OpenCores

OpenCores

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1?

no use

no use

1/1

no use

no use

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? by Unknown on Apr 20, 2004			Not available!
Hi When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set clmode_i = 2'b00, the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1? best regards, kevin Hi When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set clmode_i = 2'b00, the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1? best regards, kevin

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? by Unknown on May 3, 2004			Not available!
Kevin you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. or1200_defines.v says: // // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock // // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines // // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED // and use clmode to set ratio // // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use // clmode to set ratio `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you commenting out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@hotmail.com">kevinlinsun@hotmail.com</A>> To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@opencores.org">openrisc@opencores.org</A>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q] Hi When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set clmode_i = 2'b00, the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1? best regards, kevin _______________________________________________ <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> [/q] Kevin you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. or1200_defines.v says: // // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock // // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines // // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED // and use clmode to set ratio // // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use // clmode to set ratio `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you commenting out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: kevinlinsun@hotmail.com> To: openrisc@opencores.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? Hi When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set clmode_i = 2'b00, the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1? best regards, kevin _______________________________________________ http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? by Unknown on May 4, 2004			Not available!
Hi Thanks for your reply. but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampret<<A HREF="mailto:lampret@o...">lampret@o...</A>> To: Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q] Kevin you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. or1200_defines.v says: // // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock // // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines // // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED // and use clmode to set ratio // // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use // clmode to set ratio `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you commenting out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@h...">kevinlinsun@h...</A>> To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@o...">openrisc@o...</A>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q]> Hi > When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set [/q] clmode_i = 2'b00, [q]> the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to [/q] make [q]> WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > best regards, > kevin > _______________________________________________ > <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> > [/q] [/q] Hi Thanks for your reply. but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampretlampret@o...> To: Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? Kevin you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. or1200_defines.v says: // // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock // // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines // // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED // and use clmode to set ratio // // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use // clmode to set ratio `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you commenting out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: kevinlinsun@h...> To: openrisc@o...> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > Hi > When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set clmode_i = 2'b00, > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to make > WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > best regards, > kevin > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc >

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? by Unknown on May 4, 2004			Not available!
Quoting or1200_defines.v // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines In general however I'd recommend you to enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED and disable (comment out) OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED and set clmode_i port to 2'b00. regards Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@hotmail.com">kevinlinsun@hotmail.com</A>> To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@opencores.org">openrisc@opencores.org</A>> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q] Hi Thanks for your reply. but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampret<<A HREF="mailto:lampret@o...">lampret@o...</A>> To: Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q]> Kevin > > you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. > or1200_defines.v says: > // > // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock > // > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable > // both defines > // > // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > // and use clmode to set ratio > // > // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use > // clmode to set ratio > `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED > Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you > commenting > out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? > regards, > Damjan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@h...">kevinlinsun@h...</A>> > To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@o...">openrisc@o...</A>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = > 1:1? [q] > Hi > When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set [/q] > clmode_i = 2'b00, [q] > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to [/q] > make [q] > WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > best regards, > kevin > _______________________________________________ > <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> > [/q] > > [/q] _______________________________________________ <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> [/q] Quoting or1200_defines.v // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines In general however I'd recommend you to enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED and disable (comment out) OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED and set clmode_i port to 2'b00. regards Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: kevinlinsun@hotmail.com> To: openrisc@opencores.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? Hi Thanks for your reply. but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampretlampret@o...> To: Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > Kevin > > you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. > or1200_defines.v says: > // > // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock > // > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable > // both defines > // > // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > // and use clmode to set ratio > // > // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use > // clmode to set ratio > `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED > Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you > commenting > out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? > regards, > Damjan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: kevinlinsun@h...> > To: openrisc@o...> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = > 1:1? > Hi > When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set > clmode_i = 2'b00, > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to > make > WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > best regards, > kevin > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc > > > _______________________________________________ http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc

Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? by Unknown on May 5, 2004			Not available!
thank you.i'll try once more. best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampret<<A HREF="mailto:lampret@o...">lampret@o...</A>> To: Date: Tue May 4 19:22:54 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? [q] Quoting or1200_defines.v // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines In general however I'd recommend you to enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED and disable (comment out) OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED and set clmode_i port to 2'b00. regards Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@h...">kevinlinsun@h...</A>> To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@o...">openrisc@o...</A>> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC [/q] clock [q] = 1:1? [q]> Hi > Thanks for your reply. > but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? > > best regards, > kevin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Damjan Lampret<<A HREF="mailto:lampret@o...">lampret@o...</A>> > To: > Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC [/q] clock = [q]> 1:1? > [q] > Kevin > > you first have to learn to read the comments in front of [/q] defines. [q] > or1200_defines.v says: > // > // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock > // > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable > // both defines > // > // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable [/q] OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED [q] > // and use clmode to set ratio > // > // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and [/q] use [q] > // clmode to set ratio > `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED > Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why [/q] are you [q] > commenting > out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? > regards, > Damjan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <<A HREF="mailto:kevinlinsun@h...">kevinlinsun@h...</A>> > To: <<A HREF="mailto:openrisc@o...">openrisc@o...</A>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC [/q] clock = [q] > 1:1? [q]> > Hi > > When i comment "`define [/q] OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" [q]> > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or [/q] set [q] > clmode_i = 2'b00, [q]> > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell [/q] me how to [q] > make [q]> > WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > > > best regards, > > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > > <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> > > [/q] > > [/q] > _______________________________________________ > <A HREF="http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc">http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc</A> > [/q] [/q] thank you.i'll try once more. best regards, kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: Damjan Lampretlampret@o...> To: Date: Tue May 4 19:22:54 CEST 2004 Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? Quoting or1200_defines.v // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable // both defines In general however I'd recommend you to enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED and disable (comment out) OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED and set clmode_i port to 2'b00. regards Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: kevinlinsun@h...> To: openrisc@o...> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > Hi > Thanks for your reply. > but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do? > > best regards, > kevin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Damjan Lampretlampret@o...> > To: > Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004 > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = > 1:1? > > Kevin > > you first have to learn to read the comments in front of defines. > or1200_defines.v says: > // > // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock > // > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable > // both defines > // > // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > // and use clmode to set ratio > // > // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and use > // clmode to set ratio > `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED > //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED > Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why are you > commenting > out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED?? > regards, > Damjan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: kevinlinsun@h...> > To: openrisc@o...> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = > 1:1? > > Hi > > When i comment "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED" > > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or set > clmode_i = 2'b00, > > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell me how to > make > > WB:RISC clock = 1:1? > > > > best regards, > > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc >

no use

no use

1/1

no use

no use

© copyright 1999-2025 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.