URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc/openrisc/trunk
Subversion Repositories openrisc
[/] [openrisc/] [tags/] [gnu-dev/] [fsf-gcc-snapshot-1-mar-12/] [or1k-gcc/] [gcc/] [testsuite/] [g++.dg/] [cpp0x/] [implicit8.C] - Rev 783
Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
// The hack for PR c++/44909 breaks this testcase. We need feedback
// from the C++ committee to know how to proceed.
// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
struct A
{
A();
A(A&);
};
struct B;
struct BP
{
BP(const B&);
};
struct B
{
B();
B(B&&);
B(const BP&);
};
// If B(B&&) suppresses the B copy constructor, then copying the B
// subobject of C should use B(const BP&). But we ignore that constructor
// in order to break the cycle in 44909. Perhaps the move ctor shouldn't
// suppress the copy ctor?
// As of DR 1082, it doesn't suppress it.
struct C: A, B { }; // { dg-error "use of deleted" }
C c;
C c2(c); // { dg-error "deleted" }