 |
dgisselq |
place concurrently with ALU operations, although memory reads (loads) cannot.
|
990 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
991 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\section{Pipeline Stalls}
|
992 |
|
|
The processing pipeline can and will stall for a variety of reasons. Some of
|
993 |
|
|
these are obvious, some less so. These reasons are listed below:
|
994 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
995 |
|
|
\item When the prefetch cache is exhausted
|
996 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
997 |
36 |
dgisselq |
This reason should be obvious. If the prefetch cache doesn't have the
|
998 |
|
|
instruction in memory, the entire pipeline must stall until enough of the
|
999 |
|
|
prefetch cache is loaded to support the next instruction.
|
1000 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
1001 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item While waiting for the pipeline to load following any taken branch, jump,
|
1002 |
36 |
dgisselq |
return from interrupt or switch to interrupt context (5 stall cycles)
|
1003 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
1004 |
|
|
If the PC suddenly changes, the pipeline is subsequently cleared and needs to
|
1005 |
|
|
be reloaded. Given that there are five stages to the pipeline, that accounts
|
1006 |
36 |
dgisselq |
for four of the five stalls. The stall cycle is lost in the pipelined prefetch
|
1007 |
32 |
dgisselq |
stage which needs at least one clock with a valid PC before it can produce
|
1008 |
36 |
dgisselq |
a new output.
|
1009 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
1010 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU handles {\tt MOV \$X(PC),PC}, {\tt ADD \$X,PC}, and
|
1011 |
|
|
{\tt LDI \$X,PC} instructions specially, however. These instructions, when
|
1012 |
|
|
not conditioned on the flags, can execute with only 3~stall cycles.
|
1013 |
|
|
|
1014 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item When reading from a prior register while also adding an immediate offset
|
1015 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1016 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt OPCODE ?,RA}
|
1017 |
|
|
\item\ {\em (stall)}
|
1018 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt OPCODE I+RA,RB}
|
1019 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1020 |
|
|
|
1021 |
|
|
Since the addition of the immediate register within OpB decoding gets applied
|
1022 |
|
|
during the read operand stage so that it can be nicely settled before the ALU,
|
1023 |
|
|
any instruction that will write back an operand must be separated from the
|
1024 |
|
|
opcode that will read and apply an immediate offset by one instruction. The
|
1025 |
|
|
good news is that this stall can easily be mitigated by proper scheduling.
|
1026 |
36 |
dgisselq |
That is, any instruction that does not add an immediate to {\tt RA} may be
|
1027 |
|
|
scheduled into the stall slot.
|
1028 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
1029 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item When any write to either the CC or PC Register is followed by a memory
|
1030 |
|
|
operation
|
1031 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\begin{enumerate}
|
1032 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt OPCODE RA,PC} {\em Ex: a branch opcode}
|
1033 |
|
|
\item\ {\em (stall, even if jump not taken)}
|
1034 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\tt LOD \$X(RA),RB}
|
1035 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\end{enumerate}
|
1036 |
|
|
Since branches take place in the writeback stage, the Zip CPU will stall the
|
1037 |
|
|
pipeline for one clock anytime there may be a possible jump. This prevents
|
1038 |
|
|
an instruction from executing a memory access after the jump but before the
|
1039 |
|
|
jump is recognized.
|
1040 |
|
|
|
1041 |
36 |
dgisselq |
This stall may be mitigated by shuffling the operations immediately following
|
1042 |
|
|
a potential branch so that an ALU operation follows the branch instead of a
|
1043 |
|
|
memory operation.
|
1044 |
33 |
dgisselq |
|
1045 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item When reading from the CC register after setting the flags
|
1046 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1047 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\tt ALUOP RA,RB} {\em Ex: a compare opcode}
|
1048 |
|
|
\item\ {\em (stall)}
|
1049 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\tt TST sys.ccv,CC}
|
1050 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt BZ somewhere}
|
1051 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1052 |
|
|
|
1053 |
|
|
The reason for this stall is simply performance. Many of the flags are
|
1054 |
|
|
determined via combinatorial logic after the writeback instruction is
|
1055 |
|
|
determined. Trying to then place these into the input for one of the operands
|
1056 |
|
|
created a time delay loop that would no longer execute in a single 100~MHz
|
1057 |
|
|
clock cycle. (The time delay of the multiply within the ALU wasn't helping
|
1058 |
|
|
either \ldots).
|
1059 |
|
|
|
1060 |
33 |
dgisselq |
This stall may be eliminated via proper scheduling, by placing an instruction
|
1061 |
|
|
that does not set flags in between the ALU operation and the instruction
|
1062 |
|
|
that references the CC register. For example, {\tt MOV \$addr+PC,uPC}
|
1063 |
|
|
followed by an {\tt RTU} ({\tt OR \$GIE,CC}) instruction will not incur
|
1064 |
|
|
this stall, whereas an {\tt OR \$BREAKEN,CC} followed by an {\tt OR \$STEP,CC}
|
1065 |
36 |
dgisselq |
will incur the stall, while a {\tt LDI \$BREAKEN|\$STEP,CC} will not.
|
1066 |
33 |
dgisselq |
|
1067 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item When waiting for a memory read operation to complete
|
1068 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1069 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt LOD address,RA}
|
1070 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\em (multiple stalls, bus dependent, 4 clocks best)}
|
1071 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\tt OPCODE I+RA,RB}
|
1072 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1073 |
|
|
|
1074 |
36 |
dgisselq |
Remember, the Zip CPU does not support out of order execution. Therefore,
|
1075 |
32 |
dgisselq |
anytime the memory unit becomes busy both the memory unit and the ALU must
|
1076 |
|
|
stall until the memory unit is cleared. This is especially true of a load
|
1077 |
33 |
dgisselq |
instruction, which must still write its operand back to the register file.
|
1078 |
|
|
Store instructions are different, since they can be busy with no impact on
|
1079 |
|
|
later ALU write back operations. Hence, only loads stall the pipeline.
|
1080 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
1081 |
|
|
This also assumes that the memory being accessed is a single cycle memory.
|
1082 |
|
|
Slower memories, such as the Quad SPI flash, will take longer--perhaps even
|
1083 |
33 |
dgisselq |
as long as forty clocks. During this time the CPU and the external bus
|
1084 |
32 |
dgisselq |
will be busy, and unable to do anything else.
|
1085 |
|
|
|
1086 |
|
|
\item Memory operation followed by a memory operation
|
1087 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1088 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt STO address,RA}
|
1089 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\em (multiple stalls, bus dependent, 4 clocks best)}
|
1090 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\tt LOD address,RB}
|
1091 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item\ {\em (multiple stalls, bus dependent, 4 clocks best)}
|
1092 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\end{enumerate}
|
1093 |
|
|
|
1094 |
36 |
dgisselq |
In this case, the LOD instruction cannot start until the STO is finished.
|
1095 |
32 |
dgisselq |
With proper scheduling, it is possible to do something in the ALU while the
|
1096 |
36 |
dgisselq |
memory unit is busy with the STO instruction, but otherwise this pipeline will
|
1097 |
|
|
stall waiting for it to complete.
|
1098 |
32 |
dgisselq |
|
1099 |
39 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU does have the capability of supporting pipelined memory access,
|
1100 |
|
|
but only under the following conditions: all accesses within the pipeline
|
1101 |
|
|
must all be reads or all be writes, all must use the same register for their
|
1102 |
|
|
address, and there can be no stalls or other instructions between pipelined
|
1103 |
|
|
memory access instructions. Further, the offset to memory must be increasing
|
1104 |
|
|
by one address each instruction. These conditions work well for saving or
|
1105 |
|
|
storing registers to the stack.
|
1106 |
36 |
dgisselq |
|
1107 |
|
|
\item When waiting for a conditional memory read operation to complete
|
1108 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1109 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt LOD.Z address,RA}
|
1110 |
|
|
\item\ {\em (multiple stalls, bus dependent, 7 clocks best)}
|
1111 |
|
|
\item\ {\tt OPCODE I+RA,RB}
|
1112 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1113 |
|
|
|
1114 |
|
|
In this case, the Zip CPU doesn't warn the prefetch cache to get off the bus
|
1115 |
|
|
two cycles before using the bus, so there's a potential for an extra three
|
1116 |
|
|
cycle cost due to bus contention between the prefetch and the CPU.
|
1117 |
|
|
|
1118 |
|
|
This is true for both the LOD and the STO instructions, with the exception that
|
1119 |
|
|
the STO instruction will continue in parallel with any ALU instructions that
|
1120 |
|
|
follow it.
|
1121 |
|
|
|
1122 |
32 |
dgisselq |
\end{itemize}
|
1123 |
|
|
|
1124 |
|
|
|
1125 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\chapter{Peripherals}\label{chap:periph}
|
1126 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1127 |
|
|
While the previous chapter describes a CPU in isolation, the Zip System
|
1128 |
|
|
includes a minimum set of peripherals as well. These peripherals are shown
|
1129 |
|
|
in Fig.~\ref{fig:zipsystem}
|
1130 |
|
|
\begin{figure}\begin{center}
|
1131 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{../gfx/system.eps}
|
1132 |
|
|
\caption{Zip System Peripherals}\label{fig:zipsystem}
|
1133 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{figure}
|
1134 |
|
|
and described here. They are designed to make
|
1135 |
|
|
the Zip CPU more useful in an Embedded Operating System environment.
|
1136 |
|
|
|
1137 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Interrupt Controller}
|
1138 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1139 |
|
|
Perhaps the most important peripheral within the Zip System is the interrupt
|
1140 |
|
|
controller. While the Zip CPU itself can only handle one interrupt, and has
|
1141 |
|
|
only the one interrupt state: disabled or enabled, the interrupt controller
|
1142 |
|
|
can make things more interesting.
|
1143 |
|
|
|
1144 |
|
|
The Zip System interrupt controller module supports up to 15 interrupts, all
|
1145 |
|
|
controlled from one register. Bit~31 of the interrupt controller controls
|
1146 |
|
|
overall whether interrupts are enabled (1'b1) or disabled (1'b0). Bits~16--30
|
1147 |
|
|
control whether individual interrupts are enabled (1'b0) or disabled (1'b0).
|
1148 |
|
|
Bit~15 is an indicator showing whether or not any interrupt is active, and
|
1149 |
|
|
bits~0--15 indicate whether or not an individual interrupt is active.
|
1150 |
|
|
|
1151 |
|
|
The interrupt controller has been designed so that bits can be controlled
|
1152 |
|
|
individually without having any knowledge of the rest of the controller
|
1153 |
|
|
setting. To enable an interrupt, write to the register with the high order
|
1154 |
|
|
global enable bit set and the respective interrupt enable bit set. No other
|
1155 |
|
|
bits will be affected. To disable an interrupt, write to the register with
|
1156 |
|
|
the high order global enable bit cleared and the respective interrupt enable
|
1157 |
|
|
bit set. To clear an interrupt, write a `1' to that interrupts status pin.
|
1158 |
|
|
Zero's written to the register have no affect, save that a zero written to the
|
1159 |
|
|
master enable will disable all interrupts.
|
1160 |
|
|
|
1161 |
|
|
As an example, suppose you wished to enable interrupt \#4. You would then
|
1162 |
|
|
write to the register a {\tt 0x80100010} to enable interrupt \#4 and to clear
|
1163 |
|
|
any past active state. When you later wish to disable this interrupt, you would
|
1164 |
|
|
write a {\tt 0x00100010} to the register. As before, this both disables the
|
1165 |
|
|
interrupt and clears the active indicator. This also has the side effect of
|
1166 |
|
|
disabling all interrupts, so a second write of {\tt 0x80000000} may be necessary
|
1167 |
|
|
to re-enable any other interrupts.
