URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/openrisc_2011-10-31/openrisc_2011-10-31/trunk
Subversion Repositories openrisc_2011-10-31
[/] [openrisc/] [trunk/] [gnu-src/] [gcc-4.5.1/] [gcc/] [testsuite/] [gfortran.dg/] [c_by_val_5.f90] - Rev 302
Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
! { dg-do run }
! Overwrite -pedantic setting:
! { dg-options "-Wall" }
!
! Tests the fix for PR31668, in which %VAL was rejected for
! module and internal procedures.
!
subroutine bmp_write(nx)
implicit none
integer, value :: nx
if(nx /= 10) call abort()
nx = 11
if(nx /= 11) call abort()
end subroutine bmp_write
module x
implicit none
! The following interface does in principle
! not match the procedure (missing VALUE attribute)
! However, this occures in real-world code calling
! C routines where an interface is better than
! "external" only.
interface
subroutine bmp_write(nx)
integer :: nx
end subroutine bmp_write
end interface
contains
SUBROUTINE Grid2BMP(NX)
INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: NX
if(nx /= 10) call abort()
call bmp_write(%val(nx))
if(nx /= 10) call abort()
END SUBROUTINE Grid2BMP
END module x
! The following test is possible and
! accepted by other compilers, but
! does not make much sense.
! Either one uses VALUE then %VAL is
! not needed or the function will give
! wrong results.
!
!subroutine test()
! implicit none
! integer :: n
! n = 5
! if(n /= 5) call abort()
! call test2(%VAL(n))
! if(n /= 5) call abort()
! contains
! subroutine test2(a)
! integer, value :: a
! if(a /= 5) call abort()
! a = 2
! if(a /= 2) call abort()
! end subroutine test2
!end subroutine test
program main
use x
implicit none
! external test
call Grid2BMP(10)
! call test()
end program main
! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "x" } }