![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_rt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_rt.png)
Re: Core Licenses Questions
by Unknown on Jan 6, 2005 |
Not available! | ||
Did you look at the License Zone on Open Collector?
http://opencollector.org/hardlicense/
It is not updated but a part of the discussion has
already been done.
Fabrizio
|
Re: Core Licenses Questions
by Unknown on Jan 6, 2005 |
Not available! | ||
Ciao Fabrizio
I can't post to the opencores list (I receive it, but it doesn't accept my mails). But I would say the opencollector license area is not a good place to start - it is not only old, but it never reached any usable conclusion. One day I will archive the pages properly and try to tidy it all up, but not now. My original goal was to try to reach a gpl-style license, but it was never achieved. This is different from the majority opinion on opencores which seems to be that bsd makes more sense. best Graham On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Fabrizio Fazzino wrote:
Did you look at the License Zone on Open Collector?
http://opencollector.org/hardlicense/
It is not updated but a part of the discussion has
already been done.
Fabrizio
_______________________________________________
http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
|
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_rt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_rt.png)