|
1168 |
|
|
|
1169 |
|
|
The Zip System currently hosts two interrupt controllers, a primary and a
|
1170 |
|
|
secondary. The primary interrupt controller has one interrupt line which may
|
1171 |
|
|
come from an external interrupt controller, and one interrupt line from the
|
1172 |
|
|
secondary controller. Other primary interrupts include the system timers,
|
1173 |
|
|
the jiffies interrupt, and the manual cache interrupt. The secondary interrupt
|
1174 |
|
|
controller maintains an interrupt state for all of the processor accounting
|
1175 |
|
|
counters.
|
1176 |
|
|
|
1177 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\section{Counter}
|
1178 |
|
|
|
1179 |
|
|
The Zip Counter is a very simple counter: it just counts. It cannot be
|
1180 |
|
|
halted. When it rolls over, it issues an interrupt. Writing a value to the
|
1181 |
|
|
counter just sets the current value, and it starts counting again from that
|
1182 |
|
|
value.
|
1183 |
|
|
|
1184 |
|
|
Eight counters are implemented in the Zip System for process accounting.
|
1185 |
|
|
This may change in the future, as nothing as yet uses these counters.
|
1186 |
|
|
|
1187 |
|
|
\section{Timer}
|
1188 |
|
|
|
1189 |
|
|
The Zip Timer is also very simple: it simply counts down to zero. When it
|
1190 |
|
|
transitions from a one to a zero it creates an interrupt.
|
1191 |
|
|
|
1192 |
|
|
Writing any non-zero value to the timer starts the timer. If the high order
|
1193 |
|
|
bit is set when writing to the timer, the timer becomes an interval timer and
|
1194 |
|
|
reloads its last start time on any interrupt. Hence, to mark seconds, one
|
1195 |
|
|
might set the timer to 100~million (the number of clocks per second), and
|
1196 |
|
|
set the high bit. Ever after, the timer will interrupt the CPU once per
|
1197 |
24 |
dgisselq |
second (assuming a 100~MHz clock). This reload capability also limits the
|
1198 |
|
|
maximum timer value to $2^{31}-1$, rather than $2^{32}-1$.
|
1199 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
1200 |
|
|
\section{Watchdog Timer}
|
1201 |
|
|
|
1202 |
|
|
The watchdog timer is no different from any of the other timers, save for one
|
1203 |
|
|
critical difference: the interrupt line from the watchdog
|
1204 |
|
|
timer is tied to the reset line of the CPU. Hence writing a `1' to the
|
1205 |
|
|
watchdog timer will always reset the CPU.
|
1206 |
32 |
dgisselq |
To stop the Watchdog timer, write a `0' to it. To start it,
|
1207 |
21 |
dgisselq |
write any other number to it---as with the other timers.
|
1208 |
|
|
|
1209 |
|
|
While the watchdog timer supports interval mode, it doesn't make as much sense
|
1210 |
|
|
as it did with the other timers.
|
1211 |
|
|
|
1212 |
|
|
\section{Jiffies}
|
1213 |
|
|
|
1214 |
|
|
This peripheral is motivated by the Linux use of `jiffies' whereby a process
|
1215 |
|
|
can request to be put to sleep until a certain number of `jiffies' have
|
1216 |
|
|
elapsed. Using this interface, the CPU can read the number of `jiffies'
|
1217 |
|
|
from the peripheral (it only has the one location in address space), add the
|
1218 |
24 |
dgisselq |
sleep length to it, and write the result back to the peripheral. The zipjiffies
|
1219 |
21 |
dgisselq |
peripheral will record the value written to it only if it is nearer the current
|
1220 |
|
|
counter value than the last current waiting interrupt time. If no other
|
1221 |
|
|
interrupts are waiting, and this time is in the future, it will be enabled.
|
1222 |
|
|
(There is currently no way to disable a jiffie interrupt once set, other
|
1223 |
24 |
dgisselq |
than to disable the interrupt line in the interrupt controller.) The processor
|
1224 |
21 |
dgisselq |
may then place this sleep request into a list among other sleep requests.
|
1225 |
|
|
Once the timer expires, it would write the next Jiffy request to the peripheral
|
1226 |
|
|
and wake up the process whose timer had expired.
|
1227 |
|
|
|
1228 |
|
|
Indeed, the Jiffies register is nothing more than a glorified counter with
|
1229 |
|
|
an interrupt. Unlike the other counters, the Jiffies register cannot be set.
|
1230 |
|
|
Writes to the jiffies register create an interrupt time. When the Jiffies
|
1231 |
|
|
register later equals the value written to it, an interrupt will be asserted
|
1232 |
|
|
and the register then continues counting as though no interrupt had taken
|
1233 |
|
|
place.
|
1234 |
|
|
|
1235 |
|
|
The purpose of this register is to support alarm times within a CPU. To
|
1236 |
|
|
set an alarm for a particular process $N$ clocks in advance, read the current
|
1237 |
|
|
Jiffies value, and $N$, and write it back to the Jiffies register. The
|
1238 |
|
|
O/S must also keep track of values written to the Jiffies register. Thus,
|
1239 |
32 |
dgisselq |
when an `alarm' trips, it should be removed from the list of alarms, the list
|
1240 |
21 |
dgisselq |
should be sorted, and the next alarm in terms of Jiffies should be written
|
1241 |
|
|
to the register.
|
1242 |
|
|
|
1243 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\section{Direct Memory Access Controller}
|
1244 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1245 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The Direct Memory Access (DMA) controller can be used to either move memory
|
1246 |
|
|
from one location to another, to read from a peripheral into memory, or to
|
1247 |
|
|
write from a peripheral into memory all without CPU intervention. Further,
|
1248 |
|
|
since the DMA controller can issue (and does issue) pipeline wishbone accesses,
|
1249 |
|
|
any DMA memory move will by nature be faster than a corresponding program
|
1250 |
|
|
accomplishing the same move. To put this to numbers, it may take a program
|
1251 |
|
|
18~clocks per word transferred, whereas this DMA controller can move one
|
1252 |
|
|
word in two clocks--provided it has bus access. (The CPU gets priority over the
|
1253 |
|
|
bus.)
|
1254 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1255 |
36 |
dgisselq |
When copying memory from one location to another, the DMA controller will
|
1256 |
|
|
copy in units of a given transfer length--up to 1024 words at a time. It will
|
1257 |
|
|
read that transfer length into its internal buffer, and then write to the
|
1258 |
|
|
destination address from that buffer. If the CPU interrupts a DMA transfer,
|
1259 |
|
|
it will release the bus, let the CPU complete whatever it needs to do, and then
|
1260 |
|
|
restart its transfer by writing the contents of its internal buffer and then
|
1261 |
|
|
re-entering its read cycle again.
|
1262 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1263 |
36 |
dgisselq |
When coupled with a peripheral, the DMA controller can be configured to start
|
1264 |
|
|
a memory copy on an interrupt line going high. Further, the controller can be
|
1265 |
39 |
dgisselq |
configured to issue reads from (or to) the same address instead of incrementing
|
1266 |
36 |
dgisselq |
the address at each clock. The DMA completes once the total number of items
|
1267 |
|
|
specified (not the transfer length) have been transferred.
|
1268 |
|
|
|
1269 |
|
|
In each case, once the transfer is complete and the DMA unit returns to
|
1270 |
|
|
idle, the DMA will issue an interrupt.
|
1271 |
|
|
|
1272 |
|
|
|
1273 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\chapter{Operation}\label{chap:ops}
|
1274 |
|
|
|
1275 |
33 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU, and even the Zip System, is not a System on a Chip (SoC). It
|
1276 |
|
|
needs to be connected to its operational environment in order to be used.
|
1277 |
|
|
Specifically, some per system adjustments need to be made:
|
1278 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1279 |
|
|
\item The Zip System depends upon an external 32-bit Wishbone bus. This
|
1280 |
|
|
must exist, and must be connected to the Zip CPU for it to work.
|
1281 |
|
|
\item The Zip System needs to be told of its {\tt RESET\_ADDRESS}. This is
|
1282 |
|
|
the program counter of the first instruction following a reset.
|
1283 |
|
|
\item If you want the Zip System to start up on its own, you will need to
|
1284 |
|
|
set the {\tt START\_HALTED} parameter to zero. Otherwise, if you
|
1285 |
|
|
wish to manually start the CPU, that is if upon reset you want the
|
1286 |
|
|
CPU start start in its halted, reset state, then set this parameter to
|
1287 |
|
|
one.
|
1288 |
|
|
\item The third parameter to set is the number of interrupts you will be
|
1289 |
|
|
providing from external to the CPU. This can be anything from one
|
1290 |
|
|
to nine, but it cannot be zero. (Wire this line to a 1'b0 if you
|
1291 |
|
|
do not wish to support any external interrupts.)
|
1292 |
|
|
\item Finally, you need to place into some wishbone accessible address, whether
|
1293 |
|
|
RAM or (more likely) ROM, the initial instructions for the CPU.
|
1294 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1295 |
|
|
If you have enabled your CPU to start automatically, then upon power up the
|
1296 |
|
|
CPU will immediately start executing your instructions.
|
1297 |
|
|
|
1298 |
|
|
This is, however, not how I have used the Zip CPU. I have instead used the
|
1299 |
36 |
dgisselq |
Zip CPU in a more controlled environment. For me, the CPU starts in a
|
1300 |
33 |
dgisselq |
halted state, and waits to be told to start. Further, the RESET address is a
|
1301 |
|
|
location in RAM. After bringing up the board I am using, and further the
|
1302 |
|
|
bus that is on it, the RAM memory is then loaded externally with the program
|
1303 |
|
|
I wish the Zip System to run. Once the RAM is loaded, I release the CPU.
|
1304 |
|
|
The CPU then runs until its halt condition, at which point its task is
|
1305 |
|
|
complete.
|
1306 |
|
|
|
1307 |
|
|
Eventually, I intend to place an operating system onto the ZipSystem, I'm
|
1308 |
|
|
just not there yet.
|
1309 |
|
|
|
1310 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The rest of this chapter examines some common programming constructs, and
|
1311 |
|
|
how they might be applied to the Zip System.
|
1312 |
33 |
dgisselq |
|
1313 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\section{Example: Idle Task}
|
1314 |
|
|
One task every operating system needs is the idle task, the task that takes
|
1315 |
|
|
place when nothing else can run. On the Zip CPU, this task is quite simple,
|
1316 |
|
|
and it is shown in assemble in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:idle-asm}.
|
1317 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1318 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1319 |
|
|
{\tt idle\_task:} \\
|
1320 |
|
|
& {\em ; Wait for the next interrupt, then switch to supervisor task} \\
|
1321 |
|
|
& {\tt WAIT} \\
|
1322 |
|
|
& {\em ; When we come back, it's because the supervisor wishes to} \\
|
1323 |
|
|
& {\em ; wait for an interrupt again, so go back to the top.} \\
|
1324 |
|
|
& {\tt BRA idle\_task} \\
|
1325 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1326 |
|
|
\caption{Example Idle Loop}\label{tbl:idle-asm}
|
1327 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1328 |
|
|
When this task runs, the CPU will fill up all of the pipeline stages up the
|
1329 |
|
|
ALU. The {\tt WAIT} instruction, upon leaving the ALU, places the CPU into
|
1330 |
|
|
a sleep state where nothing more moves. Sure, there may be some more settling,
|
1331 |
|
|
the pipe cache continue to read until full, other instructions may issue until
|
1332 |
|
|
the pipeline fills, but then everything will stall. Then, once an interrupt
|
1333 |
|
|
takes place, control passes to the supervisor task to handle the interrupt.
|
1334 |
|
|
When control passes back to this task, it will be on the next instruction.
|
1335 |
|
|
Since that next instruction sends us back to the top of the task, the idle
|
1336 |
|
|
task thus does nothing but wait for an interrupt.
|
1337 |
|
|
|
1338 |
|
|
This should be the lowest priority task, the task that runs when nothing else
|
1339 |
|
|
can. It will help lower the FPGA power usage overall---at least its dynamic
|
1340 |
|
|
power usage.
