URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/open8_urisc/open8_urisc/trunk
Subversion Repositories open8_urisc
[/] [open8_urisc/] [trunk/] [gnu/] [binutils/] [binutils/] [MAINTAINERS] - Rev 163
Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
========= Binutils Maintainers =========This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and updateof the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of otherprograms (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd andopcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with theGCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files isshared amoungst the projects.The home page for binutils is:http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.htmland patches should be sent to:binutils@sourceware.orgwith "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to thetop level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:config-patches@gnu.organd not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top levelconfigure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) shouldbe sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdblists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org andgdb-patches@sourceware.org).--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------The following people have permission to check patches into therepository without obtaining approval first:Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org>Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>--------- Maintainers ---------Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and havepermission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Notethat maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside ofthe immediate domain that they maintain.If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibilityfalls to the head maintainer (above). If there are severalmaintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the firstmaintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve thatresponsibility among the other maintainers.ALPHA Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>ARM Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>AVR Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>AVR Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@amelek.gda.pl>BFIN Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>BFIN Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>BFIN Mike Frysinger <michael.frysinger@analog.com>BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>CR16 M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>CRX M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias <nkavv@physics.auth.gr>DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>DWARF2 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>EPIPHANY Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>FR30 Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>FRV Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>FRV Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>H8300 Prafulla Thakare <prafulla.thakare@kpitcummins.com>HPPA Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>HPPA elf64 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> [Basic maintainance only]IA-64 Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>IQ2000 Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@rice.edu>ix86 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>ix86 PE Christopher Faylor <me+binutils@cgf.cx>ix86 COFF DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>ix86 PE/COFF Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>LM32 Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>M32R Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <stcarrez@nerim.fr>M88k Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>MACH-O Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>MAXQ Inderpreet Singh <inderpreetb@noida.hcltech.com>MEP Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>MICROBLAZE Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>Moxie Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>MSP430 Dmitry Diky <diwil@spec.ru>NetBSD support Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>Open8 Kirk Hays <khays@hayshaus.com>PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>PPC Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>RL78 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>RX DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>RX Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>SCORE Mei Ligang <ligang@sunnorth.com.cn>SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>SH Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>SPARC David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>SPU Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>TIC4X Svein Seldal <svein@dev.seldal.com>TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>TIC6X Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>TILE-Gx Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>TILEPro Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>VAX Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>VMS Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>x86_64 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>XCOFF Richard Sandiford <r.sandiford@uk.ibm.com>Xtensa Sterling Augustine <augustine.sterling@gmail.com>z80 Arnold Metselaar <arnold.metselaar@planet.nl>z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but itis mentioned here since there is a single group that maintainsCGEN and the files that it creates.If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;cgen@sourceware.orgThe current CGEN maintainers are:Doug Evans, Frank Eigler--------- Write After Approval ---------Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check inchanges, but they must get approval for each change from someone inone of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Justremember to get approval before checking anything in.]------------- Obvious Fixes -------------Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked inright away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, thenyou should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes forspelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code isalso blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always besmall, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they containsome un-obvious side effect or consequence.--------- Branch Checkins ---------If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it canalso be checked into the current release branch. Normally howeveronly bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, newports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise theburden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes toogreat). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate forthe branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>-------- Testsuites ---------------In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should beconsidered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list forapproval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility therelevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-privelegesperson.-------- Configure patches ----------Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approvedby the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the configmaintainer at:config-patches@gnu.org--------- Creating Branches ---------Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branchto use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSFpolicies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from peoplewith appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legalrequirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equallyto contributions on a branch.Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch ofthe form:binutils-<org>-<name>where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initialsif you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch createdby The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for"org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choicefor "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so"name" may contain additional hyphens.Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop aport of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriatechoice of branch name would be:binutils-tgc-fmA date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but someorganizations like to have one. If you do include the date, youshould follow these rules:1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.For example:binutils-tgc-fm_20050101would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:1. Check out binutils, so that you have a CVS checkout correspondingto the initial state of your branch.2. Create a tag:cvs tag binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpointThat tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what'schanged on the branch relative to the initial state.3. Create the branch:cvs rtag -b -r binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint \binutils-<org>-<name>-branch4. Document the branch:Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and checkthat file in. All branch descriptions should be added to theHEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modifybinutils/BRANCHES on a branch!Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not createwithout the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
