Subversion Repositories or1k

#   Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
# 
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
# 
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.  

# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu

if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
    verbose "Skipping signals.exp because of nosignals."
    continue
}

if $tracelevel then {
        strace $tracelevel
}

set prms_id 0
set bug_id 0

set testfile signals
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
     gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}

# Create and source the file that provides information about the compiler
# used to compile the test case.
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
    return -1;
}

if {$hp_cc_compiler} {
    set void 0
} else {
    set void void
}

proc signal_tests_1 {} {
    global gdb_prompt
    if [runto_main] then {
        gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" \
                "next over signal (SIGALRM, handler)"
        gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" \
                "next over signal (SIGUSR1, handler)"
        gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
                "next over alarm (1)"
        # An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
        sleep 2

        # i386 BSD currently fails the next test with a SIGTRAP.
        setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsd*"
        # But Dynix has a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK of zero, so the failure
        # is shadowed by hitting the through_sigtramp_breakpoint.
        clear_xfail "i*86-sequent-bsd*"
        # Univel SVR4 i386 continues instead of stepping.
        setup_xfail "i*86-univel-sysv4*"
        # lynx fails with "next" acting like "continue"
        setup_xfail "*-*-*lynx*"
        # linux (aout versions) also fails with "next" acting like "continue"
        # this is probably more dependant on the kernel version than on the
        # object file format or utils.  (sigh)
        setup_xfail "i*86-pc-linuxaout-gnu" "i*86-pc-linuxoldld-gnu"
        send_gdb "next\n"
        gdb_expect {
            -re "alarm .*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "next to 2nd alarm (1)" }
            -re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*first.*$gdb_prompt $" {

                # This can happen on machines that have a trace flag
                # in their PS register.
                # The trace flag in the PS register will be set due to
                # the `next' command.
                # Before calling the signal handler, the PS register
                # is pushed along with the context on the user stack.
                # When the signal handler has finished, it reenters the
                # the kernel via a sigreturn syscall, which restores the
                # PS register along with the context.
                # If the kernel erroneously does not clear the trace flag
                # in the pushed context, gdb will receive a SIGTRAP from
                # the set trace flag in the restored context after the
                # signal handler has finished.

                # I do not yet understand why the SIGTRAP does not occur
                # after stepping the instruction at the restored PC on
                # i386 BSDI 1.0 systems.

                # Note that the vax under Ultrix also exhibits
                # this behaviour (it is uncovered by the `continue from
                # a break in a signal handler' test below).
                # With this test the failure is shadowed by hitting the
                # through_sigtramp_breakpoint upon return from the signal
                # handler.

                # SVR4 and Linux based i*86 systems exhibit this behaviour
                # as well (it is uncovered by the `continue from a break
                # in a signal handler' test below).
                # As these systems use procfs, where we tell the kernel not
                # to tell gdb about `pass' signals, and the trace flag is
                # cleared by the kernel before entering the sigtramp
                # routine, GDB will not notice the execution of the signal 
                # handler.
                # Upon return from the signal handler, GDB will receive
                # a SIGTRAP from the set trace flag in the restored context.
                # The SIGTRAP marks the end of a (albeit long winded)
                # single step for GDB, causing this test to pass.

                fail "next to 2nd alarm (1) (probably kernel bug)"
                gdb_test "next" "alarm.*" "next to 2nd alarm (1)"
            }
            -re "Program exited with code.*$gdb_prompt $" {

                # This is apparently a bug in the UnixWare kernel (but
                # has not been investigated beyond the
                # resume/target_wait level, and has not been reported
                # to Univel).  If it steps when a signal is pending,
                # it does a continue instead.  I don't know whether
                # there is a workaround.

                # Perhaps this problem exists on other SVR4 systems;
                # but (a) we have no reason to think so, and (b) if we
                # put a wrong xfail here, we never get an XPASS to let
                # us know that it was incorrect (and then if such a
                # configuration regresses we have no way of knowing).
                # Solaris is not a relevant data point either way
                # because it lacks single stepping.