|
1341 |
|
|
|
1342 |
|
|
\section{Example: Memory Copy}
|
1343 |
|
|
One common operation is that of a memory move or copy. Consider the C code
|
1344 |
|
|
shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:memcp-c}.
|
1345 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1346 |
|
|
\parbox{4in}{\begin{tabbing}
|
1347 |
|
|
{\tt void} \= {\tt memcp(void *dest, void *src, int len) \{} \\
|
1348 |
|
|
\> {\tt for(int i=0; i<len; i++)} \\
|
1349 |
|
|
\> \hspace{0.2in} {\tt *dest++ = *src++;} \\
|
1350 |
|
|
\}
|
1351 |
|
|
\end{tabbing}}
|
1352 |
|
|
\caption{Example Memory Copy code in C}\label{tbl:memcp-c}
|
1353 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1354 |
|
|
This same code can be translated in Zip Assembly as shown in
|
1355 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:memcp-asm}.
|
1356 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1357 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1358 |
|
|
memcp: \\
|
1359 |
|
|
& {\em ; R0 = *dest, R1 = *src, R2 = LEN} \\
|
1360 |
|
|
& {\em ; The following will operate in 17 clocks per word minus one clock} \\
|
1361 |
|
|
& {\tt CMP 0,R2} \\
|
1362 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD.Z -1(SP),PC} {\em ; A conditional return }\\
|
1363 |
|
|
& {\em ; (One stall on potentially writing to PC)} \\
|
1364 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD (R1),R3} \\
|
1365 |
|
|
& {\em ; (4 stalls, cannot be scheduled away)} \\
|
1366 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R3,(R2)} {\em ; (4 schedulable stalls, has no impact now)} \\
|
1367 |
|
|
& {\tt ADD 1,R1} \\
|
1368 |
|
|
& {\tt SUB 1,R2} \\
|
1369 |
|
|
& {\tt BNZ loop} \\
|
1370 |
|
|
& {\em ; (5 stalls, if branch taken, to clear and refill the pipeline)} \\
|
1371 |
|
|
& {\tt RET} \\
|
1372 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1373 |
|
|
\caption{Example Memory Copy code in Zip Assembly}\label{tbl:memcp-asm}
|
1374 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1375 |
|
|
This example points out several things associated with the Zip CPU. First,
|
1376 |
|
|
a straightforward implementation of a for loop is not the fastest loop
|
1377 |
|
|
structure. For this reason, we have placed the test to continue at the
|
1378 |
|
|
end. Second, all pointers are {\tt void} pointers to arbitrary 32--bit
|
1379 |
|
|
data types. The Zip CPU does not have explicit support for smaller or larger
|
1380 |
|
|
data types, and so this memory copy cannot be applied at a byte level.
|
1381 |
|
|
Third, we've optimized the conditional jump to a return instruction into a
|
1382 |
|
|
conditional return instruction.
|
1383 |
|
|
|
1384 |
|
|
\section{Context Switch}
|
1385 |
|
|
|
1386 |
|
|
Fundamental to any multiprocessing system is the ability to switch from one
|
1387 |
|
|
task to the next. In the ZipSystem, this is accomplished in one of a couple
|
1388 |
|
|
ways. The first step is that an interrupt happens. Anytime an interrupt
|
1389 |
|
|
happens, the CPU needs to execute the following tasks in supervisor mode:
|
1390 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1391 |
|
|
\item Check for a trap instruction. That is, if the user task requested a
|
1392 |
|
|
trap, we may not wish to adjust the context, check interrupts, or call
|
1393 |
|
|
the scheduler. Tbl.~\ref{tbl:trap-check}
|
1394 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1395 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1396 |
|
|
{\tt return\_to\_user:} \\
|
1397 |
|
|
& {\em; The instruction before the context switch processing must} \\
|
1398 |
|
|
& {\em; be the RTU instruction that enacted user mode in the first} \\
|
1399 |
|
|
& {\em; place. We show it here just for reference.} \\
|
1400 |
|
|
& {\tt RTU} \\
|
1401 |
|
|
{\tt trap\_check:} \\
|
1402 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uCC,R0} \\
|
1403 |
|
|
& {\tt TST \$TRAP,R0} \\
|
1404 |
|
|
& {\tt BNZ swap\_out} \\
|
1405 |
|
|
& {; \em Do something here to execute the trap} \\
|
1406 |
|
|
& {; \em Don't need to call the scheduler, so we can just return} \\
|
1407 |
|
|
& {\tt BRA return\_to\_user} \\
|
1408 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1409 |
|
|
\caption{Checking for whether the user issued a TRAP instruction}\label{tbl:trap-check}
|
1410 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1411 |
|
|
shows the rudiments of this code, while showing nothing of how the
|
1412 |
|
|
actual trap would be implemented.
|
1413 |
|
|
|
1414 |
|
|
You may also wish to note that the instruction before the first instruction
|
1415 |
|
|
in our context swap {\em must be} a return to userspace instruction.
|
1416 |
|
|
Remember, the supervisor process is re--entered where it left off. This is
|
1417 |
|
|
different from many other processors that enter interrupt mode at some vector
|
1418 |
|
|
or other. In this case, we always enter supervisor mode right where we last
|
1419 |
|
|
left.\footnote{The one exception to this rule is upon reset where supervisor
|
1420 |
|
|
mode is entered at a pre--programmed wishbone memory address.}
|
1421 |
|
|
|
1422 |
|
|
\item Capture user counters. If the operating system is keeping track of
|
1423 |
|
|
system usage via the accounting counters, those counters need to be
|
1424 |
|
|
copied and accumulated into some master counter at this point.
|
1425 |
|
|
|
1426 |
|
|
\item Preserve the old context. This involves pushing all the user registers
|
1427 |
|
|
onto the user stack and then copying the resulting stack address
|
1428 |
|
|
into the tasks task structure, as shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:context-out}.
|
1429 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1430 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1431 |
|
|
{\tt swap\_out:} \\
|
1432 |
39 |
dgisselq |
& {\tt MOV -15(uSP),R5} \\
|
1433 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R5,stack(R12)} \\
|
1434 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR0,R0} \\
|
1435 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR1,R1} \\
|
1436 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR2,R2} \\
|
1437 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR3,R3} \\
|
1438 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR4,R4} \\
|
1439 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R0,1(R5)} {\em ; Exploit memory pipelining: }\\
|
1440 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R1,2(R5)} {\em ; All instructions write to stack }\\
|
1441 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R2,3(R5)} {\em ; All offsets increment by one }\\
|
1442 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R3,4(R5)} {\em ; Longest pipeline is 5 cycles.}\\
|
1443 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R4,5(R5)} \\
|
1444 |
|
|
& \ldots {\em ; Need to repeat for all user registers} \\
|
1445 |
|
|
\iffalse
|
1446 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR5,R0} \\
|
1447 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR6,R1} \\
|
1448 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR7,R2} \\
|
1449 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR8,R3} \\
|
1450 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR9,R4} \\
|
1451 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R0,6(R5) }\\
|
1452 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R1,7(R5) }\\
|
1453 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R2,8(R5) }\\
|
1454 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R3,9(R5) }\\
|
1455 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R4,10(R5)} \\
|
1456 |
|
|
\fi
|
1457 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR10,R0} \\
|
1458 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR11,R1} \\
|
1459 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uR12,R2} \\
|
1460 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uCC,R3} \\
|
1461 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV uPC,R4} \\
|
1462 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R0,11(R5)}\\
|
1463 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R1,12(R5)}\\
|
1464 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R2,13(R5)}\\
|
1465 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R3,14(R5)}\\
|
1466 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R4,15(R5)} \\
|
1467 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& {\em ; We can skip storing the stack, uSP, since it'll be stored}\\
|
1468 |
|
|
& {\em ; elsewhere (in the task structure) }\\
|
1469 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1470 |
|
|
\caption{Example Storing User Task Context}\label{tbl:context-out}
|
1471 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1472 |
|
|
For the sake of discussion, we assume the supervisor maintains a
|
1473 |
|
|
pointer to the current task's structure in supervisor register
|
1474 |
|
|
{\tt R12}, and that {\tt stack} is an offset to the beginning of this
|
1475 |
|
|
structure indicating where the stack pointer is to be kept within it.
|
1476 |
|
|
|
1477 |
|
|
For those who are still interested, the full code for this context
|
1478 |
|
|
save can be found as an assembler macro within the assembler
|
1479 |
|
|
include file, {\tt sys.i}.
|
1480 |
|
|
|
1481 |
|
|
\item Reset the watchdog timer. If you are using the watchdog timer, it should
|
1482 |
|
|
be reset on a context swap, to know that things are still working.
|
1483 |
|
|
Example code for this is shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:reset-watchdog}.
|
1484 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1485 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1486 |
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{l}{{\tt `define WATCHDOG\_ADDRESS 32'hc000\_0002}}\\
|
1487 |
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{l}{{\tt `define WATCHDOG\_TICKS 32'd1\_000\_000} {; \em = 10 ms}}\\
|
1488 |
|
|
& {\tt LDI WATCHDOG\_ADDRESS,R0} \\
|
1489 |
|
|
& {\tt LDI WATCHDOG\_TICKS,R1} \\
|
1490 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R1,(R0)}
|
1491 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1492 |
|
|
\caption{Example Watchdog Reset}\label{tbl:reset-watchdog}
|
1493 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1494 |
|
|
|
1495 |
|
|
\item Interrupt handling. An interrupt handler within the Zip System is nothing
|
1496 |
|
|
more than a task. At context swap time, the supervisor needs to
|
1497 |
|
|
disable all of the interrupts that have tripped, and then enable
|
1498 |
|
|
all of the tasks that would deal with each of these interrupts.
|
1499 |
|
|
These can be user tasks, run at higher priority than any other user
|
1500 |
|
|
tasks. Either way, they will need to re--enable their own interrupt
|
1501 |
|
|
themselves, if the interrupt is still relevant.
|
1502 |
|
|
|
1503 |
|
|
An example of this master interrut handling is shown in
|
1504 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:pre-handler}.
|
1505 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1506 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1507 |
|
|
{\tt pre\_handler:} \\
|
1508 |
|
|
& {\tt LDI PIC\_ADDRESS,R0 } \\
|
1509 |
|
|
& {\em ; Start by grabbing the interrupt state from the interrupt}\\
|
1510 |
|
|
& {\em ; controller. We'll store this into the register R7 so that }\\
|
1511 |
|
|
& {\em ; we can keep and preserve this information for the scheduler}\\
|
1512 |
|
|
& {\em ; to use later. }\\
|
1513 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD (R0),R1} \\
|
1514 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R1,R7 } \\
|
1515 |
|
|
& {\em ; As a next step, we need to acknowledge and disable all active}\\
|
1516 |
|
|
& {\em ; interrupts. We'll start by calculating all of our active}\\
|
1517 |
|
|
& {\em ; interrupts.}\\
|
1518 |
|
|
& {\tt AND 0x07fff,R1 } \\
|
1519 |
|
|
& {\em ; Put the active interrupts into the upper half of R1} \\
|
1520 |
|
|
& {\tt ROL 16,R1 } \\
|
1521 |
|
|
& {\tt LDILO 0x0ffff,R1 } \\
|
1522 |
|
|
& {\tt AND R7,R1}\\
|
1523 |
|
|
& {\em ; Acknowledge and disable active interrupts}\\
|
1524 |
|
|
& {\em ; This also disables all interrupts from the controller, so}\\
|
1525 |
|
|
& {\em ; we'll need to re-enable interrupts in general shortly } \\
|
1526 |
|
|
& {\tt STO R1,(R0) } \\
|
1527 |
|
|
& {\em ; We leave our active interrupt mask in R7 so the scheduler can}\\
|
1528 |
|
|
& {\em ; release any tasks that depended upon them. } \\
|
1529 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1530 |
|
|
\caption{Example checking for active interrupts}\label{tbl:pre-handler}
|
1531 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1532 |
|
|
|
1533 |
|
|
\item Calling the scheduler. This needs to be done to pick the next task
|
1534 |
|
|
to switch to. It may be an interrupt handler, or it may be a normal
|
1535 |
|
|
user task. From a priority standpoint, it would make sense that the
|
1536 |
|
|
interrupt handlers all have a higher priority than the user tasks,
|
1537 |
|
|
and that once they have been called the user tasks may then be called
|
1538 |
|
|
again. If no task is ready to run, run the idle task to wait for an
|
1539 |
|
|
interrupt.
