URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/core1990_interlaken/core1990_interlaken/trunk

Subversion Repositories core1990_interlaken

[/] [core1990_interlaken/] [trunk/] [documentation/] [protocol_survey_report/] [Sections/] [Survey_Vendor.tex] - Diff between revs 5 and 9

Rev 5	Rev 9
Line 52...	Line 52...
`\caption{The LiteFast block diagram (Single Lane).}`	`\caption{The LiteFast block diagram (Single Lane).}`
`\label{fig:LiteFast_Block}`	`\label{fig:LiteFast_Block}`
`\end{figure}`	`\end{figure}`

`\subsection{Conclusion}`	`\subsection{Conclusion}`
`\comment{Include Microsemi?}`
`To conclude this section, a bullet point overview of the protocols is added. This will mention the features of both vendor dependent protocols and compare them with each other.\\`	`To conclude this section, a bullet point overview of the protocols is added. This will mention the features of both vendor dependent protocols and compare them with each other.\\`
`\begin{itemize}`	`\begin{itemize}`
`\item Both protocols offer line rates which will push the transceivers to their limits. Aurora mentions about 26 Gbps and Serial Lite III about 28 Gbps per transceiver`	`\item Both protocols offer line rates which will push the transceivers to their limits. Aurora mentions about 26 Gbps and Serial Lite III about 28 Gbps per transceiver`
`\item Aurora features flow control while Serial Lite III is not clear on this. (In contrast Serial Lite II does support flow control)`	`\item Aurora features flow control while Serial Lite III is not clear on this. (In contrast Serial Lite II does support flow control)`
`\item Both offer CRC-32 error correction, FEC is not mentioned in the documentations`	`\item Both offer CRC-32 error correction, FEC is not mentioned in the documentations`