URL
https://opencores.org/ocsvn/or1k/or1k/trunk
Subversion Repositories or1k
[/] [or1k/] [trunk/] [rc203soc/] [sw/] [uClinux/] [include/] [asm-i386/] [locks.h] - Rev 1633
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log
/* * SMP locks primitives for building ix86 locks * (not yet used). * * Alan Cox, alan@cymru.net, 1995 */ /* * This would be much easier but far less clear and easy * to borrow for other processors if it was just assembler. */ extern __inline__ void prim_spin_lock(struct spinlock *sp) { int processor=smp_processor_id(); /* * Grab the lock bit */ while(lock_set_bit(0,&sp->lock)) { /* * Failed, but that's cos we own it! */ if(sp->cpu==processor) { sp->users++; return 0; } /* * Spin in the cache S state if possible */ while(sp->lock) { /* * Wait for any invalidates to go off */ if(smp_invalidate_needed&(1<<processor)) while(lock_clear_bit(processor,&smp_invalidate_needed)) local_flush_tlb(); sp->spins++; } /* * Someone wrote the line, we go 'I' and get * the cache entry. Now try to regrab */ } sp->users++;sp->cpu=processor; return 1; } /* * Release a spin lock */ extern __inline__ int prim_spin_unlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* This is safe. The decrement is still guarded by the lock. A multilock would not be safe this way */ if(!--sp->users) { lock_clear_bit(0,&sp->lock);sp->cpu= NO_PROC_ID; return 1; } return 0; } /* * Non blocking lock grab */ extern __inline__ int prim_spin_lock_nb(struct spinlock *sp) { if(lock_set_bit(0,&sp->lock)) return 0; /* Locked already */ sp->users++; return 1; /* We got the lock */ } /* * These wrap the locking primitives up for usage */ extern __inline__ void spinlock(struct spinlock *sp) { if(sp->priority<current->lock_order) panic("lock order violation: %s (%d)\n", sp->name, current->lock_order); if(prim_spin_lock(sp)) { /* * We got a new lock. Update the priority chain */ sp->oldpri=current->lock_order; current->lock_order=sp->priority; } } extern __inline__ void spinunlock(struct spinlock *sp) { if(current->lock_order!=sp->priority) panic("lock release order violation %s (%d)\n", sp->name, current->lock_order); if(prim_spin_unlock(sp)) { /* * Update the debugging lock priority chain. We dumped * our last right to the lock. */ current->lock_order=sp->oldpri; } } extern __inline__ void spintestlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* * We do no sanity checks, it's legal to optimistically * get a lower lock. */ prim_spin_lock_nb(sp); } extern __inline__ void spintestunlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* * A testlock doesn't update the lock chain so we * must not update it on free */ prim_spin_unlock(sp); }
Go to most recent revision | Compare with Previous | Blame | View Log