                # fnf: I don't agree with the above philosophy.  We
                # can never be sure that any particular XFAIL is
                # specified 100% correctly in that no systems with
                # the bug are missed and all systems without the bug
                # are excluded.  If we include an XFAIL that isn't
                # appropriate for a particular system, then when that
                # system gets tested it will XPASS, and someone should
                # investigate and fix the setup_xfail as appropriate,
                # or more preferably, the actual bug.  Each such case
                # adds more data to narrowing down the scope of the
                # problem and ultimately fixing it.

                setup_xfail "i*86-*-sysv4*"
                fail "'next' behaved as 'continue (known SVR4 bug)'"
                return 0
            }
            -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1)" }
            timeout { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1); (timeout)" }
            eof { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1); (eof)" }
        }

        gdb_test "break handler" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
        gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
            "next to 2nd ++count in signals_tests_1"
        # An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
        sleep 2

        set bash_bug 0
        send_gdb "next\n"
        gdb_expect {
            -re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$gdb_prompt $" {
                pass "next to handler in signals_tests_1"
            }
            -re "Program received signal SIGEMT.*$gdb_prompt $" {
                # Bash versions before 1.13.5 cause this behaviour
                # by blocking SIGTRAP.
                fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (known problem with bash versions before 1.13.5)"
                set bash_bug 1
                gdb_test "signal 0" "Breakpoint.*handler.*"
            }
            -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1" }
            timeout { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (timeout)" }
            eof { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (eof)" }
        }

        # This doesn't test that main is frame #2, just that main is frame
        # #2, #3, or higher.  At some point this should be fixed (but
        # it quite possibly would introduce new FAILs on some systems).
        setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsdi2.0"
        gdb_test "backtrace 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" \
            "backtrace in signals_tests_1"

        gdb_test "break func1" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
        gdb_test "break func2" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"

        # Vax Ultrix and i386 BSD currently fail the next test with
        # a SIGTRAP, but with different symptoms.
        setup_xfail "vax-*-ultrix*"
        setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsd*"
        setup_xfail "i*86-pc-linux-gnu*"
        setup_xfail "i*86-*-solaris2*"
        send_gdb "continue\n"
        gdb_expect {
            -re "Breakpoint.*func1.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "continue to func1" }
            -re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*second.*$gdb_prompt $" {

                # See explanation for `next to 2nd alarm (1)' fail above.
                # We did step into the signal handler, hit a breakpoint
                # in the handler and continued from the breakpoint.
                # The set trace flag in the restored context is causing
                # the SIGTRAP, without stepping an instruction.

                fail "continue to func1 (probably kernel bug)"
                gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func1.*" \
                    "extra continue to func1"
            }
            -re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*func1 ..;.*$gdb_prompt $" {

                # On the vax under Ultrix the set trace flag in the restored
                # context is causing the SIGTRAP, but after stepping one
                # instruction, as expected.

                fail "continue to func1 (probably kernel bug)"
                gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func1.*" \
                    "extra continue to func1"
            }
            -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continue to func1" }
            default { fail "continue to func1" }
        }

        setup_xfail "*-*-irix*"
        send_gdb "signal SIGUSR1\n"
        gdb_expect {
            -re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "signal SIGUSR1" }
            -re "Program received signal SIGUSR1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
                # This is what irix4 and irix5 do.
                # It would appear to be a kernel bug.
                fail "signal SIGUSR1"
                gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "pass it SIGUSR1"
            }
            -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
            default { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
        }

        # Will tend to wrongly require an extra continue.

        # The problem here is that the breakpoint at func1 will be
        # inserted, and when the system finishes with the signal
        # handler it will try to execute there.  For GDB to try to
        # remember that it was going to step over a breakpoint when a
        # signal happened, distinguish this case from the case where
        # func1 is called from the signal handler, etc., seems
        # exceedingly difficult.  So don't expect this to get fixed
        # anytime soon.

