OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/socgen/socgen/trunk

Subversion Repositories socgen

Compare Revisions

  • This comparison shows the changes necessary to convert path
    /socgen/trunk
    from Rev 1 to Rev 2
    Reverse comparison

Rev 1 → Rev 2

/doc/prj_description.pdf Cannot display: file marked as a binary type. svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
doc/prj_description.pdf Property changes : Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +application/octet-stream \ No newline at end of property Index: doc/src/prj_description.html =================================================================== --- doc/src/prj_description.html (nonexistent) +++ doc/src/prj_description.html (revision 2) @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + + + socgen_prj_description + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+



+

+
+

SOCGEN Project

+

Design for Reuse

+

The SOCGEN project is a laboratory for developing and +demonstrating the methods and processes needed to create and reuse +digital components. The goal of the project is to create a open +source set of eda tools that will enable a designer to configure and +assemble a complete System_on_a_chip (SOC) in a quick, easy and error +free manner.

+

I am hosting this project on Opencores due to the availability of +free opensourced ip modules and a user community that is in dire need +of a good design for reuse solution. I will be taking various +opencores modules and reworking them into the socgen repository. +Design for reuse is all about efficiency. Any code can be reused if +you devote enough time and energy to it but paying attention to the +details can make a huge difference in how easy it is to reuse a +module. Any one is welcome to use these versions of the modules and +the scripts that I am creating. Feedback is always welcome.

+

The entire industry is about to experience a change in the way +that chips are designed that will be as dramatic as it was back in +the early 90's. Before that point the most common tool for design +entry was schematic capture. But designs had grown to the point where +that was far to inefficient and it was replaced with a rtl to +synthesis process.

+

That happened 20 years ago and chips have continued to grow to the +point where you can no longer design and verify the rtl code in a +reasonable time. +

+

My approach to this problem is to introduce modern hi volume +production line theory into the IC design process. The designs are +too complex to simply get a group together and hand craft rtl code. +Socgen will develop the tools and processes needed to assemble cores +together in quick and predictable manner.

+

+

+

A good deal of this effort involves understanding database design +and usage. Most designers simply construct their databases based +only on their immediate and past needs. Socgen will provide a +repository of various projects that have been converted to show how +small changes in where you store files can make a big difference in +how easily those files can be reused.

+



+

+

All socgen tools and components are released under LGPL. Any other +opencores projects used in the repository will retain their original +license.

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+

Socgen will provide:

+
    +
  1. Installation instructions for any and all external tools + needed

    +
  2. Proper data base design and management tools and techniques

    +
  3. Proper design verification

    +
  4. All modules will be proven in silicon

    +
+



+

+

Socgen is a work in process so expect to see frequent changes. All +socgen tools are run under Makefiles and I will try to keep the top +level commands constant.

+



+

+

Till Later

+



+

+

John Eaton

+



+

+



+

+ + \ No newline at end of file Index: doc/src/manifesto.html =================================================================== --- doc/src/manifesto.html (nonexistent) +++ doc/src/manifesto.html (revision 2) @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ + + + + + socgen project manifesto + + + + + + + + + + +
+



+

+
+

SOCGEN Project

+

Manifesto

+

The semiconductor industry is in the process of undergoing a +complete metamorphosis that will change forever the way digital +electronic products are designed. The last time this occurred was +back in the 1990's when schematic capture was a popular tool for +designing ICs. But designs grew to the point where you couldn't plop +down a gate and and connect it fast enough to create and verify a net +list in a reasonable amount of time. So schematic capture has been +replaced in all but the simplest designs with a HDL/SYNTHESIS flow.

+

That happened about 15 years ago and despite constant predictions +of the demise of Moore's Observation we now find ourselves back in +the same situation, You cannot type fast enough to create and verify +a net list in a reasonable amount of time.

+

The solution that is now emerging to meet this growing demand is +Design For Reuse(DFR). This methodology recognizes that the vast +majority of design work is simply a rehash of work that someone else +has already done. If you could reuse and leverage preexisting code +then the amount of new design work needed drops off dramatically.

+

The SOCGEN project was created to provide a free open-sourced +Design for Reuse tool set for asic and fpga developers. It will also +provide industry standard best practice guidelines that show how to +create a reusable design as well as a series of IP modules and +designs to demonstrate the proper way to make a design.

+

Everything in the SOCGEN project is released under GPL3 as free +and open source. SOCGEN will partner with other opensource or +free-to-use tools to form a complete embedded systems tool chain that +includes IC design, PCB design, Firmware development and real time +debugging. +

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+



+

+

Why am I doing this?