|
1540 |
|
|
|
1541 |
|
|
This suggests a minimum of four task priorities:
|
1542 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1543 |
|
|
\item Interrupt handlers, executed with their interrupts disabled
|
1544 |
|
|
\item Device drivers, executed with interrupts re-enabled
|
1545 |
|
|
\item User tasks
|
1546 |
|
|
\item The idle task, executed when nothing else is able to execute
|
1547 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1548 |
|
|
|
1549 |
|
|
For our purposes here, we'll just assume that a pointer to the current
|
1550 |
|
|
task is maintained in {\tt R12}, that a {\tt JSR scheduler} is
|
1551 |
|
|
called, and that the next current task is likewise placed into
|
1552 |
|
|
{\tt R12}.
|
1553 |
|
|
|
1554 |
|
|
\item Restore the new tasks context. Given that the scheduler has returned a
|
1555 |
|
|
task that can be run at this time, the stack pointer needs to be
|
1556 |
|
|
pulled out of the tasks task structure, placed into the user
|
1557 |
|
|
register, and then the rest of the user registers need to be popped
|
1558 |
|
|
back off of the stack to run this task. An example of this is
|
1559 |
|
|
shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:context-in},
|
1560 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1561 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1562 |
|
|
{\tt swap\_in:} \\
|
1563 |
39 |
dgisselq |
& {\tt LOD stack(R12),R5} \\
|
1564 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& {\tt MOV 15(R1),uSP} \\
|
1565 |
39 |
dgisselq |
& {\em ; Be sure to exploit the memory pipelining capability} \\
|
1566 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 1(R5),R0} \\
|
1567 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 2(R5),R1} \\
|
1568 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 3(R5),R2} \\
|
1569 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 4(R5),R3} \\
|
1570 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 5(R5),R4} \\
|
1571 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R0,uR0} \\
|
1572 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R1,uR1} \\
|
1573 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R2,uR2} \\
|
1574 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R3,uR3} \\
|
1575 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R4,uR4} \\
|
1576 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& \ldots {\em ; Need to repeat for all user registers} \\
|
1577 |
39 |
dgisselq |
& {\tt LOD 11(R5),R0} \\
|
1578 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 12(R5),R1} \\
|
1579 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 13(R5),R2} \\
|
1580 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 14(R5),R3} \\
|
1581 |
|
|
& {\tt LOD 15(R5),R4} \\
|
1582 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R0,uR10} \\
|
1583 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R1,uR11} \\
|
1584 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R2,uR12} \\
|
1585 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R3,uCC} \\
|
1586 |
|
|
& {\tt MOV R4,uPC} \\
|
1587 |
|
|
|
1588 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& {\tt BRA return\_to\_user} \\
|
1589 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
1590 |
|
|
\caption{Example Restoring User Task Context}\label{tbl:context-in}
|
1591 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1592 |
|
|
assuming as before that the task
|
1593 |
|
|
pointer is found in supervisor register {\tt R12}.
|
1594 |
|
|
As with storing the user context, the full code associated with
|
1595 |
|
|
restoring the user context can be found in the assembler include
|
1596 |
|
|
file, {\tt sys.i}.
|
1597 |
|
|
|
1598 |
|
|
\item Clear the userspace accounting registers. In order to keep track of
|
1599 |
|
|
per process system usage, these registers need to be cleared before
|
1600 |
|
|
reactivating the userspace process. That way, upon the next
|
1601 |
|
|
interrupt, we'll know how many clocks the userspace program has
|
1602 |
|
|
encountered, and how many instructions it was able to issue in
|
1603 |
|
|
those many clocks.
|
1604 |
|
|
|
1605 |
|
|
\item Jump back to the instruction just before saving the last tasks context,
|
1606 |
|
|
because that location in memory contains the return from interrupt
|
1607 |
|
|
command that we are going to need to execute, in order to guarantee
|
1608 |
|
|
that we return back here again.
|
1609 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1610 |
|
|
|
1611 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\chapter{Registers}\label{chap:regs}
|
1612 |
|
|
|
1613 |
24 |
dgisselq |
The ZipSystem registers fall into two categories, ZipSystem internal registers
|
1614 |
|
|
accessed via the ZipCPU shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:zpregs},
|
1615 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
1616 |
|
|
\begin{center}\begin{reglist}
|
1617 |
32 |
dgisselq |
PIC & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000000} & 32 & R/W & Primary Interrupt Controller \\\hline
|
1618 |
|
|
WDT & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000001} & 32 & R/W & Watchdog Timer \\\hline
|
1619 |
36 |
dgisselq |
& \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000002} & 32 & R/W & {\em (Reserved for future use)} \\\hline
|
1620 |
32 |
dgisselq |
CTRIC & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000003} & 32 & R/W & Secondary Interrupt Controller \\\hline
|
1621 |
|
|
TMRA & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000004} & 32 & R/W & Timer A\\\hline
|
1622 |
|
|
TMRB & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000005} & 32 & R/W & Timer B\\\hline
|
1623 |
|
|
TMRC & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000006} & 32 & R/W & Timer C\\\hline
|
1624 |
|
|
JIFF & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000007} & 32 & R/W & Jiffies \\\hline
|
1625 |
|
|
MTASK & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000008} & 32 & R/W & Master Task Clock Counter \\\hline
|
1626 |
|
|
MMSTL & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000009} & 32 & R/W & Master Stall Counter \\\hline
|
1627 |
|
|
MPSTL & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000a} & 32 & R/W & Master Pre--Fetch Stall Counter \\\hline
|
1628 |
|
|
MICNT & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000b} & 32 & R/W & Master Instruction Counter\\\hline
|
1629 |
|
|
UTASK & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000c} & 32 & R/W & User Task Clock Counter \\\hline
|
1630 |
|
|
UMSTL & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000d} & 32 & R/W & User Stall Counter \\\hline
|
1631 |
|
|
UPSTL & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000e} & 32 & R/W & User Pre--Fetch Stall Counter \\\hline
|
1632 |
|
|
UICNT & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc000000f} & 32 & R/W & User Instruction Counter\\\hline
|
1633 |
36 |
dgisselq |
DMACTRL & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000010} & 32 & R/W & DMA Control Register\\\hline
|
1634 |
|
|
DMALEN & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000011} & 32 & R/W & DMA total transfer length\\\hline
|
1635 |
|
|
DMASRC & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000012} & 32 & R/W & DMA source address\\\hline
|
1636 |
|
|
DMADST & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0000013} & 32 & R/W & DMA destination address\\\hline
|
1637 |
32 |
dgisselq |
% Cache & \scalebox{0.8}{\tt 0xc0100000} & & & Base address of the Cache memory\\\hline
|
1638 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\end{reglist}
|
1639 |
|
|
\caption{Zip System Internal/Peripheral Registers}\label{tbl:zpregs}
|
1640 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1641 |
33 |
dgisselq |
and the two debug registers shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:dbgregs}.
|
1642 |
24 |
dgisselq |
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
1643 |
|
|
\begin{center}\begin{reglist}
|
1644 |
|
|
ZIPCTRL & 0 & 32 & R/W & Debug Control Register \\\hline
|
1645 |
|
|
ZIPDATA & 1 & 32 & R/W & Debug Data Register \\\hline
|
1646 |
|
|
\end{reglist}
|
1647 |
|
|
\caption{Zip System Debug Registers}\label{tbl:dbgregs}
|
1648 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1649 |
|
|
|
1650 |
33 |
dgisselq |
\section{Peripheral Registers}
|
1651 |
|
|
The peripheral registers, listed in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:zpregs}, are shown in the
|
1652 |
|
|
CPU's address space. These may be accessed by the CPU at these addresses,
|
1653 |
|
|
and when so accessed will respond as described in Chapt.~\ref{chap:periph}.
|
1654 |
|
|
These registers will be discussed briefly again here.
|
1655 |
24 |
dgisselq |
|
1656 |
33 |
dgisselq |
The Zip CPU Interrupt controller has four different types of bits, as shown in
|
1657 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:picbits}.
|
1658 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1659 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1660 |
|
|
31 & R/W & Master Interrupt Enable\\\hline
|
1661 |
|
|
30\ldots 16 & R/W & Interrupt Enables, write '1' to change\\\hline
|
1662 |
|
|
15 & R & Current Master Interrupt State\\\hline
|
1663 |
|
|
15\ldots 0 & R/W & Input Interrupt states, write '1' to clear\\\hline
|
1664 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1665 |
|
|
\caption{Interrupt Controller Register Bits}\label{tbl:picbits}
|
1666 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1667 |
|
|
The high order bit, or bit--31, is the master interrupt enable bit. When this
|
1668 |
|
|
bit is set, then any time an interrupt occurs the CPU will be interrupted and
|
1669 |
|
|
will switch to supervisor mode, etc.
|
1670 |
|
|
|
1671 |
|
|
Bits 30~\ldots 16 are interrupt enable bits. Should the interrupt line go
|
1672 |
|
|
ghile while enabled, an interrupt will be generated. To set an interrupt enable
|
1673 |
|
|
bit, one needs to write the master interrupt enable while writing a `1' to this
|
1674 |
|
|
the bit. To clear, one need only write a `0' to the master interrupt enable,
|
1675 |
|
|
while leaving this line high.
|
1676 |
|
|
|
1677 |
|
|
Bits 15\ldots 0 are the current state of the interrupt vector. Interrupt lines
|
1678 |
|
|
trip when they go high, and remain tripped until they are acknowledged. If
|
1679 |
|
|
the interrupt goes high for longer than one pulse, it may be high when a clear
|
1680 |
|
|
is requested. If so, the interrupt will not clear. The line must go low
|
1681 |
|
|
again before the status bit can be cleared.
|
1682 |
|
|
|
1683 |
|
|
As an example, consider the following scenario where the Zip CPU supports four
|
1684 |
|
|
interrupts, 3\ldots0.
|
1685 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
1686 |
|
|
\item The Supervisor will first, while in the interrupts disabled mode,
|
1687 |
|
|
write a {\tt 32'h800f000f} to the controller. The supervisor may then
|
1688 |
|
|
switch to the user state with interrupts enabled.
|
1689 |
|
|
\item When an interrupt occurs, the supervisor will switch to the interrupt
|
1690 |
|
|
state. It will then cycle through the interrupt bits to learn which
|
1691 |
|
|
interrupt handler to call.
|
1692 |
|
|
\item If the interrupt handler expects more interrupts, it will clear its
|
1693 |
|
|
current interrupt when it is done handling the interrupt in question.
|
1694 |
|
|
To do this, it will write a '1' to the low order interrupt mask,
|
1695 |
|
|
such as writing a {\tt 32'h80000001}.
|
1696 |
|
|
\item If the interrupt handler does not expect any more interrupts, it will
|
1697 |
|
|
instead clear the interrupt from the controller by writing a
|
1698 |
|
|
{\tt 32'h00010001} to the controller.
|
1699 |
|
|
\item Once all interrupts have been handled, the supervisor will write a
|
1700 |
|
|
{\tt 32'h80000000} to the interrupt register to re-enable interrupt
|
1701 |
|
|
generation.
