URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc/openrisc/trunk
Subversion Repositories openrisc
[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-dev/] [or1k-gcc/] [gcc/] [testsuite/] [gcc.c-torture/] [execute/] [pr28982a.c] - Rev 849
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
/* PR rtl-optimization/28982. Function foo() does the equivalent of: float tmp_results[NVARS]; for (int i = 0; i < NVARS; i++) { int inc = incs[i]; float *ptr = ptrs[i], result = 0; for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) result += *ptr, ptr += inc; tmp_results[i] = result; } memcpy (results, tmp_results, sizeof (results)); but without the outermost loop. The idea is to create high register pressure and ensure that some INC and PTR variables are spilled. On ARM targets, sequences like "result += *ptr, ptr += inc" can usually be implemented using (mem (post_modify ...)), and we do indeed create such MEMs before reload for this testcase. However, (post_modify ...) is not a valid address for coprocessor loads, so for -mfloat-abi=softfp, reload reloads the POST_MODIFY into a base register. GCC did not deal correctly with cases where the base and index of the POST_MODIFY are themselves reloaded. */ #define NITER 4 #define NVARS 20 #define MULTI(X) \ X( 0), X( 1), X( 2), X( 3), X( 4), X( 5), X( 6), X( 7), X( 8), X( 9), \ X(10), X(11), X(12), X(13), X(14), X(15), X(16), X(17), X(18), X(19) #define DECLAREI(INDEX) inc##INDEX = incs[INDEX] #define DECLAREF(INDEX) *ptr##INDEX = ptrs[INDEX], result##INDEX = 0 #define LOOP(INDEX) result##INDEX += *ptr##INDEX, ptr##INDEX += inc##INDEX #define COPYOUT(INDEX) results[INDEX] = result##INDEX float *ptrs[NVARS]; float results[NVARS]; int incs[NVARS]; void __attribute__((noinline)) foo (int n) { int MULTI (DECLAREI); float MULTI (DECLAREF); while (n--) MULTI (LOOP); MULTI (COPYOUT); } float input[NITER * NVARS]; int main (void) { int i; for (i = 0; i < NVARS; i++) ptrs[i] = input + i, incs[i] = i; for (i = 0; i < NITER * NVARS; i++) input[i] = i; foo (NITER); for (i = 0; i < NVARS; i++) if (results[i] != i * NITER * (NITER + 1) / 2) return 1; return 0; }
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log