+

Theres an old saying that everyone has at least one good novel in +them. For an engineer it's at least one good open source project. I +spent my career as a electrical engineer working for Hewlett-Packard. +Nothing in my years in R+D could prepare me for what we had to do to +create deep submicron asic designs. The chip sizes and complexities +grew every year and it was a struggle to keep up with all the new +processes. But I had spent several years working as a production +engineer mostly bringing new products up the production ramp and the +techniques used in manufacturing were exactly what were needed to +design DeepSubMicron asics.

+

R+D engineers tend to work like ye olde Yankee craftsmen. They go +into their shops and spend a lot of time handcrafting a design and it +is beautiful when finished. But it also takes a lot of time and the +demand is such that you will soon need every adult male in New +England working in the shops to meet production quotas. It's time to +part with the traditional ways and create a high volume manufacturing +line for asics.That is the goal of Design for Reuse.

+

I was fortunate to work at HP in a design group that was doing +bleeding edge development of design for reuse techniques. The Inkjet +Peripheral group had a IC design team that spanned four divisions and +a support operation. We did 2-4 asic designs a year and did this year +after year after year. We designed families of chips doing one for +low-end, high volume , one for high end, high performance and if the +vintage chart called for it , one in the middle.

+

We designed platform asics. There were to many products to do one +chip per product so the chip that went into an All-In_One printer +scanner could also go into a Photo printer or a stand alone printer. +The extra silicon needed to support unused functions was nothing +compared to the cost savings from combining product volumes into a +single part. Pin's on the other hand were precious. The pins needed +to drive the scanner interface were multiplexed with the Photo card +pins as well as GPIO pins. The code would configure the chip for +whatever product it happened to find itself in.

+

We also did multi-Vendor designs. Our volumes were to high to only +have a single source. Plus we wanted the pricing that came from +having multiple sources. One year we did a family of three asics with +three different vendors plus a fourth chip that was the low end +design second sourced from two of the vendors. On top of all this we +breadboarded all three designs in a FPGA system.

+

I learned a lot about how to share and reuse IP and delivering a +working net list on schedule. We were well ahead of the rest of the +industry.

+

The recession ended my career after 28 years and 10 months. I was +57 and trying to figure out what I wanted to do now that I had grown +up. When I started my career an asic mask set cost about $50,000. At +the end of it they were quoting about $1,200,000. Asic design starts +had been dropping year over year even before the recession. Fewer and +fewer companies could afford to do asics. Staying with asics meant +moving.

+

FPGA's one the other and were booming. Larger chips were opening +up new areas where fpga only products were feasible and becoming more +common. I also could see that FPGAs were following the same growth +curve that asics took 20 years ago and that fpga designers were +making the same tool mistakes that asic designers made. Some fpga +designers still use schematic capture.

+

This became my mission. To create the tool set needed to generate +System_on_Chip net lists for FPGA and asic designers. I know there +are a lot of big guns in the EDA industry also trying to do this but +I have some advantages. First of all I'm not in it for the money. The +tools that I have tried out all have to squeeze in enough features to +justify their price tags. They become bloated. Design for Reuse is +not a complicated problem. The tool that we used at HP to preform +most of the work was a simple macro preprocessor module that we +downloaded from CPAN. +

+

Second of all ,most of the commercial design for reuse tools +didn't work. I would sit through the dog and pony shows telling me +how these tools would do the job. Then we would start telling them +about our design environment and their eyes would start glazing over. +Their tools work fine if you have one design team in one location +doing one chip with one vendor but anything beyond that is iffy.

+

Last of all they were addressing the wrong problem. They were +trying to reuse IP that was never designed to be reused. That hard. +SOCGEN tells you how to design IP so that it is reusable. That makes +a big difference.

+

SOCGEN is a living project. I will be adding to it on a continuous +basis from here on out. My legal constraints with HP have ended so I +am sole owner of all the work that I create. I will not be adding any +code here that was developed at HP. I now realize that we made a +fundamental mistake in our tool set. We started by creating stand +alone tools that ran under gmake and started working from the fringes +of the design into the core. That was wrong. We should have started +at the core and worked our way out to the fringes. The first SOCGEN +tools will take that approach.

+

SOCGEN will also partner with and use other open source EDA tools +when convenient. gEDA has a well developed PCB design flow and I +intend to use gschem as part of my tool flow to feed parts to the +PCB. Schematic capture is a useful tool. It's just that you do not +want to be plopping down gates and connecting wires. You want to be +plopping down components and connecting interfaces. +

+

Till Later

+



+

+

John Eaton

+



+

+



+

+ + \ No newline at end of file Index: doc/manifesto.pdf =================================================================== Cannot display: file marked as a binary type. svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream Index: doc/manifesto.pdf =================================================================== --- doc/manifesto.pdf (nonexistent) +++ doc/manifesto.pdf (revision 2)
doc/manifesto.pdf Property changes : Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +application/octet-stream \ No newline at end of property

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.