OpenCores

OpenCores

no use

no use

1/1

no use

no use

PCI32Tlite by dannyv on Feb 6, 2017			dannyv Posts: 4 Joined: Nov 15, 2016 Last seen: Dec 27, 2017
Hi, I have updated the original files for a smaller BAR0 (memory 64K), is someone interested with that or it is too trivial? Danny Hi, I have updated the original files for a smaller BAR0 (memory 64K), is someone interested with that or it is too trivial? Danny

RE: PCI32Tlite by jhstauffer on Feb 6, 2017			jhstauffer Posts: 1 Joined: May 4, 2009 Last seen: Sep 6, 2018
This may fit one of our applications. What is the forum location of the code? Thanks! Jack S. This may fit one of our applications. What is the forum location of the code? Thanks! Jack S.

RE: PCI32Tlite by dannyv on Feb 7, 2017			dannyv Posts: 4 Joined: Nov 15, 2016 Last seen: Dec 27, 2017
from Some reason, I can't see my response. files attached again. from Some reason, I can't see my response. files attached again.

RE: PCI32Tlite by ocadmin on Jun 30, 2017			ocadmin Posts: 76 Joined: Oct 27, 2007 Last seen: Apr 17, 2024
Did you figure out what went wrong with your previous post? The attached files you refer to, don't seem to be visible. Best, /:/ OC-team Did you figure out what went wrong with your previous post? The attached files you refer to, don't seem to be visible. Best, /:/ OC-team

RE: PCI32Tlite by dannyv on Jul 2, 2017			dannyv Posts: 4 Joined: Nov 15, 2016 Last seen: Dec 27, 2017
trying a VHD file , after i will try a zip file. Danny trying a VHD file , after i will try a zip file. Danny

RE: PCI32Tlite by dannyv on Jul 3, 2017			dannyv Posts: 4 Joined: Nov 15, 2016 Last seen: Dec 27, 2017
A simple vhd file did not pass, i do not know what to do more. Open a new project seem to be a over kill for a minor change. Danny A simple vhd file did not pass, i do not know what to do more. Open a new project seem to be a over kill for a minor change. Danny

RE: PCI32Tlite by peio on Jul 3, 2017			peio Posts: 19 Joined: Nov 25, 2004 Last seen: Dec 20, 2023
Hi danny, I think you aren't a project maintainer, so you should not be able to add files to the project. Moreover, as you say, "it is too trivial". Probably not worth adding noise to the OC Projects. Also the PCI bus is a dead bus, sure no much people interested on it. Hi danny, I think you aren't a project maintainer, so you should not be able to add files to the project. Moreover, as you say, "it is too trivial". Probably not worth adding noise to the OC Projects. Also the PCI bus is a dead bus, sure no much people interested on it.

RE: PCI32Tlite by ocadmin on Jul 14, 2017			ocadmin Posts: 76 Joined: Oct 27, 2007 Last seen: Apr 17, 2024
[q]trying a VHD file , after i will try a zip file.[/q] could you please try to attach a file to a post in the forum once again? See attached test text file from us. It was indeed a problem of the forum, but it should be fixed now. Let us know. Best, /:/ OC-team[q]<a href="uploads/1500050529_test_post_attachment.txt">test_post_attachment.txt</a> (0 kb)[/q] trying a VHD file , after i will try a zip file. could you please try to attach a file to a post in the forum once again? See attached test text file from us. It was indeed a problem of the forum, but it should be fixed now. Let us know. Best, /:/ OC-team test_post_attachment.txt (0 kb)

RE: PCI32Tlite by ocadmin on Jul 14, 2017			ocadmin Posts: 76 Joined: Oct 27, 2007 Last seen: Apr 17, 2024
[q]I think you aren't a project maintainer, so you should not be able to add files to the project. Moreover, as you say, "it is too trivial". Probably not worth adding noise to the OC Projects. Also the PCI bus is a dead bus, sure no much people interested on it.[/q] If the goal was indeed to push changes to the svn repository, you would have to contact the project maintainer. I think it is up to him/her judging if your added features are valuable or not. Best, /:/ OC-team I think you aren't a project maintainer, so you should not be able to add files to the project. Moreover, as you say, "it is too trivial". Probably not worth adding noise to the OC Projects. Also the PCI bus is a dead bus, sure no much people interested on it. If the goal was indeed to push changes to the svn repository, you would have to contact the project maintainer. I think it is up to him/her judging if your added features are valuable or not. Best, /:/ OC-team

RE: PCI32Tlite by nanostate on Jun 13, 2018			nanostate Posts: 1 Joined: Jun 13, 2018 Last seen: May 7, 2021
Hello everyone, I am interested in this small PCI target as a beginner. How can I get this update ? R04 is interesting too, especially with the CAN controller since I am working with end products that use CAN. Could it be released now ? Thanks for updates. Hello everyone, I am interested in this small PCI target as a beginner. How can I get this update ? R04 is interesting too, especially with the CAN controller since I am working with end products that use CAN. Could it be released now ? Thanks for updates.

RE: PCI32Tlite by peio on Jun 18, 2018			peio Posts: 19 Joined: Nov 25, 2004 Last seen: Dec 20, 2023
Hello nanostate, The PCI Bus is a almost dead technology, I don't dedicate more time to this project. Anyway, with the last release, creation of a CAN slave using the Whisbone Bus is easy. Regards. Peio Hello nanostate, The PCI Bus is a almost dead technology, I don't dedicate more time to this project. Anyway, with the last release, creation of a CAN slave using the Whisbone Bus is easy. Regards. Peio

no use

no use

1/1

no use

no use

© copyright 1999-2024 OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.