|
1702 |
|
|
\item The supervisor should also check the user trap bit, and possible soft
|
1703 |
|
|
interrupt bits here, but this action has nothing to do with the
|
1704 |
|
|
interrupt control register.
|
1705 |
|
|
\item The supervisor will then leave interrupt mode, possibly adjusting
|
1706 |
|
|
whichever task is running, by executing a return from interrupt
|
1707 |
|
|
command.
|
1708 |
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
1709 |
|
|
|
1710 |
|
|
Leaving the interrupt controller, we show the timer registers bit definitions
|
1711 |
|
|
in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:tmrbits}.
|
1712 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1713 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1714 |
|
|
31 & R/W & Auto-Reload\\\hline
|
1715 |
|
|
30\ldots 0 & R/W & Current timer value\\\hline
|
1716 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1717 |
|
|
\caption{Timer Register Bits}\label{tbl:tmrbits}
|
1718 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1719 |
|
|
As you may recall, the timer just counts down to zero and then trips an
|
1720 |
|
|
interrupt. Writing to the current timer value sets that value, and reading
|
1721 |
|
|
from it returns that value. Writing to the current timer value while also
|
1722 |
|
|
setting the auto--reload bit will send the timer into an auto--reload mode.
|
1723 |
|
|
In this mode, upon setting its interrupt bit for one cycle, the timer will
|
1724 |
|
|
also reset itself back to the value of the timer that was written to it when
|
1725 |
|
|
the auto--reload option was written to it. To clear and stop the timer,
|
1726 |
|
|
just simply write a `32'h00' to this register.
|
1727 |
|
|
|
1728 |
|
|
The Jiffies register is somewhat similar in that the register always changes.
|
1729 |
|
|
In this case, the register counts up, whereas the timer always counted down.
|
1730 |
|
|
Reads from this register, as shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:jiffybits},
|
1731 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1732 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1733 |
|
|
31\ldots 0 & R & Current jiffy value\\\hline
|
1734 |
|
|
31\ldots 0 & W & Value/time of next interrupt\\\hline
|
1735 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1736 |
|
|
\caption{Jiffies Register Bits}\label{tbl:jiffybits}
|
1737 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1738 |
|
|
always return the time value contained in the register. Writes greater than
|
1739 |
|
|
the current Jiffy value, that is where the new value minus the old value is
|
1740 |
|
|
greater than zero while ignoring truncation, will set a new Jiffy interrupt
|
1741 |
|
|
time. At that time, the Jiffy vector will clear, and another interrupt time
|
1742 |
|
|
may either be written to it, or it will just continue counting without
|
1743 |
|
|
activating any more interrupts.
|
1744 |
|
|
|
1745 |
|
|
The Zip CPU also supports several counter peripherals, mostly in the way of
|
1746 |
|
|
process accounting. This peripherals have a single register associated with
|
1747 |
|
|
them, shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:ctrbits}.
|
1748 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1749 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1750 |
|
|
31\ldots 0 & R/W & Current counter value\\\hline
|
1751 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1752 |
|
|
\caption{Counter Register Bits}\label{tbl:ctrbits}
|
1753 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1754 |
|
|
Writes to this register set the new counter value. Reads read the current
|
1755 |
|
|
counter value.
|
1756 |
|
|
|
1757 |
|
|
The current design operation of these counters is that of performance counting.
|
1758 |
|
|
Two sets of four registers are available for keeping track of performance.
|
1759 |
|
|
The first is a task counter. This just counts clock ticks. The second
|
1760 |
|
|
counter is a prefetch stall counter, then an master stall counter. These
|
1761 |
|
|
allow the CPU to be evaluated as to how efficient it is. The fourth and
|
1762 |
|
|
final counter is an instruction counter, which counts how many instructions the
|
1763 |
|
|
CPU has issued.
|
1764 |
|
|
|
1765 |
|
|
It is envisioned that these counters will be used as follows: First, every time
|
1766 |
|
|
a master counter rolls over, the supervisor (Operating System) will record
|
1767 |
|
|
the fact. Second, whenever activating a user task, the Operating System will
|
1768 |
|
|
set the four user counters to zero. When the user task has completed, the
|
1769 |
|
|
Operating System will read the timers back off, to determine how much of the
|
1770 |
|
|
CPU the process had consumed.
|
1771 |
|
|
|
1772 |
36 |
dgisselq |
The final peripheral to discuss is the DMA controller. This controller
|
1773 |
|
|
has four registers. Of these four, the length, source and destination address
|
1774 |
|
|
registers should need no further explanation. They are full 32--bit registers
|
1775 |
|
|
specifying the entire transfer length, the starting address to read from, and
|
1776 |
|
|
the starting address to write to. The registers can be written to when the
|
1777 |
|
|
DMA is idle, and read at any time. The control register, however, will need
|
1778 |
|
|
some more explanation.
|
1779 |
|
|
|
1780 |
|
|
The bit allocation of the control register is shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:dmacbits}.
|
1781 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1782 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1783 |
|
|
31 & R & DMA Active\\\hline
|
1784 |
39 |
dgisselq |
30 & R & Wishbone error, transaction aborted. This bit is cleared the next time
|
1785 |
|
|
this register is written to.\\\hline
|
1786 |
36 |
dgisselq |
29 & R/W & Set to '1' to prevent the controller from incrementing the source address, '0' for normal memory copy. \\\hline
|
1787 |
39 |
dgisselq |
28 & R/W & Set to '1' to prevent the controller from incrementing the
|
1788 |
36 |
dgisselq |
destination address, '0' for normal memory copy. \\\hline
|
1789 |
|
|
27 \ldots 16 & W & The DMA Key. Write a 12'hfed to these bits to start the
|
1790 |
|
|
activate any DMA transfer. \\\hline
|
1791 |
|
|
27 & R & Always reads '0', to force the deliberate writing of the key. \\\hline
|
1792 |
|
|
26 \ldots 16 & R & Indicates the number of items in the transfer buffer that
|
1793 |
|
|
have yet to be written. \\\hline
|
1794 |
|
|
15 & R/W & Set to '1' to trigger on an interrupt, or '0' to start immediately
|
1795 |
|
|
upon receiving a valid key.\\\hline
|
1796 |
|
|
14\ldots 10 & R/W & Select among one of 32~possible interrupt lines.\\\hline
|
1797 |
|
|
9\ldots 0 & R/W & Intermediate transfer length minus one. Thus, to transfer
|
1798 |
|
|
one item at a time set this value to 0. To transfer 1024 at a time,
|
1799 |
|
|
set it to 1024.\\\hline
|
1800 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1801 |
|
|
\caption{DMA Control Register Bits}\label{tbl:dmacbits}
|
1802 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1803 |
|
|
This control register has been designed so that the common case of memory
|
1804 |
|
|
access need only set the key and the transfer length. Hence, writing a
|
1805 |
|
|
\hbox{32'h0fed03ff} to the control register will start any memory transfer.
|
1806 |
|
|
On the other hand, if you wished to read from a serial port (constant address)
|
1807 |
|
|
and put the result into a buffer every time a word was available, you
|
1808 |
|
|
might wish to write \hbox{32'h2fed8000}--this assumes, of course, that you
|
1809 |
|
|
have a serial port wired to the zero bit of this interrupt control. (The
|
1810 |
|
|
DMA controller does not use the interrupt controller, and cannot clear
|
1811 |
|
|
interrupts.) As a third example, if you wished to write to an external
|
1812 |
|
|
FIFO anytime it was less than half full (had fewer than 512 items), and
|
1813 |
|
|
interrupt line 2 indicated this condition, you might wish to issue a
|
1814 |
|
|
\hbox{32'h1fed8dff} to this port.
|
1815 |
|
|
|
1816 |
33 |
dgisselq |
\section{Debug Port Registers}
|
1817 |
|
|
Accessing the Zip System via the debug port isn't as straight forward as
|
1818 |
|
|
accessing the system via the wishbone bus. The debug port itself has been
|
1819 |
|
|
reduced to two addresses, as outlined earlier in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:dbgregs}.
|
1820 |
|
|
Access to the Zip System begins with the Debug Control register, shown in
|
1821 |
|
|
Tbl.~\ref{tbl:dbgctrl}.
|
1822 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1823 |
|
|
\begin{bitlist}
|
1824 |
|
|
31\ldots 14 & R & Reserved\\\hline
|
1825 |
|
|
13 & R & CPU GIE setting\\\hline
|
1826 |
|
|
12 & R & CPU is sleeping\\\hline
|
1827 |
|
|
11 & W & Command clear PF cache\\\hline
|
1828 |
|
|
10 & R/W & Command HALT, Set to '1' to halt the CPU\\\hline
|
1829 |
|
|
9 & R & Stall Status, '1' if CPU is busy\\\hline
|
1830 |
36 |
dgisselq |
8 & R/W & Step Command, set to '1' to step the CPU, also sets the halt bit\\\hline
|
1831 |
33 |
dgisselq |
7 & R & Interrupt Request \\\hline
|
1832 |
|
|
6 & R/W & Command RESET \\\hline
|
1833 |
|
|
5\ldots 0 & R/W & Debug Register Address \\\hline
|
1834 |
|
|
\end{bitlist}
|
1835 |
|
|
\caption{Debug Control Register Bits}\label{tbl:dbgctrl}
|
1836 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1837 |
|
|
|
1838 |
|
|
The first step in debugging access is to determine whether or not the CPU
|
1839 |
|
|
is halted, and to halt it if not. To do this, first write a '1' to the
|
1840 |
|
|
Command HALT bit. This will halt the CPU and place it into debug mode.
|
1841 |
|
|
Once the CPU is halted, the stall status bit will drop to zero. Thus,
|
1842 |
|
|
if bit 10 is high and bit 9 low, the debug port is open to examine the
|
1843 |
|
|
internal state of the CPU.
|
1844 |
|
|
|
1845 |
|
|
At this point, the external debugger may examine internal state information
|
1846 |
|
|
from within the CPU. To do this, first write again to the command register
|
1847 |
|
|
a value (with command halt still high) containing the address of an internal
|
1848 |
|
|
register of interest in the bottom 6~bits. Internal registers that may be
|
1849 |
|
|
accessed this way are listed in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:dbgaddrs}.