        setup_xfail "*-*-*"
        send_gdb "continue\n"
        gdb_expect {
            -re "Breakpoint.*func2.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "continue to func2" }
            -re "Breakpoint.*func1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
                fail "continue to func2"
                gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func2.*" \
                    "extra continue to func2"
            }
            -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continue to func2" }
            default { fail "continue to func2" }
        }

        sleep 2

        # GDB yanks out the breakpoints to step over the breakpoint it
        # stopped at, which means the breakpoint at handler is yanked.
        # But if SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P, we won't get another chance to
        # reinsert them (at least not with procfs, where we tell the kernel
        # not to tell gdb about `pass' signals).  So the fix would appear to
        # be to just yank that one breakpoint when we step over it.

        setup_xfail "sparc*-*-*"
        setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
        setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"

        # A faulty bash will not step the inferior into sigtramp on sun3.
        if {$bash_bug} then {
            setup_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
        }

        setup_xfail "i*86-pc-linux-gnu*"
        setup_xfail "i*86-*-solaris2*"
        gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "continue to handler"

        # If the SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P failure happened, we have already
        # exited.
        # If we succeeded a continue will return from the handler to func2.
        # GDB now has `forgotten' that it intended to step over the
        # breakpoint at func2 and will stop at func2.
        setup_xfail "*-*-*"
        # The sun3 with a faulty bash will also be `forgetful' but it
        # already got the spurious stop at func2 and this continue will work.
        if {$bash_bug} then {
             clear_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
        }
        gdb_test "continue" "Program exited with code 010\\." \
            "continue to exit in signals_tests_1 "
    }
}

# On a few losing systems, ptrace (PT_CONTINUE) or ptrace (PT_STEP)
# causes pending signals to be cleared, which causes these tests to
# get nowhere fast.  This is totally losing behavior (perhaps there
# are cases in which is it useful but the user needs more control,
# which they mostly have in GDB), but some people apparently think it
# is a feature.  It is documented in the ptrace manpage on Motorola
# Delta Series sysV68 R3V7.1 and on HPUX 9.0.  Even the non-HPUX PA
# OSes (BSD and OSF/1) seem to have figured they had to copy this
# braindamage.

if {[ istarget "m68*-motorola-*" ] || [ istarget "hppa*-*-bsd*" ] ||
    [ istarget "hppa*-*-osf*" ]} then {
  setup_xfail "*-*-*"
  fail "ptrace loses on signals on this target"
  return 0
}

# lynx2.2.2 doesn't lose signals, instead it screws up the stack pointer
# in some of these tests leading to massive problems.  I've
# reported this to lynx, hopefully it'll be fixed in lynx2.3.
# Severe braindamage.
if [ istarget "*-*-*lynx*" ] then {
  setup_xfail "*-*-*"
  fail "kernel scroggs stack pointer in signal tests on this target"
  return 0
}

gdb_exit
gdb_start

# This will need to be updated as the exact list of signals changes,
# but I want to test that TARGET_SIGNAL_0, TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT, and
# TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN are skipped.
proc test_handle_all_print {} {
    global timeout
    # Increase timeout and expect input buffer for large output from gdb.
    # Allow blank or TAB as whitespace characters.
    set oldtimeout $timeout
    set timeout [expr "$timeout + 360"]
    verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2
    if { ![istarget "*-*-linux*"]
         && ( [istarget "*-*-gnu*"]
              || [istarget "*-*-mach*"] ) } {
        gdb_test "handle all print" "Signal\[   \]+Stop\[       \]+Print\[      \]+Pass to program\[    \]+Description\r\nSIGHUP\[      \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Hangup.*SIG63\[      \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Real-time event 63.*EXC_BREAKPOINT\[         \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Breakpoint"
    } else {
        gdb_test "handle all print" "Signal\[   \]+Stop\[       \]+Print\[      \]+Pass to program\[    \]+Description\r\nSIGHUP\[      \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Hangup.*SIG63\[      \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Yes\[        \]+Real-time event 63.*"
    }
    set timeout $oldtimeout
    verbose "Timeout restored to $timeout seconds" 2
}
test_handle_all_print

gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load $binfile
signal_tests_1

