OpenCores
URL https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc/openrisc/trunk

Subversion Repositories openrisc

[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-old/] [gcc-4.2.2/] [gcc/] [testsuite/] [gcc.dg/] [tree-ssa/] [loop-4.c] - Rev 154

Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log

/* A test for strength reduction and induction variable elimination.  */
 
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target size32plus } */
 
/* Size of this structure should be sufficiently weird so that no memory
   addressing mode applies.  */
 
struct bla
{
  char x[187];
  int y;
  char z[253];
} arr_base[100];
 
int foo(void);
 
void xxx(void)
{
  int iter;
 
  for (iter = 0; iter < 100; iter++)
    arr_base[iter].y = foo ();
}
 
/* Access to arr_base[iter].y should be strength reduced.  Depending on
   whether we have an addressing mode of type [base + offset], one of the
   following forms might get chosen:
 
   -- induction variable with base &arr_base[0].y, the memory access of
      form *iv = ...
   -- induction variable with base 0, the memory access of form
      *(iv + &arr_base[0].y) = ...
 
   In any case, we should not have any multiplication.  */
 
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\* \[^\\n\\r\]*=" 0 "optimized" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\[^\\n\\r\]*= \\* " 0 "optimized" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MEM" 1 "optimized" } } */
 
/* And the original induction variable should be eliminated.  */
 
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "iter" 0 "optimized" } } */
 
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
 

Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log

powered by: WebSVN 2.1.0

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.