|
1850 |
|
|
\begin{table}\begin{center}
|
1851 |
|
|
\begin{reglist}
|
1852 |
|
|
sR0 & 0 & 32 & R/W & Supervisor Register R0 \\\hline
|
1853 |
|
|
sR1 & 0 & 32 & R/W & Supervisor Register R1 \\\hline
|
1854 |
|
|
sSP & 13 & 32 & R/W & Supervisor Stack Pointer\\\hline
|
1855 |
|
|
sCC & 14 & 32 & R/W & Supervisor Condition Code Register \\\hline
|
1856 |
|
|
sPC & 15 & 32 & R/W & Supervisor Program Counter\\\hline
|
1857 |
|
|
uR0 & 16 & 32 & R/W & User Register R0 \\\hline
|
1858 |
|
|
uR1 & 17 & 32 & R/W & User Register R1 \\\hline
|
1859 |
|
|
uSP & 29 & 32 & R/W & User Stack Pointer\\\hline
|
1860 |
|
|
uCC & 30 & 32 & R/W & User Condition Code Register \\\hline
|
1861 |
|
|
uPC & 31 & 32 & R/W & User Program Counter\\\hline
|
1862 |
|
|
PIC & 32 & 32 & R/W & Primary Interrupt Controller \\\hline
|
1863 |
|
|
WDT & 33 & 32 & R/W & Watchdog Timer\\\hline
|
1864 |
|
|
CTRIC & 35 & 32 & R/W & Secondary Interrupt Controller\\\hline
|
1865 |
|
|
TMRA & 36 & 32 & R/W & Timer A\\\hline
|
1866 |
|
|
TMRB & 37 & 32 & R/W & Timer B\\\hline
|
1867 |
|
|
TMRC & 38 & 32 & R/W & Timer C\\\hline
|
1868 |
|
|
JIFF & 39 & 32 & R/W & Jiffies peripheral\\\hline
|
1869 |
|
|
MTASK & 40 & 32 & R/W & Master task clock counter\\\hline
|
1870 |
|
|
MMSTL & 41 & 32 & R/W & Master memory stall counter\\\hline
|
1871 |
|
|
MPSTL & 42 & 32 & R/W & Master Pre-Fetch Stall counter\\\hline
|
1872 |
|
|
MICNT & 43 & 32 & R/W & Master instruction counter\\\hline
|
1873 |
|
|
UTASK & 44 & 32 & R/W & User task clock counter\\\hline
|
1874 |
|
|
UMSTL & 45 & 32 & R/W & User memory stall counter\\\hline
|
1875 |
|
|
UPSTL & 46 & 32 & R/W & User Pre-Fetch Stall counter\\\hline
|
1876 |
|
|
UICNT & 47 & 32 & R/W & User instruction counter\\\hline
|
1877 |
39 |
dgisselq |
DMACMD & 48 & 32 & R/W & DMA command and status register\\\hline
|
1878 |
|
|
DMALEN & 49 & 32 & R/W & DMA transfer length\\\hline
|
1879 |
|
|
DMARD & 50 & 32 & R/W & DMA read address\\\hline
|
1880 |
|
|
DMAWR & 51 & 32 & R/W & DMA write address\\\hline
|
1881 |
33 |
dgisselq |
\end{reglist}
|
1882 |
|
|
\caption{Debug Register Addresses}\label{tbl:dbgaddrs}
|
1883 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1884 |
|
|
Primarily, these ``registers'' include access to the entire CPU register
|
1885 |
36 |
dgisselq |
set, as well as the internal peripherals. To read one of these registers
|
1886 |
33 |
dgisselq |
once the address is set, simply issue a read from the data port. To write
|
1887 |
|
|
one of these registers or peripheral ports, simply write to the data port
|
1888 |
|
|
after setting the proper address.
|
1889 |
|
|
|
1890 |
|
|
In this manner, all of the CPU's internal state may be read and adjusted.
|
1891 |
|
|
|
1892 |
|
|
As an example of how to use this, consider what would happen in the case
|
1893 |
|
|
of an external break point. If and when the CPU hits a break point that
|
1894 |
|
|
causes it to halt, the Command HALT bit will activate on its own, the CPU
|
1895 |
|
|
will then raise an external interrupt line and wait for a debugger to examine
|
1896 |
|
|
its state. After examining the state, the debugger will need to remove
|
1897 |
|
|
the breakpoint by writing a different instruction into memory and by writing
|
1898 |
|
|
to the command register while holding the clear cache, command halt, and
|
1899 |
|
|
step CPU bits high, (32'hd00). The debugger may then replace the breakpoint
|
1900 |
|
|
now that the CPU has gone beyond it, and clear the cache again (32'h500).
|
1901 |
|
|
|
1902 |
|
|
To leave this debug mode, simply write a `32'h0' value to the command register.
|
1903 |
|
|
|
1904 |
|
|
\chapter{Wishbone Datasheets}\label{chap:wishbone}
|
1905 |
32 |
dgisselq |
The Zip System supports two wishbone ports, a slave debug port and a master
|
1906 |
21 |
dgisselq |
port for the system itself. These are shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:wishbone-slave}
|
1907 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
1908 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
1909 |
|
|
\begin{wishboneds}
|
1910 |
|
|
Revision level of wishbone & WB B4 spec \\\hline
|
1911 |
|
|
Type of interface & Slave, Read/Write, single words only \\\hline
|
1912 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Address Width & 1--bit \\\hline
|
1913 |
21 |
dgisselq |
Port size & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1914 |
|
|
Port granularity & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1915 |
|
|
Maximum Operand Size & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1916 |
|
|
Data transfer ordering & (Irrelevant) \\\hline
|
1917 |
|
|
Clock constraints & Works at 100~MHz on a Basys--3 board\\\hline
|
1918 |
|
|
Signal Names & \begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1919 |
|
|
Signal Name & Wishbone Equivalent \\\hline
|
1920 |
|
|
{\tt i\_clk} & {\tt CLK\_I} \\
|
1921 |
|
|
{\tt i\_dbg\_cyc} & {\tt CYC\_I} \\
|
1922 |
|
|
{\tt i\_dbg\_stb} & {\tt STB\_I} \\
|
1923 |
|
|
{\tt i\_dbg\_we} & {\tt WE\_I} \\
|
1924 |
|
|
{\tt i\_dbg\_addr} & {\tt ADR\_I} \\
|
1925 |
|
|
{\tt i\_dbg\_data} & {\tt DAT\_I} \\
|
1926 |
|
|
{\tt o\_dbg\_ack} & {\tt ACK\_O} \\
|
1927 |
|
|
{\tt o\_dbg\_stall} & {\tt STALL\_O} \\
|
1928 |
|
|
{\tt o\_dbg\_data} & {\tt DAT\_O}
|
1929 |
|
|
\end{tabular}\\\hline
|
1930 |
|
|
\end{wishboneds}
|
1931 |
22 |
dgisselq |
\caption{Wishbone Datasheet for the Debug Interface}\label{tbl:wishbone-slave}
|
1932 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1933 |
|
|
and Tbl.~\ref{tbl:wishbone-master} respectively.
|
1934 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
1935 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
1936 |
|
|
\begin{wishboneds}
|
1937 |
|
|
Revision level of wishbone & WB B4 spec \\\hline
|
1938 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Type of interface & Master, Read/Write, single cycle or pipelined\\\hline
|
1939 |
|
|
Address Width & 32--bit bits \\\hline
|
1940 |
21 |
dgisselq |
Port size & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1941 |
|
|
Port granularity & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1942 |
|
|
Maximum Operand Size & 32--bit \\\hline
|
1943 |
|
|
Data transfer ordering & (Irrelevant) \\\hline
|
1944 |
|
|
Clock constraints & Works at 100~MHz on a Basys--3 board\\\hline
|
1945 |
|
|
Signal Names & \begin{tabular}{ll}
|
1946 |
|
|
Signal Name & Wishbone Equivalent \\\hline
|
1947 |
|
|
{\tt i\_clk} & {\tt CLK\_O} \\
|
1948 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_cyc} & {\tt CYC\_O} \\
|
1949 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_stb} & {\tt STB\_O} \\
|
1950 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_we} & {\tt WE\_O} \\
|
1951 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_addr} & {\tt ADR\_O} \\
|
1952 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_data} & {\tt DAT\_O} \\
|
1953 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_ack} & {\tt ACK\_I} \\
|
1954 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_stall} & {\tt STALL\_I} \\
|
1955 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_data} & {\tt DAT\_I}
|
1956 |
|
|
\end{tabular}\\\hline
|
1957 |
|
|
\end{wishboneds}
|
1958 |
22 |
dgisselq |
\caption{Wishbone Datasheet for the CPU as Master}\label{tbl:wishbone-master}
|
1959 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1960 |
|
|
I do not recommend that you connect these together through the interconnect.
|
1961 |
24 |
dgisselq |
Rather, the debug port of the CPU should be accessible regardless of the state
|
1962 |
|
|
of the master bus.
|
1963 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
1964 |
24 |
dgisselq |
You may wish to notice that neither the {\tt ERR} nor the {\tt RETRY} wires
|
1965 |
|
|
have been implemented. What this means is that the CPU is currently unable
|
1966 |
|
|
to detect a bus error condition, and so may stall indefinitely (hang) should
|
1967 |
|
|
it choose to access a value not on the bus, or a peripheral that is not
|
1968 |
|
|
yet properly configured.
|
1969 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
1970 |
|
|
\chapter{Clocks}\label{chap:clocks}
|
1971 |
|
|
|
1972 |
32 |
dgisselq |
This core is based upon the Basys--3 development board sold by Digilent.
|
1973 |
|
|
The Basys--3 development board contains one external 100~MHz clock, which is
|
1974 |
36 |
dgisselq |
sufficient to run the Zip CPU core.
|
1975 |
21 |
dgisselq |
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
1976 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
1977 |
|
|
\begin{clocklist}
|
1978 |
|
|
i\_clk & External & 100~MHz & 100~MHz & System clock.\\\hline
|
1979 |
|
|
\end{clocklist}
|
1980 |
|
|
\caption{List of Clocks}\label{tbl:clocks}
|
1981 |
|
|
\end{center}\end{table}
|
1982 |
|
|
I hesitate to suggest that the core can run faster than 100~MHz, since I have
|
1983 |
|
|
had struggled with various timing violations to keep it at 100~MHz. So, for
|
1984 |
|
|
now, I will only state that it can run at 100~MHz.
|
1985 |
|
|
|
1986 |
|
|
|
1987 |
|
|
\chapter{I/O Ports}\label{chap:ioports}
|
1988 |
33 |
dgisselq |
The I/O ports to the Zip CPU may be grouped into three categories. The first
|
1989 |
|
|
is that of the master wishbone used by the CPU, then the slave wishbone used
|
1990 |
|
|
to command the CPU via a debugger, and then the rest. The first two of these
|
1991 |
|
|
were already discussed in the wishbone chapter. They are listed here
|
1992 |
|
|
for completeness in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:iowb-master}
|
1993 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
1994 |
|
|
\begin{center}\begin{portlist}
|
1995 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_cyc} & 1 & Output & Indicates an active Wishbone cycle\\\hline
|
1996 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_stb} & 1 & Output & WB Strobe signal\\\hline
|
1997 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_we} & 1 & Output & Write enable\\\hline
|
1998 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_addr} & 32 & Output & Bus address \\\hline
|
1999 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_data} & 32 & Output & Data on WB write\\\hline
|
2000 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_ack} & 1 & Input & Slave has completed a R/W cycle\\\hline
|
2001 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_stall} & 1 & Input & WB bus slave not ready\\\hline
|
2002 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_data} & 32 & Input & Incoming bus data\\\hline
|
2003 |
|
|
\end{portlist}\caption{CPU Master Wishbone I/O Ports}\label{tbl:iowb-master}\end{center}\end{table}
|
2004 |
|
|
and~\ref{tbl:iowb-slave} respectively.
|
2005 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
2006 |
|
|
\begin{center}\begin{portlist}
|
2007 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_cyc} & 1 & Input & Indicates an active Wishbone cycle\\\hline
|
2008 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_stb} & 1 & Input & WB Strobe signal\\\hline
|
2009 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_we} & 1 & Input & Write enable\\\hline
|
2010 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_addr} & 1 & Input & Bus address, command or data port \\\hline
|
2011 |
|
|
{\tt i\_wb\_data} & 32 & Input & Data on WB write\\\hline
|
2012 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_ack} & 1 & Output & Slave has completed a R/W cycle\\\hline
|
2013 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_stall} & 1 & Output & WB bus slave not ready\\\hline
|
2014 |
|
|
{\tt o\_wb\_data} & 32 & Output & Incoming bus data\\\hline
|
2015 |
|
|
\end{portlist}\caption{CPU Debug Wishbone I/O Ports}\label{tbl:iowb-slave}\end{center}\end{table}
|
2016 |
21 |
dgisselq |
|
2017 |
33 |
dgisselq |
There are only four other lines to the CPU: the external clock, external
|
2018 |
|
|
reset, incoming external interrupt line(s), and the outgoing debug interrupt
|
2019 |
|
|
line. These are shown in Tbl.~\ref{tbl:ioports}.