# Force a resync, so we're looking at the right prompt.  On SCO we
# were getting out of sync (I don't understand why).
send_gdb "p 1+1\n"
gdb_expect {
    -re "= 2.*$gdb_prompt $" {}
    -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
    default { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
}

if [runto_main] then {
    gdb_test "break handler if 0" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
    gdb_test "set \$handler_breakpoint_number = \$bpnum" ""

    # Get to the point where a signal is waiting to be delivered
    gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" "next to signal in signals.exp"
    gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #1 in signals.exp"
    gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
        "next to ++count #1 in signals.exp"
    # Give the signal time to get delivered
    sleep 2

    # Now call a function.  When GDB tries to run the stack dummy,
    # it will hit the breakpoint at handler.  Provided it doesn't
    # lose its cool, this is not a problem, it just has to note
    # that the breakpoint condition is false and keep going.

    gdb_test "p func1 ()" "^p func1 \\(\\)\r\n.\[0-9\]* = $void" \
        "p func1 () #1 in signals.exp"

    # Make sure the count got incremented.

    # Haven't investigated this xfail
    setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
    setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
    gdb_test "p count" "= 2" "p count #1 in signals.exp"
    if { [istarget "rs6000-*-*"] || [istarget "powerpc-*-*"] } { return 0 }

    gdb_test "condition \$handler_breakpoint_number" "now unconditional\\."
    gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #2 in signals.exp"
    gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
        "next to ++count #2 in signals.exp"
    sleep 2

    # This time we stop when GDB tries to run the stack dummy.
    # So it is OK that we do not print the return value from the function.
    gdb_test "p func1 ()" \
"Breakpoint \[0-9\]*, handler.*
The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.*" \
        "p func1 () #2 in signals.exp"
    # But we should be able to backtrace...
    # On alpha-*-osf2.0 this test works when run manually but sometime fails when
    # run under dejagnu, making it very hard to debug the problem.  Weird...
    gdb_test "bt 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" "bt in signals.exp"
    # ...and continue...
    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\." "continue in signals.exp"
    # ...and then count should have been incremented
    gdb_test "p count" "= 5" "p count #2 in signals.exp"


# Verify that "info signals" produces reasonable output.
#
    send_gdb "info signals\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "SIGHUP.*SIGINT.*SIGQUIT.*SIGILL.*SIGTRAP.*SIGABRT.*SIGEMT.*SIGFPE.*SIGKILL.*SIGBUS.*SIGSEGV.*SIGSYS.*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*SIGURG.*SIGSTOP.*SIGTSTP.*SIGCONT.*SIGCHLD.*SIGTTIN.*SIGTTOU.*SIGIO.*SIGXCPU.*SIGXFSZ.*SIGVTALRM.*SIGPROF.*SIGWINCH.*SIGLOST.*SIGUSR1.*SIGUSR2.*SIGPWR.*SIGPOLL.*SIGWIND.*SIGPHONE.*SIGWAITING.*SIGLWP.*SIGDANGER.*SIGGRANT.*SIGRETRACT.*SIGMSG.*SIGSOUND.*SIGSAK.*SIGPRIO.*SIG33.*SIG34.*SIG35.*SIG36.*SIG37.*SIG38.*SIG39.*SIG40.*SIG41.*SIG42.*SIG43.*SIG44.*SIG45.*SIG46.*SIG47.*SIG48.*SIG49.*SIG50.*SIG51.*SIG52.*SIG53.*SIG54.*SIG55.*SIG56.*SIG57.*SIG58.*SIG59.*SIG60.*SIG61.*SIG62.*SIG63.*Use the \"handle\" command to change these tables.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "info signals"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "info signals"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) info signals"}
    }

# Verify that "info signal" correctly handles an argument, be it a
# symbolic signal name, or an integer ID.
#
    send_gdb "info signal SIGTRAP\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "info signal SIGTRAP"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "info signal SIGTRAP"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) info signal SIGTRAP"}
    }

    send_gdb "info signal 5\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "info signal 5"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "info signal 5"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) info signal 5"}
    }

