URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/or1k/or1k/trunk
Subversion Repositories or1k
[/] [or1k/] [trunk/] [insight/] [sim/] [i960/] [tconfig.in] - Rev 1767
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
/* I960 target configuration file. -*- C -*- */
/* See sim-hload.c. We properly handle LMA. */
#define SIM_HANDLES_LMA 1
/* For MSPR support. FIXME: revisit. */
#define WITH_DEVICES 1
/* FIXME: Revisit. */
#ifdef HAVE_DV_SOCKSER
MODULE_INSTALL_FN dv_sockser_install;
#define MODULE_LIST dv_sockser_install,
#endif
#if 0
/* Enable watchpoints. */
#define WITH_WATCHPOINTS 1
#endif
/* ??? Temporary hack until model support unified. */
#define SIM_HAVE_MODEL
/* Define this to enable the intrinsic breakpoint mechanism. */
/* FIXME: may be able to remove SIM_HAVE_BREAKPOINT since it essentially
duplicates ifdef SIM_BREAKPOINT (right?) */
#if 0
#define SIM_HAVE_BREAKPOINTS
#define SIM_BREAKPOINT { 0x10, 0xf1 }
#define SIM_BREAKPOINT_SIZE 2
#endif
/* This is a global setting. Different cpu families can't mix-n-match -scache
and -pbb. However some cpu families may use -simple while others use
one of -scache/-pbb. */
#define WITH_SCACHE_PBB 1
#if 0
/* ??? This was obsoleted by the PBB code. */
/* The semantic code should probably always use a switch().
However, in case that's not possible in some circumstance, we allow
the target to choose. Perhaps this can be autoconf'd on whether the
switch is too big? I can't (yet) think of a reason for allowing the
user to choose, though the developer may certainly wish to. */
#ifdef WANT_CPU_I960BASE
#define WITH_FAST 1
#define WITH_SEM_SWITCH_FULL 0
#define WITH_SEM_SWITCH_FAST 1
#endif
#endif
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log