|
2020 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
2021 |
|
|
\begin{center}\begin{portlist}
|
2022 |
|
|
{\tt i\_clk} & 1 & Input & The master CPU clock \\\hline
|
2023 |
|
|
{\tt i\_rst} & 1 & Input & Active high reset line \\\hline
|
2024 |
|
|
{\tt i\_ext\_int} & 1\ldots 6 & Input & Incoming external interrupts \\\hline
|
2025 |
|
|
{\tt o\_ext\_int} & 1 & Output & CPU Halted interrupt \\\hline
|
2026 |
|
|
\end{portlist}\caption{I/O Ports}\label{tbl:ioports}\end{center}\end{table}
|
2027 |
|
|
The clock line was discussed briefly in Chapt.~\ref{chap:clocks}. We
|
2028 |
|
|
typically run it at 100~MHz. The reset line is an active high reset. When
|
2029 |
|
|
asserted, the CPU will start running again from its reset address in
|
2030 |
|
|
memory. Further, depending upon how the CPU is configured and specifically on
|
2031 |
|
|
the {\tt START\_HALTED} parameter, it may or may not start running
|
2032 |
|
|
automatically. The {\tt i\_ext\_int} line is for an external interrupt. This
|
2033 |
|
|
line may be as wide as 6~external interrupts, depending upon the setting of
|
2034 |
|
|
the {\tt EXTERNAL\_INTERRUPTS} line. As currently configured, the ZipSystem
|
2035 |
|
|
only supports one such interrupt line by default. For us, this line is the
|
2036 |
|
|
output of another interrupt controller, but that's a board specific setup
|
2037 |
|
|
detail. Finally, the Zip System produces one external interrupt whenever
|
2038 |
|
|
the CPU halts to wait for the debugger.
|
2039 |
|
|
|
2040 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\chapter{Initial Assessment}\label{chap:assessment}
|
2041 |
|
|
|
2042 |
|
|
Having now worked with the Zip CPU for a while, it is worth offering an
|
2043 |
|
|
honest assessment of how well it works and how well it was designed. At the
|
2044 |
|
|
end of this assessment, I will propose some changes that may take place in a
|
2045 |
|
|
later version of this Zip CPU to make it better.
|
2046 |
|
|
|
2047 |
|
|
\section{The Good}
|
2048 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
2049 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU is light weight and fully featured as it exists today. For
|
2050 |
|
|
anyone who wishes to build a general purpose CPU and then to
|
2051 |
|
|
experiment with building and adding particular features, the Zip CPU
|
2052 |
|
|
makes a good starting point--it is fairly simple. Modifications should
|
2053 |
|
|
be simple enough.
|
2054 |
|
|
\item As an estimate of the ``weight'' of this implementation, the CPU has
|
2055 |
|
|
cost me less than 150 hours to implement from its inception.
|
2056 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU was designed to be an implementable soft core that could be
|
2057 |
|
|
placed within an FPGA, controlling actions internal to the FPGA. It
|
2058 |
|
|
fits this role rather nicely. It does not fit the role of a system on
|
2059 |
|
|
a chip very well, but then it was never intended to be a system on a
|
2060 |
|
|
chip but rather a system within a chip.
|
2061 |
|
|
\item The extremely simplified instruction set of the Zip CPU was a good
|
2062 |
|
|
choice. Although it does not have many of the commonly used
|
2063 |
|
|
instructions, PUSH, POP, JSR, and RET among them, the simplified
|
2064 |
|
|
instruction set has demonstrated an amazing versatility. I will contend
|
2065 |
|
|
therefore and for anyone who will listen, that this instruction set
|
2066 |
|
|
offers a full and complete capability for whatever a user might wish
|
2067 |
|
|
to do with two exceptions: bytewise character access and accelerated
|
2068 |
|
|
floating-point support.
|
2069 |
|
|
\item This simplified instruction set is easy to decode.
|
2070 |
|
|
\item The simplified bus transactions (32-bit words only) were also very easy
|
2071 |
|
|
to implement.
|
2072 |
|
|
\item The novel approach of having a single interrupt vector, which just
|
2073 |
|
|
brings the CPU back to the instruction it left off at within the last
|
2074 |
|
|
interrupt context doesn't appear to have been that much of a problem.
|
2075 |
|
|
If most modern systems handle interrupt vectoring in software anyway,
|
2076 |
|
|
why maintain hardware support for it?
|
2077 |
|
|
\item My goal of a high rate of instructions per clock may not be the proper
|
2078 |
|
|
measure. For example, if instructions are being read from a SPI flash
|
2079 |
|
|
device, such as is common among FPGA implementations, these same
|
2080 |
|
|
instructions may suffer stalls of between 64 and 128 cycles per
|
2081 |
|
|
instruction just to read the instruction from the flash. Executing the
|
2082 |
|
|
instruction in a single clock cycle is no longer the appropriate
|
2083 |
|
|
measure. At the same time, it should be possible to use the DMA
|
2084 |
|
|
peripheral to copy instructions from the FLASH to a temporary memory
|
2085 |
|
|
location, after which they may be executed at a single instruction
|
2086 |
|
|
cycle per access again.
|
2087 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
2088 |
|
|
|
2089 |
|
|
\section{The Not so Good}
|
2090 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
2091 |
|
|
\item While one of the stated goals was to use a small amount of logic,
|
2092 |
|
|
3k~LUTs isn't that impressively small. Indeed, it's really much
|
2093 |
|
|
too expensive when compared against other 8 and 16-bit CPUs that have
|
2094 |
|
|
less than 1k LUTs.
|
2095 |
|
|
|
2096 |
|
|
Still, \ldots it's not bad, it's just not astonishingly good.
|
2097 |
|
|
|
2098 |
|
|
\item The fact that the instruction width equals the bus width means that the
|
2099 |
|
|
instruction fetch cycle will always be interfering with any load or
|
2100 |
|
|
store memory operation, with the only exception being if the
|
2101 |
|
|
instruction is already in the cache. {\em This has become the
|
2102 |
|
|
fundamental limit on the speed and performance of the CPU!}
|
2103 |
|
|
Those familiar with the Von--Neumann approach of sharing a bus
|
2104 |
|
|
between data and instructions will not be surprised by this assessment.
|
2105 |
|
|
|
2106 |
|
|
This could be fixed in one of three ways: the instruction set
|
2107 |
|
|
architecture could be modified to handle Very Long Instruction Words
|
2108 |
|
|
(VLIW) so that each 32--bit word would encode two or more instructions,
|
2109 |
|
|
the instruction fetch bus width could be increased from 32--bits to
|
2110 |
|
|
64--bits or more, or the instruction bus could be separated from the
|
2111 |
|
|
data bus. Any and all of these approaches would increase the overall
|
2112 |
|
|
LUT count.
|
2113 |
|
|
|
2114 |
|
|
\item The (non-existant) floating point unit was an after-thought, isn't even
|
2115 |
|
|
built as a potential option, and most likely won't support the full
|
2116 |
|
|
IEEE standard set of FPU instructions--even for single point precision.
|
2117 |
|
|
This (non-existant) capability would benefit the most from an
|
2118 |
|
|
out-of-order execution capability, which the Zip CPU does not have.
|
2119 |
|
|
|
2120 |
|
|
Still, sharing FPU registers with the main register set was a good
|
2121 |
|
|
idea and worth preserving, as it simplifies context swapping.
|
2122 |
|
|
|
2123 |
|
|
Perhaps this really isn't a problem, but rather a feature. By not
|
2124 |
|
|
implementing FPU instructions, the Zip CPU maintains a lower LUT count
|
2125 |
|
|
than it would have if it did implement these instructions.
|
2126 |
|
|
|
2127 |
|
|
\item The CPU has no character support. This is both good and bad.
|
2128 |
|
|
Realistically, the CPU works just fine without it. Characters can be
|
2129 |
|
|
supported as subsets of 32-bit words without any problem. Practically,
|
2130 |
|
|
though, it will make compiling non-Zip CPU code difficult--especially
|
2131 |
|
|
anything that assumes sizeof(int)=4*sizeof(char), or that tries to
|
2132 |
|
|
create unions with characters and integers and then attempts to
|
2133 |
|
|
reference the address of the characters within that union.
|
2134 |
|
|
|
2135 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU does not support a data cache. One can still be built
|
2136 |
|
|
externally, but this is a limitation of the CPU proper as built.
|
2137 |
|
|
Further, under the theory of the Zip CPU design (that of an embedded
|
2138 |
|
|
soft-core processor within an FPGA, where any ``address'' may reference
|
2139 |
|
|
either memory or a peripheral that may have side-effects), any data
|
2140 |
|
|
cache would need to be based upon an initial knowledge of whether or
|
2141 |
|
|
not it is supporting memory (cachable) or peripherals. This knowledge
|
2142 |
|
|
must exist somewhere, and that somewhere is currently (and by design)
|
2143 |
|
|
external to the CPU.
|
2144 |
|
|
|
2145 |
|
|
This may also be written off as a ``feature'' of the Zip CPU, since
|
2146 |
|
|
the addition of a data cache can greatly increase the LUT count of
|
2147 |
|
|
a soft core.
|
2148 |
|
|
|
2149 |
|
|
\item Many other instruction sets offer three operand instructions, whereas
|
2150 |
|
|
the Zip CPU only offers two operand instructions. This means that it
|
2151 |
|
|
takes the Zip CPU more instructions to do many of the same operations.
|
2152 |
|
|
The good part of this is that it gives the Zip CPU a greater amount of
|
2153 |
|
|
flexibility in its immediate operand mode, although that increased
|
2154 |
|
|
flexibility isn't necessarily as valuable as one might like.
|
2155 |
|
|
|
2156 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU does not currently detect and trap on either illegal
|
2157 |
|
|
instructions or bus errors. Attempts to access non--existent
|
2158 |
|
|
memory quietly return erroneous results, rather than halting the
|
2159 |
|
|
process (user mode) or halting or resetting the CPU (supervisor mode).
|
2160 |
|
|
|
2161 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU doesn't support out of order execution. I suppose it could
|
2162 |
|
|
be modified to do so, but then it would no longer be the ``simple''
|
2163 |
|
|
and low LUT count CPU it was designed to be. The two primary results
|
2164 |
|
|
are that 1) loads may unnecessarily stall the CPU, even if other
|
2165 |
|
|
things could be done while waiting for the load to complete, 2)
|
2166 |
|
|
bus errors on stores will never be caught at the point of the error,
|
2167 |
|
|
and 3) branch prediction becomes more difficult.
|
2168 |
|
|
|
2169 |
|
|
\item Although switching to an interrupt context in the Zip CPU design doesn't
|
2170 |
|
|
require a tremendous swapping of registers, in reality it still
|
2171 |
|
|
does--since any task swap still requires saving and restoring all
|
2172 |
|
|
16~user registers. That's a lot of memory movement just to service
|
2173 |
|
|
an interrupt.
|
2174 |
|
|
|
2175 |
|
|
\item The Zip CPU is by no means generic: it will never handle addresses
|
2176 |
|
|
larger than 32-bits (16GB) without a complete and total redesign.
|
2177 |
|
|
This may limit its utility as a generic CPU in the future, although
|
2178 |
|
|
as an embedded CPU within an FPGA this isn't really much of a limit
|
2179 |
|
|
or restriction.
|
2180 |
|
|
|
2181 |
|
|
\item While the Zip CPU has its own assembler, it has no linker and does not
|
2182 |
|
|
(yet) support a compiler. The standard C library is an even longer
|
2183 |
|
|
shot. My dream of having binutils and gcc support has not been
|
2184 |
|
|
realized and at this rate may not be realized. (I've been intimidated
|
2185 |
|
|
by the challenge everytime I've looked through those codes.)
|
2186 |
|
|
|
2187 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\iffalse
|
2188 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\item While the Wishbone Bus (B4) supports a pipelined mode with single cycle
|
2189 |
|
|
execution, the Zip CPU is unable to exploit this parallelism. Instead,
|
2190 |
|
|
apart from the DMA and the pipelined prefetch, all loads and stores
|
2191 |
|
|
are single wishbone bus operations requiring a minimum of 3 clocks.