# Verify that "handle" with illegal arguments is gracefully, um, handled.
#
    send_gdb "handle\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Argument required .signal to handle.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle without arguments"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle without arguments"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle without arguments"}
    }

    send_gdb "handle SIGFOO\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Unrecognized or ambiguous flag word: \"SIGFOO\".*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle with bogus SIG"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle with bogus SIG"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle with bogus SIG"}
    }

    send_gdb "handle SIGHUP frump\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Unrecognized or ambiguous flag word: \"frump\".*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle SIG with bogus action"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle SIG with bogus action"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG with bogus action"}
    }

# Verify that "handle" can take multiple actions per SIG, and that in
# the case of conflicting actions, that the rightmost action "wins".
#
    send_gdb "handle SIGHUP print noprint\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGHUP\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Hangup.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
    }

# Exercise all the various actions.  (We don't care what the outcome
# is, this is just to ensure that they all can be parsed.)
#
    send_gdb "handle SIGHUP print noprint stop nostop ignore noignore pass nopass\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*Signal.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
    }

# Verify that we can "handle" multiple signals at once, interspersed
# with actions.
#
    send_gdb "handle SIG63 print SIGILL\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGILL\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Illegal instruction.*SIG63\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Real-time event 63.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle multiple SIGs"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle multiple SIGs"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs"}
    }

# Verify that "handle" can take a numeric argument for the signal ID,
# rather than a symbolic name.  (This may not be portable; works for
# HP-UX.)
#
# Also note that this testpoint overrides SIGTRAP, which on HP-UX at
# least, is used to implement single-steps and breakpoints.  Don't
# expect to run the inferior after this!
#
    send_gdb "handle 5 nopass\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGTRAP is used by the debugger.*Are you sure you want to change it.*y or n.*"\
              {send_gdb "y\n"
               gdb_expect {
                 -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
                         {pass "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
                 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
                         {fail "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
                 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
               }
              }
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
    }

# GDB doesn't seem to allow numeric signal IDs larger than 15.  Verify
# that restriction.  ??rehrauer: Not sure if this is a feature or a
# bug, actually.  Why is the range 1-15?
#
    send_gdb "handle 58\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Only signals 1-15 are valid as numeric signals.*Use \"info signals\" for a list of symbolic signals.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "invalid signal number rejected"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "invalid signal number rejected"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) invalid signal number rejected"}
    }

# Verify that we can accept a signal ID range (number-number).
# ??rehrauer: This feature isn't documented on the quick-reference
# card.
#
    send_gdb "handle 13-15\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}

    }

# Bizarrely enough, GDB also allows you to reverse the range
# stat, stop IDs.  E.g., "3-1" and "1-3" mean the same thing.
# Probably this isn't documented, but the code anticipates it,
# so we'd best test it...
#
    send_gdb "handle 15-13\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}

    }

# SIGINT is used by the debugger as well.  Verify that we can change
# our minds about changing it.
#
    send_gdb "handle SIGINT nopass\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re ".*SIGINT is used by the debugger.*Are you sure you want to change it.*y or n.*"\
              {send_gdb "n\n"
# ??rehrauer: When you answer "n", the header for the signal info is
# printed, but not the actual handler settings.  Probably a bug.
#
               gdb_expect {
                 -re "Not confirmed, unchanged.*Signal.*$gdb_prompt $"\
                         {pass "override SIGINT"}
                 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
                         {fail "override SIGINT"}
                 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGINT"}
               }
              }
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "override SIGINT"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGINT"}
    }

# Verify that GDB responds gracefully to the "signal" command with
# a missing argument.
#
    send_gdb "signal\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Argument required .signal number..*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "signal without arguments disallowed"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "signal without arguments disallowed"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) signal without arguments disallowed"}
    }

# Verify that we can successfully send a signal other than 0 to
# the inferior.  (This probably causes the inferior to run away.
# Be prepared to rerun to main for further testing.)
#
    send_gdb "signal 5\n"
    gdb_expect {
      -re "Continuing with signal SIGTRAP.*$gdb_prompt $"\
              {pass "sent signal 5"}
      -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
              {fail "sent signal 5"}
      timeout {fail "(timeout) sent signal 5"}
    }

}

return 0