![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_rt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_rt.png)
Is there any alternative method to synthesise codes using math_real?
by Unknown on Jan 20, 2005 |
Not available! | ||
Respected sir(s)/ madam(s), I am a final year student working on a project on FFT. Since my inputs & twiddle factors require the use of math_real library, I used it & was succesful in simulating it. But, can you tell me how I can synthesise my code? Thanks Rgds Rish |
Is there any alternative method to synthesise codes using math_real?
by RT on Jan 21, 2005 |
RT
Posts: 10 Joined: Sep 2, 2009 Last seen: Sep 27, 2011 |
||
rishadh at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Respected sir(s)/ madam(s),
I am a final year student working on a project on FFT. Since my inputs & twiddle factors require the use of math_real library, I used it & was succesful in simulating it. But, can you tell me how I can synthesise my code? Well, the short answer is that you can't, without also creating floating-point adders and multipliers, which is much harder than coding an FFT. If you really want to synthesise without floating point, then you'll need to go back to the drawing board and look up integer and block FFTs. Doing an FFT with integer arithmetic is a difficult problem, because of the nature of Fourier Transforms: you get very little dynamic range in integers. RT |
Is there any alternative method to synthesise codes using math_real?
by Unknown on Jan 21, 2005 |
Not available! | ||
rishadh at yahoo.co.uk escribió:
Respected sir(s)/ madam(s),
Perhaps you can change a little bit your design, adding a processor
and then doing the math operations on it :)
--
Técnico Andrés Trapanotto
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÃA INDUSTRIAL
Centro de Investigación Telecomunicaciones, Electrónica e Informática
Teléfono (54 11) 4724 6300 Interno 6362
andres_t at inti.gov.ar
___________________________________________
0800 444 4004 | www.inti.gov.ar
I am a final year student working on a project on FFT. Since my inputs & twiddle factors require the use of math_real library, I used it & was succesful in simulating it. But, can you tell me how I can synthesise my code? |
Is there any alternative method to synthesise codes using math_real?
by Unknown on Jan 21, 2005 |
Not available! | ||
I'd say adding a processor is going to be harder/slower then trying to
get some sort of FPU.
What kind of area requirements are you looking at? And did you look
at the Verilog FPU core?
An altenative is a new VHDL draft standard with synthesizable floating
point support. I did not have much luck getting it to work, but a lot
of the issues I had were just related to figureing out the tools (this
was early in the semester). It was VHDL-FP or FP-VHDL, Google can
definitly find it, as would a search of the FPGA and VHDL newsgroups.
Mike
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:20:01 -0300, Andrés Trapanotto
andres_t at inti.gov.ar> wrote:
rishadh at yahoo.co.uk escribió:
>Respected sir(s)/ madam(s),
Perhaps you can change a little bit your design, adding a processor
and then doing the math operations on it :)
--
Técnico Andrés Trapanotto
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÃA INDUSTRIAL
Centro de Investigación Telecomunicaciones, Electrónica e Informática
Teléfono (54 11) 4724 6300 Interno 6362
andres_t at inti.gov.ar
___________________________________________
0800 444 4004 | www.inti.gov.ar
_______________________________________________
http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
> >I am a final year student working on a project on FFT. Since my inputs & >twiddle factors require the use of math_real library, I used it & was >succesful in simulating it. > >But, can you tell me how I can synthesise my code? > > > |
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_lt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pil_rt.png)
![no use](https://cdn.opencores.org/img/pils_rt.png)