|
2192 |
|
|
(In practice, this has turned into 7-clocks.)
|
2193 |
39 |
dgisselq |
% Addressed, 20150929
|
2194 |
36 |
dgisselq |
|
2195 |
|
|
\item There is no control over whether or not an instruction sets the
|
2196 |
|
|
condition codes--certain instructions always set the condition codes,
|
2197 |
|
|
other instructions never set them. This effectively limits conditional
|
2198 |
|
|
instructions to a single instruction only (with two or more
|
2199 |
|
|
instructions as an exception), as the first instruction that sets
|
2200 |
|
|
condition codes will break the condition code chain.
|
2201 |
|
|
|
2202 |
|
|
{\em (A proposed change below address this.)}
|
2203 |
|
|
|
2204 |
|
|
\item Using the CC register as a trap address was a bad idea--it limits the CC
|
2205 |
|
|
registers ability to be used in future expansion, such as by adding
|
2206 |
|
|
exception indication flags: bus error, floating point exception, etc.
|
2207 |
|
|
|
2208 |
|
|
{\em (This can be changed by a different O/S implementation of the trap
|
2209 |
|
|
instruction.)}
|
2210 |
|
|
\item The current implementation suffers from too many stalls on any
|
2211 |
|
|
branch--even if the branch is known early on.
|
2212 |
|
|
|
2213 |
|
|
{\em (This is addressed in proposals below.)}
|
2214 |
|
|
% Addressed, 20150918
|
2215 |
|
|
|
2216 |
|
|
\item In a similar fashion, a switch to interrupt context forces the pipeline
|
2217 |
|
|
to be cleared, whereas it might make more sense to just continue
|
2218 |
|
|
executing the instructions already in the pipeline while the prefetch
|
2219 |
|
|
stage is working on switching to the interrupt context.
|
2220 |
|
|
|
2221 |
|
|
{\em (Also addressed in proposals below.)}
|
2222 |
|
|
% This should happen so rarely that it is not really a problem
|
2223 |
|
|
\fi
|
2224 |
|
|
|
2225 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
2226 |
|
|
|
2227 |
|
|
\section{The Next Generation}
|
2228 |
|
|
This section could also be labeled as my ``To do'' list.
|
2229 |
|
|
|
2230 |
|
|
Given the feedback listed above, perhaps its time to consider what changes could be made to improve the Zip CPU in the future. I offer the following as proposals:
|
2231 |
|
|
|
2232 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
2233 |
|
|
\item {\bf Remove the low LUT goal.} It wasn't really achieved, and the
|
2234 |
|
|
proposals below will only increase the amount of logic the Zip CPU
|
2235 |
|
|
requires. While I expect that the Zip CPU will always be somewhat
|
2236 |
|
|
of a light weight, it will never be the smallest kid on the block.
|
2237 |
|
|
|
2238 |
|
|
I'm actually struggling with this idea. The whole goal of the Zip
|
2239 |
|
|
CPU was to be light weight. Wouldn't it make more sense to create and
|
2240 |
|
|
maintain options whereby it would remain lightweight? For example, if
|
2241 |
|
|
the process accounting registers are anything but light weight, why
|
2242 |
|
|
keep them? Why not instead make some compile flags that just turn them
|
2243 |
|
|
off, keeping the CPU lightweight? The same holds for the prefetch
|
2244 |
|
|
cache.
|
2245 |
|
|
|
2246 |
39 |
dgisselq |
\item The `{\tt .V}' condition was never used in any code other than my test
|
2247 |
|
|
code. Suggest changing it to a `{\tt .LE}' condition, which seems
|
2248 |
|
|
to be more useful.
|
2249 |
|
|
|
2250 |
|
|
\item {\bf Consider a more traditional Instruction Cache.} The current
|
2251 |
|
|
pipelined instruction cache just reads a window of memory into
|
2252 |
|
|
its cache. If the CPU leaves that window, the entire cache is
|
2253 |
|
|
invalidated. A more traditional cache, however, might allow
|
2254 |
|
|
common subroutines to stay within the cache without invalidating the
|
2255 |
|
|
entire cache structure.
|
2256 |
|
|
|
2257 |
36 |
dgisselq |
\iffalse
|
2258 |
|
|
\item {\bf Adjust the Zip CPU so that conditional instructions do not set
|
2259 |
|
|
flags}, although they may explicitly set condition codes if writing
|
2260 |
|
|
to the CC register.
|
2261 |
|
|
|
2262 |
|
|
This is a simple change to the core, and may show up in new releases.
|
2263 |
|
|
% Fixed, 20150918
|
2264 |
|
|
|
2265 |
|
|
\item Add in an {\bf unpredictable branch delay slot}, so that on any branch
|
2266 |
|
|
the delay slot may or may not be executed before the branch.
|
2267 |
|
|
Instructions that do not depend upon the branch, and that should be
|
2268 |
|
|
executed were the branch not taken, could be placed into the delay
|
2269 |
|
|
slot. Thus, if the branch isn't taken, we wouldn't suffer the stall,
|
2270 |
|
|
whereas it wouldn't affect the timing of the branch if taken. It would
|
2271 |
|
|
just do something irrelevant.
|
2272 |
|
|
|
2273 |
|
|
% Changes made, 20150918, make this option no longer relevant
|
2274 |
|
|
|
2275 |
|
|
\item {\bf Re-engineer Branch Processing.} There's no reason why a {\tt BRA}
|
2276 |
|
|
instruction should create five stall cycles. The decode stage, plus
|
2277 |
|
|
the prefetch engine, should be able to drop this number of stalls via
|
2278 |
|
|
better branch handling.
|
2279 |
|
|
|
2280 |
|
|
Indeed, this could turn into a simple means of branch prediction:
|
2281 |
|
|
if {\tt BRA} suffered a single stall only, whereas {\tt BRA.C}
|
2282 |
|
|
suffered five stalls, then {\tt BRA.!C} followed by {\tt BRA} would
|
2283 |
|
|
be faster than a {\tt BRA.C} instruction. This would then allow a
|
2284 |
|
|
compiler to do explicit branch optimizations.
|
2285 |
|
|
|
2286 |
|
|
Of course, longer branches using {\tt ADD X,PC} would still not be
|
2287 |
|
|
optimized.
|
2288 |
|
|
|
2289 |
|
|
% DONE: 20150918 -- to include the ADD X,PC instructions
|
2290 |
|
|
|
2291 |
|
|
\item {\bf Request bus access for Load/Store two cycles earlier.} The problem
|
2292 |
|
|
here is the contention for the bus between the memory unit and the
|
2293 |
|
|
prefetch unit. Currently, the memory unit must ask the prefetch
|
2294 |
|
|
unit to release the bus if it is in the middle of a bus cycle. At this
|
2295 |
|
|
point, the prefetch drops the {\tt STB} line on the next clock and must
|
2296 |
|
|
then wait for the last {\tt ACK} before releasing the bus. If the
|
2297 |
|
|
request takes one clock, dropping the strobe line the next, waiting
|
2298 |
|
|
for an acknowledgement takes another, and then the bus must be idle
|
2299 |
|
|
for one cycle before starting again, these extra cycles add up.
|
2300 |
|
|
It should be possible to tell the prefetch stage to give up the bus
|
2301 |
|
|
as soon as the decoder knows the instruction will need the bus.
|
2302 |
|
|
Indeed, if done in the decode stage, this might drop the seven cycle
|
2303 |
|
|
access down by two cycles.
|
2304 |
|
|
% FIXED: 20150918
|
2305 |
|
|
|
2306 |
|
|
\item {\bf Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW).} Now, to speed up operation, I
|
2307 |
|
|
propose that the Zip CPU instruction set be modified towards a Very
|
2308 |
|
|
Long Instruction Word (VLIW) implementation. In this implementation,
|
2309 |
|
|
an instruction word may contain either one or two separate
|
2310 |
|
|
instructions. The first instruction would take up the high order bits,
|
2311 |
|
|
the second optional instruction the lower 16-bits. Further, I propose
|
2312 |
|
|
that any of the ALU instructions (SUB through LSR) automatically have
|
2313 |
|
|
a second instruction whenever their operand `B' is a register, and use
|
2314 |
|
|
the full 20-bit immediate if not. This will effectively eliminate the
|
2315 |
|
|
register plus immediate mode for all of these instructions.
|
2316 |
|
|
|
2317 |
|
|
This is the minimal required change to increase the number of
|
2318 |
|
|
instructions per clock cycle. Other changes would need to take place
|
2319 |
|
|
as well to support this. These include:
|
2320 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
2321 |
|
|
\item Instruction words containing two instructions would take two
|
2322 |
|
|
clocks to complete, while requiring only a single cycle
|
2323 |
|
|
instruction fetch.
|
2324 |
|
|
\item Instructions preceded by a label in the asseembler must always
|
2325 |
|
|
start in the high order word.
|
2326 |
|
|
\item VLIW's, once started, must always execute to completion. The
|
2327 |
|
|
upper word may set the PC, the lower word may not. Regardless
|
2328 |
|
|
of whether the upper word sets the PC, the lower word must
|
2329 |
|
|
still be guaranteed to complete before the PC changes. On any
|
2330 |
|
|
switch to (or from) interrupt context, both instructions must
|
2331 |
|
|
complete or none of the instructions in the word shall
|
2332 |
|
|
complete prior to the switch.
|
2333 |
|
|
\item STEP commands and BREAK instructions will only take place after
|
2334 |
|
|
the entire word is executed.
|
2335 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
2336 |
|
|
|
2337 |
|
|
If done well, the assembler should be able to handle these changes
|
2338 |
|
|
with the biggest impacts to the user being increased performance and
|
2339 |
|
|
a loss of the register plus immediate ALU modes. (These weren't really
|
2340 |
|
|
relevant for the XOR, OR, AND, etc. operations anyway.) Machine code
|
2341 |
|
|
compatibility will not be maintained.
|
2342 |
|
|
|
2343 |
|
|
A proposed secondary instruction set might consist of: a four bit
|
2344 |
|
|
operand (any of the prior instructions would be supported, with some
|
2345 |
|
|
exceptions such as moves to and from user registers while in
|
2346 |
|
|
supervisor mode not being supported), a 4-bit register result (PC not
|
2347 |
|
|
allowed), a 3-bit conditional (identical to the conditional for the
|
2348 |
|
|
upper word), a single bit for whether or not an immediate is present
|
2349 |
|
|
or not, followed by either a 4-bit register or a 4-bit signed
|
2350 |
|
|
immediate. The multiply instruction would steal the immediate flag to
|
2351 |
|
|
be used as a sign indication, forcing both operands to be registers
|
2352 |
|
|
without any immediate offsets.
|
2353 |
|
|
|
2354 |
|
|
{\em Initial conversion of several library functions to this secondary
|
2355 |
|
|
instruction set has demonstrated little to no gain. The problem was
|
2356 |
|
|
that the new instruction set was made by joining a rarely used
|
2357 |
|
|
instruction (ALU with register and not immediate) with a more common
|
2358 |
|
|
instruction. The utility was then limited by the utility of the rare
|
2359 |
|
|
instrction, which limited the impact of the entire approach. }
|
2360 |
|
|
\else
|
2361 |
|
|
\item {\bf Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW).} The goal here would be to
|
2362 |
|
|
create a new instruction set whereby two instructions would be encoded
|
2363 |
|
|
in each 32--bit word. While this may speed up
|
2364 |
|
|
CPU operation, it would necessitate an instruction redesign.
|
2365 |
|
|
\fi
|
2366 |
|
|
|
2367 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
2368 |
|
|
|
2369 |
|
|
|
2370 |
21 |
dgisselq |
% Appendices
|
2371 |
|
|
% Index
|
2372 |
|
|
\end{document}
|
2373 |
|
|
|
2374 |
|
|
|