1/1

|
OpenRisc ISS : is it cycle-accurate?
by Unknown on Dec 9, 2004 |
Not available! | ||
|
Dear all,
I'm just new in this nice project of OpenRisc and so I have to make some skill. I have to develop a multiprocessor application and so I was looking for the best architecture on which my system should be based. It is very attractive to use an OpenCore IP, and so I would like to use this processor in my research activity. I was wondering if the OpenRisc Architectural simulator has a cycle-accurate ISS. I would also like to know what do you think on possibility of creating a multiprocessor OpenRisc environment. Regards. Sergio Tota |
|||
|
OpenRisc ISS : is it cycle-accurate?
by Unknown on Dec 10, 2004 |
Not available! | ||
|
* Sergio Tota (sergio.tota@polito.it) wrote:
Dear all,
I'm just new in this nice project of OpenRisc and so I have to make some skill. I have to develop a multiprocessor application and so I was looking for the best architecture on which my system should be based. It is very attractive to use an OpenCore IP, and so I would like to use this processor in my research activity. I was wondering if the OpenRisc Architectural simulator has a cycle-accurate ISS. all instructions in architectual simulator are executed in 1 cycle but this is not the case for all (just most) instructions in or1200 implementation. having said that, architectual simulator does take into account different cache and mmu models. in fact, architectual simulator should be cycle accurate for OpenRisc processor implementation that executes all instructions in 1 cycle. any difference would infact be considered a bug. regards, p. |
|||
1/1

